Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Number during Unity Connection Call Transfer to external number
I there is a service parameter that you have to chante to preserve the caller id. I don't remember the name of the option though Hth Enviado desde mi iPhone El Sep 14, 2011, a las 14:21, Steffen Bruening steffen.bruen...@intact-is.com escribió: Hi all, this question is not related to the CCIE labs, but hopefully you can help me to find an answer. When a caller reach a user voicemail and choose the caller input option to be forwarded to an alternate number (in this case the mobile number) I can see in the isdn debug that extension of the used voicemail-port for this call transfer is used as calling number instead of the originating number. Any ideas how I could achieve that the originating phone number will be presented? The german telco do not check or restrict the calling number presentation (CLIP no screening). Regards Steffen __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 4 g729 calls
Is it compressed audio maybe? Enviado desde mi iPhone El Sep 10, 2011, a las 4:49, Ray jonha...@yahoo.com escribió: in lab5 task 7.2... it says 16k for singnaling and 4 g729 calls. the question is why is 47 used for bandwidth instead of 96 (24x4=96). ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS integration and CUPC time consuming
i spend 8 hours. 1 proctor-lab session just configuring/troubleshooting CUPS in my lab session before i got all the glitches and solutions and found a way to configure it real fast once i had it configured i'd revert the pod and start again, and again until you're up to speed and get your cupc clients and ippm working all the time, the very first time 2011/7/24 Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com You should be able to do it within 10 to 15 minutes. Michael On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.comwrote: hi guys, i am finding it takes me 25 to 30 minutes to configure CUCM for CUPS (including 2 x CUPC and 1 x IPPM) and CUPS. just want to know, is it the time frame you guys are taking? thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed
congratulations man !! 2011/7/22 Hough, Earl earl.ho...@pcmallservices.com Congratulations, and enjoy a well-deserved break! ** ** Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (RS/Security/Voice) ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* Friday, July 22, 2011 9:36 AM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed ** ** Just found out the good news. I passed CCIE Voice #29657. This must be a good week to take the lab. Congrats to the others who passed this week as well Adam Compton _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS bandwidth calculations
i have always used the values from the QoS SRND and i haven't had any problems take a look at the following analysis http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg06644.html 2011/7/21 CCIEVoiceKP ccievoic...@gmail.com I'm good with how to calculate BW from the QoS SRND, however it seems to get a little squishy when it comes to values for cRTP and rounding the output. For example, say I have a requirement to allow 5 g729 calls and I'm using MLP with header compression. We know that by default CRTp should be 2 without checksum and 4 with checksum but in going through the Vol1 and Vol 2 labs and VoDs I've seen both values used with no metion of whether or not checksum was a requirement. So if we calcualte first with cRTP of 2 bytes we get 13 + 2 + 20 = 35 * 8 * 50 = 14000 = *14kbps* with cRTP of 4 we get 13 + 4 + 20 = 14800 = *14.8kbps.* Now if we multiply this out by the number of calls we get 14kbps * 5 = *70kbps* and 14.8 * 5 = *74kbps *respectively or do we? Because I've seen the rounding take place earlier on so we would in essence have 15kbps * 5 = *75kbps.* Keep in mind this is if your following the SRND. Vik and Amy recommend using 9bytes as the L2 value for MLP as opposed to 13bytes... I realize this is a more accurate number but do we have any official guidance as to how the proctors are grading this? Are they using values strictly from the SRND? How big is the window or margin of error for these calculations? I know this sounds like splitting hairs but I've taken the lab before and walked away with 0 points in QoS not knowing why. Thanks in advance for any insight? KP ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE #29619
congratulations Emin good job man !! 2011/7/20 Ashraf Ayyash ash.ayy...@gmail.com Congratulatuion Emin , all the best , Ash On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Emin Guliyev eguli...@fidelus.com wrote: Guys, I passed the lab yesterday on second attempt. I appreciate all the help I have gotten from OSL. Regards, Emin ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] passed CCIE 29606
hello guys, My 2 year journey just came to an end. I took my 3rd attempt yesterday in San Jose and i just got my score 5 mins ago with good news I'm CCIE # 29606 It was long hours of study time and lab time I couldn't afford a home lab so all i did is rent equipment from Proctorlabs i was able to get physical phones to test. which was pretty good my strategy was a bit different from what people usually recommend I started with Infrastructure of course switch config all that needed to be done in the switch including QoS, so i could forget about that device then i moved to HQ, SiteB and SiteC NTP, vlans, and then QoS right away after that i started working on CUE (because i know it takes long time) then i moved to PRI configs then i started working on configuring my phones, basic config then i moved over to VM, then UCCX, then all the features requested and at the end i did call routing something that actually helped me out a lot to improve my speed was i created my configs in notepad and i called those my templates, so during the week i didn't have access to any rack rental sessions so i was practicing in notepad i did the workbooks 1 and 2 only once then i was using the rack rental sessions to practice pretty heavily on a tech basis everthing from inside out and every once in a while start adding more technologies that was my experience i didn't know how to approach this beast at the beginning I was reading all the documentation all the pdf's and books and i was getting bored so i dediced to read all the documentation, pdf's and books on a technology basis i printed a calendar and with the blue print on the other hand i marked which days i was going to spend studying X item on the blue print so by the time it was the weekend i could practice that in my lab sessions during the weekend and get as much as i could from the rack rental sessions thank you very much for all your support and also for my study partners from all over the world I'll try to help you to get your number as well, you guys helped me, i'm going to try to do the same have a great day ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctors in San Jose
i forgot to mention Tom the proctor in San Jose is retired, he took early retirement so there are only 2 proctors in San Jose now, Tong and Ben this week the proctor in San Jose will be Scott, a guy from Australia very friendly, very nice guy ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] passed CCIE 29606
Media Resource Management, Cisco Unified Communications Manager System Guide, Release 7.0(1) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmsys/a05media.html Annunciator, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmsys/a05ann.html Conference Bridge, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmsys/a05confb.html Transcoders, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmsys/a05trans.html MTP, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmsys/a05mtp.html DSP resources for Transcoding, Conferencig, MTP http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmsys/a05dsp.html DSP, MTP types, configuration of HW Conference and Transcoder resources, CVOICE Chapter 2, pages 91-120 DSP, MTP types, configuration of HW Conference and Transcoder resources, Cisco Voice Gateways and Gatekeepers Chapter 14, pages 411-435 CIPT1, MEDIA RESOURCES Chapter 15, pages 367 - 405 8. CM Features: Extension Mobility, IPMA, Attendant Console, Call Park, Pickup EXTENSION MOBILITY, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Features and Services Guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fsem.pdf ATTENDANT CONSOLE, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Features and Services Guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fsccmac.pdf CALL PARK, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Features and Services Guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fscallpk.pdf PICKUP, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Features and Services Guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fscpickg.pdf CIPT 1, USER FEATURES CHAPTER 16, pages407 - 414 CIPT 2, IMPLEMENTING EXTENSION MOBILITY CHAPTER 12, pages 301 - 320 IPMA, Proxy Line Support, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Features and Services Guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fsipma.pdf IPMA, Shared Line Support, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Features and Services Guide http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmfeat/fsipmasl.pdf 9. Phone Settings 10. CTI, TAPI and JTAPI Interface CTI, SRND CTI 8-13, 8-18, 13-19, 16-2, 16-44 CTI Manager 8-4, 8-13 CTI, Cisco Unified Communications Manager System Guide, Release 7.0(1) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/7_0_1/ccmsys/a08cti.html#wpmkr1026233 JTAPI, SRND JTAPI 8-13, 16-2 2011/7/19 Hough, Earl earl.ho...@pcmallservices.com Congratulations! That’s a great feeling of accomplishment, I know! ** ** Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (RS/Security/Voice) ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cristobal Priego *Sent:* Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11:49 AM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] passed CCIE 29606 ** ** hello guys, My 2 year journey just came to an end. I took my 3rd attempt yesterday in San Jose and i just got my score 5 mins ago with good news I'm CCIE # 29606 It was long hours of study time and lab time I couldn't afford a home lab so all i did is rent equipment from Proctorlabs i was able to get physical phones to test. which was pretty good my strategy was a bit different from what people usually recommend I started with Infrastructure of course switch config all that needed to be done in the switch including QoS, so i could forget about that device then i moved to HQ, SiteB and SiteC NTP, vlans, and then QoS right away after that i started working on CUE (because i know it takes long time) then i moved to PRI configs then i started working on configuring my phones, basic config then i moved over to VM, then UCCX, then all the features requested and at the end i did call routing something that actually helped me out a lot to improve my speed was i created my configs in notepad and i called those my templates, so during the week i didn't have access to any rack rental sessions so i was practicing in notepad i did the workbooks 1 and 2 only once then i was using the rack rental sessions to practice pretty heavily on a tech basis everthing from inside out and every once in a while start adding more technologies that was my experience i didn't know how to approach this beast at the beginning I was reading all the documentation all the pdf's and books and i was getting bored so i dediced to read all the documentation, pdf's and books on a technology basis i printed a calendar and with the blue print on the other hand i marked which days i was going to spend studying X item on the blue print so by the time it was the weekend i could practice that in my lab
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUCM username password
admin c1sc0123 2011/7/15 narayan sarma narayan.na...@hotmail.com Hi, Can anyone tell the username password of the CUCM in ipexpert. I m having a seesion now..but i m stuck outside of the CUCM because of not having the username pass.. Thanks Regards Narayan Dev Sarma ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Logistic info for the lab
to answer your questions you can bring food, water, pens to the lab, however at your desk you can only have the water and pens, you can't have the food the lunch break depends on the place where you take the lab in San Jose is between 30-40 mins break you don't have to do any patching at all the only paper provided is the lab questions, in a binder you get 2 sheets of paper on your desk to make your notes, and you can ask the proctor for more paper if needed 2011/7/13 Vega Wong vega2...@yahoo.com.au Hi experts Many experts had advised that time management is a very important ( if not the most important) aspect during the lab. This leads me to wonder some of the smaller things during the lab: 1. What can we bring in to the lab? Water bottle? 2. How long is the lunch break? Is it allocated at a specific time? 3. Do we have to do the patching of cables? 4. What do they provide apart from the Cisco PDF? Any writing papers? Obviously I havent had my first attempt yet, but I will have mine soon. Just thought the more I know the better, Hope those who had the experience can share Cheers Vega ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Logistic info for the lab
in San Jose I asked the question about the food to Tom and he told me that you can bring food and water, only water is allowed on your desk if you want to eat something you have to go to the table that is close to the door to eat it. you're allowed to bring your own food, in fact i did it for my 2nd attempt in San Jose, i had apples, oranges, fruitbars and water, no problems 2011/7/13 cciev wannabe cciev.wann...@gmail.com Answers: 1. Nothing. They provide you food and water/soda. I have seen one guy who brought his own lunch because of religious practice and they allow it 2. I have been to RTP only where 30 minutes lunch in a small conf room attached to the lab 3. No you don't have to do any hardware stuffs 4. two A4 size papers and bunch of colored pencils and cisco support page is accessible (don't type url in, just hit home button) On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Vega Wong vega2...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Hi experts Many experts had advised that time management is a very important ( if not the most important) aspect during the lab. This leads me to wonder some of the smaller things during the lab: 1. What can we bring in to the lab? Water bottle? 2. How long is the lunch break? Is it allocated at a specific time? 3. Do we have to do the patching of cables? 4. What do they provide apart from the Cisco PDF? Any writing papers? Obviously I havent had my first attempt yet, but I will have mine soon. Just thought the more I know the better, Hope those who had the experience can share Cheers Vega ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Second Attempt
sometimes it's hard to keep the motivation after you've failed the test and you see your score. try to find a study partner that will make you commit to get the cert, get updates frequently and stuff. i have taken the lab twice in the last 2 months and i'm going for my third attempt next week. it's great to have a motivation like a raise, i don't know if i'm going to get a raise if i get my cert, but i know i'm going to gain credibility and trust, and perhaps a job offer. I live and work in northern California and i wish there was a great market for ccie's or maybe there is but i haven't been looked at those opportunities yet. there are great people knowledgeable willing to pass this test, try to find them and keep it up i've been studying for a bit over 1.5 years now for this test and i'd love to pass it sooner than later. 2011/7/13 adam compton com...@gmail.com Believe me, I was pissed after my second attempt and failed as well. I'm taking 3rd attempt next thursday. Some things changed from when I took it in March and in June. so the best advice I could give is to try it over and over as quick as possible until you get it. I've got a big raise on the line, so the incentive to pass is big. I just started a new job that was a huge raise from my last job, and that was because I was studying CCIE Voice. I probably wouldn't have gotten the interview without it. I cannot speak for all countries and areas, but in the Southeast US, this certification is HIGHLY in demand. More in demand than CCIE RS by a long shot. I agree it seems like cisco is hell-bent on failing everyone with silly requirements, and being shady about telling you what to study, but the fact of the matter is, if you want the recognition that comes with CCIE Voice, you have to grin, bear it, and take it like a woman ;) Adam Compton On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Ccie Voice v.c...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All, I did my first attempt, I did not pass but the report was very good and most of my marks 100%. The report encourages me to do my second attempt. I prepared for the second attempt and I did my second attempt. Second attempt was much better than the first one. I studied very well and tried to avoid my mistakes in my first attempt. Unfortunately, the report was very bad. Most of my marks 40%, 20%, and some 0%. But why??? Some questions are exactly the same with first attempt? Why I am getting 100 in my first attempt and 0 in my second attempt. Some of the requirements I was not able to solve it and thought I will get 0 because I did not solve it but in the report 100%. Is it a magic? I am now very pessimistic I am thinking to leave my CCIE and I am sometimes I thinking to leave Cisco and work with other vendors. I am very sorry for this bad e-mail. Specially, for who is preparing right now. But I am really very pessimistic from my second attempt and I need some advises from your side Regards, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS MLP LFI
sure no problem i configured MLP LFI manually and tested connectivity from BR2 and BR1 to HQ, BR2 no problems, because there's no virtual-template however from BR2 to HQ the connectivity was fine unless you reload BR2 router, once the router came back up, I lost connectivity to HQ and of course all the servers after that I tried reloading the HQ router, no difference same issue so i applied the following workaround I went to the sub-interface on BR2 router removed the frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp virtual-template 1 command re-added the command re-added the class-map to the fram-relay interface connectivity came back up however if you reload the BR2 router again, i was having the same problem so at the end what it did was fix the connectivity problem, once I had connectivity back, what i did is Reload HQ router once HQ came back up, I could reload Br2 router multiple times and the connectivity issue was resloved hope this helps 2011/7/11 Ronmac ron...@solcon.nl Hi, Maybe a hint on what was wrong? Share the knowledge. Send from my iPad2 Op 11 jul. 2011 om 00:32 heeft Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: nevermind i figured it out thanks 2011/7/10 Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com cristobalpri...@gmail.com hello all I know we have address this issue several times i'm configuring MLP manually and this is how i have HQ configured int serial 0/0/1:0.1 bandwidth 384 int serial 0/0/1:0 frame-relay traffic-shapping class-map VOICE match ip dscp ef class-map match-any SIG match ip dscp cs3 match ip dscp af31 policy-map VOIP class VOICE priority percent 33 class SIG bandwidth percent 5 class class-default fair-queue map-class frame-relay myconfig frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay bc 3840 int virtual-template 1 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0 bandwidth 384 ppp multilink ppp multilint interleave ppp multilink fragment delay 10 service-policy out VOIP int serial 0/0/1:0.1 no ip add no frame-relay interface-dlci frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp virtual-template 1 no sh class myconfig Branch1 is pretty much the same when i reload Branch1 I lose connectivity to HQ so i go to HQ and go to the sub interface and remove frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp virtual-template1 add it back in do the same on branch1 and i have connectivity back however as soon as i reload either the branc1 or hq router I lose connectivity again and i have to issue the same workaround to get it to work again what do you guys recommend on this issue ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QRT logs
hello all cold you please let me know if the jitter shown on the QRT reports is one way or round trip ? thank you ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME H323 signal and media packet source
on h323 that command h323-gateway v b s voice vlan ip addr binds the media and the control signaling to that ip address 2011/7/11 Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com hi expert, if a customer ask you to source H323 signal and media from voice vlan interface on CME router then what commands be issued? i would do following: 1) Telephony-service ip source address voice vlan interface ip address 2) int vlan voice vlan id h323 v b s voice vlan ip add Is this what you would do or something else? thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS MLP LFI
hello all I know we have address this issue several times i'm configuring MLP manually and this is how i have HQ configured int serial 0/0/1:0.1 bandwidth 384 int serial 0/0/1:0 frame-relay traffic-shapping class-map VOICE match ip dscp ef class-map match-any SIG match ip dscp cs3 match ip dscp af31 policy-map VOIP class VOICE priority percent 33 class SIG bandwidth percent 5 class class-default fair-queue map-class frame-relay myconfig frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay bc 3840 int virtual-template 1 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0 bandwidth 384 ppp multilink ppp multilint interleave ppp multilink fragment delay 10 service-policy out VOIP int serial 0/0/1:0.1 no ip add no frame-relay interface-dlci frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp virtual-template 1 no sh class myconfig Branch1 is pretty much the same when i reload Branch1 I lose connectivity to HQ so i go to HQ and go to the sub interface and remove frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp virtual-template1 add it back in do the same on branch1 and i have connectivity back however as soon as i reload either the branc1 or hq router I lose connectivity again and i have to issue the same workaround to get it to work again what do you guys recommend on this issue ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] WAN QoS MLP LFI
nevermind i figured it out thanks 2011/7/10 Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com hello all I know we have address this issue several times i'm configuring MLP manually and this is how i have HQ configured int serial 0/0/1:0.1 bandwidth 384 int serial 0/0/1:0 frame-relay traffic-shapping class-map VOICE match ip dscp ef class-map match-any SIG match ip dscp cs3 match ip dscp af31 policy-map VOIP class VOICE priority percent 33 class SIG bandwidth percent 5 class class-default fair-queue map-class frame-relay myconfig frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay mincir 384000 frame-relay be 0 frame-relay bc 3840 int virtual-template 1 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0 bandwidth 384 ppp multilink ppp multilint interleave ppp multilink fragment delay 10 service-policy out VOIP int serial 0/0/1:0.1 no ip add no frame-relay interface-dlci frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp virtual-template 1 no sh class myconfig Branch1 is pretty much the same when i reload Branch1 I lose connectivity to HQ so i go to HQ and go to the sub interface and remove frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp virtual-template1 add it back in do the same on branch1 and i have connectivity back however as soon as i reload either the branc1 or hq router I lose connectivity again and i have to issue the same workaround to get it to work again what do you guys recommend on this issue ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN-WAN call drop scenario
hello Adil, I just had the same problem with proctorlabs. i check the pstn-wan router and the codec gas set to g711 all my regions, my dialpeers for my cube was set to g729 and when i was calling from hq or br1 i was able to call the pstn phone no problems i was able to resolve it by going to the h225 trunk and uncheck the checkbox for Wait for far end h245 terminal capability set after that i reset the trunk i called again and as soon as i answer the pstn line my call dropped hth 2011/7/7 George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com Hi Adil, Without debug h245 asn1 it's difficult to be sure, but I bet on this other rack rental they do support g729 codec on incoming dial-peer on PSTN-WAN router and thats why the call succeeds. Sent from my iPad On 7 Jul 2011, at 02:08, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote: hi experts, in ipexpert lab, i make call from HQ phone to PSTN-WAN via CUBE, when the call is answered by PSTN-WAN phone, call fails. This is due to codec mismatch and i can get 'TSC rejected' message in 'debug h245 asn1'. I have been succeful in simulating this on everytime in last 5 attempts on ipexpert lab. few days back, i used other providers lab for which i paid lot of money. i did same configuration as i do on ipexpert lab (that is create g729 region which talks to HQ and BR1 region as g729. Assign g729 region to GK device pool. Assign this device pool to GK trunk). (note: I use this trunk to make a 4 digit call to BR2 phone and when i do 'show gatekeeper call', i see 16k used. So, i know that GK trunk is definately using g729 codec.) for PSTN-WAN, i configured CUBE as well. When i make a call to PSTN-WAN when the call is answered call does not drop. I was expecting it to drop due to codec mismatch. Here is my configuration on HQ router: voice service voip all h t h gatkeeper zone local VIA http://ipexpert.comipexpert.com zone local GK http://ipexpert.comipexpert.com 10.10.110.1 using local loopback zone remote PSTN-WAN http://joblog.comjoblog.com outvia VIA zone prefix PSTN-WAN 01191* zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix GK 212* gw-priority 0 CME zone prefix GK 617* gw-priority 0 CME no shut int lo 0 ip add 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.0 h323-g v b s 10.10.110.1 h323-g v inter h323-g v id VIA ipadd 10.10.110.1 h323-g v h323-id HQ-RTR gateway dial-p voice 91 voip destination-p 01191T incoming called 01191 session target ras dtmf-r h245-al no vad On CUCM: a route pattern 9.011916737485173 partition: pt-hq-CallToIndia discard digit predot routelist: rl-gk-CallToIndia contains gk trunk calling party External number mask: On Do you guys see any problem in above config. Have you come across similar situation in non-IPexpert lab for which you have paid lot of money? If so, how did you resolve it. Thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_| adil.sha...@gmail.comadil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comwww.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME EM Host not found
what i'd personally do is go to telephony service telephony-service no authentication credential secretname psswrd no url services http://10.10.202.1/CMEserverForPhone/serviceurl no url authentication http://10.10.202.1/CCMCIP/authenticate.aspsecretname psswrd and then go to global config mode and issue ip http server that will configure the default services that you need, at least that's what i personally do instead of creating the services manually ! 2011/7/8 Farkas Péter wormh...@sch.bme.hu Gents, I am facing an EM issue on CME cannot step over. EM is configured like: voice logout-profile 1 number 3002 type normal ! voice user-profile 1 max-idle-time 10 user br2phn3 password adgjm number 3005 type normal speed-dial 1 3006 ! ephone 2 privacy off device-security-mode none mac-address 0005.9A3C.7800 ephone-template 2 type CIPC logout-profile 1 ! telephony-service authentication credential secretname psswrd url services http://10.10.202.1/CMEserverForPhone/serviceurl url authentication http://10.10.202.1/CCMCIP/authenticate.asp secretname psswrd ! When I press the Services button on CIPC only Host not found error message apperars on the phone. So I cannot reach EM menu at all. I can see phone tries to reach CME: Jul 8 14:07:07.436: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:07:07 GMT 192.168.208.1 /CMEserverForPhone/serviceurl ok Protocol = HTTP/1.1 Method = GET Query = locale=English_United_Statesname=SEP00059A3C7800 Any thought to resolve? Peter ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - Voice Mail Access from SIP Phone
By default, SIP uses in-band signaling, sending the DTMF information in the voice stream. However, you can configure it to use RTP-NTE, SIP INFO messages, SIP NOTIFY messages, or KPML for transmitting DTMF tone information. RTP-NTE is an in-band DTMF relay method, which uses RTP Named Telephony Event (NTE) packets to carry DTMF information instead of voice. If RTP-NTE is configured, SDP is used to negotiate the payload type value for NTE packets and the events that will be sent using NTE. Cisco has two out-of-band procedures for DTMF relay. One uses SIP INFO methods, and the other uses SIP NOTIFY methods. The SIP INFO method sends DTMF digits in INFO messages. It is always enabled. When a gateway receives an INFO message containing DTMF relay information, it sends the corresponding tone. NOTIFY-based out-of-band DTMF relay is negotiated by including a Call-Info field in the SIP INVITE and response messages. This field indicates an ability to use NOTIFY for DTMF tones and the duration of each tone in milliseconds. Using this method can help SIP gateways interoperate with Skinny phones. 2011/7/7 adam compton com...@gmail.com Yes, this is the behavior I have seen in the lab. Because there are 2 call legs, CME handles the different dtmf types between the phone and CUE. I could be wrong, but I think 7960s and maybe other phones as well do not support sip-notify for dtmf-relay. Regards, Adam Compton On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, mgscip gpsvoiceexpe...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Experts. Please clarify on this ! *From:* mgscip gpsvoiceexpe...@yahoo.com *To:* ccie ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Wednesday, July 6, 2011 10:21 AM *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE - Voice Mail Access from SIP Phone Hi All, When i dial the Voicemail pilot number from SIP Phone dtmf is not recognized by the CUE . once enabled the dtmf-relay rtp-nte in the voice register pool it's start working. is the way it's working ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME to CUCM Via CUBE configuration assistant
if you remove the call start interwork and on your ucm h225 trunk un check wait for far end TCS set it should work as well 2011/7/1 Art Joe Babakhani Gharibian ciscoie2...@gmail.com One more thing. I couldn't answer the call without call start interwork so I added the following class to both incoming and outgoing dial-peers. voice class h323 5 h225 timeout tcp establish 5 h225 display-ie ccm-compatible call start interwork Thanks, Joe On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Art Joe Babakhani Gharibian ciscoie2...@gmail.com wrote: thanks, it was the codec I changed it and now is working. On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:57 AM, manishankar pandey manishankar...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes this has to do with Codec mismatch. Or the Interpretation of Fast start and Slow start. Try using the below option 1) Create Voice class and then bind it to dial-peer Example : voice class h323 1 h225 timeout tcp establish 5 h225 display-ie ccm-compatible call start fast ! voice class h323 5 h225 timeout tcp establish 5 h225 display-ie ccm-compatible call start interwork ! voice class h323 6 h225 timeout tcp establish 5 h225 display-ie ccm-compatible call start slow And under Dial-peer VoIP, try testing with each Voice class h323 command voice-class h323 1/5/6 Thanks --- On *Fri, 7/1/11, Emin Guliyev eguli...@fidelus.com* wrote: From: Emin Guliyev eguli...@fidelus.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME to CUCM Via CUBE configuration assistant To: Art Joe Babakhani Gharibian ciscoie2...@gmail.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Friday, July 1, 2011, 6:01 PM Looks like it is failing due to codec negotiation. Media negotiation failure Typical scenarios include: •[image: Description: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif]No codec match occurred. •[image: Description: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/i/templates/blank.gif]H.323 or H.245 problem leading to failure in media negotiation 65 CC_CAUSE_BEARER_CAPABILITY_ NOT_IMPLEMENTED Indicates that the equipment sending this cause does not support the bearer capability requested. Jun 29 21:49:46.402: //33/8A1D25B080B9/H323/cch323_h225_send_release: Cause = 65; Location = 0 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Art Joe Babakhani Gharibian *Sent:* Friday, July 01, 2011 12:47 AM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME to CUCM Via CUBE configuration assistant Has anyone tested a call from CME to CUCM via Gatekeeper and CUBE? Could you please provide a working configuration sample? I have configured the gatekeeper to send the calls from CME to CUCM via CUBE. CME calls drop after matching an incoming voip dialpeer in the CUBE. I can’t figure out why my calls get disconnected once they match an incoming dial-peer. It is worth mentioning that I use that exact same dial-peers to send calls from CUCM to CME and they work just fine. I am pasting some show and debug outputs. Thanks, Joe *ON the CUBE show run | s dial-peer * dial-peer voice 20 voip incoming called-number . dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 21 voip destination-pattern [1,3,5]... voice-class codec 1 session target ras dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad *show run | s gatek * gatekeeper zone local Spain ipexpert.com outvia VGK zone local US ipexpert.com outvia VGK zone local VGK ipexpert.com zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 10.10.100.2 1719 zone prefix US 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix US 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix Spain 3... zone prefix US 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix US 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_2 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology no shutdown *on the CUBE debug voice dialpeer * Jun 29 21:49:12.911: //-1/762755B380B3/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore: Calling Number=3006, Called Number=5002, Voice-Interface=0x0, Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE, Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH Jun 29 21:49:12.911: //-1/762755B380B3/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore: Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_INCOMING_DNIS; Incoming Dial-peer=20 Jun 29 21:49:12.911: //-1/762755B380B3/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore: Calling Number=3006, Called Number=5002, Voice-Interface=0x0, Timeout=TRUE, Peer Encap Type=ENCAP_VOIP, Peer Search Type=PEER_TYPE_VOICE, Peer Info Type=DIALPEER_INFO_SPEECH Jun 29 21:49:12.911: //-1/762755B380B3/DPM/dpAssociateIncomingPeerCore: Result=Success(0) after DP_MATCH_INCOMING_DNIS; Incoming Dial-peer=20 *On the CUBE debug cch323 h225 * Jun 29 21:49:46.398: //-1//H323/cch323_h225_receiver: Received msg of type SETUPIND_CHOSEN Jun 29 21:49:46.398: //-1//H323/setup_ind: Entry Jun 29 21:49:46.398:
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Drop Through
i don't think that;s configurable 2011/6/30 Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com Hi experts, Is there a way to display 1 call on phone when using B-ACD Drop Through? I think that it will display 1 call on queue and that there is no way for it to display 1 call on phone, but, I better ask. Regards, -Pablo Meneses. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE in SRST.. Failover and Fall back
If you test failover by stopping the ccm service, it is expected If you shut down the wan ports the ports should register back Enviado desde mi iPhone El Jun 29, 2011, a las 21:06, sandeep.ra...@wipro.com escribió: Hi All, I have CUE in SRST mode and it works fine, but when i bring back CUCM i dont see the CTI Route point and CTI ports getting registered at all unless i reboot the CUE module. Is this the way it normally behaves or am i unaware of some configuration to fix this behaviour. Also can you please jot down few points on how should i configure CUE in SRST mode. Thanks Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration
Hello all for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which one is the best approach switchport trunk encap dotq1 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan XX switchport voice vlan XX spanning-tree portfast trunk mls qos trust cos or switchport mode acess switchport access vlan XX switchport voice vlan XX spanning-tree portfast ? mls qos trust cos This links shows how to configure ESW on ISR 2800 ios 12.4(T) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuration_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4 any comments ? I'd really appreciate those thanks wheneve ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration
thank you guys 2011/6/30 Peterson, Ryan ryan.peter...@pcmall.com I would personally keep it as simple as possible unless the book tells you to add something else… ** ** switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan XX Add only if it tells you to have a PC behind the phone. switchport voice vlan XX ** ** I would not go with the access method unless spanning-tree portfast is a requirement as access on ESW is not stable. ** ** Good luck! ** ** Ryan ** ** ** ** ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Cristobal Priego *Sent:* Thursday, June 30, 2011 7:03 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration ** ** Hello all for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which one is the best approach switchport trunk encap dotq1 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan XX switchport voice vlan XX spanning-tree portfast trunk mls qos trust cos or switchport mode acess switchport access vlan XX switchport voice vlan XX spanning-tree portfast ? mls qos trust cos This links shows how to configure ESW on ISR 2800 ios 12.4(T) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_configuration_example09186a00808066b8.shtml#step4 any comments ? I'd really appreciate those thanks wheneve _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed
congratulatins and thank you for the posts and explanations that you gave to the voice community 2011/6/29 George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com Hi all, As the subject suggests, it's official, I'm dual CCIE #19926 RS and Voice starting yesterday. Finally, it's a relief, no more studying late, spending weekends on a computer, making calls, my neighbours think I escaped a psychiatric, after hearing voices at night TEST VOICEMAIL FOR HQ PHONE 1 and my personal favourite YOUR POSITION IN QUEUE IS :) I would like to transmit a very special thank you to IPExpert, and especially Vik Malhi. He's definitely made difference for me as a trainer. Just when you think you know it all about something, he would come up with something to prove me wrong, to show me the gaps in my knowledge I didn't know existed. Thank you Vik! Thanks to everyone on this forum too, there are many good people on the forum, with big knowledge, and more importantly willing to share it. It was big fun, I enjoyed the process a lot. By the way, I made it technically on my first attempt. Well, I payed once only, although I went to exam 3 times. 1st time, technical problems, Cisco gave me free retake voucher, 2nd time, again technical problems, again free voucher. To be honest after so many free retakes, I'm not even sure if I really passed, or I was costing them too much so they decided to give it to me :-), good samaritans these cisco guys. Wish you all good luck, and don't get frustrated, and most importantly have fun. Regards, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME octo line functionality
Hello all, I've been reading the blog about octo lines on cme however i still doesn't clearly understand how the max-calls-per-button and busy-trigger-per-button work and it's correlation to shared lines could you point me to a document or if you could, please explain that to me? I'd really appreciated it ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router Loopback 0
yes both only if that router is an NTP master, otherwise CUE will ignore it i've tested this scneario multiple times and connectivity is not an issue your router could receive time form the pstn: ntp server 10.10.100.2 and if you want it to provide clocking to your netowrk devices you must make that router an ntp master, issue the show ntp associations command to check the stratum of the pstn clock and make the router an ntp master 7 or whatever otherwise CUE will ignore an NTP source that is not the service-engine ip address you 2011/6/27 Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com I have tested this with routers but not with the CUE module. Routers will definitely pull their time from a router synced with another NTP source. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Alan Gardner agard...@ctclc.com wrote: According to Vik you do not need the NTP Master. Try doing a no shut in the Service module interface!!! Best Regards, Alan Gardner Chief Executive Officer Current Technologies Computer Learning Center PH. 219.764.3800 agard...@ctclc.com MCT, MCSE (Messaging Security), MCSD, MSF Trainer, MCNI, MCNE, MCSA, CCNA, , ITIL CCNP, CCVP, CCIP, CCDP, CCIE # 22758, CCSI A+, MCDST, Network+, Server+, IT Project+, EBIZ, CTT+, MCDBA CCNT, CISSP, CWNA, CTP, CIW Microsoft Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chris Martin Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 2:27 PM To: sandeep.ra...@wipro.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router Loopback 0 Believe you also need ntp master command. Chris On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:56 AM, sandeep.ra...@wipro.com wrote: Hello All, When asked to configure NTP server for CUE as the HQ Router's loopback IP or HQ routers Voice Vlan IP, should i configure NTP master command on the HQ router besides below configuration? HQ Router: ntp server 10.10.100.2external NTP ntp source loopback 0 clock timezone PST -8 clock summer-time PDT recurring I tried configuring the CUE module with HQ routers loopback-IP and Voice VLAN IP. But faced errors saying NTP server is not accessible. Can any one please tell me what extra should i configure on HQ router or CUE router in order to get the NTP synchronization on the CUE successful. Thanks Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLS QoS issue
the output doesn't show anything like that you only only posted mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 which means CS 0 will be mapped to dscp 0 CS 1 to dscp 8 CS 2 to dscp 16 CS 3 to dscp 24 CS 4 to dscp 32 CS 5 to dscp 46 CS 6 to dscp 48 CS 7 to dscp 56 2011/6/27 Mike mik...@msn.com Hi all I’m trying to lab up a QOS run through and for some reason the switch is resetting everything to 0 ** ** Switch config: ** ** mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 mls qos ** ** interface FastEthernet0/3 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 10 mls qos trust dscp spanning-tree portfast ** ** monitor session 1 source interface Fa0/3 tx monitor session 1 destination interface Fa0/6 ** ** Wireshark reports DSCP field 0x00. ** ** ** ** Any ideas? ** ** I tried mls qos trust cos and same thing. ** ** The phone plugged into the switchport is a 7941 ** ** ** ** Thanks, Mike ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router Loopback 0
you need the ntp master command on the router with the proper stratum set otherwise when you go through the cue initialization and you enter the router's loopback it;s going to say not reachable and is going to ask for a different ntp server 2011/6/27 Alan Gardner agard...@ctclc.com According to Vik you do not need the NTP Master. ** ** Try doing a no shut in the Service module interface!!! ** ** Best Regards, ** ** Alan Gardner Chief Executive Officer Current Technologies Computer Learning Center PH. 219.764.3800 agard...@ctclc.com MCT, MCSE (Messaging Security), MCSD, MSF Trainer, MCNI, MCNE, MCSA, CCNA, , ITIL CCNP, CCVP, CCIP, CCDP, CCIE # 22758, CCSI A+, MCDST, Network+, Server+, IT Project+, EBIZ, CTT+, MCDBA CCNT, CISSP, CWNA, CTP, CIW Microsoft Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Chris Martin *Sent:* Monday, June 27, 2011 2:27 PM *To:* sandeep.ra...@wipro.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE NTP synchronisation with HQ Router Loopback 0 ** ** Believe you also need ntp master command. Chris On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:56 AM, sandeep.ra...@wipro.com wrote: Hello All, When asked to configure NTP server for CUE as the HQ Router's loopback IP or HQ routers Voice Vlan IP, should i configure NTP master command on the HQ router besides below configuration? HQ Router: ntp server 10.10.100.2external NTP ntp source loopback 0 clock timezone PST -8 clock summer-time PDT recurring I tried configuring the CUE module with HQ routers loopback-IP and Voice VLAN IP. But faced errors saying NTP server is not accessible. Can any one please tell me what extra should i configure on HQ router or CUE router in order to get the NTP synchronization on the CUE successful. Thanks *Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. * The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM getting invalid device
does yourapp user matches the user in CUPS ? is ip phone messenger on in CUPS? do you have the CTI enabled and the CTI controll all devices group associated to your app user ? 2011/6/26 Alan Gardner agard...@ctclc.com Invalid Device You were trying to access IP Phone Messenger service from a device not provisioned on Cisco CallManager server. Please work with your system administrator to get this device configured. I am running CUCM 7 and CUPS 7 and I have completed the following steps:** ** 1. Configured IP PhoneMSG service with CUPS in URL 2. Created PhoneMessenger application user and added IPC and 7965 phones in Controlled Devices 3. Associated end users with primary DNs on IPC and 7965 and configured end users with Standard CTI Enabled user group permissions. 4. Subscribed both phones with IP PhoneMSG service ** ** Any ideas ** ** ** ** Best Regards, ** ** Alan Gardner ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRF.12 question
hello all when you configure FRF.12 manually on your seial interfaces on HQ and BR2 on the HQ router where the same physical interface is used to connect BR1 and BR2, BR1 link isn't affected at all because traffic shaping isn't enabled on the physical interface, correct ? so i can pretty much ignore that link in regards to a basic QoS config if not needed thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] priority-queue out
I have the same understanding the priority queue when enabled will be serviced until the last frame has been transmitted and the sape/share will be ignored 2011/6/24 Paul Dardinski pa...@marshallcomm.com My understanding is the same as yours. Include priority queue and at that point presumably all ranged (assigned) traffic will go out as priority on that queue regardless. Assuming this traffic was to exceed allocations on other queues, they are indeed crowded out, making share/shape irrelevant….. ** ** Paul (#16842 RS/Sec) ** ** ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Dial Peer *Sent:* Friday, June 24, 2011 3:02 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] priority-queue out ** ** I'm confused by all the discussions about priority-queue out command.*** * From my understanding, this command eanble strict priority, which means none of the other queues can transmit until the priority queue was emptied. If this command was enabled, both the srr-queue bandwidth share and srr-queue bandwidth shape will be pointless. Because the switch will neither share nor shape until the priority queue was emptied. Did I understand this wrong? Thanks! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA calling name
make sure that on your RDP you have the Display field set, it will not inherit the name from the line you're associating it with 2011/6/24 Victor Malyuga victor_maly...@yahoo.com If I make a call from the remote destination number via MVA the calling name is not displayed on the called phone while the phone is ringing. Only the extension associated with the RDP is displayed. Once the call is connected the name and extension is displayed on the called phone. Did someone come across that? Line in the RDP profile has display name configured. RDP number matches when I call the mva number because I am not prompted to enter RDP number. The same problem is described in this post https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3284389 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status
yes if you go to the ccie policies uder FAQs it actually says is usually 48 hours 2011/6/23 Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com One week no result. This is too long. Has anyone read any fine print which specifies within what timeframe they will be providing result? -adil On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.comwrote: I just sent her an email. Let's see who it goes. -Pablo Meneses. On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:38 AM, William Affeldt william.affe...@yahoo.com wrote: Her name is Kathe Saccenti. I would just call Support and ask to talk to her. She is in charge of the proctors and the testing environment. --- On *Thu, 6/23/11, Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com* wrote: From: Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status To: William Affeldt william.affe...@yahoo.com Cc: George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 4:23 PM Hello Bill, Thanks for that information. Do you know Kathe's last name? Regards. -Pablo Meneses. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:09 PM, William Affeldt william.affe...@yahoo.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=william.affe...@yahoo.com wrote: You should look at this as a positive. If they deleted your test they may just give you a passing grade. You will never know though. The person you should contact is the lab ops manager. Her name is Kathe. She is a nice person and will take your call at any time. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:56 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gogli...@gmail.com wrote: WTF man, I can't believe this is happening to you. I wouldn't be able to sleep until I got the results. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com wrote: Can you believe that I haven't received the answer yet! This has been the longest wait ever. I even opened a ticket with Cert Support and so far I have just received templates. Does someone else have gone through this? I'm starting to think that they messed up on my exam. -Pablo Meneses. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Julien Krieger http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=krieger.jul...@gmail.com krieger.jul...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=krieger.jul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pablo, How did it go? Have you passed? 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com Thanks Cris. Looking forward to getting my result. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Cristobal Priego http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com cristobalpri...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: i know man i took my last attempt on a Friday as well In San Jose i didn't get my score until next Monday at 14:45 PST 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com Hopefully that's true. Longest wait EVER!!! -Pablo Meneses. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Cristobal Priego http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com cristobalpri...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: you will get today, wait 2.5 more hours that's what happens when you take it on Friday 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses http://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com pmenese...@gmail.comhttp://us.mc1146.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=pmenese...@gmail.com Hi experts, I am wondering how long it takes for you to received your score report this days. I've taken my lab last Friday and I have NOT received the answer yet. Yesterday I logged to the CCIE Online Tool and it said HOLD on the PASS/FAIL field, does someone know what that means? Has someone else gone through this? I will look forward to your reply as I figure most of you understand the feeling of not having the answer. Regards. -Pablo Meneses. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.com/www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.platinumplacement.com/www.PlatinumPlacement.comhttp://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.com/www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific 2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com You rarely even do it in the real world -Original Message- From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24 To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same route group? I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a matter of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: guys, for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups which distribution algorithm is better circular or top down i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION
Stephen, the call will fail you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth and the call will drop 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net Experts, ** ** I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering in my mind. ** ** The example is this: ** ** In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location settings. ** ** All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the SIP Trunk/PSTN. ** ** Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones. ** ** Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. ** ** Calls between regions use g729 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711 ** ** The location setting for site A is unlimited. The location setting for site B is 256 ** ** What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in it’s own Device Pool, region, etc… ** ** Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited so no issue there. According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound which requires 24k which causes Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??** ** ** ** IMO, the call will fail. ** ** Thanks, Stephen Manuel ** ** ** ** ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION
my thoughts are if you want to use QoS you actually can't do a lot ob CAC with QoS you will degrade the quality of the call, but i don't think you can fully implement CAC with QoS. this is just my thought though. i've used only 2 types of CAC mechanisim. locations CAC or GK CAC my 2 cents hth 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net That’s what I thought, but have not tested it to know for sure. ** ** As a follow up, as a general design what would be better. ** ** Using the Location setting as a form of Call-Admission-Control, or use various QOS and IOS mechanisms to implement CAC on the Gateway Routers. ** ** ** ** IMO, I would rather have CAC implemented on the Routers, leaving UCM to process calls, which is why I have usually set the Audio Bandwidth setting under Locations to Unlimited. ** ** Thanks, ** ** Stephen Manuel ** ** *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:37 PM *To:* Stephen Manuel *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION ** ** Stephen, the call will fail you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth and the call will drop 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net Experts, I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering in my mind. The example is this: In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location settings. All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the SIP Trunk/PSTN. Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones. Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. Calls between regions use g729 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711 The location setting for site A is unlimited. The location setting for site B is 256 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in it’s own Device Pool, region, etc… Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited so no issue there. According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound which requires 24k which causes Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??** ** IMO, the call will fail. Thanks, Stephen Manuel ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] how to find b-acd on cisco documentation
you will be able to open pdf files 2011/6/22 Chris Green voice5...@yahoo.com Actually, this is ended with PDF file, can we open PDF file during exam time. -- *From:* ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Wed, 22 June, 2011 11:37:28 *Subject:* CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 177 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: route group distribution algorithm (Randall Saborio) 2. UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Stephen Manuel) 3. Re: route group distribution algorithm (givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com) 4. Re: UCM LOCATION QUESTION (Cristobal Priego) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:06:48 -0600 From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com To: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm Message-ID: BANLkTin5zSzWXV08XPM=+x5je2tspgf...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Or maybe because it is never used or it never matters. If it would matter, then they would be specific about it. On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: the reason why i am asking is because in the lab they're not that specific 2011/6/22 CCIE STUDENT cciefo...@hotmail.com You rarely even do it in the real world -Original Message- From: Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:26:24 To: cristobalpri...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm Can you name when on the lab would you ever configure two devices on same route group? I don't think this is ever done on the lab. Even if it did, its not a matter of preference, but a matter of matching the task requirements. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: guys, for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups which distribution algorithm is better circular or top down i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110622/650f2f6f/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:18 -0400 From: Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION Message-ID: 007201cc3100$615f7a70$241e6f50$@bellsouth.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Experts, I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering in my mind. The example is this: In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location settings. All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the SIP Trunk/PSTN. Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones. Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. Calls between regions use g729 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711 The location setting for site A is unlimited. The location setting for site B is 256 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in it's own Device Pool, region, etc. Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited so no issue there. According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound which requires 24k which
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status
you will get today, wait 2.5 more hours that's what happens when you take it on Friday 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com Hi experts, I am wondering how long it takes for you to received your score report this days. I've taken my lab last Friday and I have NOT received the answer yet. Yesterday I logged to the CCIE Online Tool and it said HOLD on the PASS/FAIL field, does someone know what that means? Has someone else gone through this? I will look forward to your reply as I figure most of you understand the feeling of not having the answer. Regards. -Pablo Meneses. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab result status
i know man i took my last attempt on a Friday as well In San Jose i didn't get my score until next Monday at 14:45 PST 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com Hopefully that's true. Longest wait EVER!!! -Pablo Meneses. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: you will get today, wait 2.5 more hours that's what happens when you take it on Friday 2011/6/21 Pablo Meneses pmenese...@gmail.com Hi experts, I am wondering how long it takes for you to received your score report this days. I've taken my lab last Friday and I have NOT received the answer yet. Yesterday I logged to the CCIE Online Tool and it said HOLD on the PASS/FAIL field, does someone know what that means? Has someone else gone through this? I will look forward to your reply as I figure most of you understand the feeling of not having the answer. Regards. -Pablo Meneses. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to avoid phone firmware upgrade in the lab
shut down the ports on your switch or/and ESW 2011/6/21 Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com If the previous candidate using your lab spot changed the protocol as requested, let's say his lab had SIP and now yours is SCCP; there is nothing you can do to avoid this. It is not necessarily a waste of time; unless you keep staring at the phones LOL Regards, Roger Carpio. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Pithog Oil pithog...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Experts, what should i do so as to avoid phone firmware upgrade at the lab, i have discovered that some times i unknowingly have a phone firmware upgrade from one version to another. Kind assist it is usually a waste of time. Pithog Oil ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm
guys, for the lab, whenever you configure your route groups which distribution algorithm is better circular or top down i use top down all the time, but i'd like to know your opinion on this thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)
it could be a replication problem if it says reject reset the phone quite a few times and it will register eventually 2011/6/19 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx Hello I have a doubt what is reason the ip phone 7941 do not registered to cucm the status reject, I am sure the MAC and phone type in the cucm is add correctly. ** ** Thanks. ** ** ** ** -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC issue
do you have a sip trunk integration ? if you open up RTMT to check the vm ports what's the forwarding extension ? 2011/6/19 John Anzar janzar1...@live.com Hi Guys, i'm doing some testing on the unity connection. i have created the users at the CUCM and i have intergrate CUC with the CUCM. ports registered and everything is fine. But i have an strange issue. From user-a when i dial voicemail it will ask for the pin. But for the user-b its giving standard message *Hello*: Cisco *Unity Connection Messaging System*. From *a touchtone phone you may dial* an extension at *any* time. But i have check the configuration of the both users. its 100% identical. I wonder what is this. Any idea ? Best Regards John ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] interesting post
that's why i said it's interesting, i didn't mean anything else 2011/6/19 George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com ohhh, don't get me started on this one mate... I could say much... too much. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3380695#3380695 what do you think ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC issue
do you have both users configured under the same phone system ? 2011/6/19 John Anzar janzar1...@live.com Hi yes i had a sip trunk to CUC from my previous exercise. But i have remove that. Under the users of the CUC i can see the extension configurations fine. I'm forwarding it to the vm pilot. Thanks -- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:00:36 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC issue From: cristobalpri...@gmail.com To: janzar1...@live.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com do you have a sip trunk integration ? if you open up RTMT to check the vm ports what's the forwarding extension ? 2011/6/19 John Anzar janzar1...@live.com Hi Guys, i'm doing some testing on the unity connection. i have created the users at the CUCM and i have intergrate CUC with the CUCM. ports registered and everything is fine. But i have an strange issue. From user-a when i dial voicemail it will ask for the pin. But for the user-b its giving standard message *Hello*: Cisco *Unity Connection Messaging System*. From *a touchtone phone you may dial* an extension at *any* time. But i have check the configuration of the both users. its 100% identical. I wonder what is this. Any idea ? Best Regards John ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC issue
yes i have the following link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/troubleshooting/guide/7xcuctsg010.html#wp1064561 i think that the microtraces will provide the info on your issue 2011/6/19 John Anzar janzar1...@live.com yeah under the same phone system. Chris this does not make any sense. Do u have a link for the CUC trace information. i want to check what CUC receive from the CUCM end. -- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:07:57 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC issue From: cristobalpri...@gmail.com To: janzar1...@live.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com do you have both users configured under the same phone system ? 2011/6/19 John Anzar janzar1...@live.com Hi yes i had a sip trunk to CUC from my previous exercise. But i have remove that. Under the users of the CUC i can see the extension configurations fine. I'm forwarding it to the vm pilot. Thanks -- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:00:36 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUC issue From: cristobalpri...@gmail.com To: janzar1...@live.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com do you have a sip trunk integration ? if you open up RTMT to check the vm ports what's the forwarding extension ? 2011/6/19 John Anzar janzar1...@live.com Hi Guys, i'm doing some testing on the unity connection. i have created the users at the CUCM and i have intergrate CUC with the CUCM. ports registered and everything is fine. But i have an strange issue. From user-a when i dial voicemail it will ask for the pin. But for the user-b its giving standard message *Hello*: Cisco *Unity Connection Messaging System*. From *a touchtone phone you may dial* an extension at *any* time. But i have check the configuration of the both users. its 100% identical. I wonder what is this. Any idea ? Best Regards John ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] interesting post
twice in San Jose going for my third in San Jose 2011/6/19 Vega Wong vega2...@yahoo.com.au hi guys Where did you attempt your lab exam? Cheers --- On *Mon, 20/6/11, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com* wrote: From: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] interesting post To: George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Monday, 20 June, 2011, 7:01 AM that's why i said it's interesting, i didn't mean anything else 2011/6/19 George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comhttp://mc/compose?to=gogli...@gmail.com ohhh, don't get me started on this one mate... I could say much... too much. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com http://mc/compose?to=cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3380695#3380695 what do you think ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC - hit and miss
i had run into similar problems and what i had to do to resolve the problem is reset the sip trunk in CUCM 2011/6/15 Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com did i write hit and miss? sorry, it shoudl be read as hit or miss. On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, Is there any gottcha for CUPC to see the presence of another phone when it goes off hook? I have done CUPS integration almost 6-7 times. Sometime the presence of another phone going off hook is displayed on CUPC and sometime not. If the CUPS integration is done today, then presence of contact in CUPC will be working perfectly fine for this integration. if tomorrow, i follow the same procedure for new integration for new lab, it will not work whether i reboot CUPS or not. The contact in CUPC is added from User Web Interface on CUPS. Has anyone come across similar situation? Another issue with CUPC is voicemail. Sometime to refresh the indication of arrival of new voicemail on CUPC, i need to log out of CUPC and log back in. Sometime the referesh of new voicemail will happen without logout/login to CUPC. Voicemail integration seems to be working for every CUPC integration I have done. There is no hit and miss like contact presence raised above. Thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST - Phones should work same as it isregistered with CUCM
for calling name you will need to use cme in srst mode and use either auto provision all or dn and then force your failover so the router will create the ephones and ephone-dn configs and then you will have to edit the ephone-dn to get the calling name 2011/6/15 Randall Crumm randall.cr...@flextronics.com ** ** I would add softkeys as well.. ** ** Randall ** ** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Greg *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:53 AM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST - Phones should work same as it isregistered with CUCM ** ** Can anyone give suggestion on how to meet the requirement of Phones should work same as it is registered with CUCM? It's a very broad topic since there are so many features on CUCM. Here's what I can think of: 1) Basic call routing (phone to phone, intra and inter sites, PSTN calls) both outgoing and incoming. 2) Secondary dial tone 3) Voicemail (voicemail button, voicemail pilot number, CFwd Busy, CFwd No answer) 4) multi-channel support, hold, conference. 5) Do we need to care about corporate directory? How about calling names in SRST mode? Thanks! Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP summer time
personally i do EST, EDT or PST, PDT 2011/6/18 Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com i think is just a label, EST, EDT or it could be whatever you want 2011/6/18 Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com Hi All, Question regarding NTP summer time. I configure summertime as per IPexpert material: clock timezone EST -8 clock summer EST recurr However, many places i have seen this to be configured as: clock timezone EST -8 clock summer EDT recurr Which one shoud be done in exam? Any clue? thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP Concept
if they don't tell you to configure NTP on Branch 1 is up to you if they're saying to source it from the loopback then issue the command ntp source loopback0 if they don't tell you anything is up to you you can use the CUE as an NTP, indeed is the default you can also use the HQ-RTR as an NTP source, in that case the ntp master command will be needed 2011/6/17 sandeep.ra...@wipro.com Hi , If the question says HQ-RTR should be synchronised with external NTP server. CUCM should be synchronised with HQ-RTR's Loopback0 or VLAN interface. My config on HQ RTR looks like : ntp server x.x.x.x external ntp server ntp source loopback0 clock timezone clock summertime recurring For BR1 RTR there is no mention in the question about wherei should synchronise the NTP, should i synchronise it with external NTP? Lets assume for BR1 i configure NTP as HQ RTR's Loopback 0 interface.Should i configure ntp source loopback 0 ? For BR 2 RTR there is no mention in the question about where i should synchronise the NTP, should i synchronise it with external NTP or can i synchronise it with the HQ RTR loopback IP? Need For NTP master on HQ-RTR is as below: If question says i need to configure NTP as HQ RTR loopback for CUE When i configure HQ-RTR (loopback 0) as the NTP server for CUE module, i would have to configure HQ RTR as an NTP master right? Can i configure CUE NTP as CME IP address, if yes in what instances can i configure it? * Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. * The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCS
i don't think that a command on the CLI will give you that info you can get that info from the GUI interface 2011/6/17 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx Hello all ** ** Canyone tell me if exist any command from CLI in CUCM to shown me that include within a Calling Search space? What Partitions are in that CCS?*** * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Thanks. ** ** -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX
i don't think you should have a problem but you can confirm with the compatibility matrix 2011/6/17 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx Hello I have doubt CUCM 7.1.3 can work Unity Connection 7.1.5 ?are compatible ** ** ** ** Thanks. ** ** -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ccme
Spa phones aré only supported on uc500 Enviado desde mi iPhone El Jun 16, 2011, a las 13:18, Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx escribió: Hello anyone know if SPA502G work CCME? can anyone send configuration example for that? Thanks La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su div ulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS Presence only showing Devices from BR1 and not HQ / Disconnecting (pending retry) under Server health
do you have your access list set on Presence or your digest credentials on that particular user ? 2011/6/14 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Have you checked the owner of the phone? rc -- *From:* Alan Gardner agard...@ctclc.com *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Tuesday, June 14, 2011 8:12 AM *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPS Presence only showing Devices from BR1 and not HQ / Disconnecting (pending retry) under Server health Done the integration and if I go to User management and end users all of my BR1 show devices, but all my HQ phone do not show devices. I have checked my line to user association all good. I have checked my End user in cucm- all good. I have compared all of them and cannot figure out what could be different. Any ideas. [image: Description: cid:image001.png@01CC2A79.DC0E35F0] Also getting Disconnecting (pending retry) under Server health Best Regards, Alan Gardner Chief Executive Officer Current Technologies Computer Learning Center PH. 219.764.3800 agard...@ctclc.com MCT, MCSE (Messaging Security), MCSD, MSF Trainer, MCNI, MCNE, MCSA, CCNA, , ITIL CCNP, CCVP, CCIP, CCDP, CCIE # 22758, CCSI A+, MCDST, Network+, Server+, IT Project+, EBIZ, CTT+, MCDBA CCNT, CISSP, CWNA, CTP, CIW Microsoft Server 2008 Enterprise Administrator ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com image001.pngimage002.png___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I just failed the LAB 5
right on ! good luck ! 2011/6/8 adam compton com...@gmail.com I guess I'm a glutton for punishment. Scheduled for July 21st in RTP On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:50 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com wrote: Just failed the LAB 5 everybody has been talking about. I felt very prepared, but not for that test. Alot of things that IPExpert has never touched. That sucks cuz I was trying to use them solely. I feel like I'm going to have to throw down more money for a different study guide... Anywho, I was wondering what the chances are to get the same lab twice. If you take a lab, is it pretty much disqualified from you repeating it? Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ringlist.xml and List.xml
what if you have the subscriber working as a TFTP as well ? 2011/6/8 Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com I still don't follow you. If your DHCP has Publisher as TFTP, then why would you change the RingList on some other tftp server instead of on Publisher. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Randall, IF we do not do step 5 then the phone in question will continue to point to old TFTP server which does not have a modified Ringlist.xml file. If the question is to delete a particular ringtone from Phone7 at Site Z. Then you need to direct Phone7 at Site Z to a TFTP server which has the modified Ringlist.xml file. Instead of manually changing TFTP address on phone, you can assign different TFTP using DHCP server for a particualr MAC address. -adil On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.comwrote: I don't understand why step 5. Dont you have the phones pointing to that server already? If you talk about CME phones, then the ringlist must be uploaded to CME, not CUCM. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Adil Shaikh adil.sha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi All, There are two simple questions (easy score points) raised in some ccie voice forums. They are add Background Image (create List.xml) on a phone and Removal a particular Ringtone (edit Ringlist.xml) from a phone. For BGimage 7965 admin guide shows the clear example of List.xml file. However, for the removal of particular ringtone from Ringlist.xml, i am practicing following method. If anyone know another method then could you please let me know. 1) ssh to PUB and issue command file view tftp Ringlist.xml 2) Copy 110 lines to notepad and remove appropriate tag lines and save it on desktop as Ringlist.xml 3) Go to CM OS admin page and upload Ringlist.xml in / directory of non-tftp running CM. 4) Start TFTP service on that CM 5) Change TFTP address on the phone to point to a above CM. This is manually changing TFTP address which was originally assigned from DHCP server. Thanks -adil -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 -- .. . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . -- Randall da ill Saborio CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity connection : USER ID should not be asked
go to advanced, conversation unckeck the option Request Entry of User ID after Failed Password Entry from Known Extension 2011/6/7 Julien Krieger krieger.jul...@gmail.com Hi Rahul, There is an option to uncheck in advanced config menu. Recently, someone, posted on thé same subject... Julien Le 7 juin 2011 à 20:05, Rahul Kapor rahul.kapo...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi All, trying to achieve following things when user is hitting voice mail and entering wrong password , user is prompt to enter USER ID but user should be prompted for PIN again not for USER ID ! how to achieve this . thx, Rahul ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Port number document location
very cool thank you George 2011/6/6 Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Awesome George Thx Sent from my iPhone On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:11 AM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, No need to remember all ports by memory at all... You have all tools available in IOS to lookup ports: h323 signalling: VOICEGW#show ip port-map h323 Default mapping: h323 tcp port 1720 system defined h323 RAS: VOICEGW#show ip port-map h225ras Default mapping: h225ras udp port 1719 system defined h323 GK mcast discovery: VOICEGW#show ip port-map h225rasmcast Default mapping: h225rasMcast udp port 1718 system defined SCCP: VOICEGW#show ip port-map skinny Default mapping: skinny tcp port 2000 system defined MGCP: VOICEGW#show ip port-map mgcp Default mapping: mgcp udp port 2427 system defined MGCP backhaul: VOICEGW#show ccm-manager backhaul Backhaul Link info: Link Protocol: TCP Remote Port Number: 2428 SIP: VOICEGW#show ip port-map sip Default mapping: sip udp port 5060 system defined Default mapping: sip tcp port 5060 system defined This is quicker than going into documentation to find ports... Hope this helps, On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:21 AM, adam compton com...@gmail.com com...@gmail.com wrote: There is a guide on cisco's website that lists all the ports you will need to know for the test. RTP, MGCP, CTI, etc. Here is the link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/7_0/CCM_7.0PortList.pdf http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/port/7_0/CCM_7.0PortList.pdf If you have to navigate to it (wink wink poke poke) follow this path: Voice and Unified Communications IP Telephony Call Control Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CallManager) Maintain and Operate Maintain and Operate Guides Cisco Unified Communications Manager 7.0 TCP and UDP Port Usage Regards, Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comwww.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comwww.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP Debug in CUCM
thanks guys 2011/6/3 Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com It's feasible as you don't need to gather the trace file - you get the same output in CLI as with debug udp on the router (packets received and sent on BOOTP/BOOTC udp ports), but my method is indeed more time consuming. I need to check the other method with syslog messages. Thanks. On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 19:01, Adam Frankel (afrankel) afran...@cisco.comwrote: Packet capture on CUCM CLI: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-11599 Not really feasible for lab purposes IMO. You can also see the DHCP activity in the UCM syslog: file tail activelog syslog/messages HTH, Adam Frankel Customer Support Engineer Unified Communications Infrastructure +1,919-392-7936 9am-5pm EDT (GMT -4) CCVP, RHCE, CUP Specialist Onshift Weekend Office Hours: 8am-1:30pm EDT Original Message-- From: Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com findko...@gmail.com Sent: Fri, Jun 03, 2011 11:51:03 Am To: Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu cfrider...@netcore.lu CC: CCIE VOICE ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP Debug in CUCM Much better solution, thanks! :) On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:52, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.luwrote: Something very fast and easy ;-) Debug ip udp on the hq router or br1 router depending for which site dhcp pub is asking for ….. [image: netcore_signature_4.jpg] *Claude FRIDERICH * PreSales Voice over IP * *** *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]* CCIE Voice #29035 *O*ffice** +352 31 33 80 – 407** *M*obile ** +352 621 303 616** [image: cid:image003.jpg@01CC1F87.400817E0] *F*ax ** +352 31 33 80 412 %2B352%2031%2033%2080%20412 *E*mail** *cfrider...@netcore.lu x...@netcore.lu*** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Miron Kobelski *Sent:* vendredi 3 juin 2011 08:03 *To:* Cristobal Priego *Cc:* CCIE VOICE *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP Debug in CUCM Utils network capture On Jun 3, 2011 1:55 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: how do you do the packet capture from the cucm cli ? 2011/6/2 Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com Hi, I was unable to find anything better then packet capture on CUCM CLI - it allows you to see if the DHCP messages hit the CUCM and are sent back, but not much more ;) best regards On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:45, John Anzar janzar1...@live.com wrote: Hi Guys I have a very basic question about DHCP. most of the time this works with out any issue. Is there anyway that we can DHCP debug in CUCM ?? Can we get the mac biind with the IP form CUCM ? Best Regards J anzar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com image/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpeg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Meet-me
no it cant. it has to be initiated from a phone ip session (ipcelerate) can do the oposite. they call it reverse meet me 2011/6/6 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx Hello I need to know if the feature Meet-me can initiate for first call from PSTN Gateway instead of cisco ip phone, when Gw have a DID to number meet-me. Thanks. -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group
if you have local route groups when the user logs in to a phone using EM it will use the LRG of the DP that yo associated to the device. because on the device profile you can't assign a device pool. you can indeed use the line device approach where you allow on the device calling search space and block on the line and if you share the same dialplan between sites you shouldn't have any problems i have used EM and LRG on real life for a few customers and it works pretty well 2011/6/6 Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com I though the CSS on device pool mean for Device Mobility only, not for Extension Mobility? -- *From:* Brian btmulg...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie ccieqqhttps://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=enshva=1#inbox/13060d89e4fd6644if y...@yahoo.com cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Mon, June 6, 2011 1:06:09 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group hi - re EM call routing path: we can use device mobility to flip to the roaming device pool to support this. hth. Brian Sent from my iPad On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:05, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Kiwi. On a side note, calling number transformation has to be handled at RL level in order to different calling number requirements (local, ld and intl)? Also, two RPs (\+1919.XXX placed in two different partitions) have to be configured if Site B has a requirement of TEHO for 919 area code? *From:* Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 11:39:36 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group In that case, you have a great time of converting everything to e164. =P Use called party transformation to strip them into the correct digits at the gateway level. Example : Site A ( local area code 919) --- calls to local number is 8123123 Converted the dialed number to +19198123123 Use a route pattern +.! and send to local route group At each gateway, use called party transformation. Match +1.919! , called transformation mask XXX for Site A gateway At Site B, you will strip predot for the other called party transformation. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com cci...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Ahmed for your help. Yes, I agree that CSS has to be at the line level. However, the assumption is that HQ and BR1 have configured call routing via Standard Local Route Group. When logged in to EM service, the user would not be able to use his original local gateway because the current local gateway is based on Device Pool settings. As a result, his local/long distance call might not be correct. Any suggestion? Thanks, -- *From:* Ahmed Ellboudy ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.comcci...@yahoo.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 1:53:46 PM *Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group Hi, I think you need to use Line device approach rule which will solve it by open every calls types local/national and international and makes the EM to limit your access,refer to the SRND in this point Thanks Regards; Ahmed Mahmoud Ellboudy -- *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com on behalf of Qq Ccie *Sent:* Sun 6/5/2011 6:31 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group Anyone has any thoughts of the interaction between Extension Mobility and Local Route Group? Assuming HQ and BR1 have configured call routing via Local Route Group. Any suggestions? Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any malicious code or virus being passed on. Views expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of Raya.If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group
if you have your calling/called party transformation you can also use globalized dialing when you you log in with EM the only change on the phone is going to be the settings assigned to the line, those settings will be overwritten by the device profile. 2011/6/6 Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com Thanks Cristobal. So Globalized dialing is a prerequisite as well? -- *From:* Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* Brian btmulg...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Mon, June 6, 2011 3:00:42 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group if you have local route groups when the user logs in to a phone using EM it will use the LRG of the DP that yo associated to the device. because on the device profile you can't assign a device pool. you can indeed use the line device approach where you allow on the device calling search space and block on the line and if you share the same dialplan between sites you shouldn't have any problems i have used EM and LRG on real life for a few customers and it works pretty well 2011/6/6 Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com I though the CSS on device pool mean for Device Mobility only, not for Extension Mobility? -- *From:* Brian btmulg...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie ccieqqhttps://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=enshva=1#inbox/13060d89e4fd6644if y...@yahoo.com cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Mon, June 6, 2011 1:06:09 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group hi - re EM call routing path: we can use device mobility to flip to the roaming device pool to support this. hth. Brian Sent from my iPad On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:05, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Kiwi. On a side note, calling number transformation has to be handled at RL level in order to different calling number requirements (local, ld and intl)? Also, two RPs (\+1919.XXX placed in two different partitions) have to be configured if Site B has a requirement of TEHO for 919 area code? *From:* Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 11:39:36 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group In that case, you have a great time of converting everything to e164. =P Use called party transformation to strip them into the correct digits at the gateway level. Example : Site A ( local area code 919) --- calls to local number is 8123123 Converted the dialed number to +19198123123 Use a route pattern +.! and send to local route group At each gateway, use called party transformation. Match +1.919! , called transformation mask XXX for Site A gateway At Site B, you will strip predot for the other called party transformation. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com cci...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Ahmed for your help. Yes, I agree that CSS has to be at the line level. However, the assumption is that HQ and BR1 have configured call routing via Standard Local Route Group. When logged in to EM service, the user would not be able to use his original local gateway because the current local gateway is based on Device Pool settings. As a result, his local/long distance call might not be correct. Any suggestion? Thanks, -- *From:* Ahmed Ellboudy ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.comcci...@yahoo.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 1:53:46 PM *Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group Hi, I think you need to use Line device approach rule which will solve it by open every calls types local/national and international and makes the EM to limit your access,refer to the SRND in this point Thanks Regards; Ahmed Mahmoud Ellboudy -- *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com on behalf of Qq Ccie *Sent:* Sun 6/5/2011 6:31 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group Anyone has any thoughts of the interaction between Extension Mobility and Local Route Group? Assuming HQ and BR1 have configured call routing via Local Route Group. Any suggestions? Disclaimer: NOTICE The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. Raya
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group
you're not roaming when you use extension mobility because the DP never changes if we need to localize the dialing for the user, then i will use the CSS of the device profile. 2011/6/6 Brian Mulgrew btmulg...@gmail.com Guys - just on this topic; if we had a question which required extension mobility be configured on an HQ phone (with no mention of roaming between sites) would we still be expected to update the dial plan to support HQ localised dialling from a BR1 phone? any thoughts appreciated. thks On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: if you have your calling/called party transformation you can also use globalized dialing when you you log in with EM the only change on the phone is going to be the settings assigned to the line, those settings will be overwritten by the device profile. 2011/6/6 Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com Thanks Cristobal. So Globalized dialing is a prerequisite as well? -- *From:* Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* Brian btmulg...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Mon, June 6, 2011 3:00:42 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group if you have local route groups when the user logs in to a phone using EM it will use the LRG of the DP that yo associated to the device. because on the device profile you can't assign a device pool. you can indeed use the line device approach where you allow on the device calling search space and block on the line and if you share the same dialplan between sites you shouldn't have any problems i have used EM and LRG on real life for a few customers and it works pretty well 2011/6/6 Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com I though the CSS on device pool mean for Device Mobility only, not for Extension Mobility? -- *From:* Brian btmulg...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie ccieqqhttps://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=enshva=1#inbox/13060d89e4fd6644if y...@yahoo.com cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Mon, June 6, 2011 1:06:09 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group hi - re EM call routing path: we can use device mobility to flip to the roaming device pool to support this. hth. Brian Sent from my iPad On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:05, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Kiwi. On a side note, calling number transformation has to be handled at RL level in order to different calling number requirements (local, ld and intl)? Also, two RPs (\+1919.XXX placed in two different partitions) have to be configured if Site B has a requirement of TEHO for 919 area code? *From:* Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 11:39:36 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group In that case, you have a great time of converting everything to e164. =P Use called party transformation to strip them into the correct digits at the gateway level. Example : Site A ( local area code 919) --- calls to local number is 8123123 Converted the dialed number to +19198123123 Use a route pattern +.! and send to local route group At each gateway, use called party transformation. Match +1.919! , called transformation mask XXX for Site A gateway At Site B, you will strip predot for the other called party transformation. On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.com cci...@yahoo.com wrote: Thanks Ahmed for your help. Yes, I agree that CSS has to be at the line level. However, the assumption is that HQ and BR1 have configured call routing via Standard Local Route Group. When logged in to EM service, the user would not be able to use his original local gateway because the current local gateway is based on Device Pool settings. As a result, his local/long distance call might not be correct. Any suggestion? Thanks, -- *From:* Ahmed Ellboudy ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com ahmed_ellbo...@rayacorp.com *To:* Qq Ccie cci...@yahoo.comcci...@yahoo.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Sun, June 5, 2011 1:53:46 PM *Subject:* RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Extension Mobility and Local Route Group Hi, I think you need to use Line device approach rule which will solve it by open every calls types local/national and international and makes the EM to limit your access,refer to the SRND in this point Thanks Regards; Ahmed Mahmoud Ellboudy -- *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com on behalf of Qq Ccie *Sent:* Sun 6/5/2011 6:31 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] TCL IVR
you can use B-ACD 2011/6/6 Santiago Figueroa sfigue...@mnet.com.mx Hello I have doubt is possible to have a TCL IVR work in Gateway but if the flash it fail then to send calls to IVR in Unity in automatic? Thnaks -- La información incluida en este mensaje y sus anexos es CONFIDENCIAL y para USO EXCLUSIVO de sus destinatarios. No está permitida su divulgación y/o reproducción sin autorización. Si ha recibido este mensaje y no le incumbe, le rogamos nos los comunique y proceda a su borrado. Gracias. Information included in this e-mail and attached files is CONFIDENTIAL and only for the EXCLUSIVE USE of the receivers. Circulation and/or copy without permission is not allowed. If you have received this e-mail and you are not the intended recipient, please let us know and erase the message and attached files. Thank you. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] study partners
hello guys I took my 2nd attempt lab attempt on Friday and i just got my score i failed with 77% i'm a bit disappointed but willing to give it a try 1 more time i'm located in california i'm willing to give it a try in july the week of the 18th i need to check the dates i think that's the closest one please let me know if you're interested ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP Debug in CUCM
how do you do the packet capture from the cucm cli ? 2011/6/2 Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com Hi, I was unable to find anything better then packet capture on CUCM CLI - it allows you to see if the DHCP messages hit the CUCM and are sent back, but not much more ;) best regards On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 16:45, John Anzar janzar1...@live.com wrote: Hi Guys I have a very basic question about DHCP. most of the time this works with out any issue. Is there anyway that we can DHCP debug in CUCM ?? Can we get the mac biind with the IP form CUCM ? Best Regards J anzar ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] drop packets from 3750 output queue 2
I agree with Bartosz and Steve's answers i'd check the threshold and associate COS 4 to Queue 2 on a either threshold 1 or 2 and then modify the threshold to be 60% or whatever they're asking 2011/6/2 Steve Denney (stdenney) stden...@cisco.com CoS 4,6,7 are probably mapped to queue 2 threshold 2. Just move CoS 4 to queue 2 threshold **1**, then make sure the threshold settings for queue 2 are 60 100 100 100 (the last 3 values aren’t critical, you just need the 60 so that CoS 4 packets are dropped starting at threshold 1 – 60%). cheers, sd *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2011 1:10 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] drop packets from 3750 output queue 2 I have a switch qos item I am not sure how to address: When queue 2 reaches 60% capacity COS 4 packets should be dropped. COS 4,6,7 is mapped to queue 2. any ideas? Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab
will it be also valid to use the command ntp source lo0 for example ? or if you use the command above you risk the points ? 2011/6/2 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu Check the time-zone they ask for and if this time-zone contains a daylight saving time (compare to the geographical sites), you have to put the clock summertime command as well. If this site doesn’t contain a Daylight Saving Time, not necessary to put this command ….. Normally you gonna find out on which site you have to …. Regards, [image: netcore_signature_4.jpg] *Claude FRIDERICH * PreSales Voice over IP * *** *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]* CCIE Voice #29035 *O*ffice** +352 31 33 80 – 407** *M*obile ** +352 621 303 616** [image: cid:image003.jpg@01CC1F87.400817E0] *F*ax ** +352 31 33 80 412 *E*mail** *cfrider...@netcore.lu x...@netcore.lu*** *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* jeudi 2 juin 2011 02:32 *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP on the lab When I took the test last time I used the clock timezone command and the ntp server command to setup ntp. I did not get points for this question. If the question on the Lab doesn't say anything about clock summertime, should we throw the command in anyway on the routers? I know clock summertime without any options uses US daylight savings time dates, but not sure if those would apply to other timezones as well. As best I can tell, I've heard of Hong Kong and UK and US as sites. Regards, Adam Compton -- This email was Anti Virus checked. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com image003.jpgimage004.jpgimage001.jpg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] drop packets from 3750 output queue 2
mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 60 100 100 400 mls qos que-set ouput queue set # threshold queue-id drop-threshold1 drop-threshold2 reserved-threshold maximum-threshold 2011/6/2 adam compton com...@gmail.com So I did a little bit of reading. Auto QOS was mapping COS values to the queues at threshold 3. I mapped COS 4 to queue 2 threshold 2: mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 2 4 So I know that the command is something like someone listed: mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 60 100 100 400 What do each of the numbers mean? From what I've seen, I don't think the last two would apply at all, but it seems like the first two are a min-max type setting. I almost understand it, but just don't get what these values are. Thanks for all the help Adam On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Steve Denney (stdenney) stden...@cisco.com wrote: CoS 4,6,7 are probably mapped to queue 2 threshold 2. Just move CoS 4 to queue 2 threshold **1**, then make sure the threshold settings for queue 2 are 60 100 100 100 (the last 3 values aren’t critical, you just need the 60 so that CoS 4 packets are dropped starting at threshold 1 – 60%). cheers, sd *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2011 1:10 PM *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] drop packets from 3750 output queue 2 I have a switch qos item I am not sure how to address: When queue 2 reaches 60% capacity COS 4 packets should be dropped. COS 4,6,7 is mapped to queue 2. any ideas? Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobility softkey to send call to cell phone
It will use the Rdo. Css to be moré specific It will use the re-routing css Enviado desde mi iPhone El Jun 1, 2011, a las 6:18, adam compton com...@gmail.com escribió: So I have mobility configured, SNR is working fine and dandy. If I make a call and press mobility softkey to send the call to my cell phone, What CSS does it use? Does is follow phone css or remote dest profile CSS? If it follows the device CSS, I could make sure that the SNR number is in a dialable format from the phone. If it uses the RDP CSS, then I could potentially have to create another route pattern. Thoughts? Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobility softkey to send call to cell phone
I usually create a route pttrn for snr Enviado desde mi iPhone El Jun 1, 2011, a las 6:18, adam compton com...@gmail.com escribió: So I have mobility configured, SNR is working fine and dandy. If I make a call and press mobility softkey to send the call to my cell phone, What CSS does it use? Does is follow phone css or remote dest profile CSS? If it follows the device CSS, I could make sure that the SNR number is in a dialable format from the phone. If it uses the RDP CSS, then I could potentially have to create another route pattern. Thoughts? Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560
i have a 3560 and i notice a difference yesterday on the QoS if you run auto QoS on the 3560 it will not configure the service policy on the port and it will not configure the priority-queue out by default this is the auto qos config output from a 3750 the highlighted items will not be configured on the 3560 when you run LAN QoS Hth interface FastEthernet0/2 switchport access vlan 12 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 11 srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust device cisco-phone mls qos trust cos auto qos voip cisco-phone spanning-tree portfast service-policy input AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone 2011/6/1 josh west west32...@gmail.com I need a switch for my lab and ideally would like to have a 3750 but from what I am reading the 3560 is very similar for what is needed on the voice lab. Can anyone confirm this or tell me what a 3750 has that the 3560 does not. Thanks in advanced. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 or 3560
yes, i did an ios upgrade before i started my journey and i was playing with qos and was looking for the policy map and i couldn't find it i need to check the ios, i'm not home now 2011/6/1 adam compton com...@gmail.com I get those commands on my 3560. are you running advanced ip services on the 3560? On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: i have a 3560 and i notice a difference yesterday on the QoS if you run auto QoS on the 3560 it will not configure the service policy on the port and it will not configure the priority-queue out by default this is the auto qos config output from a 3750 the highlighted items will not be configured on the 3560 when you run LAN QoS Hth interface FastEthernet0/2 switchport access vlan 12 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 11 srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 priority-queue out mls qos trust device cisco-phone mls qos trust cos auto qos voip cisco-phone spanning-tree portfast service-policy input AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone 2011/6/1 josh west west32...@gmail.com I need a switch for my lab and ideally would like to have a 3750 but from what I am reading the 3560 is very similar for what is needed on the voice lab. Can anyone confirm this or tell me what a 3750 has that the 3560 does not. Thanks in advanced. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN bchan selection
You can configure the router to select the first available B channel in ascending order (channel B1) or descending order (channel B23 ). By default, the router will select outgoing calls in descending order. 2011/6/1 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Just to make sure top down mean channel 23 to 1 do I would configure isdn bchan descending Thanks, randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SW VPN Vs HW VPN during the Proctor Lab Session
is not a must with soft clients sometimes you assume your config is working, so you never troubleshoot because you just can with hardware phones you can test most off the features if not all of them 2011/5/31 Ilham Jabir ciscotodi...@gmail.com Hi, Currently i am using software vpn client to connect to my rack session. Using IP Blue clients, IP Communicator etc.. to practice the work books. How ever i am confused whether i may need hardware phones to test out the specific features like + dialing, etc..moving forward. Is it a must that we will require hardware phones during the proctor lab session to test all the features? Or only the soft phones will help us till we succeed the lab? Please advice. Ilham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS
guys i have a question for your my questions is in regards to the shared bandwidth i know it's measured as a weight and whenever you have shape you ignore the value so the q2 in this case the weight is indeed 10 / (10+60+20) = so Q2 has 1/9 of the shared bandwidth right ? and this is how the config looks like interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 6 switchport voice vlan 8 srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0 mls qos trust device cisco-phone mls qos trust cos auto qos voip cisco-phone spanning-tree portfast so if the bandwith needs to be shared on q2 40 %, q3 20%, q4 40% how could i calculate or know what do i need to put on srr-queue bandwidth share command will this be an accurate config srr-queue bandwidth share 0 40 20 40 ?? thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS
thank you 2011/5/31 ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com Answer your 1st question, its 1/10th. 2nd question is correct. duy ccie #27737 voice tmobile g2 On May 31, 2011 4:19 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: guys i have a question for your my questions is in regards to the shared bandwidth i know it's measured as a weight and whenever you have shape you ignore the value so the q2 in this case the weight is indeed 10 / (10+60+20) = so Q2 has 1/9 of the shared bandwidth right ? and this is how the config looks like interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 6 switchport voice vlan 8 srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20 srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0 mls qos trust device cisco-phone mls qos trust cos auto qos voip cisco-phone spanning-tree portfast so if the bandwith needs to be shared on q2 40 %, q3 20%, q4 40% how could i calculate or know what do i need to put on srr-queue bandwidth share command will this be an accurate config srr-queue bandwidth share 0 40 20 40 ?? thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SW VPN Vs HW VPN during the Proctor Lab Session
yes no problem i know 2 guys that got their ccie voice and they were only using soft phones 2011/5/31 Ilham Jabir ciscotodi...@gmail.com So i can re use the 2$$$ to purchase few 100 hrs of proctor lab session instead of buying the partial hardware which i will use during the rack session. Bottom line is that we can survive with only with soft phones proctor labs for practicing the work books prepare for the exam. Thanks Ilham On 01-Jun-2011, at 1:03 AM, Cristobal Priego wrote: is not a must with soft clients sometimes you assume your config is working, so you never troubleshoot because you just can with hardware phones you can test most off the features if not all of them 2011/5/31 Ilham Jabir ciscotodi...@gmail.com Hi, Currently i am using software vpn client to connect to my rack session. Using IP Blue clients, IP Communicator etc.. to practice the work books. How ever i am confused whether i may need hardware phones to test out the specific features like + dialing, etc..moving forward. Is it a must that we will require hardware phones during the proctor lab session to test all the features? Or only the soft phones will help us till we succeed the lab? Please advice. Ilham ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QoS
hello all, I have a question for you guys hopefully you can help me understand, this is way too confusing for me when i issue auto qos on a 3750 switch this is how the config will look like mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3 6 7 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 2 4 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 2 1 mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 1 threshold 3 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 2 threshold 3 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 3 threshold 3 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 1 8 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 mls qos srr-queue output dscp-map queue 4 threshold 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 1 138 138 92 138 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 138 138 92 400 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 3 36 77 100 318 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 4 20 50 67 400 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 1 149 149 100 149 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 118 118 100 235 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 3 41 68 100 272 mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 4 42 72 100 242 mls qos queue-set output 1 buffers 10 10 26 54 mls qos queue-set output 2 buffers 16 6 17 61 mls qos when i'm asked to change the COS or DSCP values from Q to Q how do I know which threshold to use ? for exambple if i'm asked to configure the COS valus 2,3 to Queue 4 how do i know on which threshold withing Q4 ? does my question make sense ? this part of the threshold is very confusing for me hopefully you can help me out thanks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm
do you recall the subject ? I can't find it i found some qos discussions, however it was related to LAN qos thank you 2011/5/30 Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com I believe it was about the first week of May ;) On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.luwrote: Hi, Look at the forum history, I spoke about this issue and how to manage and resolve this issue a couple of week ago …. ;-) *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]*** *NETCORE PSF S.A.*** 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 15:45 *To:* Cristobal Priego *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm I've noticed that if you reload BR1 router, it takes a long time for OSPF to populate the routes again. I've had to wait like 5-10 minutes before for the routes to get back on the router. That could possibly be what you're seeing. If that is the case, you should be able to ping the serial interfaces between HQ and BR1, but nothing else on HQ or BR2. Adam Compton On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: hello all while doing a mock lab i needed to configure LLQ, MLP LFI cRTP between BR1 and HQ, the bw was 384 when i issued auto qos voip trust fr-atm on both interfaces, after setting the BW on the inferfaces everything was great, no problem however once i reloaded the BR1 router i lost connectivity to the HQ site i reloaded HQ router and still no connectivity so i reverted my pod and resstarted again only with QOS i set the BW and ran the command again without any customization and the same issue happened, where i lost connectivity from BR1 to HQ do you guys know how to fix this ? thank you ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com image001.jpg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm
I found it just in case somebody else is interested this is exactly what happened to me and indeed Friderich described quite well i'm going to copy paste the issue and the solution that he found As I configure qos with MLP LFI between hq and br2 everything was working fine !!! After rebooting, no serial access anymore between hq and br2….. With *show ip interface brief* I have the following protocol state : *HQ* Interface IP-AddressOK? Method StatusProtocol Virtual-Access1 *10.10.112.1*YES TFTP up down *BR2* Interface IP-AddressOK? Method StatusProtocol Virtual-Access1* 10.10.112.2*YES TFTP up down onclusion: On HQ, Just have to put the command line no frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ppp Virtual-Template100 and shut the Serial interface 0/1/0 and put the command frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ppp Virtual-Template100 and no shut to make it work again Hope this can help you during the real lab … Think it’s the easiest solution to make it work …. Have to keep this in mind J And again, thanks to all for your remarks and suggestions i'm going to give this a try in 15 mins i just need to have all the infrastructure stuff fixed 2011/5/30 Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com do you recall the subject ? I can't find it i found some qos discussions, however it was related to LAN qos thank you 2011/5/30 Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com I believe it was about the first week of May ;) On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu wrote: Hi, Look at the forum history, I spoke about this issue and how to manage and resolve this issue a couple of week ago …. ;-) *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]*** *NETCORE PSF S.A.*** 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 15:45 *To:* Cristobal Priego *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm I've noticed that if you reload BR1 router, it takes a long time for OSPF to populate the routes again. I've had to wait like 5-10 minutes before for the routes to get back on the router. That could possibly be what you're seeing. If that is the case, you should be able to ping the serial interfaces between HQ and BR1, but nothing else on HQ or BR2. Adam Compton On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: hello all while doing a mock lab i needed to configure LLQ, MLP LFI cRTP between BR1 and HQ, the bw was 384 when i issued auto qos voip trust fr-atm on both interfaces, after setting the BW on the inferfaces everything was great, no problem however once i reloaded the BR1 router i lost connectivity to the HQ site i reloaded HQ router and still no connectivity so i reverted my pod and resstarted again only with QOS i set the BW and ran the command again without any customization and the same issue happened, where i lost connectivity from BR1 to HQ do you guys know how to fix this ? thank you ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com image001.jpg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm
I just tried it and this is what happens I reloaded the router and i don't have connectivity to BR1 now, so i started on the HQ router this is how my interface looks before i make the change interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 384 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/1:0-201 auto qos voip trust fr-atm R1#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. R1(config)#interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point R1(config-subif)#sh R1(config-subif)#no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 as soon as I enter that command I get the Errors below: no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. AutoQoS Error: the following command could not be parsed: no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 R1(config-subif)# *May 31 01:51:19.535: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Virtual-Template200, changed state to administratively down R1(config-subif)# When I try to re-enter the Command on the sub interface this is what i get: R1(config-subif)#frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 %vtemplate error; failed to set up PPP-FR circuit R1(config-subif)# and my interface looks like this : ! interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 384 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore shutdown snmp trap link-status end 2011/5/30 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu For MLP LFI, if you create the virtual-template manually (no auto-qos), it’s going to work. If not, just got to “frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200” and put no frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200 Shut the serial interface. Put frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200 again and no shut the Serial Interface. Do this manipulation on the 2 sites configured with MLP. But for the Lab, normally you just have to reload the routers to make it work. Check with show policy-map interface to make sure that the policy-map is good configured and that you have traffic for sig and RTP Regards, *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]*** *NETCORE PSF S.A.*** 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 22:13 *To:* Bill Lake *Cc:* Friderich Claude; adam compton; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm do you recall the subject ? I can't find it i found some qos discussions, however it was related to LAN qos thank you 2011/5/30 Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com I believe it was about the first week of May ;) On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu wrote: Hi, Look at the forum history, I spoke about this issue and how to manage and resolve this issue a couple of week ago …. ;-) *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]* *NETCORE PSF S.A.* 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 15:45 *To:* Cristobal Priego *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm I've noticed that if you reload BR1 router, it takes a long time for OSPF to populate the routes again. I've had to wait like 5-10 minutes before for the routes to get back on the router. That could possibly be what you're seeing. If that is the case, you should be able to ping the serial interfaces between HQ and BR1, but nothing else on HQ or BR2. Adam Compton On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: hello all while doing a mock lab i needed to configure LLQ, MLP LFI cRTP between BR1 and HQ, the bw was 384 when i issued auto qos voip trust fr-atm on both interfaces, after setting the BW on the inferfaces everything was great, no problem however once i reloaded the BR1 router i lost connectivity to the HQ site i reloaded HQ router and still no connectivity so i reverted my pod and resstarted again only with QOS i set the BW and ran the command again without any customization and the same issue happened, where i lost connectivity from BR1 to HQ do you guys know how to fix this ? thank you ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question--RC
did you reset the Trunk after you made the change on Service Parameters ? If you have a GK on the lab and if it's telling you to use 1720 and your output doesn't show port 1720 2011/5/30 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com Thanks for all the answers. I did search the services for 1720 and entered gk-trunk. I'm working on WB2 lab 2 and the output from the PG shows port 1720 and my output shows 40081 and 33277 respectively below. The questions in the WB has output and says the port should show 1720 no 40081 and 33277. This is what I am trying to do. The PG did not specify anything specific as well. Should I not worry about this? Randall -- *From:* Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com *To:* Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com *Cc:* Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Monday, May 30, 2011 12:07 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper question CCM service Device Name of GK-controlled Trunk That Will Use Port 1720; just type the trunk name. Rgs, Roger Carpio. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, How do I get gk-trunk_1 and 2 to repflect port 1720? Thanks, Randall HQ-RTR(config)#do show gatekeeper gw GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 3* Zone HQ master gateway list: 10.10.110.3:1720 BR2-RTR Prefix: 1#* Zone HQ master gateway list: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 Zone HQ prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 5: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 Zone HQ prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 5: 10.10.210.10:40081 GK-TRUNK_1 10.10.210.11:33277 GK-TRUNK_2 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE/CME
no when you do the initial setup for CUE it indeed request a user id/password, the last step on the setup those are the credentials that you should use the user/name password set under telephony-service that's indeed user for the integration 2011/5/30 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com HI, Here is a dumb question, but causing me issues. My cue is stable and I can log in to the web page with the user from the cue cli. Now when I start the initialization wizard I keep getting login to CME as administrator failed. check CME config. Am I suppose to use the user under tele-service? In my case admin/c1sc0123? snip-its ip http server ip http authentication local no ip http secure-server ip http path flash:/GUI telephony-service max-ephones 7 max-dn 7 ip source-address 10.10.110.3 port 2000 voicemail 3600 max-conferences 8 gain -6 call-forward pattern .T web admin system name admin password c1sc0123 dn-webedit transfer-system full-consult transfer-pattern . transfer-pattern .T ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm
thanks i indeed found the Thread i finally got it working what's happening in my case is when i go to the sub interface and remove the line frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 the virtual-tempate is gone so i need to recreate the template first interface Virtual-Template200 bandwidth 384 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0 ppp multilink ppp multilink interleave ppp multilink fragment delay 10 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust end then go back to the sub interface re-issue the command frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 and i get the connectivity back : ) I feel much better now. 2011/5/30 Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg21425.html On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 22:13, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: do you recall the subject ? I can't find it i found some qos discussions, however it was related to LAN qos thank you 2011/5/30 Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com I believe it was about the first week of May ;) On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu wrote: Hi, Look at the forum history, I spoke about this issue and how to manage and resolve this issue a couple of week ago …. ;-) *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]*** *NETCORE PSF S.A.*** 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 15:45 *To:* Cristobal Priego *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm I've noticed that if you reload BR1 router, it takes a long time for OSPF to populate the routes again. I've had to wait like 5-10 minutes before for the routes to get back on the router. That could possibly be what you're seeing. If that is the case, you should be able to ping the serial interfaces between HQ and BR1, but nothing else on HQ or BR2. Adam Compton On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: hello all while doing a mock lab i needed to configure LLQ, MLP LFI cRTP between BR1 and HQ, the bw was 384 when i issued auto qos voip trust fr-atm on both interfaces, after setting the BW on the inferfaces everything was great, no problem however once i reloaded the BR1 router i lost connectivity to the HQ site i reloaded HQ router and still no connectivity so i reverted my pod and resstarted again only with QOS i set the BW and ran the command again without any customization and the same issue happened, where i lost connectivity from BR1 to HQ do you guys know how to fix this ? thank you ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com image001.jpg___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm
yes you're right that's what i'm going to do i have never configure it manually so it's a good practice will the qos srnd will tell me how to configure it ? I usually use auto qos, because i'm afraid i'm going to forget something but its something that i'd definitely want to do configure it manually if you know any doc that will let me know how to configure it please let me know i'd really appreciated it thanks 2011/5/30 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu This is because you configured with auto-qos. You have to create it manually and it is good for your training and understanding ;-) *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]*** *NETCORE PSF S.A.*** 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 22:55 *To:* Friderich Claude *Cc:* Bill Lake; adam compton; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm I just tried it and this is what happens I reloaded the router and i don't have connectivity to BR1 now, so i started on the HQ router this is how my interface looks before i make the change interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 384 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/1:0-201 auto qos voip trust fr-atm R1#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. R1(config)#interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point R1(config-subif)#sh R1(config-subif)#no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 as soon as I enter that command I get the Errors below: no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. AutoQoS Error: the following command could not be parsed: no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 R1(config-subif)# *May 31 01:51:19.535: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Virtual-Template200, changed state to administratively down R1(config-subif)# When I try to re-enter the Command on the sub interface this is what i get: R1(config-subif)#frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 %vtemplate error; failed to set up PPP-FR circuit R1(config-subif)# and my interface looks like this : ! interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 384 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore shutdown snmp trap link-status end 2011/5/30 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu For MLP LFI, if you create the virtual-template manually (no auto-qos), it’s going to work. If not, just got to “frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200” and put no frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200 Shut the serial interface. Put frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200 again and no shut the Serial Interface. Do this manipulation on the 2 sites configured with MLP. But for the Lab, normally you just have to reload the routers to make it work. Check with show policy-map interface to make sure that the policy-map is good configured and that you have traffic for sig and RTP Regards, *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]* *NETCORE PSF S.A.* 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 22:13 *To:* Bill Lake *Cc:* Friderich Claude; adam compton; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm do you recall the subject ? I can't find it i found some qos discussions, however it was related to LAN qos thank you 2011/5/30 Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com I believe it was about the first week of May ;) On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu wrote: Hi, Look at the forum history, I spoke about this issue and how to manage and resolve this issue a couple of week ago …. ;-) *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]* *NETCORE PSF S.A.* 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *adam compton *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 15:45 *To:* Cristobal Priego *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm I've noticed that if you reload BR1 router, it takes a long time for OSPF
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm
thank you very much 2011/5/30 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu Not so difficult … Check the config with auto-qos and copy paste on notepad Reload the router without saving your config Put your BW in the sub Serial interface Put frame-relay traffic-shaping in your Serial Interface Create your map-class (BR2 for example) Create your own virtual-template (virtual-template 1 for example) Put no ip address and no frame-relay interface-dlci on the sub interface Replace with “frame-relay interface-dlci 202 ppp Virtual-Template1” (for example) Put the new map-class with the name you configured above Don’t forget to apply your policy on the virtual-template Should work …. *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]*** *NETCORE PSF S.A.*** 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 23:23 *To:* Friderich Claude *Cc:* Bill Lake; adam compton; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm yes you're right that's what i'm going to do i have never configure it manually so it's a good practice will the qos srnd will tell me how to configure it ? I usually use auto qos, because i'm afraid i'm going to forget something but its something that i'd definitely want to do configure it manually if you know any doc that will let me know how to configure it please let me know i'd really appreciated it thanks 2011/5/30 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu This is because you configured with auto-qos. You have to create it manually and it is good for your training and understanding ;-) *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]* *NETCORE PSF S.A.* 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent:* lundi 30 mai 2011 22:55 *To:* Friderich Claude *Cc:* Bill Lake; adam compton; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm I just tried it and this is what happens I reloaded the router and i don't have connectivity to BR1 now, so i started on the HQ router this is how my interface looks before i make the change interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 384 ip ospf mtu-ignore snmp trap link-status frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/1:0-201 auto qos voip trust fr-atm R1#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. R1(config)#interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point R1(config-subif)#sh R1(config-subif)#no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 as soon as I enter that command I get the Errors below: no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. AutoQoS Error: the following command could not be parsed: no frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 R1(config-subif)# *May 31 01:51:19.535: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Virtual-Template200, changed state to administratively down R1(config-subif)# When I try to re-enter the Command on the sub interface this is what i get: R1(config-subif)#frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200 %vtemplate error; failed to set up PPP-FR circuit R1(config-subif)# and my interface looks like this : ! interface Serial0/0/1:0.1 point-to-point bandwidth 384 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0 ip ospf mtu-ignore shutdown snmp trap link-status end 2011/5/30 Friderich Claude cfrider...@netcore.lu For MLP LFI, if you create the virtual-template manually (no auto-qos), it’s going to work. If not, just got to “frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200” and put no frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200 Shut the serial interface. Put frame-relay interface-dlci 102 ppp Virtual-Template200 again and no shut the Serial Interface. Do this manipulation on the 2 sites configured with MLP. But for the Lab, normally you just have to reload the routers to make it work. Check with show policy-map interface to make sure that the policy-map is good configured and that you have traffic for sig and RTP Regards, *Claude Friderich* *PreSales Support* *CCIE Voice #29035* *[image: CCIEVoice_UseLogo]* *NETCORE PSF S.A.* 49 rue du Baerendall B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer Téléphone: +352 31 33 80 407 Fax: +352 31 33 80 412 GSM: +352 621 303 616 E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] *Sent
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP with CUE
I just tested it too and it works with the transcoder as Randall said 2011/5/30 Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com Hey guys, just to bring up an old discussion. Had to prove to myself if transcoder would work as RSVP and it works just fine for me. Not sure what you may be missing, but I got it to work the following way: BR2: dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 codec g729br8 rsvp maximum sessions 4 associate application SCCP BR2-RTR#show dspfarm dsp active SLOT DSP VERSION STATUS CHNL USE TYPERSC_ID BRIDGE_ID PKTS_TXED PKTS_RXED 02 23.6.1 UP 1USED xcode 1 0x38130 364 02 23.6.1 UP 1USED xcode 1 0x39431 299 Total number of DSPFARM DSP channel(s) 1 BR2-RTR#show ip rsvp reservation ToFrom Pro DPort Sport Next Hop I/F Fi Serv BPS 10.20.110.1 10.20.110.3 UDP 18280 19100 10.20.112.1 Se0/1/0. FF LOAD 24K 10.20.110.3 10.20.110.1 UDP 19100 18280 none none FF LOAD 24K HQ will be exactly the same. What you must take care of when using transcoder and RSVP on same profile, is that on Region configuration it is important that the transcoders are forced g729 with each other, and then g711 towards the local device. IOS transcoder will always break if tries to talk g729 to one device and g729 towards the other. On my tests, you can notice it reserved g729 and on the phones if I hit the stats, would bring g711ulaw as that's what is talking towards the transcoder. On HQ site, it was valid to replace the transcoder with an mtp too, but BR2 I left it as transcoder and still worked. Cheers! Randall S. 2011/5/19 voice boy voice...@hotmail.com Again you do it Solved :) , you deserve a lot -- CC: ill2...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com From: gogli...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP with CUE Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:20:12 +0100 To: voice...@hotmail.com Hi voice boy, Do not use xcoder for RSVP. I do not think you would be able to do RSVP and transcoding at the same time with the same dspfarm profile. Do the following: Configure MTP for RSVP again in the following manner: dspfarm profile 1 MTP no codec g711ulaw codec g729r codec passthrough rsvp maximum session software 10 no shutdown And on the CUE side configure xcoder resource with g711 and g729r codec too. It should work now, The problem with RSVP MTP agent is that between sites it normally uses passthrough codec which means endpoints do the codec negotiation. But when the codec negotiation fails between endpoints, like in case of call to CUE, the the RSVP MTP agent needs to negotiate the codec itself, and it tries to negotiate g711 codec because by default that is what it has configured, but it fails because regions have g729 codec limitation. So in MTP RSVP agent after passthrough you must have the codec that you use between sites. In your case g729, but it could be iLBC maybe or anything else. Regards, Sent from my iPad On 19 May 2011, at 19:18, voice boy voice...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Randl, I use this configuration on both sides HQ and BR router that contain the CUE: dspfarm profile 1 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw codec g729ar8 codec g729abr8 codec g729r8 codec passthrough rsvp maximum sessions 3 associate application SCCP hq-rsvp in is HQ-DP [hq-region] br-rsvp is in BR-DP [br-region] both RSVP agents are in different regions, so they talking G729 So I don't know why CUE don't take benefit of the transcoder when it need or RSVP can't invode transcoder !!! -- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:52:46 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP with CUE From: ill2...@gmail.comill2...@gmail.com To: voice...@hotmail.comvoice...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.comccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Take into consideration that the RSVP provisioning is only happening on the route path between the RSVP agents. The CUE itself is outside of the RSVP path. Perhaps what could matter is the codec chosen between the RSVP agents. Whats the region configured between the RSVP agents? Make sure it is G729. What are you using for RSVP agent on HQ? mtp or transcoder? share the config to check. 2011/5/19 voice boy voice...@hotmail.comvoice...@hotmail.com Hi, I'm testing RSVP between 2-ites using RSVP locations It work good and AAR route the call as expected Also TEHO calls consume from the RSVP bw Only the problem is with the CUE at remote site that i think cause it use G711u I was using MTP for RSVP , then when the call forwarded to CUE,, it give not enough bw , call rerouting ,, although there still bw in rsvp I decide to use transcoder as rsvp profile to solve CUE codec issue, But when it is forwarded to CUE, nothing occue
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCME/CUE
clear the line do a show users and the connection to cue might be in use once you know which line you're using do a clear line X and then try to get to cue again 2011/5/29 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com HI, I'm having a weird issue. (see snipits below) I configured mt CME for CUE(not telephony-service yet) and I cannot ser ser 0/0 ses to it I can ping 10.10.202.2 from hq rtr The cli just has a blank like Anyone have an ideas or run into this? Thanks, Randall interface Service-Engine0/0 ip unnumbered Vlan400 service-module ip address 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.0 service-module ip default-gateway 10.10.202.1 ip route 10.10.202.2 255.255.255.255 Service-Engine0/0 interface Vlan400 ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] uccx prompts
i re-configured my script using the default icd.aef and eveyrhing worked great thanks 2011/5/29 Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com I'd check ip routing. rtp from uccx may be routed to the gw, but not to the ip phones? On May 29, 2011 3:50 AM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE integrated with UCM
thank you 2011/5/29 Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com If you stop the UCM service this is the behavior. If you shut down the WAN interface then the CTI RP/P will re-register. -- Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: *vma...@ipexpert.com *Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat * http://www.ipexpert.com/chat* IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities *http://www.ipexpert.com/communities* and our public website at www.ipexpert.com *http://www.ipexpert.com/* From: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 19:06:45 -0700 To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE integrated with UCM hello i'm working on workbook 2 lab 10 i have the cue configured, registered with ucm, and everything works great when i go into srst mode, everything works great however when i failback to UCM my cti ports, cti route point doesn't register automatically, unless i reload CUE is this expected ? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs SRST ACLs
cool !! thank you i'll try them today 2011/5/28 adam compton com...@gmail.com For any body who needs them, here are some acls I use to test full SRST functionality BR1 access-list 150 deny ip 10.10.201.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 150 deny ip host 10.10.110.2 any access-list 150 deny ip host 192.168.10.18 any(local phone ip address) access-list 150 permit ip any any HQ: access-list 150 deny ip 10.10.200.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 150 deny ip host 10.10.110.1 any access-list 150 deny ip host 192.168.10.18 any(local phone ip address) access-list 150 permit ip any any BR2: access-list 150 deny ip 10.10.202.0 0.0.0.255 any access-list 150 deny ip host 10.10.110.3 any access-list 150 deny ip host 192.168.10.18 any(local phone ip address) access-list 150 permit ip any any apply as follows: int fa0/0.30 ip access-group 150 out You will need to bind MGCP to the loopback interface, but that's required half the time anyway. Adam Compton ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST mode auto-provision
you will have to implemente access list for SRST to work properly or create a new ccm-group with the pub server only assign the ccm-group to the proper device pool and when you're ready to test srst just stop the ccm service on the pub 2011/5/29 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com HI, Just wondering if it should make a difference if I am running a HW VPN because my phones will not register in SRST mode. I tried several ways to put br1 rtr in srst no luck. I've even manually configured the rtr with ephones and ephone-dn's Everything looks configured correctly on CUCM too. snipit.. telephony-service srst mode auto-provision all max-ephones 3 max-dn 3 ip source-address 10.10.110.2 port 2000 Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST mode auto-provision
on your phone check the network settings do they have an SRST reference ? 2011/5/29 Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com I did the latter but with the sub and it did not work Randall Sent from my iPhone On May 29, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: you will have to implemente access list for SRST to work properly or create a new ccm-group with the pub server only assign the ccm-group to the proper device pool and when you're ready to test srst just stop the ccm service on the pub 2011/5/29 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.comrrcr...@yahoo.com HI, Just wondering if it should make a difference if I am running a HW VPN because my phones will not register in SRST mode. I tried several ways to put br1 rtr in srst no luck. I've even manually configured the rtr with ephones and ephone-dn's Everything looks configured correctly on CUCM too. snipit.. telephony-service srst mode auto-provision all max-ephones 3 max-dn 3 ip source-address 10.10.110.2 port 2000 Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comwww.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST mode auto-provision
in the lab you can shut down the WAN interface you can't do that with proctorlabs 2011/5/29 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.com yes. I'm going to try tomorrow I just need to know the bestway to do this in the lab. Randall -- *From:* Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com *To:* Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com *Cc:* Online Study ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Sent:* Sunday, May 29, 2011 6:23 PM *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST mode auto-provision on your phone check the network settings do they have an SRST reference ? 2011/5/29 Rrcrumm rrcr...@yahoo.com I did the latter but with the sub and it did not work Randall Sent from my iPhone On May 29, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com wrote: you will have to implemente access list for SRST to work properly or create a new ccm-group with the pub server only assign the ccm-group to the proper device pool and when you're ready to test srst just stop the ccm service on the pub 2011/5/29 Randall Crumm rrcr...@yahoo.comrrcr...@yahoo.com HI, Just wondering if it should make a difference if I am running a HW VPN because my phones will not register in SRST mode. I tried several ways to put br1 rtr in srst no luck. I've even manually configured the rtr with ephones and ephone-dn's Everything looks configured correctly on CUCM too. snipit.. telephony-service srst mode auto-provision all max-ephones 3 max-dn 3 ip source-address 10.10.110.2 port 2000 Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit http://www.ipexpert.comwww.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out http://www.PlatinumPlacement.comwww.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto qos voip trust fr-atm
hello all while doing a mock lab i needed to configure LLQ, MLP LFI cRTP between BR1 and HQ, the bw was 384 when i issued auto qos voip trust fr-atm on both interfaces, after setting the BW on the inferfaces everything was great, no problem however once i reloaded the BR1 router i lost connectivity to the HQ site i reloaded HQ router and still no connectivity so i reverted my pod and resstarted again only with QOS i set the BW and ran the command again without any customization and the same issue happened, where i lost connectivity from BR1 to HQ do you guys know how to fix this ? thank you ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
