RE: Test
Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
Ooh, I like horror books. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
I'm waiting eagerly for publication :-) -Original Message- From: Amit Zinman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 09:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Ooh, I like horror books. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
Another good one is to let your IS and/or logfile space run out very rapidly from a mail loop (use blat or the reskit simulation tools for the loop). See if you really can get that server back up and running with some extra disks within your SLA period the mail loop cleared up before it goes down again! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 October 2001 18:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] You could also use a hex editor to fsk up some bits and bytes on the IS. Take some big chunks out -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Listserver, Exchange MSER:EX Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] If you mess around with Disk Caching setting for your array controller and fake a power failure, or turn on NT disk compression on your database drive, you should see the dreaded -1018 error on your next backup. Steve Smith MCSE Information Technology Services Division Ministry of Management Services Province of British Columbia email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (250) 387-8698 -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Hmmm ... Had not run across that yet. And here I thought I'd been checking out all the resources from the list. :-( Cool stuff in there and in the directory above it: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/ It maybe in there [only took a quick peek], but what I want to do is find ways to realistically break a lab machine that would mimic real-life problems that require the use of the tools in the whitepages and techniques. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] go find the disaster recovery whitepapers. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.a sp http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery.a sp Keep them close to your heart at all times. The methods there are like the Ten Commandments. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Never laugh at anyone's dreams. People who don't have dreams don't have much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanborn, John Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Thanks to everyone and MSKB[1], I now have backups that I KNOW are good. Next step now, is to learn how to fix Exchange. I know there are a few million ways to break Exchange, but what would be the best for learning the repair tools in a lab environment? The hardware stuff 'should' be straight-forward. Break it - ID it - Repair/ Replace/ Restore - Reboot. The software and DB corruption would need to be more careful to avoid getting into a 'Restore is only option' situation. Any Ideas? Thanks John [1] Q146306 - Exchange Server Backup Restore Procedures Q179308 - How To Verify Exchange Online Backups Q152313 - Using the AT Backup Command with Microsoft Exchange -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NTBackup Our bat file reads: ntbackup backup z:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\curly IS \\curly /b /hc:on /t Normal /l C:\winnt\backup.log ntbackup eject z:\exchsrvr is because we are a clustered enviroment, hence Larry, Moe, Curly, Curly being the virtual node, Larry and Moe are the actual nodes. Our only problem has been lately is that our store has exceeded tape capacity, and we have to click on OK the next morning to finish up the backup on the next tape. sorry, no haiku. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTBackup Iron Chef Haiku [1] Subtle textures not seen here And no steeenking rhymes ntbackup rules I should say in most cases Small vexing problem on just one server all drives don't go on one tape space not the issue when each drive is done wants new tape for the next drive command line follows ntbackup backup c: d: e: ds \\server is \\server /v /r /b /e /l d:\backup\backup.log /hc:on /t normal /v verify /r restricts access /b backs up local registry /e log includes exceptions only /l backup log filename /hc:on Hardware compression on /t normal (full) backup not using the slash-a backup acts
RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
In my experience, I just leave my house exchange server on for long enough and that'll make it go splat :-) -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 10:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Another good one is to let your IS and/or logfile space run out very rapidly from a mail loop (use blat or the reskit simulation tools for the loop). See if you really can get that server back up and running with some extra disks within your SLA period the mail loop cleared up before it goes down again! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 October 2001 18:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] You could also use a hex editor to fsk up some bits and bytes on the IS. Take some big chunks out -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Listserver, Exchange MSER:EX Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] If you mess around with Disk Caching setting for your array controller and fake a power failure, or turn on NT disk compression on your database drive, you should see the dreaded -1018 error on your next backup. Steve Smith MCSE Information Technology Services Division Ministry of Management Services Province of British Columbia email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (250) 387-8698 -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Hmmm ... Had not run across that yet. And here I thought I'd been checking out all the resources from the list. :-( Cool stuff in there and in the directory above it: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/ It maybe in there [only took a quick peek], but what I want to do is find ways to realistically break a lab machine that would mimic real-life problems that require the use of the tools in the whitepages and techniques. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] go find the disaster recovery whitepapers. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.a sp http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery.a sp Keep them close to your heart at all times. The methods there are like the Ten Commandments. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Never laugh at anyone's dreams. People who don't have dreams don't have much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanborn, John Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Thanks to everyone and MSKB[1], I now have backups that I KNOW are good. Next step now, is to learn how to fix Exchange. I know there are a few million ways to break Exchange, but what would be the best for learning the repair tools in a lab environment? The hardware stuff 'should' be straight-forward. Break it - ID it - Repair/ Replace/ Restore - Reboot. The software and DB corruption would need to be more careful to avoid getting into a 'Restore is only option' situation. Any Ideas? Thanks John [1] Q146306 - Exchange Server Backup Restore Procedures Q179308 - How To Verify Exchange Online Backups Q152313 - Using the AT Backup Command with Microsoft Exchange -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NTBackup Our bat file reads: ntbackup backup z:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\curly IS \\curly /b /hc:on /t Normal /l C:\winnt\backup.log ntbackup eject z:\exchsrvr is because we are a clustered enviroment, hence Larry, Moe, Curly, Curly being the virtual node, Larry and Moe are the actual nodes. Our only problem has been lately is that our store has exceeded tape capacity, and we have to click on OK the next morning to finish up the backup on the next tape. sorry, no haiku. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTBackup Iron Chef Haiku [1] Subtle textures not seen here And no steeenking rhymes ntbackup rules I should say in most cases Small vexing problem on just one server all drives don't go on one tape space not the issue when each drive is done wants new tape for the next drive command line follows ntbackup
Exchange and various things about it..
Hi all, Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-) Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the floppy drive? A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange 2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only imagine it's just looking around for something it can't find or perhaps something it would like to find. Secondly, during the weekend the server just stopped responding. Exchange was allowing me to work from two machines in the house, but when I tried to log in from one of the other 8, it failed. NT would not allow me in for a start, then when it got past that problem (Trying to find the profile on the server) Exchange wanted verification of my user/pass/domain. It refused to let me in even then. A couple of reboots and all was well, but it caused some concern. Does this happen to anyone else? Thanks in advance, Joe! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange prompts for authentication every 10 minutes
We had a similar problem - traced it to the offline folders, just delete those and re-create and the problem went away. For us it started after we moved people from one server to another. HTH Keith -Original Message- From: Chris T Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 October 2001 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange prompts for authentication every 10 minutes this is weird. NT 4 domain. 1 pdc, and 2 bdc's, one bdc is remote across 256k pipe. Exchange 5.5, SP4, 3 different servers with mailboxes in same site. None are DC's. Started happening about two weeks ago. I thought it was only happening to Office XP users, but know it is happening regularly to about 30 out of 500 mailboxes. About every 10 minutes (even though logged into the domain, about 20 on the LAN, 10 through dial-up) the Exchange server pops up the username/password/domain authentication box. No matter what you enter your password is wrong. Happened to me the first time right after I changed my password so I thought it was a domain sync issue. Doing that didnt help. You can hit cancel and go about your merry way without being denied access, but it is a pain in the @ss . . . Any ideas? TIA! -- Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send/Reply
We are a small dept within the University - approx 100 users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with latest service packs and patches, the user's workstations are running Win98 and Outlook 2000. Recently our HOD has had problems sending email to users within the University, all other email functions seem to be ok for him, sending mail to users in our dept and outside the Uni is ok, he can receive email from within the Uni but can't send or reply to these addresses, he can send/reply to addresses outside the Uni and within the dept. This problem started for him about 2 weeks ago and I can't figure out what's causing it. No one else is affected, our other users can send and receive ok anywhere. I setup a profile for HOD on another computer but the results were the same, I thought it may be something to do with his profile on exchange server so after backing up I deleted all reference to him from NT and Exchange, about an hour later I setup his NT account using the copy function in user manager to copy an existing account and then setup his email account and imported the mail but still the problem persists. Any help appreciated. Thanks Ty Bradley Computing Officer University of Strathclyde Dept. of Management Science 40 George Street Glasgow G1 1QE Phone: 0141 548 4304 Fax: 0141 552 6686 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send/Reply
NDR? Error messages? Please post them. -Original Message- From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send/Reply We are a small dept within the University - approx 100 users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with latest service packs and patches, the user's workstations are running Win98 and Outlook 2000. Recently our HOD has had problems sending email to users within the University, all other email functions seem to be ok for him, sending mail to users in our dept and outside the Uni is ok, he can receive email from within the Uni but can't send or reply to these addresses, he can send/reply to addresses outside the Uni and within the dept. This problem started for him about 2 weeks ago and I can't figure out what's causing it. No one else is affected, our other users can send and receive ok anywhere. I setup a profile for HOD on another computer but the results were the same, I thought it may be something to do with his profile on exchange server so after backing up I deleted all reference to him from NT and Exchange, about an hour later I setup his NT account using the copy function in user manager to copy an existing account and then setup his email account and imported the mail but still the problem persists. Any help appreciated. Thanks Ty Bradley Computing Officer University of Strathclyde Dept. of Management Science 40 George Street Glasgow G1 1QE Phone: 0141 548 4304 Fax: 0141 552 6686 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send/Reply
Are these 'problem' users in his personal address book - possibly with an old invalid address ? -Original Message- From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send/Reply We are a small dept within the University - approx 100 users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with latest service packs and patches, the user's workstations are running Win98 and Outlook 2000. Recently our HOD has had problems sending email to users within the University, all other email functions seem to be ok for him, sending mail to users in our dept and outside the Uni is ok, he can receive email from within the Uni but can't send or reply to these addresses, he can send/reply to addresses outside the Uni and within the dept. This problem started for him about 2 weeks ago and I can't figure out what's causing it. No one else is affected, our other users can send and receive ok anywhere. I setup a profile for HOD on another computer but the results were the same, I thought it may be something to do with his profile on exchange server so after backing up I deleted all reference to him from NT and Exchange, about an hour later I setup his NT account using the copy function in user manager to copy an existing account and then setup his email account and imported the mail but still the problem persists. Any help appreciated. Thanks Ty Bradley Computing Officer University of Strathclyde Dept. of Management Science 40 George Street Glasgow G1 1QE Phone: 0141 548 4304 Fax: 0141 552 6686 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential and/or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and various things about it..
Not familiar with your first issue, but your second problem is consistent with a locked account/expired password... I could be miles off, but it's identical behaviour to what I see with Exch 5.5 -- Jad Mouracadé [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and various things about it.. Hi all, Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-) Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the floppy drive? A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange 2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only imagine it's just looking around for something it can't find or perhaps something it would like to find. Secondly, during the weekend the server just stopped responding. Exchange was allowing me to work from two machines in the house, but when I tried to log in from one of the other 8, it failed. NT would not allow me in for a start, then when it got past that problem (Trying to find the profile on the server) Exchange wanted verification of my user/pass/domain. It refused to let me in even then. A couple of reboots and all was well, but it caused some concern. Does this happen to anyone else? Thanks in advance, Joe! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Yeah, we call that the weekend. -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Nah as in just mail from everywhere. Must have been something going on that everyone in the world was invited to, but I wasn't :-( -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yeah, we call that the weekend. -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
ha ha hah aa ROFL :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: 29 October 2001 05:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yeah, we call that the weekend. -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave xchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Here's a thought: If you think your Internet EMAIL is down, why not TEST to a FREE webbased email system like HOTMAIL? That way you only bother yourself, and not the 4000 people on this list. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yeah, we call that the weekend. -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send/Reply
This is an example of the message received, it's always the same format and the last line MSEXCH: IMS always contains the same information. I've tried looking in Technet for any of the numbers listed but can't seem to find anything on this particular problem. The users he's trying to send to are on the general distribution list that everyone has access to, at the moment he has to forward the message to his secretary to send, and she sends using the same list. He said he was able to send to these addresses ok and then all of a sudden they were being bounced back. --- The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 17/10/01 08:59 Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=strathuni;l=SIGMA-011017075724Z-6251 MSEXCH:IMS:strathuni:mansci:SIGMA 3550 (000B09AA) 550 rejected: administrative prohibition -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send/Reply Are these 'problem' users in his personal address book - possibly with an old invalid address ? -Original Message- From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send/Reply We are a small dept within the University - approx 100 users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with latest service packs and patches, the user's workstations are running Win98 and Outlook 2000. Recently our HOD has had problems sending email to users within the University, all other email functions seem to be ok for him, sending mail to users in our dept and outside the Uni is ok, he can receive email from within the Uni but can't send or reply to these addresses, he can send/reply to addresses outside the Uni and within the dept. This problem started for him about 2 weeks ago and I can't figure out what's causing it. No one else is affected, our other users can send and receive ok anywhere. I setup a profile for HOD on another computer but the results were the same, I thought it may be something to do with his profile on exchange server so after backing up I deleted all reference to him from NT and Exchange, about an hour later I setup his NT account using the copy function in user manager to copy an existing account and then setup his email account and imported the mail but still the problem persists. Any help appreciated. Thanks Ty Bradley Computing Officer University of Strathclyde Dept. of Management Science 40 George Street Glasgow G1 1QE Phone: 0141 548 4304 Fax: 0141 552 6686 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential and/or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite your bigshot attitude! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Thank you Andy! His email is about as clear as the Potomac River! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox? P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. You stated : It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right now, just to add hard drive! That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space, not: I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email.(Which you stated later) Andy -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I don't have time for this kinda BS. Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either! Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to. Maybe you should try there... Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself. However, we've been around here for quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with. I wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!? My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen others over a GB. Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. Item #6: Apparently not. Not likely. Waaahh... Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator 1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her. Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her. 2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??! Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you call yourself a computer professional??! 3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did! 4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's not because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because: A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to listen to me. B) It doesn't want to spend money. C) It's not a high priority D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company to know what I'm talking about. 5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email. 6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my stuff well enough. I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in return was insult from you and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from others, except one person, who was actually trying to help me out. 7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems. Apparently, you don't follow this model. You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori is stupid and can't read. I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary for you. Call me what you want, think of me what you may... Fact still remains, you're housing improperly configured servers and clients. I more than get it, you can't dignify anything because you have nothing useful to dignify. Configure your sh!t properly and then come
RE: Test
Y'know Bob, he might even find that in the FAQ... -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 08:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Here's a thought: If you think your Internet EMAIL is down, why not TEST to a FREE webbased email system like HOTMAIL? That way you only bother yourself, and not the 4000 people on this list. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yeah, we call that the weekend. -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send/Reply
I believe that your HOD is being blocked somewhere externally (as the message is going through the IMS). It looks as though his address is blocked by your main servers (I assume that you route all other non-departmental mail through to a central system). Speak to the mail admins for the rest of the Uni and find out what they have done! Tris - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems and Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send/Reply This is an example of the message received, it's always the same format and the last line MSEXCH: IMS always contains the same information. I've tried looking in Technet for any of the numbers listed but can't seem to find anything on this particular problem. The users he's trying to send to are on the general distribution list that everyone has access to, at the moment he has to forward the message to his secretary to send, and she sends using the same list. He said he was able to send to these addresses ok and then all of a sudden they were being bounced back. --- The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 17/10/01 08:59 Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=strathuni;l=SIGMA-011017075724Z-6251 MSEXCH:IMS:strathuni:mansci:SIGMA 3550 (000B09AA) 550 rejected: administrative prohibition -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send/Reply Are these 'problem' users in his personal address book - possibly with an old invalid address ? -Original Message- From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send/Reply We are a small dept within the University - approx 100 users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with latest service packs and patches, the user's workstations are running Win98 and Outlook 2000. Recently our HOD has had problems sending email to users within the University, all other email functions seem to be ok for him, sending mail to users in our dept and outside the Uni is ok, he can receive email from within the Uni but can't send or reply to these addresses, he can send/reply to addresses outside the Uni and within the dept. This problem started for him about 2 weeks ago and I can't figure out what's causing it. No one else is affected, our other users can send and receive ok anywhere. I setup a profile for HOD on another computer but the results were the same, I thought it may be something to do with his profile on exchange server so after backing up I deleted all reference to him from NT and Exchange, about an hour later I setup his NT account using the copy function in user manager to copy an existing account and then setup his email account and imported the mail but still the problem persists. Any help appreciated. Thanks Ty Bradley Computing Officer University of Strathclyde Dept. of Management Science 40 George Street Glasgow G1 1QE Phone: 0141 548 4304 Fax: 0141 552 6686 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential and/or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send/Reply
administrative prohibition = he's being blocked. Try contacting the Graham.Mcdonald2Strath.ac.uk, and find out why their email system is blocking your user. -Original Message- From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send/Reply This is an example of the message received, it's always the same format and the last line MSEXCH: IMS always contains the same information. I've tried looking in Technet for any of the numbers listed but can't seem to find anything on this particular problem. The users he's trying to send to are on the general distribution list that everyone has access to, at the moment he has to forward the message to his secretary to send, and she sends using the same list. He said he was able to send to these addresses ok and then all of a sudden they were being bounced back. --- The following recipient(s) could not be reached: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 17/10/01 08:59 Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=strathuni;l=SIGMA-011017075724Z-6251 MSEXCH:IMS:strathuni:mansci:SIGMA 3550 (000B09AA) 550 rejected: administrative prohibition -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send/Reply Are these 'problem' users in his personal address book - possibly with an old invalid address ? -Original Message- From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Send/Reply We are a small dept within the University - approx 100 users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with latest service packs and patches, the user's workstations are running Win98 and Outlook 2000. Recently our HOD has had problems sending email to users within the University, all other email functions seem to be ok for him, sending mail to users in our dept and outside the Uni is ok, he can receive email from within the Uni but can't send or reply to these addresses, he can send/reply to addresses outside the Uni and within the dept. This problem started for him about 2 weeks ago and I can't figure out what's causing it. No one else is affected, our other users can send and receive ok anywhere. I setup a profile for HOD on another computer but the results were the same, I thought it may be something to do with his profile on exchange server so after backing up I deleted all reference to him from NT and Exchange, about an hour later I setup his NT account using the copy function in user manager to copy an existing account and then setup his email account and imported the mail but still the problem persists. Any help appreciated. Thanks Ty Bradley Computing Officer University of Strathclyde Dept. of Management Science 40 George Street Glasgow G1 1QE Phone: 0141 548 4304 Fax: 0141 552 6686 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * ** Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential and/or privileged. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or disclose them or any part of their contents to any person or organisation; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error immediately and delete this e-mail and its attachments from your computer system. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and its attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free * ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: GAL Web Tool Question
Give them 'modify user attributes' on the mailbox container level. This works in my environment of Exchange 5.5 SP4 and IIS 4.0. - Mort Billups Crowley Maritime Corporation -Original Message- From: Saul Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GAL Web Tool Question Do they have a GAL Web tool that works with Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GAL Web Tool Question Service Acct Admin permissions that is...Oh, I'm assuming 5.5 based upon the Q article -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GAL Web Tool Question I could be wrong here, but I think you'll need to give them Service Acct level permissions. -Original Message- From: Saul Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GAL Web Tool Question Out of curiosity, what version of Exchange are you using? -Original Message- From: Bollhofer, Mary I. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GAL Web Tool Question I have installed the GAL Web Tool on an IIS 5.0 server (followed Q242223). I then assigned the Human Resource group permission to the Directory on the IIS server as well as to the virtual directory. (Our firm decided that we do not wish to grant all our user's permission to modify their own GAL entries. Only members of the Human Resource department.) When any member of the Human Resources uses the GAL Modify Web tool, they are able to only modify their own entries in the GAL. When they try to update any other entry, they receive a window which states the following: Microsoft Internet Explorer Error Number 80070005 Error Description: OK The Error Description above is blank. There is no description displayed. This error occurs when the user clicks on the Save User Info button after modifying another user's GAL information. All of the members in the human resource department can edit their own GAL entries but no one else's. The Human Resource group permissions on the Folder that holds the ASP pages is as follows: Modify Read Execute List Folder Contents Read Write On the Virtual Directory we are using Basic authentication only. Does anyone know what I have done incorrectly or what I have left out? PLEASE NOTE: IF I add the human resource users to the EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATORS GROUP then they are able to edit any GAL entry and do not receive the above error. What kind of permissions do I need to give these members on the Exchange Server Side of things? I DO NOT WANT THEM TO BE MEMBERS OF THE EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATORS GROUP. Please help. Mary ___ This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain information that is protected by law as privileged and confidential, and is transmitted for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying or retention of this e-mail or the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or reply e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail from your computer system. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Re: Exchange and various things about it..
Well, I would scout around for configuration settings that point to your floppy drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and various things about it.. Hi all, Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-) Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the floppy drive? A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange 2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only imagine it's just looking around for something it can't find or perhaps something it would like to find. Secondly, during the weekend the server just stopped responding. Exchange was allowing me to work from two machines in the house, but when I tried to log in from one of the other 8, it failed. NT would not allow me in for a start, then when it got past that problem (Trying to find the profile on the server) Exchange wanted verification of my user/pass/domain. It refused to let me in even then. A couple of reboots and all was well, but it caused some concern. Does this happen to anyone else? Thanks in advance, Joe! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
I thought the biggest mistake KMart ever made was moving the popcorn machine way back into the Little Caesars corner [1]. This is from someone whose mom regularly took him to the S. S. Kresge luncheon counter. [1] The second-biggest mistake. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I wont set foot in Kmart. Call me a snob, but I wont do it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Didn't KMart sell guns? Martin - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB Users 1200 mailboxes 1300 No issues yet. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? IS = 14g Users = approx 300 Largest mailbox = 545,793k (and, no, it's not mine)[1] Oh, and Jason? Are you a size queen? :-) [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing.
RE: Haiku Friday
I'll have to take your word for it on the gaelic - nice job! -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Oiche na Samhna ann Solas na gheallaigh thar bharr Siuil an mactire thart Samhain Night is here Light of the moon overhead The wolf roams the earth Wowdid it in Gaelic and English...not bad. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Samhain approaches My anticipation grows Spells and chanting, soon. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday My boss insisted on disclaimers in our mail. He would not relent. I ate his liver with fava beans (slight pause) and a nice Chianti. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT Gaelic (Was:Re:Haiku Friday)
This is obviously Scottish or French Gaelic or reeealy bad Irish Gael. :) E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: 29 October 2001 06:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I'll have to take your word for it on the gaelic - nice job! -Original Message- From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Oiche na Samhna ann Solas na gheallaigh thar bharr Siuil an mactire thart Samhain Night is here Light of the moon overhead The wolf roams the earth Wowdid it in Gaelic and English...not bad. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Samhain approaches My anticipation grows Spells and chanting, soon. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday My boss insisted on disclaimers in our mail. He would not relent. I ate his liver with fava beans (slight pause) and a nice Chianti. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000
One MAPI public store. You can have more non-MAPI public stores as long as they're within the one storage group. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 one public store. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! If you think you are experiencing a memory leak, please be aware that memory leaks may not be what they appear to be. You may discover that a memory leak is really not a memory leak but a performance enhancement - MS KB article 268343 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WebMeister Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 no public store? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 You're limited to a single priv.edb and a single storage group. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: WebMeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 The limit on Std version is 16GB per database. on Std version are you limited on the number of storage groups on a server? on Std version is your limit still 6 databases per storage group or is it less? Any explicit references ont this you can recomend? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and various things about it..
you wouldn't by chance have OL97 loaded on that server? look at q173564 -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and various things about it.. Hi all, Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-) Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the floppy drive? A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange 2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only imagine it's just looking around for something it can't find or perhaps something it would like to find. Secondly, during the weekend the server just stopped responding. Exchange was allowing me to work from two machines in the house, but when I tried to log in from one of the other 8, it failed. NT would not allow me in for a start, then when it got past that problem (Trying to find the profile on the server) Exchange wanted verification of my user/pass/domain. It refused to let me in even then. A couple of reboots and all was well, but it caused some concern. Does this happen to anyone else? Thanks in advance, Joe! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and various things about it..
Or how about an AV product? -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and various things about it.. Hi all, Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-) Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the floppy drive? A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange 2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only imagine it's just looking around for something it can't find or perhaps something it would like to find. Secondly, during the weekend the server just stopped responding. Exchange was allowing me to work from two machines in the house, but when I tried to log in from one of the other 8, it failed. NT would not allow me in for a start, then when it got past that problem (Trying to find the profile on the server) Exchange wanted verification of my user/pass/domain. It refused to let me in even then. A couple of reboots and all was well, but it caused some concern. Does this happen to anyone else? Thanks in advance, Joe! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
at the local Super K, the popcorn machine is right by the front door! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Now, Pinky, if by any chance you are captured during this mission, remember you are Gunther Heindriksen from Appenzell. You moved to Grindelwald to drive the cog train to Murren. Can you repeat that? Mmmm, no, Brain, don't think I can. - -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I thought the biggest mistake KMart ever made was moving the popcorn machine way back into the Little Caesars corner [1]. This is from someone whose mom regularly took him to the S. S. Kresge luncheon counter. [1] The second-biggest mistake. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I wont set foot in Kmart. Call me a snob, but I wont do it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Didn't KMart sell guns? Martin - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 11:00 PM Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB
RE: Test
Well we did have a meeting of the Inner Circle. Perhaps you missed the invitation, or maybe you weren't on the guest list? Anyways, I hear Dean has started a new mail list for the Inner Circle[1] that is hosted at zzzptm.com. If you have been nominated to participate then an invitation will be forthcoming. If you don't get an invitation, then pretend you never saw this message. [1] Also known as the Secret Cabal -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Nah as in just mail from everywhere. Must have been something going on that everyone in the world was invited to, but I wasn't :-( -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yeah, we call that the weekend. -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - Luke save the Queen
Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA 2000 logoff ?
In OWA2000 there are three ways you get logged off. One is to close the browser which closes the session and clears any cached authenticated pages so no one else can use your session. Two is to wait for 4 minutes (Default timeout setting for OWA2000). Or spend a bunch off money for Messageware's solution which gives you a logoff button. Question is that a customer would like to have it so if he is browsing the web and then backspaces to the OWA2000 session (within the 4 minute timeout setting) he is forced to login again. I said I do not think there is a way around the logoff procedures other than the above ones. I was curious if SSL was installed if it changes/overrides the timeout settings. I do not really want to setup up SSL at this time as we may change the name of the server prior to cut over. Anybody have any experience with SSL and OWA2000 and logoff issues different than normal sessions? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forms library in 5.5
I've been looking through technet, but I can't seem to find out the information regarding forms that I'm looking for. Can someone tell me where I can find instructions on how to remove custom forms from the forms library? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Ah yes, the ability of a governmental body to recognize something as legitimate just because there are enough ignorant/stupid/silly/mischievous people that can write something on a form. Of course, on a list that normally contains a lot of off topic eMail, at least most of it tries to tie it back to something eMail/Exchange related. How about next time you start the thread off with something like I have lots of silly users that are circulating an eMail about writing in Jedi knight as a religion because we have lots of dolts in the UK government [1] that will actually believe them. How can I filter out this useless eMail from my Exchange system? [1] Not to imply that the UK has cornered the market on dolts in government, I believe that that exists most places. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
humph, how serious you are. Ah wellstill good news about Glastonbury for those cool enough to know what that is. I also ask you to notice that I sent the messages on a 'quite' mail day. Poppies and bourbon biscuits (as in today I will be mostly eating~) E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: 29 October 2001 08:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Ah yes, the ability of a governmental body to recognize something as legitimate just because there are enough ignorant/stupid/silly/mischievous people that can write something on a form. Of course, on a list that normally contains a lot of off topic eMail, at least most of it tries to tie it back to something eMail/Exchange related. How about next time you start the thread off with something like I have lots of silly users that are circulating an eMail about writing in Jedi knight as a religion because we have lots of dolts in the UK government [1] that will actually believe them. How can I filter out this useless eMail from my Exchange system? [1] Not to imply that the UK has cornered the market on dolts in government, I believe that that exists most places. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Bit like what most of Sir Bonfield's speeches are like then.. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 16:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anti-virus scanner
Dear Anyone, We have a dedicated Connector server (Exchange 5.5 SP2) set up which connects an Exchange 5.5 environment to a Lotus Notes environment. This server only houses a X400 Connector and a Connector for Lotus Notes (so no Mailboxes). I know there isnt an anti-virus package that can scan X400 connectors on Exchange 5.5 yet. Is there an anti-virus scanning product for the Connector for Lotus Notes on Exchange 5.5? (I have my doubts) Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
smart@ss There are even some people here that can check out rumours before repeating them to thousands of people on a mailing list. /sm@rtass http://www.snopes.com/religion/jedi.htm Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Elizabeth, I have been to Glastonbury a few times. I also visited the washroom this morning, I dont, however, feel the need to inform the other list members about it. And im afraid the connection is still crap and nothing to do with exchange however you phrase it. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 October 2001 00:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
I read it in the Independentwhich reported that Jedi Knight was given a filing number. Are you calling the beloved national canon a liar? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: 29 October 2001 08:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen smart@ss There are even some people here that can check out rumours before repeating them to thousands of people on a mailing list. /sm@rtass http://www.snopes.com/religion/jedi.htm Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Heard about the Jedi thing two months ago. On the radio whilst I was fiddling with my Exchange server. So now it's sort-of relevant to the topic. Take it to a 1-2-1 email session kidz. :-( -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 October 2001 00:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen I read it in the Independentwhich reported that Jedi Knight was given a filing number. Are you calling the beloved national canon a liar? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: 29 October 2001 08:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen smart@ss There are even some people here that can check out rumours before repeating them to thousands of people on a mailing list. /sm@rtass http://www.snopes.com/religion/jedi.htm Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Replies
Having trouble with doing a reply to all or copying my self on a message to be sent out. It goes to the other people but I don't get a message back from CC or reply to all.. We are relaying from sendmail server into Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 sp 6a. Using a aliases in the Linux world which looks like this: rknox:rknox@localhost,rknox@x-exch and my exchange address loks like this SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure what to look at any help is much appreciated. Thanks Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Glastonbury is in Star Wars? Where? :) -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 October 2001 00:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
How about next time you start the thread off with something like I have lots of silly users that are circulating an eMail about writing in Jedi knight as a religion because we have lots of dolts in the UK government [1] that will actually believe them. How can I filter out this useless eMail from my Exchange system? I should just like to point out that I am one of the dolts that work for local government. The be-a-jedi note was a text note and took up very little space. I'd be far more concerned about users sending copies of the Phantom Menace to one another. Firstly because it's a large attachment, and secondly because it's noweher near as good as Star Wars or The Empire Strikes Back :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
whats star wars? Regards James Johnston BT Ignite Solutions, eCRM Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDI : 01392 459076 Cell: 07771 738456 Fax : 01392 431025 Web : http://www.Ignite.Com/ British Telecommunications plc Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ Registered in England no. 180. This electronic message contains information from British Telecommunications plc which may be privileged and confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail (to the number or address above) immediately. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Check the FAQ. JDE -Original Message- From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: OT - Luke save the Queen whats star wars? Regards James Johnston BT Ignite Solutions, eCRM Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDI : 01392 459076 Cell: 07771 738456 Fax : 01392 431025 Web : http://www.Ignite.Com/ British Telecommunications plc Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ Registered in England no. 180. This electronic message contains information from British Telecommunications plc which may be privileged and confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail (to the number or address above) immediately. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Hm. Jedi Knight is on the list at number 896 After entry 700 - Other Religion Lumped in the 800 category with Heathen and Atheist Doesn't really count, does it? I suppose we could wait another ten years to see if we can get Sith Lord in there as well - MWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Manager
For managing Exchange 2000 from my W2k Prof. I must install Exchange System Manager snap-in from the cd by selecting to only install the management option. Question: as in Exchange 5.5, also must I install in some way Exchange 2k Service Packs or patches in the workstation ? Thanks Javier.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Replies
You need to configure your IMC to receive all of the host names used on the Sendmail side. Along with that, you might consider rerouting all of the extra hosts to your primary domain. Things will appear more seamless that way. D -Original Message- From: ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Replies Having trouble with doing a reply to all or copying my self on a message to be sent out. It goes to the other people but I don't get a message back from CC or reply to all.. We are relaying from sendmail server into Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 sp 6a. Using a aliases in the Linux world which looks like this: rknox:rknox@localhost,rknox@x-exch and my exchange address loks like this SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure what to look at any help is much appreciated. Thanks Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
I said there were dolts in government, not implying that those that support the dolts are dolts. Nor did I imply that ALL public office holders are dolts. However, if you want to align yourself with the dolts, then please feel free to do so. :-) I don't worry about users sending large multimedia files around as we block large files on all MTA's, X.400 connectors, and IMS's. [1] [1] Notice how I cleverly include actual Exchange content in this off-topic message. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen How about next time you start the thread off with something like I have lots of silly users that are circulating an eMail about writing in Jedi knight as a religion because we have lots of dolts in the UK government [1] that will actually believe them. How can I filter out this useless eMail from my Exchange system? I should just like to point out that I am one of the dolts that work for local government. The be-a-jedi note was a text note and took up very little space. I'd be far more concerned about users sending copies of the Phantom Menace to one another. Firstly because it's a large attachment, and secondly because it's noweher near as good as Star Wars or The Empire Strikes Back :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?
Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might help? This server has never locked up like this in the last 2 years, and nothing has changed recently. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
On the other hand, it has been a little slow today, now Rich T seems almost to have learnt how to use Exchange. Or at least to look in the FAQ. Or at least not to bother asking any more :) -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Elizabeth, I have been to Glastonbury a few times. I also visited the washroom this morning, I dont, however, feel the need to inform the other list members about it. And im afraid the connection is still crap and nothing to do with exchange however you phrase it. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 October 2001 00:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?
Check the event logs. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 16:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might help? This server has never locked up like this in the last 2 years, and nothing has changed recently. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?
Dollars to donuts your HD went belly-up[1]. At least that would be the first thing to check on a perfectly running Exchange server that nobody's been monkeying with. Check your event/RAID logs (whichever is appropriate). --Andrew Duey, MCSE [1] always wanted to use that phrase[2] [2] and go nutz with footnotes. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might help? This server has never locked up like this in the last 2 years, and nothing has changed recently. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Secret Cabal mailing list
Okay Dean, I've sent out invitations for the new Secret Cabal mailing list [1] to everyone that we identified and voted on. You should start seeing the Join submissions very soon. Remember we need to make sure that all new members understand that this list must remain a secret and it's subscription mailing address is never revealed. As instructed, I'm having them send a message with the text Join Secret-Cabal Name to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] As opposed to the Old Secret Cabal mailing list, which of course I disavow all knowledge and refute the actual existence thereof. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recall: Secret Cabal mailing list
Doug Hampshire would like to recall the message, Secret Cabal mailing list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Replies
In your IMS properties in Exchange, on the routing tab, add every additional domain (host) name to the routing. I configure mine to reroute to my primary domain name so all is seamless and is transparent to everyone. Don't use the email address, just use your .com. D -Original Message- From: ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Replies I am not sure what you mean by adding the host names used in Linux(ie:email address [EMAIL PROTECTED])??? Or just .com ronk You need to configure your IMC to receive all of the host names used on the Sendmail side. Along with that, you might consider rerouting all of the extra hosts to your primary domain. Things will appear more seamless that way. D -Original Message- From: ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Replies Having trouble with doing a reply to all or copying my self on a message to be sent out. It goes to the other people but I don't get a message back from CC or reply to all.. We are relaying from sendmail server into Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 sp 6a. Using a aliases in the Linux world which looks like this: rknox:rknox@localhost,rknox@x-exch and my exchange address loks like this SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure what to look at any help is much appreciated. Thanks Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recall: Secret Cabal mailing list
I'm sure he would.[1] 8-{)
...Joel
[1] Interesting that the secretary designate of the Secret Cabal doesn't
know enough about Exchange that he thought this would work.[2]
[2] Yes, I know he was kidding.[3]
[3] so am I, hence the bearded mustachioed smiley wearing glasses. [4]
[4] 8-{)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recall: Secret Cabal mailing list
Doug Hampshire would like to recall the message, Secret Cabal mailing
list.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
Hello! I am new to this subject, please bear with me. Our users would like to access their emails from outside using our dial-up connection with ATT. Once they dial to ATT they will be put on our network via our T1 connection with ATT. We do not want to use OWA. Is there any one using a similar configuration to ours (Dial-up + T1) to access emails? Could you please tell us how you have made your exchange servers available to your mobile users.? I have two email servers. One stores our users mailboxes, the other one is a connector servers with 2 connectors: Internet Service connector (For inbound mail only from 2 unix server used internally ) and an X.400 connector that forward/retrieve all outbound/inbound mails to a head server in France, which in turn will forward the emails to the Internet. We have a T1 connection with ATT and would like to use ATT DIALUP to _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
VPN... -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up Hello! I am new to this subject, please bear with me. Our users would like to access their emails from outside using our dial-up connection with ATT. Once they dial to ATT they will be put on our network via our T1 connection with ATT. We do not want to use OWA. Is there any one using a similar configuration to ours (Dial-up + T1) to access emails? Could you please tell us how you have made your exchange servers available to your mobile users.? I have two email servers. One stores our users mailboxes, the other one is a connector servers with 2 connectors: Internet Service connector (For inbound mail only from 2 unix server used internally ) and an X.400 connector that forward/retrieve all outbound/inbound mails to a head server in France, which in turn will forward the emails to the Internet. We have a T1 connection with ATT and would like to use ATT DIALUP to _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Yes, I'm still here I like Pauls Robichauxs book it help understand exchange. Also reading the post is more fun than actually posting them. I actually get to laugh with you guys instead of being laughed at. I also did post something about exchange in this off topic. HEHE -Original Message- From: Simon Axon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen On the other hand, it has been a little slow today, now Rich T seems almost to have learnt how to use Exchange. Or at least to look in the FAQ. Or at least not to bother asking any more :) -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Elizabeth, I have been to Glastonbury a few times. I also visited the washroom this morning, I dont, however, feel the need to inform the other list members about it. And im afraid the connection is still crap and nothing to do with exchange however you phrase it. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 October 2001 00:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
I have RAS,VPN -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up Hello! I am new to this subject, please bear with me. Our users would like to access their emails from outside using our dial-up connection with ATT. Once they dial to ATT they will be put on our network via our T1 connection with ATT. We do not want to use OWA. Is there any one using a similar configuration to ours (Dial-up + T1) to access emails? Could you please tell us how you have made your exchange servers available to your mobile users.? I have two email servers. One stores our users mailboxes, the other one is a connector servers with 2 connectors: Internet Service connector (For inbound mail only from 2 unix server used internally ) and an X.400 connector that forward/retrieve all outbound/inbound mails to a head server in France, which in turn will forward the emails to the Internet. We have a T1 connection with ATT and would like to use ATT DIALUP to _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
I'd create a VPN over your existing public network. -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up I am not very familiar with RAS. Do you know whether RAS will work in a configuration where I do not have a modem directly attached to the server since I have a T1 connection? My users will use a modem to dial-up to ATT global Network and be put on the T1. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
what do you have 2000, NT4 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up Go to technet and type in article Q162847 -Original Message- From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up I am not very familiar with RAS. Do you know whether RAS will work in a configuration where I do not have a modem directly attached to the server since I have a T1 connection? My users will use a modem to dial-up to ATT global Network and be put on the T1. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Event 9582
Hello all, I have run into the event entry below twice in the past month on two different servers. Everything I find on this is specific to clusters and I am not running any clusters. Q296073 states The event ID 9582 referenced in this article is only a concern for Active/Active cluster configurations. In Active/Passive configuration and non-clustered Exchange 2000 Servers this event ID 9582 can be ignored.. I would like to believe that and move on but in both situations that I've seen this my Exchange servers have stopped allowing users to login within 24 hours of the event. Has anyone else seen this? Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Event Category: Performance Event ID: 9582 Date: 10/27/2001 Time: 7:37:46 PM User: N/A Computer: EX0301 Description: The virtual memory necessary to run your Exchange server is fragmented in such a way that performance may be affected. It is highly recommended that you restart all Exchange services to correct this issue. Dave Cook Desktop Administrator Kutak Rock, LLP 402-231-8352 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## The information contained in this electronic mail transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying, printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained in it. In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments) without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. ## _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
LOL! Man that made my day! S. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I drooled on myself for most of the day while staring blankly at the monitor. Does that count as work? S. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Do too... My morning -I just had a conference call thingie. More work : -Finished off my new router config then moved my old and new T1s to it -Tried to explain over the phone to an office manager that he is getting a DS1 and not a DSL line, that it has been installed, but no he cannot just plug it into the router. Someone needs to come out and do that. No I don't have time to do that today sorry -Rebuilt a Crashed NT3.51 server, tracked down who uses it and why? -The 3.51 server's data gets rolled into the new .net server I am playing with. Will do that remotely from home tomorrow -sent out my normal morning 100 emails -and of course flirted with some of the cute single gals here. And I was still faster then you : . Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a job It requires me to work You do not work -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I am good And much younger, there for Quicker at responding... : Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? You beat me to it! :P -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? NEVER done one... Am Much to intelligent to do such drivel. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious DOT, when was the last time you did a offline defrag and how long did it take? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Total IS size: 124GB Largest mailbox 1GB Users 1200 mailboxes 1300 No issues yet. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? IS = 14g Users = approx 300 Largest mailbox = 545,793k (and, no, it's not mine)[1] Oh, and Jason? Are you a size queen? :-) [1] mine is 251,827k, after major archiving this week -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kick boxing. - -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious about the size of people's information store on exchange 5.5 and the largest mailbox Also: Does anybody know if issues when the IS get's really large or if a single mailbox get's really large? Total IS size: 18GB Largest mailbox 2GB No issues yet. Thanks - Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Windows .NET Administration Tools
If you don't have a .NET server, then there's not much need for the .NET admin tools is there? If you have an MSDN subscription, you may be able to get it. Otherwise the standard channels of your Microsoft representative would be the next path. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows .NET Administration Tools I have not installed the software. I'm looking for the software. And I have pretty much figured out that they are not available separately. But I can't even find a spot on the MS site to order the windows.NET beta2. d -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows .NET Administration Tools Then how did you install the software? Wherever that was, is where the tools are. It is not available separately. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows .NET Administration Tools I don't have the beta2 cd... and I can't seem to find it on the Microsoft site When I do a search, I just find the visual studio .net beta 2. That is why I was hoping for the adminpak.msi itself. Dustin -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows .NET Administration Tools Probably on the CD. Adminpak.msi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dustin Krysak Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT:Windows .NET Administration Tools Sorry for the OT, but does anyone know where I can download the Windows .NET Administration Tools? Maybe best to reply off list. Thanks! Dustin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
In your case, you would want to do VPN. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up I am not very familiar with RAS. Do you know whether RAS will work in a configuration where I do not have a modem directly attached to the server since I have a T1 connection? My users will use a modem to dial-up to ATT global Network and be put on the T1. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto Accept Script
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 Outlook 2000 SP1 Hi all, I am running the Auto Accept Script from exchangecode.com. I have a secretary that did something that is forcing me to directly access the Calendar for the resource running the script but whenever I try to access it Outlook2000 just hangs. I tried running the /cleanfreebusy several times on Friday but it acts the same. Opens and hangs forever. Does anyone know how I can fix this so I can get to the Calendar? The script is still running fine. John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
Use OSTs to access the mail offline, after synching online. OWA will be faster, you realise... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want rain without thunder and lightning. - Frederick Douglass -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jean-Claude Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up Hello! I am new to this subject, please bear with me. Our users would like to access their emails from outside using our dial-up connection with ATT. Once they dial to ATT they will be put on our network via our T1 connection with ATT. We do not want to use OWA. Is there any one using a similar configuration to ours (Dial-up + T1) to access emails? Could you please tell us how you have made your exchange servers available to your mobile users.? I have two email servers. One stores our users mailboxes, the other one is a connector servers with 2 connectors: Internet Service connector (For inbound mail only from 2 unix server used internally ) and an X.400 connector that forward/retrieve all outbound/inbound mails to a head server in France, which in turn will forward the emails to the Internet. We have a T1 connection with ATT and would like to use ATT DIALUP to _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: alternate recipient + delivery to email domain
I think you answered your own question: we do not use DNS nor Hosts entry for @x2.abc.com as we just indicate the IP of that host in the forward all messages to this domain..that Hosts receives messages just from us so they do not have any presence on the internet...other than its IP address If the host is not registered in dns then the mail will bounceback immediately. If there is a record in dns for the host yet the host is down, exchange will retry transmit of message (host is down or unreachable). If the domain is registered yet authorative nameservers are not available, exchange will retry until nameservers become available or until the retry period is over (network error during host resolution). -Original Message- From: Romero, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: alternate recipient + delivery to email domain Hi all MSX5.5+SP4. we have some mailboxes that use delivery to alternate recipient the alternate recipient is @x2.abc.com also we have insructed the IMC through connections\specify by email the x2.abc.com and forward all messages to this domain to the IP of that host. all works fine when that Host is on. problem is that when they turn the server off, we start getting error 3010/3011/4031 and messages bounce back to the sender. I have checked the Service messages queues in the IMC Retry interval (hrs)=.25,.5,1,4 Timeout (hrs)=Urgent=24,normal=48,non-urgent=72 as for what I checked messages stay iun the outbound queue just one hour. the parametrs show above should guarantee me to stay at least 24Hrs If the hosts is off let say 8 hours the sender get (immediately) the following NDR Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: er Sent:Sun, 28 Oct 2001 07:52:58 -0800 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 28 Oct 2001 07:53:36 -0800 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=company;l=N20110281553VYZH90R4 MSEXCH:IMS:Company:site:N 3550 (000B09AA) 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] what could be happening? is like Exchange after retrying thinks that the domain @x2.abc.com does not exist and send the NDR to the sender..please consider that the deliver of messages is ok when that Hosts is ON. Note: we do not use DNS nor Hosts entry for @x2.abc.com as we just indicate the IP of that host in the forward all messages to this domain..tha Hosts receives messages just from us so they do not have any prescense on the internet...other than its IP address Tia -ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?
If there's no indication of problems with the disk, try checking the transaction logs to see if a large number of logs were generated in a short period of time corresponding to the hang. I've seen instances where 5.5 SP4 servers become unresponsive to clients as a result of someone attempting to send a *huge* attachment (500Mb+) and it bogged down the server. If this does prove to be the case then consider implementing internal message size limits. Dan Ferneyhough -Original Message- From: Andrew Duey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Dollars to donuts your HD went belly-up[1]. At least that would be the first thing to check on a perfectly running Exchange server that nobody's been monkeying with. Check your event/RAID logs (whichever is appropriate). --Andrew Duey, MCSE [1] always wanted to use that phrase[2] [2] and go nutz with footnotes. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might help? This server has never locked up like this in the last 2 years, and nothing has changed recently. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: alternate recipient + delivery to email domain
well that is not what is happening here...currently the queues of messages is building up...and the settings are the same...but the ip is not availableremember that we are instruicting Exchange directly to send @x2.abc.com to specific IP...why do we need DNS in that scenario? --er -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: alternate recipient + delivery to email domain I think you answered your own question: we do not use DNS nor Hosts entry for @x2.abc.com as we just indicate the IP of that host in the forward all messages to this domain..that Hosts receives messages just from us so they do not have any presence on the internet...other than its IP address If the host is not registered in dns then the mail will bounceback immediately. If there is a record in dns for the host yet the host is down, exchange will retry transmit of message (host is down or unreachable). If the domain is registered yet authorative nameservers are not available, exchange will retry until nameservers become available or until the retry period is over (network error during host resolution). -Original Message- From: Romero, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: alternate recipient + delivery to email domain Hi all MSX5.5+SP4. we have some mailboxes that use delivery to alternate recipient the alternate recipient is @x2.abc.com also we have insructed the IMC through connections\specify by email the x2.abc.com and forward all messages to this domain to the IP of that host. all works fine when that Host is on. problem is that when they turn the server off, we start getting error 3010/3011/4031 and messages bounce back to the sender. I have checked the Service messages queues in the IMC Retry interval (hrs)=.25,.5,1,4 Timeout (hrs)=Urgent=24,normal=48,non-urgent=72 as for what I checked messages stay iun the outbound queue just one hour. the parametrs show above should guarantee me to stay at least 24Hrs If the hosts is off let say 8 hours the sender get (immediately) the following NDR Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: er Sent:Sun, 28 Oct 2001 07:52:58 -0800 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 28 Oct 2001 07:53:36 -0800 The recipient name is not recognized The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=company;l=N20110281553VYZH90R4 MSEXCH:IMS:Company:site:N 3550 (000B09AA) 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED] what could be happening? is like Exchange after retrying thinks that the domain @x2.abc.com does not exist and send the NDR to the sender..please consider that the deliver of messages is ok when that Hosts is ON. Note: we do not use DNS nor Hosts entry for @x2.abc.com as we just indicate the IP of that host in the forward all messages to this domain..tha Hosts receives messages just from us so they do not have any prescense on the internet...other than its IP address Tia -ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Auto Accept Script
Sounds like you might have corrupted meeting notice. See technet for post sp4 fixes for CDO. CDO is what the auto-accept script uses. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto Accept Script Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 Outlook 2000 SP1 Hi all, I am running the Auto Accept Script from exchangecode.com. I have a secretary that did something that is forcing me to directly access the Calendar for the resource running the script but whenever I try to access it Outlook2000 just hangs. I tried running the /cleanfreebusy several times on Friday but it acts the same. Opens and hangs forever. Does anyone know how I can fix this so I can get to the Calendar? The script is still running fine. John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 logoff ?
OWA without SSL = BAD... You can register the SSL cert under a generic name instead of the actual server name, that way, it doesn't matter wether you are going to change the server name later or not. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:05 AM Posted To: NewsgroupDiscussion Conversation: OWA 2000 logoff ? Subject: OWA 2000 logoff ? In OWA2000 there are three ways you get logged off. One is to close the browser which closes the session and clears any cached authenticated pages so no one else can use your session. Two is to wait for 4 minutes (Default timeout setting for OWA2000). Or spend a bunch off money for Messageware's solution which gives you a logoff button. Question is that a customer would like to have it so if he is browsing the web and then backspaces to the OWA2000 session (within the 4 minute timeout setting) he is forced to login again. I said I do not think there is a way around the logoff procedures other than the above ones. I was curious if SSL was installed if it changes/overrides the timeout settings. I do not really want to setup up SSL at this time as we may change the name of the server prior to cut over. Anybody have any experience with SSL and OWA2000 and logoff issues different than normal sessions? _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Weird message from System Administrator
Just for my own edification, what was it? -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know, despite your bigshot attitude! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Thank you Andy! His email is about as clear as the Potomac River! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator Does this person have an alternate recipient defined for his/her mailbox? P.S. Your initial explanation of your problem was not very clear at all. You stated : It's being delivered to the .pst file because I don't have room on the server for more than 600 MB of email! Yes I know all about .pst files being not the ideal place to store email, but I can't bring down the server right now, just to add hard drive! That to me sounds like your mail server has only 600 MG of available space, not: I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email.(Which you stated later) Andy -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I don't have time for this kinda BS. Except for some useless trash talk, you still couldn't figure it out either! Here is a tip for you: Mr. BIGSHOT KNOW IT ALL, learn some manners! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator I understand that there is a care bear exchange list you can subscribe to. Maybe you should try there... Item #1: Email doesn't necessarily say what you mean Item #2: Sure she can talk for herself. However, we've been around here for quite a few years so we tend to say what we want. Item #3: I saw that, she's a very nice person and I would expect that of her. Item #4: I have been in that position before with the exact opposite results you came up with. I wonder why... Item #5: Your point is what?!? My mailbox is 700MB, I've seen others over a GB. Big Deal, I've got plenty of disk space and I would never nor will I ever advocate the use of PST's with an Exchange server. Item #6: Apparently not. Not likely. Waaahh... Item #7: Here's $.35, call someone who cares and ask for a refund. -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 12:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator 1- I was trying to clarify my situation better for her. Contrary to what you thought, I wasn't trying to be condescending to her. 2- Even if I did, can't talk for herself?! Who are you, her lawyer??! Still it doesn't give you the right to insult people like that. And you call yourself a computer professional??! 3- She responded to my email without any of the trash talk you did! 4- I am fully aware of our email system is not properly configured, but it's not because I don't know what is the best way to do it, it's because: A) No matter how many times I've told them, management doesn't want to listen to me. B) It doesn't want to spend money. C) It's not a high priority D) The only time they would approve is when a disaster happens. This is typical of this company. You gotta work in my company to know what I'm talking about. 5- I didn't say I have 600MB left on our mail server. The user's .pst file is 600MB. We have whole bunch of salespeople and others, who have each at least that much email. 6- I wasn't looking for advice how to set up our email system. I know my stuff well enough. I was just looking for an explanation for this. Instead what I got in return was insult from you and advice on how to set up my mail server and sarcastic remarks from others, except one person, who was actually trying to help me out. 7- So much for my wishful thinking that I can get help here! -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator He/she who properly configures his/her doesn't have problems. Apparently, you don't follow this model. You're the one who started the Again: User is currently out... like Lori is stupid and can't read. I merely upgraded to the level deemed necessary for you. Call me what you want, think
RE: Auto Accept Script
I am currently going through the same thing. I got the updated CDO.DLL but it did not fix the problem. I will let you know what finally fixes it. Ken Powell Systems Administrator Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) Vancouver, Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 Fax: (360) 759-6001 -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange 5.5 List Subject: FW: Auto Accept Script Sounds like you might have corrupted meeting notice. See technet for post sp4 fixes for CDO. CDO is what the auto-accept script uses. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Auto Accept Script Exchange 5.5 SP4 Windows 2000 SP2 Outlook 2000 SP1 Hi all, I am running the Auto Accept Script from exchangecode.com. I have a secretary that did something that is forcing me to directly access the Calendar for the resource running the script but whenever I try to access it Outlook2000 just hangs. I tried running the /cleanfreebusy several times on Friday but it acts the same. Opens and hangs forever. Does anyone know how I can fix this so I can get to the Calendar? The script is still running fine. John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000
Or http. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 displaying shocking lack of knowledge of Exchange 2000/ How would non-MAPI public stores be accessed? Direct file access? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! I think that's how Chicago got started. A bunch of people in New York said, Gee, I'm enjoying the crime and the poverty, but it just isn't cold enough. Let's go west. - Richard Jeni -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 One MAPI public store. You can have more non-MAPI public stores as long as they're within the one storage group. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 one public store. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! If you think you are experiencing a memory leak, please be aware that memory leaks may not be what they appear to be. You may discover that a memory leak is really not a memory leak but a performance enhancement - MS KB article 268343 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WebMeister Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 no public store? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 You're limited to a single priv.edb and a single storage group. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: WebMeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 The limit on Std version is 16GB per database. on Std version are you limited on the number of storage groups on a server? on Std version is your limit still 6 databases per storage group or is it less? Any explicit references ont this you can recomend? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Only Admins can access OWA??
Have you checked the FAQ? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Rich Gomes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Only Admins can access OWA?? I have OWA(Ex5.5\SP4) running on a IIS 4 machine inside a DMZ using NAT. The only people who can access it are Domain and Exchange admins. Everyone else gets prompted for their NT credentials and then gets a blank screen. Nothing in the IIS permissions explicitly mentions Exhange or domain admins groups. I have found nothing that describes this particular issue in the KB. Has anyone seen this?? Thank You, Rich Gomes GTECH Messaging Group _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?
We had a similar problem where the system just locked. Console froze and only resort was to power cycle the system. If the system totally locked up it may indicate a hardware problem. At least in our case it was. Check to see if you might have some bad memory in the system. We had a couple of dimms that were bad. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might help? This server has never locked up like this in the last 2 years, and nothing has changed recently. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000
oh-HO! I see. Must get copy of Exchange 2000 to play with at home... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 Or http. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 displaying shocking lack of knowledge of Exchange 2000/ How would non-MAPI public stores be accessed? Direct file access? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! I think that's how Chicago got started. A bunch of people in New York said, Gee, I'm enjoying the crime and the poverty, but it just isn't cold enough. Let's go west. - Richard Jeni -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 One MAPI public store. You can have more non-MAPI public stores as long as they're within the one storage group. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Way to go USPS Cycling Team and Lance Armstrong!! -- === -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 one public store. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! If you think you are experiencing a memory leak, please be aware that memory leaks may not be what they appear to be. You may discover that a memory leak is really not a memory leak but a performance enhancement - MS KB article 268343 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WebMeister Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 no public store? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 You're limited to a single priv.edb and a single storage group. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: WebMeister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise exchange 2000 The limit on Std version is 16GB per database. on Std version are you limited on the number of storage groups on a server? on Std version is your limit still 6 databases per storage group or is it less? Any explicit references ont this you can recomend? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
Mailbox limit
I'm about to set up a limit for my users for their mailboxes. I want to edit the system administrator message that gets sent out. Is this possible? If so, how do I edit it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First Time Setup
I moved from a IMAP/SMTP mail server to using Exchange 2K and I have some general questions about the setup and configuration. I have a small home network with 5 servers and a few clients. 1. I want to connect to the Exchange server through my NAT router. I read that I need to setup static ports for Exchange to use since it randomly selects ports once the client connects through port 135. Has anyone done this? Are there any issues with this? 2. I did not have ADS setup so I built a new box to start the AD and to install Exchange on it since it required AD. Can I keep the Exchange server on the Domain Controller of the AD or will this cause issues such as too much overhead? If there is an issue, can I set up another box as the exchange server and them copy everything over to the new box? How would I do that? 3. Is there tips and tricks for a home network? I can only forsee 5 to 10 users total. Its mostly setup to do development for Outlook forms and what not for clients and to provide email for the family. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing email messages
This may not be strictly an Exchange Server question, but I am interested in how a message can fail to be delivered and no error message is received by the sender. We run ES 5.5 SP4 on NT4.0 SP6. There have been no recent configuration changes apart from the installation of SP4. The system has been up and running satisfactorily for 2 years or more now. I had been advised that email had been sent to us and had not arrived, and no non-delivery report has been received by the sender. On Saturday last, the problem occurred to me while I was sending messages to the site from another internet mail account hosted at another ISP. Three emails were sent within a few minutes of each other, the first and third arriving correctly and speedily. The second did not arrive, and no non-delivery report has yet been received (now 2 days later). The first and third messages were to individual recipients at the site, the second message was to multiple recipients at the same site. Any thoughts would be most welcome. David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question regarding attachment utilities
Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment - search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their size Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question regarding attachment utilities
Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment - search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their size Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailbox attachment utility
Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment - search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their size Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help?
I suggest, as have others, that you look at a possible hard disk failure. The only time I have experienced this situation is following a scsi disk failure. On first reset the disk showed up as failed, a power cycle luckily got it started. It has now been replaced. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alverson, Thomas M. Sent: 29 October 2001 16:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EX5.5 Server just froze up - would post SP4 patches help? Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might help? This server has never locked up like this in the last 2 years, and nothing has changed recently. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nimda d??
Symantec Security Response - W32.Nimda.D@mmSymantec Security Response http://securityresponse.symantec.com W32.Nimda.D@mm Discovered on: October 29, 2001 Last Updated on: October 29, 2001 at 07:00:35 AM PST W32.Nimda.D@mm is an new version of W32.Nimda.A@mm that contains bug-fixes and modifications to avoid previous anti-virus detection. This worm is similar in functionality to W32.Nimda.A@mm. Differences include the modification of filenames used by the worm. The attachment received has been changed to sample.exe The dropped DLL file is now httpodbc.dll The worm now copies itself to the Windows System directory as csrss.exe instead of mmc.exe Infected HTML files are already detected as W32.Nimda.A@mm (html) Type: Virus, Worm Virus Definitions: October 29, 2001 Threat Assessment: Wild: Low Damage: Medium Distribution: High Wild: Number of infections: 0 - 49 Number of sites: 0 - 2 Geographical distribution: Low Threat containment: Easy Removal: Moderate Damage: Payload: Large scale e-mailing: Emails itself out as sample.exe Degrades performance: May cause system slowdown Compromises security settings: Creates open network shares Distribution: Name of attachment: sample.exe (this file may not be visible) Shared drives: Infects open network shares Target of infection: Specifically attempts to infect unpatched IIS servers Write-up by: Eric Chien _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anti-virus scanner
Have a look at: http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/pressrel/uk/20011017mm.html Let me know if you need any more info about Sophos from a user's viewpoint, although I have not used the above. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Olivier de Heer Sent: 29 October 2001 16:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anti-virus scanner Dear Anyone, We have a dedicated Connector server (Exchange 5.5 SP2) set up which connects an Exchange 5.5 environment to a Lotus Notes environment. This server only houses a X400 Connector and a Connector for Lotus Notes (so no Mailboxes). I know there isnt an anti-virus package that can scan X400 connectors on Exchange 5.5 yet. Is there an anti-virus scanning product for the Connector for Lotus Notes on Exchange 5.5? (I have my doubts) Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nimda d??
Symantec Security Response - W32.Nimda.D@mmSymantec Security Response http://securityresponse.symantec.com W32.Nimda.D@mm Discovered on: October 29, 2001 Last Updated on: October 29, 2001 at 07:00:35 AM PST W32.Nimda.D@mm is an new version of W32.Nimda.A@mm that contains bug-fixes and modifications to avoid previous anti-virus detection. This worm is similar in functionality to W32.Nimda.A@mm. Differences include the modification of filenames used by the worm. The attachment received has been changed to sample.exe The dropped DLL file is now httpodbc.dll The worm now copies itself to the Windows System directory as csrss.exe instead of mmc.exe Infected HTML files are already detected as W32.Nimda.A@mm (html) Type: Virus, Worm Virus Definitions: October 29, 2001 Threat Assessment: Wild: Low Damage: Medium Distribution: High Wild: Number of infections: 0 - 49 Number of sites: 0 - 2 Geographical distribution: Low Threat containment: Easy Removal: Moderate Damage: Payload: Large scale e-mailing: Emails itself out as sample.exe Degrades performance: May cause system slowdown Compromises security settings: Creates open network shares Distribution: Name of attachment: sample.exe (this file may not be visible) Shared drives: Infects open network shares Target of infection: Specifically attempts to infect unpatched IIS servers Write-up by: Eric Chien _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
utility to identify attachments
Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment - search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their size Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox limit
Youlose. Assuming this to be Exchange5.5, this is hardcoded and not editable. Section 3.35: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox limit I'm about to set up a limit for my users for their mailboxes. I want to edit the system administrator message that gets sent out. Is this possible? If so, how do I edit it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox limit
No. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox limit I'm about to set up a limit for my users for their mailboxes. I want to edit the system administrator message that gets sent out. Is this possible? If so, how do I edit it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox limit
Click ye to FAQ 3.35 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox limit I'm about to set up a limit for my users for their mailboxes. I want to edit the system administrator message that gets sent out. Is this possible? If so, how do I edit it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mailbox attachment utility
- Use ExMerge - Write custom code S. -Original Message- From: Treacy, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: mailbox attachment utility Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment - search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their size Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: First Time Setup
Mike, 1. The static ports are only if you want to connect to it from the Internet. Since you also have your Exchange server configured as DC for your AD, it won't be wise to open up access to it from the Internet. Why not deploy a VPN solution for Internet access? 2. With 10 users the overhead shouldn't be a big issue. The reason why you'd want to move it is to avoid putting all the eggs in one basket. Serdar.. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: First Time Setup I moved from a IMAP/SMTP mail server to using Exchange 2K and I have some general questions about the setup and configuration. I have a small home network with 5 servers and a few clients. 1. I want to connect to the Exchange server through my NAT router. I read that I need to setup static ports for Exchange to use since it randomly selects ports once the client connects through port 135. Has anyone done this? Are there any issues with this? 2. I did not have ADS setup so I built a new box to start the AD and to install Exchange on it since it required AD. Can I keep the Exchange server on the Domain Controller of the AD or will this cause issues such as too much overhead? If there is an issue, can I set up another box as the exchange server and them copy everything over to the new box? How would I do that? 3. Is there tips and tricks for a home network? I can only forsee 5 to 10 users total. Its mostly setup to do development for Outlook forms and what not for clients and to provide email for the family. Thanks, Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: utility to identify attachments
Im interested in a utility that prevents multiple posts on the same subject within a 5 minute time span. -Original Message- From: Treacy, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: utility to identify attachments Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment - search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their size Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Ray _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
