RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores
We have specified multiple stores in storage groups for our 2000 deployment, but as yet, we haven't decided who will go where. If you put all the payroll users on one store, you may get quite a good single instance ratio, and can set policies for those users, etc, which is good. However, if you have a problem with that store, you have the whole of payroll to contend with. We are also looking at 'users created/migrated this week go on store 1, next week on store 2, the week after on store 3, then back to store 1, etc' Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores Mounting the first mailbox store in a storage group takes more resources that mounting additional stores in a single storage group. So, from a pure resources point of view, there may be some advantages to multiple stores in fewer storage groups. All other things being equal, I think I generally prefer it that way as well, although I personally don't have enough practical experience with disaster recovery under a multitude of scenarios with E2K (thank $deity), so there are some parts of the 'optimal' E2K design which are still a bit theoretical in my mind. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores Basically we want to move away from the large single IS database and have several smaller ones which are more managable (in event of disaster recovery, backup/restore, offline maintanence, applying different mailbox limits, etc). Also, assuming there is only a problem with one IS, we don't this problem affecting all other users. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores It's best to not let external hierarchies dictate how technological solutions are developed. What is the point of this exercise? What do you hope to gain? Is there a desired end result towards which you are working? What are the perceived business benefits? Answer those first. - Original Message - From: Duane Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:26 PM Subject: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores I want to split up my staff mailboxes into relevant units eg, payroll, managers, etc, on my E2k Enterprise server. Is it best to create mutiple Mailbox Stores under one Storage Group, OR, just have several Storage Groups with the single Mailbox Store. Is there any advantage going one way or the other? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails
Peter Thanks for your reply. re. branding emails - this is a 3rd party add on to the internet mail connector that converts the email into html and adds your logo to the top of it and also adds a sidebar giving address/contact details. It ends up looking like a framed web page. It is viruses travelling in html formatting I'm particularly interested in so I'll check the kak worm out in more detail. I think it's only a matter of time before a major virus outbreak occurs caused by mass mailing of an html newsletter fetching something from the web when it's viewed. It's everyone's worst fear having a virus where the user only has to open a message to activate it rather than having to open an attachment. Let me know what you think. Thanks Andy There have been several viruses that have tried to update themselves from internet addresses, both websites and newsgroups. There have also been a few that have travelled in the HTML formatting of e-mails, notably the kak worm. I don't think there have been any that did both, however. What do you mean by branding emails with html conversions? -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails Hi all I am trying to find if there is any evidence of virus' travelling via html format emails between systems - ie. the sort of virus that goes and fetches something off of the internet when you view the html email. There is movement in my company to start branding emails with html conversions but I think that with the increasing quantity of virus' around html email will be unpopular within a year or so and everyone will go back to rich text or plain text. Of course I could be wrong anyone seen any articles about this type of risk? I'm not talking about the direct replication of the virus in this format - more the initial infection coming in this way rather than as an attachment which is getting rather predictable now... Many thanks Andy Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.
Ive added an E2K server to my 5.5 SP4 site, all seemed ok, no install errors, E2K has SP1 Q303451. I can send an email from a mailbox created on the E2K server to a mailbox on the 5.5 servers and also to the internet via the IMC on one of the 5.5 servers. If I send an email to the E2K mailbox I get an NDR, recipient not known, from any source. Also, when the email is delivered to the 5.5 servers, the display name is shown in the FROM field is as per display name in the AD. When it passes through the 5.5 IMC, it looks like a raw name. There are no error messages in any event log. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.
ADC in place? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site. Sensitivity: Confidential Ive added an E2K server to my 5.5 SP4 site, all seemed ok, no install errors, E2K has SP1 Q303451. I can send an email from a mailbox created on the E2K server to a mailbox on the 5.5 servers and also to the internet via the IMC on one of the 5.5 servers. If I send an email to the E2K mailbox I get an NDR, recipient not known, from any source. Also, when the email is delivered to the 5.5 servers, the display name is shown in the FROM field is as per display name in the AD. When it passes through the 5.5 IMC, it looks like a raw name. There are no error messages in any event log. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.
Yes, I ran this first. It shows up in the ADC MMC and a connection agreement cert for the said server. The AD master (PDC) is the same machine. -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 November 2001 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site. Sensitivity: Confidential ADC in place? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site. Sensitivity: Confidential Ive added an E2K server to my 5.5 SP4 site, all seemed ok, no install errors, E2K has SP1 Q303451. I can send an email from a mailbox created on the E2K server to a mailbox on the 5.5 servers and also to the internet via the IMC on one of the 5.5 servers. If I send an email to the E2K mailbox I get an NDR, recipient not known, from any source. Also, when the email is delivered to the 5.5 servers, the display name is shown in the FROM field is as per display name in the AD. When it passes through the 5.5 IMC, it looks like a raw name. There are no error messages in any event log. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pst2gb.exe
Microsoft PSS will send it to you. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Uthaya Sankar A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: pst2gb.exe Hi all did any body having pst2gb.exe ? if yes please send to me ?...i will be very greatful to you...i need this very urgently Regards A.Uthaya Sankar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving folders through replication, agent scripts
Just a thing I found out while experimenting with PF replication, moving, where some PF have agents installed. I thought somebody else could find this interesting. Some help arouse by Michael Veitch (thanks). Two server, same site, PF server for old and new is the old server (new didn't have a PF store until recently). PF with agent on old server. Add replica on new server, wait for syncronization, change home server, wait, remove instance on old server. Bummer, agent won't run anymore. Give permission on the destination server for the Events Root\Eventconfig_server and wait some time, until dest. server is available for selection in outlook - agents - run scripts in this server. Change it, test: Event has fired for newly arrived object, but not for a couple of email arrived while the event service was still configured on the old server. This is rather important - appareantly it means it is necessary to move the event script to the new server *before* removing the old instance. It also means when moving recursively (with propagate change to subfolders) lots of folders it is necessary to change manualy from outlook the server scripts are running on, or to write code which does it, before removing the old instance. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:26 AM To: 'Herold Heiko' Subject: RE: Public Folders Maybe a stupid question, have you installed the event service on the new PF server ? If you have you given yourself the necessary rights to create an event, client permissions must be at least author level? Mike -Original Message- From:Herold Heiko [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:28 November 2001 10:02 To: Veitch, Michael Subject: RE: Public Folders Yes, could be usefull, thanks. In fact in this moment I'm experimenting with the event service: after replicating, changing home server, remove original replica the event service on the dest. server won't monitor that folder. In fact in outlook there's a value run these agents on these servers where currently the old server only is selectable. Still pooring through documentation. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:00 AM To: 'Herold Heiko' Subject: Public Folders Just in case your trying to check if your PF's are fully replicated, there is a tool supplied on the Exchange CD that you can use to do this: The Public Folder Replication Verification tool (Replver.exe) compares public folders on Microsoft Exchange Server computers to determine if their contents have been successfully replicated. Might be worth a look. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change Display Name
Thanks, sir Ed. ps: the concerned user does not like changing/using the from address so as to used the second address I created (and therefore the new display name), so I asked this list for other ways. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Display Name There is only one display name. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peña, Botp Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Display Name Hello ALL, I need to change the display name of a certain user when his mail goes out to the internet (eg fr Peña, Botp to Botp, Netizen). His local display will still remain the same however. Is this possible? Tips, pls ;-) Thank you, -botp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST synchronizing problems
What does the synchronisation log say (you'll find this in the users deleted items or their dumpster if they clear out deleted items)? Also have you or any other Exchange admins for other Admin Groups made any changes to the Organizational Forms set up recently? You should check what permissions have been set on them. IIRC the default ought to be reviewer. Mark H -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST synchronizing problems Exchange 2000 server with SP1 Windows 2000 server with SP2 Problem is with Clients using Outlook 2002 accross Win 2000, NT4 and Win 98 with all the latest Service packs. Gurus of the Exchange world. I am having a problem with all our Outlook 2002 laptops. We set up our external laptops with Outlook 2002, using the OST. When they hit send and receive they get the error; Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The operation failed. An object could not be found.' If I disable the offline use the error does not come up but we need to use offline store for external users. I've searched my available resources and come up with the articles below. The articles do not suggest a fix is available, has anyone else experienced this and know of a fix? The second article suggests that this is a problem with the Offline address list being uninstalled from the Exchange Server? I think this will be a PSS call but if someone has already made that call I'd appreciate the info. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q289/9/69.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/3/64.ASP Thanks Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Two things. First, you don't state what (if any) antivirus software is running on the machine. There have been issues in the past of AV causing this kind of slowdown, but if its one of the better vendors you're probably fine. Second - my guess is that you're having network problems, specifically the NIC to Switch connection is set to autosense, which is BAD. Force both the switch and NIC to 100Mb Full Duplex and see if that fixes the issue. If not, try 100/Half (some NIC drivers can't handle 100/Full correctly). Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 This e-mail may be privileged or confidential. Any use of this e-mail by an unintended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please call me immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails
Bubbleboy is the only HTML email virus that I know of off the top of my head, but I think there was one more recently. In theory, its possible to have an HTML message be self-tracking, so to speak. Its possible to embed something that allows for a centralized log of who's reading the email, albeit a very limited amount of information, but it is possible. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails Hi all I am trying to find if there is any evidence of virus' travelling via html format emails between systems - ie. the sort of virus that goes and fetches something off of the internet when you view the html email. There is movement in my company to start branding emails with html conversions but I think that with the increasing quantity of virus' around html email will be unpopular within a year or so and everyone will go back to rich text or plain text. Of course I could be wrong anyone seen any articles about this type of risk? I'm not talking about the direct replication of the virus in this format - more the initial infection coming in this way rather than as an attachment which is getting rather predictable now... Many thanks Andy Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building large number of mailboxes
Iron Chef Migration had the help of Iron Chef CDO for that one... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Iron Chef Migration strikes again! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Funny enough, I have that info right over here Prohibit send is MDB-Over-Quota-Limit The warning level is MDB-Storage-Quota Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building large number of mailboxes Good morning, Exchange 5.5 SP4. Outlook 98. We are interested in building a large number of Exhange mailboxes using a template that has predetermined values in the Office field, department field and space limits. We cannot find the prohibit send and receive value to place in the CSV file. Does anyone know what this might be? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Yep. I can state with quite a bit of certainty that you're wrong - many have run more users and data on less hardware without these performance issues. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown There have been absolutely no changes to any software, services or network configs. The only thing that I can think of is we have run into some kind of performance barrier based on the abilities of our hardware, size of our databases and server usage. Can anyone confirm these theories? Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Any changes to virus software that you can trace this to? Any new services introduced into your Exchange environment? -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 This e-mail may be privileged or confidential. Any use of this e-mail by an unintended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please call me immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
It IS the network. Force the NIC and switch port to 100m Full Duplex and save the new Compaq gear for a Quake server. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Interesting. Very few members of this list have Ex on DC's for the already over discussed reasons. We may be seeing the downside of having such. Like you say, you can live with it but it does bug a little. Your hardware looks fine (well comparing it to mine anyway!) - the box I already have built and in the rack is a Compaq DL380 with 4 x 18.2Gb 10K2 RAID5 and 2 x 18Gb 10K2 Mirrored, 512Mb memory and dual 1Gb PIII's. Teaming NIC's and a 5200 RAID controller finish it off. I need to set aside some of the christmas holiday to do the transfer. I've discounted any bottlenecks in the LAN as I have just replaced all old hubs and switches with Cisco 3500XL 10/100 switches on GB fibre backbones so it must be the combo of DC and Exchange that is choking it. If I get any ideas I'll let you know. If anyone else has, well I think we'll soon find out Regards PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 23:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes my box is a BDC - Compaq Proliant 1850R - and yes I inherited it as well so I did not have a choice in the matter. We are waiting for next years budget but it looks like we will have to live with this machine for at least another year. That is a very interesting thought - there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server. Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown ~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: DL Membership vbs script
http://cwashington.netreach.net/ has a few, but I've had issues getting them to work correctly on a consistant basis. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Membership vbs script I'm looking for a small VBScript that will return Distribution List Membership. I know I got it from somebody here many months ago, but lost it as my office was on the 103rd Floor of World Trade Center #1. Any help would be greatly appreciated. PS. Anybody want to know about real life Disaster Recovery??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change Display Name
You can specify a different display name in Outlook Express. -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Display Name Hello ALL, I need to change the display name of a certain user when his mail goes out to the internet (eg fr Peña, Botp to Botp, Netizen). His local display will still remain the same however. Is this possible? Tips, pls ;-) Thank you, -botp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change Display Name
One could also do this with a transport sink in E2k or probably IIS5's SMTP service. Of course, that's a lot of overhead for one user. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change Display Name You can specify a different display name in Outlook Express. -Original Message- From: Peña, Botp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Display Name Hello ALL, I need to change the display name of a certain user when his mail goes out to the internet (eg fr Peña, Botp to Botp, Netizen). His local display will still remain the same however. Is this possible? Tips, pls ;-) Thank you, -botp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Membership vbs script
I would like to hear the story as well when you get the chance. I'm sure just about everyone here in the city knew at least one person who worked at your company. I hope things are getting better for everyone there - if that is possible. Andy -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DL Membership vbs script It isn't a script, but it should help you. Posted an eon ago by Robert Garrish. There are allusions to the VB script in the archives, but I couldn't find it. Missy (and I'd love to hear the story and some lessons learned - so sorry that you had to live though that; my heart goes out to you) = 01. If it does not already exist, create the following directory. C:\Program Files\Exchange\add-ons 02. Copy the following file to the directory named above. exdlm32.dll 03. Start, Run, regedit. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SOFTWARE Microsoft Exchange Client Extensions 04. Edit (pull down menu). New String Value Export Distribution List (give the string value this name, then press Enter) 05. Double Click on Export Distribution List and type in the following string value. 4.0;C:\Program Files\Exchange\add-ons\exdlm32.dll;1;010100 This process will create the following two new headings under the Tools pull down menu. Export Mailbox Properties Export Distribution List = - Original Message - From: Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:48 PM Subject: DL Membership vbs script I'm looking for a small VBScript that will return Distribution List Membership. I know I got it from somebody here many months ago, but lost it as my office was on the 103rd Floor of World Trade Center #1. Any help would be greatly appreciated. PS. Anybody want to know about real life Disaster Recovery??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building large number of mailboxes
Does Tin Chef Hampshire know about this? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Iron Chef Migration had the help of Iron Chef CDO for that one... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Iron Chef Migration strikes again! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Funny enough, I have that info right over here Prohibit send is MDB-Over-Quota-Limit The warning level is MDB-Storage-Quota Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building large number of mailboxes Good morning, Exchange 5.5 SP4. Outlook 98. We are interested in building a large number of Exhange mailboxes using a template that has predetermined values in the Office field, department field and space limits. We cannot find the prohibit send and receive value to place in the CSV file. Does anyone know what this might be? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server DCPromo is for changing the role of a Win2k server. U-Promote is a 3rd party utility that can change the role of an NT server. -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes my box is a BDC - Compaq Proliant 1850R - and yes I inherited it as well so I did not have a choice in the matter. We are waiting for next years budget but it looks like we will have to live with this machine for at least another year. That is a very interesting thought - there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server. Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown ~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
Is it all clients? I have seen corrupted profiles that could cause this problem. Anti-virus product could be an issue. When is your online-defrag set for? That could cause some slowdown, if it is running during the day. -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 This e-mail may be privileged or confidential. Any use of this e-mail by an unintended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please call me immediately. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Membership vbs script
It's not a vbscript, but how about using ONDL.exe from the BORK? I had a former HS football teammate that worked for your company. He didn't get out. God Bless you and good luck! -- Matthew Monteleone-Haught Information Technology E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wheaton USA Inc A member of the ALCAN group of companies MCSE -Original Message- From: Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL Membership vbs script I'm looking for a small VBScript that will return Distribution List Membership. I know I got it from somebody here many months ago, but lost it as my office was on the 103rd Floor of World Trade Center #1. Any help would be greatly appreciated. PS. Anybody want to know about real life Disaster Recovery??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building large number of mailboxes
He doesn't need to know... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Does Tin Chef Hampshire know about this? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Iron Chef Migration had the help of Iron Chef CDO for that one... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Iron Chef Migration strikes again! Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Funny enough, I have that info right over here Prohibit send is MDB-Over-Quota-Limit The warning level is MDB-Storage-Quota Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building large number of mailboxes Good morning, Exchange 5.5 SP4. Outlook 98. We are interested in building a large number of Exhange mailboxes using a template that has predetermined values in the Office field, department field and space limits. We cannot find the prohibit send and receive value to place in the CSV file. Does anyone know what this might be? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox
THere are a few users here that get the error that they are exceeding their limit on the server, but they only have nine items in their mailbox. The mailbox limit used here is 32k. I looked on the server and it says that they have 34k, but their are only 9 items in thier mailbox which is 3k. any suggestions thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.
Does the Recipient ADC need to be in place before Installing Exchange or can it be added after? -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 November 2001 09:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site. Sensitivity: Confidential ADC in place? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site. Sensitivity: Confidential Ive added an E2K server to my 5.5 SP4 site, all seemed ok, no install errors, E2K has SP1 Q303451. I can send an email from a mailbox created on the E2K server to a mailbox on the 5.5 servers and also to the internet via the IMC on one of the 5.5 servers. If I send an email to the E2K mailbox I get an NDR, recipient not known, from any source. Also, when the email is delivered to the 5.5 servers, the display name is shown in the FROM field is as per display name in the AD. When it passes through the 5.5 IMC, it looks like a raw name. There are no error messages in any event log. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Membership vbs script
Thanks all for the ONDL pointer and the good wishes. But, there definately is a VBScript that, when launched, brings up what looks like the GAL. You then select the DL's and it then ouputs the Membership. I'll continue looking. As far as Disaster Recovery goes, make sure your Backups are running well and that you get the tapes off-site ASAP. If somebody thinks that you can cut costs but not having the tapes picked up as often as once a week, then have them get in touch with me. I can cite how you can lose much more by not sending them out. Marc Marc Whitken NT System Administration Messaging Anti-Virus Group eSpeed / Cantor Fitzgerald 120 West Passaic Street Rochelle Park, NJ 07662 (201) 556-1500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of Cantor Fitzgerald. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). For further important information, please see http://www.cantor.com/full-disclaimer.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
OL98 or higher? If yes, then right click on the Mailbox - Joe EndUser folder and go to properties, then click folder size. What does it say? My guess would be Sent Items, Deleted Items or Journal are where you will find the most items. 32K or 32000K? 32K seems a little small. -- Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox THere are a few users here that get the error that they are exceeding their limit on the server, but they only have nine items in their mailbox. The mailbox limit used here is 32k. I looked on the server and it says that they have 34k, but their are only 9 items in thier mailbox which is 3k. any suggestions thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
Are you sure you limits are set correctly,...they're in Kb not Mb... Simon Butler Merrill Lynch HSBC -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox OL98 or higher? If yes, then right click on the Mailbox - Joe EndUser folder and go to properties, then click folder size. What does it say? My guess would be Sent Items, Deleted Items or Journal are where you will find the most items. 32K or 32000K? 32K seems a little small. -- Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox THere are a few users here that get the error that they are exceeding their limit on the server, but they only have nine items in their mailbox. The mailbox limit used here is 32k. I looked on the server and it says that they have 34k, but their are only 9 items in thier mailbox which is 3k. any suggestions thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by any entity or office through which this message has been sent unless otherwise clearly indicated in this message and the authority of the author to so bind Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited or any other company within its group is duly verified. Any email may be monitored in accordance with Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited's communication policy. Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited Registered Office 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ. Registered in England Number 3973777 Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited regulated by the FSA ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
the folder size is 34599k _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
To whom did you reply? If the folder size is 34599K then it can't be 3k as previously stated. Are you confusing mailbox with inbox? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox the folder size is 34599k _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
In addition to those locations, check the Outlook Today folder. It's a common problem for people to drop stuff there - you'll never see it again with the standard OL client. You'll need to use an IMAP or Exchange client to clean those out. Tom. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox OL98 or higher? If yes, then right click on the Mailbox - Joe EndUser folder and go to properties, then click folder size. What does it say? My guess would be Sent Items, Deleted Items or Journal are where you will find the most items. 32K or 32000K? 32K seems a little small. -- Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox THere are a few users here that get the error that they are exceeding their limit on the server, but they only have nine items in their mailbox. The mailbox limit used here is 32k. I looked on the server and it says that they have 34k, but their are only 9 items in thier mailbox which is 3k. any suggestions thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
The problem has been solved. The folders were hidden in Outlook Today and i have deleted them. Thanks to everyone that responded to help me out, i really appreciate it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
In addition to those locations, check the Outlook Today folder. It's a common problem for people to drop stuff there - you'll never see it again with the standard OL client. You'll need to use an IMAP or Exchange client to clean those out. O2K Advanced Find shows stuff in Outlook Today - it calls it Top Of Information Store. You can delete from the find results window _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
Thanks! I hadn't found that way yet. Tom. -Original Message- From: Phillips, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox In addition to those locations, check the Outlook Today folder. It's a common problem for people to drop stuff there - you'll never see it again with the standard OL client. You'll need to use an IMAP or Exchange client to clean those out. O2K Advanced Find shows stuff in Outlook Today - it calls it Top Of Information Store. You can delete from the find results window _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
I think OL98 does that, too. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Thanks! I hadn't found that way yet. Tom. -Original Message- From: Phillips, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox In addition to those locations, check the Outlook Today folder. It's a common problem for people to drop stuff there - you'll never see it again with the standard OL client. You'll need to use an IMAP or Exchange client to clean those out. O2K Advanced Find shows stuff in Outlook Today - it calls it Top Of Information Store. You can delete from the find results window _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Membership vbs script
Missy, I've searched for the exdlm32.dll but can not locate it. Do you know where can this be found? Lynne -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DL Membership vbs script It isn't a script, but it should help you. Posted an eon ago by Robert Garrish. There are allusions to the VB script in the archives, but I couldn't find it. Missy (and I'd love to hear the story and some lessons learned - so sorry that you had to live though that; my heart goes out to you) = 01. If it does not already exist, create the following directory. C:\Program Files\Exchange\add-ons 02. Copy the following file to the directory named above. exdlm32.dll 03. Start, Run, regedit. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SOFTWARE Microsoft Exchange Client Extensions 04. Edit (pull down menu). New String Value Export Distribution List (give the string value this name, then press Enter) 05. Double Click on Export Distribution List and type in the following string value. 4.0;C:\Program Files\Exchange\add-ons\exdlm32.dll;1;010100 This process will create the following two new headings under the Tools pull down menu. Export Mailbox Properties Export Distribution List = - Original Message - From: Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:48 PM Subject: DL Membership vbs script I'm looking for a small VBScript that will return Distribution List Membership. I know I got it from somebody here many months ago, but lost it as my office was on the 103rd Floor of World Trade Center #1. Any help would be greatly appreciated. PS. Anybody want to know about real life Disaster Recovery??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
And I just noted that Q289949 explains how to disable viewing the root folder as Outlook Today to allow for recovery of lost items I think OL98 does that, too. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox
Sent items? When did they delete things? And, 32kb? That's an awfully small limit ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/28/2001 08:08 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Mailbox | ---| THere are a few users here that get the error that they are exceeding their limit on the server, but they only have nine items in their mailbox. The mailbox limit used here is 32k. I looked on the server and it says that they have 34k, but their are only 9 items in thier mailbox which is 3k. any suggestions thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
oops - I knew it was something alone that lines -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server DCPromo is for changing the role of a Win2k server. U-Promote is a 3rd party utility that can change the role of an NT server. -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown Yes my box is a BDC - Compaq Proliant 1850R - and yes I inherited it as well so I did not have a choice in the matter. We are waiting for next years budget but it looks like we will have to live with this machine for at least another year. That is a very interesting thought - there is a 3rd party utility available called DC-Promo that can turn a domain controller into a standalone server. Thanks Shawn -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown ~ndi Ironically I get pretty much the same as you, bad slowdown at peak times. Now, my exchange box is a BDC which I know is against the rules but I inherited it from old and do not have the resource (read time) to migrate until the new year. Is yours a DC? - If so this may be the pattern. FYI, this box is a Dell 2400 single PIII 500, 3 x 9.1Gb RAID5 and 256Mb memory (5.5sp4) but only ~150 users in this particular site. PBB -Original Message- From: Leblanc, Shawn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 20:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown I am hoping someone out there is having some of the same issues as we are having and have come up with some solutions. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated. Our current setup is; - Single Server Exchange Server Enterprise 5.5 Sp4 running OWA - Compaq Server Dual PII 450 Xeon Processors - 5 hard drives - 3 10,000rpm 36.4 GB drives in RAID 5 (Databases) - 2 10,000rpm 9.1 GB drives in RAID 1 (Transaction Logs) - Server is running at 100mbps full duplex. - Pub.edb = 150mb - Priv.edb 18.5 GB (approx 40GB of free space) - Circular Logging Turned off - Differential Arcserve Backup enabled - 200 - 230 Users and 300 mailboxes Description For the past couple of weeks we have notice a perceptible slowdown in client side response times on our exchange server. The slowdown mainly happens at peak times,(9-10am and 2-3pm) however we have noticed it with attachments and at other times as well. It sometimes can take 5-8 seconds to open an e-mail with an attachment where we have been getting immediate response before. For scrolling through messages in Outlook we have also noticed a slow down. Also - when copying an attachment from an e-mail to your local machine,(right click and copy, then paste to desktop) this response time has decrease dramatically. Although these slowdowns do not stop us from working on a daily basis we would like to get on top of this issue and do what we need to do to keep our Exchange server speedy. Any ideas or recommendations are appreciated. Regards, _ Shawn M. Leblanc, Network Technician BULL, HOUSSER TUPPER Vancouver, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bht.com Tel: (604) 687-6575 or Direct # 641-4919 Fax: (604) 641-4949 or Direct # 646-2500 Pager: (604) 650-4155 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
Ol2002 does the following, not sure about other clients: Right click outlook today, select properties. Select the home page tab, and remove the tick from the box. Then the folder displays as a normal folder. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox I think OL98 does that, too. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Thanks! I hadn't found that way yet. Tom. -Original Message- From: Phillips, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox In addition to those locations, check the Outlook Today folder. It's a common problem for people to drop stuff there - you'll never see it again with the standard OL client. You'll need to use an IMAP or Exchange client to clean those out. O2K Advanced Find shows stuff in Outlook Today - it calls it Top Of Information Store. You can delete from the find results window _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
Geez, two neat tricks in one thread. : ) Thanks Rob, that's a good one too. Tom. -Original Message- From: Robert Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Ol2002 does the following, not sure about other clients: Right click outlook today, select properties. Select the home page tab, and remove the tick from the box. Then the folder displays as a normal folder. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox I think OL98 does that, too. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Thanks! I hadn't found that way yet. Tom. -Original Message- From: Phillips, Alan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox In addition to those locations, check the Outlook Today folder. It's a common problem for people to drop stuff there - you'll never see it again with the standard OL client. You'll need to use an IMAP or Exchange client to clean those out. O2K Advanced Find shows stuff in Outlook Today - it calls it Top Of Information Store. You can delete from the find results window _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server - Outlook Client Slowdown
I would recommend setting up a network sniffer to see the traffic load of the LAN heading to your server. From the configuration you have, I would suspect this to be a good possibility for your bottleneck. Bill Collins _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Database
Okay, my boss had an NT account, with an Exchange account. I just noticed that it was deleted, and yet he was still able to access his outlook, and get out to the internet through our proxy. Is there anyway to find out who and when it was deleted?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possible to use Exchange folders for database reporting?
Is it possible to use the folder in Exchange 5.5 to report on an ODBC database? I'd like the user to be able to click on the public folder and have it list all the info in an ODBC database. Am I crazy or is this possible? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sam Database
Event logs on the exchange box and the PDC. You do have auditing turned on right? -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sam Database Okay, my boss had an NT account, with an Exchange account. I just noticed that it was deleted, and yet he was still able to access his outlook, and get out to the internet through our proxy. Is there anyway to find out who and when it was deleted?!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Possible to use Exchange folders for database reporting?
$ = possible. $ = not simple Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arch Willingham Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Possible to use Exchange folders for database reporting? Is it possible to use the folder in Exchange 5.5 to report on an ODBC database? I'd like the user to be able to click on the public folder and have it list all the info in an ODBC database. Am I crazy or is this possible? Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W3SVC? Directories
Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? ** NOTICE This e-mail and attachment(s) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If received in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete/destroy the message and any copies thereof. Although Associated Banc-Corp and/or its affiliates (collectively Associated) attempt to prevent the passage of viruses via e-mail and attachments thereto, Associated does not guarantee that either are virus-free, and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of any such viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
They are log files for your web server Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bilbrey, Jason Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? ** NOTICE This e-mail and attachment(s) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If received in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete/destroy the message and any copies thereof. Although Associated Banc-Corp and/or its affiliates (collectively Associated) attempt to prevent the passage of viruses via e-mail and attachments thereto, Associated does not guarantee that either are virus-free, and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of any such viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W3SVC? Directories
Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Bilbrey, Jason | || jason.bilbrey@associated| || bank.com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/28/2001 11:29 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: W3SVC? Directories | ---| Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? ** NOTICE This e-mail and attachment(s) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If received in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete/destroy the message and any copies thereof. Although Associated Banc-Corp and/or its affiliates (collectively Associated) attempt to prevent the passage of viruses via e-mail and attachments thereto, Associated does not guarantee that either are virus-free, and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of any such viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
H Well, it strikes me that if he's heard of Exchange then he's likely to have heard about IIS. If not... YIKES! The most certain test by which we can judge whether a country is really free is the amount of security enjoyed by minorities. -Lord Acton -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
Perhaps. But again he didn't say anything about them being on the Exch server. So a lack of details let to the conclusion that he was talking about IIS rather than Exch. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
That's certainly a possibility, and no intent to offend Jason or to engage in a game of upmanship, but TechNet and deja.com are our friends. In the attempt to provide a fishing lesson, when I find something I don't recognize on a server, those are the first two resources I check. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving folders through replication, agent scripts
Yes, it's indeed true that event scripts are tied to a specific server. They don't travel with the public folder and don't replicate with new instances. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving folders through replication, agent scripts Just a thing I found out while experimenting with PF replication, moving, where some PF have agents installed. I thought somebody else could find this interesting. Some help arouse by Michael Veitch (thanks). Two server, same site, PF server for old and new is the old server (new didn't have a PF store until recently). PF with agent on old server. Add replica on new server, wait for syncronization, change home server, wait, remove instance on old server. Bummer, agent won't run anymore. Give permission on the destination server for the Events Root\Eventconfig_server and wait some time, until dest. server is available for selection in outlook - agents - run scripts in this server. Change it, test: Event has fired for newly arrived object, but not for a couple of email arrived while the event service was still configured on the old server. This is rather important - appareantly it means it is necessary to move the event script to the new server *before* removing the old instance. It also means when moving recursively (with propagate change to subfolders) lots of folders it is necessary to change manualy from outlook the server scripts are running on, or to write code which does it, before removing the old instance. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:26 AM To: 'Herold Heiko' Subject: RE: Public Folders Maybe a stupid question, have you installed the event service on the new PF server ? If you have you given yourself the necessary rights to create an event, client permissions must be at least author level? Mike -Original Message- From:Herold Heiko [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:28 November 2001 10:02 To: Veitch, Michael Subject: RE: Public Folders Yes, could be usefull, thanks. In fact in this moment I'm experimenting with the event service: after replicating, changing home server, remove original replica the event service on the dest. server won't monitor that folder. In fact in outlook there's a value run these agents on these servers where currently the old server only is selectable. Still pooring through documentation. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:00 AM To: 'Herold Heiko' Subject: Public Folders Just in case your trying to check if your PF's are fully replicated, there is a tool supplied on the Exchange CD that you can use to do this: The Public Folder Replication Verification tool (Replver.exe) compares public folders on Microsoft Exchange Server computers to determine if their contents have been successfully replicated. Might be worth a look. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
Probably not, so I guess it was a good thing that Kelly told him. You'd have preferred he be left in the dark? Or is it something else that's making you whiny today? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails
I don't think that converting all your outgoing messages to HTML will increase the chances of a virus outbreak. I'm guessing that 95% of the messages we send are HTML as it is, since all the rich text messages are converted to HTML on sending to the Internet. Furthermore, because of Kak, all the virus scanners now are capable of scanning message bodies for viruses encoded in the HTML. If you're looking for an argument against HTML message branding, I think a better one will be all the email clients still out there that probably won't be able to view them correctly. -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails Peter Thanks for your reply. re. branding emails - this is a 3rd party add on to the internet mail connector that converts the email into html and adds your logo to the top of it and also adds a sidebar giving address/contact details. It ends up looking like a framed web page. It is viruses travelling in html formatting I'm particularly interested in so I'll check the kak worm out in more detail. I think it's only a matter of time before a major virus outbreak occurs caused by mass mailing of an html newsletter fetching something from the web when it's viewed. It's everyone's worst fear having a virus where the user only has to open a message to activate it rather than having to open an attachment. Let me know what you think. Thanks Andy There have been several viruses that have tried to update themselves from internet addresses, both websites and newsgroups. There have also been a few that have travelled in the HTML formatting of e-mails, notably the kak worm. I don't think there have been any that did both, however. What do you mean by branding emails with html conversions? -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails Hi all I am trying to find if there is any evidence of virus' travelling via html format emails between systems - ie. the sort of virus that goes and fetches something off of the internet when you view the html email. There is movement in my company to start branding emails with html conversions but I think that with the increasing quantity of virus' around html email will be unpopular within a year or so and everyone will go back to rich text or plain text. Of course I could be wrong anyone seen any articles about this type of risk? I'm not talking about the direct replication of the virus in this format - more the initial infection coming in this way rather than as an attachment which is getting rather predictable now... Many thanks Andy Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
She doesn't like when other women can play nicely with the boys? That would be my guess on what makes her pissy every time I have seen her deal with another female on the list. Jealously, perhaps. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Ed Crowley | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/28/2001 12:30 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories | ---| Probably not, so I guess it was a good thing that Kelly told him. You'd have preferred he be left in the dark? Or is it something else that's making you whiny today? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: W3SVC? Directories
pissy??? et tu errkelly -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories She doesn't like when other women can play nicely with the boys? That would be my guess on what makes her pissy every time I have seen her deal with another female on the list. Jealously, perhaps. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Getting up to speed on Exchange2K
Thanks, well I have nothing else to do with the beefy server so I'll probably use it. As far as Tony Redmond's tome I'm assuming it's Microsoft Exchange Server for Windows 2000: Planning, Design and Implementation by Tony Redmond Is that correct? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Getting up to speed on Exchange2K It's my experience you don't need beefy servers just to learn the product. I run it here on crappy clones. My book recommendation is Tony Redmond's tome. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Getting up to speed on Exchange2K Well, I never did manage to get Exchange 2000 training before cutbacks hit hard at my company. I'll be shown the door at the end of January and while I have been working with exchange since 4.0 I don't have any experience or training with exchange 2000. Assuming that taking a real training class is out of the question I'm looking for suggestions on what books or other resources would be the best way get up to speed. I've got a fairly beefy server to install exchange 2000 on and a couple of eMonsters to act as Win2000 domain controllers if it makes a difference. Thanks in advance for any advice or recommendations. Life, like poker, has an element of risk. It shouldn't be avoided. It should be faced. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Getting up to speed on Exchange2K
Yes. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Getting up to speed on Exchange2K Thanks, well I have nothing else to do with the beefy server so I'll probably use it. As far as Tony Redmond's tome I'm assuming it's Microsoft Exchange Server for Windows 2000: Planning, Design and Implementation by Tony Redmond Is that correct? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Getting up to speed on Exchange2K It's my experience you don't need beefy servers just to learn the product. I run it here on crappy clones. My book recommendation is Tony Redmond's tome. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Getting up to speed on Exchange2K Well, I never did manage to get Exchange 2000 training before cutbacks hit hard at my company. I'll be shown the door at the end of January and while I have been working with exchange since 4.0 I don't have any experience or training with exchange 2000. Assuming that taking a real training class is out of the question I'm looking for suggestions on what books or other resources would be the best way get up to speed. I've got a fairly beefy server to install exchange 2000 on and a couple of eMonsters to act as Win2000 domain controllers if it makes a difference. Thanks in advance for any advice or recommendations. Life, like poker, has an element of risk. It shouldn't be avoided. It should be faced. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pst2gb.exe
Title: RE: pst2gb.exe Google says it´s here: http://carr.no/PST2GB.zip -Original Message- From: Uthaya Sankar A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: pst2gb.exe Hi all did any body having pst2gb.exe ? if yes please send to me ?...i will be very greatful to you...i need this very urgently Regards A.Uthaya Sankar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox
You might also go to the Deleted Items folder, delete everything in it, then go to Tools, recover Deleted Items. Click on that and you might be surprised how much deleted mail is still lurking on the server. Delete all the deleted again from that screen. Has helped here a number of times. Doug Deaton, MCSE IS Technical Support Sunterra Pacific 425-454-3065 xt 1212 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox THere are a few users here that get the error that they are exceeding their limit on the server, but they only have nine items in their mailbox. The mailbox limit used here is 32k. I looked on the server and it says that they have 34k, but their are only 9 items in thier mailbox which is 3k. any suggestions thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. This e-mail and any attachment(s) are believed to be free from virus. However it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from the receipt, opening or use of this e-mail and any attachment(s). Thank You. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IISlockdown tool and e2k issue
Hi, Did anybody applied the IISlockdown tool before installing their e2k server? Since I've been having lot of problem with my e2k regarding access violation, I installed the e2k without applying the IISlockdown tool. Now I don't get any errors. I am bit paranoid that SMTP is integrated with IIS 5.0 in e2k. My question is that do I have to have the IISlockdown applied to the e2k server? I tried applying it after the e2k installation. It failed. Second, if I am going to use SSL(TSL) for my OWA, do I need port 80 opened at the firewall? Please give me your suggestion on the OWA access(through VPN, through SSL). Thanks for your help. Sam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
NOrton Anti-Virus for Exchange -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST synchronizing problems
Mark, the log says the OAB did not synchronize which is the saem as the article on technet. No new Organizational forms have been created. I went to the OAB and I have the option to mail enable the OAB. This should be the same as install but should I have the option to mail enable or should it already be done? The default permissions for the OAB are set to editor which should have the rights. Again this should not have changed from install and I have not migrated from 5.5 so no forms to come over, this was a clean install that had been running OST without any problems until last week. I am sole admin for it so I can't imagine anyone has done anything, the only change was that we upgraded our backup exec to 2000. 07:50:12 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Robert Keyte' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Hierarchy 07:50:12 Synchronizing Favorites 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Large Messages' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'MS Stuff' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'nboyd' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Sys_admin' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'upgrade' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'v-mail' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Views 07:50:12 Done 07:50:13 Microsoft Exchange offline address book 07:50:130X8004010F -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Harford Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OST synchronizing problems What does the synchronisation log say (you'll find this in the users deleted items or their dumpster if they clear out deleted items)? Also have you or any other Exchange admins for other Admin Groups made any changes to the Organizational Forms set up recently? You should check what permissions have been set on them. IIRC the default ought to be reviewer. Mark H -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST synchronizing problems Exchange 2000 server with SP1 Windows 2000 server with SP2 Problem is with Clients using Outlook 2002 accross Win 2000, NT4 and Win 98 with all the latest Service packs. Gurus of the Exchange world. I am having a problem with all our Outlook 2002 laptops. We set up our external laptops with Outlook 2002, using the OST. When they hit send and receive they get the error; Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The operation failed. An object could not be found.' If I disable the offline use the error does not come up but we need to use offline store for external users. I've searched my available resources and come up with the articles below. The articles do not suggest a fix is available, has anyone else experienced this and know of a fix? The second article suggests that this is a problem with the Offline address list being uninstalled from the Exchange Server? I think this will be a PSS call but if someone has already made that call I'd appreciate the info. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q289/9/69.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/3/64.ASP Thanks Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
http://www.sybari.com How many users? ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Saravanan Narayanan | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/28/2001 10:12 AM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner | ---| Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL Membership vbs script
Title: RE: DL Membership vbs script Same here... http://www.uwsp.edu/it/exchange/client_ext/export/export.html -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: DL Membership vbs script It isn't a script, but it should help you. Posted an eon ago by Robert Garrish. There are allusions to the VB script in the archives, but I couldn't find it. Missy (and I'd love to hear the story and some lessons learned - so sorry that you had to live though that; my heart goes out to you) = 01. If it does not already exist, create the following directory. C:\Program Files\Exchange\add-ons 02. Copy the following file to the directory named above. exdlm32.dll 03. Start, Run, regedit. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SOFTWARE Microsoft Exchange Client Extensions 04. Edit (pull down menu). New String Value Export Distribution List (give the string value this name, then press Enter) 05. Double Click on Export Distribution List and type in the following string value. 4.0;C:\Program Files\Exchange\add-ons\exdlm32.dll;1;010100 This process will create the following two new headings under the Tools pull down menu. Export Mailbox Properties Export Distribution List = - Original Message - From: Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:48 PM Subject: DL Membership vbs script I'm looking for a small VBScript that will return Distribution List Membership. I know I got it from somebody here many months ago, but lost it as my office was on the 103rd Floor of World Trade Center #1. Any help would be greatly appreciated. PS. Anybody want to know about real life Disaster Recovery??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution." _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
Trend or Sybari. Those are your choices. Anything else is 2nd string. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saravanan Narayanan Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
I guess we need to guess at your definition of affordable. I like Trend. Your budget will dictate your choice. -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue
1. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q309/5/08.asp 2. If you're only using SSL you only need 443 open. -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:27 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue Subject: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue Hi, Did anybody applied the IISlockdown tool before installing their e2k server? Since I've been having lot of problem with my e2k regarding access violation, I installed the e2k without applying the IISlockdown tool. Now I don't get any errors. I am bit paranoid that SMTP is integrated with IIS 5.0 in e2k. My question is that do I have to have the IISlockdown applied to the e2k server? I tried applying it after the e2k installation. It failed. Second, if I am going to use SSL(TSL) for my OWA, do I need port 80 opened at the firewall? Please give me your suggestion on the OWA access(through VPN, through SSL). Thanks for your help. Sam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antigen and Email Content Filter
Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antigen and Email Content Filter
Take a look at Tumbleweed's MMS or Mimesweeper. Tom. -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antigen and Email Content Filter Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Antigen and Email Content Filter
We have a beta program: * ELIMINATE SUSPECT EMAIL MESSAGES Sybari Software released Antigen 6.5, antivirus, content- management, and email security software for Microsoft Exchange Server. The software lets you eliminate suspect email messages and spam based on subject line, sender, or domain name. You can delete filtered messages and attachments or quarantine them for review and later delivery. You can customize the defaults for scan jobs and establish custom job templates and file filter sets. ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Erik Vesneski| || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/28/2001 01:56 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Antigen and Email Content Filter | ---| Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
Affordable is relative. What is the cost to disinfect a server if you get hit with a virus? If you are using a corporate license now, it may become affordable to stick with the Exchange version of what you have Larry Josefowski Network Operations Analyst Conectiv, Inc. (302) 451-5548 -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue
Apply IISLockdown to an Exchange 2000 Server? You mean like what they tell you NOT to do? There is at least one technet article that tells you how to fix it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue Hi, Did anybody applied the IISlockdown tool before installing their e2k server? Since I've been having lot of problem with my e2k regarding access violation, I installed the e2k without applying the IISlockdown tool. Now I don't get any errors. I am bit paranoid that SMTP is integrated with IIS 5.0 in e2k. My question is that do I have to have the IISlockdown applied to the e2k server? I tried applying it after the e2k installation. It failed. Second, if I am going to use SSL(TSL) for my OWA, do I need port 80 opened at the firewall? Please give me your suggestion on the OWA access(through VPN, through SSL). Thanks for your help. Sam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
Exactly. You can pay for it now, or pay for it later. Paying later will be much more costly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Josefowski, Larry Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Affordable is relative. What is the cost to disinfect a server if you get hit with a virus? If you are using a corporate license now, it may become affordable to stick with the Exchange version of what you have Larry Josefowski Network Operations Analyst Conectiv, Inc. (302) 451-5548 -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OST synchronizing problems
I do now remember a similar issue here which I fixed by changing the Offline Address List server to one in our own Admin Group/Site and running a rebuild. We also ensured that the Offline Address List folder and the OAB Version 2 folder was replicated to the Ags/Sites that were going to have OST users. The option to mail enable will be there for any public/system folder so I wouldn't get concerned about that - I see it as well. Mark -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 November 2001 18:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OST synchronizing problems Mark, the log says the OAB did not synchronize which is the saem as the article on technet. No new Organizational forms have been created. I went to the OAB and I have the option to mail enable the OAB. This should be the same as install but should I have the option to mail enable or should it already be done? The default permissions for the OAB are set to editor which should have the rights. Again this should not have changed from install and I have not migrated from 5.5 so no forms to come over, this was a clean install that had been running OST without any problems until last week. I am sole admin for it so I can't imagine anyone has done anything, the only change was that we upgraded our backup exec to 2000. 07:50:12 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Robert Keyte' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Hierarchy 07:50:12 Synchronizing Favorites 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Large Messages' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'MS Stuff' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'nboyd' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'Sys_admin' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'upgrade' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Folder 'v-mail' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Views 07:50:12 Done 07:50:13 Microsoft Exchange offline address book 07:50:130X8004010F -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Harford Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OST synchronizing problems What does the synchronisation log say (you'll find this in the users deleted items or their dumpster if they clear out deleted items)? Also have you or any other Exchange admins for other Admin Groups made any changes to the Organizational Forms set up recently? You should check what permissions have been set on them. IIRC the default ought to be reviewer. Mark H -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2001 17:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OST synchronizing problems Exchange 2000 server with SP1 Windows 2000 server with SP2 Problem is with Clients using Outlook 2002 accross Win 2000, NT4 and Win 98 with all the latest Service packs. Gurus of the Exchange world. I am having a problem with all our Outlook 2002 laptops. We set up our external laptops with Outlook 2002, using the OST. When they hit send and receive they get the error; Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The operation failed. An object could not be found.' If I disable the offline use the error does not come up but we need to use offline store for external users. I've searched my available resources and come up with the articles below. The articles do not suggest a fix is available, has anyone else experienced this and know of a fix? The second article suggests that this is a problem with the Offline address list being uninstalled from the Exchange Server? I think this will be a PSS call but if someone has already made that call I'd appreciate the info. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q289/9/69.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q273/3/64.ASP Thanks Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential.
RE: Antigen and Email Content Filter
I like trend a lot, but if their content filter is anywhere close to the best, there's a serious problem in the content filtering arena. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antigen and Email Content Filter Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antigen and Email Content Filter
I've been using Lyris MailShield for a while with very few issues (one major one after an upgrade about a year ago, but quickly resolved). Interoperability has not been an issue. The worst thing about such products is that in order to stop the most spam, you will inadvertently stop a lot of legitimate mail. If you enable fewer anti-spam measures to allow the legitimate stuff through, you end up with a bunch of spam. Maintaining the balance has proven to be difficult, and a losing battle as the spammers catch on to the blocking techniques. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antigen and Email Content Filter Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antigen and Email Content Filter
Try and stay away from Mimesweeper. We found out the hard way that it is a single threaded app, and is only recommended (by their own tech support) for exchange servers with less than 500 users. Sybari has come out with Content filtering in their 6.5 beta. email [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antigen and Email Content Filter Take a look at Tumbleweed's MMS or Mimesweeper. Tom. -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antigen and Email Content Filter Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Antigen and Email Content Filter
I've just taken over running my companies system using Mailsweeper - it seems to do everything - it bolts into some very powerful anti-virus software and can filter on just about anything - predefined word lists, phrases, boolean expressions, it will sort into multiple containers, manage those containers itself, forward email notifications for certain types of rogue messages etc. We use a version on a standalone machine between our ISP and Exchange which seems to work very well as it is very processor intensive. I'm very impressed with it - not much spam gets through at all now. Andy Russell Exchange Admin MCSE Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security holes (text only?)
I've been searching high and low for a message formatting area, but the only thing that I keep finding is the option to enable/disable/use user preference for using Outlook Rich Text formatting of outgoing mail. I'd like to convert all imcoming mail to plain text. It seems that would be a fairly normal thing for an administrator to want to do. Am I off? = Kyle M. Burns, MCSD, MCT ECommerce Technology Manager Centra Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Security holes (text only?) You failed to mention what server you were running. But that's no big deal, because I believe you can do it in both. The problem is I'm not one to memorize menus, so I always say, look in the message formating areaI'm thinking that's where something like this is located. hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** ARTHUR: What does it say? MAYNARD: It reads, 'Here may be found the last words of Joseph of Arimathea. He who is valiant and pure of spirit may find the Holy Grail in the Castle of uuggh'. ARTHUR: What? MAYNARD: '... the Castle of uuggh'. BEDEVERE: What is that? MAYNARD: He must have died while carving it. LAUNCELOT: Oh, come on! MAYNARD: Well, that's what it says. ARTHUR: Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't bother to carve 'aah'. He'd just say it! MAYNARD: Well, that's what's carved in the rock! GALAHAD: Perhaps he was dictating. ARTHUR: Oh, shut up. *** -Original Message- From: Kyle Burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Security holes (text only?) As a programmer tasked with administering an Exchange system and not a *true* Exchange admin, I'm kind of lost when it comes to anything beyond basic administration. I've blocked unsafe extensions on attachments, but I'm seeing a lot of mime exploits and it seems to me that I can provide a much safer environment by either restricting or converting incoming email to plain-text. I've done quite a bit of rooting around slipstick to find out how to do this, but can only find Outlook client-side solutions. Is there any way that I can accomplish this server-side (I doubt that I'd be allowed to purchase a 3d party solution, but could write an extension if pointed in the right direction). Thanks = Kyle M. Burns, MCSD, MCT ECommerce Technology Manager Centra Credit Union [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails
Thanks Peter, that's a good balanced opinion. I'm not so much just looking for an argument against html (although anything which keeps message sizes smaller has got to be better for everyone) just making sure that html will have a future if we adopt it more widely. I'd missed the thought about virus scanners scanning message bodies for rogue code. So many html messages when you read them these days seem to go out to the internet to pick up the rest of the message that I was starting to get concerned about what else they may do whilst they're pulling data down. Cheers Andy Russell Exchange Admininstrator MCSE I don't think that converting all your outgoing messages to HTML will increase the chances of a virus outbreak. I'm guessing that 95% of the messages we send are HTML as it is, since all the rich text messages are converted to HTML on sending to the Internet. Furthermore, because of Kak, all the virus scanners now are capable of scanning message bodies for viruses encoded in the HTML. If you're looking for an argument against HTML message branding, I think a better one will be all the email clients still out there that probably won't be able to view them correctly. -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails Peter Thanks for your reply. re. branding emails - this is a 3rd party add on to the internet mail connector that converts the email into html and adds your logo to the top of it and also adds a sidebar giving address/contact details. It ends up looking like a framed web page. It is viruses travelling in html formatting I'm particularly interested in so I'll check the kak worm out in more detail. I think it's only a matter of time before a major virus outbreak occurs caused by mass mailing of an html newsletter fetching something from the web when it's viewed. It's everyone's worst fear having a virus where the user only has to open a message to activate it rather than having to open an attachment. Let me know what you think. Thanks Andy There have been several viruses that have tried to update themselves from internet addresses, both websites and newsgroups. There have also been a few that have travelled in the HTML formatting of e-mails, notably the kak worm. I don't think there have been any that did both, however. What do you mean by branding emails with html conversions? -Peter -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 13:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails Hi all I am trying to find if there is any evidence of virus' travelling via html format emails between systems - ie. the sort of virus that goes and fetches something off of the internet when you view the html email. There is movement in my company to start branding emails with html conversions but I think that with the increasing quantity of virus' around html email will be unpopular within a year or so and everyone will go back to rich text or plain text. Of course I could be wrong anyone seen any articles about this type of risk? I'm not talking about the direct replication of the virus in this format - more the initial infection coming in this way rather than as an attachment which is getting rather predictable now... Many thanks Andy Russell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner
I've used Trend Micro Scanmail and McAfee Groupshield with good success. NAV has given me a few problems, but nothing major. -- From: Pennell, Ronald B. Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner NOrton Anti-Virus for Exchange -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need recommendations for a good exchange virus scanner Hi, Can you give me a good virus scanner for the exchange server? The scanner should be affordable. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.5 not deleting log files
I'm running into a problem with Exch 5.5 SP4 and Veritas backup. Suddenly (as of 1 week ago), the transaction logs are not being deleted. Circular logging is disabled for both databases, and up until last week, the logs were being truncated properly. We've been having some problems with incremental backups, but full backups are running successfully -- still no cleanup of log files though. Any ideas?? Thanks, Chris Colby Manager of BackOffice Systems CourtLink Corp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5 not deleting log files
And the Flush Committed Logs option is still checked? Perhaps someone accidently unchecked it when trying to fix another problem? ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Chris Colby | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 11/28/2001 02:47 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- ---| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: 5.5 not deleting log files | ---| I'm running into a problem with Exch 5.5 SP4 and Veritas backup. Suddenly (as of 1 week ago), the transaction logs are not being deleted. Circular logging is disabled for both databases, and up until last week, the logs were being truncated properly. We've been having some problems with incremental backups, but full backups are running successfully -- still no cleanup of log files though. Any ideas?? Thanks, Chris Colby Manager of BackOffice Systems CourtLink Corp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 not deleting log files
Version of BE? -Original Message- From: Chris Colby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 not deleting log files I'm running into a problem with Exch 5.5 SP4 and Veritas backup. Suddenly (as of 1 week ago), the transaction logs are not being deleted. Circular logging is disabled for both databases, and up until last week, the logs were being truncated properly. We've been having some problems with incremental backups, but full backups are running successfully -- still no cleanup of log files though. Any ideas?? Thanks, Chris Colby Manager of BackOffice Systems CourtLink Corp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antigen and Email Content Filter
I'm running MAILSweeper 4.2 for SMTP, which does not bolt onto Exchange system at all. We use an IN-Box which sits on the DMZ and pretty much just checks for inbound Viruses, Size Restrictions, and also blocks unwanted mail by SMTP address. This box is also used as an SMTP relay so that internal UNIX/Listserv machines have a way to get mails outbound. A second box is used for Outbound mail. The great thing about MIMESweeper is that it links with most major AV Apps. (we use Sophos for MIMESweeper and the Desktop, Trend on Exchange), can do Legal Disclaimers, and does a great job of keeping unwanted e-mails completely out of the Exchange environment. If you are going to terminate an employee and delete their Exchange account, then you can put their SMTP address into a MIMESWeeper rule thus giving the ability to send out a canned response that the employee no longer works there, and also stops the DNR issue. All in all, a great product, but pretty complicated. You really need to work with the product a lot to get used to it, and Content Technologies / Baltimore does offer training and certification. (I'm certified). -Original Message- From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Antigen and Email Content Filter I've just taken over running my companies system using Mailsweeper - it seems to do everything - it bolts into some very powerful anti-virus software and can filter on just about anything - predefined word lists, phrases, boolean expressions, it will sort into multiple containers, manage those containers itself, forward email notifications for certain types of rogue messages etc. We use a version on a standalone machine between our ISP and Exchange which seems to work very well as it is very processor intensive. I'm very impressed with it - not much spam gets through at all now. Andy Russell Exchange Admin MCSE Hi: Since Sybari does not have a email filtering application for Spam who out there that uses Sybari's Antigen also uses an email content filtering agent and what brand is it? Do you have good interoperabililty? Trend seems to be the best for this however I would like to find out who uses what in conjunction with Sybari. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail, including its contents and attachments, if any, are confidential. If you are not the named recipient please notify the sender and immediately delete it. You may not disseminate, distribute, or forward this e-mail message or disclose its contents to anybody else. Copyright and any other intellectual property rights in its contents are the sole property of Cantor Fitzgerald. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should check this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. We make no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments. Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of our customers and business, we may monitor and read e-mails sent to and from our server(s). For further important information, please see http://www.cantor.com/full-disclaimer.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for help to lessen if not stop the Spam
Hey Guys and Gals, Due to the increase of unsolicited e-mail over the past few weeks, members of my university community have gotten sick of receiving these unwanted messages. While my general reaction to users who want to know how to stop this type of spam is to use their Delete Key, create an Outlook Rule, ensure that they are not advertising their e-mail addresses in public forums i.e. newsgroups, the issue has escalated to the level of our CEO and University President. A mandate has come down to find a method that will limit such types of mail while allowing the majority of other e-mail to be delivered uninterrupted and without filtering on specific phrases in e-mail. As I am sure we have all seen this before, I am actively searching the Archives for previous suggestions and have come across a few that are being investigated, however I have seen so far no mention of an ability to Filter messages based on the total number of message recipients, To+CC+BCC. While we may not be able to filter on content here, it has been suggested that if it were possible to stop messages with greater than X number of recipients then we may do so. Does anyone know if this is possible ? I know I can limit the total number of recipients in a Distribution List and for Outbound e-mail, but I do not know if it is possible for Inbound. Any ideas or suggestions? Thanks much! -dan Daniel Foerst, MCP Network Microsoft Exchange Administrator Center For Planning and Information Technology The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for help to lessen if not stop the Spam
Sorry Forgot to mention...Exchange 5.5 SP3 -dan -Original Message- From: Foerst, Daniel P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for help to lessen if not stop the Spam Hey Guys and Gals, Due to the increase of unsolicited e-mail over the past few weeks, members of my university community have gotten sick of receiving these unwanted messages. While my general reaction to users who want to know how to stop this type of spam is to use their Delete Key, create an Outlook Rule, ensure that they are not advertising their e-mail addresses in public forums i.e. newsgroups, the issue has escalated to the level of our CEO and University President. A mandate has come down to find a method that will limit such types of mail while allowing the majority of other e-mail to be delivered uninterrupted and without filtering on specific phrases in e-mail. As I am sure we have all seen this before, I am actively searching the Archives for previous suggestions and have come across a few that are being investigated, however I have seen so far no mention of an ability to Filter messages based on the total number of message recipients, To+CC+BCC. While we may not be able to filter on content here, it has been suggested that if it were possible to stop messages with greater than X number of recipients then we may do so. Does anyone know if this is possible ? I know I can limit the total number of recipients in a Distribution List and for Outbound e-mail, but I do not know if it is possible for Inbound. Any ideas or suggestions? Thanks much! -dan Daniel Foerst, MCP Network Microsoft Exchange Administrator Center For Planning and Information Technology The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue
Perhaps Sam has an older version? I see that v2.1 has recently been released, and they specifically mention a template for Exch 2000 servers. Haven't had a chance to test it yet http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/ tools/locktool.asp Hunter -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue Apply IISLockdown to an Exchange 2000 Server? You mean like what they tell you NOT to do? There is at least one technet article that tells you how to fix it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Saravanan Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IISlockdown tool and e2k issue Hi, Did anybody applied the IISlockdown tool before installing their e2k server? Since I've been having lot of problem with my e2k regarding access violation, I installed the e2k without applying the IISlockdown tool. Now I don't get any errors. I am bit paranoid that SMTP is integrated with IIS 5.0 in e2k. My question is that do I have to have the IISlockdown applied to the e2k server? I tried applying it after the e2k installation. It failed. Second, if I am going to use SSL(TSL) for my OWA, do I need port 80 opened at the firewall? Please give me your suggestion on the OWA access(through VPN, through SSL). Thanks for your help. Sam _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Looking for help to lessen if not stop the Spam
There is currently a thread being conducted titled Antigen and Email Content Filter that is discussing this very subject. Maybe a perusal of that will give you some ideas. If that runs into a blank, I'm sure the inestimable (OK-- indefatigable, maybe?) Mr. Scharff's web site will offer many suggestions: www.mail-resources.com. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Foerst, Daniel P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for help to lessen if not stop the Spam Sorry Forgot to mention...Exchange 5.5 SP3 -dan -Original Message- From: Foerst, Daniel P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Looking for help to lessen if not stop the Spam Hey Guys and Gals, Due to the increase of unsolicited e-mail over the past few weeks, members of my university community have gotten sick of receiving these unwanted messages. While my general reaction to users who want to know how to stop this type of spam is to use their Delete Key, create an Outlook Rule, ensure that they are not advertising their e-mail addresses in public forums i.e. newsgroups, the issue has escalated to the level of our CEO and University President. A mandate has come down to find a method that will limit such types of mail while allowing the majority of other e-mail to be delivered uninterrupted and without filtering on specific phrases in e-mail. As I am sure we have all seen this before, I am actively searching the Archives for previous suggestions and have come across a few that are being investigated, however I have seen so far no mention of an ability to Filter messages based on the total number of message recipients, To+CC+BCC. While we may not be able to filter on content here, it has been suggested that if it were possible to stop messages with greater than X number of recipients then we may do so. Does anyone know if this is possible ? I know I can limit the total number of recipients in a Distribution List and for Outbound e-mail, but I do not know if it is possible for Inbound. Any ideas or suggestions? Thanks much! -dan Daniel Foerst, MCP Network Microsoft Exchange Administrator Center For Planning and Information Technology The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building large number of mailboxes
Good afternoon, We used the MDB-Over-Quota-Limit and it gave us the same default as prohibit-send-storage-limit... We ran it on exchange administrator... Can anyone help We really don't want to modify 500 mailboxes manually.. Regards... Mike -Original Message- From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes MDB-Over-Quota-limit And ... Remember to set MDB-Use-Defaults to 0 Regards, Jan -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building large number of mailboxes Good morning, Exchange 5.5 SP4. Outlook 98. We are interested in building a large number of Exhange mailboxes using a template that has predetermined values in the Office field, department field and space limits. We cannot find the prohibit send and receive value to place in the CSV file. Does anyone know what this might be? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 events
Hullo... I want to write an application that will be able to filter all e-mail that passes though our Exchange 2000 servers, MAPI and SMTP. I want to be able to filter inbound mail before it is posted to the user's mailbox, and outbound mail before it actually is sent from the server. There are numerous facilities for developers bundled inside Exchange 2000, and I assume that one of them would suit my needs perfectly. However, I cannot quite get my brain around which facility that might be. My question then is what, in general terms, would be required to build a program or DLL, preferably in VB, that could be placed in a position on the server alongside Microsoft Exchange that would provide the minimal service of reading the subject of each in-bound and out-bound e-mail? My thanks in advance to any direction. Rick Ireland P.S. And, yes, I would be interested in subcontracting this initial process out... :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building large number of mailboxes
Change the value in the csv file and reimport using overwrite. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Good afternoon, We used the MDB-Over-Quota-Limit and it gave us the same default as prohibit-send-storage-limit... We ran it on exchange administrator... Can anyone help We really don't want to modify 500 mailboxes manually.. Regards... Mike -Original Message- From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes MDB-Over-Quota-limit And ... Remember to set MDB-Use-Defaults to 0 Regards, Jan -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building large number of mailboxes Good morning, Exchange 5.5 SP4. Outlook 98. We are interested in building a large number of Exhange mailboxes using a template that has predetermined values in the Office field, department field and space limits. We cannot find the prohibit send and receive value to place in the CSV file. Does anyone know what this might be? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building large number of mailboxes
Jennifer, I am sorry I did not understand what you were saying? Change the last value and re-import? What we were trying to do on this test was to see what current value people had on their mailboxes and the second and third were the same? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Change the value in the csv file and reimport using overwrite. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes Good afternoon, We used the MDB-Over-Quota-Limit and it gave us the same default as prohibit-send-storage-limit... We ran it on exchange administrator... Can anyone help We really don't want to modify 500 mailboxes manually.. Regards... Mike -Original Message- From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building large number of mailboxes MDB-Over-Quota-limit And ... Remember to set MDB-Use-Defaults to 0 Regards, Jan -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building large number of mailboxes Good morning, Exchange 5.5 SP4. Outlook 98. We are interested in building a large number of Exhange mailboxes using a template that has predetermined values in the Office field, department field and space limits. We cannot find the prohibit send and receive value to place in the CSV file. Does anyone know what this might be? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Limiting a Mailbox to internal communication only.
How can I limit a mailbox to internal communication only? I.E. no receiving or sending of internet mail. Do I just remove the SMTP address from the account? also Is it possible to limit an exchange account to a computer? In other words, I have a mailbox which I want anyone to be able access but only from our Inspection computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Limiting a Mailbox to internal communication only.
Sorry, forgot to include the version. We're running Exchange 5.5 Standard. -Original Message- From: Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Limiting a Mailbox to internal communication only. How can I limit a mailbox to internal communication only? I.E. no receiving or sending of internet mail. Do I just remove the SMTP address from the account? also Is it possible to limit an exchange account to a computer? In other words, I have a mailbox which I want anyone to be able access but only from our Inspection computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Limiting a Mailbox to internal communication only.
That will prevent them from getting mail; in order to prevent from them sending, you need to add them on the IMS Restriction tab -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Limiting a Mailbox to internal communication only. How can I limit a mailbox to internal communication only? I.E. no receiving or sending of internet mail. Do I just remove the SMTP address from the account? also Is it possible to limit an exchange account to a computer? In other words, I have a mailbox which I want anyone to be able access but only from our Inspection computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
