RE: Public Folder Reporting Tool
Get hold of the Exchange Resource Kit for Pfinfo and Pfadmin -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley;bankofamerica.com] Sent: 25 October 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Reporting Tool Does anyone know of any good PF reporting tools? I would like to be able to put the hierarchy into a text file and then add things like number of sub folders and such. Maybe a way to get ftreeinf.exe to put information into a text file? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch 2K and Exch 5.5 merge
Hi, There is an Exchange 2000 org running in native mode. There is also a separate Exch 5.5 org. Is it possible to migrate Exch 5.5 so it could join the existing Exch 2000 org? Only migration of 5.5 mailboxes is needed. Thanks and regards, Alexey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations
Cheers for the advice. CA suggested that we increase the OpenRetryDelay value to 12 seconds and allow background scanning at the weekends. The first run was this weekend, and so far it does seem to have improved things (no archiving or synchronization errors for me this morning). Here's hoping. Thanks, Loftus Greig. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: 25 October 2002 18:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations VSAPI sort of gets between the client and the server, so if its performance is bad, everyone will notice it. However, VSAPI, at least in theory, will catch everything its patterns are capable of catching. MAPI runs in the background, but can miss viruses if it can't keep up with the load. However, it has less impact on your load because it's secondary. It sounds like your problem is related to either an inefficient virus scanner, an overloaded system, a resource problem (such as insufficient memory or processor), or both. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations Hello - [NT4 Server SP6a, Exchange enterprise 5.5 SP4] Has anyone used and compared Exchange anti-virus products that employ different scanning methods, e.g. MAPI/VSAPI/ESE? I'm curious about the performance differences between the implementations. We're currently using a VSAPI-based product and the performance is pretty dreadful - loads of archiving/synchronization errors and people with incomplete offline mailbox replicas. The anti-virus software is patched and up-to-date and we've adjusted the OpenRetryDelay several times, to no avail. The server hosts about 120 active mailboxes - some pretty big - but the store databases have a dedicated 6-drive, ultra 160 SCSI, raid 5 volume. The transaction logs are on a different volume. PRIV.EDB is currently about 45GB in size and the problem affects every user on the server. I just wondered if there were any outright conclusions that favoured one approach or product over the others. Also, I'd be interested if anyone can confirm that the VSAPI interface builds a single, potentially long queue of attachments to be scanned, introducing a bottleneck ? Thanks, Loftus Greig _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Scheduled offline defrags?
I tend to err on the side of caution here. I don't do any defrags unless I absolutely have to (say after a large amount fo deletions or some such, or if MS PSS tells me to). The reason is that I had a bad experience with a defrag for a customer over a year ago where the attachment table became corrupt after the defrag. Not pretty. Now I go by the rule 'if it ain't broke - don't fix it'. I keep an eyeball on the event logs for anything suspicious and if nothing shows up I am a happy camper. Cheers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Daniel Chenault Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 07:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Scheduled offline defrags? I was asked that at the Boston MEC in 98 onstage. Up there with me was Joseph Pagano, author of the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper, and Laurion Burchall, the developer for the JET database. I handed the question over to Laurion and he said it's only necessary if you have deleted a lot of data and want to recover the white space. Same applies to 2K. -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:JClishe;sequoianet.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Scheduled offline defrags? Does anyone perform regular offline defrags of your Exchange 2000 database(s)? I've heard/read conflicting reports about this; I know people that like to do it on a quarterly basis, and I also know people that say it should only performed after a large amount of mailbox moves or deletions. I could swear that I've seen an MS Q article that said not to perform offline defrags just for the sake of doing it, to only do it after a large amount of moves or deletions, but for the life of me I can't find that article now. Does anyone know the article I'm talking about, or have links to any other resources that discuss this topic? Thanks Jason Clishe Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Business: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
You can enable polling on the client, but I dont think you can adjust the interval. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone To be more correct, the server does not really push either. The server sends a UDP frame to the client telling it that it's time to refresh the view and show a new message. But they still call this process polling. In fact if Outlook is behind a firewall that blocks UDP frames, Outlook will never receive a new message notification from the server and will never refresh its view. For these occasions, there is an article on MS support website that describes how to adjust Outlook's polling intervals so that it would not even have to wait for the server's new mail notification UDP frame. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 7:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone OL in Exchange mode does not poll. The server pushes. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:41 AM Subject: Re: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone I wonder if some how Outlook is constantly polling the Email server for new messages. Not sure of where in Reg to look but maybe it is set to some really low number and that is causing the delays. Just a guess. - Original Message - From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:30 AM Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone How about doing a repair of office, or uninstalling and reinstalling? Also see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q241425 And http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q255259 For starters . . . James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone I deleted the Profiles and set up new ones and the problem is still there Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone How about recreating the Outlook profiles in question? -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hopefully Andy will see this too Ok I have checked the machines in Question... 1. CPU jumps pretty High and stays there when doing anything in Outlook related 2. This problem seems to be just with a few people and not everyone 3. There is no Excessive Memory usage and besides what I mention above CPU seems ok 4. I have set all Nics to be 100/full on both the server and workstations 5. I have turned off Virus Scanner 6. I have Defragged Hard Drives 7. I have Sacrificed a Chicken to appease the Gods (I was unable to find a Virgin) I'm just not sure what else to look at End Users who have the problem are running Windows XP Pro with Office 2000, but so is everyone else. Any other Ideas? Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone What have you done to fix it? What's changed lately? Has it always done this? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan;Profit-Lab.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an e-mail without an attachment. Currently everyone is running Windows XP and Office 2000 Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 Its got me stumped because some people do not have any
RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations
CA support actually got back to you? Stunning! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:l.greig;searchspace.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations Cheers for the advice. CA suggested that we increase the OpenRetryDelay value to 12 seconds and allow background scanning at the weekends. The first run was this weekend, and so far it does seem to have improved things (no archiving or synchronization errors for me this morning). Here's hoping. Thanks, Loftus Greig. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: 25 October 2002 18:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations VSAPI sort of gets between the client and the server, so if its performance is bad, everyone will notice it. However, VSAPI, at least in theory, will catch everything its patterns are capable of catching. MAPI runs in the background, but can miss viruses if it can't keep up with the load. However, it has less impact on your load because it's secondary. It sounds like your problem is related to either an inefficient virus scanner, an overloaded system, a resource problem (such as insufficient memory or processor), or both. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations Hello - [NT4 Server SP6a, Exchange enterprise 5.5 SP4] Has anyone used and compared Exchange anti-virus products that employ different scanning methods, e.g. MAPI/VSAPI/ESE? I'm curious about the performance differences between the implementations. We're currently using a VSAPI-based product and the performance is pretty dreadful - loads of archiving/synchronization errors and people with incomplete offline mailbox replicas. The anti-virus software is patched and up-to-date and we've adjusted the OpenRetryDelay several times, to no avail. The server hosts about 120 active mailboxes - some pretty big - but the store databases have a dedicated 6-drive, ultra 160 SCSI, raid 5 volume. The transaction logs are on a different volume. PRIV.EDB is currently about 45GB in size and the problem affects every user on the server. I just wondered if there were any outright conclusions that favoured one approach or product over the others. Also, I'd be interested if anyone can confirm that the VSAPI interface builds a single, potentially long queue of attachments to be scanned, introducing a bottleneck ? Thanks, Loftus Greig _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Faxing - SMTP header and message body format
User Group We are using FAXserve for Windows and this is integrated into exchange. So if a user wants to send a FAX within Outlook in the TO field the user will put [FAX:0207123987421] and then put in the body of the email what ever they want to fax. We would like to be able to fax using an smtp address and send a fax from outside Exchange. Can any one please tell me how you can do this. When a user sends a fax exchange sends the mail as an smtp mail from one server to another. So I am thinking why can't we use smtp? 1. We could purchase the fax/smtp gateway but this is only going to create more administration overhead (we do not want another server to look after). 2. How does Exchange interpret the fax address and know how to route it to the faxserver? 3. I feel that technically there should be no reason why I can't send an smtp mail into Exchange because the fax server is the gateway and should do the rendering. Can any one point me in the right direction or come up with any positive comments (Fax vendor has not been helpful). Regards ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format
Marc Can't you create a custom recipient with the SMTP address that translates to the FAX address?? Or do you want to fax directly to FAXserve without using Exchange? I use ZetaFax extensively and this cannot be done, it has to go through exchange if you want to use an SMTP address. Otherwise you have to print to a print spooler but this avoids exchange and SMTP. Regards Graham -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 12:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format User Group We are using FAXserve for Windows and this is integrated into exchange. So if a user wants to send a FAX within Outlook in the TO field the user will put [FAX:0207123987421] and then put in the body of the email what ever they want to fax. We would like to be able to fax using an smtp address and send a fax from outside Exchange. Can any one please tell me how you can do this. When a user sends a fax exchange sends the mail as an smtp mail from one server to another. So I am thinking why can't we use smtp? 1. We could purchase the fax/smtp gateway but this is only going to create more administration overhead (we do not want another server to look after). 2. How does Exchange interpret the fax address and know how to route it to the faxserver? 3. I feel that technically there should be no reason why I can't send an smtp mail into Exchange because the fax server is the gateway and should do the rendering. Can any one point me in the right direction or come up with any positive comments (Fax vendor has not been helpful). Regards ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This Email is intended for the recipient mentioned, it's contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately, without copying or onward transmission. In so far as the message in this email contains any form of offer to enter into or vary any contract as email communication is insecure such offer is subject to verification by ourselves, any offer is subject to signature and completion of our standard terms and business conditions. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this company or any of its affiliates. The contents of this message has been virus checked using Trend Micro ScanMail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SP3
Unlike other vendors that make you go through a logic tree to decide which patch packages to install, Microsoft makes it easy. Just install the latest package for your application and/or OS. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus;intas.be] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SP3 Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5
Running Exchange 5.5 on a .NET server will very likely demonstrate a big difference between Does it work? and Is it supported?. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 01:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 Interesting. I had a few people comment that they where not going to 2000 instead just wait till .Net and Titanium to come out. Instead of upgrading twice. I wonder what the migration would be to go from 5.5 on Nt4.0 to the new stuff. Early indications is that you should go to 2000 first. I haven't seen or read much on this. - Original Message - From: Julian Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 8:06 PM Subject: RE: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 I am also an MS beta tester for .Net \ Titanium \ Office 11 etc. and the only supported option for .Net will be Titanium only, i.e. no 5.5 or 2000. Yours, Julian Stone -Original Message- From: Bob [mailto:bob;simister.org.uk] Sent: 27 October 2002 20:17 pm To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 Hi I'm a microsoft beta tester for .NET and have just installed 3xchange 5.5 on .net server and it works ok Bob - Original Message - From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 5:30 PM Subject: RE: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 Thanks, I guess I should be a bit more clear, I'm not looking for any change in the 5.5 program or for it to be aware of anything. I just want the services to start if I choose to upgrade a NT4 box to a .NET box. As in the upgrade path to Exchange2000 required the NT4 system first upgrade to Win2K, my thinking is for us holdouts to be attracted to the next Exchange version beyond Exchange2000, a upgrade path will probably be made available. That means NT4 - .NET first (hopefully). -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 Do I know for sure? No. Can I make an educated guess? Yes. No, 5.5 will not be made .NET aware. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:brett.finch;hrs.ualberta.ca] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Net Server and Exchange 5.5 Well I know SPK3 for Exchange2K was released for compatibility with .Net server but I am assuming it was more of a ADS issue. Does anyone know (or are they now) if running 5.5 on a .NET server is being done. I know MS hopes the last of us NT4 die hards go to .Net and AD 1.1 which is exactly what we are planning for. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SP3
Yeah, try working with SMS :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SP3 Unlike other vendors that make you go through a logic tree to decide which patch packages to install, Microsoft makes it easy. Just install the latest package for your application and/or OS. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus;intas.be] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SP3 Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SP3
You mean the System Mangler Service. Nah... I love running around with a 96 disk CD carrier to rebuild systems on the desk. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SP3 Yeah, try working with SMS :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SP3 Unlike other vendors that make you go through a logic tree to decide which patch packages to install, Microsoft makes it easy. Just install the latest package for your application and/or OS. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus;intas.be] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SP3 Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exch 2K and Exch 5.5 merge
Exmerge - Original Message - From: Alexey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:59 AM Subject: Exch 2K and Exch 5.5 merge Hi, There is an Exchange 2000 org running in native mode. There is also a separate Exch 5.5 org. Is it possible to migrate Exch 5.5 so it could join the existing Exch 2000 org? Only migration of 5.5 mailboxes is needed. Thanks and regards, Alexey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SP3
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, at 8:57am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unlike other vendors that make you go through a logic tree to decide which patch packages to install, Microsoft makes it easy. Just install the latest package for your application and/or OS. Unless it's Microsoft Office. Or the Microsoft VM. Or WebDAV. Or MS-XML. Or... -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
The number I recall is 200 Mapi concurrent connections. But there may be a bag of salt that goes with that as well. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Why does it stick in my head that you were limited to a Number of mapi connections in the range of a few hundred pre box? Why on earth would I think that.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users What is the setting in IIS configured for? Otherwise... lots! William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum OWA concurrent users MSX55+SP4 1 MSXorganization 1 server Does anobody know the maximum OWA concurrent users allowed in MSX55enterprise version? and MSX5.5 non-enterprise version? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
And the Uranium power source? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:Petschow;cdnet.cod.edu] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yes it is true you will be able to do RPC over HTTP so a VPN will not be needed. It will require .NET server, Exchange Titanium and Outlook 11. Jeff -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well I heard that the new version of OWA will have built-in VPN type connections with RPC being the way to communicate. Is that true? - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:05 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That what? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That oh great tentacled one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users IIS 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 or 2000: as many as your bandwidth will take. Very nice. IIS 4.0 and Exchange 5.5: 200, tops. Once you hit more than 5 active server page requests per second on that box, the server tanks. Whitepapers, shmitepapers. My minions in PSS all know the awful truth: use one IIS 4.0 OWA box per 200 users in a 5.5 environment, or the whole thing goes PFFFT! Of course, if you're dealing with licensing, it's one user per license. Some companies can buy web-only licensing for cheap, but most pay for a regular CAL, which doesn't discriminate between MAPI and OWA users. One license, one user. Or something like that. They change licensing info every 32 seconds, so try to time your calls appropriately to get the same answer twice. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yep I heard that 100 user theory too but with the new hardware and IIS, I really haven't heard anything from some deployments where OWA was a featured way of getting emails for users. The only thing is when a user connects for the first time then subsequent connections are quicker. Which makes wonder if there could be a way of preloading users laptops/desktops to have those files? - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:00 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users According to a white paper that came out some 4 years ago, Microsoft estimated OWA 5.5 on IIS 4 was limited to 700-800 concurrent light users. ( read three emails a day average, replying to 5). Estimates for heavy users (8 emails a day,reply to about 20) was around 100 concurrent per box. But of course, the amount of resources determine the actual amount supported. We're all light users right? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Hey! Your in the Jr Cadet league too! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well go find the answer then report Back Jr Cadet Blackstone. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I dunno, But I was thinking the same thing though I don't have any evidence
RE: virus like behavior friendgreetings.com
FYI, is appears this worm also is a p0rn spammer. http://www.msnbc.com/news/826033.asp?0dm=C13HT John J. Steniger -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:Gordon.Morrison;Bain.com] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: virus like behavior friendgreetings.com I have had a couple of reports from users this morning saying that have received an email from people containing a link to an e-card at www.friendgreetings.com, when they click on it the web site starts going through their address book and emailing everyone an e-card on the user's behalf. acts like a virus, but doesn't look like one to scanners. /Gordon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchagne 5.5 SP5
Anyone have any info regarding a pending SP5 for Exchange 5.5? Is there one pending; if so, when... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchagne 5.5 SP5
I believe SP4 was the last. -Original Message- From: Wayne Dockery [mailto:wayne;dockery.biz] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchagne 5.5 SP5 Anyone have any info regarding a pending SP5 for Exchange 5.5? Is there one pending; if so, when... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 SP5
I'll be brave (as Im no exch guru) and add a P.S. P.S. There are some post sp4 updates bill -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone;superioraccess.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchagne 5.5 SP5 I believe SP4 was the last. -Original Message- From: Wayne Dockery [mailto:wayne;dockery.biz] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchagne 5.5 SP5 Anyone have any info regarding a pending SP5 for Exchange 5.5? Is there one pending; if so, when... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT :: Scripting List
Does anyone know of a good list like this one, for Scripting in Windows? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Senior Network Engineer Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Cell: (864) 449-9912 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.profit-lab.com http://ncontrol.info The greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fall. -- Confucius _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
I'll ask a Q.. on this topic IF it is going to be that you will be able to do RPC via HTTP... It's that kind'a wide open? Would you want to like run it over HTTPS or still thru a VPN too kind'a keep in secure? bill -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users And the Uranium power source? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:Petschow;cdnet.cod.edu] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yes it is true you will be able to do RPC over HTTP so a VPN will not be needed. It will require .NET server, Exchange Titanium and Outlook 11. Jeff -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well I heard that the new version of OWA will have built-in VPN type connections with RPC being the way to communicate. Is that true? - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:05 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That what? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That oh great tentacled one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users IIS 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 or 2000: as many as your bandwidth will take. Very nice. IIS 4.0 and Exchange 5.5: 200, tops. Once you hit more than 5 active server page requests per second on that box, the server tanks. Whitepapers, shmitepapers. My minions in PSS all know the awful truth: use one IIS 4.0 OWA box per 200 users in a 5.5 environment, or the whole thing goes PFFFT! Of course, if you're dealing with licensing, it's one user per license. Some companies can buy web-only licensing for cheap, but most pay for a regular CAL, which doesn't discriminate between MAPI and OWA users. One license, one user. Or something like that. They change licensing info every 32 seconds, so try to time your calls appropriately to get the same answer twice. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yep I heard that 100 user theory too but with the new hardware and IIS, I really haven't heard anything from some deployments where OWA was a featured way of getting emails for users. The only thing is when a user connects for the first time then subsequent connections are quicker. Which makes wonder if there could be a way of preloading users laptops/desktops to have those files? - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:00 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users According to a white paper that came out some 4 years ago, Microsoft estimated OWA 5.5 on IIS 4 was limited to 700-800 concurrent light users. ( read three emails a day average, replying to 5). Estimates for heavy users (8 emails a day,reply to about 20) was around 100 concurrent per box. But of course, the amount of resources determine the actual amount supported. We're all light users right? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Hey! Your in the Jr Cadet league too! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well go find the answer then report Back Jr Cadet
RE: Public Folder Reporting Tool
This is NOT a good Public Folder reporting tool - but as it gets the result in about a minute, it could be quicker than searching for a tool on the Internet... Take this code, and cut and paste it into a text file with a .VBS extension. Double click on the file. Then look in C:\Temp (or a different directory if you change the first few lines). '=StartOfCode set fso = wscript.createobject(Scripting.FileSystemObject) set folder=fso.getFolder(C:\Temp) Set OStream = fso.CreateTextFile(C:\temp\ExchangePublicFolders.txt) OStream.writeLine Public Folder Hieararchy OStream.writeLine OStream.writeLine ' mySpaces = SUB LookThroughFolder (thisFolder) mySpaces = mySpaces for each SubFolder in thisFolder OSTream.WriteLine mySpaces SubFolder.name if SubFolder.folders.count 0 then LookThroughFolder SubFolder.Folders End if next mySpaces = Left(mySpaces,len(mySpaces)-5) END SUB set OL = GetObject(,OUTLOOK.APPLICATION) set MAPI = OL.GetNamespace(MAPI) ' ' Step through all stores in your profile ' MsgBox Looking for all Public Folders . . . for each Store in MAPI.FOLDERS if Store.Name = Public Folders Then LookThroughFolder (Store.Folders) end if Next MsgBox Finished looking through the Public Folders. 'Now close the output file Set OStream = Nothing set fso = nothing set folder=nothing 'EndOfCode= -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley;bankofamerica.com] Sent: 25 October 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Reporting Tool Does anyone know of any good PF reporting tools? I would like to be able to put the hierarchy into a text file and then add things like number of sub folders and such. Maybe a way to get ftreeinf.exe to put information into a text file? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format
Graham We use Exchange 2000 (sorry Should have mentioned this) and I did try using a contact with an smtp address but this was not successful. Sorry are you saying that you send smtp messages into exchange so that Zeetafax is able to interpret the email? Your second point sounds feasible and I have not tried it using a print spooler. What I am trying to do is send an automated fax from a unix box. So I don't know if we could send a unix print job to the fax server? How do you send your print jobs to the fax server? Regards -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:graham.walsh;telinet.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:FW: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Marc Can't you create a custom recipient with the SMTP address that translates to the FAX address?? Or do you want to fax directly to FAXserve without using Exchange? I use ZetaFax extensively and this cannot be done, it has to go through exchange if you want to use an SMTP address. Otherwise you have to print to a print spooler but this avoids exchange and SMTP. Regards Graham -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 12:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format User Group We are using FAXserve for Windows and this is integrated into exchange. So if a user wants to send a FAX within Outlook in the TO field the user will put [FAX:0207123987421] and then put in the body of the email what ever they want to fax. We would like to be able to fax using an smtp address and send a fax from outside Exchange. Can any one please tell me how you can do this. When a user sends a fax exchange sends the mail as an smtp mail from one server to another. So I am thinking why can't we use smtp? 1. We could purchase the fax/smtp gateway but this is only going to create more administration overhead (we do not want another server to look after). 2. How does Exchange interpret the fax address and know how to route it to the faxserver? 3. I feel that technically there should be no reason why I can't send an smtp mail into Exchange because the fax server is the gateway and should do the rendering. Can any one point me in the right direction or come up with any positive comments (Fax vendor has not been helpful). Regards ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This Email is intended for the recipient mentioned, it's contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately, without copying or onward transmission. In so far as the message in this email contains any form of offer to enter into or vary any contract as email communication is insecure such offer is subject to verification by ourselves, any offer is subject to signature and completion of our standard terms and business conditions. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this company or any of its affiliates. The contents of this message has been virus checked using Trend Micro ScanMail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
Comp Time Question
Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
And, with the known RPC issues of timing and drop-outs when running it over a slow link, what will happen when it is tunnelled through HTTP?? -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I'll ask a Q.. on this topic IF it is going to be that you will be able to do RPC via HTTP... It's that kind'a wide open? Would you want to like run it over HTTPS or still thru a VPN too kind'a keep in secure? bill -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users And the Uranium power source? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:Petschow;cdnet.cod.edu] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yes it is true you will be able to do RPC over HTTP so a VPN will not be needed. It will require .NET server, Exchange Titanium and Outlook 11. Jeff -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well I heard that the new version of OWA will have built-in VPN type connections with RPC being the way to communicate. Is that true? - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:05 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That what? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That oh great tentacled one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users IIS 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 or 2000: as many as your bandwidth will take. Very nice. IIS 4.0 and Exchange 5.5: 200, tops. Once you hit more than 5 active server page requests per second on that box, the server tanks. Whitepapers, shmitepapers. My minions in PSS all know the awful truth: use one IIS 4.0 OWA box per 200 users in a 5.5 environment, or the whole thing goes PFFFT! Of course, if you're dealing with licensing, it's one user per license. Some companies can buy web-only licensing for cheap, but most pay for a regular CAL, which doesn't discriminate between MAPI and OWA users. One license, one user. Or something like that. They change licensing info every 32 seconds, so try to time your calls appropriately to get the same answer twice. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yep I heard that 100 user theory too but with the new hardware and IIS, I really haven't heard anything from some deployments where OWA was a featured way of getting emails for users. The only thing is when a user connects for the first time then subsequent connections are quicker. Which makes wonder if there could be a way of preloading users laptops/desktops to have those files? - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:00 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users According to a white paper that came out some 4 years ago, Microsoft estimated OWA 5.5 on IIS 4 was limited to 700-800 concurrent light users. ( read three emails a day average, replying to 5). Estimates for heavy users (8 emails a day,reply to about 20) was around 100 concurrent per box. But of course, the amount of resources determine the actual amount supported. We're all light users right? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users
RPC will be available in Outlook 11. Other yes still use VPN for now. - Original Message - From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:53 AM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I'll ask a Q.. on this topic IF it is going to be that you will be able to do RPC via HTTP... It's that kind'a wide open? Would you want to like run it over HTTPS or still thru a VPN too kind'a keep in secure? bill -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users And the Uranium power source? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Petschow, Jeff [mailto:Petschow;cdnet.cod.edu] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yes it is true you will be able to do RPC over HTTP so a VPN will not be needed. It will require .NET server, Exchange Titanium and Outlook 11. Jeff -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well I heard that the new version of OWA will have built-in VPN type connections with RPC being the way to communicate. Is that true? - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:05 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That what? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 8:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users That oh great tentacled one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users IIS 5.0 and Exchange 5.5 or 2000: as many as your bandwidth will take. Very nice. IIS 4.0 and Exchange 5.5: 200, tops. Once you hit more than 5 active server page requests per second on that box, the server tanks. Whitepapers, shmitepapers. My minions in PSS all know the awful truth: use one IIS 4.0 OWA box per 200 users in a 5.5 environment, or the whole thing goes PFFFT! Of course, if you're dealing with licensing, it's one user per license. Some companies can buy web-only licensing for cheap, but most pay for a regular CAL, which doesn't discriminate between MAPI and OWA users. One license, one user. Or something like that. They change licensing info every 32 seconds, so try to time your calls appropriately to get the same answer twice. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users Yep I heard that 100 user theory too but with the new hardware and IIS, I really haven't heard anything from some deployments where OWA was a featured way of getting emails for users. The only thing is when a user connects for the first time then subsequent connections are quicker. Which makes wonder if there could be a way of preloading users laptops/desktops to have those files? - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 7:00 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users According to a white paper that came out some 4 years ago, Microsoft estimated OWA 5.5 on IIS 4 was limited to 700-800 concurrent light users. ( read three emails a day average, replying to 5). Estimates for heavy users (8 emails a day,reply to about 20) was around 100 concurrent per box. But of course, the amount of resources determine the actual amount supported. We're all light users right? -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October
RE: Comp Time Question
Nope. You have to work an EXTRA 4 hours to fix all the problems you introduced in the first 4 hours. We are professionals you know getting paid for what we do is purely a bonus! :-) -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Most cases the MIS Director has the authority to compensate his employee for work outside the normal operating hours. Mostly it is an unofficial policy that most HR's will not put in writing, but, left to the discretion of management. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Brian: If I understand it correctly The answer is that it depends. If you are salaried or hourly. Hourly anything over 40hrs you should be compensated. Salary not always the case. This is usually up to your employer. since if you work 30hrs you still get your same salary and if you work 45 hours the salary is still the same. Some business will be nice and give there employees comp time for anything over 40hrs however that is generally up to the employer -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
No comp time here unless the boss is just being a nice guy. Fortunately, my boss does what he can for our team. -- From: Bob Sadler Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax: 401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Well I work Local Government (city) and I am hourly. Heres how we do ours. Comp time: If you work one hour you get 1.5 hours back in return. Comp time is used before any other time that you have (annual/sick/personal day). Comp time is easier to get approved on short notice, like if you decide at lunch that you want to take the rest of the day off and you have the comp time for it, then most likely it will not be a problem. -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Nope. You have to work an EXTRA 4 hours to fix all the problems you introduced in the first 4 hours. We are professionals you know getting paid for what we do is purely a bonus! :-) -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ex2k and IIS Problem
We installed EX2k in August for our Students 2 back end servers - Ex2k with SP2 on Advanced Server with SP3 - this holds the 17000 student mailboxes - all appears to be fine here. Compaq Utilities installed on both - These are connected to a SAN. Originally 1 front end server - dual PIII processors with 1Gb RAM, EX2k SP2 with Advanced Server SP3 - this is/was for Incoming External mail (via our Sendmail server) and OWA. This server would regularly stop its IIS and Exchange Services with error code 7031 - This believes that there is a code red worm on the server - but the server has been patched from Windows Update. So a second Front end server was put in place for OWA - same build but was stable until the 1st FE was rebuilt. Everything was put through to the 2nd FE. 1st FE came up with no problems but 2nd FE then started having the same problem as the 1st before the rebuild. SMTP mail put back to 1st Server - everything was stable until 2nd FE was rebuilt - 2nd now stable but 1st no longer. The 2nd was rebuilt without the Compaq Utilities and with additional RAm - now 1.75GB 1st server also started having other problems which have all been resolved apart from the original 7031 - services termintating unexpectedly. Has anyone seen this problem, know of a fix, or can point me in the right direction Please??? Thanks in advance Helen Best Bournemouth University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
It's funny this question has come up as I was just reading an article in Network Computing (the web site actually) dealing with comp time. For me it was an eye opener. For example, just because someone is salary does not mean they are exempt from OT pay. Another part was that comp time is not a replacement for overtime pay. If you are non-exempt, you are stilll due OT even if your employer gives you comp time. Of course, before confronting an employer you should contact the Wage and Hour divison of the Labor Department to find out for sure whether you are exempt or non-exempt. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:Durham;txkusa.org] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Well I work Local Government (city) and I am hourly. Heres how we do ours. Comp time: If you work one hour you get 1.5 hours back in return. Comp time is used before any other time that you have (annual/sick/personal day). Comp time is easier to get approved on short notice, like if you decide at lunch that you want to take the rest of the day off and you have the comp time for it, then most likely it will not be a problem. -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Nope. You have to work an EXTRA 4 hours to fix all the problems you introduced in the first 4 hours. We are professionals you know getting paid for what we do is purely a bonus! :-) -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
We have a formal Comp Time policy, it's a 1 for 1 and we can pool up to 80 hours. I have also worked in places that were not so formal, that was more of a give/take type deal. Usually unless it's 2 or more hours I'm not turning it in, it all works out after you add in lunches, leaving 10min early, getting in 10min late etc... -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Do you have a link to this article? Brian -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question It's funny this question has come up as I was just reading an article in Network Computing (the web site actually) dealing with comp time. For me it was an eye opener. For example, just because someone is salary does not mean they are exempt from OT pay. Another part was that comp time is not a replacement for overtime pay. If you are non-exempt, you are stilll due OT even if your employer gives you comp time. Of course, before confronting an employer you should contact the Wage and Hour divison of the Labor Department to find out for sure whether you are exempt or non-exempt. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:Durham;txkusa.org] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Well I work Local Government (city) and I am hourly. Heres how we do ours. Comp time: If you work one hour you get 1.5 hours back in return. Comp time is used before any other time that you have (annual/sick/personal day). Comp time is easier to get approved on short notice, like if you decide at lunch that you want to take the rest of the day off and you have the comp time for it, then most likely it will not be a problem. -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Nope. You have to work an EXTRA 4 hours to fix all the problems you introduced in the first 4 hours. We are professionals you know getting paid for what we do is purely a bonus! :-) -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format
Marc I am running Ex 5.5 with ZetaFax and I have just created a custom recipient with a ZetaFax address and it will send it to the fax server to be converted and then faxed. The address appears in GAL. With ZetaFax, it installs virtual printers (which are spool files). When you print to the printer, it creates a file and then pops up the sender details. This then sends through the ZetaFax server. Obviously this would require some manual input but you want it automated. The other downside is that ZetaFax is only for Windows and not Unit. Is the address it is sent to always the same or does it change each time?? I have searched google and come up with ActiveFax http://www.actfax.com/. Their product supports Unix printing. I have not used the product before, but you could contact them and see if the programme can automate faxes. Regards Graham Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDI: 020 7642 4021 ZetaFax: 020 7642 4071 Switchboard: 020 7771 7700 Main Fax: 020 7771 7799 -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Graham We use Exchange 2000 (sorry Should have mentioned this) and I did try using a contact with an smtp address but this was not successful. Sorry are you saying that you send smtp messages into exchange so that Zeetafax is able to interpret the email? Your second point sounds feasible and I have not tried it using a print spooler. What I am trying to do is send an automated fax from a unix box. So I don't know if we could send a unix print job to the fax server? How do you send your print jobs to the fax server? Regards -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:graham.walsh;telinet.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:FW: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Marc Can't you create a custom recipient with the SMTP address that translates to the FAX address?? Or do you want to fax directly to FAXserve without using Exchange? I use ZetaFax extensively and this cannot be done, it has to go through exchange if you want to use an SMTP address. Otherwise you have to print to a print spooler but this avoids exchange and SMTP. Regards Graham -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 12:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format User Group We are using FAXserve for Windows and this is integrated into exchange. So if a user wants to send a FAX within Outlook in the TO field the user will put [FAX:0207123987421] and then put in the body of the email what ever they want to fax. We would like to be able to fax using an smtp address and send a fax from outside Exchange. Can any one please tell me how you can do this. When a user sends a fax exchange sends the mail as an smtp mail from one server to another. So I am thinking why can't we use smtp? 1. We could purchase the fax/smtp gateway but this is only going to create more administration overhead (we do not want another server to look after). 2. How does Exchange interpret the fax address and know how to route it to the faxserver? 3. I feel that technically there should be no reason why I can't send an smtp mail into Exchange because the fax server is the gateway and should do the rendering. Can any one point me in the right direction or come up with any positive comments (Fax vendor has not been helpful). Regards ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This Email is intended for the recipient mentioned, it's contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately, without copying or onward transmission. In so far as the message in this email contains any form of offer to enter into or vary any contract as email communication is insecure such offer is subject to verification by ourselves, any
permissions in e2k
In the past, with 5.5, we used to remove the domain Admins group from the local administrators box from our Exchange servers. Since I've had some permission issues with e2k, I wanted to do the same thing with the e2k box. I just want to remove the domain admins group from the e2k server. Does anyone know if I can do this, or will it have a negative impact on e2k? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Our policy here is that even though we are exempt, we still get compensated...up to a certain pay grade. We are exempt, but still have an hourly rate for the purposes of OT. Our exempt ranks start with a Grade 21 and go to something like a Grade 32(this would be like the VP of the entire global company). Grades 21-24 are paid anything over 40 hours/week at 1.5x your hourly rate. Grades 25-27 are paid OT at regular hourly rates, for anything over 40 hours. Grades 28 and above just donate all extra time to the company. However, Grades 25 and up have the ability to come in for 1/2 a day and claim a full days wages...just because they are expected to work more flexible hours, I suppose. We also have Flex time, where we are allowed to flex 4 hours in our work schedule, per week. So I could take the rest of the day off at noon, if I knew I was going to come in for four hours on Saturday, or come in at noon tomorrow, if I had to stay till 8pm tonight. It all works out in the end. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:jrwaters;co.hanover.va.us] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question We have a formal Comp Time policy, it's a 1 for 1 and we can pool up to 80 hours. I have also worked in places that were not so formal, that was more of a give/take type deal. Usually unless it's 2 or more hours I'm not turning it in, it all works out after you add in lunches, leaving 10min early, getting in 10min late etc... -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joining Site
Trying to run /forestprep and when I goto join an existing 5.5 site, it asks me for a server name from the 5.5 Site, and when I enter it it comes back with an error stating I don't have the permissions required to complete the operation. Has anyone come accross this, or able to lend a helping hand. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to hidde DLs ?
MSX2000+SP3 1 forest multiple W2K-AD domains (A+B+C+D)+ each domain has its own MSX2000+SP3 but due to W2K-AD they see a common GAL Is there anyway to allow a DL created in Domain A to behaves like this in the GAL: a) not viewable from other domains (only from users in domain A) b) viewable just for some users in domain A and some others in Domain B, C and D thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Joining Site
Have you run ADC already? If not, then this is probably your problem. Essentially, you have to use ADC to clone your Exchange 5.5 site services account into AD. E2K needs this in order to join your existing Exchange 5.5 site. This is because E2K cannot use NT4 accounts, so you have to clone your E55 site services account to make it an W2K/AD security principle. Once this is done, you can use this account to provide pass-thru authentication to your E55 environment. Here is a decent document: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/SixSteps.doc Also, be certain to read all of your ADC documentation (you want the E2K, not the W2K version of the ADC) Also, there are tons of books out there that give step-by-step instructions for setting this up and configuring it. If you have already installed, configured and are sync'ing using ADC, then read through the documentation and find your permissions issue. There are a lot of nit-picky little permissions things that can foul this up and you have to get all the details right. Did you set this up and test it out in your test lab? Trying to run /forestprep and when I goto join an existing 5.5 site, it asks me for a server name from the 5.5 Site, and when I enter it it comes back with an error stating I don't have the permissions required to complete the operation. Has anyone come accross this, or able to lend a helping hand. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 on vmware server
Hi Everyone I'm trying to set up a test network using vmware on a Windows 2000 server. I've set up 2 domain controllers and several other servers, but am having problems setting up Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 virtual machine (set up as a member server in the domain). The error I'm getting is as follows: While attending to stop the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service, the following error was encountered: the requested control is not valid for this service. Microsoft Windows NT ID 0xc002041c This occurs after the files are copied to the virtual server (ie I've nearly got to the end of a normal install). After it's happened (I've tried several times!), the Exchange services services are present but not started (you can't start them manually). There's no entry in the Control panel Add remove/software to enable easy removal to allow another installation attempt, but I've tried manual removal of the exchange registry entries without success. I've also tried on another virtual machine with a clean W2K installation with the same results. The machines have 256M memory, and we're using the host-only networking configuaration. The Microsoft KB simply says they don't support this and the vmware support KB doesn't appear to have anything relevant. I seem to remember a couple of people on this list saying they used vmware, so how did you do it?! Cathy Jackson Sheffield Hallam University, UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Joining Site
What permissions do you have? You need at least view only on the site configuration containers on the 5.5 side. Missy - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:11 PM Subject: Joining Site Trying to run /forestprep and when I goto join an existing 5.5 site, it asks me for a server name from the 5.5 Site, and when I enter it it comes back with an error stating I don't have the permissions required to complete the operation. Has anyone come accross this, or able to lend a helping hand. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
What type of position would be a grade 28? Brian -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Our policy here is that even though we are exempt, we still get compensated...up to a certain pay grade. We are exempt, but still have an hourly rate for the purposes of OT. Our exempt ranks start with a Grade 21 and go to something like a Grade 32(this would be like the VP of the entire global company). Grades 21-24 are paid anything over 40 hours/week at 1.5x your hourly rate. Grades 25-27 are paid OT at regular hourly rates, for anything over 40 hours. Grades 28 and above just donate all extra time to the company. However, Grades 25 and up have the ability to come in for 1/2 a day and claim a full days wages...just because they are expected to work more flexible hours, I suppose. We also have Flex time, where we are allowed to flex 4 hours in our work schedule, per week. So I could take the rest of the day off at noon, if I knew I was going to come in for four hours on Saturday, or come in at noon tomorrow, if I had to stay till 8pm tonight. It all works out in the end. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:jrwaters;co.hanover.va.us] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question We have a formal Comp Time policy, it's a 1 for 1 and we can pool up to 80 hours. I have also worked in places that were not so formal, that was more of a give/take type deal. Usually unless it's 2 or more hours I'm not turning it in, it all works out after you add in lunches, leaving 10min early, getting in 10min late etc... -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to hidde DLs ?
You might want to build Address Lists that only certain users are allowed to see. That address list would then include your DL you want. - Original Message - From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: How to hidde DLs ? MSX2000+SP3 1 forest multiple W2K-AD domains (A+B+C+D)+ each domain has its own MSX2000+SP3 but due to W2K-AD they see a common GAL Is there anyway to allow a DL created in Domain A to behaves like this in the GAL: a) not viewable from other domains (only from users in domain A) b) viewable just for some users in domain A and some others in Domain B, C and D thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
http://www.networkcomputing.com/1321/1321f26.html#response Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Do you have a link to this article? Brian -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:paulc;mmcwm.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question It's funny this question has come up as I was just reading an article in Network Computing (the web site actually) dealing with comp time. For me it was an eye opener. For example, just because someone is salary does not mean they are exempt from OT pay. Another part was that comp time is not a replacement for overtime pay. If you are non-exempt, you are stilll due OT even if your employer gives you comp time. Of course, before confronting an employer you should contact the Wage and Hour divison of the Labor Department to find out for sure whether you are exempt or non-exempt. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: TWU-Durham, Ryan [mailto:Durham;txkusa.org] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Well I work Local Government (city) and I am hourly. Heres how we do ours. Comp time: If you work one hour you get 1.5 hours back in return. Comp time is used before any other time that you have (annual/sick/personal day). Comp time is easier to get approved on short notice, like if you decide at lunch that you want to take the rest of the day off and you have the comp time for it, then most likely it will not be a problem. -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Nope. You have to work an EXTRA 4 hours to fix all the problems you introduced in the first 4 hours. We are professionals you know getting paid for what we do is purely a bonus! :-) -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 15:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server
Is this for a test bed. Most times I see VMare is for testing not anything else. I have setup up Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 on a separate server as part of a network that had a VMware server handling all the DNS, DHCP and Domain controller functions. That worked fine. Sounds like too many things running causing memory, ports, etc. running for limited resources. - Original Message - From: Jackson, Cathy M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server Hi Everyone I'm trying to set up a test network using vmware on a Windows 2000 server. I've set up 2 domain controllers and several other servers, but am having problems setting up Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 virtual machine (set up as a member server in the domain). The error I'm getting is as follows: While attending to stop the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service, the following error was encountered: the requested control is not valid for this service. Microsoft Windows NT ID 0xc002041c This occurs after the files are copied to the virtual server (ie I've nearly got to the end of a normal install). After it's happened (I've tried several times!), the Exchange services services are present but not started (you can't start them manually). There's no entry in the Control panel Add remove/software to enable easy removal to allow another installation attempt, but I've tried manual removal of the exchange registry entries without success. I've also tried on another virtual machine with a clean W2K installation with the same results. The machines have 256M memory, and we're using the host-only networking configuaration. The Microsoft KB simply says they don't support this and the vmware support KB doesn't appear to have anything relevant. I seem to remember a couple of people on this list saying they used vmware, so how did you do it?! Cathy Jackson Sheffield Hallam University, UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server
Yes, this is purely for testing. There are separate vmware machines to handle the different functions, simulating the production machines. The particular virtual machine I'm having problems with is only running W2K as a member server. Cathy Jackson. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 18:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server Is this for a test bed. Most times I see VMare is for testing not anything else. I have setup up Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 on a separate server as part of a network that had a VMware server handling all the DNS, DHCP and Domain controller functions. That worked fine. Sounds like too many things running causing memory, ports, etc. running for limited resources. - Original Message - From: Jackson, Cathy M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server Hi Everyone I'm trying to set up a test network using vmware on a Windows 2000 server. I've set up 2 domain controllers and several other servers, but am having problems setting up Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 virtual machine (set up as a member server in the domain). The error I'm getting is as follows: While attending to stop the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service, the following error was encountered: the requested control is not valid for this service. Microsoft Windows NT ID 0xc002041c This occurs after the files are copied to the virtual server (ie I've nearly got to the end of a normal install). After it's happened (I've tried several times!), the Exchange services services are present but not started (you can't start them manually). There's no entry in the Control panel Add remove/software to enable easy removal to allow another installation attempt, but I've tried manual removal of the exchange registry entries without success. I've also tried on another virtual machine with a clean W2K installation with the same results. The machines have 256M memory, and we're using the host-only networking configuaration. The Microsoft KB simply says they don't support this and the vmware support KB doesn't appear to have anything relevant. I seem to remember a couple of people on this list saying they used vmware, so how did you do it?! Cathy Jackson Sheffield Hallam University, UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
I believe our local CIO is a grade 28. -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question What type of position would be a grade 28? Brian -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Our policy here is that even though we are exempt, we still get compensated...up to a certain pay grade. We are exempt, but still have an hourly rate for the purposes of OT. Our exempt ranks start with a Grade 21 and go to something like a Grade 32(this would be like the VP of the entire global company). Grades 21-24 are paid anything over 40 hours/week at 1.5x your hourly rate. Grades 25-27 are paid OT at regular hourly rates, for anything over 40 hours. Grades 28 and above just donate all extra time to the company. However, Grades 25 and up have the ability to come in for 1/2 a day and claim a full days wages...just because they are expected to work more flexible hours, I suppose. We also have Flex time, where we are allowed to flex 4 hours in our work schedule, per week. So I could take the rest of the day off at noon, if I knew I was going to come in for four hours on Saturday, or come in at noon tomorrow, if I had to stay till 8pm tonight. It all works out in the end. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:jrwaters;co.hanover.va.us] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question We have a formal Comp Time policy, it's a 1 for 1 and we can pool up to 80 hours. I have also worked in places that were not so formal, that was more of a give/take type deal. Usually unless it's 2 or more hours I'm not turning it in, it all works out after you add in lunches, leaving 10min early, getting in 10min late etc... -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server
Cathy, I have many time installed Exchange 5.5 on a VM. I have always used the bridged network setting though. This might be the issue you are having. -Original Message- From: Jackson, Cathy M [mailto:C.M.Jackson;shu.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server Yes, this is purely for testing. There are separate vmware machines to handle the different functions, simulating the production machines. The particular virtual machine I'm having problems with is only running W2K as a member server. Cathy Jackson. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: 28 October 2002 18:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server Is this for a test bed. Most times I see VMare is for testing not anything else. I have setup up Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 on a separate server as part of a network that had a VMware server handling all the DNS, DHCP and Domain controller functions. That worked fine. Sounds like too many things running causing memory, ports, etc. running for limited resources. - Original Message - From: Jackson, Cathy M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:36 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 on vmware server Hi Everyone I'm trying to set up a test network using vmware on a Windows 2000 server. I've set up 2 domain controllers and several other servers, but am having problems setting up Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 virtual machine (set up as a member server in the domain). The error I'm getting is as follows: While attending to stop the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service, the following error was encountered: the requested control is not valid for this service. Microsoft Windows NT ID 0xc002041c This occurs after the files are copied to the virtual server (ie I've nearly got to the end of a normal install). After it's happened (I've tried several times!), the Exchange services services are present but not started (you can't start them manually). There's no entry in the Control panel Add remove/software to enable easy removal to allow another installation attempt, but I've tried manual removal of the exchange registry entries without success. I've also tried on another virtual machine with a clean W2K installation with the same results. The machines have 256M memory, and we're using the host-only networking configuaration. The Microsoft KB simply says they don't support this and the vmware support KB doesn't appear to have anything relevant. I seem to remember a couple of people on this list saying they used vmware, so how did you do it?! Cathy Jackson Sheffield Hallam University, UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format
Graham Thanks. When you send the fax to the custom recipient is the fax address external to exchange and was the mail sent from outside the exchange environment? We need an automated process that will fax to various vendors but the names should be pretty static. Thanks for your recommendation but my objective is to try and work with the product that we have and minimise hardware and software. Regards -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:graham.walsh;telinet.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 16:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Marc I am running Ex 5.5 with ZetaFax and I have just created a custom recipient with a ZetaFax address and it will send it to the fax server to be converted and then faxed. The address appears in GAL. With ZetaFax, it installs virtual printers (which are spool files). When you print to the printer, it creates a file and then pops up the sender details. This then sends through the ZetaFax server. Obviously this would require some manual input but you want it automated. The other downside is that ZetaFax is only for Windows and not Unit. Is the address it is sent to always the same or does it change each time?? I have searched google and come up with ActiveFax http://www.actfax.com/. Their product supports Unix printing. I have not used the product before, but you could contact them and see if the programme can automate faxes. Regards Graham Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDI: 020 7642 4021 ZetaFax: 020 7642 4071 Switchboard: 020 7771 7700 Main Fax: 020 7771 7799 -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Graham We use Exchange 2000 (sorry Should have mentioned this) and I did try using a contact with an smtp address but this was not successful. Sorry are you saying that you send smtp messages into exchange so that Zeetafax is able to interpret the email? Your second point sounds feasible and I have not tried it using a print spooler. What I am trying to do is send an automated fax from a unix box. So I don't know if we could send a unix print job to the fax server? How do you send your print jobs to the fax server? Regards -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:graham.walsh;telinet.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:FW: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Marc Can't you create a custom recipient with the SMTP address that translates to the FAX address?? Or do you want to fax directly to FAXserve without using Exchange? I use ZetaFax extensively and this cannot be done, it has to go through exchange if you want to use an SMTP address. Otherwise you have to print to a print spooler but this avoids exchange and SMTP. Regards Graham -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 12:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format User Group We are using FAXserve for Windows and this is integrated into exchange. So if a user wants to send a FAX within Outlook in the TO field the user will put [FAX:0207123987421] and then put in the body of the email what ever they want to fax. We would like to be able to fax using an smtp address and send a fax from outside Exchange. Can any one please tell me how you can do this. When a user sends a fax exchange sends the mail as an smtp mail from one server to another. So I am thinking why can't we use smtp? 1. We could purchase the fax/smtp gateway but this is only going to create more administration overhead (we do not want another server to look after). 2. How does Exchange interpret the fax address and know how to route it to the faxserver? 3. I feel that technically there should be no reason why I can't send an smtp mail into Exchange because the fax server is the gateway and should do the rendering. Can any one point me in the right direction or come up with any positive comments (Fax vendor has not been helpful). Regards ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List
RE: Public Folder Reporting Tool
This worked great on my small Org, but when I ran it on a larger one, it just stopped working after about 20% complete with no errors? Any ideas? Ken Hatley, MCSE Messaging Consolidation VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 Office 972.997.9261 -Original Message- From: Chris Jordan [mailto:Chris.Jordan;cmg.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Reporting Tool This is NOT a good Public Folder reporting tool - but as it gets the result in about a minute, it could be quicker than searching for a tool on the Internet... Take this code, and cut and paste it into a text file with a .VBS extension. Double click on the file. Then look in C:\Temp (or a different directory if you change the first few lines). '=StartOfCode set fso = wscript.createobject(Scripting.FileSystemObject) set folder=fso.getFolder(C:\Temp) Set OStream = fso.CreateTextFile(C:\temp\ExchangePublicFolders.txt) OStream.writeLine Public Folder Hieararchy OStream.writeLine OStream.writeLine ' mySpaces = SUB LookThroughFolder (thisFolder) mySpaces = mySpaces for each SubFolder in thisFolder OSTream.WriteLine mySpaces SubFolder.name if SubFolder.folders.count 0 then LookThroughFolder SubFolder.Folders End if next mySpaces = Left(mySpaces,len(mySpaces)-5) END SUB set OL = GetObject(,OUTLOOK.APPLICATION) set MAPI = OL.GetNamespace(MAPI) ' ' Step through all stores in your profile ' MsgBox Looking for all Public Folders . . . for each Store in MAPI.FOLDERS if Store.Name = Public Folders Then LookThroughFolder (Store.Folders) end if Next MsgBox Finished looking through the Public Folders. 'Now close the output file Set OStream = Nothing set fso = nothing set folder=nothing 'EndOfCode= -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley;bankofamerica.com] Sent: 25 October 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Reporting Tool Does anyone know of any good PF reporting tools? I would like to be able to put the hierarchy into a text file and then add things like number of sub folders and such. Maybe a way to get ftreeinf.exe to put information into a text file? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
SYMPTOM: When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up error states: ___ Security ___ (X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username]. Catastrophic failure Retry Cancel ___ There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts. Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it. -Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you doing it from the server or remotely? - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 SYMPTOM: When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up error states: ___ Security ___ (X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username]. Catastrophic failure Retry Cancel ___ There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts. Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it. -Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Viewing labels on a calendar in a Public Folder
Greetings All, We have a moderated Public Folder containing a Calendar for scheduling departmental employee vacation time. The Moderator has set up custom-defined labels such as green for Lisa and yellow for Tim etc., (it's a small department). The color coding shows up fine on the moderator's workstation in Outlook 2002, and the custom label definitions are available for everyone to choose from. However, the actual color coding/labeling is not seen by other viewers of the Calendar in the Public Folder. Is there a way to set the labels so all viewers of the public folder calendar will automatically see the colored labels? Exchange 5.5 SP3, most clients are OL 2000, or OL 2002. Thanks, Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ
Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using Front-End server in a DMZ. Here's the environment: PIX firewallDMZ that houses a Front-End Exchange SP3 serverPIX FirewallLocal LAN with Back-End Exchange SP3 server. Originally, POP3 was setup on the Back-End server and is presently functioning perfectly. In order to secure the environment, we are testing a Front-End server to offload and secure that functionality. When a POP3 account is inside the firewall or on the DMZ, there is no problem with connectivity. Unfortunately, when it is on the Internet, email times out with the following error: The connection to the server has failed. Account ACCOUNT, Server: SERVER, Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure(SSL); NO, Socket Error: 10061, error Number 0x800CCCoE We have disabled Anonymous logon and are using Windows Authentication for POP3 clients on the Exchange server(s). We cannot seem to find why it works from the inside and not from the outside. We've been using a number of different documents for reference, including: Q278339 - TCP/UDP Ports Used By Exchange 2000 Server Q278339 - Exchange 2000 Windows 2000 Connectivity Through Firewalls Exchange 2000 Deployment Guide (Chapter 6) E2KFrontBack.doc but cannot find a definitive answer. Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot why POP3 is not working for the machines on the Internet? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ
Do you have the ports open? -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:jdubyn;optonline.net] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using Front-End server in a DMZ. Here's the environment: PIX firewallDMZ that houses a Front-End Exchange SP3 serverPIX FirewallLocal LAN with Back-End Exchange SP3 server. Originally, POP3 was setup on the Back-End server and is presently functioning perfectly. In order to secure the environment, we are testing a Front-End server to offload and secure that functionality. When a POP3 account is inside the firewall or on the DMZ, there is no problem with connectivity. Unfortunately, when it is on the Internet, email times out with the following error: The connection to the server has failed. Account ACCOUNT, Server: SERVER, Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure(SSL); NO, Socket Error: 10061, error Number 0x800CCCoE We have disabled Anonymous logon and are using Windows Authentication for POP3 clients on the Exchange server(s). We cannot seem to find why it works from the inside and not from the outside. We've been using a number of different documents for reference, including: Q278339 - TCP/UDP Ports Used By Exchange 2000 Server Q278339 - Exchange 2000 Windows 2000 Connectivity Through Firewalls Exchange 2000 Deployment Guide (Chapter 6) E2KFrontBack.doc but cannot find a definitive answer. Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot why POP3 is not working for the machines on the Internet? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
User Properties - Exchange Advanced - Mailbox Rights - Add Account (NT4 domain account) - Set account as Assoc External, FMA, Read. After all that, when they (admins) click Ok, it gives the below popup. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:29 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you doing it from the server or remotely? - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 SYMPTOM: When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up error states: ___ Security ___ (X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username]. Catastrophic failure Retry Cancel ___ There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts. Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it. -Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
Are you connected to a GC? I have seen that when making that change against a DC in a multi domain envirnment. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 User Properties - Exchange Advanced - Mailbox Rights - Add Account (NT4 domain account) - Set account as Assoc External, FMA, Read. After all that, when they (admins) click Ok, it gives the below popup. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:29 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you doing it from the server or remotely? - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 SYMPTOM: When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up error states: ___ Security ___ (X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username]. Catastrophic failure Retry Cancel ___ There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts. Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it. -Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q191687; Looks like you had better check your PIX rules. Can you telnet to port 25 from the outside of the DMZ..? John -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:jdubyn;optonline.net] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using Front-End server in a DMZ. Here's the environment: PIX firewallDMZ that houses a Front-End Exchange SP3 serverPIX FirewallLocal LAN with Back-End Exchange SP3 server. Originally, POP3 was setup on the Back-End server and is presently functioning perfectly. In order to secure the environment, we are testing a Front-End server to offload and secure that functionality. When a POP3 account is inside the firewall or on the DMZ, there is no problem with connectivity. Unfortunately, when it is on the Internet, email times out with the following error: The connection to the server has failed. Account ACCOUNT, Server: SERVER, Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure(SSL); NO, Socket Error: 10061, error Number 0x800CCCoE We have disabled Anonymous logon and are using Windows Authentication for POP3 clients on the Exchange server(s). We cannot seem to find why it works from the inside and not from the outside. We've been using a number of different documents for reference, including: Q278339 - TCP/UDP Ports Used By Exchange 2000 Server Q278339 - Exchange 2000 Windows 2000 Connectivity Through Firewalls Exchange 2000 Deployment Guide (Chapter 6) E2KFrontBack.doc but cannot find a definitive answer. Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot why POP3 is not working for the machines on the Internet? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Do you have to work a lot of weekends? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
What? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
Is the RUS in place for the NT4.0 domain? - Original Message - From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Are you connected to a GC? I have seen that when making that change against a DC in a multi domain envirnment. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 User Properties - Exchange Advanced - Mailbox Rights - Add Account (NT4 domain account) - Set account as Assoc External, FMA, Read. After all that, when they (admins) click Ok, it gives the below popup. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:29 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you doing it from the server or remotely? - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 SYMPTOM: When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up error states: ___ Security ___ (X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username]. Catastrophic failure Retry Cancel ___ There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts. Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it. -Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
I know, is incredibly helpful, isn't he... -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:esojka;NBME.org] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 What? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Are you kiding me. All those kids that show up to buy the latest issue of 2600. You bet they are scewing up the public kiosks! -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Do you have to work a lot of weekends? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
2600 is the greatest magazine ever -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of King, John Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Are you kiding me. All those kids that show up to buy the latest issue of 2600. You bet they are scewing up the public kiosks! -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Do you have to work a lot of weekends? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
And Schlitz is the best beer ever.. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question 2600 is the greatest magazine ever -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of King, John Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Are you kiding me. All those kids that show up to buy the latest issue of 2600. You bet they are scewing up the public kiosks! -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Do you have to work a lot of weekends? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
But.. Does your salary make up for the extra time worked? Do your annual increases take into account the additional time you put in? Brian -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Crest is the greatest beer ever but that's another discussion -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question And Schlitz is the best beer ever.. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question 2600 is the greatest magazine ever -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of King, John Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Are you kiding me. All those kids that show up to buy the latest issue of 2600. You bet they are scewing up the public kiosks! -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Do you have to work a lot of weekends? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Breakfast of Champions! -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question And Schlitz is the best beer ever.. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question 2600 is the greatest magazine ever -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of King, John Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Are you kiding me. All those kids that show up to buy the latest issue of 2600. You bet they are scewing up the public kiosks! -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Do you have to work a lot of weekends? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
He posted this questions to multiple lists. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 What? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Same here. They made a large portion of the company hourly and then less than a year later, they are restrict the OT. They wanted to pull the comp time with us, but the Commonwealth said, No, no, no, that OT is OT -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Large corp. Hourly - restricted overtime. No more than 1 hour per week per employee (no joke). Salary, no comp time, no overtime. However, if I am here til 2am, I don't actually get in trouble for showing up at 10 the next day. But that's up to my boss. Weekends? Sucks to be me. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:Tom.Meunier;courts.state.tx.us] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:33 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the state gummint, that's what I get. In private business, I'd work an 80 hour week and get, Too bad, so sad, you're salaried. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:bobs;LEAWOOD.ORG] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Comp Time Question Subject: RE: Comp Time Question Here at the City and being Salary, my boss allows me to take a 1 to 1 ratio for time I work over 40 hours :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax:401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Comp Time Question
Here I'm on salary and don't get any extra money for time worked outside normal business hours, but it does buy me a lot of flexibility with my schedule. If I stay late working on something they don't give me grief if I sleep in the next day and come in a couple hours late; or leave early. Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Comp Time Question Does anyone know if there is a standard policy out there for Comp Time? I have been asked to find out what other companies do to compensate their employees For working off hours(nights, weekends), beyond their normal workweek. Example: If I have to come in on a Saturday to install a new antivirus package and it take 4 hours, do I get 4 hours off during the week or what? Thanks - Brian Brian Dugas MIS Director Summit Technical Services, Inc. Ph: 401-736-8323 ext. 11 Fax: 401-738-9813 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.summit-technical.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Installation
During the installation of my domains first Exchange 2000 server I receive numerous events with event ID 9177 in event viewer: The description for Event ID 9177 in Source (MSExchangeAdmin) cannot be found. The lcoal computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: CN=**, LDAP://PLATINUM/CN=COA,cn=DisplaySpecifiers, CN=Configuration,DC=Spectore, DC=com, The directory service is unavailable. Don't know what this means. Please help. Jonathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
And you care about this because As long as the question is on-topic for the lists, I see no issue. If he wants to go through the pain of monitoring all of them, so be it. Pick which list you're going to provide an answer on and ignore the rest. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 He posted this questions to multiple lists. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 What? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
Fact, not fiction.. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 And you care about this because As long as the question is on-topic for the lists, I see no issue. If he wants to go through the pain of monitoring all of them, so be it. Pick which list you're going to provide an answer on and ignore the rest. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 He posted this questions to multiple lists. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 What? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
Hello Mike, Monday, October 28, 2002, 4:50:08 PM, you wrote: HM Fact, not fiction.. HM -Original Message- HM From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com] HM Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:56 PM HM To: Exchange Discussions HM Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 HM And you care about this because As long as the question is on-topic for the lists, I see no issue. If he wants to go through the pain of monitoring all of them, so be it. HM Pick which list you're going to provide an answer on and ignore the rest. HM -Original Message- HM From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] HM Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:40 PM HM To: Exchange Discussions HM Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 HM He posted this questions to multiple lists. HM -Original Message- HM From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] HM [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka HM Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 16:22 HM To: Exchange Discussions HM Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 HM What? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Try not to cross post -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Frédéric Médery Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 09:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HM _ HM List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm HM Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp HM To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com HM Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HM _ HM List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm HM Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp HM To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com HM Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HM === HM This email and its contents are confidential. If you HM are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose HM or use the information within this email or its HM attachments. If you have received this email in error, HM please delete it immediately. Thank you. === HM _ HM List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm HM Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp HM To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com HM Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] HM _ HM List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm HM Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp HM To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com HM Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for all the usefull answers ! :-( I'm out of here -- Best regards, Frédéricmailto:fmedery;videotron.ca _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange
Mail blasts
We presently use an external source for sending out a mail blast to 22000 subscibers to our e-newsletter. Is there any reason why I shouldn't consider to do this via our Exchange server ? The emails go out in various formats to cater to different email clients - for instance, in HTML, and plain text format. We are running Exchange 5.5 - SP4. Are there people out there who do this on an Exchange server and what is the overall experience. Would like some feedback. Thanks RB _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 Installation
Maybe if you told us the exact steps you took for this install and what your infrastructure is. - Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:45 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 Installation During the installation of my domains first Exchange 2000 server I receive numerous events with event ID 9177 in event viewer: The description for Event ID 9177 in Source (MSExchangeAdmin) cannot be found. The lcoal computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following information is part of the event: CN=**, LDAP://PLATINUM/CN=COA,cn=DisplaySpecifiers, CN=Configuration,DC=Spectore, DC=com, The directory service is unavailable. Don't know what this means. Please help. Jonathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail blasts
You like to pay more for it? The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)? You don't want to deal with reply traffic? Your link to your ISP is via a 300 baud acoustic modem? -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail blasts We presently use an external source for sending out a mail blast to 22000 subscibers to our e-newsletter. Is there any reason why I shouldn't consider to do this via our Exchange server ? The emails go out in various formats to cater to different email clients - for instance, in HTML, and plain text format. We are running Exchange 5.5 - SP4. Are there people out there who do this on an Exchange server and what is the overall experience. Would like some feedback. Thanks RB _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox manager
In E2KSP3, what is the executable that Mailbox Manager actually runs? I've gone thru all the MS Q articles I can find, slipstick.com, as well as other sites and can't find what the actual .exe file is. I'm still trying to track down the source of extra instances of the manager running. Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mail blasts
Your IT department got suckered into a deal with ironclad clauses, so since you have to pay for it anyway, you might as well use it? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-274642;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail blasts You like to pay more for it? The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)? You don't want to deal with reply traffic? Your link to your ISP is via a 300 baud acoustic modem? -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail blasts We presently use an external source for sending out a mail blast to 22000 subscibers to our e-newsletter. Is there any reason why I shouldn't consider to do this via our Exchange server ? The emails go out in various formats to cater to different email clients - for instance, in HTML, and plain text format. We are running Exchange 5.5 - SP4. Are there people out there who do this on an Exchange server and what is the overall experience. Would like some feedback. Thanks RB _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
My opinion: this is one of those white-board type questions. 3 free cents: As a high-level process I'd work my way through this issue figuring out what I could rely on based on how things were working before any changes, and at what incremental point during the changes did things begin to break. If you can't easily map that out on a timeline, then you may be in for an expensive resolution. Hope that helps some :) - okay, back under rock -Original Message- From: Frédéric Médery [mailto:fmedery;videotron.ca] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN breaks Outlook
Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN breaks Outlook
Try lowering the mtu on the linksys or the alcatel. Search google for details. -Original Message- From: JPC [mailto:jpciocon;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VPN breaks Outlook Hi, folks: Mixed mode, currently migrating users from 5.5 to E2k. Remote users have Outlook 2002 on W2k Professional laptops and Alcatel PERMIT/Client. These users connect via dial-up, they can access their mailboxes and send/receive no problem. When they use LinkSys router and DSL, they can access our network, the internet and other network resources EXCEPT for their mailboxes on the E2k server. Synchronization failure messages are related to network problems preventing access to the Exchange server or the RPC message box retrieving data from Exchange server. These eventually fail and nothing is exchanged between the client and their server mailbox. Has anyone seen this? If so, what tips would you suggest? Thanks very much. -Juancho _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000
I ran across this last week and it may apply to your situation: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q321543 One thing that is not clear is what exactly you mean by AD processes and Exchange is very slow'slow delivery (exchange), slow to replicate changes (AD), system is slow (processor)?? The symptoms described in the article you have included in your post should not affect system (processor) performance. Message delivery and replication could be affected though. -Original Message- From: Frédéric Médery [mailto:fmedery;videotron.ca] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: impact of the Q262376 on Exchange 2000 Hello Everybody, TOPOLOGY : 1 Exchange 2000 SP3 + AD 1 Serveur AD (First DC), upgraded from NT4 PROBLEM : We upgraded from NT4 to Windows 2000 Active directory several months ago. Since then we installed a second DC with Exchange 2k. All servers are Ghz servers with Go of RAM. Exchange DB and Logs are on a SANS. From the begin, all the AD processes are very very slow and Exchange is also very slow. I checked my servers and we have the error describe in the KB (Computer Name Does Not Match the Windows 2000 Domain Name After Upgrade) : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q262376 Do you know the impact on Exch2k ? could it be the source of my problem Thanks, F _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox manager
It runs as part of the System Attendant. Have you gone mad.exe? http://support.microsoft.com/view/tn.asp?kb=305951 William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox manager In E2KSP3, what is the executable that Mailbox Manager actually runs? I've gone thru all the MS Q articles I can find, slipstick.com, as well as other sites and can't find what the actual .exe file is. I'm still trying to track down the source of extra instances of the manager running. Thanks, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ
Send me the pix config byron -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:jdubyn;optonline.net] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Troubleshooting POP3 Access to a Front-End server in a DMZ Having trouble getting POP3 access to work using Front-End server in a DMZ. Here's the environment: PIX firewallDMZ that houses a Front-End Exchange SP3 serverPIX FirewallLocal LAN with Back-End Exchange SP3 server. Originally, POP3 was setup on the Back-End server and is presently functioning perfectly. In order to secure the environment, we are testing a Front-End server to offload and secure that functionality. When a POP3 account is inside the firewall or on the DMZ, there is no problem with connectivity. Unfortunately, when it is on the Internet, email times out with the following error: The connection to the server has failed. Account ACCOUNT, Server: SERVER, Protocol:SMTP, Port 25, Secure(SSL); NO, Socket Error: 10061, error Number 0x800CCCoE We have disabled Anonymous logon and are using Windows Authentication for POP3 clients on the Exchange server(s). We cannot seem to find why it works from the inside and not from the outside. We've been using a number of different documents for reference, including: Q278339 - TCP/UDP Ports Used By Exchange 2000 Server Q278339 - Exchange 2000 Windows 2000 Connectivity Through Firewalls Exchange 2000 Deployment Guide (Chapter 6) E2KFrontBack.doc but cannot find a definitive answer. Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot why POP3 is not working for the machines on the Internet? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
Yes, we are, and no, it's a single domain. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:11 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Are you connected to a GC? I have seen that when making that change against a DC in a multi domain envirnment. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 User Properties - Exchange Advanced - Mailbox Rights - Add Account (NT4 domain account) - Set account as Assoc External, FMA, Read. After all that, when they (admins) click Ok, it gives the below popup. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:29 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you doing it from the server or remotely? - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 SYMPTOM: When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up error states: ___ Security ___ (X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username]. Catastrophic failure Retry Cancel ___ There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts. Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it. -Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
yep. Let me state that this was only a problem after applying SP3. Everything was fine until then. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Is the RUS in place for the NT4.0 domain? - Original Message - From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Are you connected to a GC? I have seen that when making that change against a DC in a multi domain envirnment. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 User Properties - Exchange Advanced - Mailbox Rights - Add Account (NT4 domain account) - Set account as Assoc External, FMA, Read. After all that, when they (admins) click Ok, it gives the below popup. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:29 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you doing it from the server or remotely? - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3 SYMPTOM: When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up error states: ___ Security ___ (X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username]. Catastrophic failure Retry Cancel ___ There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts. Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it. -Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
Did I mention that I am on hold?
The Kenny G version of I'll be there on your second trip to work...
OH BOY.
PSS gets my vote for worst hold music.
That, and I keep bouncing in and out of the queue. {
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:37 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying
Exchange SP3
yep. Let me state that this was only a problem after applying SP3.
Everything was fine until then.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying
Exchange SP3
Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying
Exchange SP3
Is the RUS in place for the NT4.0 domain?
- Original Message -
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying
Exchange
SP3
Are you connected to a GC? I have seen that when making that change
against a DC in a multi domain envirnment.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying
Exchange SP3
User Properties - Exchange Advanced - Mailbox Rights - Add Account
(NT4 domain account) - Set account as Assoc External, FMA, Read. After
all that, when they (admins) click Ok, it gives the below popup.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:29 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying
Exchange SP3
Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying
Exchange SP3
What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you
doing it from the server or remotely?
- Original Message -
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
SYMPTOM:
When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up
error states: ___
Security ___
(X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username].
Catastrophic failure
Retry Cancel
___
There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have
admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts.
Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are
two, they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well
it's not even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post
more info about them as I get it if anyone needs it.
-Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchang e SP3
Mmmm bouncing in and out
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
Did I mention that I am on hold?
The Kenny G version of I'll be there on your second trip to work...
OH BOY.
PSS gets my vote for worst hold music.
That, and I keep bouncing in and out of the queue. {
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT)
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:37 PM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
yep. Let me state that this was only a problem after applying SP3.
Everything was fine until then.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:23 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
Is the RUS in place for the NT4.0 domain?
- Original Message -
From: Hutchins, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
Are you connected to a GC? I have seen that when making that change against
a DC in a multi domain envirnment.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
User Properties - Exchange Advanced - Mailbox Rights - Add Account (NT4
domain account) - Set account as Assoc External, FMA, Read. After all
that, when they (admins) click Ok, it gives the below popup.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com]
Posted At: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:29 PM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
Subject: Re: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange
SP3
What exactly are you trying to change that gives you that error? Are you
doing it from the server or remotely?
- Original Message -
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:09 PM
Subject: Hotfix available for Security problems after applying Exchange SP3
SYMPTOM:
When modifying Exchange Advanced permissions, completely useless pop-up
error states: ___
Security ___
(X) Unable to save permission changes on [Username].
Catastrophic failure
Retry Cancel ___
There were no associated event log messages. This happens if you have
admins (beasts of burden) without domain admin who change user accounts.
Microsoft will send you patches, which are not public yet. There are two,
they go hand in hand (one is a CDO store fix, the other... well it's not
even released yet, I'll have more info later...). I will post more info
about them as I get it if anyone needs it.
-Ali-locked-in-PSS-hell
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ:
RE: Exch 2K and Exch 5.5 merge
There's no supported way to do what you want as such. As suggested by another, you'll have to migrate the data using PSTs or Exmerge (which automates the PSTs). Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Alexey Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 2K and Exch 5.5 merge Hi, There is an Exchange 2000 org running in native mode. There is also a separate Exch 5.5 org. Is it possible to migrate Exch 5.5 so it could join the existing Exch 2000 org? Only migration of 5.5 mailboxes is needed. Thanks and regards, Alexey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex2k and IIS Problem
Are you running anything else, like a virus scanner, on the machine? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Helen Best Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ex2k and IIS Problem We installed EX2k in August for our Students 2 back end servers - Ex2k with SP2 on Advanced Server with SP3 - this holds the 17000 student mailboxes - all appears to be fine here. Compaq Utilities installed on both - These are connected to a SAN. Originally 1 front end server - dual PIII processors with 1Gb RAM, EX2k SP2 with Advanced Server SP3 - this is/was for Incoming External mail (via our Sendmail server) and OWA. This server would regularly stop its IIS and Exchange Services with error code 7031 - This believes that there is a code red worm on the server - but the server has been patched from Windows Update. So a second Front end server was put in place for OWA - same build but was stable until the 1st FE was rebuilt. Everything was put through to the 2nd FE. 1st FE came up with no problems but 2nd FE then started having the same problem as the 1st before the rebuild. SMTP mail put back to 1st Server - everything was stable until 2nd FE was rebuilt - 2nd now stable but 1st no longer. The 2nd was rebuilt without the Compaq Utilities and with additional RAm - now 1.75GB 1st server also started having other problems which have all been resolved apart from the original 7031 - services termintating unexpectedly. Has anyone seen this problem, know of a fix, or can point me in the right direction Please??? Thanks in advance Helen Best Bournemouth University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: permissions in e2k
The Domain Admins group doesn't receive any Exchange permissions by default regardless of its server group membership. If you still think it's important, you can do it pretty much the same way as you used to do it, except the tool is in a different place. Right-click My Computer (or its renamed equivalent) and select Manage. Or open an MMC and add in Computer Management. It's in the Local Users and Groups part. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Beeler Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: permissions in e2k In the past, with 5.5, we used to remove the domain Admins group from the local administrators box from our Exchange servers. Since I've had some permission issues with e2k, I wanted to do the same thing with the e2k box. I just want to remove the domain admins group from the e2k server. Does anyone know if I can do this, or will it have a negative impact on e2k? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format
You create a mail-enabled contact with a primary address of type FAX (say FAX:8005551212), which will show up in the General tab, and with the SMTP address you want set in the E-Mail Addresses tab (say SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Then when your system receives a mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it'll send that message out to fax number 800-555-1212. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Graham Thanks. When you send the fax to the custom recipient is the fax address external to exchange and was the mail sent from outside the exchange environment? We need an automated process that will fax to various vendors but the names should be pretty static. Thanks for your recommendation but my objective is to try and work with the product that we have and minimise hardware and software. Regards -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:graham.walsh;telinet.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 16:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Marc I am running Ex 5.5 with ZetaFax and I have just created a custom recipient with a ZetaFax address and it will send it to the fax server to be converted and then faxed. The address appears in GAL. With ZetaFax, it installs virtual printers (which are spool files). When you print to the printer, it creates a file and then pops up the sender details. This then sends through the ZetaFax server. Obviously this would require some manual input but you want it automated. The other downside is that ZetaFax is only for Windows and not Unit. Is the address it is sent to always the same or does it change each time?? I have searched google and come up with ActiveFax http://www.actfax.com/. Their product supports Unix printing. I have not used the product before, but you could contact them and see if the programme can automate faxes. Regards Graham Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDI: 020 7642 4021 ZetaFax: 020 7642 4071 Switchboard: 020 7771 7700 Main Fax: 020 7771 7799 -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Graham We use Exchange 2000 (sorry Should have mentioned this) and I did try using a contact with an smtp address but this was not successful. Sorry are you saying that you send smtp messages into exchange so that Zeetafax is able to interpret the email? Your second point sounds feasible and I have not tried it using a print spooler. What I am trying to do is send an automated fax from a unix box. So I don't know if we could send a unix print job to the fax server? How do you send your print jobs to the fax server? Regards -Original Message- From: Graham Walsh [mailto:graham.walsh;telinet.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 13:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:FW: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format Marc Can't you create a custom recipient with the SMTP address that translates to the FAX address?? Or do you want to fax directly to FAXserve without using Exchange? I use ZetaFax extensively and this cannot be done, it has to go through exchange if you want to use an SMTP address. Otherwise you have to print to a print spooler but this avoids exchange and SMTP. Regards Graham -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns;sainsburys.co.uk] Sent: 28 October 2002 12:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Faxing - SMTP header and message body format User Group We are using FAXserve for Windows and this is integrated into exchange. So if a user wants to send a FAX within Outlook in the TO field the user will put [FAX:0207123987421] and then put in the body of the email what ever they want to fax. We would like to be able to fax using an smtp address and send a fax from outside Exchange. Can any one please tell me how you can do this. When a user sends a fax exchange sends the mail as an smtp mail from one server to another. So I am thinking why can't we use smtp? 1. We could purchase the fax/smtp gateway but this is only going to create more administration overhead (we do not want another server to look after). 2. How does Exchange interpret the fax address and know how to route it to the faxserver? 3. I feel that technically there should be no reason why I can't send an smtp mail into Exchange because the fax server is the gateway and should do the rendering. Can any one point me in the right direction or come up with any positive comments (Fax vendor has not been helpful). Regards **
