RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange
What is the cost of the client? -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Well... Ximian with the exchange connector has the advantage of being able to view/edit the calendar, tasks, etc... it's very similar in appearance to outlook. Quite a few of our Linux people use it. (it's really going through OWA to get to the additional folders (calendar, tasks)). Seems to work quit well here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Mabye I'm just a little naïve, but since Exchange supports IMAP, why not use a unix IMAP client? There are dozens of good unix IMAP clients out there (Netscape Messenger being one of them...). Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell announced that now THEY got their hands on Ximian, right? 'cause Ximian has been out and around for a while. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Novell connects Linux desktop users to Microsoft Exchange 2003 12/4/2003 http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/enterprise/2003/0312040815.asp?A=HOMEO= FPIN http://tinyurl.com/xsea Novell today announced support for Microsoft Exchange 2003 via its Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange. Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange enables users of the Ximian Evolution e-mail and workgroup information management application to easily collaborate with Windows users connected to Microsoft Exchange 2000 or 2003 servers. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Their website says they support Mandrake 9.1. Maybe Ximian have just not updated their site to include 9.2? Wasn't 9.2 only released in October? Did you ask one of their sales people? AW - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange We looked at that, but they do not support Mandrake 9.2. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Hi, You can use Ximian Evolution http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/ with their Exchange Connector http://www.ximian.com/products/connector/ for Exchange 2000 or 20003. The client is free, but the Connector will cost you. I think it costs around $25US per client. I use Evolution on my linux desktop, and it has a very Outlook-y feel. Cheers, Allison W. - Original Message - From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 4:43 AM Subject: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange Greetings! Is anyone familiar with a client that will interact with Exchange on the Unix/Linux platform (specifically Mandrake)? I am looking for the same functionality (or similar) as to Outlook. Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe:
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus received in Details.zip
Your welcome. Waiting on it myself. -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Thanks, Pete. I forgot their general search eng won't turn up viruses. One has to go to the virus enc to search. I'm surprised that 691 is still in the CPR state. Trend usually has them out of CPR within 24 hours. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip I just looked and there is 691 out there but is in test so it must be manually downloaded. I also found the virus yaya in their encyclopedia. http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_YAHA.AF -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Are u sure? Trend says 690 is the latest and a search at Trend's site shows no hits for yaha. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus received in Details.zip Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. clearing the coffee cups and empty pizza boxes Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up. The virus disables Trend AV on the client, plus it disables Regedit, Task Manager and a couple more like those utils. The pc pretty much comes to a standstill after that. We are running the latest Trend AV on our Exchange server plus the latest Office Scan on the desktops. Our pc's are pretty much up-to-date with Microsoft patches too. Trend just advised us that they are developing a new patch for this virus/variation of a virus. Plse be on the lookout for updates from your AV suppliers. Regards Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Icon's and piping username/domain/password.
Exchange 5.5 We have a new president coming into the University who has some unusual requests. She would like to have two separate icons available on her desktop which point to two separate outlook accounts which will pipe in the username/domain/password. One for herself and one for the husband. She does not want to be bothered with typing in login information. Never heard of this request before, so I thought I would post it. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Icon's and piping username/domain/password.
I've already expressed the security concerns. They want to use the full blown outlook with each of them having their own icon on the same computer to click on and automatically log them into their separate mailbox. I know...it's scary, but I'm not going to tell the new President of the University no. I feel like a little worm on a big hook (crow). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icon's and piping username/domain/password. You didn't say whether both of these accounts are regular Exchange accounts or other. If you set her up w/ Outlook Express for that, you can save the authentication in the accounts and all she would have to do is click on the 'send/receive' button. Might still have the issue of separating the mail between the two accounts though. If they are both Exchange server accounts, she can add the other mailbox to her Outlook profile and open them both at the same time. See http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/links.htm#addtobar. Oh, and that 'bother' with putting in login information, in general terms that's a security issue, though some CEOs never heard of the topic. Has something to do with why the @#$% logins and passwords are required in the first place. Sheesh. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Icon's and piping username/domain/password. Exchange 5.5 We have a new president coming into the University who has some unusual requests. She would like to have two separate icons available on her desktop which point to two separate outlook accounts which will pipe in the username/domain/password. One for herself and one for the husband. She does not want to be bothered with typing in login information. Never heard of this request before, so I thought I would post it. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches.
This may be a stupid question. We are looking into applying SP4 to our 2000 servers. If we apply SP4, will it require the re-install of any security patches that we have put into place in the last few weeks such as MDAC or any of the buffer overflow security patches we have put into place after the 2000 SP4 release? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches.
O.K., so the big ones are 823890 and 823718? I'll have to research on what others. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches. If they were released after sp4 was, yes. All SP's and hotfixes need to be installed chronologically. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 2000 SP4 upgrade and security patches. This may be a stupid question. We are looking into applying SP4 to our 2000 servers. If we apply SP4, will it require the re-install of any security patches that we have put into place in the last few weeks such as MDAC or any of the buffer overflow security patches we have put into place after the 2000 SP4 release? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG.
Exchange 5.5. We've been getting hammered by the SOBIG virus here. In the last hour both the systems that house our IMC failed on port 25 and I had to reboot. I pretty sure it's due to the flood of messages we are encountering. SOBIG count was 35,000 day before yesterday 45,000 yesterday. Any suggestions? I've talked to our firewall guy and he can't filter the notification out, so I'm looking for other options. What about increasing the number of connects on the IMC? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG.
Unfortunately no. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG. Do you have an SMTP gateway that you can use to filter out messages based on subject? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG. Exchange 5.5. We've been getting hammered by the SOBIG virus here. In the last hour both the systems that house our IMC failed on port 25 and I had to reboot. I pretty sure it's due to the flood of messages we are encountering. SOBIG count was 35,000 day before yesterday 45,000 yesterday. Any suggestions? I've talked to our firewall guy and he can't filter the notification out, so I'm looking for other options. What about increasing the number of connects on the IMC? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
We will have 4 levels shortly, using 3 different vendors. 1. Have TrendMicro on the Exchange Servers for the mailboxes. 2. Have McAfee for file scanning on the server level (saved our butts a couple of times). 3. Have McAfee on the Desktop level. 4. Soon to have Mirapoint installed as front end relays to our IMC's which uses Sophos virus scanner. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available
We recently had a problem as well. The resolution was do de-install tcpip and re-install on the workstation having the issue. Have no idea why that would fix it, but it worked in our cases. -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange (5.5) server not available I've had the same problem with a couple of my workstations herecan do nslookup to exchange server, ping, map a drive, via unc, changed rpc binding order on the workstation, can have the user move to another machine in same office works fine, move to another xp machine works fineetc, etc...ultimately had to reinstall xp. Something is going on with outlook2002 and xpthis is not the only email we've had on this problem... john -Original Message- From: Shawn Connelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange (5.5) server not available This is very strange and I'm at a complete loss as to what the problem is. As of yesterday, 3 out of 53 computers all connected the same or similar way with the same OS and Outlook client... are encountering one or more of the following problems: Server: Exchange Server 5.5 with latest patches Workstations: Windows 2000 with SP3 or 4 - all patched for Blaster worm. Outlook 2002 1. Very long delays in viewing messages at times (though quite often). The message, Requesting Data from Microsoft Exchange Server appears and requires a very long time before it completes. It's like being on a very slow MODEM connection. I have sense attempted to re-establish the client connection by removing their profile. Upon entering the client name and clicking check name, the workstation can no longer see the Exchange server at all. 2. Connecting a client (Outlook connecting to Exchange Server setting) is impossible. Typing the user name and clicking check name takes over 5 minutes before the message, Exchange Server unavailable appears or Outlook could not log on. Check to make sure you are connected to the network and are using the proper server and mailbox name. All systems can browse the Internet and also ping the MS Exchange server and telnet to port 25 on the Exchange Server from both internally and externally. I've attempted connecting to the Server's name, its specific IP address... nothing seems to work from Outlook or its client configuration program. What has happened since last Wednesday that is causing problems on only 3 of 53 workstations? I'm at a loss!! Help please! SDC _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
Scott, What was your original issue? There is an ongoing argument on GroupShield versus ScanMail at our site. Management keeps pressing to cutover to GroupShield to save money since we have a site license for the campus that includes Exchange. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange. Needless to say it's gone now. Is Scanmail still the defacto? I would like to get the best antivirus package out there. Thanks, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
Sorry if this comes in a second time. Tried posting and it didn't come through...sending as plain text this time. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on 2000 Server running OWA IIS 5.0. Have current security patches. Check version of CDO.DLL version 5.5.2655.79 CDOHTLM.DLL 5.5.2655.77 which seems to be current. Been battling with our OWA server for the last week or so. For no reason that I can determine, OWA just stops responding. It looks as if its trying to bring up the LOGON.ASP page but nothing displays and it just hangs. If you go in the services control panel and try to stop the World Wide Publishing Service it sits and eventually you get an error: 1053 service did not respond to a start or control request in a timely manner. Then if you try and kill the task manager and try and kill inetinfo.exe service you get a message: could not stop IIS Admin Service on local computer, access denied The only recourse I have is to reboot the bloody system to get it back up. I've looked at the logs and do not see anything unusual. Nothing in the event logs either. Really weird! This happened a few months back and then it suddenly cleared up. Before I call MS I though I would run it by the Exchange Listserv to see if anyone else has encountered this problem. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).
Tried that argument but unfortunately, they won't accept that as a valid reason. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). original issue = it sucks eggs - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:49 PM Subject: RE: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). Scott, What was your original issue? There is an ongoing argument on GroupShield versus ScanMail at our site. Management keeps pressing to cutover to GroupShield to save money since we have a site license for the campus that includes Exchange. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trend? (Was Exchange Services). For those of you who care, after many sleepless nights, it turns out my problem came down to good old Groupshield for Exchange. Needless to say it's gone now. Is Scanmail still the defacto? I would like to get the best antivirus package out there. Thanks, Scott. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question
Windows 2000 SP3 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question What Windows SP? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 OWA hangs, cannot stop/restart IIS question Sorry if this comes in a second time. Tried posting and it didn't come through...sending as plain text this time. Exchange 5.5 SP4 on 2000 Server running OWA IIS 5.0. Have current security patches. Check version of CDO.DLL version 5.5.2655.79 CDOHTLM.DLL 5.5.2655.77 which seems to be current. Been battling with our OWA server for the last week or so. For no reason that I can determine, OWA just stops responding. It looks as if its trying to bring up the LOGON.ASP page but nothing displays and it just hangs. If you go in the services control panel and try to stop the World Wide Publishing Service it sits and eventually you get an error: 1053 service did not respond to a start or control request in a timely manner. Then if you try and kill the task manager and try and kill inetinfo.exe service you get a message: could not stop IIS Admin Service on local computer, access denied The only recourse I have is to reboot the bloody system to get it back up. I've looked at the logs and do not see anything unusual. Nothing in the event logs either. Really weird! This happened a few months back and then it suddenly cleared up. Before I call MS I though I would run it by the Exchange Listserv to see if anyone else has encountered this problem. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical)
Don't forget about eseutil DB repair tool in the advent you hav a corruption. The repair functions processes at a given rate (can't remember how fast) so a full repair on a large database could run for half a day or more depending on the size. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes? -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnical) Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals remarkably well with huge databases. -Peter -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec hnic al) Thanks for the replies but what I am looking for is documentation to show to mamangement. Is there any type of Best Practices or any Limitations due to whatever issues that it would be recommended for an Exchange Mailbox and/or Information store not to get HUMONGOUS We are trying to enforce limits but we need some Document/White Paper that would let us know what we recommend as max size for an Information store or a Mailbox to use that as a Point of Discussion of why to enfore limits? I know that Exchange Standard is 16 Gig, On Enterprise if it can get to a terrabyte(S) or more? Why would it not be recommended (Have large I/S and mailboxbes) besides Recovery time would be slow? What other points can be brought up that are DOCUMENTED of why not to have such a large information store or Mailboxes? Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Mario -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Enterprise edition? The limit is measured in TB. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com: 80/support/kb/articles/Q240/1/52.ASPNoWebContent=1 documents this - Original Message - From: Rosales, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:33 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Technic al) Does anyone know of a Document, whether written by Microsoft or by someone else that states the How big an Exchange Information Store can get(Whether recommended or technical limitation) and what the Limit of a Mailbox Size is (Whether for technical reasons or Limitations of tools) If anyone can help out I would appreciate it. This is for Exchange 5.5 Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ:
Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender.
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587. When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it? Man that doesn't sound right to me. I spoke to Trend and they said that is how it works and it always worked that way. I recently customized the recipient notification message to contact our help desk but I didn't think that external users would get it. Anyone else run into this issue? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender.
Let me clarify a little. We have sender notification off. We have recipient on. All recipients received the message notification and not just the users on Exchange. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender. This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587. When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it? Man that doesn't sound right to me. I spoke to Trend and they said that is how it works and it always worked that way. I recently customized the recipient notification message to contact our help desk but I didn't think that external users would get it. Anyone else run into this issue? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
I appreciate all the feedback. After reviewing the posts, I guess we will have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages. I'm starting to lean toward turning the notification off. Or possibly a combination of both? Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ and then turn the notification back on when it subsides. As I re-read this, that doesn't sound good either. Time to make a decision and stick with it I guess. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender? Off topic. With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually send any virus. I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected. Kind of a catch 22. I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding notification messages to the sender. Have you disabled sender notifications or are you just living with it? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Notifications to Sender?
Running Trends ScanMail, so we don't have an option to send notifications based on virus type. Good idea though! -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? Actually, a reasonable compromise for Antigen users is to disable notifications for worm senders, which includes all the sender spoofing mass mailers, but enable notifications for virus senders, which covers the macro viruses that still turn up sporadically. -Peter -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Notifications to Sender? I appreciate all the feedback. After reviewing the posts, I guess we will have to re-evaluate the sender notification messages. I'm starting to lean toward turning the notification off. Or possibly a combination of both? Turning off when we have an outbreak of a new virus that spoofs like KLEZ and then turn the notification back on when it subsides. As I re-read this, that doesn't sound good either. Time to make a decision and stick with it I guess. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Notifications to Sender? Off topic. With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually send any virus. I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected. Kind of a catch 22. I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding notification messages to the sender. Have you disabled sender notifications or are you just living with it? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Notifications to Sender?
Off topic. With the advent of Klez and various other viruses who spoof the sender we are starting to get complaints from users who are receiving the sender notifications messages from our ScanMail virus scanner who did not actually send any virus. I know we can turn off the notification, but then users who are sending viruses will not get notified that they are infected. Kind of a catch 22. I'm curious what other administrators policies are regarding notification messages to the sender. Have you disabled sender notifications or are you just living with it? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question ??
We did something similar at the University of Cincinnati. I created a secondary SMTP address of @UC.EDU for all out users. The return address for our users is their primary SMTP address of @UCMAIL.UC.EDU. If you just create a secondary SMTP address but don't make it the return address, mail should stay on the system. -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question ?? E2k W2k sp3 I work at OSU, I am in charge of the buildings network/domain. All OSU employees get an [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. I own the domain shc.ohio-state.edu so most everyone in my building has there mail forwarded from there osu.edu address to our domain address. When one person in my domain wants to send mail to another person in my domain they sometimes type in the osu.edu domain or use there personal contacts that have the osu.edu instead using the GAL . I need all mail by someone in the domain to stay in my domain. If I set everyone's primary email address on my exchange server to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can this cause any problems? Matt Plahtinsky, MCP The Ohio State University Student Health Services _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recovery Server NT Backup.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 We have a backup recover system we built to recover mailboxes. It's running 2000 and we have been able to restore to it, but we have had two occurrences when we told NT backup to restore to the our backup system, but the back started shutting down services on the originating system and trying to restore the Dir.EDB to the originating system. I know I didn't tell it to restore the Dir but only the info store, so I'm at a loss as to why it tried to restore back to the originating. This happened one other time as well. So what I would like to do to insure this does not happen again, is to restore to the local box without it being on the wire and insure it's not going back to the originating. My problem is that even though the tape drive is on the box it will not restore if I unplug it from the wire. Do I need to get a BDC and that box on a hub and then disconnect the hub from the wire for it to restore? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
I think my wife would probably object to that. Of course if that means I would leave her alone she would probably say go for it :) -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? You wanna see my pole? :) -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
I hate to ask this having had a DLT. How long to back up the 121 GB? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? We have in of our sites 100 people and 121GB IS (one VP has 2.53 Million emails with 2.1 M of them unread since 1999 and will not allow anyone to delete them), use DLT to backup. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? About 25gbs(200 users), Using Benchmark DLT1 backup device with native Microsoft Windows 2000 backup module (NTBackup). Raj -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Pete, We have about ~55 gb or so (Exchange 2k w/3 storage groups) Using Backup Exec and a Compaq TL890 Storage Library. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox Resources and Total K column.
Exchange 5.5 SP3. Confused! We have about 3032 users on a system and the Private store is currently 65 Gig. I'm looking at the Mailbox Resources and tallied up the total K for all users and I came up with 25 gig for storage and an average of 32 gig per user. I would have thought that the total gig for all users would be larger than my DB size since there is single message occurrence. I must be missing something on this. The reason I'm wondering is that we are increasing everyone's quota on the servers and I'm trying to calculate worst case scenario for disk capacity. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox Resources and Total K column.
Well, No deleted items retention period is set. White space, the event log states that there is 1152 megabytes free space after online defragmentation. That leaves the resource information being notoriously inaccurate. This doesn't even come close to what we have allocated in the DB. 25 gig reported versus 65 gig actual. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailbox Resources and Total K column. There are some things you need to take into account: 1) Deleted items retention 2) White space - the stores grow as needed, but do not shrink. If enough data is deleted to create space it is left as white space unless you manually compact the database. 3) The resources information is notoriously inaccurate. Darcy -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox Resources and Total K column. Exchange 5.5 SP3. Confused! We have about 3032 users on a system and the Private store is currently 65 Gig. I'm looking at the Mailbox Resources and tallied up the total K for all users and I came up with 25 gig for storage and an average of 32 gig per user. I would have thought that the total gig for all users would be larger than my DB size since there is single message occurrence. I must be missing something on this. The reason I'm wondering is that we are increasing everyone's quota on the servers and I'm trying to calculate worst case scenario for disk capacity. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
Andy, Got it...looks good! -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA - http://216.87.16.88/exchange logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] with password 1234 -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Titanium OWA screenshots If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA here: http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Titanium OWA screenshots
Spell checker failed for some reason. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA - http://216.87.16.88/exchange logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] with password 1234 -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Titanium OWA screenshots If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA here: http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CDO.DLL
You might want to also look at http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b313576 which is a 5.5 Post SP4 Outlook Web Access Fix and has a new CDOHTML.DLL as well. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: CDO.DLL Are you referring to the post SP4 fix? http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3ben-us%3b289606 - Original Message - From: Reed, Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:31 PM Subject: CDO.DLL Does anyone know where I can get this new CDO.DLL? I was hoping there was a way without calling Microsoft! Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
We found out about the drivers as well. The backup was taking up to two hours for a full dump of the stores. After updating the drives, we went down to 20 minutes or so. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup onto LTO and compression question. It depends on other factors as well, the number and sizes of your tracking logs, the number of transaction logs on the server, are you indexing your message stores I'm currently backing up 164 Gbytes of data, that's a public folder store, three message stores in one storage group, tracking logs, transaction logs, indexes, etc. on one LTO-1 tape. Be advised, you may need to update the drivers on the PERC card and the SCSI card connecting the LTO tape unit in order to get decent performance out of it. The default Win2K drivers for the SCSI cards have a bug in them. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Backup onto LTO and compression question. Subject: Backup onto LTO and compression question. This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have a DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server. It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed. Does anyone know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the tape? I'm not sure how well the Exchange DB will compress. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backup onto LTO and compression question.
This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have a DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server. It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed. Does anyone know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the tape? I'm not sure how well the Exchange DB will compress. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup onto LTO and compression question.
Yes. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backup onto LTO and compression question. Does it matter? - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:41 PM Subject: Backup onto LTO and compression question. This might be somewhat of a vague question. We current have a DellPowervault LTO 110T backup tape drive on our primary Exchange Server. It will back up 100 Gig non-compressed or 200 Gig compressed. Does anyone know the maximum size an Exchange DB can be if you use compression on the tape? I'm not sure how well the Exchange DB will compress. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IIS/OWA Failing and reboot required.
Well, We finally called MS on our problem with OWA failing on our 2000 servers and having to reboot the system to get IIS restarted. Microsoft looked at the dumps and had us install the Exchange Server 5.5 Post-SP4 Outlook Web Access Fixes as stated in Q313576. The fix includes files: CDOHTML.DLL - v5.52655.77 (remember this one from Q289606, was modified again) FUMSG.ASP - v5.52655.39 GLOBAL.ASA - v5.52655.41 HTMLSNIF.DLL- v6.5.6575.0 READ.ASP- v5.5.2655.12 SAFEHTML.DLL- v6.5.6575.0 Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IIS/OWA failing?
Actually, I just rebuilt a new 2000 server and it also experienced the problem. Just brought it on-line a couple of days ago with 2000 SP3. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IIS/OWA failing? I ran across this about 4 years ago. The solution was to uninstall OWA, reinstall OWA, then re apply the SP. Not sure if this would work for you but OWA on 5.5 sometimes would act strangely for no reason and this is what a call to MS did back then. I do remember after upgrading the hardware it went away, but that also included a complete rebuild of the server too. - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:00 PM Subject: IIS/OWA failing? Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 and 2000. We've been having problems with our Outlook Web Access and IIS failing. I have 3 systems now that are periodically failing. One is running NT 4.0 sp6a, and I can stop/restart the services and users still cannot get in. I have to reboot to get OWA to start and accept queries again. I do get an event 115 stating the service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code message. On two other systems with Windows 2000 SP3 and fully patched, the IIS just stops for no apparent reason and the IIS Admin Service restarts IIS using the iisreset.exe. I kind of recall someone stating that there may be a security patch that may have induced some problems to IIS/OWA? I also have the CDO patch q289606 installed and I also have McAfee excluding all Exchange directories as well as the c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv directories on the systems. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: removal of secondary SMTP address
Ed, That worked great! I looked all over for a way to clear out the field in TechNet and couldn't find it. Now that I search for ~DEL I find dozens of hits of course. Thanks again! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: removal of secondary SMTP address You import a ~DEL in the field (without the quotes) and then, in the next line if you want to, add back the addresses you want. You make it the reply address by importing it into the E-Mail Addresses field. Caution: If you do that, the old reply address will NOT become a proxy address; you must add it as a proxy as well. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: removal of secondary SMTP address I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see it come through and I checked the archives. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We are starting to experiment putting in a secondary SMTP address for selected users ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I can add a secondary smtp address using the Secondary-Proxy-Addresses field in a CSV. But for the life of me I can't figure out how to clear it if I need to. Also, I can't figure out how to easily make it the reply address unless I modify the entire Proxy-Addresses field in the CSV. Is my only option writing a script file. I've written some VB code for other items I could not perform in a CSV as well. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
removal of secondary SMTP address
I apologize if this got posted before. I didn't see it come through and I checked the archives. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We are starting to experiment putting in a secondary SMTP address for selected users ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I can add a secondary smtp address using the Secondary-Proxy-Addresses field in a CSV. But for the life of me I can't figure out how to clear it if I need to. Also, I can't figure out how to easily make it the reply address unless I modify the entire Proxy-Addresses field in the CSV. Is my only option writing a script file. I've written some VB code for other items I could not perform in a CSV as well. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Port blocking SMTP X.400
We're in the process of locking down ports for our Exchange 5.5 deployment. I've read the FAQ's and found ports required, but have a couple of questions. If you have a Exchange Server with no IMC on it just mailboxes do you need TCP 25 SMTP enabled. I would think it should only be enabled for the servers with the IMC on it not on servers that only have mailboxes. X.400 TCP 102, Is this really required for Exchange Servers and if so what is it used for. Looking at TechNet, its used by older messaging systems? For PDC and BDC's with no Exchange. What ports do I need for those guys since they only perform authentification. Would that be TCP 137 139? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Port blocking SMTP X.400
Thanks this is good information as I learn little by little. Our IMC is on it's own separate box, so that would require port 25. The systems that house our users do not have a IMC's but pass mail to the dedicated IMC's, so they don't need port 25. X.400...since it's used internally by 5.5, sounds as if I need it on all the Exchange systems. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Port blocking SMTP X.400 Without knowing exactly how you are configured, it is difficult to provide meaningful recommendations, but I'll give it a shot. In Exchange 5.5 if you do not have an IMC set up on it, then you should not need port 25. Same thing with X.400. If you are not running any X.400 connectors, then you should not need it. However, be a little careful here since Exchange 5.5, internally is X.400 based (Exchange 2000 internally is SMTP based) Those ports sound correct for the PDC and BDC, but I did not check to make absolutely certain. And again, without knowing your configuration and what you are trying to do with these systems, it is very difficult to provide any concrete advice. We're in the process of locking down ports for our Exchange 5.5 deployment. I've read the FAQ's and found ports required, but have a couple of questions. If you have a Exchange Server with no IMC on it just mailboxes do you need TCP 25 SMTP enabled. I would think it should only be enabled for the servers with the IMC on it not on servers that only have mailboxes. X.400 TCP 102, Is this really required for Exchange Servers and if so what is it used for. Looking at TechNet, its used by older messaging systems? For PDC and BDC's with no Exchange. What ports do I need for those guys since they only perform authentification. Would that be TCP 137 139? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
We're using current backups performed on 2000 SP3. Both systems running the same which has really got me puzzled why it will not read on the recovery box. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore. After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers and I don't know if it's related, but I remember some issue with Exchange 2000 Service Pack 3 changing ntbackup and earlier backups will no longer be recognized. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
Somewhat off topic. We recently upgraded our servers to Windows 2000 server with SP3 running Exchange 5.5 SP5. The systems have DLT 7000's attached to them and I have a recovery server that I use for restoration that also has a DLT 7000. After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers and they are the same. Rebuilt the system twice now no luck. I'm using an Adaptec driver and I lowered the speed to 20 and that didn't do it. I verified both systems are at the same service pack. My test box is pretty old, but it worked with NT. I took the tapes back over to the production box, and it see's them fine. If I take some older tapes and put them in, the DLT 7000 at least recognizes that there is old tape and allows me to format them. Any ideas would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Locking of Exchange ports question.
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 2000. We are finally going to be moving our Exchange deployment into a safe zone. The servers will be put into it's own secure segment that will have a firewall for internal and external users. We are requiring users to use a VPN client if they are coming in from an ISP, but we also want to try and safeguard the systems internally from the students as well, such as the dorms. Anyhow, we're looking at locking down all the ports on the Exchange Servers as well and only open ports that are required. I know I'll have to assign static ports for the MSEXCHANEDS, IS and SA TCPIP as defined Q148732. It recommends using ports above 5000, so I was going to use 5001, 5002 and 5003 and I presume that a reboot will be required. The one item which cannot be locked down is the push notification messages and UDP ports 1024-65535. I talked to our firewall expert and asked if those ports can be blocked from coming in but not for going out. Does this make sense or is there another way of securing those ports a little better. Anyone have any other advice prior to us cutting over. Any gotchas I need to be aware of? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MovieWorld Virus?
I've seen a number of the MovieWorld viruses being caught by McAfee but Trend doesn't seem to see it. Is it another name under Trend? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RAV Antivirus products
Wow! Just looked at pricing. We have a student mail system with 45,000 users which we have no virus scanning software on because it's cost prohibitive. It's Linux with SMTP so I think I'll look at this for that system. I might even look at this for our front end IMC's on Exchange as well for content filtering and keep ScanMail on the Exchange servers. Scanning software is really eating a chunk out of our budget. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RAV Antivirus products I have been told about an anti virus product called RAV. They have a lot of different mail server products (incl. Exch5.5 and 2K) as well as desktop products etc, and I have been told that they are very good. The pricing is unbelievably low compared with the big names. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with it. Jeff Hague Network Manager Randolph-Macon College [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMC as relay system (off topic)
Exchange 5.5 SP4. Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information. Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked to look at alternative replacement systems. The system is processing about 40,000 inbound messages a day. I really like the Exchange IMC since it's menu driven and I have monitors in place that can page when something happens. Also it does some validation work, such as SMTP address already used and so forth. Couple of questions. 1) Is anyone else shoving 40,000+ inbound messages through an IMC? We would have a dedicated box for this function in the existing site and would only be used for inbound messages destined for @UC.EDU. It would also route messages to other e-mail systems such as our student POP/Unix based messaging system for those users whos alias points to an alternate system. 2) Is there some other 3rd party product that is user friendly (versus text updates) that might be a good replacement that anyone might want to recommend? 3) We could go with a Linux system with an SMTP mailer. We do have a administrator on staff here that runs the POP system and a Linux deployment was mention. I don't like the fact that its line based and additions are not immediate and require recompiling (maybe don't have that term right). Thanks! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
Isn't under my control. Each college has their own policies. -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 10:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Why would your users be running Blackice on the desktop? Or do they all have their own internet connection? -- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 20 September 2002 14:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server.
UDP ports 1923, 1068, 1087. Looks as if it might be random ports. We don't have DNS service enabled on the 2000 server. -Original Message- From: Mikko Pludra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Hi, sounds like a name resolving issue to me. check the blackice logs whether the traffic originates from UDP 53. My guess is that you have DNS running on your Windows2000 server, which you hadn't under NT. What's the point of running PFs in the net if you have a firewall protecting your network? are your users afraid of internal attacks? regards, Mikko Pludra -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: UDP port probe after moving mailboxes to new 5.5 Server. Exchange 5.5 SP4 We just installed a new Exchange 5.5 server under Windows 2000 and are moving mailboxes onto the new system. I've had a few users who are running blackice on the desktop that are now stating that their accounts are receiving a UDP probe from the new mail system and they are wondering why that is occurring. I thought maybe it's something to do with new mail notification, but I don't understand why it would not have occurred on the old systems. I should state that the old server is running NT 4.0 versus 2000 for the new box. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
Sorry for having it reposted. Spent the last 3 hours getting it automated and getting the tapes ready. The only thing we could not get to work was the Eject process. This is a LTO drive and when we tried the RSM.EXE eject PF BACKUP - 1 /astart we get the following error. Changer has not IE ports. Door Access Failed. This isn't a auto-changer and an LTO doesn't have a tab to flip to eject the tape like a DLT. TechNet hasn't been much help on this one either. It's not critical that it is automatically ejected, but would help since operations would see the tape is already ejected and would not have to press that button. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. I just posted this a couple of days ago, but here it is again. It labels whatever tape is in the drive and does a backup to it. Use the GUI to create the backup selection file everything.bks. Obviously, you want this file to include your Exchange information stores. Change the BNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device to whatever the name of your tape drive is. See Q267574. This batch file needs grep, recode, and blat. Use your favorite search engine. rem * rem * rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email rem * report rem * rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002 rem * rem * Revision History rem * rem * WhenWhoWhat rem * --- rem * 06/10/2002 Ken Cornetet Original Issue rem * 06/24/2002 Ken Cornetet Added RSM command per Q267574 rem * rem * set [EMAIL PROTECTED] set SMTP=ntserver1 set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME% rem this is where NTBackup writes it's (unicode - blech) logs set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows NT\NTBackup\data c: cd \backup rem Delete any extranious log files del %LOGS%\backup*.log rem rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive rem * (See Q267574 for details) rem start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device c:\bin\sleep 30 rem rem * Do Backup rem start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J %NAME% /P DLT /N %NAME% /l:s /HC:on /UM /D %NAME% rem rem * find newest (should be only) log file rem dir /s /b /o-d %LOGS%\backup*.log c:\backup\backup.tmp set /P FILE= c:\backup\backup.tmp rem rem * Make ASCII version of log file rem c:\bin\recode -f unicode..us %FILE% log.txt rem rem * Append list of open files to the report rem echo OPEN FILES log.txt net file log.txt rem rem * Set subject for email rem set SUBJ=Backup ran OK grep -v Error: You do not have permission log1.txt findstr /i error: log1.txt if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED rem rem * Send email rem c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject %SUBJ% -server %SMTP% -f %RECIPIENT% rem rem * Move log file to our directory rem move /Y %FILE% c:\backup -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-= -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2. Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0 version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and eject and mail the logs for verification. With 2000 I used the wizard to create the backup but I can't seem to get it to grab any tape I have inserted. I tried adding multiple tapes to the media pool with the same name, but I always get The operation was not performed, no storage
NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2. Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0 version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and eject and mail the logs for verification. With 2000 I used the wizard to create the backup but I can't seem to get it to grab any tape I have inserted. I tried adding multiple tapes to the media pool with the same name, but I always get The operation was not performed, no storage media was specified message on the report. What am I missing? There must be a simple way to say any tape in there grab it and use it for a backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange.
Great. Gives me something to start with. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. No, there's no must be a simple way about it. There's not. But here's a good article that solved this problem for me, and taught me a little bit about RSM and NTBACKUP and scripting, too: http://www.jsiinc.com/sube/tip2200/rh2265.htm -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:24 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. Subject: NT 2000 backup of Exchange. Exchange 5.5 SP4 under NT 2000 SP2. Well we have our first 2000 server up running Exchange 5.5 SP3. I'm trying to get the backups to run similar to what I had with NT 4.0. With the 4.0 version I had the cmd set to initialize any tape in the drive, backup and eject and mail the logs for verification. With 2000 I used the wizard to create the backup but I can't seem to get it to grab any tape I have inserted. I tried adding multiple tapes to the media pool with the same name, but I always get The operation was not performed, no storage media was specified message on the report. What am I missing? There must be a simple way to say any tape in there grab it and use it for a backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reverse DNS and Exchange
Exchange 5.5 I'm a little confused on Reverse DNS. I kind of understand the concept that with Reverse DNS enabled the Mail from: entry must resolve to a valid domain or it will get rejected. Some I have some basic questions: I take it Exchange 5.5 does not support Reverse DNS? How about Exchange 2000? How effective is Reverse DNS to help the control of Spam? What problems/issues will we encounter if we do implement reverse DNS in some for on front end servers whatever it may be? What about users who have POP and have their return address set to be something other than their ISP but they use the ISP as the relay? When they state the Mail From: they mean the From: in the display area and not all the routes? If you have a front end relay like PMDF/VMS which relays first.last@domain to a messaging system, reverse DNS will not prevent spam to the receiving systems since it will also validate from the relay? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery
Here is one error log. However, regarding a good backup I was able to restore the information store files to its orginal location after I blew out the priv1.edb file. But still had problems mounting the information on the system manager console. Any thoughts? As far I can see right now with SBS2k there is no disaster recovery option when I load the cd it just gives me an option To reinstall or remove. Should I reinstall and then attempt another restore? Or fire up a non-production server load exchange 2000 and restore on that machine then move the mailboxes? Thanks in Advanced. Pete Using restore environment Restore log file: c:\temp\ Restore Path: c:\temp\ Annotation: Microsoft Information Store Server: DLITE2000 Backup Instance: First Storage Group Target Instance: First Storage Group Restore Instance System Path: C:\TEMP\First Storage Group Restore Instance Log Path: C:\TEMP\First Storage Group Databases: 2 database(s) Database Name: Mailbox Store (DLITE2000) GUID: BCC39792-F722-4A71-938A4A7174EAB122 Source Files: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.e db E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.stm Destination Files: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.e db E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\priv1.stm Database Name: Public Folder Store (DLITE2000) GUID: 04608456-5540-476A-53BB476A228D4B52 Source Files: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.ed b E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.stm Destination Files: E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.ed b E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\mdbdata\pub1.stm Log files range: E3D5.log - E3D5.log Last Restore Time: Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969 Recover Status: recoverEnded Recover Error: 0xC800023E Recover Time: Mon Jul 01 12:28:03 2002 Restoring Restore to server: DLITE2000 Target Instance: First Storage Group Operation terminated with error -574 (JET_errLogCorruptDuringHardRecovery, corru ption was detected during hard recovery (log was not part of a backup set)) afte r 10.62 seconds. E:\Program Files\Exchsrvr\BIN -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery Yes. How do you know you have a good backup? Is this an offline or online backup restore? What are the error messages? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery We have a good back of our mailboxes/information store using veritas 8.6. However, when trying to do a restore it fails to mount the store, however when I try to do it on the console it will not allow me to. I've read the ms knowledge base regarding doing a hard re-mount but to no avail. Is it possible to blow away the information store, then try to restore from backup. Thanks Pete _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery
Who is pss never heard of them any contact information? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Holt, Miles Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery Stop what you are going and call PSS NOW! You are in over your head and risk damaging it further. Call PSS and they can walk you through everything you will need to do to safely restore services. --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery We have a good back of our mailboxes/information store using veritas 8.6. However, when trying to do a restore it fails to mount the store, however when I try to do it on the console it will not allow me to. I've read the ms knowledge base regarding doing a hard re-mount but to no avail. Is it possible to blow away the information store, then try to restore from backup. Thanks Pete _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery
We are using backup exec exchange agent v8.6 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Holt, Miles Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery From your other comments it sounds like you are trying to restore a file backup of a in use Exchange DB. You can't do that. Were you using the exchange agent with Backup Exec? If you did not use the Exchange Agent, you almost certainly DO NOT have a valid usable backup on tape and the likelihood of recovering you server is nonexistent. Here is the PSS contact info from Microsoft's website: Paid Professional Support is available online for this product at $195 U.S. per incident, or by telephone for $245 U.S. per incident billable to your VISA, MasterCard, or American Express credit card. This includes development assistance, external database connectivity issues, or installation and configuration of server extensions on a Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 (or later) Server or Microsoft Internet Information Server. If the cause of the issue is determined to be a bug by Microsoft, the incident will not be charged. Microsoft Support Professionals are responsible for determining the nature of the bug. Professional Support contracts are also available. (800) 936-4900 IT Professionals (800) 936-5800 Developers (888) 456-5570 Partners (Resellers and Consultants) (888) 677-9444 Microsoft Certified Partners (800) 936-2197 Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) (888) 456-5570 System Builders Professional Support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including holidays. TTY users, please call (800) 892-5234. --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Pete [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery Who is pss never heard of them any contact information? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Holt, Miles Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery Stop what you are going and call PSS NOW! You are in over your head and risk damaging it further. Call PSS and they can walk you through everything you will need to do to safely restore services. --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: help with Small Biz Server 2000/Exchange 2000 recovery We have a good back of our mailboxes/information store using veritas 8.6. However, when trying to do a restore it fails to mount the store, however when I try to do it on the console it will not allow me to. I've read the ms knowledge base regarding doing a hard re-mount but to no avail. Is it possible to blow away the information store, then try to restore from backup. Thanks Pete _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto
Off topic-Mirapoint messaging solution.
This is a little off-topic. We recently went to a demonstration on Mirapoint messaging systems. We're looking at Mirapoint as a possible replacement to our aging student messaging system and potentially as front-end servers for all incoming messages to the University. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the vendor and opinions of good, bad or other. I know we could do this with Exchange, we're talking about 40,000 users and we're looking at all options and associated costs. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
APNIC Spam imitating internal users.
I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related. Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance or FW: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. The messages received seem to have all come from various APNIC sites: 203.197.145.194 - giasbm01.vsnl.net.in 203.186.145.243 - ctihk.com 203.204.70.30 - corp.giga.net.tw Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: APNIC Spam imitating internal users.
Since we are academic and we have a large number of Asians, I don't believe that is an option for us. -Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: APNIC Spam imitating internal users. I know not everyone can, but I block all Asian IP ranges. Keeps both my spam and hack attempts way down. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: APNIC Spam imitating internal users. I was wondering if anyone else is seeing some new type of Spam coming in from APNIC? This Spam is forging the return address to internal users and they all have the same subject/content, so they seem to be related. Save up to 70% on Your Current Term Life Insurance or FW: Free Term Life Insurance Quotes. Save up to 70% on your policy. The messages received seem to have all come from various APNIC sites: 203.197.145.194 - giasbm01.vsnl.net.in 203.186.145.243 - ctihk.com 203.204.70.30 - corp.giga.net.tw Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0 We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr. Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows: The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg, generated an application error The error occurred on 6/ 5/2002 @ 14:20:59.975 The exception generated was c005 at address 77f64886 (RtlAllocateHeap) We installed the following patches/hot fixes after rebuilding the entire system. The system houses not mailboxes and is only used for OWA access. sp6patch_i386 - NT 4.0 SP6a patch 128 bit Q299444i- NT 4.0 SPA Roll-up hotfix Q305929 - NT 4.0 SPA Certification patch Q319733i- IIS Rollup Hotfix for SP4 6a MS02-018 Our MAPI32.DLL is also current and I have not found any hits in Technet which apply to SP4 of Exchange. I'm debating if we should upgrade this box to Windows 2000 SP2 and IIS 5.0 and see if it stabilizes. Could someone outline the steps and hot fixes that I would have to perform to upgrade the box or am I off base on this one. Thanks in advance. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
Forgot...we also had the CDO CDOHTML hot fix installed Q289606.EXE for Exchange. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0 We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr. Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows: The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg, generated an application error The error occurred on 6/ 5/2002 @ 14:20:59.975 The exception generated was c005 at address 77f64886 (RtlAllocateHeap) We installed the following patches/hot fixes after rebuilding the entire system. The system houses not mailboxes and is only used for OWA access. sp6patch_i386 - NT 4.0 SP6a patch 128 bit Q299444i- NT 4.0 SPA Roll-up hotfix Q305929 - NT 4.0 SPA Certification patch Q319733i- IIS Rollup Hotfix for SP4 6a MS02-018 Our MAPI32.DLL is also current and I have not found any hits in Technet which apply to SP4 of Exchange. I'm debating if we should upgrade this box to Windows 2000 SP2 and IIS 5.0 and see if it stabilizes. Could someone outline the steps and hot fixes that I would have to perform to upgrade the box or am I off base on this one. Thanks in advance. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
About a week ago. Nothing else is on that box other than OWA. No mailboxes at all. The last time something like this occurred was a user was trying to open an attachment that was cleaned by the scanning software via OWA. I'm wondering if we're hitting a similar problem. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 When did this start? Is there anything else running on this box? - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0 We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr. Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows: The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg, generated an application error The error occurred on 6/ 5/2002 @ 14:20:59.975 The exception generated was c005 at address 77f64886 (RtlAllocateHeap) We installed the following patches/hot fixes after rebuilding the entire system. The system houses not mailboxes and is only used for OWA access. sp6patch_i386 - NT 4.0 SP6a patch 128 bit Q299444i - NT 4.0 SPA Roll-up hotfix Q305929 - NT 4.0 SPA Certification patch Q319733i - IIS Rollup Hotfix for SP4 6a MS02-018 Our MAPI32.DLL is also current and I have not found any hits in Technet which apply to SP4 of Exchange. I'm debating if we should upgrade this box to Windows 2000 SP2 and IIS 5.0 and see if it stabilizes. Could someone outline the steps and hot fixes that I would have to perform to upgrade the box or am I off base on this one. Thanks in advance. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097
Already have a open call with them. We're discussing going to W2k as a good step in resolving the issue. -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 I'd say wipe the box clean and start over with w2k unless you think the box is overworked, which could be the root of your problem. Looks like you have the symbols installed, so why not give pss a call? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 Forgot...we also had the CDO CDOHTML hot fix installed Q289606.EXE for Exchange. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dr Watson on INETINFO Event 4097 Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6A, IIS 4.0 We recently started encountering a problem with IIS and INETINFO Dr. Watsoning on us with Event 4097. We ended up rebuilding the entire system from scratch but we are still encountering the problem. Event as follows: The application, exe\inetinfo.dbg, generated an application error The error occurred on 6/ 5/2002 @ 14:20:59.975 The exception generated was c005 at address 77f64886 (RtlAllocateHeap) We installed the following patches/hot fixes after rebuilding the entire system. The system houses not mailboxes and is only used for OWA access. sp6patch_i386 - NT 4.0 SP6a patch 128 bit Q299444i- NT 4.0 SPA Roll-up hotfix Q305929 - NT 4.0 SPA Certification patch Q319733i- IIS Rollup Hotfix for SP4 6a MS02-018 Our MAPI32.DLL is also current and I have not found any hits in Technet which apply to SP4 of Exchange. I'm debating if we should upgrade this box to Windows 2000 SP2 and IIS 5.0 and see if it stabilizes. Could someone outline the steps and hot fixes that I would have to perform to upgrade the box or am I off base on this one. Thanks in advance. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI ???? For Exc hang e 5.5
We just cut over to the ESE version about 2 weeks ago. Was a little reluctant since the initial release of the product had some issues, but that seems to have been cleared up. We have 6,400+ users on two systems, so cutting over to the ESE version really reduced the load on the system sense we do not have the REALSCAN.EXE for every 200 mailboxes. Also, the system does not have to log into everyone's mailbox on startup, so we can now perform our audits a little easier for inactive accounts. Also the ESE gave us back the send/recipient information for virus cleaning which the AVAPI version inhibited. Overall, I would recommend the ESE versus the AVAPI/MAPI version. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI For Exc hang e 5.5 We've been pretty happy with ESE API as well. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI For Exc hang e 5.5 ESE is latest and greatest. There have been reports that AVAPI can get overloaded like MAPI, but I have not heard of one real life experience. -Original Message- From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Which is better trend with ESE API or AVAPI/MAPI For Exchang e 5.5 I have just purchased this and I was wondering which is a better choice? Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change password for Exchange in DMZ
Exchange 5.5 SP3. I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts. We can get in from our private network with no problems. The issue I'm seeing is trying to change the password of an account. We have the WINS in the private network pulling from the Wins in the DMZ. If I point to the WINS in the private which is aware of the WINS in the DMZ, I still cannot change the password. Do I have to open up a specific port for the WINS in the DMZ to the private? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ
The domain controller, Wins Server, and Exchange server are all in the DMZ. I can go over in the DMZ access the test account and I can change the password. If I go back over into the private network 10.n.n.n and get into the same account, then I cannot change the corresponding password. -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Agreed, but if he CAN authenticate the test users, then the job of locating the DC is fulfilled. There is no more ties of WINS to Password any more. I guess I wasn't clear when I made that second comment. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:04 PM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ The second question is easy - WINS is needed to find the Domain controllers so you CAN change the password -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Are you saying that your Exchange server in the DMZ are in the same domain as your corporate? Also, I am a little baffled. Since when does WINS have anything to do with Password change? Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:26 AM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Subject: Change password for Exchange in DMZ Exchange 5.5 SP3. I've been instructed to move our Exchange deployment into our DMZ. I know...I know...VPN, not my decision. We're performing a test and put a Wins and Exchange server over in the DMZ, created a few test accounts. We can get in from our private network with no problems. The issue I'm seeing is trying to change the password of an account. We have the WINS in the private network pulling from the Wins in the DMZ. If I point to the WINS in the private which is aware of the WINS in the DMZ, I still cannot change the password. Do I have to open up a specific port for the WINS in the DMZ to the private? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus
I noticed that Trends Scan Engine is now 6.1, but when I try to update from the 5.630-1025 via the console it says there are no newer versions. I sent a message to Trend inquiring on this one, but was wondering if anyone else is seeing the same issue. Possibly a manual download is require? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Trend releases a new pattern every Tues. They sometimes do more during the week, but you can always count on a Tues release. I have all my Trend SW configured to check for hourly updates. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Virus Came out today. Dear Premium Support Customer, This message is to notify you that a new pattern is now available for download. We have uploaded: Pattern 239 to - http://activeupdate-t.trendmicro.com/activeupdate/Pattern/VSAPI.zip Details about what is new in Pattern 239 is available at: - http://activeupdate-t.trendmicro.com/activeupdate/Pattern/whatsnew.txt *Please contact your Technical Account Manager for any questions regarding the latest pattern release. Thank you, PSP 2.0 System == This e-mail is automatically generated by the PSP 2.0 system. Please do not reply. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:26 AM Subject: RE: Virus Yea, I read that one. It seems similar to what I'm getting. That's why I was wondering if it's a variant. I've noticed when I updated my pattern files that the new pattern file is 239 now. That's not even listed on the site. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_FINTAS.C -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus What is your AV calling it? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Is anyone getting hit with this? Or is this another variant of WORM_FINTAS.C? Hi,This is a special new game This game is my first work. You're the first player. I expect you would like it. VIRUS_DETECTED_AND_REMOVED_demo_VIRINFO.TXT real_estate[3].jpg ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: attachment size limits
You probably should place the limit on each mailbox as well. The MTA only is used between servers, so this would no apply to users on the same Exchange server. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits Size limits can be set at the IMC's General tab, and also at the MTA's General tab. In both cases the limit is for the whole message, and in the case of the IMC that means after encoding, which adds maybe 30% to the size of the attachment. -Peter -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 14:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits basically to limit users from sending 17 mb files. One of our directors tried it and it didn't work, which is good, but I don't actually know where this value is set. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: attachment size limits There are a number of possible places to set them depending on what one desires. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachment size limits Is there a place to set the attachment size limits in Exchange 5.5? I've looked and read through past exchange emails and found alot of discussions on what everyone is using, but nowhere to set them. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exhange/BDC tape backup question.
Exchange 5.5 sp4. Here's is my question. We have one PDC which serves as a IMC as well as an OWA server. We currently have a second system with is our BDC which also has IMC and OWA on it. Currently both systems have backup tape units and tapes rotated on the nightly basis. The BDC needs to be replaced and the question posed to me by management is do we need a tape drive. Management would like to get a 1u Dell (doesn't come with tape) and put it in the rack with our dedicated Exchange Servers. I have never put a production system in place without a tape unit. I can backup the Exchange DB's from one of our other Exchange servers, but I'm wondering what everyone's opinion is of not have a backup unit on this box and would there be any problems/issues that you could think of. Thanks in advance! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store fails to start
Event ID 7024, Source MSExchangeIS, Type error. Error code: 429496 I've seen this when the EXCHSRVR directories are included in the AV scans. Might want to check and make sure those directories are excluded from your AV software. I originally found information about this at www.eventid.net. Good Luck, Pete _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reasonable message size limits
We have the MTA's set for 20 meg. The IMS's set for 20 meg. And we also have each users profile for a maximum size of 20 meg. -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Reasonable message size limits This is a good question. I have personally limited it to 2MB (except the directors) with a hard ass approach at first. I will be raising it in a bit once people remember that they need to be reasonable in what they send (IE the guy in accounting who tried to email a 98MB file to himself at home). I am also curious to hear what people are limiting it to. -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 27, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reasonable message size limits Hello, I have been required to raise the message size limit on all connections to 20Mbs. We have already seen it cause problems across one of our links. I know it is dependent on the bandwidth and hardware. I just wanted to get some ideas of what size limits other companies are using. Thanks. Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2,000 scalability question.
Well, First let me apologize for the vagueness of this question. Just starting to read up on Exchange 2000. I've been asked by management to spec out the possibility of deploying Exchange 2,000 to all users on our campus (40,000 users). I'm reading Tony Redmond's book on Exchange 2000 and it mentions on page 21 that on 5.5 maximum user community was in reality about 3,000 per server for a 8 way. I know that really depends on the server setup, user load, etc. Our Dell 8650's with 2-550mhz processors and 2 gig of memory is handling about 3,000 users per server with 20 meg quotas per mailbox. They are active accounts (light to medium), so the 3,000 seems to match up since our system CPU utilization averaging about 80-90% during peak times. On the same page it states that Exchange 2000 states about 10,000 for a single node cluster. I'm wondering if anyone had opinions on this issue. What is different about Exchange 2000 that allows for more users per system. Is this do to coding changes in the store.exe or is it based on multiple stores per server? Given we can get about 3,000 users per Exchange 5.5, I'm wondering what the actual limit would be for Exchange 2000 per server. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 scalability question.
One change, Our Dells are 6350's not 8650's. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2,000 scalability question. Well, First let me apologize for the vagueness of this question. Just starting to read up on Exchange 2000. I've been asked by management to spec out the possibility of deploying Exchange 2,000 to all users on our campus (40,000 users). I'm reading Tony Redmond's book on Exchange 2000 and it mentions on page 21 that on 5.5 maximum user community was in reality about 3,000 per server for a 8 way. I know that really depends on the server setup, user load, etc. Our Dell 8650's with 2-550mhz processors and 2 gig of memory is handling about 3,000 users per server with 20 meg quotas per mailbox. They are active accounts (light to medium), so the 3,000 seems to match up since our system CPU utilization averaging about 80-90% during peak times. On the same page it states that Exchange 2000 states about 10,000 for a single node cluster. I'm wondering if anyone had opinions on this issue. What is different about Exchange 2000 that allows for more users per system. Is this do to coding changes in the store.exe or is it based on multiple stores per server? Given we can get about 3,000 users per Exchange 5.5, I'm wondering what the actual limit would be for Exchange 2000 per server. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
End of Support for MS products link
I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of life date for various MS products. I've looked high and low for it and can't seem to locate it. Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS site...but could no find anything. Anyone recall what the link was or tell me where the list is? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: End of Support for MS products link
Ahh! Life cycle was the key. I was looking under End of Life. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: End of Support for MS products link You could start here: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle.asp -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: End of Support for MS products link I recall that someone once posted a link to a page that stated the end of life date for various MS products. I've looked high and low for it and can't seem to locate it. Went to the archive, looked in TechNet, went to MS site...but could no find anything. Anyone recall what the link was or tell me where the list is? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook error on free/busy data.
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Got a user that is getting the enclosed error at times when accessing Outlook. Looking at Technet, I found article Q247972 which states that the Schedule + Free Busy Public Folder does not have Editor for Default Permissions. I check the folder and the settings are correct. The schedule+ free busy folder is on another server than the users mailbox. Does it make sense to replicate that information to the other server? I almost sounds like a communication issue between the users mailbox and the folder on the other server. Any other suggestions? Unable to update public free/busy data. You do not have sufficient permission to perform this operation on this object. See the folder contact or your system administrator. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMS Outbound mail hangs, IMS service does not respond.
I just upgraded our server to NT 4.0 SP6A and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Now one of our servers that houses the Internet Mail Service seems to stop processing mail every two weeks or so. My link monitors show the outbound queue stacking up mail, and when you try to stop the IMS service it says service does not respond. You have to reboot the processor then everything clears up fine. I ran the optimizer, but that didn't help. I was thinking about trying to re-installing the 5.5 service pack. Can you just re-install the SP without having to de-install? Any other suggestions? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS Outbound mail hangs, IMS service does not respond.
Not on the IMC's. I also applied the CDO and CDOHTML hotfix (Q289606) as recommended by Microsoft. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IMS Outbound mail hangs, IMS service does not respond. Any Exchange-aware antivirus scanners? ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Pfefferkorn, Pete | || (PFEFFEPE) | || [EMAIL PROTECTED] | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 01/08/2002 03:52 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- --| | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: IMS Outbound mail hangs, IMS service does not respond. | --- --| I just upgraded our server to NT 4.0 SP6A and Exchange 5.5 SP4. Now one of our servers that houses the Internet Mail Service seems to stop processing mail every two weeks or so. My link monitors show the outbound queue stacking up mail, and when you try to stop the IMS service it says service does not respond. You have to reboot the processor then everything clears up fine. I ran the optimizer, but that didn't help. I was thinking about trying to re-installing the 5.5 service pack. Can you just re-install the SP without having to de-install? Any other suggestions? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their current dat download is at 4179. -Original Message- From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant? So has anyone actually seen this puppy in the wild? NAI states Low Risk. Curious... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert B. http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99291 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert. Still trying to find out more about it, but I thought I would post this just in case. Trying to find out more on this one to see if there is an attachment I can block. From: Jodi Santini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Virus Alert - W32/ShakerWorld Posted on notice.oar.net 1/4/02: Virus Alert: There is a variation of the W32/ShakerWorld virus making its way around the Internet. We are have not found information on this virus at Symantec or CERT yet, but this what we have learned thus far from our internal security folks which you will want to watch out for on your networks: o Random 8 char. file in the System directory o Shake.exe in email (MassMailer) o NetBIOS connections spreading virus to servers o Registry entry 'sysinfo' under the run statement. Note that we are seeing variants in the name of the key sysinforandom chars People who have been hit have gotten this virus thorugh email. This virus can install a key in the registry of the infected systems. This is the information we have received at this time. Thank You, Jodi Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?
I just confirmed with OAR.NET. I saw the SHAKE.EXE reference but wasn't clear if that was the attachment name. We're already blocking EXE's so we seem to be safe. Better safe than sorry! -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant? What about the shake.exe file indicated in the message? Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus ShakerWorld variant? I just got a message from OAR.NET referring to a virus alert. Still trying to find out more about it, but I thought I would post this just in case. Trying to find out more on this one to see if there is an attachment I can block. From: Jodi Santini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 1:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Virus Alert - W32/ShakerWorld Posted on notice.oar.net 1/4/02: Virus Alert: There is a variation of the W32/ShakerWorld virus making its way around the Internet. We are have not found information on this virus at Symantec or CERT yet, but this what we have learned thus far from our internal security folks which you will want to watch out for on your networks: o Random 8 char. file in the System directory o Shake.exe in email (MassMailer) o NetBIOS connections spreading virus to servers o Registry entry 'sysinfo' under the run statement. Note that we are seeing variants in the name of the key sysinforandom chars People who have been hit have gotten this virus thorugh email. This virus can install a key in the registry of the infected systems. This is the information we have received at this time. Thank You, Jodi Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AVAPI Scanning question.
Exchange 5.5. We recently upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in AVAPI as well as MAPI mode. I'm a little confused on how the AVAPI works when it comes to cleaning and notifications. I know that you lose the sender and recipient information and I'm wondering why that is the case? Is it that MS did not put the hooks in for software companies to get that information in their AVAPI scanners? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting Permissions on Public Folders
Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of such, but never had a need to do so for public folders. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Limiting size of messages
If you highlight the server and click on MTA you will see a Message Size limit which should apply to all users on the server. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Limiting size of messages No, you need to do it at the mailbox level. Simplest way to do it is to do a directory export, manipulate the CSV in Excel, and import it back. Then modify your template user as well so the new users created also have the same limits. S. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Limiting size of messages Good afternoon, OUTLOOK 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4. How can I limit the size of message inside our organization? I know I can limit the size of messages bound to and from the Internet but how do I limit the size for in house eMAILs? On the Limits tab I see Message Sizes incoming and out going and I hope this is where I do this. Is there a global setting where all users are restricted equally? Happy holidays. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Limiting size of messages
I stand corrected. Seems like that would be a global setting though. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Limiting size of messages That won't work for all users on the server. The messages sent between users on the same server do not hit the MTA and therefore are not affected by the limits you set at the MTA. In order to achieve what he wants, he has to set the limits at the mailbox level. S. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Limiting size of messages If you highlight the server and click on MTA you will see a Message Size limit which should apply to all users on the server. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Limiting size of messages No, you need to do it at the mailbox level. Simplest way to do it is to do a directory export, manipulate the CSV in Excel, and import it back. Then modify your template user as well so the new users created also have the same limits. S. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Limiting size of messages Good afternoon, OUTLOOK 98. Exchange 5.5 SP4. How can I limit the size of message inside our organization? I know I can limit the size of messages bound to and from the Internet but how do I limit the size for in house eMAILs? On the Limits tab I see Message Sizes incoming and out going and I hope this is where I do this. Is there a global setting where all users are restricted equally? Happy holidays. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: stripping attachments
Doesn't Scan Mail allow you to replace the attached infected message with a replacement text file? I just upgraded and I though I saw that feature. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stripping attachments Did this behavior happen prior to the application of E2K SP2? -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/18/2001 4:07 AM Subject: RE: stripping attachments Trend Scanmail (183) for exchange 2000, Exch 2K SP2 -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December, 2001 4:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stripping attachments AV version? Server version and SP? -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/17/2001 7:32 AM Subject: stripping attachments Hi, Some virus infected mails get sstripped by Trend scanmail, but users'Outlook crashes when they have the preview pane open, how can I stop this? Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I get the administrative notifications. I'm talking about a user that sends an infected message. He does not recieve a notification that he sent an infected message. Only the recipient receives a message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed. As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
I'm going to during non-prime time. It took me a couple of days to track down why this was occuring. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU why dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After all that just start up the services again. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI MAPI mode.
Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52. I currently have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI mode. I was hoping that the MAPI mode would not create a realscan process for every 200 accounts that it logs into, as it did in the old version, but looks as if I'm wrong. Are the majority of the users who have 3.52 running in both modes or are most just running in AVAPI or MAPI? Also, has anyone seen problems running in both modes other than additional overhead on the system? I know the pro's and con's of each, just wondering what everyone else is doing. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI MAPI mode.
I take it you went to 3.7 ESE version? That is what I was going to go to, but Trend recommended the AVAPI since they were having issues with the ESE version. I didn't inquire exactly what the problems were. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI MAPI mode. I moved off of 3.52 to a later version a while ago so as not to have to deal with the 3.52 limitations and issues. MAPI mode will always require logging into the mailbox, it's a limitation of the methodology. For more information on the various scanning technologies available for Exchange and the limitations of same, I suggest asking Mr. Woodruff. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ScanMail 3.52 AVAPI MAPI mode. Well I finally bit the bullet and upgraded to ScanMail 3.52. I currently have it running in AVAPI mode as well as MAPI mode. I was hoping that the MAPI mode would not create a realscan process for every 200 accounts that it logs into, as it did in the old version, but looks as if I'm wrong. Are the majority of the users who have 3.52 running in both modes or are most just running in AVAPI or MAPI? Also, has anyone seen problems running in both modes other than additional overhead on the system? I know the pro's and con's of each, just wondering what everyone else is doing. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's infected. I don't see an option to delete the actual message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Ummm, how about deleting the message? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I had a user that received a message that was infected with the WORM_BADTRANS.B virus (attachment HAMSTER.DOC.pif). ScanMail caught the virus and deleted the attachment. Now if the user gets into OWA and tries to open the message...it kills IIS everytime. I put the message in my mailbox and I also duplicated the problem. Back to Microsoft for a fix!!! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
I've got a open incident call with Microsoft on this issue. I'll keep you informed. -Original Message- From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Ah ha! Somebody else has this problem! We have the same problem although we are using InoculateIT and I figured it was to blame, but it appears that Scanmail does the same. Even though the message's attachment has been deleted, when the message is read via OWA, you immediately start getting the dreaded ASP 0115 errors. Only a reboot of the machine will fix the problem... bouncing the service doesn't help. I have yet to find a solution except to inform the users not to open these messages via OWA... and we all now how good that works! So far I have had to reboot the server twice as a result of this virus's message. Let me know if you find a solution! Aaron -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I had a user that received a message that was infected with the WORM_BADTRANS.B virus (attachment HAMSTER.DOC.pif). ScanMail caught the virus and deleted the attachment. Now if the user gets into OWA and tries to open the message...it kills IIS everytime. I put the message in my mailbox and I also duplicated the problem. Back to Microsoft for a fix!!! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
It's catching the virus and deleting it. The message header is causing the problem from what I can see. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Why are you running ScanMail 3.02? There are older versions than that you can use. Maybe it's time to downgrade. I think the problem is with ScanMail here. I have a similar setup with up-to-date software and my logs show that I catch that same virus. Never had that issue. S. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's infected. I don't see an option to delete the actual message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Ummm, how about deleting the message? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I had a user that received a message that was infected with the WORM_BADTRANS.B virus (attachment HAMSTER.DOC.pif). ScanMail caught the virus and deleted the attachment. Now if the user gets into OWA and tries to open the message...it kills IIS everytime. I put the message in my mailbox and I also duplicated the problem. Back to Microsoft for a fix!!! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!!
I just got off the phone with Trend and it looks as if I'll be upgrading shortly. They did not recommend the ESE since they are experiencing some problems with it? They recommended going to the AVAPI version. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Verrry old version! I run 3.6 in ESE mode and don't have any problems. Are you not entitled to use the newest versions? -- Matthew -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! I'm just trying to say that you shouldn't rule out ScanMail as a potential problem. You're running a very old version. S -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! It's catching the virus and deleting it. The message header is causing the problem from what I can see. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Why are you running ScanMail 3.02? There are older versions than that you can use. Maybe it's time to downgrade. I think the problem is with ScanMail here. I have a similar setup with up-to-date software and my logs show that I catch that same virus. Never had that issue. S. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! I'm running ScanMail 3.02. I have it set to delete the attachment if it's infected. I don't see an option to delete the actual message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Ummm, how about deleting the message? -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Crashing...know cause!!! Exchange 5.5 SP4 I finally figured out what is causing our IIS to stop on our OWA servers. I had a user that received a message that was infected with the WORM_BADTRANS.B virus (attachment HAMSTER.DOC.pif). ScanMail caught the virus and deleted the attachment. Now if the user gets into OWA and tries to open the message...it kills IIS everytime. I put the message in my mailbox and I also duplicated the problem. Back to Microsoft for a fix!!! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
RE: Trend Micro ESE vs. AVAPI
I just got off the phone with Trend about upgrading and they recommended going to the AVAPI version since they were experiencing problems with the ESE. I was hoping to upgrade to the ESE later this week. I'll have to call them back and inquire about what issue they have with their ESE version. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TrendMicro ESE vs. AVAPI Well, it's Trend's first foray into the ESE methodology of scanning, so a little healthy caution is in order IMHO... But the ESE methodology of scanning bypasses several of the more annoying limitations of the 1.0 version of the AVAPI found in Exchange 5.5. You get access to not only the attachments, but also the message body and sender/recipient information using the ESE method. I don't believe that eManager works with 3.72 yet (could be wrong, feel free to correct me) so the content filtering aspect might not be attractive at this point, but knowing who the sender and recipient are of infected messages can be a useful feature. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TrendMicro ESE vs. AVAPI Good afternoon to you all: I am looking for some good reasons (other than trying to keep software up to date) as to why I want to load version 3.7 of Trend Micro's AV software for Exchange, rather than keep the current ver. 3.52. Yes, ESE is introduced, but what does that give me, when compared to the MAPI/AVAPI scanning I do now. Thanks for anything you can give me. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do the voices in my head bother you? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
