RE: Haiku Friday
Scaredy cat. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday note to self: I don't care how much Roger tries to bribe me, do not hire Jennifer -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday I had a browser opened to monster.com whenever my manager visited my office. I created a rule that responded to every piece of email from my manager with the subject line Groupshield Sucks. Every time I was called in the wee hours of the morning about an Exchange problem that was a result of Groupshield updates or scanning, I called my manager and woke him up. Disclaimer: These methods are not recommended and may cause undesired results. -Original Message- From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday Way to Go... How did you do that ? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday Sybari will reign In my environment soon Groupshield, kiss my ass. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: inbox repair tool
2GB PST = VERY BAD. I am not aware of any other repair tool besides SCANPST. If the PST cannot be opened and the user does not have a backup there is not much you can do. I have seen PSTs with far less get corrupted (and the user did not have a backup) and the mail was unrecoverable. The user may get mad, but the only person they can blame is themselves. I don't care if they are the CEO. The mail is toast. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 23:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: inbox repair tool..????
I know about pst2gb.exe which is available with Microsoft support ( not downloadable on any internet site) Maximum size limit for PST or OST IS 1.82GB as claimed by Microsoft.. Does anyone else aware of any third party software?? I know it is there.. I read about it long back.. Vikas -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: inbox repair tool 2GB PST = VERY BAD. I am not aware of any other repair tool besides SCANPST. If the PST cannot be opened and the user does not have a backup there is not much you can do. I have seen PSTs with far less get corrupted (and the user did not have a backup) and the mail was unrecoverable. The user may get mad, but the only person they can blame is themselves. I don't care if they are the CEO. The mail is toast. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 23:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: inbox repair tool
- Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:09 AM Subject: RE: inbox repair tool 2GB PST = VERY BAD. I am not aware of any other repair tool besides SCANPST. If the PST cannot be opened and the user does not have a backup there is not much you can do. I have seen PSTs with far less get corrupted (and the user did not have a backup) and the mail was unrecoverable. The user may get mad, but the only person they can blame is themselves. I don't care if they are the CEO. The mail is toast. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 23:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
That would depend on the size and complexity of your environment, what types of attachments that you need to allow into your company and how sensitive your company is to downtime due to a virus outbreak. Many of the anti virus vendors now have Consoles that can manage your deployments across multiple platforms and can provide those wonderful Dilbert reports. I wouldn't think your environment at 1300 users would require a full time position, but it would require someone that dedicated some number of hours per day/week towards antivirus. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
m someone dedicated -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? That would depend on the size and complexity of your environment, what types of attachments that you need to allow into your company and how sensitive your company is to downtime due to a virus outbreak. Many of the anti virus vendors now have Consoles that can manage your deployments across multiple platforms and can provide those wonderful Dilbert reports. I wouldn't think your environment at 1300 users would require a full time position, but it would require someone that dedicated some number of hours per day/week towards antivirus. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Ya forgot to salute!! And stand on attention when ya speak to us...:-) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Motivated, Dedicated and True to the Anti-Virus Role. BooYaa Sir! -Original Message- From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? m someone dedicated -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? That would depend on the size and complexity of your environment, what types of attachments that you need to allow into your company and how sensitive your company is to downtime due to a virus outbreak. Many of the anti virus vendors now have Consoles that can manage your deployments across multiple platforms and can provide those wonderful Dilbert reports. I wouldn't think your environment at 1300 users would require a full time position, but it would require someone that dedicated some number of hours per day/week towards antivirus. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Check the shoulder boards. That bird on my shoulder doesn't mean I'm a pirate. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Motivated, Dedicated and True to the Anti-Virus Role. BooYaa Sir! -Original Message- From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: AV! a full time job? m someone dedicated -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? That would depend on the size and complexity of your environment, what types of attachments that you need to allow into your company and how sensitive your company is to downtime due to a virus outbreak. Many of the anti virus vendors now have Consoles that can manage your deployments across multiple platforms and can provide those wonderful Dilbert reports. I wouldn't think your environment at 1300 users would require a full time position, but it would require someone that dedicated some number of hours per day/week towards antivirus. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
I think it depends on the size of your organization, among other things. AV does tend to be something that, once set up, requires only Harry PotterCONSTANT VIGILANCE!/Harry Potter and not a ton of maintenance. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Words - so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how to combine them. Nathaniel Hawthorne -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP
I love the part where he explains how to run OWA on Apache. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just. Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP OWA on IIS ewww. Unless of course you are lazy. I could go on. Yes, please go on. William -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Hmmm...neither are good. IMAP w/SSL w/b much better. OWA on IIS, ewww. Nimda, Code Red, RDS exploits, I could go on. Even SSL won't save you much. My .02 - Original Message - From: WebMeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:17 PM Subject: Dangers/Virtues of IMAP vs OWA and HTTP Any express opinions, on security or otherwise, on using Outlook Express and IMAP (port 143) vs Outlook Web Access and HTTP (port 80) to access Exchange 2000 through the firewall? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: inbox repair tool
Dear Sandeep, First of all, 51% or better of the members of this List Server believe that PST files are bad. So, you will probably receive a handful of flame messages. I, however, like PST files and see their purpose in business. I would copy the 2 GB PST file to another PC and then run SCANPST from that PC. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: inbox repair tool
No Flames. Peace on Earth and all that sorta stuff. Besides all the regular flamers are out of the office right now. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: inbox repair tool Dear Sandeep, First of all, 51% or better of the members of this List Server believe that PST files are bad. So, you will probably receive a handful of flame messages. I, however, like PST files and see their purpose in business. I would copy the 2 GB PST file to another PC and then run SCANPST from that PC. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Are you a circus clown then? :P -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est. (The designated hitter rule has got to go.) -- Henry Beard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Check the shoulder boards. That bird on my shoulder doesn't mean I'm a pirate. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Motivated, Dedicated and True to the Anti-Virus Role. BooYaa Sir! -Original Message- From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: AV! a full time job? m someone dedicated -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? That would depend on the size and complexity of your environment, what types of attachments that you need to allow into your company and how sensitive your company is to downtime due to a virus outbreak. Many of the anti virus vendors now have Consoles that can manage your deployments across multiple platforms and can provide those wonderful Dilbert reports. I wouldn't think your environment at 1300 users would require a full time position, but it would require someone that dedicated some number of hours per day/week towards antivirus. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
What about the eyepatch and the pegleg? Do THOSE mean you're a pirate? -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! It ain't the parts of the Bible that I can't understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand. (Mark Twain, american writer and humorist, 1835-1910) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Check the shoulder boards. That bird on my shoulder doesn't mean I'm a pirate. -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Motivated, Dedicated and True to the Anti-Virus Role. BooYaa Sir! -Original Message- From: Andy David [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: AV! a full time job? m someone dedicated -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? That would depend on the size and complexity of your environment, what types of attachments that you need to allow into your company and how sensitive your company is to downtime due to a virus outbreak. Many of the anti virus vendors now have Consoles that can manage your deployments across multiple platforms and can provide those wonderful Dilbert reports. I wouldn't think your environment at 1300 users would require a full time position, but it would require someone that dedicated some number of hours per day/week towards antivirus. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
It could be, depending on the company (someone has already hit on a number of different elements). It would also depend on how much AV your company has in place right now. If you're going from ZERO AV protection, yes, it should be a full time project until you have the layers of protection in place and running. This could be easily rolled into a generic network/computer security position, which should be a full time job. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
I disagree. Personally I think if you are a large organization you should have at least 2 people solely dedicated to keeping up with AV. It's a tough job to always be on top, and would require constant attention. Someone should be in place to be able to send emails and warn others of the hazards of virii on the horizon. If you are in such a large organization and you can afford to hire someone, I suggest you do so. In fact, I would gladly leave my position to take on an AV position in your company for 65K a year, full med and dental benefits, 5 weeks vacation, a free to use mobile phone, and sodas and snacks provided in office. Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **Please note, if you do not understand what SARCASM is, please be assured the above is a wonderful example of such** -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Anything to get out of Kansas, right? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I disagree. Personally I think if you are a large organization you should have at least 2 people solely dedicated to keeping up with AV. It's a tough job to always be on top, and would require constant attention. Someone should be in place to be able to send emails and warn others of the hazards of virii on the horizon. If you are in such a large organization and you can afford to hire someone, I suggest you do so. In fact, I would gladly leave my position to take on an AV position in your company for 65K a year, full med and dental benefits, 5 weeks vacation, a free to use mobile phone, and sodas and snacks provided in office. Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **Please note, if you do not understand what SARCASM is, please be assured the above is a wonderful example of such** -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Either that or just get a job where I sit on my butt all day and answer, Yes, sounds like a virus, have the PC Support Group reformat your computer and you should be ok or Nope, you don't have one, but thanks for calling. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Anything to get out of Kansas, right? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I disagree. Personally I think if you are a large organization you should have at least 2 people solely dedicated to keeping up with AV. It's a tough job to always be on top, and would require constant attention. Someone should be in place to be able to send emails and warn others of the hazards of virii on the horizon. If you are in such a large organization and you can afford to hire someone, I suggest you do so. In fact, I would gladly leave my position to take on an AV position in your company for 65K a year, full med and dental benefits, 5 weeks vacation, a free to use mobile phone, and sodas and snacks provided in office. Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **Please note, if you do not understand what SARCASM is, please be assured the above is a wonderful example of such** -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A call ndr
I ltry this option after chrismas -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Verzonden: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:09 AM Aan: Exchange Discussions Onderwerp: RE: A call ndr I am sure there is a tool in the bork that fixes this, and it might be the one known as clean sweep, but look up what's in there and look at the help files. I'm also sure that it's in the archives, but those are known to be less than reliable. -Original Message- From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A call ndr Brothers and sisters, I still have the same problem after i tried is/ds adjustment. To remember: the sender of calender meeting recieves ndr voor the recipient and also in some cases some messages. When i study ndr messege i notice that the recipient which is mentioned is the old (in most cases the second mailbox of the same user which has been deleted )mailbox. for example: I send a message or a meeting request to murat but i recieve ndr for murat2 after a while i recieve thatmessage has been delivered. And the reciever has the calender meeting request. In messages case if it goes wrong he event recieve the message but if you send the same message again he recieves it. This is being irritating. Has some one has a genius idea. Exchange 5.5 sp 3 with is, mta, ds post fixes, outlook 98, nt sp6a. kind regards murat _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing OBJ-Container
Is there a way in Exchange 5.5 sp4 to change a mailbox's OBJ-Container after it has already been applied to the generic recipients container? Is this possible to do without a directory export/import? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Dear Bob, Eric mentioned that he had 1300 users. I am wondering, How many NT Servers, or Total Servers?. How many Laptops and PCs? Wawa has one NT Server and one NT Workstation in each Store (525 Stores, and growing). The Server Farm at HQ has just over 90 NT Servers. We have 500 Laptop Users and 400 PC Users. The NT Servers are running NetShield 4.5, and are updated once a week. The Exchange Servers are running GroupShield 4.0.4 and are also updated once a week. I perform manual updates during virus alerts, but that is not a full time position. The Client configuration is part of the standard build (both Windows 95 and Windows 2000) for a weekly update. Once setup, what else needs to be done? What else warrants another full time employee? By the way, this is not a commercial for Network Associates. I recognize that other anti virus software applications are just as easily administrated. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 09:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I disagree. Personally I think if you are a large organization you should have at least 2 people solely dedicated to keeping up with AV. It's a tough job to always be on top, and would require constant attention. Someone should be in place to be able to send emails and warn others of the hazards of virii on the horizon. If you are in such a large organization and you can afford to hire someone, I suggest you do so. In fact, I would gladly leave my position to take on an AV position in your company for 65K a year, full med and dental benefits, 5 weeks vacation, a free to use mobile phone, and sodas and snacks provided in office. Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **Please note, if you do not understand what SARCASM is, please be assured the above is a wonderful example of such** -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting Permissions on Public Folders
Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of such, but never had a need to do so for public folders. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Dear Robert, Does this mean you aren't interested in hiring me for such a position? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Bob, Eric mentioned that he had 1300 users. I am wondering, How many NT Servers, or Total Servers?. How many Laptops and PCs? Wawa has one NT Server and one NT Workstation in each Store (525 Stores, and growing). The Server Farm at HQ has just over 90 NT Servers. We have 500 Laptop Users and 400 PC Users. The NT Servers are running NetShield 4.5, and are updated once a week. The Exchange Servers are running GroupShield 4.0.4 and are also updated once a week. I perform manual updates during virus alerts, but that is not a full time position. The Client configuration is part of the standard build (both Windows 95 and Windows 2000) for a weekly update. Once setup, what else needs to be done? What else warrants another full time employee? By the way, this is not a commercial for Network Associates. I recognize that other anti virus software applications are just as easily administrated. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 09:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I disagree. Personally I think if you are a large organization you should have at least 2 people solely dedicated to keeping up with AV. It's a tough job to always be on top, and would require constant attention. Someone should be in place to be able to send emails and warn others of the hazards of virii on the horizon. If you are in such a large organization and you can afford to hire someone, I suggest you do so. In fact, I would gladly leave my position to take on an AV position in your company for 65K a year, full med and dental benefits, 5 weeks vacation, a free to use mobile phone, and sodas and snacks provided in office. Thanks, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA Internet/WAN Specialist 913-339-6700 X194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **Please note, if you do not understand what SARCASM is, please be assured the above is a wonderful example of such** -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting Permissions on Public Folders
Dear Pete, Use System Distribution Lists for administering the permissions on your Public Folders. Then it is a matter of SDL membership. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 09:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Setting Permissions on Public Folders Exchange 5.5 SP4. We have a large number of public folders and I would like to add a user as an owner of the folders. I'm looking for a way to import that information versus selecting each folder and manually doing it. I'm familiar with directory export and exporting mailbox and importing of such, but never had a need to do so for public folders. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing OBJ-Container
Its not possible even WITH a directory export/import. Object Container is the container in which the object resides. The only way to change that is to move the object to a new container, which means deleting and recreating the object. Now, the delete and recreate CAN be done via export/import, but there is that crucial middle step of saving the information in the object (in the case of mailboxes). -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Friese, Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Changing OBJ-Container Is there a way in Exchange 5.5 sp4 to change a mailbox's OBJ-Container after it has already been applied to the generic recipients container? Is this possible to do without a directory export/import? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Setting Permissions on Public Folders
also, use the PF tools on the resource kit to set the permissions. k |;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Garrish, Robert B. Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Setting Permissions on Public Folders Dear Pete, Use System Distribution Lists for administering the permissions on your Public Folders. Then it is a matter of SDL membership. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: inbox repair tool
And it would still be broken2GB limit and all that. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: inbox repair tool Dear Sandeep, First of all, 51% or better of the members of this List Server believe that PST files are bad. So, you will probably receive a handful of flame messages. I, however, like PST files and see their purpose in business. I would copy the 2 GB PST file to another PC and then run SCANPST from that PC. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New mail notification
Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped receiving new mail notifications. I have a sniffer on my exchange box and conducted two packet captures. The first is between exchange and a local machine. Outlook is open when the capture is started, and a new piece of mail is sent to the clients mailbox. The first two packets seen are UDP and sent from Exchange to the client machine, notifying it of the new mail. The second capture is between Exchange and a client on the WAN. Following the same procedure, it appears that no UDP packets are sent to that client machine. Any ideas why the Exchange machine is not sending these packets out? We are using Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 2000. The sites are connected via frame relay. There is no NAT taking place and the routers have no filters set on them. Thanks _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GAL and Address Book Views
Check the E2K FAQ in the link below, most of the address list population rules there apply to 5.5 as well. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Smith, Calvin C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GAL and Address Book Views In Exchange 5.5 on NT 4. In my test environment, I have created Address Book Views. Then I set an anonymous account on the DS Site Configuration. I also gave the search permission to the service account for the Organization and gave search permission to Domain Users for the Address Book Views. There are two views and the permission is given at the root. I did all this in an effort to control which folders of addresses the users would see when they run Outlook. It all works fine except for one issue: When running Outlook and checking the Address Book the entries under Global Address List only include records seen in one of the Address Book Views. Both address book views are listed below the Global Address List and they show the addresses that would be expected. I thought that Global Address List would contain all the records that could be seen in the address folders shown below it. Can anybody tell me why Global Address List in Outlook doesn't contain all the addresses shown in the Address Book Views listed below it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOOA
Didn't I answer this question earlier this week? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOOA I have been trying to post a message the has Out o' Off. Asst. in the body and it doesn't get posted. Is there a way to turn this on for Eudora pop clients? This is a setting at the mailbox level is it not? Could you not use an ADSI editor to flip a switch or something? This is for Exchange 5.5. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOOA
I'd tend to disagree. -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOA Using CDO does it require that a MAPI client be installed on the users workstation. Darrin Carter CNE, MCP+I, MCSE, CCA Senior Systems Engineer Elegrity, Inc. 415.821.0900 (main) 415.826.7758 (fax) 415.726.0413 (direct) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elegrity.com -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOOA Easiest way would be to have them set it via OWA. Barring that, I believe it can be set via CDO (www.cdolive.com). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 12/17/2001 4:53 PM Subject: OOOA Out of Off. Asst. Is there a way to turn this on for Eudora pop clients? This is a setting at the mailbox level is it not? Could you not use an ADSI editor to flip a switch or something? This is for Exchange 5.5. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOOA
It is part of Outlook, not Exchange. Though I believe it works with Exchange. Why are you using a POP client for Exchange anyhoo?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOOA I have been trying to post a message the has Out o' Off. Asst. in the body and it doesn't get posted. Is there a way to turn this on for Eudora pop clients? This is a setting at the mailbox level is it not? Could you not use an ADSI editor to flip a switch or something? This is for Exchange 5.5. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing OBJ-Container
FAQ - Original Message - From: Friese, Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM Subject: Changing OBJ-Container Is there a way in Exchange 5.5 sp4 to change a mailbox's OBJ-Container after it has already been applied to the generic recipients container? Is this possible to do without a directory export/import? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by?
Aruplabs.com... huh. Now we know where the odd message with subject X and body ABC1234567890DEF came from. Wasn't real ethical of ya, Eric, masquerading as someone else. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:07 PM Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Into pathology? We are ARUP , P as in Pathologists. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? S -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? So THAT's what's going on over in the Pathology lab. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? I usually carry a network cable with me. Which tells them I'm either a) fixing a network problem or b) on my way to an SM party. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Be sure when walking through the office to always have a piece of paper in your hand. Look serious and keep referring it to it as you walk. -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Easily counteracted by HHCLB [1] [1] Here He Comes--Look Busy -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? I've mastered sleeping with my eyes open. I only wake up for the daily lunch time Unreal Tournament slaughter. Today I'm employing my favorite manager technique, MBWA [1] [1] Manage By Wandering Around -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Don't jinx it. The mangers are sleeping. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Sure is quiet today. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by?
I wasn't aware that we were spamming nimda. Would you happen to have a header I could look at? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Aruplabs.com... huh. Now we know where the odd message with subject X and body ABC1234567890DEF came from. Wasn't real ethical of ya, Eric, masquerading as someone else. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:07 PM Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Into pathology? We are ARUP , P as in Pathologists. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? S -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? So THAT's what's going on over in the Pathology lab. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? I usually carry a network cable with me. Which tells them I'm either a) fixing a network problem or b) on my way to an SM party. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Be sure when walking through the office to always have a piece of paper in your hand. Look serious and keep referring it to it as you walk. -Original Message- From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Easily counteracted by HHCLB [1] [1] Here He Comes--Look Busy -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? I've mastered sleeping with my eyes open. I only wake up for the daily lunch time Unreal Tournament slaughter. Today I'm employing my favorite manager technique, MBWA [1] [1] Manage By Wandering Around -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Don't jinx it. The mangers are sleeping. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Sure is quiet today. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: New mail notification
Multiple NICs in the Exchange box? Are you sniffing for the packets somewhere where you can definitively say the Exchange server is not sending the packets? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Steve Van Eck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New mail notification Recently, the client machines at my WAN sites stopped receiving new mail notifications. I have a sniffer on my exchange box and conducted two packet captures. The first is between exchange and a local machine. Outlook is open when the capture is started, and a new piece of mail is sent to the clients mailbox. The first two packets seen are UDP and sent from Exchange to the client machine, notifying it of the new mail. The second capture is between Exchange and a client on the WAN. Following the same procedure, it appears that no UDP packets are sent to that client machine. Any ideas why the Exchange machine is not sending these packets out? We are using Exchange 5.5 with Outlook 2000. The sites are connected via frame relay. There is no NAT taking place and the routers have no filters set on them. Thanks _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry people
Apparently we were spamming nimda for 3 days starting on the 22nd, it appears to have been fixed and I don't remember addressing it. Long story. Anyway if you got spam from us I am sorry. Eric Hansen ARUP Labs _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by?
yeah, U shuld no use other persons mask. === Amit the CyBer DooD === -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Aruplabs.com... huh. Now we know where the odd message with subject X and body ABC1234567890DEF came from. Wasn't real ethical of ya, Eric, masquerading as someone else. - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:07 PM Subject: RE: Is that a tumbleweed rolling by? Into pathology? We are ARUP , P as in Pathologists. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Uninstall Groupshield (was Haiku Friday)
I had to write a script to uninstall the McAffe desktop AV product because their uninstall didn't work Imagine my surprise when after first trying the manual uninstall instructions supplied by their technical support to the letter I wound up disabling any other NAI product installed on the machine. Geniuses. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 8:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Uninstall Groupshield (was Haiku Friday) I have the 4 page version on How to uninstall Groupshield, but I need the Attention deficit disorder version. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Do you ever read any whitepapers or manuals? This is pretty friggin self explanatory sh!t. D The road to a friend's house is never long. -Danish proverb -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Don where all the white papers at!! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I dont have a big enough tape drive to do a full back this suxs -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Gee, ever been to www.microsoft.com/exchange ? If a trainstation is where the train stops, what's a workstation...? -Anon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Don where all the white papers at!! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I dont have a big enough tape drive to do a full back this suxs -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
If you are doing an Exchange aware backup Full usually means a full backup of the database (DS/IS) only, plus flushing out the transaction logs, etc. Anything else needs a regular file level backup. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when complete preferably with Circular logging disabled. D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Use an open file manager:) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when complete preferably with Circular logging disabled. D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Why would you want to? D Revolution is a trivial shift in the emphasis of suffering. -Tom Stoppard -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Use an open file manager:) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when complete preferably with Circular logging disabled. D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Why not??? :) Actually if it worked right it would be cool because it would be like having an offline backup everynight. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Why would you want to? D Revolution is a trivial shift in the emphasis of suffering. -Tom Stoppard -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Use an open file manager:) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when complete preferably with Circular logging disabled. D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Uh huh... Me thinks that theory is not AB approved. ;o) D I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have. -Thomas Jefferson -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Why not??? :) Actually if it worked right it would be cool because it would be like having an offline backup everynight. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Why would you want to? D Revolution is a trivial shift in the emphasis of suffering. -Tom Stoppard -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Use an open file manager:) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when complete preferably with Circular logging disabled. D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
No...sadly it is not...I cant even approve my own theory -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Uh huh... Me thinks that theory is not AB approved. ;o) D I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have. -Thomas Jefferson -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Why not??? :) Actually if it worked right it would be cool because it would be like having an offline backup everynight. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Why would you want to? D Revolution is a trivial shift in the emphasis of suffering. -Tom Stoppard -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Use an open file manager:) -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Tis not necessary. You should backup the priv, pub, and log files. Flush the logs when complete preferably with Circular logging disabled. D Get all over this like a donkey on a waffle. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
I remember in my last review my boss wrote Martin watches over the Exchange server and the Antivirus like a hawk That is the key. Pay attention. Even the best automated system needs to be watched. Someone always needs to verify the latest patterns are being DL'd and distributed, that the correct extensions are blocked, etc. It doesn't need to be full time, just part time, done right. -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook name not resolving
Good afternoon group, Happy Holidays OUTLOOK 98 NT 5.5 SP4 I have a mailbox name that does not resolve when it is typed in its completed name: Kelli Kappus When I key in Kell Kap or anything similar it resolves. The problem I see is the directory name is Kelly.Kappus We found out the real name was Kelli so we changed it on the general tab. Is this why the name does not resolve? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Can I telecommute? If so, I think it might be appropriate as well. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Ah So what you really need is a highly paid consultant to administer ThE sTiCk [tm] and provide a verbose action plan. I happen to be available for that as well. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: AV! a full time job?
So it really isn't a matter of too much work, but rather a matter of poor management. In any company, but in particular one your size, allowing departments to manage computers is a recipe for disaster. It probably seemed like a good idea at the time, but not any longer. There should be a central point of contact for all machines. Orders are placed through that group and delivered to them for configuration and delivery to the end users or departments. That way all hardware is fully tracked and managed. You should be using logon scripts as one method of pushing out AV installs and DAT updates. That way for someone to login, AV software has to be installed. I would suggest rather than spend 50-60K a year for an AV tech, that you put that time / money into better management. Ill bet you if you went to upper management and said OK, we need a new hardware procedure, OR we need to spend 60K a year for an AV guy, they would let you have your way -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: AV! a full time job?
I agree. The idea that you could have 15 computers on your network (in your domain?) without knowing about it is a clear indication that management ISN'T doing its job... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Pray that there is a god, my little flock, because only a god can stop the eventual entropic destruction of the universe. (Schlock Mercenary - http://www.schlockmercenary.com) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? So it really isn't a matter of too much work, but rather a matter of poor management. In any company, but in particular one your size, allowing departments to manage computers is a recipe for disaster. It probably seemed like a good idea at the time, but not any longer. There should be a central point of contact for all machines. Orders are placed through that group and delivered to them for configuration and delivery to the end users or departments. That way all hardware is fully tracked and managed. You should be using logon scripts as one method of pushing out AV installs and DAT updates. That way for someone to login, AV software has to be installed. I would suggest rather than spend 50-60K a year for an AV tech, that you put that time / money into better management. Ill bet you if you went to upper management and said OK, we need a new hardware procedure, OR we need to spend 60K a year for an AV guy, they would let you have your way -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: AV! a full time job?
At this point its sad to say the LAZY super is here to stay and so are the independent departments. So he is looking at the best way to deal with the workload. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I agree. The idea that you could have 15 computers on your network (in your domain?) without knowing about it is a clear indication that management ISN'T doing its job... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Pray that there is a god, my little flock, because only a god can stop the eventual entropic destruction of the universe. (Schlock Mercenary - http://www.schlockmercenary.com) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? So it really isn't a matter of too much work, but rather a matter of poor management. In any company, but in particular one your size, allowing departments to manage computers is a recipe for disaster. It probably seemed like a good idea at the time, but not any longer. There should be a central point of contact for all machines. Orders are placed through that group and delivered to them for configuration and delivery to the end users or departments. That way all hardware is fully tracked and managed. You should be using logon scripts as one method of pushing out AV installs and DAT updates. That way for someone to login, AV software has to be installed. I would suggest rather than spend 50-60K a year for an AV tech, that you put that time / money into better management. Ill bet you if you went to upper management and said OK, we need a new hardware procedure, OR we need to spend 60K a year for an AV guy, they would let you have your way -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: AV! a full time job?
No, he is looking to increase his empire. Let him hire another admin and then use him for your own purposes when he's not working on AV. Within 6 months you'll have yourself a minion. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At this point its sad to say the LAZY super is here to stay and so are the independent departments. So he is looking at the best way to deal with the workload. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I agree. The idea that you could have 15 computers on your network (in your domain?) without knowing about it is a clear indication that management ISN'T doing its job... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Pray that there is a god, my little flock, because only a god can stop the eventual entropic destruction of the universe. (Schlock Mercenary - http://www.schlockmercenary.com) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? So it really isn't a matter of too much work, but rather a matter of poor management. In any company, but in particular one your size, allowing departments to manage computers is a recipe for disaster. It probably seemed like a good idea at the time, but not any longer. There should be a central point of contact for all machines. Orders are placed through that group and delivered to them for configuration and delivery to the end users or departments. That way all hardware is fully tracked and managed. You should be using logon scripts as one method of pushing out AV installs and DAT updates. That way for someone to login, AV software has to be installed. I would suggest rather than spend 50-60K a year for an AV tech, that you put that time / money into better management. Ill bet you if you went to upper management and said OK, we need a new hardware procedure, OR we need to spend 60K a year for an AV guy, they would let you have your way -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December
RE: inbox repair tool
Maybe he can open the PST in a hex editor, cut and paste half of it to a new file and divide it in two. Then he'll have two PST files both under 2GB. Sandeep, For a useful answer, please go to www.microsoft.com/technet and type My PST is over 2 GB and click on the Search button. You will get three articles which tell you exactly how to solve your problem. S. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: inbox repair tool And it would still be broken2GB limit and all that. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: inbox repair tool Dear Sandeep, First of all, 51% or better of the members of this List Server believe that PST files are bad. So, you will probably receive a handful of flame messages. I, however, like PST files and see their purpose in business. I would copy the 2 GB PST file to another PC and then run SCANPST from that PC. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sandeep Raghuraman , Gurgaon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: inbox repair tool Guru's I have a peculiar problem in repairing a PST file which got corrupted.Exchange server 5.5 with sp4Mails are downloaded locally in personal folder for users with outlook2K.One user is having 2GB personal folder which got corrupted.On running Inbox Repair tool it is giving error An unexpected error while runing scanpst... Mails in this file are very important for me.Is there any way by which these e-mails can be retrieved or any other repair tool... Thanks in advance, Sandeep Raghuraman.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitoring email
Yeah but that won't catch everything. What if the person sends a message, then shift deletes it and empties his dumpster all within 30 seconds? The proper answer has been given by Tom and reinforced by Ed. Don't stir the waters now. S. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 5:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitoring email I would probably set permissions to their mailboxes to allow whome ever you want to open the mailbox so they can see what is going on in all the folders. That would allow constant monitoring without them knowing. Alternatly, exmerge or export out the mailbox to a PST, to see what has occured in the past. Both are very simple and quick solutions that will allow you to build a monitoring serve3r at your leasure. Jeremy Johnston Senior Consultant All Bases Covered _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: number of recipients
You know, make sure that the business side doesn't get pissed off when you stop the spammers in your company. We don't like spam, but some PHBs may believe that it is a vital business tool. S. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: number of recipients Thanks! I'm psyched! I can stop the spammers of my company _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Any job where one is expected to be perfect is job is full time. If you don't think so ask all the Security personal who were sacked after I Love You went around. Anti-Virus really should be included in the job description of your Security Manager. It also depends on the size of your environment. Obviously if you have 10 PCs you don't need a security manager. But then again if you have 10 PCs you probably don't need an IT staff. I would say that if your environment is over 1000 PCs then it would pay to have a full time security person. If not, the guy who is assigned to do it should make sure he has his manager signs a disclaimer, I will not be held responsible for any damage caused to the network by viruii which were contracted while I was accomplishing the task for which I was hired. It's a bit harsh, yes, but you need to protect yourself from those big fat corporate types in times like these. -cm -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Dear Eric, Anti Virus is important, but not a full time job. The Anti Virus software that your company selects should be automatic in certain respects, so that it takes care of itself (updates, scans, etc.). Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 05:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
How are they joining machines w/o your knowledge? Time to change some passwords. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: AV! a full time job? Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Deleting Empty ABV's
[Darren Ash] I need to delete some emptry address book views but when i try I am told i do not have permission. Logged in as Administrator, NT4, SP6, Ex 5.5 (SP4). Any ideas anyone ? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Sorry our admin proxys out microsoft.com, he says since they're criminals he rates their site right up there with hacking and porn sites. :) -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Gee, ever been to www.microsoft.com/exchange ? If a trainstation is where the train stops, what's a workstation...? -Anon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Don where all the white papers at!! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I dont have a big enough tape drive to do a full back this suxs -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting Empty ABV's
Darren, The administrator may not be the administrator of the mail system!. SMcG -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: December 27 2001 7:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deleting Empty ABV's [Darren Ash] I need to delete some emptry address book views but when i try I am told i do not have permission. Logged in as Administrator, NT4, SP6, Ex 5.5 (SP4). Any ideas anyone ? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting Empty ABV's
You should double check what rights you actually have. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deleting Empty ABV's [Darren Ash] I need to delete some emptry address book views but when i try I am told i do not have permission. Logged in as Administrator, NT4, SP6, Ex 5.5 (SP4). Any ideas anyone ? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus Alert - W32/Zoher@MM
Dear DL Members, Wawa received about six infected messages. NAI has an extra.dat for it. http://vil.nai.com/VIL/newly-discovered-viruses.asp http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99287 Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTPmail
No, you can't really do it [1]. Because, the incoming SMTP messages are not coming from your IMS, they are coming from individuals. Also, both you and Daniel are right. In E2K, you need to give create rights to Anonymous as opposed to Default. However, in E5.5, default=create is what you need. S. [1] You can always write a custom event and somehow go through the SMTP headers to see if your IMS server is in the headers and reject the message if it's not. [2] [2] But why? What on earth are you trying to accomplish? -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail Actually, if I give Default the 'create' right all is good, I've tried it. (EX5.5) But I'm wondering if I can give the specific IMS user (if one exists) the right. Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 16:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail No. You have to give anonymous the permission. - Original Message - From: Walden H. Leverich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:10 PM Subject: Permissions necessary for public folder to receive SMTP mail I have a public folder with an SMTP address. I currently have the Default user permissions set to None, but with that setting I can't receive SMTP mail. If I give Default create rights I'm fine, but is there a user I can add that would only allow the IMS to create messages in there? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516)627-3800 x11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Eric, We are using the same AV you are and we are approximately the same size you are. We got the Symantec Corporate 7.6 upgrade about a week ago. Side Note: With XP/NAV 7.6 installed on a workstation, you will have to turn off your AV software before trying to burn a CD. As Ed Crowley (ONE of my heroes among MANY on this list) is so fond of stating, There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. Your management needs to do what our management here has done. No server OR workstation is connected to our network, without our permission...period. People are going to whine and cry until they get used to it, but both your life and theirs will be less stressful and simpler, once this is done. We have about 950 users, with about 1150 workstations and servers. Two of the departments in our IT org are the Help Desk and the Network Infrastructure departments. No workstation is allowed on the network without the Help Desk first installing an image that contains all the basic workstation apps, NAV for the desktop, SMS 2.0, patches, upgrades, blah blah blah. No server is ever put on the network without our Network Infrastructure group building the server ourselves. Once a server is built, it goes into the cypher-locked server room...Nobody but the Ifrastructure group has access to the server room. Now...once you have all that in place, you are set to introduce the company to SMS 2.0. Our SMS Admin has created NAV packages, based on the workstation type found by the login script. The login script checks for SMS...if not there somehow, it's logged in the SMS DB and the Help Desk is sent out to install it. Once that happens, the machine is assimilated, software inventory is done, NAV is installed and the WS is virus scanned. NAV on the WS is locked down and cannot be turned off. The uninstall is password protected. If they *somehow* manage to get it uninstalled, then the next time they logon, it's reinstalled. NAV can be set up to download the latest .dat files at a specific time, pushed out to distribution points and then to the WS's and servers...much like SMS. Not only that, but we also have a Linux 7.0 mail relayer running Qmail and Qmail Scan that blocks attachment and subject types before ever getting to the network. We haven't been infected since before Melissa knock on wood. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday,
RE: Outlook name not resolving
Dear Mike, The name should be resolved if you use the Directory Name or the Alias. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook name not resolving Good afternoon group, Happy Holidays OUTLOOK 98 NT 5.5 SP4 I have a mailbox name that does not resolve when it is typed in its completed name: Kelli Kappus When I key in Kell Kap or anything similar it resolves. The problem I see is the directory name is Kelly.Kappus We found out the real name was Kelli so we changed it on the general tab. Is this why the name does not resolve? Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus?
Actually they renamed it again. It's no longer MMS. Now they call it Secure Mail. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus? You can't really blame Kmart for this one.G Just remember, it all started going downhill with the name change from Worldsecure to Tumbleweed MMS. Tom. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus? You can't do that. Tumbleweed doesn't plug in to Exchange. The other way around is feasible though. Use Tumbleweed as your DMZ SMTP and utilize SMTP mail scanning and use ScanMail internally. We've been using Tumbleweed for a few years now and I'm afraid their support has gone downhill since we purchased it [1]. Now they want to charge us an outrageous amount for a version upgrade (more expensive than the original purchase price) even though we have always had maintenance. I would really consider other products before committing yourself. MailSweeper and Praetor are the ones that I had liked. S. [1] Everything that touches Kmart seems to start having problems [2] [2] Which explains the slow but steady decline in my mental stability. -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus? I would not dump scanmail...maybe I could leave Trend on the internet gateway and run Tumbleweed internally in order to have dual coverage. just an idea. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tumbleweed Antivirus? I would stay with Scanmail. Why dump something that works perfect -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tumbleweed Antivirus? We currently use Trend Micro Scanmail 3.52 and I couldn't be any happier with it. However, there is a plan in place to globally purchase the Tumbleweed Product. 'They' want to know if we are intersted in using it if they do purchase for the entire site. Does anyone have any experience with Tumbleweed? I've never heard of it and their website is a bit vague. I would have a very hard time scrapping scanmail, they have saved our butts many times. Maybe I could make a dual effort fighting the virus attacks. thanks... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
I'm having a little trouble here. I wonder several things based on that statement, including; why would you stay there, why the CIO/IT Director would allow such idiocy, what failed dot.com did the admin that blocks microsoft.com came from, and why would you stay there? [1] [1] Yes Andy, I said that same thing twice. -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Sorry our admin proxys out microsoft.com, he says since they're criminals he rates their site right up there with hacking and porn sites. :) -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Gee, ever been to www.microsoft.com/exchange ? If a trainstation is where the train stops, what's a workstation...? -Anon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Don where all the white papers at!! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I dont have a big enough tape drive to do a full back this suxs -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Who has the ultimate responsibility for the overall functionality of the network? If it's you, you're the boss - change the passwords and tell them to stick it! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Other departments who have the rights to do it. We have argued this to the Nth degree, trust me its beyond all hope. If we change passwords we get chewed out and told to change them back. -Original Message- From: Anderson, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How are they joining machines w/o your knowledge? Time to change some passwords. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: AV! a full time job? Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have someone like Technical Account Manager, TAM. Once you have those communcation method established, you have to have software that can distribute updates automatically and fast. My two cents... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AV! a full time job? Just curious what some of the Exchange Admins think. Would you consider Antivirus a full time job? I speak for both email and network/desktop. Around here it isn't, although we wish it was cause it seems to be getting neglected. We are around 1300 users right now. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: AV! a full time job?
Can I quote you on some of this? I'm always looking for ammo when it comes to changing my group to a more aggressive style. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Eric, We are using the same AV you are and we are approximately the same size you are. We got the Symantec Corporate 7.6 upgrade about a week ago. Side Note: With XP/NAV 7.6 installed on a workstation, you will have to turn off your AV software before trying to burn a CD. As Ed Crowley (ONE of my heroes among MANY on this list) is so fond of stating, There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. Your management needs to do what our management here has done. No server OR workstation is connected to our network, without our permission...period. People are going to whine and cry until they get used to it, but both your life and theirs will be less stressful and simpler, once this is done. We have about 950 users, with about 1150 workstations and servers. Two of the departments in our IT org are the Help Desk and the Network Infrastructure departments. No workstation is allowed on the network without the Help Desk first installing an image that contains all the basic workstation apps, NAV for the desktop, SMS 2.0, patches, upgrades, blah blah blah. No server is ever put on the network without our Network Infrastructure group building the server ourselves. Once a server is built, it goes into the cypher-locked server room...Nobody but the Ifrastructure group has access to the server room. Now...once you have all that in place, you are set to introduce the company to SMS 2.0. Our SMS Admin has created NAV packages, based on the workstation type found by the login script. The login script checks for SMS...if not there somehow, it's logged in the SMS DB and the Help Desk is sent out to install it. Once that happens, the machine is assimilated, software inventory is done, NAV is installed and the WS is virus scanned. NAV on the WS is locked down and cannot be turned off. The uninstall is password protected. If they *somehow* manage to get it uninstalled, then the next time they logon, it's reinstalled. NAV can be set up to download the latest .dat files at a specific time, pushed out to distribution points and then to the WS's and servers...much like SMS. Not only that, but we also have a Linux 7.0 mail relayer running Qmail and Qmail Scan that blocks attachment and subject types before ever getting to the network. We haven't been infected since before Melissa knock on wood. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? I don't think this is a full time job. If you have a full time position just for A/V, you'd have to have a backup person since viruses do not take any vacation. Instead of having full time position, pay A/V vendor to notify you ( other support staffs) when there's new virus via pager, cell phone, email, etc. If you want to have closer relationship with A/V vendor, pay more money to have
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
I say bully for him and that you feel that all the Unix/Linux sites are devoted to hackers and people that waste their time so you're going to block e-mails from sun.com etc. etc. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I'm having a little trouble here. I wonder several things based on that statement, including; why would you stay there, why the CIO/IT Director would allow such idiocy, what failed dot.com did the admin that blocks microsoft.com came from, and why would you stay there? [1] [1] Yes Andy, I said that same thing twice. -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Sorry our admin proxys out microsoft.com, he says since they're criminals he rates their site right up there with hacking and porn sites. :) -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Gee, ever been to www.microsoft.com/exchange ? If a trainstation is where the train stops, what's a workstation...? -Anon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Don where all the white papers at!! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I dont have a big enough tape drive to do a full back this suxs -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AV! a full time job?
Quote away! You can also add in there that we were just subjected to a GOA (Gov. Office of Accountability) audit of our network infrastructure and security practices. Due to about 5 people in this company that are infinitely smarter than I am, we passed with flying colors and are now used as the comparison standard for these audits. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Can I quote you on some of this? I'm always looking for ammo when it comes to changing my group to a more aggressive style. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Eric, We are using the same AV you are and we are approximately the same size you are. We got the Symantec Corporate 7.6 upgrade about a week ago. Side Note: With XP/NAV 7.6 installed on a workstation, you will have to turn off your AV software before trying to burn a CD. As Ed Crowley (ONE of my heroes among MANY on this list) is so fond of stating, There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. Your management needs to do what our management here has done. No server OR workstation is connected to our network, without our permission...period. People are going to whine and cry until they get used to it, but both your life and theirs will be less stressful and simpler, once this is done. We have about 950 users, with about 1150 workstations and servers. Two of the departments in our IT org are the Help Desk and the Network Infrastructure departments. No workstation is allowed on the network without the Help Desk first installing an image that contains all the basic workstation apps, NAV for the desktop, SMS 2.0, patches, upgrades, blah blah blah. No server is ever put on the network without our Network Infrastructure group building the server ourselves. Once a server is built, it goes into the cypher-locked server room...Nobody but the Ifrastructure group has access to the server room. Now...once you have all that in place, you are set to introduce the company to SMS 2.0. Our SMS Admin has created NAV packages, based on the workstation type found by the login script. The login script checks for SMS...if not there somehow, it's logged in the SMS DB and the Help Desk is sent out to install it. Once that happens, the machine is assimilated, software inventory is done, NAV is installed and the WS is virus scanned. NAV on the WS is locked down and cannot be turned off. The uninstall is password protected. If they *somehow* manage to get it uninstalled, then the next time they logon, it's reinstalled. NAV can be set up to download the latest .dat files at a specific time, pushed out to distribution points and then to the WS's and servers...much like SMS. Not only that, but we also have a Linux 7.0 mail relayer running Qmail and Qmail Scan that blocks attachment and subject types before ever getting to the network. We haven't been infected since before Melissa knock on wood. Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Symantec Corporate, 7.5. Waiting for 7.6 to arrive. We also will be purchasing a Mcafee e500. A good portion of or problems relate to a LAZY supervisor and several departments that are in charge of their own equipment. Just yesterday we ran into a lab that had 15 new machines on our domain that we didn't know about. All without any AV and 2 were nimda monsters. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? What are you using for your AV solution? -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? At 1300 machines given the problems we appear to be having, the guy that does our AV wants a FTE created for it because he feels it would be appropriate. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? How big is your company? Is 10,000 users enough for it to be a full time job? 100,000 users? It varies from org to org. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers. --Dr. Martin Luther
Re: E5.5 connections same as E2K?
I am attempting to design a Exchnage solution that inculdes firewall rules. I found a paper on E2K but no 5.5. Any help? Can I use this? -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E5.5 connections same as E2K?
Before you go any farther: OWA or VPN. There, your solution is complete. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E5.5 connections same as E2K? I am attempting to design a Exchnage solution that inculdes firewall rules. I found a paper on E2K but no 5.5. Any help? Can I use this? -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Intranet
www.cdolive.com Oh, and what version of Exchange are we talking about here? D When you choose your friends, don't be short-changed by choosing personality over character. -W. Somerset Maugham -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and Intranet I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward on? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Intranet
5.5 or 2k: with 2kl that is all built into AD for you. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and Intranet I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward on? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Intranet
Gentlemen Ladies: Setup: One IMS, One Bridgehead, Three mailbox servers, One OWA Server. All servers are Windows 2000 Sp2. IMS, mailbox servers and bridgehead are Exchange 5.5 SP4+3, OWA is Exchange 5.5 SP4+2. Problem: I think I have my first major problem with the Event Store. Got the following messages in my Event Log: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcProcessSearchMessageEvent Error: 0x8004011b Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcCreateLink Error: 0x8004011b I have searched the MS Exchange KB, but come up blank. Everything references EcGenerate, EcGet or EcDo functions. Nothing matches exactly. I figured I would run the isinteg.exe with the following switches: ISInteg -pri -fix -test alltests Suggestions? Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Store Problems???
Sorry...forgot to change the subject before sending last time...my apologies. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:55 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet Gentlemen Ladies: Setup: One IMS, One Bridgehead, Three mailbox servers, One OWA Server. All servers are Windows 2000 Sp2. IMS, mailbox servers and bridgehead are Exchange 5.5 SP4+3, OWA is Exchange 5.5 SP4+2. Problem: I think I have my first major problem with the Event Store. Got the following messages in my Event Log: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcProcessSearchMessageEvent Error: 0x8004011b Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcCreateLink Error: 0x8004011b I have searched the MS Exchange KB, but come up blank. Everything references EcGenerate, EcGet or EcDo functions. Nothing matches exactly. I figured I would run the isinteg.exe with the following switches: ISInteg -pri -fix -test alltests Suggestions? Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Intranet
Then check out CDOLive... Otherwise, you may want to wait until to finish your AD upgrade, upgrade to E2K and then use the AD features Kevin speaks of. D When you choose your friends, don't be short-changed by choosing personality over character. -W. Somerset Maugham -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet 5.5 for now I'm in the middle of moving to AD PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet 5.5 or 2k: with 2kl that is all built into AD for you. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE, CKST -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and Intranet I'm helping to build the intranet for our company and I'm looking to have the personnel Data (Phone Numbers, Direct Reports, Etc..) pulled from Exchange. Does anyone have any recommendations or examples they may be able to forward on? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ One is glad to be of service ---Robin Williams ( Millennium Man)--- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange
Come on people, do you see the :) at the end of the sentence? It was sarcasm... I was trying to be humorous, I figured no one would believe such an outlandish story, obviously I was wrong... Sorry... -cm -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I had a #$%#$% step dad that was like that. One time, the combustive properties of helium came up in our conversation (don't ask me why). He insisted that helium was a combustible gas. I told him he was wrong and eventually had to break out the Funk Wagnall's to prove it. The very first sentence under Helium stated, of course, that it was, in fact, a non-combustible gas. His response was (I'll never forget), How old is that encyclopedia? What a moron! Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Craig Manske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Sorry our admin proxys out microsoft.com, he says since they're criminals he rates their site right up there with hacking and porn sites. :) -cm -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Gee, ever been to www.microsoft.com/exchange ? If a trainstation is where the train stops, what's a workstation...? -Anon -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Don where all the white papers at!! -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange I dont have a big enough tape drive to do a full back this suxs -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Personally I backup EVERYTHING on the Exch server -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup exec 8.5 for exchange Hello All, I have backup exec 8.5 with exchange client installed on a NT Server SP6. I would like to know if I have to back up the exchange directories located under the c drive. Because I have exchange agent installed and I tell it to back it up Full I should be backing these directories up allready right. So if I go under selections can I uncheck the exchsrvr diectory and still backup this IS. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E5.5 connections same as E2K?
I hear you, . . . but before you preach the gospel to me let me just tell you, it's not what you think. I need it for a client connection over a WAN. I know a bad idea, but I really have no say, it's a done deal and they are paying $. I just need to know what is used for Outlook clients to connect and OWA. Setup: 2 exchange servers 200 users over a WAN (Frame) OLK2K 98. I need to separate the traffic, OLK and inbound mail traffic. Thanks, -John Q - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:16 PM Subject: RE: E5.5 connections same as E2K? Before you go any farther: OWA or VPN. There, your solution is complete. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E5.5 connections same as E2K? I am attempting to design a Exchnage solution that inculdes firewall rules. I found a paper on E2K but no 5.5. Any help? Can I use this? -John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store Problems???
Don, I did exactly that, and got seven hits on my query. However, like I said at the bottom of my message, none of them fit the description of my error message. I have checked the disk space on the server like Q196217 suggested, but it's fine. I also checked to make sure that I hadn't turned up the logging on something to maximum by accident and forgotten about it. Jim B. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Problems??? Go here http://search.support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx and query on Event ID 1025. Looks like you need to run ISINTEG... D Hazards: There is an Island of Opportunity in the middle of every difficulty, miss that, though, and you're pretty much doomed. - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Problems??? Sorry...forgot to change the subject before sending last time...my apologies. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:55 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet Gentlemen Ladies: Setup: One IMS, One Bridgehead, Three mailbox servers, One OWA Server. All servers are Windows 2000 Sp2. IMS, mailbox servers and bridgehead are Exchange 5.5 SP4+3, OWA is Exchange 5.5 SP4+2. Problem: I think I have my first major problem with the Event Store. Got the following messages in my Event Log: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcProcessSearchMessageEvent Error: 0x8004011b Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcCreateLink Error: 0x8004011b I have searched the MS Exchange KB, but come up blank. Everything references EcGenerate, EcGet or EcDo functions. Nothing matches exactly. I figured I would run the isinteg.exe with the following switches: ISInteg -pri -fix -test alltests Suggestions? Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store Problems???
I would still run ISINTEG and see if it finds any problems. Don't have it do any fixes, just run it and see what the IS looks like. D BSD Skunks the Penguin - Roger Seielstad -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Problems??? Don, I did exactly that, and got seven hits on my query. However, like I said at the bottom of my message, none of them fit the description of my error message. I have checked the disk space on the server like Q196217 suggested, but it's fine. I also checked to make sure that I hadn't turned up the logging on something to maximum by accident and forgotten about it. Jim B. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Problems??? Go here http://search.support.microsoft.com/search/default.aspx and query on Event ID 1025. Looks like you need to run ISINTEG... D Hazards: There is an Island of Opportunity in the middle of every difficulty, miss that, though, and you're pretty much doomed. - http://www.despair.com -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Problems??? Sorry...forgot to change the subject before sending last time...my apologies. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:55 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Exchange and Intranet Gentlemen Ladies: Setup: One IMS, One Bridgehead, Three mailbox servers, One OWA Server. All servers are Windows 2000 Sp2. IMS, mailbox servers and bridgehead are Exchange 5.5 SP4+3, OWA is Exchange 5.5 SP4+2. Problem: I think I have my first major problem with the Event Store. Got the following messages in my Event Log: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcProcessSearchMessageEvent Error: 0x8004011b Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeIS Private Event Category: General Event ID: 1025 Date: 12/27/2001 Time: 2:06:23 PM User: N/A Computer: ERCEX06 Description: An error occurred. Function name or description of problem: EcCreateLink Error: 0x8004011b I have searched the MS Exchange KB, but come up blank. Everything references EcGenerate, EcGet or EcDo functions. Nothing matches exactly. I figured I would run the isinteg.exe with the following switches: ISInteg -pri -fix -test alltests Suggestions? Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Uninstall
I am looking for a way to remove completely all files and all registry entrees from a failed exchange 5.5 install on a 2000 machine that is in an active directory environment. What happens is the install goes fine, but just as it starts to replicate, it fails. The error is the System Attendant can't find the file specified. But no listing as to what the file is. I don't want to rebuild this server just because it is a pain. What happen, is a tech had a bad Exchange CD. She borrowed mine, and didn't throw her's away. Guess which CD she gave me back and thought was mine. Her bad one. So I am looking for documentation on all regentries, locations of all files so I can manually remove this thing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Uninstall
Why aren't you just re-burning the box? You didn't do this to a DC, did you? Did you try using the remove all option? What result? Tom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Uninstall I am looking for a way to remove completely all files and all registry entrees from a failed exchange 5.5 install on a 2000 machine that is in an active directory environment. What happens is the install goes fine, but just as it starts to replicate, it fails. The error is the System Attendant can't find the file specified. But no listing as to what the file is. I don't want to rebuild this server just because it is a pain. What happen, is a tech had a bad Exchange CD. She borrowed mine, and didn't throw her's away. Guess which CD she gave me back and thought was mine. Her bad one. So I am looking for documentation on all regentries, locations of all files so I can manually remove this thing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information Store Problems???
Don, Here are the results: Microsoft Exchange Information Store Integrity Checker v5.5.2654.62 Copyright (c) 1986-1997 Microsoft Corp.All rights reserved. Started:12/27/01 16:31:35 Server name: ercex06.erc.rl.gov Store path: F:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB Store size: 7952408576 bytes Output log: isinteg.pri Check mode: check only Options: -pri -verbose -test alltests Starting test 1 of 20, 'Search Folder Links' Finished Search Folder Links. Time: 0h:0m:11s Starting test 2 of 20, 'Global' Finished Global, number of rows = 1. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 3 of 20, 'Delivered To' Finished Delivered To, number of rows = 274. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 4 of 20, 'Search Queue' Finished Search Queue. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 5 of 20, 'Timed Events' Timed event are : Expiration = 22, Finished Timed Events, number of rows = 22. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 6 of 20, 'reference table construction' Finished reference table construction. Time: 1h:33m:33s Starting test 7 of 20, 'Folder' Warning: MsgFolder 323 (Fid=0001-00DB2E4E, Mid=0001-00DB73AE, Inid=0001-00DA3CCA): PR_READ_RECEIPT_REQUESTED(0029000B) prop in Messages table and MsgFolder table do not match. Warning: MsgFolder 324 (Fid=0001-00DB2E4E, Mid=0001-00DB73AF, Inid=0001-00D9F53D): PR_READ_RECEIPT_REQUESTED(0029000B) prop in Messages table and MsgFolder table do not match. Warning: MsgFolder 325 (Fid=0001-00DB2E4E, Mid=0001-00DB73B0, Inid=0001-00D73AE4): PR_READ_RECEIPT_REQUESTED(0029000B) prop in Messages table and MsgFolder table do not match. Error: MsgFolder 36 (Fid=0005-00B9E188, Mid=0001-00083F8B, Inid=0001-0119BF24): GetProp of 80010003 from MsgFolder Table returned ecNotFound-MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND . Warning: MsgFolder 36 (Fid=0005-00B9E188, Mid=0001-00083F8B, Inid=0001-0119BF24): 80010003 prop in Messages table and MsgFolder table do not match. Finished Folder, number of rows = 11793. Time: 0h:34m:56s, number of errors = 1, number of warnings = 4 Starting test 8 of 20, 'Deleted Folders' Finished Deleted Folders. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 9 of 20, 'Message' Warning: Message 434359 (Inid=002B-00A00912): Magic value missing from PR_RTF_Compressed Header Warning: Message 434359 (Inid=002B-00A00912): This message contains incorrect RTF Finished Message, number of rows = 449465. Time: 0h:8m:17s, number of warnings = 2 Starting test 10 of 20, 'Attachment' Finished Attachment, number of rows = 216656. Time: 0h:2m:4s Starting test 11 of 20, 'Mailbox' Finished Mailbox, number of rows = 401. Time: 0h:0m:4s Starting test 12 of 20, 'Receive Folder' Finished Receive Folder, number of rows = 1604. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 13 of 20, 'ACL Member' Finished ACL Member, number of rows = 167. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 14 of 20, 'ACL List' Finished ACL List, number of rows = 447. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 15 of 20, 'Oof History' Finished Oof History, number of rows = 421. Time: 0h:0m:1s Starting test 16 of 20, 'Per-User Read' Finished Per-User Read, number of rows = 639. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 17 of 20, 'special folders' Finished special folders. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 18 of 20, 'Message Tombstone' Finished Message Tombstone, number of rows = 2550. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 19 of 20, 'Folder Tombstone' Finished Folder Tombstone. Time: 0h:0m:0s Starting test 20 of 20, 'reference count verification' Finished reference count verification. Time: 0h:10m:52s The Information Store has been shut down clean. Hence disabling the Row Count/Dumpster Count test. Specify -test rowcounts (or) -test dumpsterref explicitly to run this test . . . . . SUMMARY . . . . . Total number of tests : 20 Total number of warnings : 6 Total number of errors : 1 Total number of fixes : 0 Total time : 2h:30m:2s I think Test #6 took so long because I bumped the keyboard. I left it for the amount of time that it took, and finally hit CTRL-C and forced it to the next test. I'll rerun the individual test in the morning. Jim -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Problems??? I would still run ISINTEG and see if it finds any problems. Don't have it do any fixes, just run it and see what the IS looks like. D BSD Skunks the Penguin - Roger Seielstad -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Problems??? Don, I did exactly that, and got seven hits on my query. However, like I said at the bottom of my message, none of them fit the description of my error message. I have checked the disk space on the server like Q196217 suggested, but it's fine. I also checked to make sure that I hadn't turned up the logging on something to maximum by accident and forgotten about it. Jim B.
RE: Deleting Empty ABV's
I have tried logging on as the service account but that didnt work either. (Is that what you meant ?) As a strange side effect, i have built a test server without Ex SP4 and restored from our live system and it worked. As soon as i done the SP upgrade it stopped working ! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deleting Empty ABV's Logged on as Administrator, or an Exchange administrator? You need to be the later. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Deleting Empty ABV's [Darren Ash] I need to delete some emptry address book views but when i try I am told i do not have permission. Logged in as Administrator, NT4, SP6, Ex 5.5 (SP4). Any ideas anyone ? Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831411 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
