[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-25 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 And to be caught up in revulsion towards your own genitals 
 is even stranger.  I find it very revealing that many in the TMO
 refer to the genitals as if they are something out there, and
 the phrase is usually accompanied with body language of 
 distinct distaste.  Sort of on the same level as talking about
 a particularly smelly bag of garbage...
 
 To revile an essential part of your body is remarkably foolsih,
 IMO, and unfortunately very widespread in the TMO.  So much
 revulsion over such a long period of time cannot be healthy.

Yoga-suutra II 40

shaucaat svaanga-jugupsaa parair asaMsargaH

Taimni's translation:

From physical[that word seems like Taimni's addition]
purity (arises) disgust for one's
own body and disinclination to come in physical
contact with others.

Because the above Sanskrit sentence feels somehow
elliptic (I for one would expect at least the conjunct
'ca' at the end), it seems the sentence actually continues
in the next suutra:

sattva-shuddhi-saumanasyaikaagryendriyajayaatma-darshana-
yogyatvaani ca. [without sandhi: sattva-shuddhi;saumanasya;
ekaagrya; indriya-jaya; aatma-darshana-yogyatvaani ca]

Taimni:

From mental purity[not in the original suutra] (arises)
purity of /sattva/, cheerful-mindedness, one-pointedness,
control of the senses and fitness for the vision of the Self.



 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
  [...]
   Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
   movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
   They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
   genitals is such a strange thing!
   
  
  Let me tell you the old Native American story about Long-Cock Man 
and 
  Tooth-Vagina Woman...




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-25 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
  but eventually, she whittled him 
  down 
   to a size that she could handle and he knocked out all her teeth.
   
   They lived happily ever after...
  
  ROTFL!
 
 Isn't that a great story? I have no idea if its a real Indian story 
 or not, but it's got such a ring of truth to it...

I told it to my son. He said the moral was: find your niche and fill 
it...





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread Cliff
Or wake up and realize that this segregation is just another method
of control.  Humans are essentially very sexy creatures - shutting
off one of the greatest sources of spiritual development and inner
power is a very effective way to exert control.

This is seen both in the sexual yes / no that happens in a
relationship and in the mind/energy control that many gurus
exert by making their disciples feel guilty about their desires.

Wake up!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
If they only have one dining hall who gets to eat first?
   
   That's the question. 
   Ingegerd
  
  Put up a curtain?
 
 Or - put on a burka.
 Ingegerd
  
  


The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified TM-
Teachers, who is men,  can only teach men and recert. TM-
 Teachers 
that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and week-
 end-
courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do 
 not 
know if they can use same dining-hall.
Ingegerd

   





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread Cliff
And to be caught up in revulsion towards your own genitals 
is even stranger.  I find it very revealing that many in the TMO
refer to the genitals as if they are something out there, and
the phrase is usually accompanied with body language of 
distinct distaste.  Sort of on the same level as talking about
a particularly smelly bag of garbage...

To revile an essential part of your body is remarkably foolsih,
IMO, and unfortunately very widespread in the TMO.  So much
revulsion over such a long period of time cannot be healthy.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
 [...]
  Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
  movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
  They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
  genitals is such a strange thing!
  
 
 Let me tell you the old Native American story about Long-Cock Man and 
 Tooth-Vagina Woman...




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 To revile an essential part of your body is remarkably foolsih,
 IMO, and unfortunately very widespread in the TMO.  So much
 revulsion over such a long period of time cannot be healthy.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
  [...]
   Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
   movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
   They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
   genitals is such a strange thing!
   
  
  Let me tell you the old Native American story about Long-Cock Man 
and 
  Tooth-Vagina Woman...
 And to be caught up in revulsion towards your own genitals 
 is even stranger.  I find it very revealing that many in the TMO
 refer to the genitals as if they are something out there, and
 the phrase is usually accompanied with body language of 
 distinct distaste.  Sort of on the same level as talking about
 a particularly smelly bag of garbage...
 

And who says it is always revulsion?

And no-one asked about the old Native American tale about Long-Cock 
Man and Tooth-Vagina Woman...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip And no-one asked about the old Native American tale about Long-
 Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina Woman...

Tell us, O Sparaig, about Long-Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina woman.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip And no-one asked about the old Native American tale about 
Long-
  Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina Woman...
 
 Tell us, O Sparaig, about Long-Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina woman.

This was told at a World Fantasy Convention by an American Indian 
author as a way of illustrating how censored white's views of American 
Indians are (I've been told that some Indian tribes would consider this 
story terribly offensive while others wouldn't blink an eye):

Once there was a man whose cock was far too long for any woman. Any 
woman who attempted to have relations with him would suffer terribly 
though many tried.

Once there was a woman whose vagina was lined with teeth, and any man 
who tried to be with her would lose his manhood.

One day both were wandering in the forest and came upon each other and 
passion took them. At first, it was rather unpleasant with teeth and 
bits of cock flying everywhere, but eventually, she whittled him down 
to a size that she could handle and he knocked out all her teeth.

They lived happily ever after...







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  snip And no-one asked about the old Native American tale about 
 Long-
   Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina Woman...
  
  Tell us, O Sparaig, about Long-Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina woman.
 
 This was told at a World Fantasy Convention by an American Indian 
 author as a way of illustrating how censored white's views of 
American 
 Indians are (I've been told that some Indian tribes would consider 
this 
 story terribly offensive while others wouldn't blink an eye):
 
 Once there was a man whose cock was far too long for any woman. Any 
 woman who attempted to have relations with him would suffer 
terribly 
 though many tried.
 
 Once there was a woman whose vagina was lined with teeth, and any 
man 
 who tried to be with her would lose his manhood.
 
 One day both were wandering in the forest and came upon each other 
and 
 passion took them. At first, it was rather unpleasant with teeth 
and 
 bits of cock flying everywhere, but eventually, she whittled him 
down 
 to a size that she could handle and he knocked out all her teeth.
 
 They lived happily ever after...

ROTFL!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 but eventually, she whittled him 
 down 
  to a size that she could handle and he knocked out all her teeth.
  
  They lived happily ever after...
 
 ROTFL!

Isn't that a great story? I have no idea if its a real Indian story 
or not, but it's got such a ring of truth to it...




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
   but eventually, she whittled him down to a size
   that she could handle and he knocked out all her teeth.
   
   They lived happily ever after...
  
  ROTFL!
 
 Isn't that a great story? I have no idea if its a real Indian
 story or not, but it's got such a ring of truth to it...

If it isn't, it should be.

Probably more of life's problems than we realize
are along the same lines and could be as neatly 
solved.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread anonymousff
Maharishi was a master at creating conflict and guilt regading sex. He
would come to men's courses and extol the virtues of celibacy then go
to the ladies courses and talk about how they should be married. 
He would talk very very down to people who were in relationships.
A dear friend of mine who lived on/worked on M's wing in Europe, with
his wife (they ended up divorced) said M was very, very denigrating to
couples even though he had them working directly for him. He would
frequently have them each working on separate projects, never able to
see each other, and it they complained to him that they never got to
see their spouse, he, Maharishi, would really put them down in his
response, tell them to make a choice. 

I remember him really putting Chris Wege down in India just before
Chris had a vedic wedding ceremony choreographed by Maharishi. But
before it happened-the wedding-although Maharishi never used anyone's
name in a massive put down of couples and marriage, it was clear he
was putting someone down and then Chris's wedding came right after the
put down.

I know there were many other instances of Maharishi putting
couples-relationships-sex down that I personally heard and experienced
and it did alter my life.

A friend of mine, long time pro TM guy, ardent devotee for almost 40
years now, who had a nervous breakdown years ago after wrestling with
the guilt of being married and the whole sex thing, in a final
stroke, just before finally being committed (and subsequently making
a complete recovery) tried to slice his testicles and other male
equupment off. That's how guilty some people became.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And to be caught up in revulsion towards your own genitals 
 is even stranger.  I find it very revealing that many in the TMO
 refer to the genitals as if they are something out there, and
 the phrase is usually accompanied with body language of 
 distinct distaste.  Sort of on the same level as talking about
 a particularly smelly bag of garbage...
 
 To revile an essential part of your body is remarkably foolsih,
 IMO, and unfortunately very widespread in the TMO.  So much
 revulsion over such a long period of time cannot be healthy.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
  [...]
   Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
   movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
   They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
   genitals is such a strange thing!
   
  
  Let me tell you the old Native American story about Long-Cock Man and 
  Tooth-Vagina Woman...




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Maharishi was a master at creating conflict and guilt regading 
sex. He
 would come to men's courses and extol the virtues of celibacy then 
go
 to the ladies courses and talk about how they should be married. 
 He would talk very very down to people who were in relationships.
 A dear friend of mine who lived on/worked on M's wing in Europe, 
with
 his wife (they ended up divorced) said M was very, very 
denigrating to
 couples even though he had them working directly for him. He would
 frequently have them each working on separate projects, never able 
to
 see each other, and it they complained to him that they never got 
to
 see their spouse, he, Maharishi, would really put them down in his
 response, tell them to make a choice. 
 
 I remember him really putting Chris Wege down in India just before
 Chris had a vedic wedding ceremony choreographed by Maharishi. But
 before it happened-the wedding-although Maharishi never used 
anyone's
 name in a massive put down of couples and marriage, it was clear he
 was putting someone down and then Chris's wedding came right after 
the
 put down.
 
 I know there were many other instances of Maharishi putting
 couples-relationships-sex down that I personally heard and 
experienced
 and it did alter my life.
 
 A friend of mine, long time pro TM guy, ardent devotee for almost 
40
 years now, who had a nervous breakdown years ago after wrestling 
with
 the guilt of being married and the whole sex thing, in a final
 stroke, just before finally being committed (and subsequently 
making
 a complete recovery) tried to slice his testicles and other male
 equupment off. That's how guilty some people became.


As tragic as that is, any act we commit, we own. It is ours alone. I 
sincerely hope he is happier now.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-24 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  snip And no-one asked about the old Native American tale 
about 
 Long-
   Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina Woman...
  
  Tell us, O Sparaig, about Long-Cock Man and Tooth-Vagina woman.
 
 This was told at a World Fantasy Convention by an American Indian 
 author as a way of illustrating how censored white's views of 
American 
 Indians are (I've been told that some Indian tribes would consider 
this 
 story terribly offensive while others wouldn't blink an eye):
 
 Once there was a man whose cock was far too long for any woman. 
Any 
 woman who attempted to have relations with him would suffer 
terribly 
 though many tried.
 
 Once there was a woman whose vagina was lined with teeth, and any 
man 
 who tried to be with her would lose his manhood.
 
 One day both were wandering in the forest and came upon each other 
and 
 passion took them. At first, it was rather unpleasant with teeth 
and 
 bits of cock flying everywhere, but eventually, she whittled him 
down 
 to a size that she could handle and he knocked out all her teeth.
 
 They lived happily ever after...

Christ, that's a good story.

lurk




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Peter Sutphen


--- Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
If they only have one dining hall who gets to
 eat first?
   
   That's the question. 
   Ingegerd
  
  Put up a curtain?
 
 Or - put on a burka.
 Ingegerd

Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
genitals is such a strange thing!



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 --- Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
 If they only have one dining hall who gets to
  eat first?

That's the question. 
Ingegerd
   
   Put up a curtain?
  
  Or - put on a burka.
  Ingegerd
 
 Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
 movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
 They don't bite, do they? 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagina_dentata

Alex





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 --- Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
 If they only have one dining hall who gets to
  eat first?

That's the question. 
Ingegerd
   
   Put up a curtain?
  
  Or - put on a burka.
  Ingegerd
 
 Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
 movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
 They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
 genitals is such a strange thing!


S C A R E D

 of the

S A C R E D

:-)




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 --- Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
 If they only have one dining hall who gets to
  eat first?

That's the question. 
Ingegerd
   
   Put up a curtain?
  
  Or - put on a burka.
  Ingegerd
 
 Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
 movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
 They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
 genitals is such a strange thing!

You don't have to wonder any more. Conny Larssons book is for sale, 
telling what happens when men and women is gathered in the same 
place. I have not read the book. But it has send some waves of chock 
among the Sidhas in Norway, probably in the whole Scandinavia. 
Ingegerd

 
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
  Or - put on a burka.
  Ingegerd
 
 Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
 movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
 They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
 genitals is such a strange thing!

When my then-boyfriend and I took our flying block
at MIU, I was initially very scornful of and pissed
off by the separation of men and women, even for
the lectures.

A week or so into the course, after we'd been
flying for a while, I was walking with the women
from my pod to the dining hall when we encountered
some men one of them knew, and we stopped to chat.

At that point the only man I'd spent any time with
at all was my boyfriend; we'd sneak quick meetings
every now and then to compare notes on our
experiences (he was having a very tough time with
unstressing; I wasn't).

Anyway, to my astonishment and consternation--and
unlike when I was with my boyfriend--I found I was
extremely uncomfortable in the men's presence; I
could hardly wait to get away.  They were perfectly
nice guys, gentlemanly, not raucous, but there was
something about their vibe--can't think of any
other way to describe it--that was very disturbing
to the vibe I was experiencing at the time.  Not a
*bad* vibe per se, just one that was strongly
incompatible with mine.

This was a completely gut reaction, like, say, a
fingernail on a blackboard, just jarring.  My
women course buddies and I hadn't talked about men
vs. women, and we hadn't gotten any explanation
about why men and women were separated on the
course; and as I say, I'd been highly scornful of
it to start with.  So it must have been a very
innocent response on my part.

Unless it was a function of unstressing, but I
wasn't noticeably unstressing otherwise, and it was
so specific to this particular situation.  I hadn't
felt it with my boyfriend, but we were extremely
close and very attuned to each other.

Bottom line, I've never again objected to the
separation of men and women on courses or in group
program.  Whatever other sexism there is in the
movement, I don't think this has anything to do
with it.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified TM-
   Teachers, who is men,  can only teach men and recert. TM-Teachers 
   that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and week-end-
   courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do 
 not 
   know if they can use same dining-hall.
   Ingegerd
  
  Which is a problem ifthere is only one TM teacher in town. Hence 
 they 
  are encouraging husband and wife teams. Dennise Denniston-Gerace's 
  husband will be joining her team soon, I understand...
  
  BTW, while seperation of sexes for education sounds wierd to 
 Westerners 
  (at least in the 20th century), there's plenty of research showing 
 that 
  it can be beneficial, at least for women -at least in school. 
 Perhaps 
  there ARE female-only issues that are best dealt with by females, 
 and 
  likewise with males when it comes to teaching TM?
 
 This separation between teaching men and women has some funny side-
 effects. People who has learned TM from recert. TM-Teachers turn to 
 me ( an independent TM-Teacher) to get following-up, because they are 
 not satisfied with the following-up in the TMO - and the recert. TM-
 Teacher is very few and not available. In Norway it is one female 
 recert. TM-Teacher.
 Ingegerd

Ingegerd, 

What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps to keep
people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.

JohnY




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Ingegerd
 
 What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps to keep
 people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.
 
 JohnY

The official price is 2.500 Dollar. The TMO has one TM-Center - a 
combination of Ayur-Vedic Clinic and Academy - where people comes for 
Pancha-Karma, and some of them start with TM in the 5-7 days where they 
are in the Academy. 
Before the recert. courses - it was several TM-Teacher around the 
country - that could do the following-up after the students left the 
Academy.
Now, it is almost none. And only 1 female recert. TM-Teacher. So many 
of the new meditators (not that many I think) is very disappointed 
about the following-up. And that is why some takes contact with me -. 
They find me on the Internet - or through other channels.
Ingegerd





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps to keep
  people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.
  
  JohnY
 
 The official price is 2.500 Dollar. The TMO has one TM-Center - a 
 combination of Ayur-Vedic Clinic and Academy - where people comes for 
 Pancha-Karma, and some of them start with TM in the 5-7 days where they 
 are in the Academy. 
 Before the recert. courses - it was several TM-Teacher around the 
 country - that could do the following-up after the students left the 
 Academy.
 Now, it is almost none. And only 1 female recert. TM-Teacher. So many 
 of the new meditators (not that many I think) is very disappointed 
 about the following-up. And that is why some takes contact with me -. 
 They find me on the Internet - or through other channels.
 Ingegerd



In recent posts where I have asserted that the only real hope for the purity of 
the teaching 
lies outside the organization, this is exactly what I had in mind. 

L B S




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps to 
keep
   people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.
   
   JohnY
  
  The official price is 2.500 Dollar. The TMO has one TM-Center - a 
  combination of Ayur-Vedic Clinic and Academy - where people comes 
for 
  Pancha-Karma, and some of them start with TM in the 5-7 days 
where they 
  are in the Academy. 
  Before the recert. courses - it was several TM-Teacher around the 
  country - that could do the following-up after the students left 
the 
  Academy.
  Now, it is almost none. And only 1 female recert. TM-Teacher. So 
many 
  of the new meditators (not that many I think) is very 
disappointed 
  about the following-up. And that is why some takes contact with 
me -. 
  They find me on the Internet - or through other channels.
  Ingegerd
 
 
 
 In recent posts where I have asserted that the only real hope for 
the purity of the teaching 
 lies outside the organization, this is exactly what I had in mind. 
 
 L B S

I think you are right. We are a few Independent TM-Teachers in 
Norway, and we are very much alert to keep the purity in our 
teaching, and more relaxed about money than the TMO. Other ex-TM-
Teachers outside and inside the TMO, is looking over our shoulders 
all the time, ready to knock us down, if we do something they think 
are wrong. Another big difference is - we cannot lean on an 
organisation - we have to be self-supporting. We are the one who 
are responsible for what we are doing.
I have met the same among other Independent TM-Teachers in other 
countries through the European Network. They are really serious about 
what they are doing.
Ingegerd




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps to 
 keep
people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.

JohnY
   
   The official price is 2.500 Dollar. The TMO has one TM-Center - a 
   combination of Ayur-Vedic Clinic and Academy - where people comes 
 for 
   Pancha-Karma, and some of them start with TM in the 5-7 days 
 where they 
   are in the Academy. 
   Before the recert. courses - it was several TM-Teacher around the 
   country - that could do the following-up after the students left 
 the 
   Academy.
   Now, it is almost none. And only 1 female recert. TM-Teacher. So 
 many 
   of the new meditators (not that many I think) is very 
 disappointed 
   about the following-up. And that is why some takes contact with 
 me -. 
   They find me on the Internet - or through other channels.
   Ingegerd
  
  
  
  In recent posts where I have asserted that the only real hope for 
 the purity of the teaching 
  lies outside the organization, this is exactly what I had in mind. 
  
  L B S
 
 I think you are right. We are a few Independent TM-Teachers in 
 Norway, and we are very much alert to keep the purity in our 
 teaching, and more relaxed about money than the TMO. Other ex-TM-
 Teachers outside and inside the TMO, is looking over our shoulders 
 all the time, ready to knock us down, if we do something they think 
 are wrong. Another big difference is - we cannot lean on an 
 organisation - we have to be self-supporting. We are the one who 
 are responsible for what we are doing.
 I have met the same among other Independent TM-Teachers in other 
 countries through the European Network. They are really serious about 
 what they are doing.
 Ingegerd



From time to time the idea gets floated that independants should form an 
alternate 
organization, focused only on maintaining teaching standards. That is, it would 
be 
concerned only with the instructional aspects of TM teaching, a resource for 
teachers to 
help them be confident that they are passing the technique along in the manner 
they 
received it.

Although this idea seems quite popular, it will clearly not manifest until 
Maharishi has 
passed. No one wants to upset or offend him, even though many feel he has made 
some 
critical mistakes in his marketing plan.

L B S




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps 
to 
  keep
 people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.
 
 JohnY

The official price is 2.500 Dollar. The TMO has one TM-
Center - a 
combination of Ayur-Vedic Clinic and Academy - where people 
comes 
  for 
Pancha-Karma, and some of them start with TM in the 5-7 days 
  where they 
are in the Academy. 
Before the recert. courses - it was several TM-Teacher around 
the 
country - that could do the following-up after the students 
left 
  the 
Academy.
Now, it is almost none. And only 1 female recert. TM-Teacher. 
So 
  many 
of the new meditators (not that many I think) is very 
  disappointed 
about the following-up. And that is why some takes contact 
with 
  me -. 
They find me on the Internet - or through other channels.
Ingegerd
   
   
   
   In recent posts where I have asserted that the only real hope 
for 
  the purity of the teaching 
   lies outside the organization, this is exactly what I had in 
mind. 
   
   L B S
  
  I think you are right. We are a few Independent TM-Teachers in 
  Norway, and we are very much alert to keep the purity in our 
  teaching, and more relaxed about money than the TMO. Other ex-TM-
  Teachers outside and inside the TMO, is looking over our 
shoulders 
  all the time, ready to knock us down, if we do something they 
think 
  are wrong. Another big difference is - we cannot lean on an 
  organisation - we have to be self-supporting. We are the one 
who 
  are responsible for what we are doing.
  I have met the same among other Independent TM-Teachers in other 
  countries through the European Network. They are really serious 
about 
  what they are doing.
  Ingegerd
 
 
 
 From time to time the idea gets floated that independants should 
form an alternate 
 organization, focused only on maintaining teaching standards. That 
is, it would be 
 concerned only with the instructional aspects of TM teaching, a 
resource for teachers to 
 help them be confident that they are passing the technique along in 
the manner they 
 received it.
 
 Although this idea seems quite popular, it will clearly not 
manifest until Maharishi has 
 passed. No one wants to upset or offend him, even though many feel 
he has made some 
 critical mistakes in his marketing plan.
 
 L B S

If somebody start something like that - only focusing on the 
teaching - I am in.
Ingegerd




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 From time to time the idea gets floated that independants should 
form an alternate 
 organization, focused only on maintaining teaching standards. That 
is, it would be 
 concerned only with the instructional aspects of TM teaching, a 
resource for teachers to 
 help them be confident that they are passing the technique along in 
the manner they 
 received it.

Such a group would at some point have to start
thinking about running teacher training courses
to make new teachers, no?  Maybe not for a while
yet, but eventually.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 snip
  From time to time the idea gets floated that independants should 
 form an alternate 
  organization, focused only on maintaining teaching standards. That 
 is, it would be 
  concerned only with the instructional aspects of TM teaching, a 
 resource for teachers to 
  help them be confident that they are passing the technique along in 
 the manner they 
  received it.
 
 Such a group would at some point have to start
 thinking about running teacher training courses
 to make new teachers, no?  Maybe not for a while
 yet, but eventually.

Making new teachers regionally was part of the original World Plan.

JohnY





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps 
to 
  keep
 people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.
 
 JohnY

The official price is 2.500 Dollar. The TMO has one TM-
Center - a 
combination of Ayur-Vedic Clinic and Academy - where people 
comes 
  for 
Pancha-Karma, and some of them start with TM in the 5-7 days 
  where they 
are in the Academy. 
Before the recert. courses - it was several TM-Teacher 
around the 
country - that could do the following-up after the students 
left 
  the 
Academy.
Now, it is almost none. And only 1 female recert. TM-
Teacher. So 
  many 
of the new meditators (not that many I think) is very 
  disappointed 
about the following-up. And that is why some takes contact 
with 
  me -. 
They find me on the Internet - or through other channels.
Ingegerd
   
   
   
   In recent posts where I have asserted that the only real hope 
for 
  the purity of the teaching 
   lies outside the organization, this is exactly what I had in 
mind. 
   
   L B S
  
  I think you are right. We are a few Independent TM-Teachers in 
  Norway, and we are very much alert to keep the purity in our 
  teaching, and more relaxed about money than the TMO. Other ex-
TM-
  Teachers outside and inside the TMO, is looking over our 
shoulders 
  all the time, ready to knock us down, if we do something they 
think 
  are wrong. Another big difference is - we cannot lean on an 
  organisation - we have to be self-supporting. We are the one 
who 
  are responsible for what we are doing.
  I have met the same among other Independent TM-Teachers in other 
  countries through the European Network. They are really serious 
about 
  what they are doing.
  Ingegerd
 
 
 
 From time to time the idea gets floated that independants should 
form an alternate 
 organization, focused only on maintaining teaching standards. That 
is, it would be 
 concerned only with the instructional aspects of TM teaching, a 
resource for teachers to 
 help them be confident that they are passing the technique along 
in the manner they 
 received it.
 
 Although this idea seems quite popular, it will clearly not 
manifest until Maharishi has 
 passed. No one wants to upset or offend him, even though many feel 
he has made some 
 critical mistakes in his marketing plan.
 
 L B S

This may sound like a kooky idea but, hey, nothing would surprise me 
in the least when it comes to the TMO:

May I suggest that the very first thing that TM teachers teaching 
outside the movement should do who want to teach AND maintain the 
purity of the TM teaching is to approach MMY, tell him what they are 
doing, and ask his advice on what they can do to maintain the purity 
of the teaching.

Remember that MMY himself said in a recent press conference that 
(and I paraphrase) that there was still some value in learning TM 
from people teaching it outside the movement.

You know, MMY loves to oversee all the little details of everything 
and he loves to micro-manage organisations...perhaps he wouldn't be 
able to pass up the opportunity to micro-manage an organisation that 
Ex-TM Teachers sought to set up...




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
snip
 You know, MMY loves to oversee all the little details of everything 
 and he loves to micro-manage organisations...perhaps he wouldn't be 
 able to pass up the opportunity to micro-manage an organisation that 
 Ex-TM Teachers sought to set up...

Wondering offhand why this would necessarily be desirable :-)




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 snip
  You know, MMY loves to oversee all the little details of 
everything 
  and he loves to micro-manage organisations...perhaps he wouldn't 
be 
  able to pass up the opportunity to micro-manage an organisation 
that 
  Ex-TM Teachers sought to set up...
 
 Wondering offhand why this would necessarily be desirable :-)

Free advice...and the teachers would get the endorsement from MMY...




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
  snip
   You know, MMY loves to oversee all the little details of 
 everything 
   and he loves to micro-manage organisations...perhaps he 
wouldn't 
 be 
   able to pass up the opportunity to micro-manage an 
organisation 
 that 
   Ex-TM Teachers sought to set up...
  
  Wondering offhand why this would necessarily be desirable :-)
 
 Free advice...and the teachers would get the endorsement from 
MMY...

Ahh, I see -- you are assuming then that he would *not* be 
micromanaging the new organisation...? Because if you gave him that 
kind of leeway or authority, it would seem you'd be going right back 
to square one, repeating the same old patterns of the first org...:-)




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:
   snip
You know, MMY loves to oversee all the little details of 
  everything 
and he loves to micro-manage organisations...perhaps he 
 wouldn't 
  be 
able to pass up the opportunity to micro-manage an 
 organisation 
  that 
Ex-TM Teachers sought to set up...
   
   Wondering offhand why this would necessarily be desirable :-)
  
  Free advice...and the teachers would get the endorsement from 
 MMY...
 
 Ahh, I see -- you are assuming then that he would *not* be 
 micromanaging the new organisation...? Because if you gave him 
that 
 kind of leeway or authority, it would seem you'd be going right 
back 
 to square one, repeating the same old patterns of the first 
org...:-)

-): Good point.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 snip
  From time to time the idea gets floated that independants should 
 form an alternate 
  organization, focused only on maintaining teaching standards. That 
 is, it would be 
  concerned only with the instructional aspects of TM teaching, a 
 resource for teachers to 
  help them be confident that they are passing the technique along in 
 the manner they 
  received it.
 
 Such a group would at some point have to start
 thinking about running teacher training courses
 to make new teachers, no?  Maybe not for a while
 yet, but eventually.



Yes, and as I gather from conversations with others who share the interest, it 
would be 
done by consensus as to what and how. In other words, the old pros would sit 
together 
and hammer it out until everyone was satisfied that they had gotten it right.

L B S




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers): PS

2005-07-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It was common knowledge among students that manadatory attendance 
at the Dome 
  diminished enthusiasm for attendance. Your argument that a good 
kick in the backside 
  somehow will increase the positivity in students' attitudes 
towards group program no 
  doubt reflects the thinking of the administration as well. Is it 
any wonder the University 
 is 
  having such a hard time attracting—and keeping—students?
  
  L B S
 
 PS
 
 MORE IMPORTANT
 
 Diverting the attention from the sutra in any way interferes with 
the practice, as I have 
 understood it. Does anyone seriously believe that there is 
something better than simple, 
 natural, innocent in this regard?
 


I think obsessing about optimal conditions for sutra practice would 
be at least as detrimental as requiring someone to be present.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers): PS

2005-07-23 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It was common knowledge among students that manadatory attendance 
 at the Dome 
   diminished enthusiasm for attendance. Your argument that a good 
 kick in the backside 
   somehow will increase the positivity in students' attitudes 
 towards group program no 
   doubt reflects the thinking of the administration as well. Is it 
 any wonder the University 
  is 
   having such a hard time attracting—and keeping—students?
   
   L B S
  
  PS
  
  MORE IMPORTANT
  
  Diverting the attention from the sutra in any way interferes with 
 the practice, as I have 
  understood it. Does anyone seriously believe that there is 
 something better than simple, 
  natural, innocent in this regard?
  
 
 
 I think obsessing about optimal conditions for sutra practice would 
 be at least as detrimental as requiring someone to be present.



The beauty of this teaching, as I understood it when I became a teacher, was 
that it was 
not necessary for anyone to obsess about what constitutes optimal conditions 
for practice.  
Those things had been worked out, and the best way to mess it up would be to 
add 
something. Like, perhaps, a kick in the backside.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers): PS

2005-07-23 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 The beauty of this teaching, as I understood it when I became a 
teacher, was that it was 
 not necessary for anyone to obsess about what constitutes optimal 
conditions for practice.  
 Those things had been worked out, and the best way to mess it up 
would be to add 
 something. Like, perhaps, a kick in the backside.

Amen to that! Yes, I completely agree. The beauty about TM for me has 
always been its utter simplicity and versatility, and the complete 
independence of the practice from any group, unless one so chooses. 
Practice it anywhere- (except the US Congress, and while driving that 
is).




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
[...]
 Good one! I've always wondered why so many spiritual
 movements give such power to the penis and vagina.
 They don't bite, do they? To be in bondage to the
 genitals is such a strange thing!
 

Let me tell you the old Native American story about Long-Cock Man and 
Tooth-Vagina Woman...







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   What is the official price in Norway? Good followup helps to 
keep
   people going when their experience changes. Takes empathy.
   
   JohnY
  
  The official price is 2.500 Dollar. The TMO has one TM-Center - a 
  combination of Ayur-Vedic Clinic and Academy - where people comes 
for 
  Pancha-Karma, and some of them start with TM in the 5-7 days 
where they 
  are in the Academy. 
  Before the recert. courses - it was several TM-Teacher around the 
  country - that could do the following-up after the students left 
the 
  Academy.
  Now, it is almost none. And only 1 female recert. TM-Teacher. So 
many 
  of the new meditators (not that many I think) is very 
disappointed 
  about the following-up. And that is why some takes contact with 
me -. 
  They find me on the Internet - or through other channels.
  Ingegerd
 
 
 
 In recent posts where I have asserted that the only real hope for 
the purity of the teaching 
 lies outside the organization, this is exactly what I had in mind. 
 

So, the all-new TMorganization is what, a few months old and you're 
complaining about followup issues? Give it a year or 5.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers): PS

2005-07-23 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  The beauty of this teaching, as I understood it when I became a 
 teacher, was that it was 
  not necessary for anyone to obsess about what constitutes optimal 
 conditions for practice.  
  Those things had been worked out, and the best way to mess it up 
 would be to add 
  something. Like, perhaps, a kick in the backside.
 
 Amen to that! Yes, I completely agree. The beauty about TM for me has 
 always been its utter simplicity and versatility, and the complete 
 independence of the practice from any group, unless one so chooses. 
 Practice it anywhere- (except the US Congress, and while driving that 
 is).

But if you're a student who has accepted grant/scholarship money 
specifically to participate in a school where group meditation/sidhis 
practice is expected, what is the specific objection?

Perhaps these students all paid their own way, in which case perhaps 
they should issue specially colored badges to the scholarship students 
so they can be singled out for disciplinary action...

You take my point? People end up at MUM because they've elected to 
participate in the programs there, not just to take classes. If they're 
not willing to participate, then they should leave.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Ditto to the posts below -- MMY can do whatever he wants with his 
org.
  and I don't know anyone whining because they can't do other 
techniques
  in the dome, which is not what the banning is about anyway.  
 
 That's just the made-up excuse to justify it.

And you know this because?

 
  We're
  having a discussion to explain to ourselves why an org we've devoted
  so much of our lives to is tragically in decline.
 
 Exactly.

I forsee a revival of sorts, sorry to disappoint.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
  --- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   snip
If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a
   suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
   
   Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
   what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?
  
  Exactly. Ultimately, one is left to their own
  experiences and their own judgments and assessments as
  to whether something is effective or not. 
 
 With my own set of problems, the fact that I can feel even slightly
better after TM/TM-
 Sidhis practice, indicates a high level of effectiveness. Whether or
not TM  is worth doing 
 by OTHER people's standards, or whether or not MY criteria for
effectiveness is of value to 
 anyone else,  is left as an exercise for the reader.

That's the only criterion that counts. 
  
  The TM technique tends to be self-correcting. One person's
'effortlessness' is not the same as his/her efforlessness tomorrow.
It needs less protection than many think, but it does need to be
available and taught.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 It was common knowledge among students that manadatory attendance at 
the Dome 
 diminished enthusiasm for attendance.

When was attendance NOT mandatory?

 Your argument that a good kick in the backside 
 somehow will increase the positivity in students' attitudes towards 
group program no 
 doubt reflects the thinking of the administration as well. Is it any 
wonder the University is 
 having such a hard time attracting—and keeping—students?

Have you looked at the cost of education vs the standard of living in 
this country? The tuition fees at MUM are only reasonable if you 
believe that MUM has something unique to offer. I personally think that 
it does, but can certainly understand why parents wouldn't want their 
kids to go there --especially after the murder on campus.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers): PS

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   It was common knowledge among students that manadatory 
attendance 
 at the Dome 
   diminished enthusiasm for attendance. Your argument that a good 
 kick in the backside 
   somehow will increase the positivity in students' attitudes 
 towards group program no 
   doubt reflects the thinking of the administration as well. Is 
it 
 any wonder the University 
  is 
   having such a hard time attracting—and keeping—students?
   
   L B S
 
 My favorite quote for such thinking: The beatings will continue 
until 
 morale improves.

The mandatory meditation time will continue... is equivalent 
to the beatings will continue...?

Er, what's your take on religious traditions expecting 100% 
participation from the monks in the tradition? Yes, I know that TM 
isn't a religion, but the distinction isn't germane in this case.

 IMHO: you're [the student] attending a university where the ONLY 
important difference from a normal university is in the group 
practice of TM. If you wanted a reasonable education at another 
institution, you could obtain one for much less, although you 
wouldn't be able to take advantage of the grants given to MUM 
students SPECIFICALLY because they're supposed to be practicing TM 
and the TM-Sidhis while obtaining their education.

What's your [Jim Flannigan's] take for lying about accepting grant 
money in general, I wonder?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen 
[...]
 I always see the ultimate purity of the teaching as
 based in the enlivenment of pure consciousness in the
 followers. Look at the holy tradition. What links
 these guys is not specific practices, but the
 enlivenment of consciousness. Based on this criteria,
 the only successful graduate of the TM program is
 Sri Sri Ravi Shankar! 
 

How would you know? Do you think that SSRS is better off, enlightenment-
wise, than MMY? Do you think he's gone further than any other student 
of MMY's? How do you know?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified TM-
 Teachers, who is men,  can only teach men and recert. TM-Teachers 
 that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and week-end-
 courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do not 
 know if they can use same dining-hall.
 Ingegerd

Which is a problem ifthere is only one TM teacher in town. Hence they 
are encouraging husband and wife teams. Dennise Denniston-Gerace's 
husband will be joining her team soon, I understand...

BTW, while seperation of sexes for education sounds wierd to Westerners 
(at least in the 20th century), there's plenty of research showing that 
it can be beneficial, at least for women -at least in school. Perhaps 
there ARE female-only issues that are best dealt with by females, and 
likewise with males when it comes to teaching TM?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   
   --- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 If the pure technique you wish to protect were
 doing its job and offering its practitioners a
suitable
 pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
 even *interested* in seeing other teachers?

Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?
   
   Exactly. Ultimately, one is left to their own
   experiences and their own judgments and assessments as
   to whether something is effective or not. 
  
  With my own set of problems, the fact that I can feel even 
slightly
 better after TM/TM-
  Sidhis practice, indicates a high level of effectiveness. Whether 
or
 not TM  is worth doing 
  by OTHER people's standards, or whether or not MY criteria for
 effectiveness is of value to 
  anyone else,  is left as an exercise for the reader.
 
 That's the only criterion that counts. 
   
   The TM technique tends to be self-correcting. One person's
 'effortlessness' is not the same as his/her efforlessness tomorrow.
 It needs less protection than many think, but it does need to be
 available and taught.

Yep. I liken the effortlessness to the initial response to a question 
like remember that guy you met yesterday?

Whatever your initial response mentally, that's how effortless TM is 
(or can be, I guess).






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified TM-
  Teachers, who is men,  can only teach men and recert. TM-Teachers 
  that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and week-end-
  courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do 
not 
  know if they can use same dining-hall.
  Ingegerd
 
 Which is a problem ifthere is only one TM teacher in town. Hence 
they 
 are encouraging husband and wife teams. Dennise Denniston-Gerace's 
 husband will be joining her team soon, I understand...
 
 BTW, while seperation of sexes for education sounds wierd to 
Westerners 
 (at least in the 20th century), there's plenty of research showing 
that 
 it can be beneficial, at least for women -at least in school. 
Perhaps 
 there ARE female-only issues that are best dealt with by females, 
and 
 likewise with males when it comes to teaching TM?

This separation between teaching men and women has some funny side-
effects. People who has learned TM from recert. TM-Teachers turn to 
me ( an independent TM-Teacher) to get following-up, because they are 
not satisfied with the following-up in the TMO - and the recert. TM-
Teacher is very few and not available. In Norway it is one female 
recert. TM-Teacher.
Ingegerd




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
   If they only have one dining hall who gets to eat first?
  
  That's the question. 
  Ingegerd
 
 Put up a curtain?

Or - put on a burka.
Ingegerd
 
 
   
   
   The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified TM-
   Teachers, who is men,  can only teach men and recert. TM-
Teachers 
   that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and week-
end-
   courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do 
not 
   know if they can use same dining-hall.
   Ingegerd
   
  





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 off_world_beings wrote:
  
  anyone complaining that a few people can't 
  go to the dome is childish and laughable. ... 
  Maharishi doesn't want other pactices in the Dome  
  and that is his choice. People should get over it
 
 Oh, no question -- how Maharishi wants to run his 
 organization is his business. I'm not presuming to 
 tell him he should do this or that.
 
 My pursuit of this and other topics stems from a 
 life-long interest in what's healthy and appropriate 
 behavior. Many times I've felt some action of mine 
 was justified -- some anger or indignation -- only 
 to learn I was deceiving myself.
 
 Now, as you suggested I do, Off World, I'm examing 
 my belief that the purity of Maharishi's teaching 
 depends upon some behavior of mine. This discussion 
 is all about me. Maharishi has nothing to do with it.
 
 Thanks for your input.

In my case, since it's not likely I'll ever try to set foot
in a dome again in this incarnation, it's a matter of an
abiding interest in the ways that spiritual organizations
handle themselves, and what effects their different
behaviors seem to have on the progress of the members
of those organizations.  IMO, one of the least helpful and,
in fact, most detrimental, mindsets a spiritual organization
could possibly cultivate is elitism, a sense of self impor-
tance and exclusivity in its students.  Nothing seems to
stop spiritual progress in its tracks faster and more effec-
tively.  So I think it's kinda sad when I see it anywhere,
much less in an organization I still have some fond
memories of.  I guess that puts us on the same page,
with an interest in what's healthy and appropriate
behavior.

Unc





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread markmeredith2002
Ditto to the posts below -- MMY can do whatever he wants with his org.
and I don't know anyone whining because they can't do other techniques
in the dome, which is not what the banning is about anyway.  We're
having a discussion to explain to ourselves why an org we've devoted
so much of our lives to is tragically in decline.

Actually this was more of an issue for me in the past when not only
other saints were viewed with fear and alarm, but also psychiatrists,
marriage counselors, yoga teachers, non-ayurvedic MDs, and a whole
host of other healers all under the principle Maharishi has given us
all we need to reach enlightenment and You can't trust the effects
of practices not specifically approved by MMY.  Now it seems that
taking medications or seeing therapists or normal MDs to deal with
life's problems is not frowned upon as much as it used to be.  Campus
people still go to great lengths though to cover up their appts with
healers and others who offer services that could be viewed as in
competition with mmy ayurved or jyotish.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  off_world_beings wrote:
   
   anyone complaining that a few people can't 
   go to the dome is childish and laughable. ... 
   Maharishi doesn't want other pactices in the Dome  
   and that is his choice. People should get over it
  
  Oh, no question -- how Maharishi wants to run his 
  organization is his business. I'm not presuming to 
  tell him he should do this or that.
  
  My pursuit of this and other topics stems from a 
  life-long interest in what's healthy and appropriate 
  behavior. Many times I've felt some action of mine 
  was justified -- some anger or indignation -- only 
  to learn I was deceiving myself.
  
  Now, as you suggested I do, Off World, I'm examing 
  my belief that the purity of Maharishi's teaching 
  depends upon some behavior of mine. This discussion 
  is all about me. Maharishi has nothing to do with it.
  
  Thanks for your input.
 
 In my case, since it's not likely I'll ever try to set foot
 in a dome again in this incarnation, it's a matter of an
 abiding interest in the ways that spiritual organizations
 handle themselves, and what effects their different
 behaviors seem to have on the progress of the members
 of those organizations.  IMO, one of the least helpful and,
 in fact, most detrimental, mindsets a spiritual organization
 could possibly cultivate is elitism, a sense of self impor-
 tance and exclusivity in its students.  Nothing seems to
 stop spiritual progress in its tracks faster and more effec-
 tively.  So I think it's kinda sad when I see it anywhere,
 much less in an organization I still have some fond
 memories of.  I guess that puts us on the same page,
 with an interest in what's healthy and appropriate
 behavior.
 
 Unc




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ditto to the posts below -- MMY can do whatever he wants with his org.
 and I don't know anyone whining because they can't do other techniques
 in the dome, which is not what the banning is about anyway.  

That's just the made-up excuse to justify it.

 We're
 having a discussion to explain to ourselves why an org we've devoted
 so much of our lives to is tragically in decline.

Exactly.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Llundrub





When Charlie Lutes used to tour Iowa 
City it was always talked about with baited breath.


- Original Message - 
From: markmeredith2002 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 8:14 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest 
answers)
Ditto to the posts below -- MMY can do whatever he wants with 
his org.and I don't know anyone whining because they can't do other 
techniquesin the dome, which is not what the banning is about anyway. 
We'rehaving a discussion to explain to ourselves why an org we've 
devotedso much of our lives to is tragically in 
decline.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 off_world_beings wrote:
   
  I think you need to answer the question 
  I asked several posts back about keeping 
  the purity of the teaching.
 
 Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people 
 seem to have answered it in a number of ways:
 
 1. No one I know wants to fiddle with the basic 
 instructions for TM or the TM-Sidhis, so the whole 
 preservation of knowledge emphasis is irrelevant.
 
 2. The knowledge of TM is not so special as to 
 deserve special treatment. Making it out to be 
 special has more to do with cult indoctrination 
 than with keeping the barbarians from the gate.
 
 3. The purity will inevitably be lost; creating an 
 orthodoxy to preserve it fails in that mission but 
 succeeds in creating a culture of exclusion, fear 
 and faux superiority.
 
 4. We can maintain the purity of the teaching 
 without becoming Nazis about it.
 
 Perhaps others can contribute other answers. I 
 would hope we could hear your answer, Off World.
 

Seems to me that all of the above have some validity, which is why everyone 
disagrees.

Elephants in the living room, with a bunch of blind man watching TV?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 These paths don't fear comparison to others, because
 they know that they will fare well in that comparison.
 Why is it that TM fears the same comparison?


TM doesn't fear anything.

BTW, if a technique is as delicate as TM appears to be to me, then ANY addition 
to it might 
be counter-productive, though it might not be noticed.

In fact, since goals and signposts are easy to recognize in many other 
practices, and 
literally impossible to recognie in TM practice with complete reliability, ALL 
techniques, 
measured by their own standards, will seem better than TM.

TM has no real standards for practitioners to measure it by so in competition 
with other 
practices, using their standards, TM will always lose.

I've gotten used to losing the competition  over the past lifetime or fifty, 
so this doesn't 
bug me as much as it used to.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread L B Shriver
It was common knowledge among students that manadatory attendance at the Dome 
diminished enthusiasm for attendance. Your argument that a good kick in the 
backside 
somehow will increase the positivity in students' attitudes towards group 
program no 
doubt reflects the thinking of the administration as well. Is it any wonder the 
University is 
having such a hard time attracting—and keeping—students?

L B S

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On the face of it, LB's argument looks unanswerable. But  from what I 
 remember of students in the dome (not all of them) is that there was
 a lot of 
 sheer laziness and dopiness around. What some of them needed was a
 good 
 kick in the backside and a reminder to actually do the practice. In
 my 
 experience, if you do seize on the tiniest impulse to move around and
 to hop, 
 that actually does get the bliss moving around inside you, and this
 promotes 
 more of the stuff. It jump starts you, so to speak, so you're no
 longer just sitting 
 there like a big lump of inert matter. So while grading students on
 how much 
 they hop may seem senseless and a distortion of the teaching, it may
 in fact 
 wake people up and possibly do some good. 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Meanwhile, certain fundamentals of The Knowledge have actually been 
  compromised by the University. For example, the principle of
 innocence in 
 practice—
  absolutely foundational as far as I'm concerned—was completely
 trashed by 
 the practice of 
  grading students on their performance in the Domes, where they are 
 observed by faculty 
  and accorded a performance rating based on how much they hop. Does 
 anyone seriously 
  believe that a student who hasn't hopped until the last minute of
 the session 
 won't jump 
  up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 --- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  snip
   If the pure technique you wish to protect were
   doing its job and offering its practitioners a
  suitable
   pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
   even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
  
  Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
  what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?
 
 Exactly. Ultimately, one is left to their own
 experiences and their own judgments and assessments as
 to whether something is effective or not. 

With my own set of problems, the fact that I can feel even slightly better 
after TM/TM-
Sidhis practice, indicates a high level of effectiveness. Whether or not TM  is 
worth doing 
by OTHER people's standards, or whether or not MY criteria for effectiveness is 
of value to 
anyone else,  is left as an exercise for the reader.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers): PS

2005-07-22 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It was common knowledge among students that manadatory attendance at the Dome 
 diminished enthusiasm for attendance. Your argument that a good kick in the 
 backside 
 somehow will increase the positivity in students' attitudes towards group 
 program no 
 doubt reflects the thinking of the administration as well. Is it any wonder 
 the University 
is 
 having such a hard time attracting—and keeping—students?
 
 L B S

PS

MORE IMPORTANT

Diverting the attention from the sutra in any way interferes with the practice, 
as I have 
understood it. Does anyone seriously believe that there is something better 
than simple, 
natural, innocent in this regard?

L B S
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On the face of it, LB's argument looks unanswerable. But  from what I 
  remember of students in the dome (not all of them) is that there was
  a lot of 
  sheer laziness and dopiness around. What some of them needed was a
  good 
  kick in the backside and a reminder to actually do the practice. In
  my 
  experience, if you do seize on the tiniest impulse to move around and
  to hop, 
  that actually does get the bliss moving around inside you, and this
  promotes 
  more of the stuff. It jump starts you, so to speak, so you're no
  longer just sitting 
  there like a big lump of inert matter. So while grading students on
  how much 
  they hop may seem senseless and a distortion of the teaching, it may
  in fact 
  wake people up and possibly do some good. 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Meanwhile, certain fundamentals of The Knowledge have actually been 
   compromised by the University. For example, the principle of
  innocence in 
  practice—
   absolutely foundational as far as I'm concerned—was completely
  trashed by 
  the practice of 
   grading students on their performance in the Domes, where they are 
  observed by faculty 
   and accorded a performance rating based on how much they hop. Does 
  anyone seriously 
   believe that a student who hasn't hopped until the last minute of
  the session 
  won't jump 
   up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
[...]
 ---
 
 One response that I did not list in my earlier post might be this:
 
 5. I cannot say what is ultimate truth, nor will I take the word
 of others for what is truth. Hence I cannot say whether the 
 purity of TM is worth fighting for.
 

How about:

6. I don't know if the purity of teaching of TM is important or not, but on the 
outside 
chance that it is, I'm willing to tolerate a certain level of intolerance of 
out of the box 
thinking and behavior, and willing to try to work within the system to 
ameliorate that 
intolerance if I think that it has gotten out of hand.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 What exactly is purity of the teaching?  Go to see 5 different
 Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different readings using 5
 different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at maharishi jyotish
 courses and using his training faithfully decides to stop giving the
 right % of his revenues to the mov't, then he'll be called a threat to
 the purity of the teaching and have his badge revoked.  There are many
 similar cases in the tmo in which purity of teaching seems to just be
 an excuse to protect revenues.  MMY changed his method of teaching TM
 drastically when he came to west and initiators know that even the
 method of choosing mantras has been changed over time.  Instructions
 regarding program are constantly changing.  It seems to me that
 misusing the term purity of the teaching for purely economic reasons
 is itself the biggest threat to the purity of the teaching these days.

Since MMY created the teaching procedure himself (or so he says and I have no 
reason to 
doubt him) his decision to tweak the procedure is STILL maintaining the purity 
of the 
teaching. Its HIS teaching afterall...

Of course, this is so obvious that I'm left wondering if you're raising serious 
concerns or 
are merely complaining because you want to see your words in print.

(and people complain because *I* type too much on this forum).




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
  One response that I did not list in my earlier post might be this:
  
  5. I cannot say what is ultimate truth, nor will I take the word
  of others for what is truth. Hence I cannot say whether the 
  purity of TM is worth fighting for.
 
 That sentiment alone would make you a heretic in 
 some TM circles.  I once was the lone dissenting
 voice at a meeting of TM teachers in L.A. who turned
 a guy down for Teacher Training because he felt this
 way and was honest about it.

Well, that's understandable, isn't it? Since the purity of the teaching thing 
is the core 
rationale for the silliness of the TMO, to say that you can't say whether the 
purity is worth 
fighint for is invalidating the core rationale of the TMO.

Why would anyone agree to accept you into an organization if you publicly 
reject the core 
belief of the organiation?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers): PS

2005-07-22 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  It was common knowledge among students that manadatory attendance 
at the Dome 
  diminished enthusiasm for attendance. Your argument that a good 
kick in the backside 
  somehow will increase the positivity in students' attitudes 
towards group program no 
  doubt reflects the thinking of the administration as well. Is it 
any wonder the University 
 is 
  having such a hard time attracting—and keeping—students?
  
  L B S

My favorite quote for such thinking: The beatings will continue until 
morale improves.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 L B Shriver wrote:
 
  The Knowledge have actually been compromised 
  by the University. For example, the principle of 
  innocence in practice— absolutely foundational 
  as far as I'm concerned—was completely trashed 
  by the practice of grading students on their 
  performance in the Domes, where they are 
  observed by faculty and accorded a performance 
  rating based on how much they hop. Does anyone 
  seriously believe that a student who hasn't hopped 
  until the last minute of the session won't jump 
  up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?
 
 When I attended a reunion in 1999, I sat with the 
 5-minute flyers near the door. All those kids slept 
 through the entire program, with no pretense of 
 meditating or doing anything else. I wondered if 
 they were recruited in one of the programs to get 
 foreign students, for they were all non-Anglo and 
 obviously had no interest in meditation. I expect that
 program is no more. 
 

Perhaps the enlightenment report card based on the physiological measure of the 
students 
is meant to ensure that they really ARE meditating regularly?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Peter Sutphen


--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What exactly is purity of the teaching?  Go to see
 5 different
  Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different
 readings using 5
  different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at
 maharishi jyotish
  courses and using his training faithfully decides
 to stop giving the
  right % of his revenues to the mov't, then he'll
 be called a threat to
  the purity of the teaching and have his badge
 revoked.  There are many
  similar cases in the tmo in which purity of
 teaching seems to just be
  an excuse to protect revenues.  MMY changed his
 method of teaching TM
  drastically when he came to west and initiators
 know that even the
  method of choosing mantras has been changed over
 time.  Instructions
  regarding program are constantly changing.  It
 seems to me that
  misusing the term purity of the teaching for
 purely economic reasons
  is itself the biggest threat to the purity of the
 teaching these days.
 
 Since MMY created the teaching procedure himself (or
 so he says and I have no reason to 
 doubt him) his decision to tweak the procedure is
 STILL maintaining the purity of the 
 teaching. Its HIS teaching afterall...
 
 Of course, this is so obvious that I'm left
 wondering if you're raising serious concerns or 
 are merely complaining because you want to see your
 words in print.
 
 (and people complain because *I* type too much on
 this forum).

I always see the ultimate purity of the teaching as
based in the enlivenment of pure consciousness in the
followers. Look at the holy tradition. What links
these guys is not specific practices, but the
enlivenment of consciousness. Based on this criteria,
the only successful graduate of the TM program is
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar! 



 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 
 





Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Patrick Gillam 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:26 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)
 
 
 L B Shriver wrote:
 
  The Knowledge have actually been compromised 
  by the University. For example, the principle of 
  innocence in practice- absolutely foundational 
  as far as I'm concerned-was completely trashed 
  by the practice of grading students on their 
  performance in the Domes, where they are 
  observed by faculty and accorded a performance 
  rating based on how much they hop. Does anyone 
  seriously believe that a student who hasn't hopped 
  until the last minute of the session won't jump 
  up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?
 
 When I attended a reunion in 1999, I sat with the 
 5-minute flyers near the door. All those kids slept 
 through the entire program, with no pretense of 
 meditating or doing anything else. I wondered if 
 they were recruited in one of the programs to get 
 foreign students, for they were all non-Anglo and 
 obviously had no interest in meditation. I expect that
 program is no more. 
 
 - Patrick Gillam
 
 To join student purusha you had to be actively hopping. Of course you 
 also had to 
be actively hopping to move your 'flying time' up every six months. So I talked 
myself into 
flying. I had been one of the non flyers.  Then on student purusha you could 
automatically 
move up to the fifteen minute section and then advance your time five minutes 
every 
month so that after three months I was sitting with the 30 mintue flying guys.
 
 After I left MIU I decided there was no connection between hopping and 
 levitating so I 
never did it again.  How can bouncing help one stabilize in mid air?  I don't 
see the 
connection.


Well, you wouldn't (see the connection). I mean, seeing the connection is 
pretty advanced 
stuff --the equivalent of floating during Yogic Flying, I suspect.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Ingegerd
The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified TM-
Teachers, who is men,  can only teach men and recert. TM-Teachers 
that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and week-end-
courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do not 
know if they can use same dining-hall.
Ingegerd

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What exactly is purity of the teaching?  Go to see 5 different
  Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different readings using 5
  different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at maharishi 
jyotish
  courses and using his training faithfully decides to stop giving 
the
  right % of his revenues to the mov't, then he'll be called a 
threat to
  the purity of the teaching and have his badge revoked.  There are 
many
  similar cases in the tmo in which purity of teaching seems to 
just be
  an excuse to protect revenues.  MMY changed his method of 
teaching TM
  drastically when he came to west and initiators know that even the
  method of choosing mantras has been changed over time.  
Instructions
  regarding program are constantly changing.  It seems to me that
  misusing the term purity of the teaching for purely economic 
reasons
  is itself the biggest threat to the purity of the teaching these 
days.
 
 Since MMY created the teaching procedure himself (or so he says and 
I have no reason to 
 doubt him) his decision to tweak the procedure is STILL 
maintaining the purity of the 
 teaching. Its HIS teaching afterall...
 
 Of course, this is so obvious that I'm left wondering if you're 
raising serious concerns or 
 are merely complaining because you want to see your words in print.
 
 (and people complain because *I* type too much on this forum).




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Llundrub





If they only have one dining hall 
who gets to eat first?


- Original Message - 
From: Ingegerd 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:33 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest 
answers)
The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified 
TM-Teachers, who is men, can only teach men and recert. TM-Teachers 
that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and 
week-end-courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do not 
know if they can use same dining-hall.Ingegerd--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
"sparaig" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:  What exactly is purity of the teaching? Go to see 5 
different  Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different readings 
using 5  different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at 
maharishi jyotish  courses and using his training faithfully 
decides to stop giving the  right % of his revenues to the 
mov't, then he'll be called a threat to  the purity of the 
teaching and have his badge revoked. There are many  
similar cases in the tmo in which purity of teaching seems to just 
be  an excuse to protect revenues. MMY changed his method of 
teaching TM  drastically when he came to west and initiators 
know that even the  method of choosing mantras has been changed over 
time. Instructions  regarding program are constantly 
changing. It seems to me that  misusing the term "purity of 
the teaching" for purely economic reasons  is itself the biggest 
threat to the purity of the teaching these days.  Since MMY 
created the teaching procedure himself (or so he says and I have no reason 
to  doubt him) his decision to tweak the procedure is STILL 
maintaining "the purity of the  teaching." Its HIS "teaching" 
afterall...  Of course, this is so obvious that I'm left 
wondering if you're raising serious concerns or  are merely 
complaining because you want to see your words in print.  (and 
people complain because *I* type too much on this forum).





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If they only have one dining hall who gets to eat first?

That's the question. 
Ingegerd
 
 
 The teaching is becoming purer end purer. The recertified TM-
 Teachers, who is men,  can only teach men and recert. TM-Teachers 
 that are women can only teach women. In WPA-Courses and week-end-
 courses, during lecture-time - men and women is separeted. I do not 
 know if they can use same dining-hall.
 Ingegerd
 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread uns_tressor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The teaching is becoming purer end purer

...except for the Indies, of course. Hopefully they
will police themselves sensibly. Certainly in the UK
MMY has kicked the the door open. An own goal?
Uns.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread Peter Sutphen


--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Patrick Gillam 
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:26 PM
  Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the
 teaching (was Honest answers)
  
  
  L B Shriver wrote:
  
   The Knowledge have actually been compromised 
   by the University. For example, the principle of
 
   innocence in practice- absolutely foundational 
   as far as I'm concerned-was completely trashed 
   by the practice of grading students on their 
   performance in the Domes, where they are 
   observed by faculty and accorded a performance 
   rating based on how much they hop. Does anyone 
   seriously believe that a student who hasn't
 hopped 
   until the last minute of the session won't jump 
   up and down once or twice for the sake of the
 grade?
  
  When I attended a reunion in 1999, I sat with the 
  5-minute flyers near the door. All those kids
 slept 
  through the entire program, with no pretense of 
  meditating or doing anything else. I wondered if 
  they were recruited in one of the programs to get 
  foreign students, for they were all non-Anglo and 
  obviously had no interest in meditation. I expect
 that
  program is no more. 
  
  - Patrick Gillam
  
  To join student purusha you had to be actively
 hopping. Of course you also had to 
 be actively hopping to move your 'flying time' up
 every six months. So I talked myself into 
 flying. I had been one of the non flyers.  Then on
 student purusha you could automatically 
 move up to the fifteen minute section and then
 advance your time five minutes every 
 month so that after three months I was sitting with
 the 30 mintue flying guys.
  
  After I left MIU I decided there was no connection
 between hopping and levitating so I 
 never did it again.  How can bouncing help one
 stabilize in mid air?  I don't see the 
 connection.
 
 
 Well, you wouldn't (see the connection). I mean,
 seeing the connection is pretty advanced 
 stuff --the equivalent of floating during Yogic
 Flying, I suspect.
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 





__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If they only have one dining hall who gets to eat first?

And who gets to digest, as opposed to having one's intake
turn into icky shit?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  If they only have one dining hall who gets to eat first?
 
 And who gets to digest, as opposed to having one's intake
 turn into icky shit?

Eww, isn't that redundant?




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-22 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ditto to the posts below -- MMY can do whatever he wants with his 
org.
 and I don't know anyone whining because they can't do other 
techniques
 in the dome, 


But your ARE still whining about it. My God.

 
 Actually this was more of an issue for me in the past when not only
 other saints were viewed with fear and alarm, but also 
psychiatrists,
 marriage counselors, yoga teachers, non-ayurvedic MDs, and a whole
 host of other healers all under the principle Maharishi has given 
us
 all we need to reach enlightenment and You can't trust the 
effects
 of practices not specifically approved by MMY. 

Whining , Whining,  Whining.

 Now it seems that
 taking medications or seeing therapists or normal MDs to deal with
 life's problems is not frowned upon as much as it used to be.  
Campus
 people still go to great lengths though to cover up their appts 
with
 healers and others who offer services that could be viewed as in
 competition with mmy ayurved or jyotish.


Whining , Whining,  Whining.
Off World

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   off_world_beings wrote:

anyone complaining that a few people can't 
go to the dome is childish and laughable. ... 
Maharishi doesn't want other pactices in the Dome  
and that is his choice. People should get over it
   
   Oh, no question -- how Maharishi wants to run his 
   organization is his business. I'm not presuming to 
   tell him he should do this or that.
   
   My pursuit of this and other topics stems from a 
   life-long interest in what's healthy and appropriate 
   behavior. Many times I've felt some action of mine 
   was justified -- some anger or indignation -- only 
   to learn I was deceiving myself.
   
   Now, as you suggested I do, Off World, I'm examing 
   my belief that the purity of Maharishi's teaching 
   depends upon some behavior of mine. This discussion 
   is all about me. Maharishi has nothing to do with it.
   
   Thanks for your input.
  
  In my case, since it's not likely I'll ever try to set foot
  in a dome again in this incarnation, it's a matter of an
  abiding interest in the ways that spiritual organizations
  handle themselves, and what effects their different
  behaviors seem to have on the progress of the members
  of those organizations.  IMO, one of the least helpful and,
  in fact, most detrimental, mindsets a spiritual organization
  could possibly cultivate is elitism, a sense of self impor-
  tance and exclusivity in its students.  Nothing seems to
  stop spiritual progress in its tracks faster and more effec-
  tively.  So I think it's kinda sad when I see it anywhere,
  much less in an organization I still have some fond
  memories of.  I guess that puts us on the same page,
  with an interest in what's healthy and appropriate
  behavior.
  
  Unc





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 off_world_beings wrote:
   
  I think you need to answer the question 
  I asked several posts back about keeping 
  the purity of the teaching.
 
 Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people 
 seem to have answered it in a number of ways:
 
 1. No one I know wants to fiddle with the basic 
 instructions for TM or the TM-Sidhis, so the whole 
 preservation of knowledge emphasis is irrelevant.
 
 2. The knowledge of TM is not so special as to 
 deserve special treatment. Making it out to be 
 special has more to do with cult indoctrination 
 than with keeping the barbarians from the gate.
 
 3. The purity will inevitably be lost; creating an 
 orthodoxy to preserve it fails in that mission but 
 succeeds in creating a culture of exclusion, fear 
 and faux superiority.
 
 4. We can maintain the purity of the teaching 
 without becoming Nazis about it.
 
 Perhaps others can contribute other answers. I 
 would hope we could hear your answer, Off World.
 
  - Patrick Gillam

If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even *interested* in seeing other teachers?  I know
of quite a few organizations for which this is the case.
They never have to come up with rules about seeing
other teachers, because 1) the desire to do so rarely
comes up in their followers, and 2) even if it does, they
have no problem with the followers switching over to
the other teachers or following both paths. 

These paths don't fear comparison to others, because
they know that they will fare well in that comparison.
Why is it that TM fears the same comparison?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 off_world_beings wrote:
   
  I think you need to answer the question 
  I asked several posts back about keeping 
  the purity of the teaching.
 
 Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people 
 seem to have answered it in a number of ways:

(Not sure if these are your answers or just those
that you've seen elsewhere and are reproducing,
but I'm going to respond, if I may, as if they
were yours.)

 1. No one I know wants to fiddle with the basic 
 instructions for TM or the TM-Sidhis, so the whole 
 preservation of knowledge emphasis is irrelevant.

???  There are plenty of folks who want to fiddle,
and *have* fiddled, with the basic instructions.

 2. The knowledge of TM is not so special as to 
 deserve special treatment. Making it out to be 
 special has more to do with cult indoctrination 
 than with keeping the barbarians from the gate.

Sure about that?

 3. The purity will inevitably be lost; creating an 
 orthodoxy to preserve it fails in that mission but 
 succeeds in creating a culture of exclusion, fear 
 and faux superiority.

It doesn't fail to preserve it among the
orthodox.

 4. We can maintain the purity of the teaching 
 without becoming Nazis about it.

This I'd agree with, but different people may
draw different lines to distinguish who's a 
Nazi and who isn't.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 If the pure technique you wish to protect were
 doing its job and offering its practitioners a suitable
 pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
 even *interested* in seeing other teachers?

Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread Peter Sutphen


--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip
  If the pure technique you wish to protect were
  doing its job and offering its practitioners a
 suitable
  pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
  even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
 
 Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
 what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?

Exactly. Ultimately, one is left to their own
experiences and their own judgments and assessments as
to whether something is effective or not. 



 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 





Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread Patrick Gillam
  off_world_beings wrote:

   I think you need to answer the question 
   I asked several posts back about keeping 
   the purity of the teaching.
  
  Patrick Gillam wrote:
 
  Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people 
  seem to have answered it in a number of ways:
 
 Judy Stein wrote:

 (Not sure if these are your answers or just those
 that you've seen elsewhere and are reproducing,
 but I'm going to respond, if I may, as if they
 were yours.)

The options I wrote are my takes on what I've 
gleaned here. I'm not sure I'd fight for any one of 
them. One reason I pursued the subject is to find 
out what people think.

Because maintaining the purity of the teaching is 
the prime directive of TM teachers, I would think most 
would have to address the issue somehow, as Off World 
asks us to do.
  
  3. The purity will inevitably be lost; creating an 
  orthodoxy to preserve it fails in that mission but 
  succeeds in creating a culture of exclusion, fear 
  and faux superiority.
 
 It doesn't fail to preserve it among the
 orthodox.

I was baptized and confimed in the Lutheran Church-
Missouri Synod, a fundamentalist branch of Lutheranism. 
It's small, with maybe one million members in the United 
States. But that membership is adequate to sustain two 
seminaries and a lively sense of community. It's not losing 
members as so many mainstream denominations are. 

It takes care not to mingle with other churches who don't 
share its strict interpretation of scripture. For example, 
an LCMS pastor was reprimanded for participating in an 
ecumenical service shortly after September 11, 2001, 
where more liberal churches participated.

I think Maharishi is happy to be a school of knowledge 
in the LCMS mold -- not huge, but home to those who 
are honored to be custodians of truth in its purity.

---

One response that I did not list in my earlier post might be this:

5. I cannot say what is ultimate truth, nor will I take the word
of others for what is truth. Hence I cannot say whether the 
purity of TM is worth fighting for.

 - Patrick Gillam




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread markmeredith2002
What exactly is purity of the teaching?  Go to see 5 different
Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different readings using 5
different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at maharishi jyotish
courses and using his training faithfully decides to stop giving the
right % of his revenues to the mov't, then he'll be called a threat to
the purity of the teaching and have his badge revoked.  There are many
similar cases in the tmo in which purity of teaching seems to just be
an excuse to protect revenues.  MMY changed his method of teaching TM
drastically when he came to west and initiators know that even the
method of choosing mantras has been changed over time.  Instructions
regarding program are constantly changing.  It seems to me that
misusing the term purity of the teaching for purely economic reasons
is itself the biggest threat to the purity of the teaching these days.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
   off_world_beings wrote:
 
I think you need to answer the question 
I asked several posts back about keeping 
the purity of the teaching.
   
   Patrick Gillam wrote:
  
   Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people 
   seem to have answered it in a number of ways:
  
  Judy Stein wrote:
 
  (Not sure if these are your answers or just those
  that you've seen elsewhere and are reproducing,
  but I'm going to respond, if I may, as if they
  were yours.)
 
 The options I wrote are my takes on what I've 
 gleaned here. I'm not sure I'd fight for any one of 
 them. One reason I pursued the subject is to find 
 out what people think.
 
 Because maintaining the purity of the teaching is 
 the prime directive of TM teachers, I would think most 
 would have to address the issue somehow, as Off World 
 asks us to do.
   
   3. The purity will inevitably be lost; creating an 
   orthodoxy to preserve it fails in that mission but 
   succeeds in creating a culture of exclusion, fear 
   and faux superiority.
  
  It doesn't fail to preserve it among the
  orthodox.
 
 I was baptized and confimed in the Lutheran Church-
 Missouri Synod, a fundamentalist branch of Lutheranism. 
 It's small, with maybe one million members in the United 
 States. But that membership is adequate to sustain two 
 seminaries and a lively sense of community. It's not losing 
 members as so many mainstream denominations are. 
 
 It takes care not to mingle with other churches who don't 
 share its strict interpretation of scripture. For example, 
 an LCMS pastor was reprimanded for participating in an 
 ecumenical service shortly after September 11, 2001, 
 where more liberal churches participated.
 
 I think Maharishi is happy to be a school of knowledge 
 in the LCMS mold -- not huge, but home to those who 
 are honored to be custodians of truth in its purity.
 
 ---
 
 One response that I did not list in my earlier post might be this:
 
 5. I cannot say what is ultimate truth, nor will I take the word
 of others for what is truth. Hence I cannot say whether the 
 purity of TM is worth fighting for.
 
  - Patrick Gillam




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 One response that I did not list in my earlier post might be this:
 
 5. I cannot say what is ultimate truth, nor will I take the word
 of others for what is truth. Hence I cannot say whether the 
 purity of TM is worth fighting for.

That sentiment alone would make you a heretic in 
some TM circles.  I once was the lone dissenting
voice at a meeting of TM teachers in L.A. who turned
a guy down for Teacher Training because he felt this
way and was honest about it.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread TurquoiseB
   If the pure technique you wish to protect were
   doing its job and offering its practitioners a
   suitable
   pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
   even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
  
  Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
  what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?
 
 Exactly. Ultimately, one is left to their own
 experiences and their own judgments and assessments as
 to whether something is effective or not. 

While I agree, I think that this subjective perception can be,
and often is, colored by the spoken and unspoken dogma
that accompanies a tradition.  Take, for example, a tradition
such as the Dominican Order, in which mystical experiences
were not only uncommon, but suspect.  It would be very sur-
prising to find a Dominican monk who actually experienced
a mystical experience during his lifetime or, because of the
dogma, missed not having had one.

On the other hand, take traditions such as certain Tantric
sects or, closer to home, those who have worked with legi-
timate Yaqui shamans.  In those traditions, the general 
'tude is that if you haven't had a life-shattering, ephiphal
experience this week, you're probably slacking off.  :-)

Still, I hold to my original statement.  Whatever the dogma
of a spiritual tradition is, if large numbers of its followers 
are finding themselves interested in the teachings or tech-
niques of another tradition, I think it's safe to suggest that
something may be missing for them in their own.

In such slow traditions, it is *common* for a dogma to arise 
that portrays those who are not satisfied with their current
pace or progress as off the program or heretical or 
otherwise unsane.  The subtle pressure applied to those
who are not satisfied with a slow pace of self discovery
is along the lines of, There must be something wrong 
with them if they are not satisfied with what we *know* to
be the best.

Although this is completely understandable, I think it's
worth noticing that most of the humans whom history has
recorded as enlightened fall into the not satisfied group.
They were the rebels, the heretics, the Buddhas, the fol-
lowers of Crazy Wisdom, the ones who pushed the envel-
ope.  There may or may not be any connection between
their eventual enlightenment and what they pushed the
envelope *towards*, but I think that there is a connection
between the need to push the envelope and realization
of enlightenment.

At least that's my theory, for today, and I'm stickin' to it,
today.  Tomorrow I may have a completely different 
theory.  :-)

Unc






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 What exactly is purity of the teaching?  Go to see 5 different
 Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different readings using 5
 different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at maharishi jyotish
 courses and using his training faithfully decides to stop giving the
 right % of his revenues to the mov't, then he'll be called a threat to
 the purity of the teaching and have his badge revoked.  There are many
 similar cases in the tmo in which purity of teaching seems to just be
 an excuse to protect revenues.  MMY changed his method of teaching TM
 drastically when he came to west and initiators know that even the
 method of choosing mantras has been changed over time.  Instructions
 regarding program are constantly changing.  It seems to me that
 misusing the term purity of the teaching for purely economic reasons
 is itself the biggest threat to the purity of the teaching these days.

snip to end



Excellent question, cogent observations.

When I became an Initiator (Fiuggi '72) the purity of the teaching was about 
the content 
of The Knowledge and the method of its transmission.

In the 80s, someone in the power structure offered the opinion that MIU had 
been founded 
to preserve the purity of the teaching. This was not the case, actually. The 
means of 
preserving the content and method of transmission had already been established 
in the 
Teacher Training courses. Maharishi said that the rationale for MIU was that 
universities 
are understood and accepted by society as repositories and laboratories of 
useful 
knowledge (not a direct quote; minor extrapolation); the establishment of the 
university 
was to promote society's acceptance of The Knowledge. 

I think it's fair to say that the University's successes in society's eyes have 
been 
marginal. Meanwhile, certain fundamentals of The Knowledge have actually been 
compromised by the University. For example, the principle of innocence in 
practice—
absolutely foundational as far as I'm concerned—was completely trashed by the 
practice of 
grading students on their performance in the Domes, where they are observed by 
faculty 
and accorded a performance rating based on how much they hop. Does anyone 
seriously 
believe that a student who hasn't hopped until the last minute of the session 
won't jump 
up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?

When one drops the theoretical considerations and looks for an operational 
definition, the 
preponderance of evidence favors a financial basis to the Purity Of The 
Teaching. Anything 
that competes with the proprietary offering is considered Off The Program.

Simply put, The Purity Of The Teaching today seems to be mostly about the 
money. Which 
is why I place no faith in the organization to transmit anything of great 
spiritual value to 
the next generation.

L B S





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a
suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
   
   Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
   what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?
  
  Exactly. Ultimately, one is left to their own
  experiences and their own judgments and assessments as
  to whether something is effective or not. 
 
 While I agree, I think that this subjective perception can be,
 and often is, colored by the spoken and unspoken dogma
 that accompanies a tradition.

In either direction, of course.  And then
there's also the possibility that one's
subjective perception of the dogma can
color how one views one's own progress.

 Take, for example, a tradition
 such as the Dominican Order, in which mystical experiences
 were not only uncommon, but suspect.  It would be very sur-
 prising to find a Dominican monk who actually experienced
 a mystical experience during his lifetime or, because of the
 dogma, missed not having had one.
 
 On the other hand, take traditions such as certain Tantric
 sects or, closer to home, those who have worked with legi-
 timate Yaqui shamans.  In those traditions, the general 
 'tude is that if you haven't had a life-shattering, ephiphal
 experience this week, you're probably slacking off.  :-)

Or TM, which views experiences per se as
pretty much inconsequential, the important
thing being one's *experience* of everyday
life.

 Still, I hold to my original statement.  Whatever the dogma
 of a spiritual tradition is, if large numbers of its followers 
 are finding themselves interested in the teachings or tech-
 niques of another tradition, I think it's safe to suggest that
 something may be missing for them in their own.

Quite safe to suggest, actually.  But it
avoids the question of whether what they
think is missing is as significant as they
believe it to be.

 In such slow traditions, it is *common* for a dogma to arise 
 that portrays those who are not satisfied with their current
 pace or progress as off the program or heretical or 
 otherwise unsane.  The subtle pressure applied to those
 who are not satisfied with a slow pace of self discovery
 is along the lines of, There must be something wrong 
 with them if they are not satisfied with what we *know* to
 be the best.

Or they may just not be seeing the forest
for the trees.

snip
 At least that's my theory, for today, and I'm stickin' to it,
 day. Tomorrow I may have a completely different
 theory. :-)

Sounds to me like what you've been saying as long
as I can remember.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread Patrick Gillam
L B Shriver wrote:

 The Knowledge have actually been compromised 
 by the University. For example, the principle of 
 innocence in practice— absolutely foundational 
 as far as I'm concerned—was completely trashed 
 by the practice of grading students on their 
 performance in the Domes, where they are 
 observed by faculty and accorded a performance 
 rating based on how much they hop. Does anyone 
 seriously believe that a student who hasn't hopped 
 until the last minute of the session won't jump 
 up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?

When I attended a reunion in 1999, I sat with the 
5-minute flyers near the door. All those kids slept 
through the entire program, with no pretense of 
meditating or doing anything else. I wondered if 
they were recruited in one of the programs to get 
foreign students, for they were all non-Anglo and 
obviously had no interest in meditation. I expect that
program is no more. 

 - Patrick Gillam




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread Llundrub






- Original Message - 
From: Patrick Gillam 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest 
answers)

L B Shriver wrote: The Knowledge have actually been 
compromised  by the University. For example, the principle of  
innocence in practice— absolutely foundational  as far as I'm 
concerned—was completely trashed  by the practice of grading students on 
their  performance in the Domes, where they are  observed by 
faculty and accorded a performance  rating based on how much they hop. 
Does anyone  seriously believe that a student who hasn't hopped  
until the last minute of the session won't jump  up and down once or 
twice for the sake of the grade?When I attended a reunion in 1999, I sat 
with the 5-minute flyers near the door. All those kids slept through the 
entire program, with no pretense of meditating or doing anything else. I 
wondered if they were recruited in one of the programs to get foreign 
students, for they were all non-Anglo and obviously had no interest in 
meditation. I expect thatprogram is no more. - Patrick 
GillamTo join student purusha you had to be actively hopping. Of 
course you also had to be actively hopping to move your 'flying time' up every 
six months. So I talked myself into flying. I had been one of the non 
flyers. Then on student purusha you could automatically move up to the 
fifteen minute section and then advance your time five minutes every month so 
that after three months I was sitting with the 30 mintue flying guys.

After I left MIU I decided there was no connection between hopping and 
levitating so I never did it again. How can bouncing help one stabilize in 
mid air? I don't see the connection. 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread Robert Gimbel
---I agree with you: seems like you have to push the personal 
envelope, and get out of the ego to experience Unity...
Another way to think of it, is that we all have to find our 
own Christ Consciousness or Maharishi Consciousness or Buddah 
Consciousness and so on...in order to complete our dharma on earth, 
and that is to become Self-Realized;
There's just no pussy-footing around...when it comes to this...

 In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a
suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
   
   Suitable pace by whose standard?  Who decides
   what is and is not suitable, and on what basis?
  
  Exactly. Ultimately, one is left to their own
  experiences and their own judgments and assessments as
  to whether something is effective or not. 
 
 While I agree, I think that this subjective perception can be,
 and often is, colored by the spoken and unspoken dogma
 that accompanies a tradition.  Take, for example, a tradition
 such as the Dominican Order, in which mystical experiences
 were not only uncommon, but suspect.  It would be very sur-
 prising to find a Dominican monk who actually experienced
 a mystical experience during his lifetime or, because of the
 dogma, missed not having had one.
 
 On the other hand, take traditions such as certain Tantric
 sects or, closer to home, those who have worked with legi-
 timate Yaqui shamans.  In those traditions, the general 
 'tude is that if you haven't had a life-shattering, ephiphal
 experience this week, you're probably slacking off.  :-)
 
 Still, I hold to my original statement.  Whatever the dogma
 of a spiritual tradition is, if large numbers of its followers 
 are finding themselves interested in the teachings or tech-
 niques of another tradition, I think it's safe to suggest that
 something may be missing for them in their own.
 
 In such slow traditions, it is *common* for a dogma to arise 
 that portrays those who are not satisfied with their current
 pace or progress as off the program or heretical or 
 otherwise unsane.  The subtle pressure applied to those
 who are not satisfied with a slow pace of self discovery
 is along the lines of, There must be something wrong 
 with them if they are not satisfied with what we *know* to
 be the best.
 
 Although this is completely understandable, I think it's
 worth noticing that most of the humans whom history has
 recorded as enlightened fall into the not satisfied group.
 They were the rebels, the heretics, the Buddhas, the fol-
 lowers of Crazy Wisdom, the ones who pushed the envel-
 ope.  There may or may not be any connection between
 their eventual enlightenment and what they pushed the
 envelope *towards*, but I think that there is a connection
 between the need to push the envelope and realization
 of enlightenment.
 
 At least that's my theory, for today, and I'm stickin' to it,
 today.  Tomorrow I may have a completely different 
 theory.  :-)
 
 Unc





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread feste37
On the face of it, LB's argument looks unanswerable. But  from what I 
remember of students in the dome (not all of them) is that there was
a lot of 
sheer laziness and dopiness around. What some of them needed was a
good 
kick in the backside and a reminder to actually do the practice. In
my 
experience, if you do seize on the tiniest impulse to move around and
to hop, 
that actually does get the bliss moving around inside you, and this
promotes 
more of the stuff. It jump starts you, so to speak, so you're no
longer just sitting 
there like a big lump of inert matter. So while grading students on
how much 
they hop may seem senseless and a distortion of the teaching, it may
in fact 
wake people up and possibly do some good. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, L B Shriver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Meanwhile, certain fundamentals of The Knowledge have actually been 
 compromised by the University. For example, the principle of
innocence in 
practice—
 absolutely foundational as far as I'm concerned—was completely
trashed by 
the practice of 
 grading students on their performance in the Domes, where they are 
observed by faculty 
 and accorded a performance rating based on how much they hop. Does 
anyone seriously 
 believe that a student who hasn't hopped until the last minute of
the session 
won't jump 
 up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 off_world_beings wrote:
   
  I think you need to answer the question 
  I asked several posts back about keeping 
  the purity of the teaching.
 
 Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people 
 seem to have answered it in a number of ways:
 
 1. No one I know wants to fiddle with the basic 
 instructions for TM or the TM-Sidhis, so the whole 
 preservation of knowledge emphasis is irrelevant.
 
 2. The knowledge of TM is not so special as to 
 deserve special treatment. Making it out to be 
 special has more to do with cult indoctrination 
 than with keeping the barbarians from the gate.
 
 3. The purity will inevitably be lost; creating an 
 orthodoxy to preserve it fails in that mission but 
 succeeds in creating a culture of exclusion, fear 
 and faux superiority.
 
 4. We can maintain the purity of the teaching 
 without becoming Nazis about it.
 
 Perhaps others can contribute other answers. I 
 would hope we could hear your answer, Off World.
 
  - Patrick Gillam 

You made some good points and I appreciate them.

But people should complain about the violence being perpetrated by 
fundamentalists (christian and muslim etc), and stop complaining 
about non-violence being perpetrated by what they are calling 
fundamentalists. 

Its the violence or non-violence of a group that countsanyone 
complaining that a few people can't go to the dome is childish and 
laughable. If I want to smoke in a smoke free bar, I can't...thats 
life. If I want to swim nude in the public baths, I can't...thats 
life. Should I start waving my arms and shouting because my Pagan 
religion says I should be able to go nude anywhere I like to. No. 
Maharishi doesn't want other pactices in the Dome and that is his 
choice. People should get over it, otherwise I promise you, you will 
see me and my goat naked in the public pools soon !
OffWorld






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread Jason Spock






--OriginalMessage-
From: "Llundrub" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:07:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers) 

L B Shriver wrote:
 The Knowledge have actually been compromised by the University. For example, the principle of innocence in practice— absolutely foundational as far as I'm concerned—was completely trashed by the practice of grading students on their performance in the Domes, where they are observed by faculty and accorded a performance rating based on how much they hop. Does anyone seriously believe that a student who hasn't hopped until the last minute of the session won't jump up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?
 *
 To join student purusha you had to be actively hopping. Of course you also had to be actively hopping to move your 'flying time' up every six months. So I talked myself into flying. I had been one of the non flyers. Then on student purusha you could automatically move up to the fifteen minute section and then advance your time five minutes every month so that after three months I was sitting with the 30 mintue flying guys. After I left MIU I decided there was no connection between hopping and levitating so I never did it again. How can bouncing help one stabilize in mid air? I don't see the connection.  by Llundrub

 Hari Om, The Only solution is to increase the coherence of the field effect around the Yogic flying centres. This will result in the ability to float in the air. Yogic-Floating. then NoBody would be able to fake bounce.

 In Yogic-Floating theMaharishi-effect will be much greater. World peace can be achieved with Cube root of the world population.

 Jason
--
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Patrick Gillam 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:26 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest 
answers)
 
 
 L B Shriver wrote:
 
  The Knowledge have actually been compromised 
  by the University. For example, the principle of 
  innocence in practice- absolutely foundational 
  as far as I'm concerned-was completely trashed 
  by the practice of grading students on their 
  performance in the Domes, where they are 
  observed by faculty and accorded a performance 
  rating based on how much they hop. Does anyone 
  seriously believe that a student who hasn't hopped 
  until the last minute of the session won't jump 
  up and down once or twice for the sake of the grade?
 
 When I attended a reunion in 1999, I sat with the 
 5-minute flyers near the door. All those kids slept 
 through the entire program, with no pretense of 
 meditating or doing anything else. I wondered if 
 they were recruited in one of the programs to get 
 foreign students, for they were all non-Anglo and 
 obviously had no interest in meditation. I expect that
 program is no more. 
 
 - Patrick Gillam
 
 To join student purusha you had to be actively hopping. Of 
course you also had to be actively hopping to move your 'flying 
time' up every six months. So I talked myself into flying. 

So now I understand a lot. It must be frustrating to never have 
hopped spontaneuosly. I am sorry , but it will happen eventually. 
And having to introduce strain into it must have screwed up your 
experiences. It is very bad for the experience to introduce strain. 
You need to think more about how there are many lifetimes , not just 
one. You will fly through an non-effort appraoch to the technique. 
Keep on keeping on, and don't get distracted.
OffWorld




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest answers)

2005-07-21 Thread Patrick Gillam
off_world_beings wrote:
 
 anyone complaining that a few people can't 
 go to the dome is childish and laughable. ... 
 Maharishi doesn't want other pactices in the Dome  
 and that is his choice. People should get over it

Oh, no question -- how Maharishi wants to run his 
organization is his business. I'm not presuming to 
tell him he should do this or that.

My pursuit of this and other topics stems from a 
life-long interest in what's healthy and appropriate 
behavior. Many times I've felt some action of mine 
was justified -- some anger or indignation -- only 
to learn I was deceiving myself.

Now, as you suggested I do, Off World, I'm examing 
my belief that the purity of Maharishi's teaching 
depends upon some behavior of mine. This discussion 
is all about me. Maharishi has nothing to do with it.

Thanks for your input.

 - Patrick Gillam





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/