RBtools - errors with Python 3.4
FYI: Getting errors with python 3.4 (64 bit). Dumping here. Switching back to 2.7.7 removes all them. easy_install RBTools Searching for RBTools Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/RBTools/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/RBTools/0.2/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.2/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.3/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.4/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.5/ Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.6/ Reading http://www.review-board.org/ Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/ Best match: RBTools 0.6.2 Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.6/RBTools-0.6.2. tar.gz#md5=fbeae5f029d2ccd6db1c92dff9814900 Processing RBTools-0.6.2.tar.gz Writing C:\Users\VMU~1.CAS\AppData\Local\Temp\easy_install-j3fourka\RBTools-0.6. 2\setup.cfg Running RBTools-0.6.2\setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir C:\Users\VMU~1.CAS\AppDat a\Local\Temp\easy_install-j3fourka\RBTools-0.6.2\egg-dist-tmp-irl3eyxb File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\api\request.py, line 245 except urllib2.HTTPError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\clients\clearcase.py, line 561 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\clients\cvs.py, line 49 except socket.error, msg: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\clients\perforce.py, line 135 print record['data'] ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\clients\svn.py, line 687 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\clients\tests.py, line 865 raise SkipTest(msg), None, sys.exc_info()[2] ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\clients\__init__.py, line 200 except IOError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\api_get.py, line 58 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\attach.py, line 29 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\close.py, line 35 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\diff.py, line 61 print diff ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\main.py, line 49 print help_text ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\patch.py, line 57 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\post.py, line 409 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\publish.py, line 19 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\setup_repo.py, line 93 except IOError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\status.py, line 27 printr/%s - %s % (request.id, request.summary) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\commands\__init__.py, line 417 except CommandError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\hooks\common.py, line 26 except ServerInterfaceError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\utils\console.py, line 20 print '%s is not a valid answer.' % answer ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\utils\filesystem.py, line 49 except SyntaxError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\rbtools\utils\process.py, line 17 print msg ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents... rbtools.clients.__pycache__.mercurial.cpython-34: module references __file__ File c:\python34\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.6.2-py3.4.egg\rbtools\api\reques t.py, line 245 except urllib2.HTTPError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File c:\python34\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.6.2-py3.4.egg\rbtools\clients\cl earcase.py, line 561 except APIError, e: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax File c:\python34\lib\site-packages\rbtools-0.6.2-py3.4.egg\rbtools\clients\cv s.py, line 49 except
Re: stuck in last step - configuring email
PFA patch. generated by git --diff command. Le me know if you need me to make any changes. On Friday, October 10, 2014 4:05:34 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: K, will work on patch - will give UI option. give me couple of days though. On Friday, October 10, 2014 12:12:12 PM UTC+5:30, chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hi Neel, I'd accept a patch that adds a toggle for this, defaulting to being on in order to prevent breaking current behavior. Let me know if you have any questions about it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: neel roy neel...@rediffmail.com Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com revie...@googlegroups.com Date: October 9, 2014 at 11:38:24 PM To: revie...@googlegroups.com revie...@googlegroups.com Cc: neel...@rediffmail.com neel...@rediffmail.com, chri...@beanbaginc.com chri...@beanbaginc.com Subject: Re: stuck in last step - configuring email Christian, I will try to get the information of setup from IT but in parallel, is it possible that it will always be the email account given will send the mail instead of sending on behalf of users? If it's not possible right now, would you be willing to accept the patch if I manage to work on it? -Neel. On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:19:57 AM UTC+5:30, chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hi Neel, Without knowing more about your setup, I can't say for sure. Out of the box, we support plain text authentication and using TLS. I'd need to know more details on your authentication setup for your mail server to be able to give you a more informed answer. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: neel roy Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com Date: October 7, 2014 at 3:26:25 PM To: revie...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: stuck in last step - configuring email anyone? On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:00:01 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi, Probably last step but I am stuck there anyway :) So, I configured the email and found that account I am using does not have privilege of sending mails on behalf of other users. Asked IT guys to fix it. They have but now I have problem with plain authentication method. The diagnosis is based on following log from reviewboard: - Error sending e-mail notification with subject '' on behalf of '' to ',,': *No suitable authentication method found.* Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.8-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/notifications/email.py, line 279, in send_review_mail message.send() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 276, in send return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 87, in send_messages new_conn_created = self.open() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 54, in open self.connection.login(self.username, self.password) File /usr/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 611, in login raise SMTPException(No suitable authentication method found.)*SMTPException: No suitable authentication method found.* *As per question ** http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1684534/python-and-sll-exchange-2007-no-suitable-authentication-method-found I think we require Plain Text Authentication method enabled on exchange server, which might be a no-no (don't know; haven't asked those IT guys yet). But before I ask them I wanted to know whether there is any other workaround?* *Is there a way I can use non-plain text authentication method?* *Appreciate any help,* *-Neel.* -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
Re: stuck in last step - configuring email
Christian, I will try to get the information of setup from IT but in parallel, is it possible that it will always be the email account given will send the mail instead of sending on behalf of users? If it's not possible right now, would you be willing to accept the patch if I manage to work on it? -Neel. On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:19:57 AM UTC+5:30, chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hi Neel, Without knowing more about your setup, I can't say for sure. Out of the box, we support plain text authentication and using TLS. I'd need to know more details on your authentication setup for your mail server to be able to give you a more informed answer. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: neel roy neel...@rediffmail.com javascript: Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: Date: October 7, 2014 at 3:26:25 PM To: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: Subject: Re: stuck in last step - configuring email anyone? On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:00:01 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi, Probably last step but I am stuck there anyway :) So, I configured the email and found that account I am using does not have privilege of sending mails on behalf of other users. Asked IT guys to fix it. They have but now I have problem with plain authentication method. The diagnosis is based on following log from reviewboard: - Error sending e-mail notification with subject '' on behalf of '' to ',,': *No suitable authentication method found.* Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.8-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/notifications/email.py, line 279, in send_review_mail message.send() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 276, in send return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 87, in send_messages new_conn_created = self.open() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 54, in open self.connection.login(self.username, self.password) File /usr/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 611, in login raise SMTPException(No suitable authentication method found.)*SMTPException: No suitable authentication method found.* *As per question ** http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1684534/python-and-sll-exchange-2007-no-suitable-authentication-method-found I think we require Plain Text Authentication method enabled on exchange server, which might be a no-no (don't know; haven't asked those IT guys yet). But before I ask them I wanted to know whether there is any other workaround?* *Is there a way I can use non-plain text authentication method?* *Appreciate any help,* *-Neel.* -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: stuck in last step - configuring email
K, will work on patch - will give UI option. give me couple of days though. On Friday, October 10, 2014 12:12:12 PM UTC+5:30, chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hi Neel, I'd accept a patch that adds a toggle for this, defaulting to being on in order to prevent breaking current behavior. Let me know if you have any questions about it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: neel roy neel...@rediffmail.com javascript: Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: Date: October 9, 2014 at 11:38:24 PM To: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: Cc: neel...@rediffmail.com javascript: neel...@rediffmail.com javascript:, chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: chri...@beanbaginc.com javascript: Subject: Re: stuck in last step - configuring email Christian, I will try to get the information of setup from IT but in parallel, is it possible that it will always be the email account given will send the mail instead of sending on behalf of users? If it's not possible right now, would you be willing to accept the patch if I manage to work on it? -Neel. On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:19:57 AM UTC+5:30, chri...@beanbaginc.com wrote: Hi Neel, Without knowing more about your setup, I can't say for sure. Out of the box, we support plain text authentication and using TLS. I'd need to know more details on your authentication setup for your mail server to be able to give you a more informed answer. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com -Original Message- From: neel roy Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com Date: October 7, 2014 at 3:26:25 PM To: revie...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: stuck in last step - configuring email anyone? On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:00:01 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi, Probably last step but I am stuck there anyway :) So, I configured the email and found that account I am using does not have privilege of sending mails on behalf of other users. Asked IT guys to fix it. They have but now I have problem with plain authentication method. The diagnosis is based on following log from reviewboard: - Error sending e-mail notification with subject '' on behalf of '' to ',,': *No suitable authentication method found.* Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.8-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/notifications/email.py, line 279, in send_review_mail message.send() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 276, in send return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 87, in send_messages new_conn_created = self.open() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 54, in open self.connection.login(self.username, self.password) File /usr/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 611, in login raise SMTPException(No suitable authentication method found.)*SMTPException: No suitable authentication method found.* *As per question ** http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1684534/python-and-sll-exchange-2007-no-suitable-authentication-method-found I think we require Plain Text Authentication method enabled on exchange server, which might be a no-no (don't know; haven't asked those IT guys yet). But before I ask them I wanted to know whether there is any other workaround?* *Is there a way I can use non-plain text authentication method?* *Appreciate any help,* *-Neel.* -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review
Re: stuck in last step - configuring email
anyone? On Monday, October 6, 2014 10:00:01 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi, Probably last step but I am stuck there anyway :) So, I configured the email and found that account I am using does not have privilege of sending mails on behalf of other users. Asked IT guys to fix it. They have but now I have problem with plain authentication method. The diagnosis is based on following log from reviewboard: - Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review request description' on behalf of 'user1' to 'user1,user2,user3': *No suitable authentication method found.* Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.8-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/notifications/email.py, line 279, in send_review_mail message.send() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 276, in send return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 87, in send_messages new_conn_created = self.open() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 54, in open self.connection.login(self.username, self.password) File /usr/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 611, in login raise SMTPException(No suitable authentication method found.)*SMTPException: No suitable authentication method found.* *As per question **http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1684534/python-and-sll-exchange-2007-no-suitable-authentication-method-found http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1684534/python-and-sll-exchange-2007-no-suitable-authentication-method-found I think we require Plain Text Authentication method enabled on exchange server, which might be a no-no (don't know; haven't asked those IT guys yet). But before I ask them I wanted to know whether there is any other workaround?* *Is there a way I can use non-plain text authentication method?* *Appreciate any help,* *-Neel.* -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
stuck in last step - configuring email
Hi, Probably last step but I am stuck there anyway :) So, I configured the email and found that account I am using does not have privilege of sending mails on behalf of other users. Asked IT guys to fix it. They have but now I have problem with plain authentication method. The diagnosis is based on following log from reviewboard: - Error sending e-mail notification with subject 'Review request description' on behalf of 'user1' to 'user1,user2,user3': *No suitable authentication method found.* Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0.8-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/notifications/email.py, line 279, in send_review_mail message.send() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/message.py, line 276, in send return self.get_connection(fail_silently).send_messages([self]) File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 87, in send_messages new_conn_created = self.open() File /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/core/mail/backends/smtp.py, line 54, in open self.connection.login(self.username, self.password) File /usr/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 611, in login raise SMTPException(No suitable authentication method found.)*SMTPException: No suitable authentication method found.* *As per question **http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1684534/python-and-sll-exchange-2007-no-suitable-authentication-method-found I think we require Plain Text Authentication method enabled on exchange server, which might be a no-no (don't know; haven't asked those IT guys yet). But before I ask them I wanted to know whether there is any other workaround?* *Is there a way I can use non-plain text authentication method?* *Appreciate any help,* *-Neel.* -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Setting up subversion repository
any update on this? On Saturday, September 27, 2014 4:23:29 AM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Thanks for the answer. Few points: - I used the same creds when checking out with plain svn command line tool and it worked perfectly fine. Why should reviewboard fail with it? - I don't see any log about what command is being launched and from where from within the code. Is there a way to get that? - where does reviewboard stores these details about creds and repository so that I can see what is being stored? -Neel. On Saturday, September 27, 2014 3:34:52 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: In general, we've found pysvn to be somewhat more reliable than subvertpy, so I'd suggest switching back. That error suggests to me that the credentials listed in the repository admin were incorrect. -David On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:41 AM, neel roy neel...@rediffmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having problems with setting up with subversion repository. Reviewboard version: 2.0.8 When I click on New Review Request, I get Authentication failed when talking to the Subversion repository at the bottom of page. So as per suggestion in https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.2/, I changed from pysvn to subvertpy and I get different error: (Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://repository', 170001) We do require username so I tried to use plain svn from command line: svn co --username=my username svn://path-to-checkout-path and it worked without a problem. Do I need to do something else? The only thing I see in server log is: 12:39:39WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:848: RuntimeWarning: DateTimeField ReviewRequest.time_added received a naive datetime (2014-09-27 00:00:00) while time zone support is active. RuntimeWarning) Any idea what do I need to do? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Setting up subversion repository
okay, figured it out. Even though svn repository does not require password, it needs to store no password condition in some file under .subversion/auth/svn.simple it seems. If you are doing this from command line, it will ask whether you want to store password in unencrypted format. If you say yes, it will store the file under svn.simple directory. I copied the file to svn.simple directory under /data/.subversion/auth/svn.simple/ from my login and it worked. But I am thinking this must be normal condition and reviewboard should be able to handle it.. right? -Neel. On Monday, September 29, 2014 5:21:38 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: any update on this? On Saturday, September 27, 2014 4:23:29 AM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Thanks for the answer. Few points: - I used the same creds when checking out with plain svn command line tool and it worked perfectly fine. Why should reviewboard fail with it? - I don't see any log about what command is being launched and from where from within the code. Is there a way to get that? - where does reviewboard stores these details about creds and repository so that I can see what is being stored? -Neel. On Saturday, September 27, 2014 3:34:52 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: In general, we've found pysvn to be somewhat more reliable than subvertpy, so I'd suggest switching back. That error suggests to me that the credentials listed in the repository admin were incorrect. -David On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:41 AM, neel roy neel...@rediffmail.com wrote: Hi, I am having problems with setting up with subversion repository. Reviewboard version: 2.0.8 When I click on New Review Request, I get Authentication failed when talking to the Subversion repository at the bottom of page. So as per suggestion in https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.2/, I changed from pysvn to subvertpy and I get different error: (Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://repository', 170001) We do require username so I tried to use plain svn from command line: svn co --username=my username svn://path-to-checkout-path and it worked without a problem. Do I need to do something else? The only thing I see in server log is: 12:39:39WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:848: RuntimeWarning: DateTimeField ReviewRequest.time_added received a naive datetime (2014-09-27 00:00:00) while time zone support is active. RuntimeWarning) Any idea what do I need to do? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Setting up subversion repository
Thanks for the answer. Few points: - I used the same creds when checking out with plain svn command line tool and it worked perfectly fine. Why should reviewboard fail with it? - I don't see any log about what command is being launched and from where from within the code. Is there a way to get that? - where does reviewboard stores these details about creds and repository so that I can see what is being stored? -Neel. On Saturday, September 27, 2014 3:34:52 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: In general, we've found pysvn to be somewhat more reliable than subvertpy, so I'd suggest switching back. That error suggests to me that the credentials listed in the repository admin were incorrect. -David On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:41 AM, neel roy neel...@rediffmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi, I am having problems with setting up with subversion repository. Reviewboard version: 2.0.8 When I click on New Review Request, I get Authentication failed when talking to the Subversion repository at the bottom of page. So as per suggestion in https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.2/, I changed from pysvn to subvertpy and I get different error: (Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://repository', 170001) We do require username so I tried to use plain svn from command line: svn co --username=my username svn://path-to-checkout-path and it worked without a problem. Do I need to do something else? The only thing I see in server log is: 12:39:39WARNING - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.7-py2.7.egg/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py:848: RuntimeWarning: DateTimeField ReviewRequest.time_added received a naive datetime (2014-09-27 00:00:00) while time zone support is active. RuntimeWarning) Any idea what do I need to do? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
please, please, please, please help me with installation
It's 8:10 pm and I have been fighting with reviewboard installation for last SIX hours. I tried with apache2 and I ran into 000-default site problem.. from https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/creating-sites/#creating-sites: Some Apache installations (such as the default installs on Debian and Ubuntu) by default define a global virtual host that shares /var/www as the document root. This may lead to problems with your install. If you access your site and see nothing but a directory listing, then you’re affected by this problem. The solution is to remove the “default” site from your /etc/apache2/sites-enabled directory. This may be called something like default or 000-default. Then I had to figure out after an hour that I had to specify --web-server if I want to use lighttpd. After that there were some few more errors (I can go into details but I don't think that's going to help my cause). So here is process I have followed: http://alephnullplex.appspot.com/blog/view/2009/07/09/tutorial-installing-review-board-on-ubuntu Replace installation of apache2 with lighttpd and mod-python with fastcgi. Nothing works. Right now I am here: *rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard runfcgi method=threaded* WSGIServer: missing FastCGI param REQUEST_METHOD required by WSGI! WSGIServer: missing FastCGI param SERVER_NAME required by WSGI! WSGIServer: missing FastCGI param SERVER_PORT required by WSGI! WSGIServer: missing FastCGI param SERVER_PROTOCOL required by WSGI! Status: 302 FOUND Content-Length: 0 Content-Language: en Vary: Cookie, Accept-Language Location: http://localhost/r/ Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:34:37 GMT X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 I don't know what I have done which is causing this. file reviewboard.settings is missing; don't know why. Could someone give me steps to install reviewboard on ubuntu (14.04) with lighttpd? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: please, please, please, please help me with installation
Okay, I fixed the problem. here are the couple of changes I did: sudo apt-get install apache2 sudo apt-get install libapache2-mod-wsgi sudo a2enmod *wsgi* sudo apt-get install mysql-server sudo apt-get install python-mysqldb sudo apt-get install memcached sudo apt-get install memcached-dev sudo apt-get install python-memcache mysql -uroot -p mysql create database reviewboard; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql create user 'rb'@'localhost' identified by 'rb_password'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql grant all on reviewboard.* to 'rb'@'localhost'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql exit Bye sudo apt-get install patch sudo apt-get install subversion sudo apt-get install python-svn sudo apt-get install python-setuptools sudo easy_install reviewboard sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/uploaded sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/data *sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext* sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static/ext cd /etc/apache2/sites-available cp /var/www/reviewboard/conf/apache-wsgi.conf reviewboard.conf cd ../sites-enabled ln -s ../sites-available/reviewboard.conf . *If I remove 000-default folder\file, I get this webpage not available error..* optional steps (Because default site is still enabled) === *These do NOT seem to be optional steps anymore* sudo a2dissite 000-default sudo a2ensite reviewboard sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart *This is a very important step; got it from https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/_D12QMhA8OY* *change the /var/www/reviews/conf/settings_local.py ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['localhost'] to ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['*'].* *May be we can put this in the installation instructions page as concrete steps instead of general directions?* Now to the next steps.. playing with rb-tools. I will post problems if any.. -Neel. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:05:16 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the reply. The problem with Apache was that even if I removed 000-default folder or disabled it, I still could not get apache2 to display reviewboard site. here are the complete steps I did; these are basically the same steps mentioned in the tutorial site I mentioned above but little bit of changes which I have made bold in listing below. Do you think I need to change something: sudo apt-get install apache2 *sudo apt-get install libapache2-mod-wsgi* sudo a2enmod python sudo apt-get install mysql-server sudo apt-get install python-mysqldb sudo apt-get install memcached sudo apt-get install memcached-dev sudo apt-get install python-memcache mysql -uroot -p mysql create database reviewboard; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec) mysql create user 'rb'@'localhost' identified by 'rb_password'; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql grant all on reviewboard.* to 'rb'@'localhost' Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql exit Bye sudo apt-get install patch sudo apt-get install subversion sudo apt-get install python-svn sudo apt-get install python-setuptools sudo easy_install reviewboard sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard *sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/uploaded* *sudo chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/data* *cd /etc/apache2/sites-available* *cp /var/www/reviewboard/conf/apache-wsgi.conf reviewboard.conf* *cd ../sites-enabled* *ln -s ../sites-available/reviewboard.conf .* *If I remove 000-default folder\file, I get this webpage not available error..* optional steps (Because default site is still enabled) sudo a2dissite 000-default sudo a2ensite reviewboard sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart -Neel. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:43:18 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Neel, lighttpd is not well-supported, which is why it's considered an advanced option. Very few people seem to use it. I'd *strongly* suggest using Apache + mod_wsgi (daemon mode works well these days), if at all possible. You'll have the best support that way. FastCGI is a bad option. We've seen people hit all sorts of issues with it. The Python community has rallied around mod_wsgi and similar solutions instead. I think you'll find that if you use the standard recommended options from rb-site, you'll have a much easier time getting going. As for the 000-default file, I'm sorry it cost you an hour of time. It is annoying that Apache ships that.. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com On September 24, 2014 at 7:47:23 AM, neel roy (neel...@rediffmail.com) wrote: It's 8:10 pm and I have been fighting with reviewboard installation for last SIX hours. I tried with apache2 and I ran into 000-default site problem.. from https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin
Re: pre-commit review request with svn integration
the first one - I want reviewboard to commit the code.. On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 10:55:56 PM UTC+2, David Trowbridge wrote: Are you wanting it so that Review Board commits the code, or do you want it so that `svn commit` will only succeed if the code has been reviewed? -David On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:36 AM, neel roy neel...@rediffmail.com javascript: wrote: anyone? specially about #4? On Friday, July 4, 2014 7:37:02 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi, This is what I want to do. I am sure it's not possible today but can I know a) whether you find it useful enough to put in the next release or b) is there a way for me to write an extension that will do this without me having to create a private build of reviewboard everytime I update the review board? !. I have SVN repository 2. When I click on SVN commit or use command line to commit a change, internally a review request should be created which will use preset user preferences based on branch and username 3. post it to reviewboard 4. once it gets a ship it! and user clicks submit, it should actually go in repository I know that I can write a wrapper over svn command line utility and do the stuff that I need to do in #2. But I wanted to know if there is better way. For #4, I wanted to know whether it is possible currently in reviewboard and\or I can write an extension which will do it without having to make a private build every time. Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: pre-commit review request with svn integration
anyone? specially about #4? On Friday, July 4, 2014 7:37:02 PM UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi, This is what I want to do. I am sure it's not possible today but can I know a) whether you find it useful enough to put in the next release or b) is there a way for me to write an extension that will do this without me having to create a private build of reviewboard everytime I update the review board? !. I have SVN repository 2. When I click on SVN commit or use command line to commit a change, internally a review request should be created which will use preset user preferences based on branch and username 3. post it to reviewboard 4. once it gets a ship it! and user clicks submit, it should actually go in repository I know that I can write a wrapper over svn command line utility and do the stuff that I need to do in #2. But I wanted to know if there is better way. For #4, I wanted to know whether it is possible currently in reviewboard and\or I can write an extension which will do it without having to make a private build every time. Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
pre-commit review request with svn integration
Hi, This is what I want to do. I am sure it's not possible today but can I know a) whether you find it useful enough to put in the next release or b) is there a way for me to write an extension that will do this without me having to create a private build of reviewboard everytime I update the review board? !. I have SVN repository 2. When I click on SVN commit or use command line to commit a change, internally a review request should be created which will use preset user preferences based on branch and username 3. post it to reviewboard 4. once it gets a ship it! and user clicks submit, it should actually go in repository I know that I can write a wrapper over svn command line utility and do the stuff that I need to do in #2. But I wanted to know if there is better way. For #4, I wanted to know whether it is possible currently in reviewboard and\or I can write an extension which will do it without having to make a private build every time. Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Malformed Diff
Does anyone has any clue about why this is happening? On Thursday, 10 April 2014 17:11:51 UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: Hi, I am using revieweboard and when I create diff using either post-review or rbt, and upload that diff in reviewboard server I get following error: *Error:* The patch to 'filename' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.PIc4WJ' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.PIc4WJ/tmp7AAVW9 patch: malformed patch at line 10: When I looked at the patch I found that it really is malformed. So I created a dummy file checked it in, modified it and created a patch. As you can see below the entry near @@ -20,6 +29,14 @@ See these resources for further informat will make it malformed (I have marked that section bold but not sure whether it will show up as bold in every editor\browser). I have tried with latest version of RBTools (rbt), one version prior to that (post-review and rbt), and 0.4.1 (post-review). I have tried with 32 bit python and setup tools as well as 64 bit. I have diffutils-2.8.7-1. The only difference that I see is that other machines that I use where I have my code and generate diff are 32 bit machines while this one is 64 bit machine. Have you come across this issue before? How do I solve it? @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ New unittest features including test ski A much faster io module Automatic numbering of fields in the str.format() method Float repr improvements backported from 3.x + + +Note: A newer bugfix release, 2.7.4, is currently available. Its use is recommended over previous versions of 2.7. + +Python 2.7.3 was released on April 9, 2012. 2.7.3 includes fixes for several reported security issues in 2.7.2: issue 13703 (oCERT-2011-003, hash collision denial of service), issue 14234 (CVE-2012-0876, hash table collisions CPU usage DoS in the expat library), issue 14001 (CVE-2012-0845, SimpleXMLRPCServer denial of service), and issue 13885 (CVE-2011-3389, disabling of the CBC IV attack countermeasure in the _ssl module). + +The Python 2.7 series is scheduled to be the last major version in the 2.x series before 2.x moves into an extended maintenance period. The 2.7 series contains many of the features that were first released in Python 3.1. Improvements in this release include: + + * Tile support for Tkinter* * A backport of the memoryview object from 3.x* * Set literals* *@@ -20,6 +29,14 @@ See these resources for further informat* What's new in 2.7? Change log for this release. + +Note: A newer bugfix release, 2.7.4, is currently available. Its use is recommended over previous versions of 2.7. + +Python 2.7.3 was released on April 9, 2012. 2.7.3 includes fixes for several reported security issues in 2.7.2: issue 13703 (oCERT-2011-003, hash collision denial of service), issue 14234 (CVE-2012-0876, hash table collisions CPU usage DoS in the expat library), issue 14001 (CVE-2012-0845, SimpleXMLRPCServer denial of service), and issue 13885 (CVE-2011-3389, disabling of the CBC IV attack countermeasure in the _ssl module). + +The Python 2.7 series is scheduled to be the last major version in the 2.x series before 2.x moves into an extended maintenance period. The 2.7 series contains many of the features that were first released in Python 3.1. Improvements in this release include: + + Online Documentation Report bugs at http://bugs.python.org. Help fund Python and its community. \ No newline at end of file -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Malformed Diff
Hi, I am using revieweboard and when I create diff using either post-review or rbt, and upload that diff in reviewboard server I get following error: *Error:* The patch to 'filename' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.PIc4WJ' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.PIc4WJ/tmp7AAVW9 patch: malformed patch at line 10: When I looked at the patch I found that it really is malformed. So I created a dummy file checked it in, modified it and created a patch. As you can see below the entry near @@ -20,6 +29,14 @@ See these resources for further informat will make it malformed (I have marked that section bold but not sure whether it will show up as bold in every editor\browser). I have tried with latest version of RBTools (rbt), one version prior to that (post-review and rbt), and 0.4.1 (post-review). I have tried with 32 bit python and setup tools as well as 64 bit. I have diffutils-2.8.7-1. The only difference that I see is that other machines that I use where I have my code and generate diff are 32 bit machines while this one is 64 bit machine. Have you come across this issue before? How do I solve it? @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ New unittest features including test ski A much faster io module Automatic numbering of fields in the str.format() method Float repr improvements backported from 3.x + + +Note: A newer bugfix release, 2.7.4, is currently available. Its use is recommended over previous versions of 2.7. + +Python 2.7.3 was released on April 9, 2012. 2.7.3 includes fixes for several reported security issues in 2.7.2: issue 13703 (oCERT-2011-003, hash collision denial of service), issue 14234 (CVE-2012-0876, hash table collisions CPU usage DoS in the expat library), issue 14001 (CVE-2012-0845, SimpleXMLRPCServer denial of service), and issue 13885 (CVE-2011-3389, disabling of the CBC IV attack countermeasure in the _ssl module). + +The Python 2.7 series is scheduled to be the last major version in the 2.x series before 2.x moves into an extended maintenance period. The 2.7 series contains many of the features that were first released in Python 3.1. Improvements in this release include: + + * Tile support for Tkinter* * A backport of the memoryview object from 3.x* * Set literals* *@@ -20,6 +29,14 @@ See these resources for further informat* What's new in 2.7? Change log for this release. + +Note: A newer bugfix release, 2.7.4, is currently available. Its use is recommended over previous versions of 2.7. + +Python 2.7.3 was released on April 9, 2012. 2.7.3 includes fixes for several reported security issues in 2.7.2: issue 13703 (oCERT-2011-003, hash collision denial of service), issue 14234 (CVE-2012-0876, hash table collisions CPU usage DoS in the expat library), issue 14001 (CVE-2012-0845, SimpleXMLRPCServer denial of service), and issue 13885 (CVE-2011-3389, disabling of the CBC IV attack countermeasure in the _ssl module). + +The Python 2.7 series is scheduled to be the last major version in the 2.x series before 2.x moves into an extended maintenance period. The 2.7 series contains many of the features that were first released in Python 3.1. Improvements in this release include: + + Online Documentation Report bugs at http://bugs.python.org. Help fund Python and its community. \ No newline at end of file -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Updating Perforce Ticket Every 24 hours
Hi, From what I understand to use perforce with reviewboard, I have to login with p4 -a -p, take the ticket that this command outputs to the screen, and put it in the password field in reviewboard. Problem is tickets that are generated in my organization expire in 24 hours (and we cannot have account whose ticket does not expire). That means whichever user we will choose, he\she will need to do this process every day. I want to automate this process. Is there a script or facility available with reviewboard or with someone who has faced this problem which automates this process? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Updating Perforce Ticket Every 24 hours
I know that's the usual procedure but that's not going to work because my organization do not want to create automation account which has read-only access. So I am taking another route.. to use user's account who already has read-only access... Now, since Christian said there is ticket based auth, I thought that user will give their perforce creds once and then reviewboard will take care of ticket based auth. Am I assuming correctly? On Monday, December 30, 2013 12:13:27 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: You configure Review Board with one perforce user account (usually an automation account of some sort). That account needs permission to read changes and files, but doesn't write. Individual users don't enter their own perforce credentials. -David On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:39 PM, neel roy neelsn...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Perfect. I have not decided which version to install but now it has to be 1.7.x :) BTW, before looking in the documentation I think the procedure would be that user gives his\her own password in password field (which reviewboard stores somewhere I guess), and enable ticket based auth and that's it? On Monday, December 30, 2013 12:03:52 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Neel, What version of Review Board are you running? Modern 1.7.x releases have a checkbox for enabling ticket-based auth, and will auto-fetch a ticket as needed. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:30 PM, neel roy neelsn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, From what I understand to use perforce with reviewboard, I have to login with p4 -a -p, take the ticket that this command outputs to the screen, and put it in the password field in reviewboard. Problem is tickets that are generated in my organization expire in 24 hours (and we cannot have account whose ticket does not expire). That means whichever user we will choose, he\she will need to do this process every day. I want to automate this process. Is there a script or facility available with reviewboard or with someone who has faced this problem which automates this process? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Reviewboard does not like big files?
Hello, I am trying to use Reviewboard. On most cases it works fine but we have one file with around 5 line\2.5 MB - C#. Everytime I submit diff for this file, no matter how big or small the diff is, the swirlie never stops spinning and diff is NEVER displayed. Is this known problem and do we have resolution for this? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Final procedure for perforce integration?
Hmmm.. I completely misunderstood - I was under the impression that someone, namely you, were ready to work on change and needed help setup-wise. no matter. I will try to find time. In interest of saving time, do we have ANY kind of code documentation? basically what I am trying to do is to use logged in user's credentials to log in to perforce - I have seen perforce python class but I have no idea of code flow (sorry if I am sounding lazy - I am:)) Thanks in advance, -Neel. On Monday, 14 May 2012 04:25:00 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Neel, The procedure to get it into Review Board? We'd need a patch developed that worked with p4 ticketing but without breaking user/pass access, and it'd need to be uploaded to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/. We can then review it, and once we're satisfied, put it into a release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Neel. neelag...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Christian, What's the procedure? I will need to let organization I work for know that before going forward. Thanks, -Neel. On Thursday, 12 April 2012 20:33:22 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Neel, We really need to land a patch for proper ticket-based auth. The problem is that the existing patches broke existing Perforce accounts, as the tickets were assumed to be used. I need someone with an actual setup to test this and fix up a patch. I'll happily work with them on getting it into a 1.6.x release. Christian On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:11, Neel. neelag...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I have been setting my ticket (p4 login -a -p) as password EVERY day; ticket expires after 24 hours in my organization. I wanted to know have any other way have been finalized other than creating a user that has non-expiring ticket? I have searched lot about this and there are few review requests for reviewboard to make it password based or ticket based without needing user intervention but nothing seemed to have shipped it yet. Also, reviewboard is in domain and\or user is using his active directory username in domain\user format, and that same username \password is valid for perforce, is there a way to reuse that (possibly using some hooks?)? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscribe@ **googlegroups.com reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Final procedure for perforce integration?
Hi Christian, What's the procedure? I will need to let organization I work for know that before going forward. Thanks, -Neel. On Thursday, 12 April 2012 20:33:22 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Neel, We really need to land a patch for proper ticket-based auth. The problem is that the existing patches broke existing Perforce accounts, as the tickets were assumed to be used. I need someone with an actual setup to test this and fix up a patch. I'll happily work with them on getting it into a 1.6.x release. Christian On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:11, Neel. neelag...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I have been setting my ticket (p4 login -a -p) as password EVERY day; ticket expires after 24 hours in my organization. I wanted to know have any other way have been finalized other than creating a user that has non-expiring ticket? I have searched lot about this and there are few review requests for reviewboard to make it password based or ticket based without needing user intervention but nothing seemed to have shipped it yet. Also, reviewboard is in domain and\or user is using his active directory username in domain\user format, and that same username \password is valid for perforce, is there a way to reuse that (possibly using some hooks?)? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Final procedure for perforce integration?
Hello, I have been setting my ticket (p4 login -a -p) as password EVERY day; ticket expires after 24 hours in my organization. I wanted to know have any other way have been finalized other than creating a user that has non-expiring ticket? I have searched lot about this and there are few review requests for reviewboard to make it password based or ticket based without needing user intervention but nothing seemed to have shipped it yet. Also, reviewboard is in domain and\or user is using his active directory username in domain\user format, and that same username \password is valid for perforce, is there a way to reuse that (possibly using some hooks?)? Thanks in advance, -Neel. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
