Re: CSCholesterol article

2010-10-06 Thread Smitty
Thanks, Gayla. I found  most of what I was seeking here =
*http://tinyurl.com/6mbrv5*
*
*
*Smitty*

 Try Googling cholesterol+linus+pauling
 Gayla



 I read a one paragraph about cholesterol being the body's
 way of repairing veins and arteryies that have weak walls.
 BUT, I lost it. .  does anyone have it ?
 I want to save it to send to friends who are taking meds
 to lower their cholesterol and disregarding their health,
 where the real culprit lies.
 That was a good article.

 Smitty




Re: CSCholesterol article

2010-10-06 Thread Gayla Roberts
Thanks Smitty. Good reading.
Most people never think about the constant expansion of the arteries as wear 
and tear. If they go unrepaired we would bleed to death. The body slaps bubble 
gum on them and it makes a bump in the artery. Then we have blockage. And 
since it does not fix the root of the problem, it gets worse.
Gayla
  - Original Message - 
  From: Smitty 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:12 AM
  Subject: Re: CSCholesterol article


  Thanks, Gayla. I found  most of what I was seeking here =
  http://tinyurl.com/6mbrv5


  Smitty


Try Googling cholesterol+linus+pauling
Gayla




  I read a one paragraph about cholesterol being the body's 
  way of repairing veins and arteryies that have weak walls.
  BUT, I lost it. .  does anyone have it ?
  I want to save it to send to friends who are taking meds
  to lower their cholesterol and disregarding their health,
  where the real culprit lies.
  That was a good article.


  Smitty 





Re: CSCholesterol article

2010-10-06 Thread Tony Moody
Google it !? 

On 5 Oct 2010 at 12:58, Smitty wrote about :
Subject : CSCholesterol article

 
 I read a one paragraph about cholesterol being the body's way of
 repairing veins and arteryies that 
 have weak walls. 
 BUT, I lost it. . does anyone have it ? 
 I want to save it to send to friends who are taking meds 
 to lower their cholesterol and disregarding their health, 
 where the real culprit lies. 
 That was a good article. 
 Smitty



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe
Archives: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
List Owner: Mike Devour mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com




CSCholesterol article

2010-10-05 Thread Smitty
I read a one paragraph about cholesterol being the body's
way of repairing veins and arteryies that have weak walls.
BUT, I lost it. .  does anyone have it ?
I want to save it to send to friends who are taking meds
to lower their cholesterol and disregarding their health,
where the real culprit lies.
That was a good article.

Smitty


Re: CSCholesterol article

2010-10-05 Thread Gayla Roberts
Try Googling cholesterol+linus+pauling
Gayla
  - Original Message - 
  From: Smitty 
  To: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com 
  Cc: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:58 PM
  Subject: CSCholesterol article


  I read a one paragraph about cholesterol being the body's
  way of repairing veins and arteryies that have weak walls.
  BUT, I lost it. .  does anyone have it ?
  I want to save it to send to friends who are taking meds
  to lower their cholesterol and disregarding their health,
  where the real culprit lies.
  That was a good article.


  Smitty 



CScholesterol

2010-10-04 Thread PT Ferrance
Hi,
Thanks to everyone who wrote in response to my query about cholesterol.  I have 
passed on the information with instructions to research those areas.
PT

CSCholesterol Levels article

2007-09-11 Thread Ruth Bertella
This may (or may not) help with those of y'all concerned with cholesterol.  
Hope it helps!

http://health.msn.com/general/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=10068GT1=10405

Re: CSCholesterol Magic Numbers-Too Low-Too High-What's the cause?

2007-09-07 Thread Ekowal459
 
 
I've written extensively on cholesterol  and I'd be worried if mine dipped to 
120s territory too Wayne. I guess you  could look at it hoping that in fact 
it's just your body needing less like  Dee mentioned, everybody's different BUT 
I'm wondering if you aren't  consuming some type of food or supplement that 
contains a naturally  occurring statin like some sort of yeast product. Yeasts 
sometimes contain  statins which inhibit the natural production of cholesterol 
in the  body[One reason why statin drugs are effective-effectively bad for 
you].  We get our Lipitors and Crestors as the pharmaceutical descendents  of 
yeast products and there are a lot of ''health'' foods and  supplements that 
contain yeasts of different kinds and possibly statins.  Also, although it can 
be 
a great supplemental mineral, an excessive  amount of the trace mineral 
Vanadium might inhibit cholesterol production  too. A symptom of vanadium 
deficiency is high blood cholesterol but the  excess is low total body 
cholesterol. I 
just wanted to chime in just in  case you take large amounts of yeast products 
or vanadium. The current  newsletter I've been circulating for the past few 
months has compiled  everything I've written on the subject and I've personally 
concluded after  extensive research that for numbers dipping down to even 180 
NATURALLY  for those who are essentially healthy people that it's probably  
okay and that there's sense to the view that some people may need less in  
their 
blood or just be USING cholesterol more efficiently, dispensing it  to cells 
and sending it back to the liver for recycling so well that the  blood level 
seems slightly low, etc. but that numbers going down  to BELOW 160 probably 
aren't healthy for anyone and there's probably  a good reason they're down that 
far. I think you said you're eating  less red meat? and perhaps that's more 
your natural food source and  that your body is built to rely more on dietary 
cholesterol than other  peoples might be.
 
Also, have you ever done a  liver/gallbladder flush? I know these can do 
wonders for truly ''high''  cholesterol[when you might actually have it] and 
triglycerides but perhaps  it might bring a low cholesterol UP since it 
improves 
liver function  and the liver metabolizes it to send back to the blood for it's 
 
necessary use in all of your cells. If anybody would like a copy of my  
digest on cholesterol, they can subscribe to my free newsletter by  writing 
_ninetyplus4l...@aol.com_ (mailto:ninetyplus4l...@aol.com)  with  ''Free Sub
scription'' in the subject line and I'd be happy to add them to  the list and 
send out 
a copy. It goes into detail on why you should keep  your cholesterol UP and 
what all statin drugs can do to damage you and all  the different doctors that 
have been fighting the twisted but lucrative  propaganda on the subject. We've 
shared a lot of our info sources on this  list to each other like William 
Douglass and Mary Enig and there  certainly doesn't seem to be a shortage of 
learned people  concerned with low cholesterol and I'm 100% with them thinking  
it's a very valid concern. Good luck with it Wayne. Sorry it took me  so long 
to 
comment on this too, I just got a notice of a nearly full  mail box this 
afternoon so I'm really behind reading the  list. 
 

JD- author of the 90+ Newsletter and Blog
_http://journals.aol.com/ninetyplus4life/Capacity/_ 
(http://journals.aol.com/ninetyplus4life/Capacity/) 





** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour


Re: CSCholesterol Magic Numbers, Are there any ?

2007-09-06 Thread faith gagne


- Original Message - 
From: CWFugitt c_wa...@earthlink.net

To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:09 PM
Subject: CSCholesterol Magic Numbers, Are there any ?



Evening Faith.

At 01:45 PM 9/5/2007, you wrote:
Okay.  I missed the joke part.  No sense of humor I guess.  Perhaps I 
think everyone has high cholesterol because I do.  Supposedly.  Besides, 
I will confess I couldn't think of anything else to say.  I am glad you 
are cholesterol free.


  She better not be Cholesterol Free.  I think that would be a disaster.

  How high is your cholesterol ?

  It may not in fact even be high.   The numbers are a fraud for sure.  I 
can send some links about this.


  I am concerned about mine being so low.  The other numbers that have 
served me well all my life is what I would like to have.

165 to 185 or even 200.

Wayne




Hi Wayne.

It took me a little while to answer this message becaue I wanted to look up 
my cholesterol level.  It was last measured almost 2 years ago.  My 
Cholesterol was 262  and my LDL cholesterol was 191.  They've always been 
high.  It hasn't been measured again becaue I cannot tolerate  the 
cholesterol drugs.


Faith
Don't believe everything you think.




.


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com




CSCholesterol Magic Numbers, Are there any ?

2007-09-05 Thread CWFugitt

Evening Faith.

At 01:45 PM 9/5/2007, you wrote:
Okay.  I missed the joke part.  No sense of humor I guess.  Perhaps I 
think everyone has high cholesterol because I 
do.  Supposedly.  Besides,  I will confess I couldn't think of anything 
else to say.  I am glad you are cholesterol free.


  She better not be Cholesterol Free.  I think that would be a disaster.

  How high is your cholesterol ?

  It may not in fact even be high.   The numbers are a fraud for sure.  I 
can send some links about this.


  I am concerned about mine being so low.  The other numbers that have 
served me well all my life is what I would like to have.

165 to 185 or even 200.

Wayne


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


Re: CSCholesterol levels, are they Frauds ?

2007-07-04 Thread Deborah Gerard
Thanks so much Wayne...are your homocysteine levels ever been checked? mine 
were pretty high for awhile...deb   
CWFugitt c_wa...@earthlink.net wrote:  Evening Debbie,

At 08:05 PM 7/3/2007, you wrote:
  it is okay for levels to be between 200 and 300. 
  This is one alternative doctor's opinion. 
( William Campbell Douglass, MD )

Cholesterol in the blood does not come from the food we eat is why low 
cholesterol diets don't work.

I think it is a symptom, not a cause.  If cholesterol levels are way our of 
range, this indicates a number of other things are wrong.

Seems I remember when normal was considered to be 240.

The highest mine has ever been was 214.  In later years it was 165 to 185 which 
I fear may be too low.

I also wonder about the LDL and HDL myth.  Reason being, me and most of my 
healthy friends have about the same numbers, 39 to 43.


   
-
Building a website is a piece of cake. 
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.

CScholesterol / doctors / thieves / hospitals

2007-07-04 Thread CWFugitt

Evening Jeanine,

At 01:53 PM 7/4/2007, you wrote:

Okay Gang - got to jump in on this one guys...

   A classic message, right out of the book.  Not sure which book.

Have you ever heard of a firing squad for doctors?  You want to be on the 
team ?


 I refuse of course.  I start back on a strict regimen of lecithin and 
red yeast rice..


I purchased some red rice yeast several years ago. I realized I did not 
even need it.


I had a friend in Lawrenceville, GA.  Young,  strong, walked 25 miles per 
week and could bench press 300 pounds.


He went to a doctor ( a friend ) and his cholesterol was high.
The doctor prescribed something.  He did not take it. He took the material 
I sent him instead.  Cholesterol came down 100 points in one month.  He 
went back to the doctor, but did not tell him what he did.   I realize that 
was not totally fair.  Maybe he knew him well enough he did not want to get 
into a sparring match.


 Now - I may have a case for fraud here.  You see this doctor (the first 
doctor) had told me at one time that he was really good friends with a 
pharmaceutical supply / salesman.


They are guilty every day.

One more little story.  Years back I got my boss on the nutrition 
bandwagon. Later our secretary had a thyroid problem.


She started talking the same vitamins we used. Nothing special.
Next time she had blood work done, the doctor called and said,
The lab messed up your blood work, we have to do it again.

Second time, same thing, Normal thyroid.

He said he had never seen an abnormal thyroid return to normal.
This meant of course he had never cured a single patient, and did not 
intend to do so.


He did ask what she had been doing, she told him, and he said he would 
recommend it to other people.  I doubt that he did, it would have been 
against the law.  The AMA law,  and he could be fined and loose his license.


All this proves the world is not what we thing, but the Medical Profession 
is exactly what we think it is.  ( some of us anyway )


Wayne




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


CSCholesterol levels, are they Frauds ?

2007-07-03 Thread CWFugitt

Evening Debbie,

At 08:05 PM 7/3/2007, you wrote:

it is okay for levels to be between 200 and 300.


  This is one alternative doctor's opinion.
( William Campbell Douglass, MD )

Cholesterol in the blood does not come from the food we eat is why low 
cholesterol diets don't work.


I think it is a symptom, not a cause.  If cholesterol levels are way our of 
range, this indicates a number of other things are wrong.


Seems I remember when normal was considered to be 240.

The highest mine has ever been was 214.  In later years it was 165 to 185 
which I fear may be too low.


I also wonder about the LDL and HDL myth.  Reason being, me and most of my 
healthy friends have about the same numbers, 39 to 43.


The sickest people I know in the world today have a HDL reading of in the 
50's.  One has cancer, one has bone disease, so bad he has a morphine pump 
installed in his body, and the third one has

Lou Gehrig's Disease.   Go Figure !

I had a long talk with a young cardiologist in a friends hospital room.
He was bragging about his cholesterol being 165 and the drug he used.  I 
said,  Mine is 165 and I don't take any drugs.


I asked him about his homocysteine.  He said, If you are worried about 
that, you need to take this, this , and that.
I replied, I am not worried about mine, I know what it is. I am surprised 
you do not know.


Not often do you find a doctor of any kind willing to engage in a
bull session.  It was fun to say the least.

Here is a great website run by a great guy. I have communicated with him in 
the past.  ( Barry Groves )

http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/

He has many good articles, including one on The Cholesterol Fraud.

Try it, you will find many great things.

Wayne











Re: CSCholesterol again

2007-03-21 Thread Dee
Thanks for replying Terry, what you have said is very similar to what I have
learned via Mercola and Chris Gupta.  Dee  
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Terry Chamberlin
Date: 03/19/07 22:43:33
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CSCholesterol again
 
Dee said,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/conditions/cholesterol1.shtml
  I found this article on the web Terry, and looking at
what you have written, it is mainly wrong!  Could you
have a look and see what you think?  If it is wrong,
then how can such as the BBC publish such nonsense?  
 
The BBC will publish whatever the official position is
on pretty much everything, the same as the mainline
media does in North America.
 
The problem concerning what the medical establishment
tells us nowadays about heart disease originally
started with some fairly logical but erroneous
early-century science.
 

CScholesterol, Milk and Eggs

2007-03-19 Thread CWFugitt

At 10:31 AM 3/19/2007, you wrote:

I didn't think there *was* any cholesterol in food only eggs and prawns 
and eggs have lecithin to balance this.  Dee


Why do you think it needs balancing?

One great doctors says a reading of 300 to 400 is about right.

I know a weight lifter and runner whose reading is 400 plus and has been 
for 20 years.


The highest mine has ever been was 212 and I used to eat 6 raw eggs per day 
and one gallon of milk.


Milk is a super food and always has been.  Then man comes along and adds 
hormones, chemicals, and destroys the fat molecules to create defective 
cell membrane walls.


Recently I heard a story of a man who weighed over 300 pounds, had heart 
problems, edema, and diabetes.


He cured all of them with RAW MILK.

Read the 1929 article from the Mayo clinic about the people treated with 
nothing but milk.

http://www.fugitt.com/realmilk.htm

Cholesterol is not evil but a necessary nutrient.

The Cholesterol Scam is the biggest financial rip off in the history of 
modern civilization.


Wayne




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


CSCholesterol!

2007-03-19 Thread Terry Chamberlin
On the subject of cholesterol, I've resisted it, but
it seems I must have my rant.

There are many articles available concerning the
inaccuracy of the modern view of cholesterol. These
articles cite various studies going all the way back
to when the Theory of Cholesterol concerning heart
disease was first promoted by medical/pharmaceutical
authorities. These articles tend to emphasize various
and numerous research findings, all quite valid, all
very scientific and all a bit complicated and
technical. Contact me directly to acquire copies of
these articles.

I want to examine the Cholesterol Myth from a
different angle, using plain language and minimizing
the technical.

Everyone in our society understands how high
cholesterol causes heart disease. We have all been
taught practically from infancy about the dangers of
consuming too much cholesterol.

So let’s look at it again.

OK, here’s how it goes: If you eat too much
cholesterol, the excess cholesterol that your body
doesn’t use will float around in your blood stream
and, because it is a sticky fat, will begin to adhere
to the insides of your blood stream walls. As this
layer of sticky cholesterol continues to accumulate on
your blood vessel walls, the corridor through which
your blood is flowing will become narrower and
narrower. Your blood will become more and more
restricted in its flow, until some part of your body
that needs a lot of blood (usually your heart,
sometimes your brain) will be impaired in its function
because of insufficient blood supply. In the case of
your heart, you will either experience angina (heart
pain from insufficient blood supply) or a heart attack
(part of your heart dies from insufficient blood and
the oxygen it supplies).

In addition to these two events, there are
accompanying problems such as high blood pressure. We
understand high BP to be caused by the layers of
cholesterol on the blood vessel walls making them
rigid and inflexible and interfering with healthy
blood pressure regulation.

That about sums it up, doesn’t it? Isn’t that how
you’ve been given to understand it?

Let’s look closer at this theory.

Let’s say that you are concerned about your blood
cholesterol level. You go to your doctor and say,
“Doc, I want to know how high my cholesterol is.” He
sticks a needle in your arm, takes out some blood and
sends it to a laboratory to have it tested. 

First question: What does the doc take the blood out
of, an artery or a vein? He takes it out of a vein.

Have you ever heard of hardening of the veins?
Veinerosclerosis? If the sticky cholesterol sticks to
the sides of the blood vessel walls, why doesn’t it
stick to the walls of the veins?

The reason is that the body doesn’t want it to. The
body WANTS the cholesterol to stick to the sides of
the arteries. The cholesterol that is accumulating on
the sides of the artery walls is NOT the cholesterol
you eat, it is primarily cholesterol produced by the
liver in response to an imbalanced metabolic condition
the body is trying to cope with.

Why would the body do that?

The explanation you will next read comes from the
teachings of the late Dr. Carey Reams,
biophysicist/biochemist.

To understand the big picture of health and nutrition,
the bottom line is this: We are MADE of minerals. (1)
We are not made of vitamins or enzymes or hormones or
herbs, we are made of minerals. I think that nearly
everyone knows that our bodies are made up of 80%
water. I weigh 175 lbs., so if all the water in my
body was removed, there would be about 35 lbs. of
powder left. What would this powder consist of?
Minerals. I think nearly everyone also knows that the
foods we buy in the store don't have much nutrition in
them (minerals), because of what has been done to the
soil by commercial farming.

Every day our bodies use up a certain amount of
minerals just to function, yet we are not fully
replacing those minerals with the commercially-grown
foods we eat. It's a bit like a checking account I
once had, where if I wrote a check for more than the
money that was in the checking account, it would
automatically dip into the money in my savings
account. They called it Overdraft Protection. But we
have all been doing this same thing all our lives with
our Metabolic Bank Accounts. Every day that you
deposit less into your body's account than the
“checks” your body writes that day, you dip into your
savings account. When I do not give my body the
minerals it needs that day, my body steals the
minerals it needs from other places throughout my
body. So, if my chemistry has become unbalanced in one
particular way, my body will steal minerals from my
joints, and I will end up with arthritis, bursitis,
fibromyalgia, osteoporosis, etc. 

Or, if my body has a chemistry imbalance of another
kind, it will leach minerals from the linings of my
arteries, and I will contract heart disease. 

Why from the linings of my arteries? Because the
arteries are surrounded by a layer of muscle tissue
that is there to 

Re: CScholesterol, Milk and Eggs

2007-03-19 Thread Dee
I do realize this, its just that I had always understood that cholesterol
was not in food, but produced by the liver.  As Terry has explained
comprehensively, and I did already know, this cholesterol is used to repair
and is necessary for life.  I too have read about the cholesterol scam and
am always trying to tell people about it, but they don't often listen as
they get their info from their GP's.  Dee  
 
---Original Message---
 
Cholesterol is not evil but a necessary nutrient.
 
The Cholesterol Scam is the biggest financial rip off in the history of
modern civilization.
 
Wayne
 
 
 
 
--

Re: CSCholesterol!

2007-03-19 Thread Dee
http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/conditions/cholesterol1.shtml I found this
article on the web Terry, and looking at what you have written, it is mainly
wrong!  Could you have a look and see what you think?  If it is wrong, then
how can such as the BBC publish such nonsense?  Dee  
 
---Original Message---
 
From: Terry Chamberlin
Date: 03/19/07 17:19:22
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CSCholesterol!
 
On the subject of cholesterol, I've resisted it, but
it seems I must have my rant.
 
There are many articles available concerning the
inaccuracy of the modern view of cholesterol. These
articles cite various studies going all the way back
to when the Theory of Cholesterol concerning heart
disease was first promoted by medical/pharmaceutical
authorities. These articles tend to emphasize various
and numerous research findings, all quite valid, all
very scientific and all a bit complicated and
technical. Contact me directly to acquire copies of
these articles.
 
I want to examine the Cholesterol Myth from a
different angle, using plain language and minimizing
the technical.
 

CSCholesterol! ( cardiologist conversation )

2007-03-19 Thread CWFugitt


Talk with a Cardiologist..



OK, here's how it goes: If you eat too much
cholesterol, the excess cholesterol that your body
doesn't use will float around in your blood stream
and, because it is a sticky fat, will begin to adhere
to the insides of your blood stream walls.


  Why would anyone believe this when the whole Cholesterol smear
is a fraud, a lie, and a scam?

Give the body a little credit for intelligence as to knowing what to do 
with excess.


I feel sure I drink too much water at times but the body knows just how to 
handle it.


In addition, . I firmly believe the body is as intelligent as 
the plants I grow.


I increase potassium and magnesium.  Some plants take it and some plants 
leave it.


I can flow nutrients over the roots ALL DAY LONG and the plants take what 
they need and the excess does not hurt, as long as they are in the proper 
ratio, right type, right acidity, and do no damage to the roots or media.


I have read that NOT a single study proves that cholesterol causes heart 
disease.


Few people have only one thing wrong.  If one thing is out of balance, many 
others usually are as well.


I do not believe that any single thing causes anything or any single thing 
cures anything.  Body chemistry is more complicated than that.


I had a long talk with a cardiologist visiting a friend who just had a 
heart attack.   This guy was talkative ,  talking about everything 
from  land, horses, real estate, and finally cholesterol.


He was bragging about his cholesterol being 160 and the drugs he was taking.

I said, ... mine is 160 and I don't take any drug.

I asked him about homocysteine.  He said, if you are worried about that, 
take this, this , and that.


I said, I am not worried about mine, I know what it is and I am surprised 
you don't.  Homocysteine has more effect on heart disease than cholesterol.


He was friendly and in a good mood.  Not often do you find one of these 
with time to talk and shoot the bull.


Fact is, I knew everything he said, and then some.

Later he came back to see my friend and wanted to know who the wise guy was 
that was there the other day.


I won't tell you what my friend told him.

Again, the condition may be true and exist but I doubt that the cause is 
cholesterol.  Other things effect what happens to cholesterol within the 
blood stream.


Further,  some articles state the cholesterol does not come from the food 
we eat, it is all manufactured by the body.


==

As this
layer of sticky cholesterol continues to accumulate on
your blood vessel walls, the corridor through which
your blood is flowing will become narrower and
narrower. Your blood will become more and more
restricted in its flow, until some part of your body
that needs a lot of blood (usually your heart,
sometimes your brain) will be impaired in its function
because of insufficient blood supply. In the case of
your heart, you will either experience angina (heart
pain from insufficient blood supply) or a heart attack
(part of your heart dies from insufficient blood and
the oxygen it supplies).







--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


CSCholesterol again

2007-03-19 Thread Terry Chamberlin
Dee said,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/conditions/cholesterol1.shtml
 I found this article on the web Terry, and looking at
what you have written, it is mainly wrong!  Could you
have a look and see what you think?  If it is wrong,
then how can such as the BBC publish such nonsense?  

The BBC will publish whatever the official position is
on pretty much everything, the same as the mainline
media does in North America.

The problem concerning what the medical establishment
tells us nowadays about heart disease originally
started with some fairly logical but erroneous
early-century science.

During the early 1900’s, various manifestations of
heart disease began to occur. The first few cases of
it were misdiagnosed because the doctors had never
seen it before. As the incidents of it began to
increase, the medical scientists began to pay closer
attention to it. They discovered that every case of
heart disease was accompanied by high blood
cholesterol, and they came to the conclusion that high
blood cholesterol caused heart disease. 

In reality, they got the cart before the horse. Heart
disease causes high cholesterol, not the other way
around.

By the time the doctors discovered their error (well
over 30 years ago), two things had occurred. 

First, they couldn’t very well come out with a public
statement like, “Whoops! Hey, folks, we got it
backwards, but it’s OK, we have it right now and you
can trust us again.” The medical High Priesthood never
apologizes nor admits to error.

Secondly, there was a burgeoning, highly-profitable
poly-unsaturated oil industry, plus the doctors were
making major dollars doing heart surgeries and other
expensive heart disease treatments (not to mention
lucrative statin and other drugs).

Eighty years ago there was a health issue that
occasionally occurred in seniors, but which has become
the number two killer of seniors today. I’m talking
about Alzheimers disease (AL). For about 80 years or
so the doctors have been warning us away from
“high-cholesterol” foods, and the public has dutifully
complied. But if your body doesn’t get the cholesterol
it needs from your diet, it will scavenge it from the
best sources it can find within the body. Guess where
the largest reservoir of cholesterol is in your body?
Your brain is composed of 70% cholesterol!

Now let me see: 80 or so years ago AL was quite
uncommon. For the last 80 or so years folks have been
running from eggs, butter, etc. Today AL is the number
two killer of seniors. I can do the math.

When a client tells me they have high blood pressure
or heart disease, I put them on 2 eggs per day,
minimum. Of course, I impress on them the importance
of buying eggs from healthy, back-yard chickens that
run around and eat like they were designed to do.

Terry Chamberlin


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   


Re: CSCholesterol again

2007-03-19 Thread Barbara
Terry, what happened in the early 1900s that it had such profound and 
disastrous influence on the health of the citizens? 
I know that milk pasteurization started at that time.  Could that be a reason?  

Barbara



  During the early 1900's, various manifestations of
  heart disease began to occur. The first few cases of
  it were misdiagnosed because the doctors had never
  seen it before. 

  Terry Chamberlin



Re: CSCholesterol again

2007-03-19 Thread Smitty

I have read that pasteurized milk is BAD for a person's body.
Maybe Terry can expound on this.

Smitty



On 3/19/07, Barbara barba...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:



Terry, what happened in the early 1900s that it had such profound and
disastrous influence on the health of the citizens?
I know that milk pasteurization started at that time.  Could that be a
reason?

Barbara



During the early 1900's, various manifestations of
heart disease began to occur. The first few cases of
it were misdiagnosed because the doctors had never
seen it before.

Terry Chamberlin





--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


Re: CSCholesterol again

2007-03-19 Thread Day Sutton

I have read that too, and that Homogonized milk is even worse...
from The Milk Book


On 3/19/07, Smitty papad...@gmail.com wrote:


I have read that pasteurized milk is BAD for a person's body.
Maybe Terry can expound on this.

Smitty



On 3/19/07, Barbara barba...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:


 Terry, what happened in the early 1900s that it had such profound and
 disastrous influence on the health of the citizens?
 I know that milk pasteurization started at that time.  Could that be a
 reason?

 Barbara



 During the early 1900's, various manifestations of
 heart disease began to occur. The first few cases of
 it were misdiagnosed because the doctors had never
 seen it before.

 Terry Chamberlin




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com






--
Day Sutton
day.sut...@gmail.com


Re: CSCholesterol again

2007-03-19 Thread dd611
Although I cannot find the source right now I have read somewhere that a 
farmer who fed a newborn calf only pasteurized milk had the calf get ill 
and die shortly after.

Dennis

Smitty wrote:

I have read that pasteurized milk is BAD for a person's body.
Maybe Terry can expound on this.

Smitty



On 3/19/07, Barbara barba...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:



Terry, what happened in the early 1900s that it had such profound and
disastrous influence on the health of the citizens?
I know that milk pasteurization started at that time.  Could that be a
reason?

Barbara



During the early 1900's, various manifestations of
heart disease began to occur. The first few cases of
it were misdiagnosed because the doctors had never
seen it before.

Terry Chamberlin





--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
 



CScholesterol

2006-07-01 Thread zeb caffe
I have deleted many posts but remember that someone had written about lowering 
their cholesterol naturally. Just wanted to pass this along. A friend of mine 
was having difficulty getting her cholesterol lowered and could not take the 
medication due to side effects.She has had good luck with something called Red 
rice yeast. It is a natural substance and really helped her.

-
Want to be your own boss? Learn how on  Yahoo! Small Business. 

CSCholesterol for Teri

2006-06-25 Thread Greg Ball
Hi Teri - two things that have brought down my husband and my cholesterol 
naturally and radically:

Protein power diet - We both eat this way and it makes a huge difference to our 
levels. 

Liver flushing - I was doing a Hulda Clark style liver flush for other 
reasons and a side effect was that my cholesterol was lowered significantly 
after doing a couple of them. You can find directions and info on 
www.curezone.comhttp://www.curezone.com/  There is some risk involved with 
it, so you should read the site carefully to make your decision about doing it. 
It's my understanding that a clogged up liver can be a cause of high 
cholesterol. 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.commailto:silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com 
  To: silver-dig...@eskimo.commailto:silver-dig...@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:31 AM
  Subject: silver-digest Digest V2006 #442



Re: CSCholesterol for Teri

2006-06-25 Thread Duncan Crow
World-reknowned cholesterol expert Uffe Ravnskov has a good 
website and book called the Cholesterol Myths. One of the myths 
he exposes is that cholesterol has never been proven to cause 
anything; rather, it's a response. Check his credentials; he's 
not kidding.

Duncan

On 25 Jun 2006 at 10:19, Greg Ball wrote:

 Hi Teri - two things that have brought down my husband and my cholesterol 
 naturally and radically:
 
 Protein power diet - We both eat this way and it makes a huge difference to 
 our levels. 
 
 Liver flushing - I was doing a Hulda Clark style liver flush for other 
 reasons and a side effect was that my cholesterol was lowered significantly 
 after doing a couple of them. You can find directions and info on 
 www.curezone.comhttp://www.curezone.com/  There is some risk involved with 
 it, so you should read the site carefully to make your decision about doing 
 it. It's my understanding that a clogged up liver can be a cause of high 
 cholesterol. 
 
   - Original Message - 
   From: 
 silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.commailto:silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com 
   To: silver-dig...@eskimo.commailto:silver-dig...@eskimo.com 
   Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 10:31 AM
   Subject: silver-digest Digest V2006 #442
 
 




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
   


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2006-01-03 Thread Marshall Dudley
grace1...@aol.com wrote:

  Sometimes people get the wrong idea about the Atkins diet, that it
 consists of only meat, cheese, fat, and so forth.  That would
 definitely not be healthy, although I know some people who do well on
 that, and some who don't.  Atkins himself said that after the initial
 breaking in period with his diet, that he recommends fruits and
 vegetables (complex carbohydrates), and that people have gotten the
 wrong idea about his diet.  That would leave out only sugar and
 refined carbohydrates, and there is much evidence to suggest that
 these are the culprits in weight gain, as well as many degenerative
 diseases.  The complex carbohydrates are healthy, and the more raw,
 organic food we eat, the better. One may choose to focus on those
 complex carbohydrates which have a lower glycemic index, however. Some
 people are unaware that the Atkins diet was not originally designed
 for the purpose of loosing weight. Atkins was experimenting with a
 diet that would treat serious illness, such as heart disease, cancer,
 diabetes, etc., that was recalcitrant to other treatments.  His famous
 diet worked outstandingly for these patients to return them to
 health.  The weight loss effect was noted later, as a side
 effect!   Nowadays, people often think that is its only purpose,
 and that benefits of loosing weight must be weighed against (sorry for
 the pun) the disadvantage of following this unhealthy diet. Jill

My wife who was a diabetic for almost 20 years went on the Adkins diet
about 2 years ago and is no longer diabetic.  She quit taking her pills
about 2 months into the diet, and has not needed to take them any more
since. In fact the doctor has even quit measuring her blood sugar.  In
addition she has lost a LOT of unneeded weight.

Marshall


CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread sol
Mine is sugar and carbs. I once was on a severely lowfat vegetarian diet 
for 9-10 months, lost 20 lbs but at the end of it, my triglycerides were 
sky high, and LDL was way up, HDL very low. At the time, my doctor said 
high triglycerides are a far more important indicator of heart attack 
risk than total cholesterol, particularly for women. This doctor did not 
believe I was not eating fats, and kept telling me to cut them out.


OTOH, a couple years later, after a short stint of strict Atkins (very 
high fat, lots of protein, no carbs, no sugar) my triglycerides dropped 
167 points, HDL was up, LDL a bit lower. Overall cholesterol numbers 
stayed about the same.

sol

 
I'm curious about the high readings for cholesterol and triglycerides 
that others in this group are experiencing.  What do some of you think 
the cause is?  For me personally the cause is...decaffinated coffee.  
When I get off of it, my readings have fallen to normal within 6 
months.  Then I got back on it, I was using 2 scoops of coffee to 2 
cups water, once or twice a day, and my triglycerides were really 
high.  Have heard caffinated coffee will affect cholesterol  
triglycerides less because of chemicals they use todecaffinatee coffee. 




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread Barbara
Atkins is a healthy way of eating.  It has been proven by studies in Europe, so 
he claims. 

Barbara



  OTOH, a couple years later, after a short stint of strict Atkins (very 
  high fat, lots of protein, no carbs, no sugar) my triglycerides dropped 
  167 points, HDL was up, LDL a bit lower. Overall cholesterol numbers 
  stayed about the same.
  sol



Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread epatai

Atkins is certainly NOT a healthy way of eating IMHO.
This makes the blood and the body's environment EXTREMELY acidic. which 
makes it a great host for future problems. our system is not designed to be 
acidic. The simple reason all these different diets have been created is 
because people are too lazy in most cases to exercise properly and daily. 
People want a fast and convenient way to lose weight. Proper diet means 
eating sensibly and complimenting this with regular proper exercise. In the 
beginning this requires some educating onself to understand foods or to see 
a nutritionist who does. Takes time as in months to allow the body to 
adjust and not shock it. We want immediate gratification now days. It 
doesn't take a few weeks to put on 50-100lbs..so it would make sense to 
understand it will take about as long to lose the same amount of weight.




From: Barbara barba...@tampabay.rr.com
Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:09:19 -0500

Atkins is a healthy way of eating.  It has been proven by studies in 
Europe, so he claims.


Barbara



  OTOH, a couple years later, after a short stint of strict Atkins (very
  high fat, lots of protein, no carbs, no sugar) my triglycerides dropped
  167 points, HDL was up, LDL a bit lower. Overall cholesterol numbers
  stayed about the same.
  sol





--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread ruth strackbein
from ruthstrackbein at hotmail.com: I have been eating a celiac type diet for about a year and a half. I have not been diagnosed with celiac, but it seemed a healthy way to go. I weighed around 150 lbs to start . Last time I was at the Dr.s it was 128 with clothes. At home I weigh 115-120. That has remained pretty steady. I eat chicken, turkey, fish, eggs, vegetables, no wheat, flour, barley, etc. I just do not eat bread. I do use a very little of the Fleischman's olive oil oleo. Get rid of skin and fat on chicken. Once in awhile I eat beef. My last cholesterol readings showed triglycerides 76, hdl was up a little, LDL remained the same as always which is on the high side. I can't remember the exact readings. But this has not helped my digestive problems at all. Think part may be due 
to adhesions from 3 abdominal surgeries. Any further information would be welcome. I do not eat sweets.
From Ruth Strackbein


From: epa...@sympatico.caReply-To: silver-list@eskimo.comTo: silver-list@eskimo.comSubject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacinDate: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:21:44 +Atkins is certainly NOT a healthy way of eating IMHO.This makes the blood and the body's environment EXTREMELY acidic. which makes it a great host for future problems. our system is not designed to be acidic. The simple reason all these different "diets" have been created is because people are too lazy in most cases to exercise properly and daily. People want a fast and convenient way to lose weight. Proper diet means eating sensibly and complimenting this with regular proper exercise. In the beginning this requires some educating onself to understand foods or to see a 
nutritionist who does. Takes "time" as in months to allow the body to adjust and not shock it. We want immediate gratification now days. It doesn't take a few weeks to put on 50-100lbs..so it would make sense to understand it will take about as long to lose the same amount of weight.From: "Barbara" barba...@tampabay.rr.comReply-To: silver-list@eskimo.comTo: silver-list@eskimo.comSubject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacinDate: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:09:19 -0500Atkins is a healthy way of eating. It has been proven by studies in Europe, so he claims.Barbara OTOH, a couple years later, after a short stint of strict Atkins 
(very high fat, lots of protein, no carbs, no sugar) my triglycerides dropped 167 points, HDL was up, LDL a bit lower. Overall cholesterol numbers stayed about the same. sol--The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.orgTo post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.comAddress Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.comThe Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread Barbara
Everyone is different metabolically.  Atkins suits me perfectly and I follow it 
for close to 2 years now.  

Barbara




  Atkins is certainly NOT a healthy way of eating IMHO.
  This makes the blood and the body's environment EXTREMELY acidic. which 
  makes it a great host for future problems. our system is not designed to be 
  acidic. 

Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread sol
What makes one person acidic doesn't mean that same thing will make 
every single human being on the planet acidic.
Check the book Metabolic Typing Diet. It discusses the acid/alkaline 
balance. Some of us achieve balance on a diet that would throw others 
out of whack.
There is a HUGE fallacy in thinking everyone needs or thrives or will 
achieve a good acid/alkaline balance on the same diet. It simply is not 
true. There is no laziness involved for me, at least.
Most nutritionists are far too likely to believe that there is only one 
diet that is best for everyone, so only SOME of their clients will 
thrive on their recommendations. Many will become worse.
FWIW, I did not go on Atkins to lose weight, but to feel better, and I 
did. Anyone who went on an Atkins low carb diet and felt worse would be 
a fool to continue. Just as it would have been foolish for me to stay on 
a low fat vegetarian diet.
Any understanding of food/how to eat is individual,  there is no one 
best way for everyone.

sol

epa...@sympatico.ca wrote:


Atkins is certainly NOT a healthy way of eating IMHO.
This makes the blood and the body's environment EXTREMELY acidic. 
which makes it a great host for future problems. our system is not 
designed to be acidic. The simple reason all these different diets 
have been created is because people are too lazy in most cases to 
exercise properly and daily. People want a fast and convenient way to 
lose weight. Proper diet means eating sensibly and complimenting this 
with regular proper exercise.



From: Barbara barba...@tampabay.rr.com
Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:09:19 -0500

Atkins is a healthy way of eating.  It has been proven by studies in 
Europe, so he claims.


Barbara



  OTOH, a couple years later, after a short stint of strict Atkins (very
  high fat, lots of protein, no carbs, no sugar) my triglycerides 
dropped

  167 points, HDL was up, LDL a bit lower. Overall cholesterol numbers
  stayed about the same.
  sol





--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
 






--
Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. Mark Twain 


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread epatai
you have some valid points.. But your theory or their theory on metabolic 
types is also inconsistant. It works for some but doesn't work for all. So 
if it is individual then one cannot say that one works for all. And if a 
holistic nutritionist opinion is in question? then we might as well throw 
all professional based thinking out the window and go back to the drawing 
board for ALL involved. You probably noticed I didn't mention dietician 
also limitted in thinking from my experience. I would humbly say that if 
someone has a condition, which ever that condition may be has to do their 
own dilegence homework but also keep an open mind enough to consider all 
methods in anything undertaken.


with all due respect.

Ernie



From: sol sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com
Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:20:24 -0700

What makes one person acidic doesn't mean that same thing will make every 
single human being on the planet acidic.
Check the book Metabolic Typing Diet. It discusses the acid/alkaline 
balance. Some of us achieve balance on a diet that would throw others out 
of whack.
There is a HUGE fallacy in thinking everyone needs or thrives or will 
achieve a good acid/alkaline balance on the same diet. It simply is not 
true. There is no laziness involved for me, at least.
Most nutritionists are far too likely to believe that there is only one 
diet that is best for everyone, so only SOME of their clients will thrive 
on their recommendations. Many will become worse.
FWIW, I did not go on Atkins to lose weight, but to feel better, and I did. 
Anyone who went on an Atkins low carb diet and felt worse would be a fool 
to continue. Just as it would have been foolish for me to stay on a low fat 
vegetarian diet.
Any understanding of food/how to eat is individual,  there is no one best 
way for everyone.

sol

epa...@sympatico.ca wrote:


Atkins is certainly NOT a healthy way of eating IMHO.
This makes the blood and the body's environment EXTREMELY acidic. which 
makes it a great host for future problems. our system is not designed to 
be acidic. The simple reason all these different diets have been created 
is because people are too lazy in most cases to exercise properly and 
daily. People want a fast and convenient way to lose weight. Proper diet 
means eating sensibly and complimenting this with regular proper exercise.



From: Barbara barba...@tampabay.rr.com
Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:09:19 -0500

Atkins is a healthy way of eating.  It has been proven by studies in 
Europe, so he claims.


Barbara



  OTOH, a couple years later, after a short stint of strict Atkins (very
  high fat, lots of protein, no carbs, no sugar) my triglycerides 
dropped

  167 points, HDL was up, LDL a bit lower. Overall cholesterol numbers
  stayed about the same.
  sol





--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com






--
Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause 
and reflect. Mark Twain




Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread Barbara
I agree with you sol.  I also feel better on Atkins and 
plan on staying on it for a lng time :)

Barbara



  FWIW, I did not go on Atkins to lose weight, but to feel better, and I 
  did. Anyone who went on an Atkins low carb diet and felt worse would be 
  a fool to continue. Just as it would have been foolish for me to stay on 
  a low fat vegetarian diet.
  Any understanding of food/how to eat is individual,  there is no one 
  best way for everyone.
  sol



Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread sol
I believe you are missing my point. I certainly did not mean to imply 
that a low carb high fat high animal protein diet is best for everyone.
According to the Metabolic Typing Diet one does some testing to 
determine one's basic metabolic type, then since there are a lot of 
variations within types/across types,  starts with a basic food plan for 
their basic type, and fine tunes from there. The fine tuning results in 
a very individualized diet, based on how one reacts on many levels. The 
iea is to find the diet that best maintains health for an individual. 
Most diets and books recommend one diet for everyone.
I spoke from my own prejudice. I've never personally run across anything 
written by a nutritionist that didn't have a one size fits all diet they 
gave to everyone.

sol

epa...@sympatico.ca wrote:

you have some valid points.. But your theory or their theory on 
metabolic types is also inconsistant. It works for some but doesn't 
work for all. So if it is individual then one cannot say that one 
works for all. And if a holistic nutritionist opinion is in question? 
then we might as well throw all professional based thinking out the 
window and go back to the drawing board for ALL involved. You 
probably noticed I didn't mention dietician also limitted in 
thinking from my experience. I would humbly say that if someone has a 
condition, which ever that condition may be has to do their own 
dilegence homework but also keep an open mind enough to consider all 
methods in anything undertaken.


with all due respect.

Ernie



From: sol sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com
Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:20:24 -0700

What makes one person acidic doesn't mean that same thing will make 
every single human being on the planet acidic.
Check the book Metabolic Typing Diet. It discusses the 
acid/alkaline balance. Some of us achieve balance on a diet that 
would throw others out of whack.
There is a HUGE fallacy in thinking everyone needs or thrives or will 
achieve a good acid/alkaline balance on the same diet. It simply is 
not true. There is no laziness involved for me, at least.
Most nutritionists are far too likely to believe that there is only 
one diet that is best for everyone, so only SOME of their clients 
will thrive on their recommendations. Many will become worse.
FWIW, I did not go on Atkins to lose weight, but to feel better, and 
I did. Anyone who went on an Atkins low carb diet and felt worse 
would be a fool to continue. Just as it would have been foolish for 
me to stay on a low fat vegetarian diet.
Any understanding of food/how to eat is individual,  there is no one 
best way for everyone.

sol

epa...@sympatico.ca wrote:


Atkins is certainly NOT a healthy way of eating IMHO.
This makes the blood and the body's environment EXTREMELY acidic. 
which makes it a great host for future problems. our system is not 
designed to be acidic. The simple reason all these different diets 
have been created is because people are too lazy in most cases to 
exercise properly and daily. People want a fast and convenient way 
to lose weight. Proper diet means eating sensibly and complimenting 
this with regular proper exercise.



From: Barbara barba...@tampabay.rr.com
Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:09:19 -0500

Atkins is a healthy way of eating.  It has been proven by studies 
in Europe, so he claims.


Barbara



  OTOH, a couple years later, after a short stint of strict Atkins 
(very
  high fat, lots of protein, no carbs, no sugar) my triglycerides 
dropped

  167 points, HDL was up, LDL a bit lower. Overall cholesterol numbers
  stayed about the same.
  sol





--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com






--
Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to 
pause and reflect. Mark Twain









--
Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. Mark Twain 


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread Grace1way
Sometimes people get the wrong idea about the Atkins diet, that it consists  
of only meat, cheese, fat, and so forth.  That would definitely not be  
healthy, although I know some people who do well on that, and some who  don't.  
Atkins himself said that after the initial breaking in period with  his diet, 
that 
he recommends fruits and vegetables (complex carbohydrates), and  that people 
have gotten the wrong idea about his diet.  That would leave  out only sugar 
and refined carbohydrates, and there is much evidence to suggest  that these 
are the culprits in weight gain, as well as many degenerative  diseases.  The 
complex carbohydrates are healthy, and the more raw, organic  food we eat, the 
better. One may choose to focus on those complex  carbohydrates which have a 
lower glycemic index, however. 
 
Some people are unaware that the Atkins diet was not originally designed  for 
the purpose of loosing weight. Atkins was experimenting with a diet that  
would treat serious illness, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, etc., 
that  
was recalcitrant to other treatments.  His famous diet worked outstandingly  
for these patients to return them to health.  The weight loss effect  was 
noted later, as a side effect!   Nowadays, people often think  that is its 
only purpose, and that benefits of loosing weight must be weighed  against 
(sorry 
for the pun) the disadvantage of following this unhealthy  diet.
 
Jill


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread sol
Quite right. I did forgot to mention my raw veggies, salads, limited 
fruits, and so on.
The original Atkins is a very healthy diet *if* it suits the individual. 
I personally think things began to go badly awry with Atkins as an 
eating plan, when they got into all the fake carb replacements for 
breads, cakes, pastas,  and sweets of all kinds. I prefer to stick to 
real foods as much as humanly possible.

sol


grace1...@aol.com wrote:

Sometimes people get the wrong idea about the Atkins diet, that it 
consists of only meat, cheese, fat, and so forth.  That would 
definitely not be healthy, although I know some people who do well on 
that, and some who don't.  Atkins himself said that after the initial 
breaking in period with his diet, that he recommends fruits and 
vegetables (complex carbohydrates), and that people have gotten the 
wrong idea about his diet.  That would leave out only sugar and 
refined carbohydrates, and there is much evidence to suggest that 
these are the culprits in weight gain, as well as many degenerative 
diseases.  The complex carbohydrates are healthy, and the more raw, 
organic food we eat, the better. One may choose to focus on those 
complex carbohydrates which have a lower glycemic index, however. 
 
Some people are unaware that the Atkins diet was not originally 
designed for the purpose of loosing weight. Atkins was experimenting 
with a diet that would treat serious illness, such as heart disease, 
cancer, diabetes, etc., that was recalcitrant to other treatments.  
His famous diet worked outstandingly for these patients to return them 
to health.  The weight loss effect was noted later, as a side 
effect!   Nowadays, people often think that is its only purpose, 
and that benefits of loosing weight must be weighed against (sorry for 
the pun) the disadvantage of following this unhealthy diet.
 
Jill




 




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
  


Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread Barbara
I did read all of this and also that the more free medicine in Europe is in 
agreement with Atkins.  They did test studies and confirmed the benefits of his 
diet on so many degenerative diseases that have no cure here in States.   

Barbara




  Some people are unaware that the Atkins diet was not originally designed for 
the purpose of loosing weight. Atkins was experimenting with a diet that would 
treat serious illness, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, etc., that was 
recalcitrant to other treatments.  His famous diet worked outstandingly for 
these patients to return them to health.  The weight loss effect was noted 
later, as a side effect!   Nowadays, people often think that is its only 
purpose, and that benefits of loosing weight must be weighed against (sorry for 
the pun) the disadvantage of following this unhealthy diet.

  Jill

Re: CScholesterol and triglycerides, was Re: CSNiacin

2005-12-30 Thread twll56
This site is very anti carbohydrate.Even fiber therapy bad.
http://www.biblelife.org/carbs.htm



CSCholesterol and Vitamin C

2005-03-11 Thread Simon
For all those interested there is some great info at www.vitamincfoundation.org 
then download the free video on Vitamin C 

CScholesterol, and Lecithin - study from Morrison 1958

2005-03-10 Thread Connie Howard
Below is a web site that I found interesting regard Lecithin  I just
began get Lecithin (granules) from the health food store and putting them
in applesauce...  two to three times a day.  Approximately 1 large
tbls... do not put in anything hot or warm.  I believe I've notice
something happening... to early to tell as I just started 2 days ago.   
Anyone else using this?

connie
http://www.diet-and-health.net/Supplements/PhosphatidylCholine.html 

Re: CScholesterol, and Lecithin - study from Morrison 1958

2005-03-10 Thread Brickeyk
The DR thought my wife had a blocked artery on the side of her neck and her 
magnesium was so low he said she could die. I bought one pound of lecithin had 
her take a tablespoon of lecithin and 250 mg of magnesium oxide. 
DR had her admitted to the Hospital. Her magnesium level was normal and 
passed a Doppler checking for blockage. He tried all sorts of tests, all 
negative.
My father took 3 tablespoons of lecithin a day for a blocked neck artery back 
in the 70's. Two years after seeing his DR who said to operate, his DR said 
the blockage was gone.
My Omron nebulizer quit so back trying Walgrens humidifier. Just finished 
spraying herbicides and Asthma tends to get worse after spraying. The CS + DMSO 
seems to help. This time the humidifier seemed to work as good as the more 
expensive nebulizer. I also have the red LEDs over my chest area. I made sure 
my 
hot tub pH was alkaline and try to get one hour of ultra violet from the sun 
each noon. I read that an alkaline bath enhances the suns ultra violet. Pollen 
from several trees is near springtime levels. I have several steroid inhalers 
that seemed to not work.
Brickey


CSRe[2]: CScholesterol, and Lecithin - study from Morrison 1958

2005-03-10 Thread V
Hi Brickeyk,

Try grape seed extract it is a natural anti histamine.
I used some and it worked real good for me. worked on the first dose. I took 
about 3 or 4 caps. it seems to hold for a long time so I only took it every few 
days.
http://www.drmyattswellnessclub.com/grapeseed.htm



Take care,
 V


 The DR thought my wife had a blocked artery on the side of her neck and her
 magnesium was so low he said she could die. I bought one pound of lecithin had
 her take a tablespoon of lecithin and 250 mg of magnesium oxide. 
 DR had her admitted to the Hospital. Her magnesium level was normal and 
 passed a Doppler checking for blockage. He tried all sorts of tests, all 
 negative.
 My father took 3 tablespoons of lecithin a day for a blocked neck artery back
 in the 70's. Two years after seeing his DR who said to operate, his DR said
 the blockage was gone.
 My Omron nebulizer quit so back trying Walgrens humidifier. Just finished
 spraying herbicides and Asthma tends to get worse after spraying. The CS + 
 DMSO
 seems to help. This time the humidifier seemed to work as good as the more
 expensive nebulizer. I also have the red LEDs over my chest area. I made sure 
 my
 hot tub pH was alkaline and try to get one hour of ultra violet from the sun
 each noon. I read that an alkaline bath enhances the suns ultra violet. Pollen
 from several trees is near springtime levels. I have several steroid inhalers
 that seemed to not work.
 Brickey


--


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CScholesterol

2004-07-17 Thread mamapug

Well, it isn`t just glucose, didn`t you see one of the end products is
cholesterol??
As to natural, it is highly refined, and that, IMHO, ain`t natural!!
Marshalee

 I don't follow..
  If the end result is all glucose, what difference does it make what the
 source is?
 Sucrose, white sugar, is a natural sugar from cane and beets.  Nothing
 unnatural about it, though it does lack the accompanying minerals and
 vitamins and such that molasses has.

 ..nuthin wrong wit mo lasses.. I take aw de lasses Ah kin gits mah hay-nds
on.
  Come on ova'h hey-re sugah beet!

  I be dying of a hart attak wit a tootless smile on mah face!
 ;-)

 Ode

 At 11:43 PM 7/14/04, you wrote:
 Dear Terry,
 I read somewhere that sucrose, (table sugar, which is definitely not a
 natural food, for sure,) is the cause of high cholesterol, not eggs or
meat.
 When sucrose is digested, it breaks down to glucose and fructose. The
 fructose is then broken down to more glucose and, taaa daa,
Cholesterol!!!
 Makes sense, that sugar is what is killing us.
 I`m addicted to the stuff...
 Marshalee
 
 
 --
 The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
 
 Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
 
 To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
 Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
 
 Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
 OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
 
 List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com
 
 




Re: CScholesterol

2004-07-16 Thread Ode Coyote
I don't follow..
 If the end result is all glucose, what difference does it make what the
source is?
Sucrose, white sugar, is a natural sugar from cane and beets.  Nothing
unnatural about it, though it does lack the accompanying minerals and
vitamins and such that molasses has.

..nuthin wrong wit mo lasses.. I take aw de lasses Ah kin gits mah hay-nds on.
 Come on ova'h hey-re sugah beet! 

 I be dying of a hart attak wit a tootless smile on mah face!
;-)

Ode

At 11:43 PM 7/14/04, you wrote:
Dear Terry,
I read somewhere that sucrose, (table sugar, which is definitely not a
natural food, for sure,) is the cause of high cholesterol, not eggs or meat.
When sucrose is digested, it breaks down to glucose and fructose. The
fructose is then broken down to more glucose and, taaa daa, Cholesterol!!!
Makes sense, that sugar is what is killing us.
I`m addicted to the stuff...
Marshalee


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com




Re: CScholesterol

2004-07-16 Thread Garnet
The difference is the cost to the body of breaking the various forms of
sugar down to glucose, which all carbohydrates ultimately are,
regardless of how complex or simple. As I mentioned in an eralier
message to the list today, on sugars, when the normal pathway for
sucrose is overwhelmed then the alternative pathway kicks in. This alt
pathway has more toxic by products.

As an aside . . . Glucose can also be made from protien, but the body
does not utilize this pathway unless it has to. Gluconeogensis is the
name of the process.

The end result may be the same but the road you take to get there does
indeed influence the experience. Choose your path well applies to
biochemistry as well as life's more spiritual aspects.

Garnet

On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 06:40, Ode Coyote wrote:
 I don't follow..
  If the end result is all glucose, what difference does it make what the
 source is?



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CScholesterol

2004-07-15 Thread David Bearrow
Over ten years ago, the two-time Nobel prize Laureate, Dr Linus Pauling and 
his associate Dr Matthias Rath, advocated and published a definitive thesis 
on the root cause, treatment, and actual cure for all forms of 
cardiovascular disease (CVD), including congestive heart failure, heart 
disease, and stroke. Today, cardiovascular related health problems together 
comprise fully one half of all causes of death in the US. Pauling and 
Rath's brilliant analysis of CVD is absolutely compelling and amply 
supported by numerous epidemiological and clinical studies. His unified 
theory of CVD constitutes one of the greatest breakthroughs in modern 
science, and yet has been almost completely ignored by the mainstream 
medical establishment, and received almost no press.

http://www.paulingtherapy.com/

David Bearrow

At 11:43 PM 7/14/04, you wrote:

Dear Terry,
I read somewhere that sucrose, (table sugar, which is definitely not a
natural food, for sure,) is the cause of high cholesterol, not eggs or meat.
When sucrose is digested, it breaks down to glucose and fructose. The
fructose is then broken down to more glucose and, taaa daa, Cholesterol!!!
Makes sense, that sugar is what is killing us.
I`m addicted to the stuff...
Marshalee



--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour mdev...@eskimo.com


Re: CScholesterol

2004-07-15 Thread GoToHoll
 
 
In a message dated 07/15/2004 6:57:27 AM Central Daylight Time,  
dav...@sbcglobal.net writes:

Over ten  years ago, the two-time Nobel prize Laureate, Dr Linus Pauling and 
his  associate Dr Matthias Rath, advocated and published a definitive thesis 
on  the root cause, treatment, and actual cure for all forms of 
cardiovascular  disease (CVD), including congestive heart failure, heart  



David B, thanks for posting this, new hope for my husband's  CVD...
Laura H., TX