RE: [RCSE] Maple Leaf Design - New Site

2008-08-24 Thread chris
Craig,

Adam Weston flew one at Poway, and placed in the top 10, and then flew
one in the German Open and placed fairly well also.

Heck, he beat you at Poway!

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Maple Leaf Design - New Site
 From: Craig Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, August 22, 2008 9:23 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com soaring@airage.com
 Just curios ... Does anyone know anyone who has bought an Encore in the last 
 couple of years   And an Icon 2 at $2,200.. I'm rolling on the floor 
 :-))
 --- On Fri, 8/22/08, Joe Nave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From: Joe Nave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [RCSE] Maple Leaf Design - New Site
 To: soaring@airage.com
 Date: Friday, August 22, 2008, 7:35 PM
 Greetings...
 Maple Leaf Design, the makers of the Encore DLG and the Icon2 have a new
 site up.
 Check it out: www.mapleleafdesign.com
 Joe
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
 subscribe and unsubscribe requests to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages
 must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web
 based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Removing old covering, more info

2008-08-18 Thread chris
Craig,

If it is dope based, then acetone will work fine.  However, any color in
the dope will probably remain in the wood or seep into the wood.  I
might try nail polish remover, as it has some MEK, which like acetone,
works but is less volatile and may contain some nitromethane.  You might
try methylene chloride or chloroform.  I do not thin isopropyl alcohol
will work, but perhaps some mineral spirits.  Do remember that if there
is any foam, then all this stuff is useless.  I have a Friend who works
alot with nitrate dope and tissue who I will try to contact for more
info.  He is a free flighter from 40 years ago!

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Removing old covering, more info
 From: Craig Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, August 18, 2008 7:49 am
 To: soaring@airage.com soaring@airage.com
 It's hard to tell what type of covering it is... It's over 40 years old so it 
 can't be any type of iron on,  Its not silk, but does apear to be
 dope based
 Craig

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Gordy's Sand Dollars

2008-08-16 Thread chris
Gordy,

What is the cut you get for all the diamond rings, jewelry, watches,
and money you find when your machines filter the sand

I saw them do a blurb last night on them for the Men's Beach Volleyball
event.

Are the machines Made in China and do the Radio Controls use 2.4
GHz

Inquiring minds want to know!

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Gordy's Sand Dollars
 From: Paul  Rickie Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sat, August 16, 2008 7:36 am
 To: Soaring@airage.com
 Gordy!!  For heavens sake WHAT has making dollars with radio control
 beach cleaners have to do with Radio Control Soaring--have you lost your
 creativity !!??  What a bummer!
 This post!?  I am announcing I am going to be slope soaring my tired/
 Blushing /Taboo up the west coast of Japan as well as a L.A. /Scrappy
 /(mini zagi like wing made from scraps--now that is creativity, Gordy)
 that my son Jonathan built and gave me for a Father's Day past!  So
 there, Gordy.  From the Isles BEYOND Hawaii, Gordy!!  (Gordy doesn't
 know Japan from Hawaii any more than he knows the difference between
 beer and barley pops!  Skypilot

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Several DLG questions

2008-08-15 Thread chris
Dan,

Many of your questions have answers and much more info on RCgroups.com
on the Handlaunch forums.  See:http://www.rcgroups.com/hand-launch-96/

As for the other questions, most are using composite winged planes
because of their stiffness, airfoil accuracy, and ease of building. 
There are many built up plane kits out there, of which the DL50 is nice.
 there are build logs for it as well as others Whig you might find
helpful.

As for the separate rudder and elevator, sub-rudders assist with
reducing boom bending, hence building a rudder and not having to split
it for an elevator is nice.  As for elevators, again, you have a much
lighter and stronger structure.  However, one of the best real reasons
is transporting the plane.  You can remove the elevator and the fuse
then lies flat in a box, or whatever.  The tailfeathers are quite light
and delicate, so this prevent hanger rash!  As for aerodynamics, you
still have the intersections of the surfaces, so drag is not really that
much different.  In some cases you can uses an all moving stab, and that
helps with obtaining the best incidence for launching and thermaling.

There are other reasons, so again, I invite you to look at RCgroups, and
you can pour through all the old posts and questions.  There are lots of
pictures, so that helps alot too.

Chris





  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Several DLG questions
 From: Dan Ashenfelter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, August 12, 2008 5:00 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com
 Gentlemen:
 Before flying season fades into the sunset, I would like to build a DLG.  At 
 this point in my life I have more time than money, so I am looking at a 
 built-up entry level kit rather than spending $300+ for an ARF or a 
 high-performance kit.
 I have been researching quite a bit over the last several days, and the 
 conventional built-up kit selection is rather sparse. Right now, the most 
 likely candidates are the QF2 from Mountain Models and the Gambler AF from 
 Wright Brothers RC.  I have also considered the relatively low cost ARF 
 Apache from SoaringUSA.com
 As I researched built-up DLG's it seemed that most of them were 50 span or 
 less rather than the usual 1.5m span that dominates the higher end models. Is 
 this for structural integrity or mostly for personal convenience/choice? As a 
 novice DLG flyer should I look toward shorter span models or stick with the 
 1.5m ships?
 I am also curious to understand why the vertical and horizontal tail surfaces 
 are separated on most DLG's. Aerodynamically I know that fewer intersections 
 helps with drag, but are there other reasons for doing so?
 I have been flying r/c for 36+ years so I am not a novice to model flight but 
 DLG is a whole new world for me.
 If anyone on the exchange has experience with the models named above (or 
 similar kits) or can offer a novice DLG pilot some practical advise on span 
 choice, Rudder/Elevator vs Rudder/Aileron/Elevator, polyhedral vs dihedral 
 models or any other area that might prove helpful, I would be very grateful.
 Thanks
 Dan Ashenfelter
 Fort Dodge, Iowa

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Re: testing Missing posts???

2008-08-04 Thread chris
I am unsure if this is response to an old post, but if it is not and old
post, then:


Darwin, good proposal for thought!

After reading Darwin’s comment, I have to agree with his suggestion to
combine the modern RES class with Open.  Back when Visalia first
proposed an RES class, before the AVA and its equivalents, RES was
touted by many to be the builder class as well as the partially the
woody-nostalgia class.  Those of us that were not as quick with our
thumbs, or relished a somewhat less stressful class, welcomed it.  The
class is like other classes in the AMA schedule, it represents a way for
upcoming pilots to have fun, as well as permit older or less competitive
pilots to still participate.  But as in nearly all types of RC soaring,
technology breeds advancement, design, and this necessitates advanced
composites, and we get to the point where to be competitive, at least in
some fashion, you have to have deep pockets.  Obviously, there are those
of us who still build, only with CF now rather than wood, but the
majority of competitors nowadays just buy the best they can afford. 
Really, to be competitive, just buy a known ship and fly.

However, Darwin, how about bringing back a strict “builder of the
model” rule event?  What was a “true modeler” anyway?  This opens
it all up to variety, yet might retain the idea and some excitement. 
None of this glue servos in, trim and fly stuff, but perhaps require the
builder to bring the mold to show.  Wood, well, wood is wood, but still
not prebuilt wood like an AVA.  Those who obviously build composites
from mold would probably want to be in the Open class anyway, but those
who want to build, experiment and enjoy might find an event not
something that really is being placed on the back burner of a contest. 
We encourage differences between juniors, seniors and open in the AMA,
but is there really a difference there either?  Buy a hot ship and place
it in the hands of a upcoming junior and he or she becomes a major
contender.  We do not have separate events, that lead up to the top,
like dirt cars, sprint cars, Bush series, then NASCAR, probably because
of numbers.  On the other hand, we do have a “grey cup” for those of
us not as quick with our thumbs, or sight.  What is really the intent
here, an old RES equivalent?
I might also like to ask why so many classes?  Is it for money making
purposes of the clubs, or is it to increase the pilot’s flying
opportunities if they travel?  Recent posts here and in other groups
mention that some contests will not become prominent until they are of
sufficient day duration and flying opportunities to make them
attractive.  For myself, I find that DLG/HLG offer me the opportunity to
fly much more than any of the other TD events.  These contests off more
of other items as well.  


OK, for all those who expect this, or disagree, or even think I am
complaining,  back to my regular Thorazine treatments. ;-)

Chris Adams




From Darwin:
Come on guys, lay off 2 Meter. I'll bet most have not even given it a 
serious try. If you did, I believe you'd like the challenge. It will 
improve all aspects of your flying.
 
I remember years ago when RES was envisioned. It was supposed to be a 
simple class with simple airplanes for those not interested in 
spending big $$$ on Open class planes. Well look what happened. It 
actually became a 3 channel Open class, called RES. For the most part, 
you have to have the high dollar RES moldie to be competitive. As a 
result, we had to add another Class, Woody. This is a true modelers 
Class.
 
You want a solution, dump RES and combine it with Open. After all, 
they are 3 channel Open class planes, launch as high and can range out 
quite far. The only real difference is landing. I see the better RES 
guys whooping the Open class guys anyway, so lump them all together.
 
Just some thoughts. Now, my second cup of coffee!!!
 
Darwin N. Barrie
Chandler AZ


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: testing
 From: Darwin Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sun, July 27, 2008 11:17 am
 To: Jeff Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Soaring@airage.com
 The tests are going through but my post regarding 2 Meter must be  
 being blocked for some reason. The post is nothing in the scheme of  
 things. I'm getting pissed.
 Darwin N. Barrie
 Chandler AZOn Jul 27, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Jeff Reid wrote:
  Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:24:01 -0700
  From: Darwin Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Soaring@airage.com
  Subject: Testing
  Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  I've attempted 2 posts over the past couple of days and they  
  haven't  posted. What's up?
 
  I've had the same issue. I've posted a few times and nwever see the
  posts show up. I'm receiving the archived version if this makes any
  difference.
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send  
  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to soaring- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe  
  messages must be sent

RE: [RCSE] German Open F3K Finals

2008-08-04 Thread chris
Steve,

I asked a AMA official about the status of F3K as a WC event supported
by the AMA.

I was told that it would not be supported unless one of the F3B or F3J
was dropped.

I guess soaring is getting popular.

F3K all over s growing very rapidly.

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] German Open F3K Finals
 From: S Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sun, August 03, 2008 5:45 pm
 To: Ben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: soaring@airage.com soaring@airage.com
 Ben Wilson wrote:
  ...
 
  That's out of 112 participants. Someone (who shall remain nameless) at
  the US F3K NATS said to me they have 112 people at a *handlaunch*
  contest?  Yes, (name), handlaunch is popular everywhere else in the
  world except the US Nationals.
 
  There's a good reason why 8 (almost 10) of our top pilots went to
  Germany instead of the NATS - though it might have been the draught
  beer on tap on the field! (When can we get that at Muncie?)
 I witnessed quite a few beers, though nothing on tap.  You have to bring
 your own.  BYOB.
  Bubba, the number 1 beer connoisseur, was seen clutching a vintage pint
 most evenings.
 There were also mojitos, wine, cheese, guacamole, hamburgers, brats,
 steaks, pork tenderloin, bean casserole, and  much more.  You just need
 to stay more than one day and hang out with the right people.  :-)
  Voice your opinions to your LSF officials that you would like a 2 day
 HL contest and that you will attend.   We don't want HL to go the way of
 Scale, Scale CC, and soon F3B.
 Steve Meyer
 LSF IV
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] RES vs UNL vs DLG

2008-08-04 Thread chris
Ah Yes, and...

If God wanted us to build fiberglass (and Carbon and Kevlar) wings, he
would have given us Fiberglass trees!

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] RES vs UNL vs DLG
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, August 04, 2008 3:25 pm
 To: Bill's Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: RCSE soaring@airage.com
 Friends don't let friends build with balsa!!!  :^)
 Mark Mech
 www.aerofoam.com
 - Original Message - 
 From: Bill's Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: RCSE soaring@airage.com
 Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 3:18 PM
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] RES vs UNL vs DLG
 I think it is abundantly clear the path that is needed to be taken in 
 soaring to restore it to all its glory.  Yes, I am talking about the 
 complete prohibition of all but one aircraft from soaring competition.
 
  The one and only aircraft that shall be used is the venerable Skeeter, and 
  it MUST be built by the pilot. This will restore the need for building 
  skills and also positively determine who the best pilot is. Anyone who can 
  keep a Skeeter aloft from more than a few minutes truly is a a soaring 
  God!!
 
  So there it is, the salvation of soaring is the Skeeter. Who'd a thunk 
  it??
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe 
  and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note 
  that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format 
  with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
  AOL are generally NOT in text format
  
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Apology to Ben

2008-07-30 Thread chris
Ben,

I have to apologize for my rapid and quite offensive response to your
post.

I believe, as you do, that F3K/DLG is one of the most rapidly expanding
forms of RC soaring, much like what park flyers and EPP did for the RC
arena.  The recognition of F3K and DLG is increasing as larger TD sites
become unavailable in some localities.

I was taken back about comments about the German Open because there were
other US pilots there, not just the quoted names of the top US pilots.
It seems that the others get relegated to background noise.  Reporting
for the German Open is extensively done on the Handlaunch glider forum
of RCgroups, and I as well as others have  posted pictures and comments.

Peoples say Go US Team not know that there were three (3) US teams
since the team signups were open to anybody.  USA Team 2 had Bruce
Davidson, Mike Seid, and Adam Weston grouped together, while USA Team 3
contained the remainder of us, Jeff Carr, Bret Carr, and myself. 
Obviously our groupings were decided by us to put forth the best team
USA team 1 3rd), but indeed Team 2 (8th) faired very well, and Team 3
was not last (LOL 25th).

My goals are much like yours, to disseminate plane design information,
and I am trying to do this on RCgroups with my posts and views.

I hope we can propagate the sport of F3K /DLG because I know it will
become big, very fast.

Once again, I apologize for my response and taking the issue the wrong
way.

Thermals,

Chris Adams


  Original Message 
 Subject: RE: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, July 29, 2008 9:00 pm
 To: Ben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: soaring@airage.com, LASS Soaring List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Ben,
 I have never been so insulted as what you have posted here.  Perhaps
 Jeff and Bret are just as insulted.
 I have been flying HLG longer than you are probably old, old enough for
 me to be your father and grandfather!
 Just so you know, there were three other US pilots at the German Open,
 yet you never acknowledge US!!
 I have flown HLG long before anybody ever thought about HLG contests.  I
 flew in Dave Thornburg's HLG contest, and even designed a 66 HLG for it
 which parallels what we fly today.
 I fly HLG/DLG because it gives me the enjoyment and independence of not
 having to wait for winch lines or frequency control.
 Jeff Carr, Bret Carr and I supported our US group and flew.  We may not
 be the creme of the crop that Oleg, Bruce, Paul or Phil may  be, but we
 participate for each of our own reasons.  You make it sound like we are
 invisible to the rest of the group.  I think you are somewhat lost.
 I design and build DLGs because I enjoy the opportunity that they offer
 me.  Of the US group, besides Oleg who flew his 5 year old Taboo
 designs, I was the only US guy there flying My Own design!!!
 DLG pilots fly DLG for one basic reason, it allows each of us to fly
 independently and to not depend on waiting for winches or any other
 complaints from others.  I can go out and fly in the AM, Noon hour, or
 PM, and enjoy my time hunting the elusive thermal.  Contests are not the
 only thing that matters in this world when it comes to flying.  Some of
 us design, others fly, but in the end we fly fly fly!.
 In my opinion, the AMA does not know what DLG is doing for the world of
 soaring.  TD contests will be going by the wayside.  Bruce Davidson put
 it quite plainly at the German Open to me, why should he travel 10
 hours, fly three or 4 flights then drive back from a TD contest, when
 he can fly DLG, many rounds and many flights and have the enjoyment of
 not having to just do spot landings.
 I will go to more DLG contests than TD contests this year and I am
 perhaps giving up TD contest entirely.  I can do the social event at
 HLG/DLG contests and still get the technical and design satisfaction of
 DLG flying. After all What is  DLG but a subclass of TD.  Perhaps we
 should be saying that TD is really a subclass of HLG/DLG because we used
 to thermal out TD ships from Hand launches when we test glided TD ships!
 Personally I see DLG support  by the AMA replacing F3B and even perhaps
 F3J, as a world class group.
 So I think you owe Jeff, Bret and Me an apology for not recognizing us
 as participants at the German Open at the same level as Oleg, Bruce,
 Paul, Phil and the rest.
 Don't forget, Bret did make the Junior flyoffs and did place in that
 realm!
 Please come back when you realize there are others who fly also.
 Thermals,
 Chris Adams
 LSF 348 Lvl V (#8)
   Original Message 
  Subject: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.
  From: Ben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Tue, July 29, 2008 7:15 pm
  To: soaring@airage.com, LASS Soaring List
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  So y'all have probably heard my whining about the lack of 2 days of
  handlaunch at the NATS, so let me pitch you my argument for it and for
  better attention paid to handlaunch by soaring in general. This is the
  product of a number

RE: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.

2008-07-30 Thread chris
Oh Yes, please send me an applications.

LOL
Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: RE: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.
 From: TG Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, July 30, 2008 8:05 am
 To: Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED], soaring@airage.com
 Bravo Mark,
  
 Now on to something that I SHOULD be upset about.
 I just got an email from AARPHOLY CRAP...isnt that the sign of the coming 
 apocalypse?
 Oh man, it's just prostrate exams and midnight trips to the bathroom from 
 here on out.
  
 So whose going to Visalia this year?
  
 Tom 
  Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:31:53 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 
  Re: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch. To: soaring@airage.com
  Ben,  I have never been so insulted as what you have posted here. 
  Perhaps Jeff and Bret are just as insulted.  I went to the NATS last 
  year. Came in 33rd. in Unlimited. No one mentioned my name as attending. 
  Should I be insulted? I'm not, as I do not need the pat on the back from my 
  fellow man to be happy. I am plenty happy in my own mind with 33rd. Usually 
  I am down about 100 more places.  Bravo to everyone who took the time, 
  effort and expense to attend in the German F3K event.  Mark
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and 
  unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and 
  unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. 
  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT 
  in text format
 _
 Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
 http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_family_safety_072008

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.

2008-07-29 Thread chris
Ben,

I have never been so insulted as what you have posted here.  Perhaps
Jeff and Bret are just as insulted.

I have been flying HLG longer than you are probably old, old enough for
me to be your father and grandfather!

Just so you know, there were three other US pilots at the German Open,
yet you never acknowledge US!!

I have flown HLG long before anybody ever thought about HLG contests.  I
flew in Dave Thornburg's HLG contest, and even designed a 66 HLG for it
which parallels what we fly today.

I fly HLG/DLG because it gives me the enjoyment and independence of not
having to wait for winch lines or frequency control.

Jeff Carr, Bret Carr and I supported our US group and flew.  We may not
be the creme of the crop that Oleg, Bruce, Paul or Phil may  be, but we
participate for each of our own reasons.  You make it sound like we are
invisible to the rest of the group.  I think you are somewhat lost.

I design and build DLGs because I enjoy the opportunity that they offer
me.  Of the US group, besides Oleg who flew his 5 year old Taboo
designs, I was the only US guy there flying My Own design!!!

DLG pilots fly DLG for one basic reason, it allows each of us to fly
independently and to not depend on waiting for winches or any other
complaints from others.  I can go out and fly in the AM, Noon hour, or
PM, and enjoy my time hunting the elusive thermal.  Contests are not the
only thing that matters in this world when it comes to flying.  Some of
us design, others fly, but in the end we fly fly fly!.

In my opinion, the AMA does not know what DLG is doing for the world of
soaring.  TD contests will be going by the wayside.  Bruce Davidson put
it quite plainly at the German Open to me, why should he travel 10
hours, fly three or 4 flights then drive back from a TD contest, when
he can fly DLG, many rounds and many flights and have the enjoyment of
not having to just do spot landings.

I will go to more DLG contests than TD contests this year and I am
perhaps giving up TD contest entirely.  I can do the social event at
HLG/DLG contests and still get the technical and design satisfaction of
DLG flying. After all What is  DLG but a subclass of TD.  Perhaps we
should be saying that TD is really a subclass of HLG/DLG because we used
to thermal out TD ships from Hand launches when we test glided TD ships!

Personally I see DLG support  by the AMA replacing F3B and even perhaps
F3J, as a world class group.

So I think you owe Jeff, Bret and Me an apology for not recognizing us
as participants at the German Open at the same level as Oleg, Bruce,
Paul, Phil and the rest.

Don't forget, Bret did make the Junior flyoffs and did place in that
realm!

Please come back when you realize there are others who fly also.

Thermals,

Chris Adams
LSF 348 Lvl V (#8)



  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.
 From: Ben Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, July 29, 2008 7:15 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com, LASS Soaring List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 So y'all have probably heard my whining about the lack of 2 days of
 handlaunch at the NATS, so let me pitch you my argument for it and for
 better attention paid to handlaunch by soaring in general. This is the
 product of a number of discussions I've had with a number of people
 involved with soaring at different levels over the past couple of years,
 so here goes:
 AN INTRODUCTION
 I've been in soaring since 2003, and have been to the NATS the last 4
 years in some capacity or another. My first love is handlaunch, but I'm
 also a big fan of RES and Unlimited stuff. I also got the
 international-style bug last year towing for an F3J team at the NATS.
 Second, let me state that I have helped Denny Maize over the last 3
 years organize his Polecat Challenge. In those years, it's gone from a
 pretty well attended contest (40 pilots) to last year, which had 93
 registered and paid pilots.  Around 80 or so flew. (Yes, we managed to
 top the IHLGF this year, but that might just be a statistical wobble,
 or it could be the Red Bull girls, pig roast or huge soaring raffle).
 As I was intimately involved with the registration of the pilots and the
 gathering and reporting of information about that contest as well as the
 NATS last year, I've got a somewhat unique perspective into handlaunch
 and soaring.  I stress handlaunch and soaring there, because the
 crossover between HL and TD is pretty well delineated. There are a lot
 of people doing HL and more doing TD, but there is only modest
 intersection between the two.
 SOME NUMBERS
 At the Polecat Challenge, out of the 80-some pilots:
 13 of them were Novices, meaning that they hadn't flown a contest before.
 29 of them were Sportsmen.
 The rest were experts.
 The average age for handlaunch competitors skews much younger than
 soaring in general (this is empirical)
 Last year at the NATS when I did the coverage for the NATSNews, I had to
 hunt and peck for guys who were new to soaring or the NATS

[RCSE] RE: I say we find Ben and Crach his throwing peg!!!!

2008-07-29 Thread chris
Good try Gordy, I know that is something your would do! ;-)

I don't care that he took time to post, we all post and some of use do
posts on RCgroups. 

There were 9 of us there, Oleg, Phil Paul, Adam, Jeff, Bret, Mike, Bret,
and myself, Yet the only ones recognized were what appears to be the
top.  In 25 years, Oleg, Phil, Paul, Mike will be the the old group who
no one recognizes or care about.  But if they show up will anybody
recognize them???

It is funny to see someone who was not there, who did not see the
planes, nor other competitors, report Postumously.

I have plenty of photos, and started my report.  Phil, Bruce, and others
saw the contests one way, the rest of us saw it another.

I will post in good time, but not here, rather on RC groups.

Ben may be working on LSF V, but Been there Done that, and I perhaps
even force Steve and John to get theirs!!

Chris





  Original Message 
 Subject: I say we find Ben and Crach his throwing peg
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, July 29, 2008 9:07 pm
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: soaring@airage.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Got you Chris!  I told him to leave you off knowing it would piss you  off :-)
 In any case it wasn't who was left out of his post...its that he took the  
 time to post something at all!
 You'll note no one else did.
 Nice report Ben.
 For those of you who don't know Ben, he is one of Louisville's top  thermal 
 pilots. He's been an official Nats reporter and one of our Little Lee's  
 soaring mentors...(yeah the little guy who won the MidSouth Soaring 
 Champs...and  
 ugh is headed toward taking over DLG in the near future...and shortly  
 LSF4!
  
 Ben is working on his LSF 5 tasks with meand someone I count as a best  
 buddy in the hobby.
  
 Gordy
 Asheville NC tonite..you?
  
  
 In a message dated 7/29/2008 11:01:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Ben,
 I have never been so insulted as what you have posted  here.  Perhaps
 Jeff and Bret are just as insulted.
 I have been  flying HLG longer than you are probably old, old enough for
 me to be your  father and grandfather!
 Just so you know, there were three other US  pilots at the German Open,
 yet you never acknowledge US!!
 I  have flown HLG long before anybody ever thought about HLG contests.   I
 flew in Dave Thornburg's HLG contest, and even designed a 66 HLG for  it
 which parallels what we fly today.
 I fly HLG/DLG because it gives  me the enjoyment and independence of not
 having to wait for winch lines or  frequency control.
 Jeff Carr, Bret Carr and I supported our US group  and flew.  We may not
 be the creme of the crop that Oleg, Bruce, Paul  or Phil may  be, but we
 participate for each of our own reasons.   You make it sound like we are
 invisible to the rest of the group.  I  think you are somewhat lost.
 I design and build DLGs because I enjoy  the opportunity that they offer
 me.  Of the US group, besides Oleg who  flew his 5 year old Taboo
 designs, I was the only US guy there flying My  Own design!!!
 DLG pilots fly DLG for one basic reason, it allows each  of us to fly
 independently and to not depend on waiting for winches or any  other
 complaints from others.  I can go out and fly in the AM, Noon  hour, or
 PM, and enjoy my time hunting the elusive thermal.  Contests  are not the
 only thing that matters in this world when it comes to  flying.  Some of
 us design, others fly, but in the end we fly fly  fly!.
 In my opinion, the AMA does not know what DLG is doing for the  world of
 soaring.  TD contests will be going by the wayside.   Bruce Davidson put
 it quite plainly at the German Open to me, why should  he travel 10
 hours, fly three or 4 flights then drive back from a TD  contest, when
 he can fly DLG, many rounds and many flights and have the  enjoyment of
 not having to just do spot landings.
 I will go to more  DLG contests than TD contests this year and I am
 perhaps giving up TD  contest entirely.  I can do the social event at
 HLG/DLG contests and  still get the technical and design satisfaction of
 DLG flying. After all  What is  DLG but a subclass of TD.  Perhaps we
 should be saying  that TD is really a subclass of HLG/DLG because we used
 to thermal out TD  ships from Hand launches when we test glided TD ships!
 Personally I see  DLG support  by the AMA replacing F3B and even perhaps
 F3J, as a world  class group.
 So I think you owe Jeff, Bret and Me an apology for not  recognizing us
 as participants at the German Open at the same level as  Oleg, Bruce,
 Paul, Phil and the rest.
 Don't forget, Bret did make  the Junior flyoffs and did place in that
 realm!
 Please come back  when you realize there are others who fly also.
 Thermals,
 Chris  Adams
 LSF 348 Lvl V (#8)
   Original Message  
  Subject: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.
  From: Ben  Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Tue, July 29, 2008 7:15  pm
  To: soaring@airage.com, LASS Soaring

[RCSE] Flying in Maryland

2008-07-25 Thread Chris Rose
I'm thinking of taking a job out in Princess Anne Maryland and was wondering
if there were any DLGers or just plane glider folk in that area?

Thanks,

Chris Rose


RE: [RCSE] Spare LSF5 Wins For Sale

2008-07-20 Thread chris
Hey,

I have an extra LSF5 goal and return from 1978 that might be usable.  I
do not know the condition.

Let me know.

Chris Adams 
LSF 348 Lvl V (#8)

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Spare LSF5 Wins For Sale
 From: Me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sat, July 19, 2008 12:48 pm
 To: RCSE soaring@airage.com
 
 
 Hi guys
 I just picked up a couple more spare LSF 5 wins
 Contact me off line if youd like to buy a few, I think ihave I have  
 at least 6 I can spare :-)
 Gordy
 A good had by all in Lansing
 today,ended before the rain.
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Contest idea....Time on tow penalty for TD?

2008-07-15 Thread chris

Craig,

What is with messing around with winch time  All minimizing winch
time does is make planes go up faster, and have them built like
composite bullets.  

Why not do something simple, like take the weight of the plane, mulitply
it by seconds and get a max time you have to fly??

We once talked about this , way back, when people used to fly scale, or
really stand off scale in the LSF tounaments and SSOAR NAT (that dates
me!)  Pilots often chose unique projects that could not compete with the
slicker ships.  A Schul Glider had a L/D of 15: or so.  If you took
the L/D and multiply it by say 10 seconds, that meant that your max time
had to be 150 seconds (2.5 minutes), which was reasonable for draggy,
early gliders.  If you had a Kestral, with an L/D of 36:1, that meant
360 seconds, or 6 minutes.  That was reasonable for a slick glider. 
That kept scale gliders of all vintages competitive.

So...let me ask this:

What happens if the launch is a discus launch of a 100 glider  NO
TOW TIME

Think about it.  If you know you can hand launch into a thermal, why
loose 4-5 seconds every time  Hello JW!!

Personally, any time you try to do this stuff, it always ends up with a
conclusion no one wants to fly!

Chris






  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Contest ideaTime on tow penalty for TD?
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, July 15, 2008 6:03 am
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], soaring@airage.com
 In a message dated 07/14/2008 8:21:54 PM Central Daylight Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 After watching the World F3J  I had an idea for a contest...
 Incorporate the time penalty on tow that they have in F3J but in a TD format.
 You would have a timer at each winch who would time your launch and write 
 that time down on your card...  For example if it were a 10 min task and you 
 towed for 6 sec the best time you could get would be a 9:54 even though you 
 flew a 
 perfect 10... Or even better... Double the time on tow penalty, so if it was 
 a 6 sec tow the best time you could get would be 9:48. Seems to me it would 
 throw more strategy and fun into a normal TD contest
 Suggestions ? Comments?
 Craig
 
  
 Having read the other replies, I think the solution would be to have a device 
 that timed the length of time the winch motor was on for the launch and 
 deduct that from the score. That would allow a woody to tap up to the top and 
 take 
 their time doing so without incurring the time on tow penalty. The penalty 
 would then be for time using power on tow.
  
 Bill Wingstedt
  
 **Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
 scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!  
 (http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus0005000112)
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Johnny Berlin's 8 hour task

2008-07-14 Thread chris
Congratulations!!  So when are you starting to do it
again???

Thermals,

Chris Adams
LSF 348 LvL V (#8)

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Johnny Berlin's 8 hour task
 From: Dennis Hoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sun, July 13, 2008 4:12 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com soaring@airage.com
 I just got a call from Harry and Johnny Berlin successfully completed his 8
 hour Level V task today along the lake Michigan shoreline with perfect sloap
 conditions and has now completed all level V requirements.
 8 hrs, 1 minute, 20 seconds.
 Harry De Boer and Ted Grossner witnessed the flight.
 Congratulations Johnny!
 Dennis Hoyle
 WMSS
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Could CD's Please Collect Plane's Flown By Whom?....

2008-07-01 Thread chris
Gordy,

As a designer, I look at the overall list as more of a Manufacturer's
advertising list.  Think about it, each plane costs over $2500 to have
in flying condition, and each is like a Formula 1/Indy racer in it's own
regard.

For information on planes, I would be interested in 3 views (probably
already available), weights, airfoils, etc.  However, are any of the
planes Original Designs?  DP mentioned he was building a moldie a
while back, and I was looking forward to hearing of it's results.

Are the planes so close in performance that differences do not matter?

Years ago, F3B Worlds used to distribute data on ships, new approaches
to old problems etc.  I compiled a DVD back in 2001 of IHLGF data and it
was distributed.  I an going to the German Open and home to take alot of
pictures because how we address design issues for US conditions is alot
different from the design conditions in Europe.

I would love to see more regarding planes, setups, etc.

Chris








  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Could CD's Please Collect Plane's Flown By
 Whom?Thanks!  (F3J World Planes)
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, July 01, 2008 3:40 am
 To: Soaring@airage.com
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _http://www.f3x.no/f3j/2008/models08.htm_
 (http://www.f3x.no/f3j/2008/models08.htm)

 Here's the  kind of list that we have all dreamed would be posted  after
 every USA TD contest ever held in history! :-).

 Take a look guys, it will show you whats considered hot in F3J right
 now...or at least what was available :-).
 Gordy
 **Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for
 fuel-efficient used cars.  
 (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut000507)

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] July MA Mag..

2008-06-25 Thread chris

I hope Middle America can send some of that water over here to Northern
Calif to fight the fires, as Reno (downwind) is engulfed in the smoke
from them.  It makes it hard on the eyes, as well as needing to build in
the garage!  I know the pain the firefighters are having.

It is amazing the differences a mountain range makes!


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] July MA Mag..
 From: Darwin Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, June 25, 2008 2:37 pm
 To: Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Soaring@airage.com
 I feel for all of you guys in Middle America.
 Darwin
 On Jun 25, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
  Maybe if you did a column about gliders flying off of water it would  
  have made it. Since our sod farm is currently flooded we could have  
  been the subject club.
 
  Mark Miller
  MVSA
 
  - Original Message 
  From: Darwin Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Soaring@airage.com
  Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:03:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [RCSE] July MA Mag..
 
  Hi Brian,
 
  I don't know what happened. I'll have to call them. I have 2 into them
  now. Due to the Nationals the next one will be Sept. There should be
  one there now though.
 
  Darwin
  On Jun 25, 2008, at 9:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hey !! No soaring column?? Brian
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send



  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to soaring-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe
  messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.
  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
  generally NOT in text format
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send  
  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to soaring- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe  
  messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.   
  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are  
  generally NOT in text format
 
 
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] 9303 aileron to rudder coupling

2008-06-04 Thread chris
I am trying to set up my 9303 to turn off the aileron rudder coupling
via the right back Mix switch. I have been unable to locate the setup as
I had on my 8103.  Can some help with a pointer on how to do it?

Thanks
Chris


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] 9303 aileron to rudder coupling

2008-06-04 Thread chris
Mike, you are quite right, old habits.

I was trying to use the Aileron to Rudder standard mix rather than using
a separate programming mix.  I guess I have to set the pre-programmed
mix to 0 and go to the programmed mix.

I use on/off on my DLG so I can practice rudder with my left thumb.  I
prefer coupling, but I wanted to see a good roll with a new DLG just
built.  I set my rudder up exponentially, so that my rudder kicks in
fast before the aileron takes over.  I like more top-rudder ( believe
that is what that is).  I found recently I was cross-coupling the
aileron and rudder for flatter turns.  My old habits go back to just
rudder elevator on planes with more dihedral.

Thanks for the help.

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] 9303 aileron to rudder coupling
 From: Mike Lachowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, June 04, 2008 2:46 pm
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: soaring@airage.com soaring@airage.com

 Some old habits don't go away... Normally aileron to rudder coupling is
 set up by flight mode.   Flight modes make it possible to have more than
 two mixes.  In fact for aileron to rudder, you should set the mix to
 100% in launch mode in case you forget to use the correct stick.

 My suggestion if you want on/off mixing would be to use one of the
 programmable mixers.  Configure aileron to rudder.  Have the mix switch
 change you to position 1.  Set the aileron to rudder mix rates you want
 for position 0 and then leave the mixes for position 1 at 0.   In
 reality you probably don't want to go to 0, just a very low value.  So
 you could set position 1 to some small numbers like 6 or 7.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I am trying to set up my 9303 to turn off the aileron rudder coupling
  via the right back Mix switch. I have been unable to locate the setup as
  I had on my 8103.  Can some help with a pointer on how to do it?
 
  Thanks
  Chris
 
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
  unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
  unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. 
   Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT 
  in text format
 
 
 

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Gordy IN Poway, WOW, wonders do happen (?)

2008-05-30 Thread chris
Gordy,

WOW, Poway, isn't that out of your league??  No doubt, you will be
flying the World's Heaviest DLG, and I thought I was the only one to
be doing that!

Really, I do not see you listed on the Pilot's Roster???

Let's NOT see you fly Senior class!

I'll be there!


Chris




  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] JR Aero Tow, blown out today :-(
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, May 30, 2008 9:59 am
 To: Soaring@airage.com
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hi guys,
  
 I just happened to have had an appointment on Lake Michigan yesterday  
 morning, then one on a golf course construction site in Illinois not far from 
  
 Monticello yesterday afternoon :-)
  
 So here I am in my motel, just finish giving my new girl a full body rub  
 down, yes even some of the cavities got creamed but no worries, I picked some 
  
 extra terry towels!  
 Her name is Sharon and I can tell you that she is absolutely glowing bright  
 red after a very vigorous buffing!
 (I picked up some amazing polish at the local  AutoZone)
  
 I was going to head over to the field when TK gave me a call letting me  know 
 that the day was called due to the wild weather heading this way today.  
 Tomorrow is supposed to be perfect so I may stay over to play.
 
 Tonite it  will be steaks and beers and lots of stories for sure.
  
 Wish you were here!
 Gordy
 See you at Poway next weekend at the DLG International.
  
 PS. Anyone flying sailplanes in China, Malaysia, or Korea two or three  weeks?
 
 
 
 **Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch Cooking with 
 Tyler Florence on AOL Food.  
 (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4?NCID=aolfod000302)

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] 2.4

2008-05-29 Thread chris
Darwin,

While I am listed on Ch 17, I had Ron switch me to 2.4.  I will be
flying it in my old Encore variant, and my New Spider DLG.

My Original Fuselages are all Kevlar.

Chris Adams



  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] 2.4
 From: John Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, May 29, 2008 8:33 am
 To: Darwin Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED],  Soaring List Soaring@airage.com
 
 Darwin,
 
 I'm flying the Lightspeed and the Vandal on the FASST system.  I have my
 Taboo on a 72 mhz channel, hence my name on the roster that way.  My 2.4
 receivers have been flawless to date.  The Futaba is an easier install than
 the competitors; you don't have a satellite receiver with all it's
 associated wiring.  All you need to do is find a good resting spot for the
 ends of the antennae.  On both pods there are bands of carbon and Kevlar.  I
 glue a little soda straw on the Kevlar portion and that in turn receives the
 antennae end.  I also try to orient the other antennae at 90º of the first,
 in a balsa fairing on the Lightspeed and on the little deck under the canopy
 on the Vandal.
 
 Why aren't there more?  Because we're a cheap group!  We have receivers that
 work, so why jump across?  I see it as a gradual change.  10 years from now
 they will be universally used.
 
 JE
 --
 Erickson Architects
 John R. Erickson, AIA
 
 
  From: Darwin Barrie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 07:14:07 -0700
  To: Soaring@airage.com
  Subject: [RCSE] 2.4
  
  I thought 2.4 was all the rage. People abandoning 72 and ham band en
  masse to use 2.4 and selling everything off.  So, why are we not
  seeing it as much in the sailplane world?
  
  At the SW Classic there were not nearly as many as I expected. I did
  not get the count but it was far less than we thought we'd get.  Now,
  I was reviewing the pilot list for the IHLGF and see that there are
  only 4 pilots using 2.4, myself included (53 total entries).
  
  I am using the Futaba Fasst System. I have the 9C Super transmitter
  with the 2.4 Fasst Module and the 607 Fasst receivers in my Blaster,
  Blaster 2 and Vandal. These small receivers fit nicely and the two
  whisker antennas are easily exited from the fuselage.
  
  So far they are working great with no range issues. Admittedly, I have
  not used the system in a crowded environment, but I have no doubt it
  will work fine.
  
  Darwin N. Barrie
  Chandler AZ
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
  unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
  subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with 
  MIME
  turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
  generally NOT in text format
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Mikey and 60 Acres

2008-05-10 Thread Chris Newcomb

Mikey, 
 
You and the electric fliers are entitled to your own opinion, but the 
undisputable fact, yes fact that remains is this. You and your electric 
associates are only able to fly at 60 Acres for one reason and one reason only. 
That reason happens to be the monumental pro bono work lead by non other than 
Sherman Knight. 
 
You said you signed the petition, twice no less! Thanks a lot, Dude!  Many SASS 
members and others have spent hours cranking out letters well past midnight on 
work nights, in addition to other activities. And the postage really can add up.
 
In general the electric fliers have been so silent for so long. Now they are 
dissing General Sherman! 
 
How can you guys even show your faces at the field?
 
Chris
_
With Windows Live for mobile, your contacts travel with you.
http://www.windowslive.com/mobile/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_mobile_052008

RE: [RCSE] Re: written communication nuances

2008-04-28 Thread chris
I agree, but most do not read, but rather skim the text, read what they
think they are reading, and then answer without knowing even their side.

My addage:  It is better to not answer and let people think you are an
idiot, than to reply, and remove all doubt.

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Re: written communication nuances
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, April 28, 2008 3:50 pm
 To: Soaring@airage.com
 
 That's what education was for. We're supposed to know how to read and write 
 effectively. If we can't write with nuances, we can't write jokes. 
 
 If someone is reading one of my posts and steam starts coming out of their 
 ears, most of the time they can most easily remedy this by reading it again, 
 carefully. It's not that I don't make a big mistake once in a while, but 
 generally I'm just trying to lead the reader a ways down the garden path 
 before revealing the punchline. Also, generally, I read the messages over 
 several times before sending them.
 
 (hint: If you see words like organic, idiot, goat, vegan, cannibal, 
 unobtainium, bozo, etc., be suspicious. Chances are I'm pulling your leg. 
 Unless I'm talking about CJD, kuru, etc. Or politics. Come to think of it, is 
 there much difference?)
 Carlos Reyes wrote:
 This is a surprisingly common problem. I read a research report once that 
 studied the effectiveness of written communication. I forget the exact 
 details, but a major finding was that most of the time the reader *thinks* 
 they understood the intended  meaning and emotion, when in fact they didn't. 
 I've learned to be careful in jumping to conclusions and to be very clear in 
 what I write.
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!

2008-04-18 Thread chris
Gordy,


I guess what all this means is that the TX trnansmits your screw-ups
faster to the plane?

Gee, now everyone will see the plane swerve faster left and right as it
approaches the spot.

I'm glad I got the new 9303.

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, April 18, 2008 12:47 pm
 To: Soaring@airage.com
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I have owned an XPS conversion for my 9303 for some time and used it at the  
 SWC in my Woody, the same carbon fuse challenges apply to their system but 
 not 
  much has been done by sailplaners to solve the install to make it work
  
 I'm new to the JR Spektrum systems so spending more time and thought on it  
 right nowand like the rest of us, I've been nagging the experts with  
 questions, so to minimize FAQ's I'll keep sharing what I find out.:-)
  
 I asked if there was a difference between a dedicated 2.4 9303 and  a 9303 
 with a Spektrum 2.4 module, cuz you knowlike all sailplaners I'm  cheap! 
 :-)
  
 I had heard some thing on the fields about one being faster or some such  
 so didn't pay much attention, but there really is a reason to get the  
 dedicated 2.4 TX.
  
 Take a look,
 Integrated 2.4 has 2048  resolution and lower latency (faster response time) 
 then the module system which  reads the PPM data stream coming off the pins 
 into the module. With the module  the speed and feeling is the same as a PCM 
 system.  
  
 Also the integrated  X9303 gives you Model Match (model is linked to the 
 model number in the tx so if  you're not on the correct model it don't work) 
 and 
 Servo Sync (data stream is  changed so servos on the same surface receive 
 data 
 at the same time: most  noticeable on heli collective and elevators on GS 
 models). 
 So there you go!  :-)
 Gordy
 
 
 
 **Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
 listings at AOL Autos.  
 (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp0030002851)

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Sailplane items For Sale

2008-04-08 Thread chris

I am interested in buying the DLG boom.  I assume they are from Denny or
tailbooms.com.



Let me know how you want to handle the exchange.



Chris Adams


  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Sailplane items For Sale
 From: marshall5686 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sun, April 06, 2008 7:41 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com

 Sailplane stuff for sale. Items are posted on Craigslist-Salt Lake City.
 Thanks for looking. Contact me if you have any questions,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Custom TD Competition Sailplane  - Esprit  by Jaro Muller
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/spo/589483011.html

 Falcon 880 Sailplane
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/spo/589475489.html

 Sailplane Winch
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/spo/589439720.html

 Airtronics Stylus - RC Radio - Glid  Memory Cards, 2 Modules
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/sys/589452325.html

 3 Power Slope Scale (PSS) Airplanes Gliders Fiberglass
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/spo/589466254.html

 RC Airplane Floats
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/tag/589402647.html

 BagLady wing bag
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/spo/593584781.html

 HLG Carbon Booms
 http://saltlakecity.craigslist.org/spo/593582072.html


 --
 marshall5686
 
 marshall5686's Profile: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=127822
 View this thread: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=845803

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Fixer upper Pike Perfect

2008-04-08 Thread chris
Hey, That looks like DP's Old F3B plane from the finals in Sacramento, 6
or so years back.  

I thought he had it fixed on the field

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Fixer upper Pike Perfect
 From: Tom Koszuta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, April 08, 2008 5:51 pm
 To: tony estep [EMAIL PROTECTED],  Soaring@airage.com
 
 Tony,
 
 Hey,  In that picture I think I see a goodnever mind.
 
 Tom Koszuta
   - Original Message - 
   From: tony estep 
   To: Soaring@airage.com 
   Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:06 PM
   Subject: Re: [RCSE] Looking for a contest plane
 
 
   Here's a Pike Perfect, a little bit of a fixer-upper:
 
   http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=1806429

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: FW: Re: [RCSE] New Level V: ...Task! April Fools

2008-04-02 Thread chris
Craig, Jim, Bob,

It is nice to know that you can get someone, even the top guys, on a
April Fool's Day!

Somehow, I couldn't resist!

;-)

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: FW: Re: [RCSE] New Level V:  ...Task! April Fools
 From: Craig Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, April 01, 2008 9:51 pm
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],  soaring@airage.com soaring@airage.com
 
 Is it just me or did you all not notice the calender 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 -- Forwarded Message: --
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] New Level V:  ...Task!
 Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:28:17 +
  Gordy,
  
  Thank you for helping me tune up my Supra.  Brian and I flew it today and 
  it 
  goes great!  
  
  Congratulations on your level V flight!  You have certainly fought the good 
  fight to achieve all the requirements.  You are definitely on my Good Guy 
  List.
  
  Regards,
  
  Bob Brown
  
  
   -- Original message --
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   I'm waiting for the actual documentation but it looks like Chris is going 
to 
   be the first LSF member to achieve his LSF April Fools Task Win for  2008!

   Nice work Chris, I'm jealous!
   Gordy
   Minnesota today :-(


   In a message dated 4/1/2008 2:42:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
   New  Level V:  Gordy Gets Final Flight for LSF Level 5 
   
   Congratulations  to Gordy Stahl for finally accomplishing the unexpected.
   Gordy, flying his  new heavy uranium-enriched Suprah, managed to put
   aside all those wearing  the I Beat Gordy button to finally claim a
   place in the anals of the  soaring community.  Unwittingly, well maybe
   so, Gordy climbed on his  beach tractors, braved the winds of hot air
   emanating from himself, to  force his new Suprah down the 10 km course. 
   Gordy, unaccustomed to the  long duration, hooked up his new Kennedy
   Pacemaker battery, using the new  Battery Under Long Life technologies
   (BULL) to extend his penetration  qualities, and overcome the multiple
   shifts in wind direction, to complete  the task .  For those who have the
   I Beat Gordy button on prominent  display on the flight boxes, shirts
   and jackets, don't fret, their history  value will not diminish.  Reports
   are coming in that the AMA has found  out about his accomplishments and
   is asking Gordy to donate his new heavy  Suprah to their building
   committee for incorporation as the cornerstone of  a new basement
   facility for the storage of items from tornado  damage.
   
   From this reporter's perspective, we will need to see what new  things
   develop from the bowels of such great accomplishments.
   
   Way to  GO GORDY!!!
   
   
   RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane  News.  Send subscribe 
   and 
   unsubscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that 
   subscribe and unsubscribe  messages must be sent in text only format with 
   MIME 
   turned off.  Email  sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are 
   generally NOT in text  format
   
   
   
   
   
   **Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL 
   Home.  
   
  (http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15ncid=aolhom00030
   1)
  
  
 
 
 From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:Re: [RCSE] New Level V:  ...Task!
 Date:Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:28:17 +
 
  From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To:Soaring@airage.com
 Subject:[RCSE] New Level V:  ...Task!
 Date:Wed, 2 Apr 2008 01:46:35 +
 
  I'm waiting for the actual documentation but it looks like Chris is 
 going  to be the first LSF member to achieve his LSF April Fools Task Win for 
  2008!
   
  Nice work Chris, I'm jealous!
  Gordy
  Minnesota today :-(
   
   In a message dated 4/1/2008 2:42:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED] writes:
  NewLevel V:  Gordy Gets Final Flight for LSF Level 5 
 
 Congratulationsto Gordy Stahl for finally accomplishing the unexpected.
 Gordy, flying hisnew heavy uranium-enriched Suprah, managed to put
 aside all those wearingthe I Beat Gordy button to finally claim a
 place in the anals of thesoaring community.  Unwittingly, well maybe
 so, Gordy climbed on hisbeach tractors, braved the winds of hot air
 emanating from himself, toforce his new Suprah down the 10 km course. 
 Gordy, unaccustomed to thelong duration, hooked up his new Kennedy
 Pacemaker battery, using the newBattery Under Long Life technologies
 (BULL) to extend his penetrationqualities, and overcome the multiple
 shifts in wind direction, to completethe task .  For those who have the
 I Beat Gordy button on prominentdisplay on the flight boxes, shirts
 and jackets, don't fret, their historyvalue will not diminish.  Reports
 are coming in that the AMA has foundout about his

[RCSE] New Level V: Gordy Gets Final Flight for LSF Level 5

2008-04-01 Thread chris
New Level V:  Gordy Gets Final Flight for LSF Level 5 

Congratulations to Gordy Stahl for finally accomplishing the unexpected.
 Gordy, flying his new heavy uranium-enriched Suprah, managed to put
aside all those wearing the I Beat Gordy button to finally claim a
place in the anals of the soaring community.  Unwittingly, well maybe
so, Gordy climbed on his beach tractors, braved the winds of hot air
emanating from himself, to force his new Suprah down the 10 km course. 
Gordy, unaccustomed to the long duration, hooked up his new Kennedy
Pacemaker battery, using the new Battery Under Long Life technologies
(BULL) to extend his penetration qualities, and overcome the multiple
shifts in wind direction, to complete the task .  For those who have the
I Beat Gordy button on prominent display on the flight boxes, shirts
and jackets, don't fret, their history value will not diminish.  Reports
are coming in that the AMA has found out about his accomplishments and
is asking Gordy to donate his new heavy Suprah to their building
committee for incorporation as the cornerstone of a new basement
facility for the storage of items from tornado damage.

From this reporter's perspective, we will need to see what new things
develop from the bowels of such great accomplishments.

Way to GO GORDY!!!


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Stab mount and stab

2008-03-31 Thread chris
Bud Elder make them.  Bud Elder ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

I will forward an email under a separate thread to you.

Chris Adams


  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Stab mount and stab
 From: Buzz Averill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, March 31, 2008 11:37 am
 To: RCSE soaring@airage.com
 
 Anyone know of an after-market source for a stab and stab mount to fit 
 on a Supra tailboom? I know Barry sells them but I'm hoping to find a 
 less expensive source. I have broken two Supra stabs and one Supra stab 
 mount while winch launching. Not every timebut it has happened twice.
 
 Buzz Averill 
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Re: Hinge Tape

2008-03-27 Thread chris
Burt,

I used to work for a company that was associated with tapes.

Try http://www.azcoat.com

I have used some sample polyester films on my F3B (small) ship a while
back, and on my Current DLG hinges.

It is polyester, fairly thin, clear.  I have not been disappointed.  If
they won't give you a sample, ping me and I'll send a sample as I have
alot.

You can then ask then for a quote.

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: Hinge Tape
 From: Burt Pickard-Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, March 27, 2008 3:31 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com
 
 http://www.hilaunch.com/
 
 At 05:07 PM 3/27/2008, Phil Barnes wrote:
 
 - Original Message - From: Bill Swingle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I suggest the hinge tape sold by Don Richmond. It's good stuff, 
 quite strong and adhesive.
 I'm sure that tape is great stuff, but is Don Bullet proof? I think 
 the poster was asking for a bullet proof manufacturer :-)
 
 Phil
 
 I am looking for a bullet proof hinge tape manufacturer.
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
 subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
 turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
 are generally NOT in text format
 
 Burt Pickard-Richardson
 710 Augusta
 Oak Park, IL
 
  60302-1616
 
 
 Home Phone  708 848 9266
 Cell Phone  708 703 7290
 
 In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in 
 practice there is.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] JR 9303 Flap Programming Question

2008-03-08 Thread Chris Rose
I just got a 9303 for an incredible price, and have run into a wall
trying to convert all my gliders over to it. I've followed this post
as a guide from rcgroups:


http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=347609

My problem is that I try adjusting the flaps in the flap rates and
camber mix menus, but I don't see any change in the flaps as I move
the various switches for the various flight modes. I'm trying to
program a Berg 4l, berg 7 channel, and a jr700 rx. Is there something
that I'm missing? I've tried to program this like I would my JR 6102,
but this is an entirely different beast.

FYI, I'm trying to program three DLGs, and a 3M Trio, as well as a
couple of 2Ms.

Thanks for the help,

Chris Rose
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] test

2008-03-02 Thread Chris Hallquist

test
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] covering

2008-03-02 Thread Chris Hallquist
I just got a new color of Monokote its a Neon Yellow and thought it 
would be a great color for my Genie Pro's tail feathers I'm building. 
But the result was not what I wanted. Ive used the other opac colors 
from them and they shrank much better than this type. Also is there 
better covering out  there you guys have tried that is more forgiving. 
I'd like some feed back if possible.


 Thanks  Chris Hallquist  PBSS
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Seriously offended - A common occurrence

2008-02-28 Thread chris
Hi Ira,

Per the comments below from the rest of the posting gang, I have to also
agree with them. Emails often are hard to read the way the author writes
them.  Likewise, if you post, like I have, you will get the same reply. 
You will be slapped down.  Turn the other cheek, and realize we are all
have a bit of idiot in us all.  Heaven knows, everyone will tell us
so.

In general, you have to be thick skinned (as noted below), you have to
learn to use you delete key, and you have to know that is it just water
rolling off a turtle's back.

In many cases, those who reply only see what they want to see and read,
and have their ways set in stone. I, too, feel the same many times.

What all this does is make you sit back and not reply.  That is not to
say that sitting back is good, but it does make you realize that flying
is alot better than being an armchair pilot.

Then againyou could switch to a Woody class to get your LSF V wins
when you strike out in the Open class.  Woodies are for Old Timers 
LOL.

Chris Adams



  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Seriously offended
 From: Ira Faberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, February 28, 2008 9:37 am
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],  Soaring@airage.com,  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thanks guys. At least I am not alone in taking offense. It now remains
 to be seen how magnanimous a man Gordy is.

 On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:58 AM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  Ira,
   Welcome to RCSE!  Gordy Offends Everyone it's his job! Although I have to
  admit he gets to grow on you when you figure him out. LJ
 
 
  Oooh..  Now you can expect a private email from the G-dude himself
  correcting
  you of your ways.  :)
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Ira Faberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: soaring Soaring@airage.com, gordysoar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:48:13 -0700
  Subject: [RCSE] Seriously offended
 
   Gordy-
  
   You said Come on you guys, get involved and share! and when I took
   your invitation to share, you call my carefully thought out work
   silly and wacky and claim it has nothing to do with reality? Your
   behavior is offensive to me.
 
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
  unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
  subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
  MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
  are generally NOT in text format
 
 
 
 
 
  
  Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL
  Living.
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Dedicated to Gordy!

2008-02-13 Thread chris
I don't see a problem...Just hop on the Snowmobile and go trolling.




  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Dedicated to Gordy!
 From: Chuck Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, February 13, 2008 9:32 am
 To: soaring@airage.com
 
 At 10:21 AM 2/13/2008, you wrote:
 I guess I don't understand the problems most people have with 
 winter.  Sure sunny weather is great but if its sunny all the time 
 when do you build?  Here in the PNW it was another great day.  It 
 rained all day so I got lots of building done before I headed out to 
 the slope.  It was fantastic.  One of the best days I've had on the 
 slope in a while.   The seenery was beautiful, the conditions were 
 near perfect with moderate winds and temps in the upper 
 20's.  Tomorrow night I'm going back to the slope for some more 
 turns.  I just can't get enough of skiing.
 
 and you?
 
 But the ski boat has trouble with the ice flows.   :)
 
 Chuck 
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Tree story, actually a helicopter

2008-02-01 Thread chris
In another 1970's story, Rick Norwood, of the Soaring Union of Los
Angles (SULA), launched a Javelin Open class ship and did an active
zoom-type launch at the top.  For those unaware of the Javelin series,
these were rolled plywood fuselage R/E planes with straight dihedral
wings and up-swept curved tips to help thermaling.  The wings of these
planes used a center mount with a single main wingpin and small
alignment pins in the rear of the root airfoil.  The wing then was held
in place with rubber bands internally.  Anyway, when the plane zoomed
off the top the wing flexed and shifted and the alignment pin
disengaged, and one wing panel flipped over (rotated) so that the
airfoil was now inverted for the panel.  The plane promptly went into a
kind of flat spin.  Application of rudder one way, slowed the spin and
application of rudder the other way increased the spin rate.  The plane
looked OK until it caught a thermal in this spinning mode and we watched
it climb out.  Elevator did nothing.  We started to chase it in cars and
followed it nearly 3/4 of a mile as it disappeared into an industrial
park.  Catching up with we expected to see it in a re-kittable form, but
to our surprise, it was sitting pretty, unharmed between two industrial
warehouses.

I guess the helicopter action was not like a spiral death to the ground.

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Tree story, actually a pipe
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, January 31, 2008 12:46 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com

 In the late 70's/early 80's at one of the early Visalia Fall Soaring 
 Festivals at the high school site,  Don Doe (past NCSL Champion) was flying a 
 Paragon on yellow and white, a frequency that was also an emergency CHP 
 channel. Suddenly during a nice flight well above launch height Don lost 
 control of the plane. It came all the way down in a series of spirals and 
 dives finally disappearing from sight when it dove into a large drainage 
 ditch with a ten foot berm on both sides, and  near a culvert under a road 
 that bordered the field. Don  started walking to retreive the werckage when 
 suddenly to everyone's shock and awe the Paragon appeared in a near vertical 
 climb ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD. Don regained control and landed the 
 plane safely. Unbelievably, the plane had flown through the culvert (I 
 remember that it was about 12' diameter) without hitting anything.
 Mike Clancy
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Contest Format

2008-01-11 Thread chris
Tom, Larry, All:

The Munich F3K German Open had entries starting 12/1/2007 per the
spreadsheet.  It was only this Monday that a note was sent by Phil
Barnes telling us that there were 85 entries already and if you wanted
to go, you needed to submit an app ASAP.  The US/world frenzie started
and luckily I was able to get in.

I will have to say that DLG is more Competitor-friendly versus F3B/J
events. I think that the simplicity of DLG with regard to launching, as
well as MOM competition rounds, are some of the main reasons US DLG
pilots are more interested.  Additionally, flying areas are more
available and two or more people can fly together.  DLG is alot like
whatparkflyers are for electrics.  Personally, when I am at the local
park flying my DLG I have many people come over to see it and wonder how
I am getting it up so high.  Electric parkflyer pilots often get jealous
when I can fly for 2 hours while they have to sit around and wait for a
charge and then buzz around for only 10 minutes.  Think about it.  Look
at Visalia, for example and the 20 or more DLG pilots that fly after the
contest, no waiting around.

Do I see alot of pilots coming into soaring, yes.  It's only that they
are choosing DLG versus the social TD waiting contests.

I agree with Tom that we need to play hardball and not do cushy
contests.

Like I have been doing for the IHLGF contests the past 5 years, I am
going to try to take pictures of each plane and pilot and alot more when
I attend the German Open.  If I do not do well, I will at least inject
myself with the design and flying enthusiasm they have over there.  We
need to share technology and flying skills, not have them softened by
waiting around.  I know I will be drinking alot of beer with those guys
like we do here.

Chris Adams

  Original Message 
 Subject: RE: [RCSE] Contest Format
 From: Tom Copp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, January 11, 2008 9:44 am
 To: Soaring@airage.com

 Yes, I see the same thing too. The Europeans make F3J and F3B the F1 of
 soaring and because they do they bring in the new guys.

 You will get your butt kicked when you start out and what do they do to help
 you? Nothing.its sink or swim. The best teacher I ever had was a good ass
 kicking!  Getting old? Can't see? Tough, move over old man there are 50 new
 guys waiting to replace you.



 No one is complaining about buying a winch or model and in many cases it's
 more difficult over there to come up with Toy Money plus the cost to
 travel to a comp is expensive. Yes sure Europe is small but have you ever
 drove from Spain/France to Germany? Shoot the toll fees will exceed the cost
 of fuel (at 8.00+ a gallon!) yet contests are full and the parties are well
 worth the effort.



 The USA TD contest pilots are dieing. I mean literally dieing (RIP) no new
 blood. The writing has been on the wall for years.. Its time to read the
 wall.



 Tom





 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:16 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Soaring@airage.com
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Contest Format



 A note in support of Tom's comments, I noticed that the Munich F3k Contest
 registration opened up last week.  I was considering going over and was
 trying to organize it with some friends. The competition was full in 3 days
 110 confirmed 15 on a back up list. I have seen this over and over in
 European Events. I have also noticed a younger crowd showing up. My Best
 regards Larry

 

 Wow lots of stuff here.

 In general contests outside the USA are well attended. Contests attendance
 inside the USA is diminishing.  Why?

 Outside the USA they typically fly F3J or a local version of F3J with F3B
 winches that the pilots supply btw. They are strict about being on the line
 in time; they don't soften the task for anyone. They play hardball over
 there and their attendance is thriving.

 snip

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Contest Format

2008-01-10 Thread chris


Why not just have everyone fly for 10 minutes to qualify for a landing
attempt with 1 meter concentric divisions like f3J.  After all, isn't
that what it's about?  Why not give bonus points for landing if they are
within 2 seconds over the time.  If they are short of 10 minutes then
zero flight points.

Isn't that what all the top experts do in each contest.

If you can't make the time, what makes you think you are good enough to
get landing points either?

BTW, DLG contests do MOM all the time.

The thought pattern is TOTALLY different in DLG contests.  There is a
set task, either you make it or you don't. The only thing I constantly
hear is how many points did you DROP, not how many points did you
achieve.

This is not basketball, it is more like Golf.  The course is rated and
you know the task (par value) and you are being measured on what you can
or cannot achieve.

Chris

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Contest Format

2008-01-10 Thread chris
This is Match play, just like they do in FF.  You either max the time,
or you are out!

It does not matter what time you set, just that it has to be maxed.  If
you want to add difficulty, then just increase the flight time 1 or 2
minutes per round.

We did a type of this contest in DLG at Visalia in 2006.  I was CD.  I
had an airhorn.  Everyone launched, and when 10 seconds had passed, the
horn blew, and every pilot had to do a loop, then the first pilots down
were eliminated.  Next I made them do a loop at 10 second, then another
at 30 seconds.  It went on.  Would you believe it that we got up to 4
loops then wait 20 seconds and then 4 more loops.  Scoring was obvious,
you made it or you didn't.  The last round was tough as pilots pulled
out with about 4 inches to spare.



  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Contest Format
 From: tony estep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, January 10, 2008 2:16 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com

 Original message:
 ...short of 10 minutes then zero flight points. Isn't that what all the top 
 experts do in each contest.

 If you can't make the time, what makes you think you are good enough to get 
 landing points either?
 ===
 Which suggests a slight variation on the 10-9-8 etc. scheme: Only the maxers 
 or round-winners get to go on to the next round -- everybody else is 
 eliminated. That would really move things along.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Contest Format

2008-01-10 Thread chris
Nope, I MEAN no flight points because you never made the 10 minutes to
be able to qualify for any sort of landing.  Well..I guess it eliminated
landing points too.

Brutal!

  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Contest Format
 From: Jeff Steifel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, January 10, 2008 2:23 pm
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: RCSE (E-mail) soaring@airage.com

 I think you meant zero the landing points, not the flight points.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Why not just have everyone fly for 10 minutes to qualify for a landing
  attempt with 1 meter concentric divisions like f3J.  After all, isn't
  that what it's about?  Why not give bonus points for landing if they are
  within 2 seconds over the time.  If they are short of 10 minutes then
  zero flight points.
 
  Isn't that what all the top experts do in each contest.
 
  If you can't make the time, what makes you think you are good enough to
  get landing points either?
 
  BTW, DLG contests do MOM all the time.
 
  The thought pattern is TOTALLY different in DLG contests.  There is a
  set task, either you make it or you don't. The only thing I constantly
  hear is how many points did you DROP, not how many points did you
  achieve.
 
  This is not basketball, it is more like Golf.  The course is rated and
  you know the task (par value) and you are being measured on what you can
  or cannot achieve.
 
  Chris
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
  unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
  unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. 
   Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT 
  in text format
 
 
 
 

 --
 Jeff Steifel

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Best 2 Meter for NATS

2008-01-04 Thread chris
Once again, the winch requirement excludes the development of new 2M
designs and defaults the designs to the main requirement that they only
be able to haul the lines up.  This requirement only favors those planes
that are commercially built or those that have so much wing area and
airfoil thickness that we get back into the old design arguments of
years past.

One of these days a plane will be able to take into account other design
factors besides this limited one.

IMHO

Chris





  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Best 2 Meter for  NATS
 From: Barry Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, January 04, 2008 6:00 am
 To: RCSE soaring@airage.com

 Gentleman,

 Go with the winner... a Organic 2M. Craig Greening won 2007 NATS flying 
 the Organic 2M.

 Regards,

 Barry
 Kennedy Composites
 www.kennedycomposites.com

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Brain Fart : Definitely a FART

2008-01-04 Thread chris
I can't believe that the response of Gordy's is a Joke or What?

Hey Gordy, you propose that we get rid of Winch altogether.  WOW, what a
novel Idea!  You design a plane that you can grab by a wingtip and
throw with all your might.  Gee...maybe you can do some running to get
more speed up and then twist around like a ballet dancer and then let go
of the plane.  I know, I know, it's been years since your Arther Murray
dancing lessons were completed and you are a bit rusty. But heck, it
gets you out of the house.

And can anyone thermal out with a plane after throwing it  Hey, I
heard of this guys who went to Japan and convinced them that he should
be able to use his big TD plane, I think it was a Icon, and throw it. 
There were guys there who were doing something like you suggest, that
is, taking a smaller plane and throwing it.  In fact, I think they
developed tasks that were challenging for them, but maybe not for your
expertise.

It's always great to hear the ideas of experts and LSF Level V
aspirants like yourself when they come up with these new flying classes
and tasks.

Keep the ideas coming!

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE]  Brain Fart or Challenge?
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, January 04, 2008 10:23 am
 To: Soaring@airage.com

 Wow Jack ,

 You are really on to it with this shortening lines thing !  I sat  around for
 quite a few minutes before I thought of something even dumber ...but  I
 managed! :-)

 I'm thinking with us getting older and the cost of fuel to lug winches
 around, and if its really about pilot skill and thermal reading/working...lets
 just hand toss the damn things and call for 20min tasks.

 We'd be able to get in about 40 rounds per day so that would make  contests
 that much more attractive to attend, and of course set up would be  minimal,
 also no hassles with changing turnarounds for wind direction, and those
 mysterious bastards who you all seem to know are out there who take advantage 
 of
 line breaks and pop offs, well 'they' will be out of luck with no lines to 
 break
 and no pop offs.

 Setting up the models will be easier because there will be no need to
 agonize over tow hook placement, elevator comps or camber switch  programming.
 Those of you who haven't figured out how to program your JR  radios so that
 there's no need to flip a switch to make the throttle stick  camber or 
 landing lever
 in mid flight, again no worries, not needed any  more.

 Dang it makes so much sense, so logical, can't figure out why you guys
 didn't think of this sooner!

 That new 150 SupraDurpraIcon will devour the soaring scene! I mean it  will
 have to have a glide advantage and no worries about clogging up contests  with
 broken line concerns. (and will provide fodder to RC Groups about it having
 an unfair advantage demanding that owners leave its tips off).

 300'?  I laugh!  Lets show 'those' guys at contest that us real  men want a
 true soaring eventlets get rid of winches all together!
 What do you think Chicago?  You guys seem to have been sitting around
 thinking up good ideas :-)

 Shorten the lines and you can bet the line will get shorter.

 Gordy :-)


 In a message dated 1/4/2008 10:46:19 A.M. Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I agree  with you Jack, but I think the distance to the turnaround
 should be  even shorter, maybe 300ft

 Buzz Averill

 On Jan 1, 2008, at 8:48  PM, schrederman wrote:

 
  Well I posted this under Best  wishes for 2008... but not too many
  looked
  at it... So  here goes :eek:
 
  For this year, I'd like to issue a challenge  to the soaring community.
  For 30 years, we've been launching as high  as possible, trying to stay
  aloft for 10 minutes, and coming down on a  spot, carrying a skeg that
  many times arrests on the line rather than  the ground. That gets old...
  in fact it got old a long time  ago...
 
  My challenge is to standardize the American TD winch,  including line
  strength, and to do away with landing skegs. I also  think the
  turnaround should be no more than 600' from the launch  point. Let's put
  some challenge back into this. Flame suit  ON!
 
  Jack (Darth) Womack
 
 
  --
  schrederman
   ---
  -
  schrederman's Profile:
   http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=13218
  View this  thread:
   http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=794683
 
   RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send
  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Please note that subscribe  and unsubscribe messages must be sent in
  text only format with  MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based
  email such as  Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
 

 RCSE-List  facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only

[RCSE] RE: Icon 2: Lines in a Twist

2007-12-20 Thread chris
This is all Bogus, What is everyone getting their lines in a Twist?

No where does it say that a CD must provide launching mechanisms for
specific plane designs.

What is the problem???  A CD provides a launch method that can launch
all planes.  Just because the same launching system cannot get 2Meter
planes launched high is not his problem.

The Airbus is only the Airbus because GE, or whomever, makes a engine
that can power the plane.  So what if the little planes cannot travel
across the great herring pond as efficiently as the big ones.

Heck, if the line breaks, just get bigger lines or stronger lines.  In
Fishing they use wire lines to met the stronger requirements.  What's
the problem here, can't the old Icon 1 or the Sharon , or perhaps the
High End have better winches for them to use?  You can also use
clothesline rope if you want.

There is nothing in any rule book that says lighter lines need be
provided.  So, buck it up and get a better launching plane.  Get rid of
that old NOS  or woodie class and come into the REAL world.

I am sick of everyone thinking that we have to cater to the lighter
planes.  If the Icon 1 can't launch on the new winches, then get off
your tails and get a plane that can launch.

This is so bogus to hear  everyone complain.  Look at all the
aerodynamic and composite advancements, and use them.

Duu.

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon 2
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, December 20, 2007 9:08 am
 To: soaring@airage.com

 In a message dated 12/20/2007 8:48:45 AM Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I'm sure this will be a very dynamic plane and competitive with the Euro
 models. My concern is the launching equipment. With the current crop of 
 moldies,
 line breaks and winch bogging and ultimate failure are becoming more 
 prevelant.
  Heavy enough line for these new super ships, will be a burden for the
 lighter planes. Yes, I've CD'd lots of contests and a few big ones.

 We've tried some heavy line and it is great for the heavier planes but the
 lighter planes and 2 meters have a helluva time overcoming the line drag and
 weight.

 Where do we draw the line?

 Darwin N. Barrie
 Chandler AZ

 

 It could be that the wing area is not more than the Sharon, just a higher
 aspect ratio, and that it won't generate more lift, but will just have less 
 drag
 and be more efficient.

 Bill Wingstedt




 **See AOL's top rated recipes
 (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop000304)
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Icon 2

2007-12-20 Thread chris
Why not just get rid of the pulley system and go to a single man tow?

Or maybe, the pilot should run to launch the plane like a kite`while the
plane is on autopilot???  

Just creative suggestions!

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Icon 2
 From: Mike Lachowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, December 20, 2007 9:45 am
 To: tony estep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: soaring@airage.com
 
 Go to a weaker winch motor.  If the winch motor can't break the line, 
 then the motor stops turning.  For anyone who has used a F3b winch, you 
 know what happens.  The F3b winch motors will only draw roughly 500 Amps 
 stalled while a Ford winch will go to 1000 amps or more.   Then you live 
 with the lower input power.
 
 tony estep wrote:
  The 2-man tow setup puts a practical limit on F3J, but apparently that 
  limit is not fully compatible with the standard U.S. winch setup; that is, 
  it seems that the F3J scheme can launch bigger planes than our typical 
  winches like to handle. One imagines a nightmare scenario where the planes 
  keep getting bigger, and eventually as clubs need to replace their launch 
  gear, they'll turn to super-power Injoy or similar winches, and the cycle 
  will repeat, and finally we'll be flying models 40% of full-scale like the 
  gas-power boys.
 
 
 

 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Schedule

2007-12-11 Thread chris
Oh Mighty Carnac:

Do not knock DLG just because you do not fly it!  

CA

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Schedule
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, December 11, 2007 1:19 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com
 
 No Tom (B), its shoving RES (HL on Steroids) down the throats of anyone that 
 cares to fly any/all of the other TD events.  Great for Chuck, crappy for 
 those that don't play hyper-HL.  Seems to me that RES should follow UNL in 
 this schedule, so the traditional multi-function events flow one after the 
 other.  
 
 JT
 
 
 
 
 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:09:37 -0500
 From: TJB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: RCSE Soaring Exchange Soaring@airage.com
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Dates/Schedule (R/C Soaring  R/C Electric)
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Interesting arrangement.  Making those NOS guys fly two meter : )
 T
 - Original Message - 
 From: Tom Kallevang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: RCSE Soaring Exchange Soaring@airage.com; Balsa Sailplanes 
 Exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]; USA_FAI_Soaring Exchange 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 10:43 AM
 Subject: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Dates/Schedule (R/C Soaring  R/C Electric)
 
 
  To all:
 
  2008 Nats forms should be available on the AMA site shortly after
  January 1, 2008.
 
  Soaring Dates are:
 
  Sun July 27:   NOS on Stage Center and HLG on the 600x600
  Mon-Tue July 28-29:2Meter
  Wed July 30: RES
  Thu-Fri July 31-Aug 1: Unlimited
  Sat-Sun Aug 2-3:   XC on Stage Center and F3B on the 600x600
 
  Electric Nats Dates:
 
  Monday Aug 4:  X5J Extreme
  Tuesday Aug 5:  1/2A LMR Sailplane
  Wednesday Aug 6: A LMR Sailplane
  Thursday Aug 7:  B LMR Sailplane
 
  NEAC Sport Sailplane and 1/2A Texaco will be held as after hours
  events.
 
  LSF website will be updated shortly.
 
 
 
  Tom Kallevang
  Wheeling, IL
  LSF President  Webmaster
  LSF #303 Level V #103
  AMA L292
  SOAR (Chicago)
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Schedule

2007-12-11 Thread chris
Gee Denny, I thought winter started with the Gordy Equinox and the
changing of the moons?

BTW, When is the official starting weekend of Gordy Bashing

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Schedule
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, December 11, 2007 2:07 pm
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],  [EMAIL PROTECTED],  soaring@airage.com
 
 Thus we have the official beginning of winter on RCSE
 
 
  
 
 
 Denny Maize
 www.polecataero.com
 717-789-0146
 
  
 
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John Diniz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Bill's Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]; soaring@airage.com
 Sent: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 5:00 pm
 Subject: RE: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Schedule
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Again this Nat's thing is being held in the MID-WEST!!! Gosh Dernnit
 I ain't gonna fly it until it's on the west coast. You know some of the
 best flyers are on the west coast so it really isn't a true National
 Championship unless it's on the west coast.
 
 Wait.. I live 3 hrs from the Nat's...
 
 Please disregard my previous statement.
 JD
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill's Email [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 3:55 PM
 To: soaring@airage.com
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] 2008 Nats Schedule
 
 What?? No Open Scale hand launch cross country??
 
 Kurt Zimmerman wrote:
  Gives us entertainment for the up and coming year  :-)
 
 
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
 and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note
 that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
 with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail
 and AOL are generally NOT in text format
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that 
 subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME 
 turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are 
 generally NOT in text format
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
 http://webmail.aol.com

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


FW: [RCSE] DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY; Benchmarks- Get Real.

2007-12-03 Thread Chris Newcomb

Too bad Brian Smith does not live over here, he could fly my planes for me 
while I drink beer!
 
Cheers!!! Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:31:10 -0600 To: soaring@airage.com From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [RCSE] DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY; 
Benchmarks- Get Real.  That is about how long it takes me to get my 132 inch 
span RES model  ready to fly after I get to the field. The model fits in my 
van  ready to fly except that the outer wing panels have to be plugged in  
and taped on. The model was designed with a 3 piece wing with a 48  inch 
center wing that will fit in my van when bolted to the fuselage.  If someone 
has a winch set up, it takes me longer that that to get  from my van to the 
winch. If Brian Smith is there, he often has my  model assembled by the time I 
get out of the van. :)  Chuck  At 01:29 AM 12/3/2007, you wrote: 
Everybody has good points but listen to this. I place my 2 or 3  DLG's in 
the back of my minivan, assembled and ready to fly. The one  I want to fly 
first is charging as I drive to the field. I get to  the field, put my card 
on the board and am flying 180 seconds later.   Admitedly, sometimes 
there is very little low level lift, but other than that,  Beat that!  
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. 
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format
_
You keep typing, we keep giving. Download Messenger and join the i’m Initiative 
now.
http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGLM

RE: [RCSE] DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY; Benchmarks- Get Real.

2007-12-02 Thread Chris Newcomb

Everybody has good points but listen to this. I place my 2 or 3 DLG's in the 
back of my minivan, assembled and ready to fly. The one I want to fly first is 
charging as I drive to the field. I get to the field, put my card on the board 
and am flying 180 seconds later. 
 
 
Admitedly, sometimes there is very little low level lift, but other than that,
 
Beat that! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: soaring@airage.com Subject: [RCSE] 
DLGs = Bang for the Buck, NO WAY; Benchmarks- Get Real. Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 
19:22:18 +  I have to disagree with Buzz regarding DLG being the best 
value. I agree that DLG has made HL more accessible to all pilots due it the 
ergonomics of launching them. But value, for that lets take a step back and 
look at it from a distance.  When evaluated analytically, DLG is absolutely 
the worst value in soaring today. Lets take the recent example of the $1000 
Vandal (all up ready to fly) that was snapped up off of RCSE recently. For 
simplicity assume that the plane weighs 10 oz all up. A simple calculation 
yields $100/oz.   Now lets take a Supra at $2000 (all up: plane plus radio 
gear) at 65 oz. Same simple calculation yields $31/oz.   OK, next up on the 
list is an SBXC at $2500 (all up, plane plus radio plus vario) at 176 oz. 
Crank, crank, the calculator tells me $14.25/oz.  Getting the drift here? Now 
lets take Sagitta 900 at $350 (kit plus gear) weighing 40 oz. Push the little 
beads on the abacus and what comes out: $8.75/oz.  Disclaimer- this doesn't 
assign any value for building, enjoying, etc. Then again, nobody really makes 
money out of the hobby, we all do it for fun, no?   So, what is really more 
cost effective, soaring gold (DLG), or history (Sagitta)?   On a kind of 
related topic, I've been having a great laugh about all this benchmark garbage. 
What a bunch of subjective tripe. All I really see is reminiscing about what 
gets an individual's attention and represents progress to them.   I've been 
in the technology business for 40 years, and if I've learned anything, true 
paradigms define themselves without any help. By their very nature, the 
direction that technology goes after the paradigm emerges will change because 
of the paradigm.   As my buddy Bubba would say, Y'all have a ball getting 
yer undies twisted with this one.   Jim Thomas RCSE-List facilities 
provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be 
sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
_
Your smile counts. The more smiles you share, the more we donate.  Join in.
www.windowslive.com/smile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_oprsmilewlhmtagline

RE: [RCSE] First Euro Moldie to win a USA major

2007-12-01 Thread chris
Gordy,

Moldie does not mean that it had to have flap or ailerons. That is not
what makes a moldie.

The Cumulus, not Cirrus, had foam cores that were covered, pressed for a
wing airfoil and washout, and the fuse was plastic molded.

But that is still molded.

Cirruses never had flaps.  The German vellum plans had them
withairlerons, and the poster paper type plans did nothave them with
ailerons.



LOL

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] First Euro Moldie to win a USA major
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Sat, December 01, 2007 1:13 am
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],  Soaring@airage.com

 How about the first Euro moldie to win a USA major?   Know what it was,
 who flew it and where it won?  Pretty  sure it was the first Euro moldie
 to have bottom hinged flaps  too.

 I'd love to see a Cirrus with bottom hinged flaps :-).

 So does this mean, there was a bench mark event in rc soaring history and
 you guys didn't notice?

 Gordy





 **Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
 products.
 (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop000301)

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Want a bench mark plane example??

2007-11-30 Thread chris
SNIP
How about the first Euro moldie to win a USA major?  Know what it was,
who flew it and where it won?  Pretty sure it was the first Euro moldie
to have bottom hinged flaps too.

Here's a hint, it was produced by the maker of the current 2m, 3m and
RES ships flying in the USA today.:-)
Gordy

SNIP

Gordy,

Nope...ding, ding, ding, ding, wrong answer for Jepordy!

For that you need to go WAY back before your time!

It was Dr. Barbara Henon, flying a molded, composite Graupner Cumulus,
in an LSF tournament in 1973 (?) at Miles Square Park in Southern Calif.

Yes, a woman in a man's sport.  She was also president of the LSF.

The Model fits all the requirements for moldies and composites of today.

Think about it.

LOLOLOL

Chris


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] RE: Benchmarks? RADS? Refinements? Designing?

2007-11-30 Thread chris
Well Stated.

Chris

  Original Message 
 Subject: Benchmarks? RADS? Refinements? Designing?
 From: Harley Michaelis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, November 29, 2007 4:23 pm
 To: soaring@airage.com soaring@airage.com
 
 I'm sitting here with nothing to do while waiting on some supplies. I've 
 been reading the current batch of messages and wondering how to make 
 some meaningful contribution.
 
 A little history. . . I've been involved in modeling since age 6 when 
 Lindbergh's flight to Paris got me inspired. When the big Depression hit 
 shortly thereafter, money for discretionary spending became 
 non-existent. For building materials, I cut up wood apple boxes, cedar 
 shingles, fence posts,  bamboo rakes, lumber yard scrap and cedar cigar 
 boxes. Balsa? . .what was that? Glues were leftover paste and mucilage 
 from school and oh yeah, Lepage's 48 Hour Iron Glue. Covering material 
 was common tissue paper. I later discovered modeling tissue, banana oil, 
 silk and aircraft dope to make free flight stuff. I never heard of a kit 
 until I was in high school, but who had cash for those? Well, I did save 
 my pennies for a year and once spent $3 for a rubber-powered cabin 
 model kit. It had a folding prop and flew out of sight one day on a 
 thermal. Bummer.
 
 My point is that to have a model, it was necessary to be resourceful and 
 creative. I have since continually experimented and learned things, 
 always doing original work. The joy and satisfaction of making new 
 discoveries is as compelling as it ever was.
 
 After high school, college, the military, family and my then wife's 
 resentment of models, I got sidetracked from modeling for 20 years.. I 
 picked it up again in the mid-1960's after hearing about some guys in 
 California slope soaring with accompaniment by eagles. RC was in its 
 commercial beginnings. Knowing rudimentary design I started doing my own 
 RC stuff and soon began offering construction articles to the magazines. 
 With RC kits a rarity, these went over well and all total some 17 
 original design construction articles were published.  Some of you may 
 remember the older ones such as the Duoflex, Tri-Belle, Miskeet, Hi-Pro, 
 Mod-Pod, Spirit of Freedom, Atrix, Keetah, Buzzbat, Jouster, etc. All 
 were different with many innovations. Modeler-builders built these ships 
 from scratch. Other modeler-designers contributed to the magazines and 
 ideas freely flowed through the pages.
 
 I see Dodgson Designs often mentioned with affection. I attended many a 
 contest where virtually all would have one. I'd have an unkitted 
 original.By virtue of superior numbers, whether Dodgson or other kits, 
 kitted designs became prominent in competition circles. Well, sure. They 
 are what was being flown the most and by capable fliers.
 
 After a season ended up here in the NWSS, Bob would run ads pointing out 
 that our Season Champ flew some Dodgson design, which was rightfully 
 good publicity. An amusing instance took place in 1990. I was Season 
 champ in both Open and 2M flying my Jouster, the predecessor to the big 
 Genie and the 2M version. It did not go over well with Bob that I was 
 Season Champ. Of course, had I been flying a Dodgson Design, it would 
 have been just fine. BTW, I did build and fly a big Maestro a few times, 
 but sold it, preferring my own stuff.
 
 As sailplane kits became abundant, guys went for them and things began 
 to change. The magazines no longer wanted state-of-the-art 
 scratch-builder construction articles. Capable designer-builders gave up 
 and quit contributing. The magazines began dumbing down airframe 
 development content. With the advent of the ARF, this trend has only 
 been exacerbated.
 
 I see comments to the effect that only minor refinements have been 
 offered to ARF designs, but nothing really new or different. I agree. 
 Stagnation has taken over as the creative capabilities of those who used 
 to be real builder-modelers have been left to wither away from lack of use.
 
 I may be one of very few who remains motivated to do original thinking 
 about scratch-buildable airframe design. As ever more sophisticated 
 ARF's have appeared, I keep finding ways to make my designs simpler, 
 lighter, stronger, prettier, more practical and more capable.
 
 In case you haven't noticed, I do not offer airframes for sale. My 
 thrust is to encourage and support whose who want to learn to scratch 
 build sophisticated airframes that can compete with the ARFs. Build one 
 of mine for starters and you will have acquired knowledge and techniques 
 to design and build designs of your own. Go to my website 
 http://genie.rchomepage.com. Different features? Read the file What's A 
 Genie?  Look at the pictures in the Gallery. Look at File 12 and get 
 busy building a Smooth Genie Pro.
 
 Since mentioned about a month ago that Genie line plans could be viewed 
 on line at my website, over 1600 new views have occurred. Interest

RE: [RCSE] Re: Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs

2007-11-30 Thread chris
Mark,

I like your comments.  Obviously, a Mirage would not compare to today's
floaters, but it was designed more than 30 years ago. It might still
give the current RES ships a bit of competiton.  At the time, Blaine
addressed both the lightness of structure as well as the strength of a
thick one piece center section.  What also can be noted is that the
large wing was more transportable as a 3-piece wing.  Please recall that
Blaine also wrote a well received article about dihedral angles for the
wings that have been often quoted by designers to this day.

BTW, I have a few other pictures of the plane I used in Dave Thornburg's
contest that is on your website.

I still have the plane I used and was thinking of recovering it and
flying it in nostalgia at Poway!

Thermals,

Chris Adams





  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs
 From: Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Fri, November 30, 2007 11:33 am
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],  Soaring@airage.com

 History states that Mark Drela built a Mirage a few years back and liked it 
 so much that he decided to build a modern version. Thus was born the Bubble 
 Dancer. Of course you would fly a Bubble Dancer against a Mirage and feel 
 confident you would win. It has 30 years head start in technology 
 advancement. I would say both were benchmarks and they are both related. They 
 both took the status quo and changed it to status not so quo.


 Mark MIller
 Isthmus Models

 - Original Message 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Soaring@airage.com
 Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:16:59 PM
 Subject: [RCSE] Re: Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs


 Afraid I must disagree with you about floaters. While I'll grant that
  the Mirage may have been a benchmark, I'd be willing to fly a good
  Bubble Dancer vs. you with a Mirage any day. (Not that I'd necessarily win,
  we all know it's the pilot, and I don't know you so you may fly a lot
  better than I do.) If it was a bit breezy and we had the same airframe
  weight I'd even spot you a few points.

 Actually, I think the Allegro Lite did some of it first, but the Bubble
  Dancer is a combination of full pedal strength with very light weight,
  balsa construction, low moment of inertia, and refined aerodynamics. I
  don't recall seeing that before the Allegro Lite. The Bubble Dancer
  turns very quickly for a 3 meter. My impression was that it did this
  quicker than the aileron jobs. I hadn't seen anything quite like it before.
  Certainly not a 3 meter that you could full pedal launch and also be
  comfortable doing a couple of circles from a hand launch.

 Watching Mark launch the Allegro Lite was surreal. Like playing a 33 at
  45, or even 78, for those of you who remember vinyl. I don't know what
  the imitations fly like yet, though I hope to soon.
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 Fred,

 I agree with your opinion.  I read the threads and had to take a larger

 overview to what a benchmark actually means.

 In my opinion, Benchmark planes, means some plane to which other planes

 are compared to so that a noticeable advancement in performance,
 building, transport, and flying can be measured.  They should be unique

 and contribute unique characteristics.
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
  and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note
  that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only
  format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as
  Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format





   
 
 Be a better pen pal.
 Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how.  
 http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs

2007-11-30 Thread chris
Hi Mike,

First of all, I presented my opinions as to what is a benchmark, and
specifically stated my qualifications.  They can differ from the
thoughts of others, and on this exchange everyone had the ability to
express their views.  This is a philosophical discussion.

Are you just trying to give me a rough time for my opinions??  LOLOLOL

However, in regard to what my opinions are, I would love to express why
I chose the examples that I did, and group together others.

Let's take for example a few items.

First, most designers attempt to take the best feature of each plane and
try to merge it together into an overall better plane.  Is this a real
improvement per se?  Perhaps it is.  It is not in my benchmarks.

Second, I believe that changing just the airfoil does not necessarily
represent a benchmark.  Mark Drela has done exceptional work which I
admire, as have many other designers like JW, DP, many Europeans, among
others.  However, does using an airfoil and then modeling a new wing
planform constitute a benchmark?  My benchmarks were something that
produced a significant trend.  The planes themselves might not have
survived because their features were rapidly incorporated into other
models, but they were pioneers.  I do not think the Supras or Onyx, or
some of the others are just that much different (IMHO).

With that said, I look the difference or similarities between the
following planes:

The Photon and the Ava:  Hmmm, the AVA is just a scaled up Photon with a
little more wing taper, dihedral, but it is of the same construction. 
There are others from the Eastern European manufacturers that have
similar designs and structural features.

The Super Gee I and the Supra:  Hmmm, again the Supra is an enlarged
Super Gee.  It uses the same basic tailgroup, the same and beefier stab
mount, light weight construction, specific wing planforms and airfoils. 
They seem alike, but does size matter when they are used for two
separate events?

We see designers using features that fit their specific requirements. 
Obviously, this is quite evident when MacCready built a large Microfilm
indoor model because it performed the functions he required.  Consider
SpaceShip One, the shuttlecock wing feature is not much more than a
dethermalizer for freeflight planes used for over 50 years.  Thank
goodness our modeling experiences go to good uses.

But does that take away from the achievements of these great men?  No. 
What I see is that they took what they knew, added their take and came
up with a plane that performed the function they required.

In our sport, the F3B/F3J planes are taking minor variations and trying
to group them together.  The variations are not major.  The Sharons',
Supras, Schpotdorkers, Milleniums, and many other composite ships are
designed trying to optimize a specific task.  We are eventually going to
reach a point of diminishing returns.

However, why do new planes come out, if not for their new aerodynamics?

They come out routinely, in perhaps 9 month intervals, because of the
market.  People and pilots always want the latest and greatest, and pay
for that.

So IMHO, which I believe I can express, I am waiting for that
significant improvement to come out.

Is the improvement out there?  I really hope so.  It will become the
benchmark.

But is the Wright Flyer with wing warping any different than the dynamic
wing warping using electrochemical  induced composites that are
currently being explored?  The mechanics are different, but the
aerodyamincs is the same.

I wonder.

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs
 From: Mike Lachowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, November 29, 2007 5:41 pm
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Fred Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED],  RCSE soaring@airage.com

 Can you tell me what model the Supra is a refinement of?  Wright flyer?

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Fred,
 
  I agree with your opinion.  I read the threads and had to take a larger
  overview to what a benchmark actually means.
 
  In my opinion, Benchmark planes, means some plane to which other planes
  are compared to so that a noticeable advancement in performance,
  building, transport, and flying can be measured.  They should be unique
  and contribute unique characteristics.
 
  With that said, the Onyz, or Sharon, or Supra, in fact nearly 99% of the
  planes on the market currently are really just refinements to existing
  designs, and really are not improvements.
 
 

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe

[RCSE] Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs

2007-11-29 Thread chris
 design whose influences are seen in
the Bird of Time.

15) JW Wing:  Here is one of the first planes that permitted Dynamic
Soaring to take hold.  It permitted every DS pilot to home their skills
prior to the current developments.

OK, So you guys want to flame me for trying to set benchmarks. 
Personally, most of the planes we fly today are not too distinct, and
certainly do not have any real improvements that make them better than
any others.  I would venture to characterize today's planes as Mutts,
as in referring to the dog world.  They are not purebred for their
characteristics, and none of the planes really are a species that
contributes new and unique characteristics.   

Think back, what plane really had something unique for the sport? 
Those, in my opinion, are the benchmarks, even though they way now be by
the wayside.

Chris


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: Supra or Onyx JW??
 From: Fred Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, November 28, 2007 11:48 pm
 To: RCSE soaring@airage.com
 
 I've got to quickly get closer to my toilet...I think I'm going to 
 PUKE~
 JW?  Onyx?  Benchmarks  You gotta be kiddin' me.  PUKE
 damn it!
 Weav
 
 Pat McCleave wrote:
  Brian,
 
  That could be said of about any model Joe flys then.  I have watched him 
  successfully HLG several different models out.  One fairly heavy old beater 
  looking thing he was flying several years ago in Tulsa, I saw him launch 
  out several times in a row while shooting landing practice.  Basically that 
  anoits Joe as one of the Master Pilots and does not really say a whole lot 
  about the plane.  Don't get me wrong I think the Supra is one of best 
  planes out there but I do not necessarily consider it the bench mark for 
  all other designs.
 
  See Ya,
 
  Pat McCleave
  Wichita, KS
   Brian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

  Joe Wurts who could fly any model he chooses, winning the Nats, coming to 
  Tullahoma and hand launching into a sky out 95% of the time did not hurt 
  the Supras anointing any too much.. YUP..Gordy knows!! (grin) Brian
- Original Message - 
From: Joe Rodriguez 
To: soaring@airage.com 
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Re: Supra or Onyx JW??
 
 
What I find interesting why is the Supra considered the bench mark ? 
  who is the soaring lord who made this decree? 
 
The Supra is the most documented sailplane since it's release to the 
  public, with it's many issues depending what serial number you have. I can 
  not agree that fits a standard for bench mark status. 
 
 
 
j
 
 
- Original Message - 
  From: Gordysoar 
  To: soaring@airage.com 
  Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 12:03 PM
  Subject: [RCSE] Re: Supra or Onyx JW??
 
 
 
  -I went with the Onyx Jw because I thought it performed about like a
  Supra - Jack
 
  What I find interesting is that the Supra is considered the 'bench
  mark' and then there are the others...cheaper, but with some feature
  that makes them...better? worth more? almost as good for the cost?
 
  There are a lot of reasons to chose something other than the ships that
  are most proven and popluar, cost being one but in fact the cost is a
  few lawn mowings or driveway shovelings extra cash away from each
  other.
 
  The number one reason to get something other than the 'bench mark'
  ship?
  Because you want to try something else...it makes the hobby that much
  more fun for you.
 
  Second best reason...because IF you enter a contest flying the same
  ship as the majorityyou are left with one less excuse for not
  having done as well as they all did. Flying the same design as the
  group  can make Man On Man more about the pilot.  Maybe takes a little
  more guts :-)
 
  Third Reason...because you still believe that a certain model's foil or
  weight or span offers some advantage that will tip the time or landing
  points your way over the other poor saps stuck with that that 'bench
  mark' sailplane. 
 
 
  Gordy
 
 
  -- 
  Gordysoar
  
  
  Gordysoar's Profile: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=12801
  View this thread: 
  http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=772985
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send 
  subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note 
  that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format 
  with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and 
  AOL are generally NOT in text format
 
 
 
  --
 
 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8

RE: [RCSE] Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs

2007-11-29 Thread chris
Ryan,

Correct, The Uplink was Dick's plane.  Fiberglass wings, T-Tail, Tip
launched.  

The Upstart was a foamie by Dave Robelyn, I believe, manufactured for
Ace, I think.

Apologies to Dick.  If someone want to see a pictire of the UpLink Click
here:
http://www.spieltek.com/images/DB-Uplink10.jpg

Additionally, my list is not exclusive.  There are many more planes that
one can say contributed as benchmarks.

Obviously we can go on.

Thanks.

Chris 


  Original Message 
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Supra or Onyx JW, these are Me-Too Designs
 From: rdwoebke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, November 29, 2007 10:53 am
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 other HLGs, in my opinion, just refinements.
 
  8)  The Upstart:  The Upstart was the first DLG used in
 competition.  Tip
  launching was first pioneered by Dick Barker and Harold Locke, in
  Seattle, and Dick Barker used the launching method to be able to
 keep up
  with the overhand throws of Joe Wurts and the rest.  When EVERYONE
 else
  realized that they could use this method, most effectively by
 adding a
  gyro to their current planes, DLG became the only method for
 launching.
  Gyros are now gone by good DLG design and airfoiled tailgroups, but
  overall the UpStart was the benchmark.  It did not last long.
 Hey Chris,
 
 I think you meant Uplink, not upstart...

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Mountain Extreme Gliding - These Guys Take Big Risk

2007-11-28 Thread chris
I think their next goal is to DS at Parker with radar gun.  They can DS
all afternoon on one jump!


  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Mountain Etreme Gliding - These Gys Take Big Risk
 From: Scott [US], Millard C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, November 28, 2007 5:37 am
 To: soaring@airage.com

 Check out this video:

 http://www.biertijd.com/mediaplayer/?itemid=4262

 M. Scott

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


RE: [RCSE] Benchmark Sailplanes

2007-11-28 Thread chris
It flies like a Cirrus (in the 70's), and I still fly mine as it still
is my benchmark.

  Original Message 
 Subject: [RCSE] Benchmark Sailplanes
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, November 28, 2007 11:53 am
 To: soaring@airage.com
 
 When sitting around discussing a new or different sailplane design, often one 
 will hear phrases like,  It launches like a __.  Or, It ranges out 
 like a _.
 Or, It hangs like a _.  Or even, It lands like a _.
 
 Once a sailplane is mentioned in one of those scenarios, that sailplane 
 becomes a benchmark.
 
 Here is a possible list of benchmark sailplanes through the years:
 
 Sailaire
 Aquila
 Sagitta
 Falcon
 Thermal Eagle
 Icon
 Supra
 Super V
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
 unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
 unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
 Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
 text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Extending an Antenna

2007-11-24 Thread Chris Rose
I want to put one of my DLG's antenna down the wing, and was wondering
what wire I should use to accomplish this? Also, what wire can I use
to extend a JR600 receiver as well, which is in my 3M?

Thanks

Chris
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Mythbusters: Concrete Glider? We built Lead Sleds

2006-11-14 Thread chris
Concrete is light! We used to build "Lead Sleds" for the RCM
Trophy Races. We couldn't get the planes heavy enough for
racing.

That was in the days when Planes were raced liked NASCAR rather than
the chicken time trials where it is like slalom ski racing.

And yes, Gordy, I knew a Level V who broke his wrist trying to
stophis lead sled trophy racer, in fact, I beleive he was #1.

The only problems we had were getting the planes launched, never much
of a lift issue.

ChrisBTW Gordy "Real Men Know Thermals!"

 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] Mythbusters: Concrete Glider -- the result]From: Martin
Usher [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, November 13, 2006
9:01 pmTo: "soaring@airage.com"
soaring@airage.comThere is already a good bit of
chatter about it
already:http://community.discovery.com/eve/forums/a/frm/f/9401967776
(Ben Wilson)Interesting reference, disappointing threads.
Only one thread addedanything to the discussion
(IMO)http://community.discovery.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9401967776/m/8751951358To
me the 'concrete' bit was unimportant. The designs were 19th
century(Cayley?) so they were unlikely to perform that well even if
they weremade of appropriate materials.I'm pretty sure I
could get a slope glider to work with a concrete wingbut the big
question would be "Why?" -- both heavy and fragile (madethin to
keep the weight down using a brittle material -- not even
properconcrete (no aggregate)). Papier mache with a small amount of
cementbinder, OTOH, may be just the job..h... (don't
laugh --people used to make slope wings from foam cores and
Christmas wrappingpaper, apparently the result is very
strong).Martin UsherRCSE-List facilities provided
by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe"
requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] stuck on mandrel

2006-11-14 Thread chris
Tony:

When I make these type of ballast holders, I do the following:

I use 4 mil polyethylene painter's dropcloth. I cut a piece
that will make 2 or so wraps around the dowel. I thake separate
piece of plastic, lay out the Fiberglass, add resin, squeegee off the
excess, and carefull wrap it around the mandrel. Vac bag and let
cure. Afterwards I can plea the plasctic apart and you basically
have a rolled piece of fiberglass. Then I place this around
whatever I will be using as ballast, and CA closed, or even epoxy
closed. If you wrap plactic around the ballast, I find that the
plastic will permit the madrel to slip out. It all depends on how
much play you want around the ballast.

Good Luck
Chris

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
stuck on mandrelFrom: tony estep
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Tue, November 14, 2006 12:19
pmTo: soaring@airage.comCc: MVSA MVSA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



I needed a fiberglass ballast tube, 1/2" i.d. x 18"
long. I rolled some mylar around a 1/2" dowel and fiberglassed it -- it
came out looking great. However, I can't get the doggone thing off the
mylar. I can get the mylar off the dowel, but can't get any
farther. Next time, more wax on mylar. But can anybody tell me
if I can save this one, or do I have to throw it away and try
again?

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] stuck on mandrel

2006-11-14 Thread chris
Tony:

When I make these type of ballast holders, I do the following:

I use 4 mil polyethylene painter's dropcloth. I cut a piece
that will make 2 or so wraps around the dowel. I thake separate
piece of plastic, lay out the Fiberglass, add resin, squeegee off the
excess, and carefull wrap it around the mandrel. Vac bag and let
cure. Afterwards I can plea the plasctic apart and you basically
have a rolled piece of fiberglass. Then I place this around
whatever I will be using as ballast, and CA closed, or even epoxy
closed. If you wrap plactic around the ballast, I find that the
plastic will permit the madrel to slip out. It all depends on how
much play you want around the ballast.

Good Luck
Chris

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
stuck on mandrelFrom: tony estep
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Tue, November 14, 2006 12:19
pmTo: soaring@airage.comCc: MVSA MVSA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



I needed a fiberglass ballast tube, 1/2" i.d. x 18"
long. I rolled some mylar around a 1/2" dowel and fiberglassed it -- it
came out looking great. However, I can't get the doggone thing off the
mylar. I can get the mylar off the dowel, but can't get any
farther. Next time, more wax on mylar. But can anybody tell me
if I can save this one, or do I have to throw it away and try
again?

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] I Beat Gordy Buttons will be around a long time

2006-11-09 Thread chris
After all the hype I keep hearing regarding Gordy's attempts to get
Level 5, I have to provide him with a few insights:

1) You can have any number of contests, as long as they exceed
20 people, to make the points for the level. Thus, with all the
contests Gordy has attempted to win at, surely he has enough for all
levels in Total.

2) Gordy, you have to learn how to fly man to even get to
level 5! 

3) A careful choice of airplanes and design will get you much
farther than you are getting now, will all those wanting to get
Buttons!

4) You have to avoid the Shotgun and attrition approach to
getting the Contest win. You have to practice, practice,
practice. I would imagine you have had enough of that through all
the contest travels, but really now

5) You do know that it might be easier to set a F3* record
attempt, or perhaps an AMA record to get your win, they are
accepted. Try for one of those Maynard Hill records, just do it
with a glider!

6) With all those great planes on the market, getting a win
should be very easy! You can open your eyes while you land.

7) You might wait a few years more and then enter the "Senior"
class at Visalia or the like, when there will be more of us there, if
you think you can beat us with our canes.

8) Have you ever thought of the Rudder Elevator woody
class??? Wood is still stuff! Besides, you only have to
learn how to use the "right stick".

9) I think we should get a new T-shirt ready for Gordy that
says " I have been to 50 acceptable Level 5 qualifying contests,
and all I got is this lousy T-Shirt!"

10) Don't try DLG, it is way over your head.

11) Has anyone told him that his thermal, slope and cross
country flights expire after 50 contests?

Now I just wonder what those Buttons look like? Can someone out
there please post a closeup??? I have my own ideas for a
button!

Keep working, I know of many who have been to as many contests as
you!

Thermals,

Chris Adams

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
"I Beat Gordy - Tangerine 06" ButtonsIF"Huntsville,
Tullahom...From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, November 06, 2006
7:48 pmTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED], soaring@airage.com
Do I get a button if I beat Gordy in a round? or
does it have to be the whole contest?I sure would like to get
me one of them "I Beat Gordy Buttons" :-)Raed (Orlando
Buzzard) 

The price has gone up on those buttons, its got to be a 20+
man contest to qualify...I'm on the LSF5 trail :-)BUT you can feel
free to dance around me going "nah nah, nah-nah, nah!" should that
happen :-)So be warned, I'm not planning on making those buttons
easy to earn til I get those dang contest points out of the way
:)
See you in a couple of weeks!
Gordy
PS what are you bringing to
fly?

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] 2M Pulsar for sale

2006-10-28 Thread chris
2Meter Pulsar for Sale
Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(off exchange)
View plane and details at : http://www.spieltek.com/Pulsar2M.htm
Includes RTF Plane, 2 DS 60 servos in fuselage for R/E, 4 HS-55
servos in wings, (No RX or Battery)
$400 plus SH
Thanks for the bandwidth,

Chris Adams

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] lithium AA bateries

2006-10-27 Thread chris
I has to do with design of the cell chemistry, and obviously in
addition to manufacturing, current output, recharging, among other
things.

Take a look at the Li-Fe versus Li - ion chemistry at http://www.powerstream.com/BatteryFAQ.html

Chris

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
lithium AA bateriesFrom: "Robert Samuels"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, October 27, 2006 10:39
amTo: soaring@airage.comI just bought some lithium AA
bateries for use in my digital camera. They are 1.5 volt
cells. I don't understand how they can be 1.5 volts when
lithiums are 3 volts. Can anyone explain it to
me?Robert Samuels ... St.
Louis_Stay
in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp007001msn/direct/01/?href="">RCSE-List
facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] EverReady's Answer to the Lithium 1.5 V Cell Question

2006-10-27 Thread chris
In proper terms, the Lithium ion, Li+, is chelated by the "Organic"
compounds. Lithium disulfide and Lithium Sulfide are properly
termed "Inorganic" unless you are from a different planet with
alternate element based Life forms (LOL). As mentioned below, the
propylene carbonate, dioxane, and dimethoxyethane are really carriers
and do not themselves have a charge. In theory, these compounds
would not be electrolytes because they themselves are not
charged. They may be polar, and that characteristic permits them
to solubilize polar compunds as well as charged ions. The
electrodes, e.g. carbon or other related metals are just the location
where electrons are given up or accepted by the oxidation or reduction
reactions. It is the combinatin oxidation and reduction reaction that
gives a cell it's overall potential (voltage). In order for Lithium to
give up it's electrons the Fe (iron) must accept the electron.
Only when all the FeS2 is used up, or likewise all the Li available
releases the electrons will the cell reaction hit an equilibrium and
the battery be "Used Up". Rechargingis thereverse the
reaction, however due to the content of the cell components, reversal
may not be the reverse of the electricity generating process.
Batteries are made with the electrolytes as a "Paste" for a variety of
reasons, and ion diffusion in the paste is controlled by temperature
and hence time. That is why if you leave a battery for a while
after discharge it seems to come to life again, but not for long.
The solvents, dioxane, propylen carbonate and dimethoxyethane are used
for their low toxicity and solubility for dispersion, in water if you
are an environmental person.

BTW, water, which we say is an electrolyte is both a polar as well as
producesions. Within water as a solvent, water dissociates
into solublized (H2O solvent) H+ (protons, an acid) and OH- ions
(hydroxide base) to a large enough extent to conduct electricity.

If the reader will consult the URL for Li polymer descriptions, they
will see the the 3.0+ volt reduction potentials.

As an aside, what we really should be using is room temperature
molten salt batteries. Their elements and reactions are so
flamable that they are extremely dangerous. However, due to their
extremely high energy density, as well as their flamablilty and
explosive nature, they are used in relatively short duration electronic
applications, i. e. cruise missles. When they explode the battery
itself becomes part of the explosive and flamable destructive power. If
you think the Li polymer batteries we have explode, you should see these
electrolytes go up when exposed to air.

Grins!

Chris 


SNIP from my previous post URIThe Lithium-Iron
chemistry deserves a separate section because it is one of a handful of
lithium metal systems that have a 1.5 volt output (others are
lithium/lead bismuthate, lithium/bismuth trioxide, lithium/copper
oxide, and lithium/copper sulfide). Recently consumer cells that use
the Li/Fe have reached the market, including the Energizer. These have
advantage of having the same voltage as alkaline batteries with much
more energy storage capacity, so they are called "voltage compatible"
lithiums. They are not rechargeable. They have about 2.5 times the
capacity of an alkaline battery of the same size, but only under high
current discharge conditions (digital cameras, flashlights, motor
driven toys, etc.). For small currents they don't have any advantage.
Another advantage is the low self-discharge rate10 years storage
is quoted by the manufacturer. The discharge reactions are: 



Type
Reaction
Nominal Voltage
Range

FeS2 Version
2 FeS2 + 4 Li  Fe + 2Li2S
1.6 Volts
1.6-1.4 V

FeS Version
FeS + 2Li  Fe + Li2S
1.5 Volts
1.5-1.2 VBoth Iron sulfide and Iron
disulfide are used, the FeS2 is used in the Energizer. Electrolytes are
organic materials such as propylene carbonate, dioxolane and
dimethoxyelthane 

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
EverReady's Answer to the Lithium 1.5 V Cell QuestionFrom:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, October 27, 2006 2:05 pmTo:
soaring@airage.com
To confirm my earlier post that lithium was probably a component of
the electrolyte and not truly a controlling element of the
electrochemical reaction (which determines voltage), I contacted
EverReady's help line. They confirmed that the lithium in their
AA batteries was part of an "organic lithium based electrolyte,
specifically lithium disulfide". There you have it, it is part of
the electrolyte, not electrode, thus the conventional electrodes
determine the 1.5 V per cell, and the electrolyte just allows the
electrodes to last much longer than conventional (more corrosive)
electrolytes before it wears out. 

As a side note, I have used the lithium AA's in a scanner I use for
my XC vario. Those batteries clearly outlived anything else I have
put in the scanner, by an (estimated) 10 x lifetime of an
alkaline. Well worth t

RE: [RCSE] EverReady's Answer to the Lithium 1.5 V Cell Question

2006-10-27 Thread chris
John,

What?? Are you diabetic?

It's called "recharging", Sirius(ly)

;-)
Chris

 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] EverReady's Answer to the Lithium 1.5 V
CellQuestionFrom: John Erickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, October 27, 2006 3:31
pmTo: Chris Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED], Soaring List
soaring@airage.comCc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Chris and Jim,Will you two
please cover the Calvin Cycle next? I sat in on my
daughter'sAP Biology class and I swear out of 20 questions on a pre
test I got 1right. Humbling experience when your kids shoot
way ahead of your knowledgelevel.Of course she knows very
little about downwind turns with a Skeeter.JE--Erickson
ArchitectsJohn R. Erickson, AIA From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:44:09
-0700 To: soaring@airage.com Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [RCSE] EverReady's Answer to
the Lithium 1.5 V Cell Question  In proper terms, the
Lithium ion, Li+, is chelated by the "Organic" compounds.
Lithium disulfide and Lithium Sulfide are properly termed "Inorganic"
unless you are from a different planet with alternate element
based Life forms (LOL). As mentioned below, the propylene
carbonate, dioxane, and dimethoxyethane are really carriers and
do not themselves have a charge. In theory, these
compounds would not be electrolytes because they themselves are not
charged. They may be polar, and that characteristic permits
them to solubilize polar compunds as well as charged ions.
The electrodes, e.g. carbon or other related metals are
just the location where electrons are given up or accepted by
the oxidation or reduction reactions. It is the combinatin oxidation
and reduction reaction that gives a cell it's overall potential
(voltage). In order for Lithium to give up it's electrons the Fe
(iron) must accept the electron. Only when all the FeS2 is used
up, or likewise all the Li available releases the electrons
will the cell reaction hit an equilibrium and the battery be
"Used Up". Recharging is the reverse the reaction, however due
to the content of the cell components, reversal may not be the
reverse of the electricity generating process. Batteries are
made with the electrolytes as a "Paste" for a variety of
reasons, and ion diffusion in the paste is controlled by
temperature and hence time. That is why if you leave a battery
for a while after discharge it seems to come to life again, but
not for long. The solvents, dioxane, propylen carbonate and
dimethoxyethane are used for their low toxicity and solubility
for dispersion, in water if you are an environmental
person.  BTW, water, which we say is an electrolyte is
both a polar as well as produces ions. Within water as a
solvent, water dissociates into solublized (H2O solvent) H+
(protons, an acid) and OH- ions (hydroxide base) to a large
enough extent to conduct electricity.  If the
reader will consult the URL for Li polymer descriptions, they will
see the the 3.0+ volt reduction potentials.  As
an aside, what we really should be using is room temperature molten
salt batteries. Their elements and reactions are so
flamable that they are extremely dangerous. However, due
to their extremely high energy density, as well as their
flamablilty and explosive nature, they are used in relatively
short duration electronic applications, i. e. cruise missles.
When they explode the battery itself becomes part of the
explosive and flamable destructive power. If you think the Li
polymer batteries we have explode, you should see these
electrolytes go up when exposed to air.  Grins!
 ChrisSNIP from my previous post
URI  The Lithium-Iron chemistry deserves a separate
section because it is one of a handful of lithium metal systems
that have a 1.5 volt output (others are lithium/lead bismuthate,
lithium/bismuth trioxide, lithium/copper oxide, and
lithium/copper sulfide). Recently consumer cells that use the Li/Fe
have reached the market, including the Energizer. These have
advantage of having the same voltage as alkaline batteries with
much more energy storage capacity, so they are called "voltage
compatible" lithiums. They are not rechargeable. They have
about 2.5 times the capacity of an alkaline battery of the same
size, but only under high current discharge conditions (digital
cameras, flashlights, motor driven toys, etc.). For small
currents they don't have any advantage. Another advantage is
the low self-discharge rate10 years storage is quoted by
the manufacturer. The discharge reactions are:  Type
Reaction Nominal Voltage Range FeS2 Version 2 FeS2 + 4 Li
 Fe + 2Li2S 1.6 Volts 1.6-1.4 V FeS Version FeS +
2Li  Fe + Li2S 1.5 Volts 1.5-1.2 VBoth Iron sulfide
and Iron disulfide are used, the FeS2 is used in the Energizer.
Electrolytes are organic materials such as propylene carbonate,
dioxolane and dimethoxyelthane   
Original Message  Subject: [RCSE] EverReady's
Answer to the Lithium 1.5 V Cell Question From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, Oc

RE: [RCSE] Re: Blah Blah Blah

2006-10-21 Thread chris
Nah, They are blue. He is a quart (liter) low.

Chris

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
Re: Blah Blah BlahFrom: schrederman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Sat, October 21, 2006
8:13 amTo: soaring@airage.comAren't Gordy's eyes brown...
reportedly because he's full of somethingor another... but I heard
something other than BBQ.Someone finally got him to fly RES and
he seems to like it!Jack Womack--
schredermanschrederman's
Profile: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/member.php?u=13218View this
thread:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=585938RCSE-List
facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Stopwatch Recommendation

2006-10-17 Thread chris
Having been at the IHLGF 5 years, I took a specific look at all the
stopwatches as well as timing methodssince my original CD.

I have one of the Robotics, and unless you are always using all the
functions, the best function I have used is clear to wipe all the times
out of the Memory. Easily done in the "Heat of Battle".

As for ease of use, the Sieko (originally the Lorus) has been the
best all arouind watch. It switches between count down and count
up, and mimics the old non-digital stopwatches. I still like my
old 30 year old hand watch, you can switch between count up and count
down at a glance, i. e. no buttons! LOL

As for IHLGF or related DLG competions, the best set up I have seen
is with 3 stopwatches on the clipboard. The main one, countdown,
is set to 10 seconds longer than the event window. You start it
during the countdown to the start and it will give you the remaining
window time at a glance. This is great if you have a flight which
will end, or could, at the buzzer.

The second 2 watches alternate. This gives the timer full
control on recording of times, counting the number of flights, knowing
the longest flights, and knowing if you should take another launch.

When the pilot launches, the first watch is started. When he
lands, it stops, the timer switches to the next watch, and starts it on
the 1.5 second launch. The timer can now write down the time at
leasure, for knowing if you should launch again, clear it and have it
ready for the next relight. All this repeats.

If you have the watches velcro-ed or clipped to the clipboard, you
can remove them between rounds.

Also, contestants laminate a copy of the event order on the
clipboard. So this helps to remind you of what the next event,
round will be, if you do not look at the scorecards.

Go with the Seiko (lorus) and you will not be disappointed and have
to learn the workings of the Robotics each time. The KISS
priciple works well here. 

Someone want to by my Robotics
Chris Adams
LSF 348 LvL V (#8)
 Original Message
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Stopwatch RecommendationFrom:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Tue, October 17, 2006 10:46 amTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Soaring@airage.com

In a message dated 10/17/2006 12:08:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would you need lap time for TD
work?

Not for TD, but for HLG! A practiced HLG competitor can catch
and re-launch his plane in 1.5sec, the timer needs the lap recording
capability to keep up! Good Lift!

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Flaperon Programing for Encore-Type DLG With JR8103

2006-10-02 Thread chris
Hi All,

I am trying to set up a Flaperon DLG using a JR8103/R610. I
believe I can do it with this RX.

I am trygin to figure out if it is easest using the Sailplane
full house setup with the ailerons as flaperons in the mixes, or
if it is better to use the airplane Flaperon wingtype in the airplane
section?

I have read over the internet instructions for the setups, but still
am confused. 

Can someone provide me with assistance for what their setup is, if
possible?

Thanks.

Now I know why I like R/E so much and why I don't do video
games! LOL.

Chris Adams

Thanks to those who provided input for the full house ship. Got
one of those new fangled R720 freq detecting RXes. Still tryign to
set everything up. I often wonder how you keep track of the single
servo direction that seems to confuse everything.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] For Sale

2006-09-29 Thread Chris Hallquist

What is it that your selling a stylus? your message didnt state.


  Chris
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Need answer for JR610 versus R600 Programming for Flap Aileronmodel

2006-09-28 Thread chris
Help:

I need to know if I can program a aileron flap ship using a JR R610M
RX versus a JR R600 Rx.

I can split off the Battery/channel requirements, but need on know if
Aux2 can be programmed to another of the available channels. I
have a 8103. Is there a link to a reference for programming somone can
send me?

Otherwise I have to sweeze in an R600 into a very tight 2M ship
fuse.

Thanks in advance.

Chris

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Re: OT: Can anything be done with frosted headlight covers?

2006-09-22 Thread chris
Gentleman:

The simplest thing to try with in house stuff is a soft fine weave
cotton cloth and toothpaste. Use the paste to wet out the cloth,
don't add much water, if any, unless the paste dries as it does.

Many toothpastes have a very fine grit, whether is be silica base or
titanium dioxidepigment, and I use it all the time for polishing
crystals on watches (when plastic), and canopies. I also use
toothpast to remove the tarnish on silver necklaces. Just put the
closed necklace in the palm of your hand, add paste and rub.

All simple stuff learned from and old jewelr boss.

Chris

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
Re: OT: Can anything be done with "frosted"
headlightcovers?From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, September
22, 2006 8:49 amTo: Soaring@airage.com

Stan,

This topic came up recently on one of the car forums I frequent.
One guy had success using very fine wet/dry sandpaper (used wet), the
same stuff they use in auto body painting, progressively finer, and
finally polishing compound. The sandpaper is available in Pep Boys and
the like, and grit rating is in the thousands (don't rememberthe
exactvalues).Mine are etched from our desert sun so I was
going to try this soon, and I figure the worst that will happen is I
screw them up and have to replace with new ones anyway! There are
products available at the auto stores for polishing plastic headlight
lenses, but they are not aggressive enough to get rid of the
etching.

Just so Gordy doesn't blast me for a non-soaring post, I suppose
you can use this technique for getting rid of frosted canopies on your
scale sailplanes ;-)

The other Stan

In a message dated 09/21/2006 4:37:32 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
Soaring@airage.com writes:
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:18:03 -0500From:
Stan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Soaring Digest
soaring@airage.comSubject: OT: Can anything be done with
"frosted" headlight covers?Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]My headlights on 98 Audi A6
are almost completely frosted. Any help out
there?ThanksStan



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Need Apprx CG/Towhook Location for a Pulsar 2M

2006-09-19 Thread chris
To All,

I am looking for an approximate CG location (inches/mm from LE) and a
towhook location. If anyone can assist that has one I woudl
appreciate it.

thanks,
Chris


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] non soaring content

2006-09-13 Thread chris
Cool, nice 1/4 scale ship. I am very surpised the guy let his
friend fly the plane while he sat in it. That's courage!

Chris

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
non soaring contentFrom: Bill Johns
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Wed, September 13, 2006 5:24
pmTo: Soaring Yahoo Soaring@airage.comOK, it ain't
a sailplane. It's still
cute:http://flight.cz/cricri/vids/v2.wmvCheers,Bill---Out
beyond ideas of wrong doing and right doing there is a field. 
I'll meet you there. 
 
 
 
   
RumiBill JohnsColton, WARCSE-List
facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #8144

2006-08-22 Thread Chris Kuhn
 creature in the
 soaring world who wa=
 s one hundred percent liked by everyone who knew
 him. Sincere sympathi=
 es to Johnny -- we'll all miss Butch.=0D=0A=0D=0A 
 Tony Estep.=0D=0A=
 =0D=0A=0D=0A  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model
 Airplane 
=== message truncated ===


Tnx  73
CHRIS
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


[RCSE] Re David zucker

2006-08-09 Thread Chris Hallquist



Hey David ping me back.

  Chris
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] re: Rudder Stalls and Turns

2006-08-02 Thread chris
Blaine:

I can see this effect on a moderate sized glider where the plane has
inertia, however what happens when using a DLG?
I am trying to understand the observations we see when a light plane
is used. A DLG appears to be nearly at it's stall speed when
rudder deflection is added. Hence from a "Physical" view, my
plane appears to stall. I am using one of Watson's foam
tailgroups on my Photon I. 

When a rudder stalls due to AoA deflection, what would a pilot
see?Is there less rudder response? If the plane is moving
significantly, I can see how all the Rudder yaw/roll is overcome by the
KE. When slow the mass of the wings etc appears to enter into the
observations.

Additionally, with the cruciform tailsgroups in DLG versus the
standard rudder/E config of say the Supra, I expect that the twist
induced by the tail of the Supra versus the twist balance of the
cruciform rudder there is more yaw induced in the DLG.

Am I looking at this incorrectly?

Thanks,
Chris Adams

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
re: Rudder Stalls and TurnsFrom: Blaine Beron-Rawdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Wed, August 02, 2006 2:06 pmTo:
Soaring Soaring@airage.comCc: Mark Drela
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gents,It is worth being wrong by
two orders of magnitude when it draws Mark Drela into the
conversation!I stand corrected. Thanks a lot,
Mark.Blaine Beron-RawdonEnvision DesignSan Pedro,
CADate: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:56:05 -0400From: Mark Drela
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: soaring@airage.comSubject: [RCSE] re:
Rudder Stalls and TurnsMessage-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a tendency for R/E models to pitch up when a turn is
initiated due to gyroscopic precession.Yes. But
this precession effect is very very weak. In my simulationof
a BD being given a fast 30 degree rudder input, the nose pitches
upby only 0.03 degrees.Nevertheless, in this ruddering
maneuver of a r/e glider, there isindeed a sudden large AoA
increase of about 3 degrees (more than enoughto cause a "rudder
stall"). But the cause is simply due to the linearinertia of
the glider, not to precession. Imagine this sequenceduring a
rudder turn, with the rotation angles exaggeratedto show the
effect:1) Glider is flying level in a straight line.2)
Glider yaws to the right 45 degrees (while still moving along the
straight line)3) Glider rolls to the right 45 degrees
along its now-yawed fuselage axis (while still moving along
the straight line)You will see that the glider's belly now
faces the oncoming wind along theoriginal direction of
motion, which constitutes an Angle of Attack
increase.In reality, the glider's yaw, roll, and turn
motions will all blend togetherwith some lags between
them, but the effect to cause the AoA increasewill still be
there.RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.
Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned
off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Re: Rudder Stalls and turns.

2006-07-31 Thread chris
Hi Jay, 

I have been flying my Photon 1 in the IHLGF for 4 years. I have
a Watson tailgroup on it (Spyderfoam/FG) which is close to the type the
Photon II has. I use alot of rudder throwand use the rudder
for tight thermals, as well as using it for drag breaking and
stalling. You have to use the rudder in many ways, in order to
get down fast, especially close to the ground. Rudders may not
stall themselves but they DO STALL THE PLANE. You can go to the
Drela sites and read about how tail surfaces stall. Here are my
observation and use.

1) I use ALOT of rudder throw. My desire is to up end the
wing ASAP if I want to core a tight thermal. 
2) I use Exponential on my Rudder, mainly to create the
ability to put in minor changes when first moving the stick, and major
throws on the extremes.
3) If I need to use it, especially at high altitudes, I have my
dual rates set up to be 40-50% fo my normal throws. I use this
when I need to fly smoothly high, as well as letting some others fly
the plane.
4) Rudders do stall. However, if you are experincing
Rudder stalls from level flight, then your CG is back to far.
Basically, you need to increase your glide speed slightly, as you are
right at the point where any drag slows the entire wing down and it
stalls. Be aware, that your slowest glidespeed may not be your
best L/D speed. Often you need to add down elevator to speed the
plane up then initiate the turn.
5) When flying rudder/Elevator, you do need to add up elevator
in your turns. You will find that once you initiate a bank, only
the elevator is required. The rudder is then only used to keep
the plane in the bank when required, and level when it attempts to tuck
in tighter in the turn.
6) I use rudder as a Spoiler/Brake all the time. There
are 2 methods.
7) Method 1: If you oscillate your rudder fast, the plane
does not respond, BUT the rudder acts as drag and brakes the
airplane. It is like a swing/pendulum/harmonic thing. Try
it when you are close to the ground apparoaching for a catch.
Basically a rudder drag brake.
8) Method 2: If you move the rudders slowly, you can get
a wings oscillation set up. Big Throws make is so you can respond
to making the plane turn back fast. Doing this, you can
essentially induced a s-turn and after 3 turns, like right, left,
right, the wing tips will stall and you can getthe plane to drop 10
feet or so.
9) There are methods to do elevator stalls coming in. You
pull upp elevator up to a stall, let the nose drop, then pull up for a
stall, but just as it peaks give down to level the plane then pull full
up, which essentially mushes the wing in a flying level stall and the
plane drops vertically while still flying.
All these methods do require practice. Bill Watson often said
that for R/E ships 1 ft = 1 sec of flight time, so you can basically
gauge how high you need to be to make a time.
10) While most now do not do it, I like to fly a gyro on a poly
ship. I tune down the gyro so that the rudder does ge affected
when thermaling. Try to tune it down as low as possible as
required for the throw, but so it does not affect thermal turns.
11) My Rudders are fairly thick, and the LEs blunted. the
Drella sites will talk about airfoil deadband, as well as stalling.
12) As for the Rudder stick, are you right handed or left
handed. As a right handed person I have flown with R/E on the
right stick.This is like most.

I have been flying R/E HLGs for a very long time and basically those
who fly aileron ships never realize the handicaps R/E ships have.
Sometimes I ask a aileron flyer to try a R/E ship because it does
require a blend of R/E that shows a aileron pilot the need to add more
rudder in turns. I envy the aileron giys alot too, they fly their
planes well.

Good Luck,

Chris Adams
LSF 348 LvL 5 (#8)


 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
Re: Rudder Stalls and turns.From: "Jay Hunter"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, July 31, 2006 9:20 amTo:
RCSE soaring@airage.comRudder stalls this is
where I found the concept. In the building instructions of the
photon II there is mention of having too much deflection, and having
too much deflection may 'stall the rudder'.http://www.netmeister.net/%7Ejerry/bldgp2.htmLook
in the cg section of the instructions.The consensus seems to
be:1. No one has heard of a rudder stall2. A
rudder turn requires some banking other wise you will just
'slide'3. Most people who use RES ships use the rudder on the
right stick, not the left stick as I am doing at the
present.Jay
On 7/28/06, Jay
Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

I am trying to figure out if my rudder turns are accurate. I
think I am experienceing rudder stalls with my photon, from either too
much deflection or from holding the deflection too long. In
other word do I ever want the rudder to cause my plane to
roll?Can someone explain to me what a rudderstall is and how to
prevent it?Should all rudder turns remain flat?Also is a
roll a rudder stall of sorts?Thanks,
Jay

RCSE-List facilitie

[RCSE] Another set of Still more two meter thoughts

2006-07-31 Thread chris
Jim and All:

I appreciate and concur withthe comments that you made
regarding the challenges for 2M designers.

The Hand Launch Glider community has had this issue for over 10
years. With the development of the Discus Launch by Dick Barker,
a whole new set of design requirements came into play.

However, the 1.5 meter wingspan rule is the same.

For 2 Meters planes, there has been considerable development since
the original 2 Meter World Cup contests of the 70's-80's.

Having considered designing a 2M plane, there is one overriding
comment I must interject here, that is the launch system.

I flew my Flapped Photon DLG in Open Class in Sacramento for
the Spring Fling a couple of years ago. While I used their 6 volt
winch and retriever, I popped off on nearly every launch.
Additionally, I could only get a few hundred feet on the launch.
There were problems.

After a great suggestion by Jim Thomas, I walked the retriever slip
swivel/ring 3/4 of the way down the winch line toward the turn
around. This took about 5 minutes, but since no on else used the
winch, I could do this prior to each flight. All launches after
that used the swivel positon on the line as the focal point of the
winch system, as if it were the turn around.

The basic problems as you can seeare 3-fold: 
1) The lighter, smaller, 2M meters have to be strong enough to
use the SAME winches and retrievers as the 3.7 meters ships. 
2) The same 2 Meters have to haul up ALL the weight of the
winch line. The line is especially heavy considering the big
ships need stronger winch lines and the retrievers need stronger lines
just to return the higher drag lines over the ground.
3) The 2Meters have to be over-designed to take the
stresses.

In effect, you are not designing for aerodynamic performance, rather
you are designing for the winch. Some may say this is the same,
but it is not. Over the years, having been involved with the high
launch/zoom controversies, it really does no matter whether the design
is aerodynamically good, all that matters is that the plane can survive
the zoom and haul up the line and still fly average. Oh how
reminencent of the Old F3B and 2 Meter World cup days. Obviously,
a 2 Meter can be accelerated to a higher speed because of it's size and
weight, this translates to 600-700 ft launches. With a sink rate
of 1.3 ft/sec (which is alot compared to a DLG which is well below 1
ft/sec), a pilot should be able to stay up in normal conditions over 8
minutes, well above most duration contests. You might think this
simplistic, but round numbers appear within the range. 

When they provide a winch system that removes the handicap, perhaps
more 2 Meter designers may emerge. Right now, the heavier
composites have to be left to the manufacturers.

This is also reminds me of the woody classes at Visalia, same things
are in effect. So forget the 2 meter, go to the bigger
ships. 

When there is just a 2 meter contest of note, akind to the
IHLGF/ECHLGF/Polecat challenge, 2 M development might florish.

Thermals,
Chris Adams
LSF 348 Lvl 5 (#8)




 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
Still more two meter thoughtsFrom: "Jim Deck"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, July 31, 2006 1:22
pmTo: "RCSE" soaring@airage.comOK, so two R/C
sailplane designers sit down to create the next world beater, one a
two meter, the other an unlimited. At some point in time, the
unlimited designer can simply say, "I'll increase the span."
(Perhaps DP did this with his "Insanity") while the two meter
designer does not have this luxury. Thus the two meter class
sailplane is a challenge at every stage: design,
construction, and flying. These challenges continue, IMHO, to
make two meter a viable class.   Jim
Deck RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.
Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned
off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] news story

2006-07-31 Thread chris
It's not that Gordy did not see it, it is just that he doesn't want
to admit that he forgot to put his name and AMA numberon the
plane so it could be returned to him after sucha long time.
Please recall that back then his Max server had square output gears and
he he had to grease them up with mammoth oil. You should see his
stone toolbox and lightning rod.

Chris

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
news storyFrom: Dana Flemming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, July 31, 2006 6:08
pmTo: soaring soaring@airage.com
it was great to see everyone at the NATS again, even if it was just
for one day.

a few weeks ago, i posted a fictional news story of archaeologists
finding a plane in the ice of the Himalayas. I just found out at
the NATS that Gordy never saw it.

Does anyone still have it in an old folder somewhere?
Thanks
DanaFlemming

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] RE: Visalia Woody Class

2006-07-24 Thread chris


 Original Message Subject: RE:
Visalia Woody ClassFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, July 24,
2006 11:33 amTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Kevin,

Sorry to take so long to reply. The reponses I received from
Phil Hill, the CD, aregiven below. Basically it is an RES
class without any molded stuff. 

Personally: This is a STUPID new class. It is a crutch
for those who can't buy Composite RES ships, as still rules out every
wood ship that ever had flaps/ailerons in nostalgia class.If you
look at Question 6, you can see that most do not know anything about
nostalgia/wood ships.Question 12 indicates thata concensus
is that ALL oldnostalgia ships ONLYWERE
RES. Not So.

I know I will be on the "HIT list" once this reply is received by
all, but it no different than those who complain that molded RES class
ships are taking over. It might have been better to just place
all molded ships greater than 2M in open class. I have flown my
Graupner Cirrus for more than 5 years at Visalia, both in Open as well
as RES, so I am well aware of the issues. Additionally, the
Cirrus is a straight winged, dihedral RES ship, so I also have wondered
whether is could even compete in the "Bent Wing" RES class too.
Straight wings do not equal bent wing polys. You never
know.

If the "Woody" Class was open for designs, I was looking into
building a very large, flapped RES ship. Now I will probably just
build a wood ship, and fly it in OPEN. What the heck, if I can do
well in that class with a wood ship designed for floating and landing,
it may open a few eyes.

Good Luck with your new designs.

Thermals,

Chris AdamsLSF 348 LvL 5 (#8)



SNIP
See the answer at the end of each question. The Woody class is
for the guy whowants to fly like it was before the hi-tech crap
ruined the affordablesailplane. I retained the OPEN RES for those
who want to fly RES but still throwlots of bucks at it. I think you
can figure it out as you go. Just think back tothe early eighties
type of sailplane and you will be OK. I will be the
finaljudge.
Phil Can you please give us some guidelines for
the Woody Class?  1) No wood sheeted foam wings?
YES 2) Built-up wings with CF spar
reinforcments only? YES 3) Can you CF reinforce a Balsa
Leading and Trailing Edge? NO 4) Wing
ribs can't be CF capped? NO 5) Are all
Czech-type designed planes, e. g. Ava's, Ravins, Photons, not 
permitted in the class? CORRECT 6) Can
you fly a woody Todi, Maestro? Do they meet the
requirements? 7) All functions permitted?
RES ONLY 8) Fuselages can be CF, FG, Pod
and Boom, etc? YES 9) R/E's must be built up
and of wood? Same types of construction as
wings?YES 10) Is there some kind of
Builder of the model rule? I. E. Can perkins buy  his ARF
ship from Hobby lobby? As long as it meets the woody
calssificationit's OK 11) Who is going to
measure/police the models? The biggest assholes at CVRC,ME 
Claude Turner 12) What other limitations? No water
ballast?? Come on lets get real herethis is for the guy who
just wants to compete like it used to be. If you wantthis type of
crap fly RES OPEN  Are you trying to get
people to once again design and build wood planes?YES,Is it not
obvious.  Inquiring minds want to know!
 Thanks, Chris Adams LSF 348 LvL 5 (#8)



 Original Message ----Subject: Re:
VisaliaFrom: "Chris Adams" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date:
Mon, July 24, 2006 11:09 amTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]From:
"Kevin Webb" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "Chris Adams"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: VisaliaDate:
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:21:41
-0700Chris:Did you ever get an answer
from Phil? Also, do you know if one flies multiple events
if they can use different frequencies? I emailed Phil but
haven't got an answer.Kevin WebbLSVF
V- Original Message - From: "Chris Adams"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 4:17
PMSubject: Re:
VisaliaPhil,Can you
please give us some guidelines for the Woody
Class?1) No wood sheeted foam
wings?2) Built-up wings with CF spar reinforcments
only?3) Can you CF reinforce a Balsa Leading and
Trailing Edge?4) Wing ribs can't be CF
capped?5) Are all Czech-type designed planes, e. g.
Ava's, Ravins, Photons, not permitted in the
class?6) Can you fly a woody Todi,
Maestro?7) All functions permitted?8)
Fuselages can be CF, FG, Pod and Boom, etc?9) R/E's
must be built up and of wood? Same types of construction as
wings?10) Is there some kind of Builder
of the model rule? I. E. Can perkins buy his ARF ship
from Hobby lobby?11) Who is going to measure/police
the models?12) What other limitations? No water
ballast??Are you trying to get people to once
again design and build wood p

RE: [RCSE] First Sailplane

2006-06-30 Thread chris
My first R/C saiplane was Dave Robelen's Kestral rudder-only plane
which I beleive was in Model Airplane News, approx 1970. The
sheeted hollow core wing had no spars, T-Tail, 6 ft, tissue doped over
balsa. I used a Controlaire Galloping ghost TX on 27.145, single
channel RX with transistor switching powering a Adams Actuator (no
relation). Still have the entire RC system. Wish I could
find the schematics for the switching unit.

That was followed by Mark Smith's Windward with a Kraft KP3C ratio
(still have it too), and then a Graupner Cirrus. The Cirrus
served me well enough all the way through my LSF 5 Slope flight (4 C
alkalines near the CG). I have been flying a more "robust" Cirrus
(my second, but I still have the original at 35 years) for 5 years and
it is going STRONG.

If you guys have been to Visalia the last 4-5 years, you will have
seen the Yellow Bird appearing to nearly fold the wings on the current
launch winches, then flatten the wings on a so-call zoom.
Everyone generally yells at me not to fold the wings! After 30
years, I think I know how to fly it by now. Besides, it is
probably the oldest flying plane there both in actual age as well as
design. Working on molds to reproduce the fuse, and have the
clear canopy pulled. It doesn't do well in the wind, but it sure
outclimbs most current ships. 

As for Gordy and HLG, I have my original 66" HLG I flew in Dave
Thronburg's 1979 HLG contest. Guys, if I show up with it at
anyDLG contest, can I get it "grandfathered" in as an exception
to fly it as having been a pioneer in HLG contests? It originally
had a Themral sensor in it too!

Chris Adams
LSF 348 Lvl 5 (#8)

 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] First SailplaneFrom: Fritz Bien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Fri, June 30, 2006 12:04 pmTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], soaring@airage.comAt 01:16 PM 6/30/2006,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Thornburg's (all sheet balsa) Zephyr (initially with
one-channel escapement) circa 1968. Any other older-than-dirt
contemporaries still alive out there? Good
Lift!Hi Skip, I'm still flying a Graupner
Clou, though I no longer use my Kraft Custom reed set. My
Ecktronics Nomad needs new tissue, and its Kraft K3VK has long given up
the (galloping) ghost. -Fritz 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] VINDACATOR AIL. DIFF.

2006-03-13 Thread Chris Hallquist
Ive got 2 slopers I've got questions about aileron differenial.One is a 
60 Vindacator and a Northeast Sailplane Sparrowhawk 2m do the use the 
same amount of differential? Ive just got a new Stylus and am trying to 
set up all my palne in it. Also I've got a Art Hobby Hybrid DL hand 
launch same question. 


 Chris Hallquist
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Computer Guided Thermaling

2006-01-19 Thread chris
Thermal sensors in HLG, you are 30 years t late my friend!
I had one inmy 66" HLG in the plane I used in Dave Thornburg's
HLG contest back in the 70's. The thermal sensor responded like a
bouncing Mozart tune. Found that the wingtips showed more than the
mechanical assistance. All thermal sensors do is give you a false
sense of thermal security. For TD , very bad. However at
60-70 MPH going cross country, at 2500-3000 feet, that is a different
story.

So guys, keep flying with them and you will soon learn that they
really help you stay in sink.

That reminds me of Ken Bates' sink detector. He put a stuff rat
in his wing, covered it with monokote. When the plane flies
through sink the rat jumps out and you know you should leave the
area. Because we all know a Rat always leaves a sinking ship!

Chris,
Lsf348 Lvl 5 #8
 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] Computer Guided ThermalingFrom: Daryl Perkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu, January 19, 2006 10:44 pmTo:
"James V. Bacus" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
soaring@airage.comI am lucky to get out and soar the
old fashioned waywhen I can.The old fashioned way?
With a picolario stuck in yourear? I'm sorry... but i don't
remember that from theold daysfunny thing is... the
best I've ever seen Jim fly wasat this past Nats, F3J when
nothing was stuck inhis earPlease people... since it's
allowed in AMAcompetition... PLEASE use your picolarios
sinceAMA allows it... and cuz you guys forget to fly themodel
while you're intently listening for lift;-)I'm sorry... but
I feel the things should bedisallowed in competition... Should we
use them inhand launch
too?D__Do
You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around http://mail.yahoo.com RCSE-List facilities
provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


FW: [RCSE] hlg bagging question

2005-12-21 Thread Chris Newcomb

If you do it all as one piece you only need to do it once.

Chris



From: Douglas, Brent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] hlg bagging question
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:59:26 -0500

Just a quickie - say you're doing an aileron HLG wing, no dihedral (or
minimal) Question is, do you bag it as one piece, or would you bag
left and right halves to join later?

I could see arguments for both, but I'm just looking for the logic I'm
overlooking.

Thanks and Happy Holidays,
Brent



_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Off Topic - Voice Recognition s/w

2005-12-20 Thread Chris Adams

My lawyer uses Dragon for the prep of documents.  Seems to to well.
Chris




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 1-Soaring List soaring@airage.com, 1-IMAC [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
1-E Zone [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1-GSAL [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: [RCSE] Off Topic - Voice Recognition s/w
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:48:44 -0700

Curious whether anyone has enough experience to recommend a package. Trying 
to

help a modeler who has some mobility issues.

Simon Van Leeuwen
PnP Systems - The E-Harness of Choice
Radius Systems
Cogito Ergo Zoom

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that 
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with 
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL 
are generally NOT in text format



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] soaring stuff

2005-12-08 Thread Chris Hallquist

Hey thanks for the heads up about this site.

I.Ive been flying gliders my whole life I started with a reed set when 
I was in High School. Now i'am flying with a Micro pro 8000 which by the 
way Iam having problems with. it starting glitching the servos, and now 
it says there is no Ram installed.? If any body Knows about this let me 
know.
I'am presently building a hand launch glider from Art hobby called the 
hybrid DL. I have a few others that I've flown Quite a bit the 
saguitta,vindicator,gentle lady, sparrow hawk a couple of combat foamies 
etc. The ones I like best are the slope gliders the faster the Better. I 
live in California central coast and fly on a Hill facing the ocean so 
we get a lot of lift on a good day coming off the water.The hang gliders 
also fly on this hill so the air space sometimes can get crowded.I'am 
Probably going to be in the market for a computer Radio neg shift or a 
stylus so if anybody has anything used give me a Shout.



Chris
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] soaring

2005-12-03 Thread Chris Hallquist

well I subscribed to this list now what happens?


Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Subject: RC and airports

2005-10-11 Thread chris
Daryl,

I totally understand your position and the positions all have taken
with regard to full size aircraft. We all need to be more aware,
and if possible, communicate these items to our club members and on,
eventually getting to pilots out there who are not easily reached
through standard methods. Reminds me of the "Six
Degrees of Kevin Bacon".

I would also like to add one note for you not to get too upset with
the pilot standing in line behind you on the flight line when you break
the 250 pound test winchlines with your huge Insanity 3.7 and it comes
screaming back over our heads. The next time the line breaks I
might expect the CD (or pilot/competitor) to say, hey dude, we provide
perfectly good winches, which you take beyond expectations, so fly it
out.

There are always sides to take, some more dangerous and expensive,
and we all must be aware.

Chris
 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] Subject: RC and airportsFrom: Daryl Perkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Tue, October 11, 2005 2:03 pmTo:
soaring@airage.comI'm sorry people. I didn't mean to stir up
this much[EMAIL PROTECTED] When it happened, I really didn't think much
ofit. Just a flash of a toy airplane, "damn that
wasclose...what the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that doing there?" and Icontinued
with my 25 degree bank base to final turn.Ya seeI was kinda
busy at the time. I didn't getpissed until after... I don't
know how close that hill is to the end of therunway 25R. At 120 kts,
it sure seems pretty close.The first time I went in there, my
thought was, "Whatan odd place to put a hill..." It is EXACTLY
where Iwould normally turn base. Ya see, I have just
replaced my windshield at 12K, anda new engine at 70K. I doubt our
infamous Zagi pilothas insurance that will cover stupidity, or
mywrongful but somewhat pleasing death (for some ofyou)...
Or... if he'd even be there when I returned tokick his a@@...
;-)I was just sending a note to ask some of us to use
ourheads. Take care and please be
smart...D__
Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it
free.http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/RCSE-List facilities
provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Subject: RC and airports

2005-10-11 Thread chris
Oh, yes, My favorite saying is from Einstein

There are two things that are infinite, the Universe and Human
Stupidity. I am unsure about the Universe.

C

 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] Subject: RC and airportsFrom: "Randy Bullard"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Tue, October 11, 2005 10:43
pmTo: soaring@airage.com I haven't seen foam
wings collide with aircraft but I've seen them hit  other
vehicles and they don't seem to do noticeable damage.And how
many of those vehicles were doing 120kts or more? Because of their
construction and speed, planes are tremendously more vulnerable to
strike damage than any ground based "vehicle."The
comparison with birds is ridicules. Birds don't carry lead ballast and
nose weight. Lead, you know, the stuff bullets are made out of.
Birds are also not under human control and don't understand planes.
Foam planes are suppose to be in control of a thinking human.
Obviously some are not."Over-reaction." Ok Martin. Let somebody
put your life in danger and see how you
over-react.RandyRCSE-List facilities provided by Model
Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned
off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] DLG contest at Visalia

2005-10-03 Thread chris
Gordy,

Having run the DLG contest at Visalia, I want to correct you on a few
items:

1) It is not "tradition" to run an all up last down
event. Having run this contest before, the CD can run
anything. I have seen speed, laps, limbo, and now the one I
did.

2) The Blaster while being popular wasNOT anywhere close
to be 90% of the planes flown. Not even close. I take
exception to the comment you make as itsound more advertsing than
anything else. Please be truthful.

I have found that the choice of the event is related to the KISS
principle. Hence putting in a manuever which could disrupt the
flat glides of an all up last down flight was the attempt.

Personally, when we were practicing on Friday night we were getting 2
loops and times of 1 minute 6 seconds dead air. Clearly in the
first round where one loop was done I knew that two loops could more
easily be done with some of the ships.

As you noticed, we increased the loop numbers as the better and
better pilots moved to the top. This should be the case because
all most all up last down contests generally are won by the highest
launching pilot. In this case, conservation of energy and
smoothness of loops added just one more factor. BTW, at the end
if both pilots had not done 3 loops, there would have been another
flyoff flight.

Personally, the 4 loops at 15 seconds, then wait 10 seconds and fly 3
more loops was a bit nervey. And in all, it said if you want to
win you will not chicken out and not do a loop. 

For those of you who are interested, the rounds went 1 loop at 15
seconds and firts two down elimiated. All flight had to end back
on the grass, or the pilots was out, no matter when the plane
landed. The rounds continued with 2 loops at 15 seconds, then 3
loops at 15 seconds, then 2 loops at 15 seconds followed by 2 loops at
30 seconds. Then we did 3 loops at 15 and 2 loops at 30
seconds. The eventual end, with 2 pilots going at it was 4 loops
at 15, then 3 loops at 10 seconds after the completion of the 4 loops,
together.

I had anticipated a few more midairs, when actually there were none
during the contest.

So it was, simple, not scorecards required, everyone, I beleive,
laughed and had fun, and in the end we had some really great
flying.

Thanks to all who participated.

Chris Adams

 Original Message Subject: [RCSE]
"Visalia...Pikes and Sharons, and well...Pikes andSharons"From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Sat, October 01, 2005 9:52 pmTo: Soaring@airage.com

snip

Tradition dictates an all up last down DHLG contest(something
I have been officially banned from since I seldom get enough time per
toss to register on a stop watch and the rest of the pilots get
embarrassed!). In the end it was JW and one other. I would
say that 90% of the DLGs were Kennedy Composite Blasters, including
JWs. 

The final launch put the other guy's plane slightly higher than
JWs. But this year they threw in a hookon a cue of an air
horn, a loop had to be made...the last flight had 4 in a row after a
couple of two's I think...both planes were together, but JW was
slightly lower. JW is the king of energy and after the 4 loop he
had about 20' more than the other, which sealed the fate...and left JW
with plenty of time and altitude to do a style behind the back
catch.
snip

Gordy

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] RE:Fall Fest Requencies? Larry Taylor - CVRC

2005-09-16 Thread chris
Hey Guys, You are vicious! It's like a feeding
frenzie of sharks in a bloodbath!

To let you know, the question was simple and quite fair. I do
not envy the job Larry is doing, no one ever realizes the efforts and
the thankless job. I did it for a LSF tournament and back
then there were no computers to use like nowadays.

However, I would like to know if my registration had been
received. A few years back I sent it in and it never got to Larry
until 2 months AFTER the contest. So when it sounded like we would
know sometime mid-late August, that is nice. I followed the
comments here about two weeks ago, when someone asked then, and I
waited. So now at 2 weeksbeforeit would be nice to
know if I should cancel my reservations or just risk it to come.


And yes, one year I showed up and was asked to change by the CD the
night before. Luckily, I was able to do so.

So I do not think I was asking too much, I was just calmly
asking.

With people entering 2 or 3 classes when one was advertised is OK, I
don't blame the contest officials for adding people as it helps the
overall coffers, but does this hold up the notice? Are the second
and third classes an issue with scheduling?Just wondering.

Chris Adams

 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] RE:Fall Fest Requencies? Larry Taylor - CVRCFrom:
George Gillburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu, September
15, 2005 7:02 pmTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
soaring@airage.comAt 05:32 PM 9/15/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:BTW, Has anyone know of the frequencies we are
on??It's 2 weeks away, and I don't want to be changing
them in the hotel before the
meet.thanks,ChrisAs I
understand it, Larry is having to do all the data entry himself to
get the entry info ready for flight group assignment.  The flight
groups are assigned by two volunteers from the SSJSS who do it so
all the pilots are separated from their timers. As soon as we
get the info, we'll get it sorted out and back to Larry. If
they had cut off the entries on August 1 like they used to do, this
would all be done by now.RCSE-List facilities provided by
Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned
off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] T/D flying for $$$$$

2005-09-16 Thread chris
Maybe, but we took home all the rest of the hardware, and did so several
times
 Original Message Subject: RE:
[RCSE] T/D flying for $From: Chuck Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu, September 15, 2005 6:54
pmTo: soaring@airage.comAt 08:06 PM 9/15/2005, you
wrote:Don't give up on the West!Long ago, in
1974, the East coast complained that no-one from the West Coast
came to the Soar Nats in Chicago.So in 1974, we had a
contingent from the San Fernando Valley Silent Flyers(in LA)
and the area, make the pilgramage.We got into alot of
trouble when the Trophy display table items were moved to our
banquet table in mass.So, I don't give up on
anybody.Chris AdamsYes but I beat most of the
west coast fliers that year with a first in standard class
precision duration and 8th overall.Chuck Anderson RCSE-List
facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] RE:Fall Fest Requencies? Larry Taylor - CVRC

2005-09-15 Thread chris
BTW, Has anyone know of the frequencies we are on?? 

It's 2 weeks away, and I don't want to be changing them in the hotel
before the meet.

thanks,

Chris

 Original Message Subject:
[RCSE] Larry Taylor - CVRCFrom: Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu, September 15, 2005 4:02
pmTo: soaring@airage.com
Larry - please ping me. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dan

__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around http://mail.yahoo.com 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] travel boxes

2005-09-15 Thread chris
As a suggestion, go to Home Depot, or local Hardware store, and get
one of those Cardboard Cement post pouring tubes.

Fairly inexpensive, and all you have to do is make sure the diameter
fits the wing chord or tailfin, and you can cut some plywood ends and
screw them in as inserts. Kinda a one use item, but
might work. Mark Smith , and thatis along time ago, used
stovepipe exhausts to do the same thing for his old windfrees.

BTW, I use the tubes in my 4-runner to side my wings and fuses
in when I am on the road. Cheap, and you can pile stuff on top
while still not crushing the plane parts.

Chris
 Original Message Subject:
[RCSE] travel boxesFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu, September
15, 2005 5:15 pmTo: Soaring@airage.com

I am going to fly to cape cod for business but somehow i want to
take a sloper with me.

What works on airplanes? Some mag article wrote that a local boxes
would do it cheap. 
Wrongs, not for a 2 meter sailplane. They just dont do it after 15
calls made.One firm in chicago would do it for about $50 becasue they
have a cadcam system to cut the cardboard.

Im not looking for alum cases yet. The skiboard carriers are
expensive. 

Any ideas helpful

Dr Bill Snow
Cleveland Ohio

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] T/D flying for $$$$$

2005-09-15 Thread chris
Don't give up on the West!

Long ago, in 1974, the East coast complained that no-one from the
West Coast came to the Soar Nats in Chicago.

So in 1974, we had a contingent from the San Fernando Valley Silent
Flyers(in LA) and the area, make the pilgramage.

We got into alot of trouble when the Trophy display table items were
moved to our banquet table in mass.

So, I don't give up on anybody.

Chris Adams



 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] T/D flying for $From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu,
September 15, 2005 3:24 pmTo: soaring@airage.comIn a
message dated 9/15/2005 4:13:14 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:The EAST is LEAST (likely to
lose!) I'll see your crummy $20 and bump to $50!
Kiesling, Lachowski, Glaab, pack your bags! (Gordy will be
snuck in to make smoke  other distractions) Good
Lift!RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.
Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned
off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Retro winch

2005-09-12 Thread chris
Jim,

It's the "Darwin Award" equivalent for true F3B and F3J pilots in
Europe. 

The "Gorilla" and Flywheel winches were descendants. Somehow,
someone made it through their first launch.

Chris

 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] Retro winchFrom: "James V. Bacus"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Mon, September 12, 2005 4:44
pmTo: soaring@airage.comWhere's the pedal?
8-)At 06:38 PM 9/12/2005, S Meyer
wrote:That's great! ROTFLAt 10:07 AM
9/12/2005, Arne Ansper
wrote:http://nakotne.com/e107_plugins/kig_menu/index.php?view=imageimageId=795The
engine is from old Russian chainsaw "Druzhba"
(Friendship).regards,ArneJimDowners
Grove, ILMember of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JRAMA 592537
 LSF 7560 Level IV  R/C Soaring blog at
www.jimbacus.netRCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane
News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned
off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are
generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


FW: [RCSE] Tripping modern airfoils, and why do flaps and spoilers do what they do?

2005-09-11 Thread Chris Newcomb
Let me start a Jihad here. I have experienced what tripping an airfoil can 
do on the two best planes I have ever had and beleive in tripping. I have 
seen other people acting like it is the best thing since sliced bread after 
checking it out. It turbulates the air so there is less seperation thereby 
reducing drag. My DLG's launch higher and have less tendancy to tip stall.


Now, people who think I have chasing Squirrels in my brain are goint to say 
things like, I checked it out on X-Foil and it will not work, period What 
I would ask of them is how many positions, thicknesses, and lengths did you 
evaluate? See how hard it gets! Plus, I would propose that no two wings, 
even from the best craftsman are identical, especially if they are bagged.


You need to fiddle with it and don't expext positive results on your first 
try.


Try it, you will like it if you give it a little time.



From: Scott and Jennifer Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] Tripping modern airfoils, and why do flaps and spoilers do 
what they do?

Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:52:39 -0700

Bob Dodgson tripped his E214-equipped wings to achieve better
performance.  I'm not aware of any other sailplane designers who
recommend this.  Does anyone today recommend this as a way to improve
airfoil performance?  Was it ever a legitimate idea in the first place?
If it's something that actually works, what kinds of airfoils benefit
most from it?

Spoilers reduce lift and pitch the nose down; flaps increase lift and
pitch the nose up.  This we all know.  What I don't understand is why
the nose pitches the way it does.  Does the center of gravity somehow
shift?  Why doesn't the nose maintain the attitude it had before the
flaps or spoilers were activated?

Scott Martin
Chandler, Ariz.



_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Warning to all LSF Level II and above

2005-09-08 Thread chris
Don't worry, he can't sit still for 8 hours, nor chew gum and thermal
for the GR at the same time!

Chris Adams
 Original Message Subject: Re:
[RCSE] Warning to all LSF Level II and aboveFrom: "Ed Berris"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Thu, September 08, 2005 2:40
pmTo: "Jim Deck" [EMAIL PROTECTED], "RCSE"
soaring@airage.comGood Lord! If Gordy achieves
his level 5 we'll never hear the end of it.If you think he's hard
to live with now just wait until he acomplishes allthe tasks of
this demanding challenge. I think I'll be able to hear
himbragging all the way to Minneapolis.I've got to leave
now to get sound proofing supplies for my house. Maybe ifI
work hard I'll be able to seal out all the noise that I know will
follow.Oh ya, one more thing. GOOD LUCK,
GORDY.Ed- Original Message - From: "Jim Deck"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "RCSE"
soaring@airage.comSent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:14
PMSubject: [RCSE] Warning to all LSF Level II and
above   Attention all LSF Level II through
V:   I have just processed Mr. Gordy Stahl's Level
IV voucher and his LevelV voucher is in the mail. As
a result, you may find yourself approached by this gentleman
and perhaps invited to join him for some soaring.
Bewarned that he only wants you to stand by for two
hours while he completes the thermal task. Be really
suspicious if he invites you slope soaring as he will expect
you to stand by for 8 hours while he completes the
slopetask!!   Good luck to you, Gordy.
Jim DeckLSF
Secretary RCSE-List facilities provided by Model
Airplane News. Send "subscribe"and "unsubscribe" requests to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note thatsubscribe and
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format withMIME
turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and
AOLare generally NOT in text formatRCSE-List
facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note
that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format
with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as
Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format 

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


[RCSE] digest

2005-09-08 Thread Chris Kuhn
Anybody,  how do I get my RCSE mail into digest form? 
TNX Chris

Tnx  73
CHRIS
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


  1   2   3   >