Tracking cookies
Hello, I use SeaMonkey every day, and I send thanks to the people who develop it. Whenever my pc starts having slow to very slow responses, I run Superantispyware, and it usually finds tracking cookies. After these are removed, it runs more like it should. So I'm writing to ask if code could be added to the program to prevent the tracking cookies from being added. While they might be regularly updated, it seems like there should be some commonality that could be detected and prevented. Thank you. Larry Bush l...@att.net ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
David Wilkinson wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 12/1/2009 3:38 AM, David Wilkinson wrote: Bush wrote: Read my other post and you will see my wifes computer Has seamonkey 1.1.14 on it and the Tvguide site loads great ... The program discription works great . here is her ABOUT SEAMONKEY SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 The About SeaMonkey box reports what the browser actually is. The user-agent string is what the browser tells a web site that it is. If the user-agent string names FireFox, then many pages will display as they would in FireFox. No. If you go to the menu bar and select [Help About SeaMonkey], you get the user agent string that SeaMonkey currently sends to Web servers. In one of my profiles, [Help About SeaMonkey] shows Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 NOT Firefox/3.5.3 I use this profile only for those financial institutions that incorrectly sniff for Firefox instead of Gecko. Using the PrefBar extension in all of my profiles, I can make [Help About SeaMonkey] show the same Firefox spoof or show Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1) or Opera/9.10 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en) or Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/1.0.154.48 Safari/525.19 or even blank. Hmmm, it seems you are right. Sorry about that. So now I am puzzled by what Bush is telling us about his wife's computer. About WHAT ? Simple ... I went to my wifes computer and pulled up the About Seamonkey and it Showed she was using 1.1.14 and her computer can view the sites that Seamonkey 2.0 Cannot View . like the TV guide website . Did I start a Can of Worms on my original POST ? Note that there is no about:SeaMonkey for the address area. What do you mean by this? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
David Wilkinson wrote: Bush wrote: So now I am puzzled by what Bush is telling us about his wife's computer. About WHAT ? Simple ... I went to my wifes computer and pulled up the About Seamonkey and it Showed she was using 1.1.14 and her computer can view the sites that Seamonkey 2.0 Cannot View . like the TV guide website . It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours, which does). Please follow what I said ... We both Can see what the other is seeing on those web sites ... They say hers is Not Spoofed with 1.1.14 And they say Mine is spoofed with 1.1.18 Both of our computer can See What Seamonkey 2.0 cannot See . I think there is a site called photobucket . I may just create an account and Upload Screen shots from Each Computer . Start up 2 incidents of seamokey 1.1.14 on my wifes computer . One page will have that TV guide site in the background and I will Shrink the 2nd incident with About seamonkey in Front of the TV guide page ... Do a Screen shot and Upload that Screen shot to Photobucket . And likewise Do the Same with my Computer That is runnung What they are saying as SPOOFED Ver 1.1.18 And put a link to Each screenshot here . This will be Done Tomorrow . Will this Satified All of YOU ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
David Wilkinson wrote: Bush wrote: It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours, which does). Please follow what I said ... We both Can see what the other is seeing on those web sites ... They say hers is Not Spoofed with 1.1.14 And they say Mine is spoofed with 1.1.18 Both of our computer can See What Seamonkey 2.0 cannot See . I think there is a site called photobucket . I may just create an account and Upload Screen shots from Each Computer . Start up 2 incidents of seamokey 1.1.14 on my wifes computer . One page will have that TV guide site in the background and I will Shrink the 2nd incident with About seamonkey in Front of the TV guide page ... Do a Screen shot and Upload that Screen shot to Photobucket . And likewise Do the Same with my Computer That is runnung What they are saying as SPOOFED Ver 1.1.18 And put a link to Each screenshot here . This will be Done Tomorrow . Will this Satified All of YOU ? I am not saying I do not believe you. I am saying that I am puzzled by what you are reporting. Everybody else with an unaltered version of 1.x or 2.0 says the TVGuide site does not work correctly. When I had 2.0 om my computer I do not think I went to The TV guide site . But I did go to the blm site and IT did not view the site . I uninstalled 2.0 reinstalled 1.1.18 and I can view Both Sites . My Wife Has XP and seamonkey 1.1.14 And her computer Can View Both Sites .And the TV guide sit does show the info on the programs when I click it and the info is in a RED box that has a White background I view it the Same way on my computer as hers . I do have the Photobucket site Set up But I think u want to see my wifes computer Screenshot .. Her computer is in the Bedroom and I will be in Big trouble if I go in their and turn on the lights . I am going to Create a screen shot of my computer with the TVguide site and also the about seamonkey page .. The link will be in the next line I hope this works tomorrow I will do one from my wifes computer http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii69/willy48529/?action=viewcurrent=tvguide.jpg ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Bush wrote: David Wilkinson wrote: Bush wrote: It is not that she is using SeaMonkey 1.1.14, but rather that the user agent string is apparently not spoofing FireFox (unlike yours, which does). Please follow what I said ... We both Can see what the other is seeing on those web sites ... They say hers is Not Spoofed with 1.1.14 And they say Mine is spoofed with 1.1.18 Both of our computer can See What Seamonkey 2.0 cannot See . I think there is a site called photobucket . I may just create an account and Upload Screen shots from Each Computer . Start up 2 incidents of seamokey 1.1.14 on my wifes computer . One page will have that TV guide site in the background and I will Shrink the 2nd incident with About seamonkey in Front of the TV guide page ... Do a Screen shot and Upload that Screen shot to Photobucket . And likewise Do the Same with my Computer That is runnung What they are saying as SPOOFED Ver 1.1.18 And put a link to Each screenshot here . This will be Done Tomorrow . Will this Satified All of YOU ? I am not saying I do not believe you. I am saying that I am puzzled by what you are reporting. Everybody else with an unaltered version of 1.x or 2.0 says the TVGuide site does not work correctly. When I had 2.0 om my computer I do not think I went to The TV guide site . But I did go to the blm site and IT did not view the site . I uninstalled 2.0 reinstalled 1.1.18 and I can view Both Sites . My Wife Has XP and seamonkey 1.1.14 And her computer Can View Both Sites .And the TV guide sit does show the info on the programs when I click it and the info is in a RED box that has a White background I view it the Same way on my computer as hers . I do have the Photobucket site Set up But I think u want to see my wifes computer Screenshot .. Her computer is in the Bedroom and I will be in Big trouble if I go in their and turn on the lights . I am going to Create a screen shot of my computer with the TVguide site and also the about seamonkey page .. The link will be in the next line I hope this works tomorrow I will do one from my wifes computer http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii69/willy48529/?action=viewcurrent=tvguide.jpg This may work better http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii69/willy48529/tvguide.jpg ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/29/2009 10:07 PM, Bush wrote: Too bad I am Using Windows 7 professional... Now How did that error Happen ? As stated before . I know nothing about Spoofing... Its just that the method Both of you think is Accurate , IS in NO WAY accurate . Windows 7 Pro and Seamonkey 1.1.18 No Xp on my hard drive , I did a NEW INSTALL ( No Upgrade) of win 7 . and here is your So called spoofing results again SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 It's not an error. You had to have set a preference to say that you are using Firefox 2.0.0.7 on Windows XP (which is the meaning of Windows NT 5.1). ps... When I had Xp and Seamonkey 1.1.18 I was able to get into the Blm Website . and prior to win7 installation I NEVER installed The Firefox standalones on this computer . I first went to Blm site Way back in 2002 when I started Research on my Family History . I found my Grandfathers Homesteader property via that site and even printed out a copy of the Deed , So I guess I SPOOFED seamonkey to read as seamonkey 2.0 . SEVEN years before seamonkey 2.0 was released . Way back in 2002, the site had to be different. They upgraded (??) the site sometime in the past 7 years. You never noticed because, when that happened, you were already telling Web servers that you were using Firefox. Does not make any Sence that I could So Called SPOOF an earlier Version Way before the newer Version Was even Thought of .. What about Win 7 and Win xp thing ? I will have to Check and see if win7 is running ver 1.1.18 in Compatibility Mode . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 No, NO NO!! Its not the install of 2.0 that's reporting the wrong UA, its your 1.1.18!!! And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Totslly useless information snipped. I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.1 You got right in because the UA string which *you* reported in another thread is incorrect. Someone, either you or someone with access to your machine permanently changed the UA string. SeaMonkey will not do this by itself. SeaMonkey is not going to report a UA of an antiquated version of Firefox without user intervention. If it was not you, it was someone with access to your machine. I dare you to try creating a new profile in SeaMonkey 1.1.18, and see if you can get in. Create this new profile, and report it back here. It *will* show the correct UA for SeaMonkey. Lee I already created a new profile and it Reads the Same . I even uninstalled 1.1.18 and Deleted all files and even wiped the folders . And dowloaded Seamonkey 1.1.18 again and installed it . Remade the profile . and here is what it says SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now Tell me How you Spoof it . Where Do i type in SPOOF ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.18 Yes you did - you spoofed Firefox just fine: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now, toddle along enjoy your ignorance. But if you'd really like to understand what/when/where, why not try being such an ass and work with the folks who are _trying_ to help you? Please click 'Help|About SeaMonkey' and tell us what shows under 'SeaMonkey 1.1.18'. Don't be afraid, you can copy and paste the result here. My guess is that it will show: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 and you'll find that Firefox/2.0.0.7 is *not* a valid/normal UA in a standard SeaMonkey install. Somewhere along the line you, or whoever installed SeaMonkey for you, added the Firefox/2.0.0.7 into your profile for Firefox spoofing. That's not necessarily a bad thing (subject to some debate), but just understand it is *not* standard and is there for Fx spoofing. Please tell us what you see when you enter: about:plugins Just the header/main such as: Default Plugin Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_16 etc. File name: npoji610.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla MIME Type Description SuffixesEnabled application/x-java-vm JavaYes Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U17 File name: npjpi160_17.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla Now enter: about:config and enter: firefox in the Filter box. What do you see? Nothing Happens . after pushing Enter Key . Bottom screen goes Blank if I enter Seamonkey I get I only have one hand so hopefully I get this corect general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Works correctly here Seamonkey 1.1.18 Win7 pro It only works because your user agent string reports Firefox, not SeaMonkey. Heck, here it is from your headers: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Blast it, it says Firefox, not SeaMonkey. That is the only reason it works for you. Open 1.1.18, click ToolsSwitch Profile. Use that to open Profile Manager. Create a new profile, call it Test. Open 1.1.18 in that test profile, and try to get into the sites you say work. You will fail. Click About SeaMonkey and check the string. It will say SeaMonkey 1.1.18, not Firefox 2.0.0.7. Try it and lets put this nonsense to rest. Lee Better yet I will try it on my Wifes computer , Then on my Daughters computer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Please disregard anything Bush has to say on this subject, his 1.1.18 UA is spoofed to Firefox 2.0.0.7, and he does not seem to understand that. SM 1.1.18 will not do any better then Sm 2.0 in this case. I get the same result as you when I use the correct User Agent for SeaMonkey 2.0. When I change the UA, using the Preferences Toolbar, I can get it to work as it should, spoofing as FF 2.0. I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee OK by this if I spoof the UA which I did by installing (User Agent Switcher) and spoofed IE-7. However, this did not get it to work, the only way it works is to use Internet Explorer. Any ideas on how to get this to work, I hate having to run IE. Thank you everyone. just went to my wifes computer and it Has seamonkey 1.1.14 Win xp And it Views the Site perfectly . SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates Having read your ranting in other threads, and not paying attention to what you've been told (esp re user agent spoofing), I'd say you've made the best choice - for all of us. No one told me How I Spoofed ? So How Do you Spoof Seamonkey ? The main thing is I went back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 and no problems Still looking for Spoofing ... New hard drive New install of Win 7 New install of Seamonkey 2.0 And I guess My install SPOOFED Mozilla's mistakes . And Quit Adding to the problem, By telling me thing I NEVER DID . The SOFTWARE DIDNOT install Correctly . As far as the other post go ' http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I got right into it with Seamonkey 1.1.18 Yes you did - you spoofed Firefox just fine: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Now, toddle along enjoy your ignorance. But if you'd really like to understand what/when/where, why not try being such an ass and work with the folks who are _trying_ to help you? Please click 'Help|About SeaMonkey' and tell us what shows under 'SeaMonkey 1.1.18'. Don't be afraid, you can copy and paste the result here. My guess is that it will show: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 and you'll find that Firefox/2.0.0.7 is *not* a valid/normal UA in a standard SeaMonkey install. Somewhere along the line you, or whoever installed SeaMonkey for you, added the Firefox/2.0.0.7 into your profile for Firefox spoofing. That's not necessarily a bad thing (subject to some debate), but just understand it is *not* standard and is there for Fx spoofing. Please tell us what you see when you enter: about:plugins Just the header/main such as: Default Plugin Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_16 etc. File name: npoji610.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla MIME Type Description Suffixes Enabled application/x-java-vm Java Yes Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U17 File name: npjpi160_17.dll Classic Java Plug-in 1.6.0_17 for Netscape and Mozilla Now enter: about:config and enter: firefox in the Filter box. What do you see? Nothing Happens . after pushing Enter Key . Bottom screen goes Blank if I enter Seamonkey I get I only have one hand so hopefully I get this corect general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 AHA!! Note, *userset*!!! Note that the pref is probably in bold. That tells us that a user has changed the default setting. Right click on the pref and choose reset. That will set it back to the default setting. Lee yes the whole line was in Bold ... Everyone in my home Has their own computers . I am the only one who uses this one . Could it Be that Win 7 uninstaller left seamonker 2.0 setting in the Registry ? look at my answer when I went to my wifes computer that has Seamonkey 1.1.14 I Sent her about seamonkey to me SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx and the above link works on hers. I almost got Killed for waking her up. Almost hat a tiger wood situation .. You think I am a Dick or pulling your chain. But in No way did I So called Spoof Seamonkey . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Danny Kile wrote: Web site work in IE but not in Seamonkey 2.0. However, it did not work in Seamonkey 1.1.18 either. When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. The link is: http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx Please disregard anything Bush has to say on this subject, his 1.1.18 UA is spoofed to Firefox 2.0.0.7, and he does not seem to understand that. SM 1.1.18 will not do any better then Sm 2.0 in this case. I get the same result as you when I use the correct User Agent for SeaMonkey 2.0. When I change the UA, using the Preferences Toolbar, I can get it to work as it should, spoofing as FF 2.0. I suggest writing them to tell tem of the problem, it should be easy to fix on their end. As a short term fix, changing the UA, using either the UA switcher extension, or the PrefBar will get it to work. Lee OK by this if I spoof the UA which I did by installing (User Agent Switcher) and spoofed IE-7. However, this did not get it to work, the only way it works is to use Internet Explorer. Any ideas on how to get this to work, I hate having to run IE. Thank you everyone. just went to my wifes computer and it Has seamonkey 1.1.14 Win xp And it Views the Site perfectly . SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx SeaMonkey does display the site. Note the OP's post, click o one of the shows in the listings at the bottom. It is supposed to give information on the show. Without UA spoofing, it shows a block white box. Nice Red colors ... as stated it works fine . Is that working for you? Also, try your government site on your wife's computer. Yes there are no problem with the Blm site . And by the way All my wife does on her computer is Read and Send email and play Games and chat on http://www.pogo.com. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/30/2009 06:33 PM, Bush wrote: Graham wrote: Bush wrote: /snip/ general.useragent.extra.seamonkey userset string firefox/2.0.0.7 AHA!! Note, *userset*!!! Note that the pref is probably in bold. That tells us that a user has changed the default setting. Right click on the pref and choose reset. That will set it back to the default setting. Lee yes the whole line was in Bold ... Everyone in my home Has their own computers . I am the only one who uses this one . Could it Be that Win 7 uninstaller left seamonker 2.0 setting in the Registry ? look at my answer when I went to my wifes computer that has Seamonkey 1.1.14 I Sent her about seamonkey to me SeaMonkey 1.1.14 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 http://www.tvguide.com/listings/default.aspx and the above link works on hers. I almost got Killed for waking her up. Almost hat a tiger wood situation .. You think I am a Dick or pulling your chain. But in No way did I So called Spoof Seamonkey . I admit, I am getting frustrated, but I sense we are getting some light at the end of the tunnel. The SeaMonkey UA will say SeaMonkey 2.0. Here is mine, note I am on a Mac: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 Lightning/1.0pre Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 SeaMonkey/2.0 Your wife has SM 1.1.14. I suggest updating that to 1.1.18, by the way. The TVGuide page does seem to work without spoofing, but note Danny's original post, with the following: When looking and the program listing if you click on a show it will display a opening that show a description. However, in Seamonkey if just show a blank. Just tried my computer at tvguid and clicked a show showing on HBO and I get a RED box with a desription of the movie . So, rather then just opening the page, you have to go to the program listings, then click on a show to see details. If SM has its proper UA, it will show a blank space. If it is spoofed as FF, it will work. I wish it were Daytime.. I would go try it on my wifes computer . But I do not need her Chasing me down the driveway with a Golf Club . You, or someone using your computer did change the UA. There is no other way for this to happen. I can see how SM *might* reset to its default on its own, but there is no way it will change the UA to an antiquated version of Firefox on its own. Sorry .. I do all the computer repair here . And no way did I mess with any setting other That What is in the Menu's . FF 2.0.0.7 was released over two years ago. It is certainly possible that you had a problem viewing a site, were advised to reset the UA to the then current version of Firefox, and, over these more then two years, forgot that you had done it. I know that I can not certainly swear to things I did over two years ago. I got interested in my Family history, After I lost my hand. on April 1, 1998 . And I created a cd that I gave to all my relatives ( starting around 2001) with the info I discovered . and a lot of that info came from the Blm site I only started having problems when I installed seamonkey 2.0 , It looks suspicious to you, But I have never installed Firefox or thunderbird on any of the computers Here . But that is Beside the point Because when win 7 was released ( I bought it From microsoft ) I bought a new Sata Drive . installed win7 pro and then Seamonkey 1.1.18 Then I saw that 2.0 was on the seamonkey site as the Current release .. Uninstalled 1.1.18 and installed 2.0 . Had too many problems access e-mail and certain sites, So I uninstalled 2.0 and reinstalled 1.1.18 and Now u say I spoofed it ... Anyhow, if you reset the pref in about:config as I described elsewhere, you will find that reverting to 1.1.18 is not an answer to these kind of problems. Right now I donot think I should mess with something that is access all the websites . I know u are trying to figure out WHY . and I hope your Conversations May help the develpers figure this out in the Future . Thanks for the help Lee .I may answer some more of you inquiries later. But typing with one hand makes the good Hand Hurt .. I already lost one hand and do not want to loose the remaining one . Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Certificates.
Ever time I go to a site that I have never Been to, I have ADD their Certificate to the list Manually .Preference / privacy amd security/ certificates/ manage certificates . What should I have Click in Preference / privacy amd security /validation ... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: unable to send mail
u...@domain.invalid wrote: I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops up an box saying: Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and password' for that server or contact your service provider. I don't have the authenticate box checked. Anyone know whats going on? Try to turn off SSL.. Att / Yahoo have problems with e-mail Some Jerk at Yahoo Had my webmail server set to tahoo.com instead of yahoo.com. Notice the Y is right net to the T on the keyboard . It took a few hours before att got Yahoo to correct it ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: unable to send mail
u...@domain.invalid wrote: That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this message and why won't my mail go out? I think we both are in the same situation as far sa seamonkey 2.0 .. Time to go Back to an older Version... This one is Terrible . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey 2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA Time for me to go back to 1.1.18 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: unable to send mail
jim wrote: On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:36:29 -0500, Bushe...@elmie.uk in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: u...@domain.invalid wrote: I am unable to send e-mail with seamonkey 2.0 when I click send it pops up an box saying: Sending of message failed. An error occurred sending mail: Unable to authenticate to SMTP server mail.bellsouth.net. It does not support authentication (SMTP-AUTH) but you have chosen to use authentication. Uncheck 'Use name and password' for that server or contact your service provider. I don't have the authenticate box checked. Anyone know whats going on? Try to turn off SSL.. Att / Yahoo have problems with e-mail Some Jerk at Yahoo Had my webmail server set to tahoo.com instead of yahoo.com. Notice the Y is right net to the T on the keyboard . It took a few hours before att got Yahoo to correct it By chance, was that complete server name pop.att.yahoo.com? YES If so, it didn't work for me. All of my email clients (several) work off of mail.bellsouth.net. (at least SM2 could *get* mail with that one. And I am using that one for SM 1.1.18.) jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Certificates.
Bush wrote: Ever time I go to a site that I have never Been to, I have ADD their Certificate to the list Manually .Preference / privacy amd security/ certificates/ manage certificates . What should I have Click in Preference / privacy amd security /validation ... I got ris of seamonkey 2.0 and went back to ver 1.1.18 and No problems with Certificates ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0
Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ? I haven't tested much, but you could try these settings: http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091115.png (16 KB) Hartmut Same settings I have Here . Just maybe it is a Windows 7 thing? I never saw any Tabs since Netscape 1.1 until Mozilla 2.0. And Yes I still have the 1.44 Floppy that contained 1.1 setup. Netscape had tabbed browsing starting with 6.0, and continued to the end with 9. Mozilla Suite had tabbed browsing from the beginning. 1.0 had it, as dd every other version released, There was never a Mozilla 2.0, so I am not sure where you are coming from on that one. If you are talking about Firefox 2.0. well Firefox has also had tabbed browsing since its inception as Phoenix. The simplest answer is just don't use them. Maybe you could post an example of when a tab opens when you don't want it to, so we can advise you as to how to avoid it. Lee Now that screen shots is abandoned where do I send screenshot. send me your email address and I'll show where its not needed Phillip, you have a web site. Why not upload your screenshot to that space, and then link to it? Lee Okay: http://www.phillipmjones.net/NoTabs.png BTW: I've converted most of my html pages to XHTML (XML) 1.0.i Transitional and as far as I can tell those that have been converted do not have any errors. checked through DreamWeaver 8 (yes can't afford the price of update to CS 4, for now) and I've used the code error check built into iCab I am not say everything is perfect but I am working on it. What is this screenshot supposed to show? I see a Mail/News window with no tabs open. How does it relate to the problem of not wanting tabs in Mail/News? Lee Didn't you see the tab bar above the Subject?? Sure I did. I also saw that there was only one tab open. From here if I select to hide the tab bar when only one tab is open, Mail/News honors that pref as well as the browser, so I only see the tab bar if I actually have more then one tab open. SeaMonkeyPreferencesBrowserTabbed Browsing Check the appropriate box. If that's not working for oyu, we will have to look further. How nice to Find a reply From a Sensible person Who Relises that We are Saying HIDE is BROKEN ( NON - Functional) Lee problem cured ... Follow the direction below #1 uninstall Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Install Seamonkey 1.1.18 Tabs are controllable . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
Bush wrote: Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey 2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA Time for me to go back to 1.1.18 I am now back to Seamonkey 1.1.18 ... I uninstalled the Beta version of 2.x ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Here is the fix #1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA #2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18 And the site is Viewable But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be released and try again . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.0 is JUNK .
jim wrote: On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 17:00:14 -0500, Bush e...@elmie.uk in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: Please post in this newsgroup, When a Good working version of seamonkey 2.X is available . 2.0 is real Buggy . It needs to be Marked as BETA Time for me to go back to 1.1.18 The funny thing is, I am running the last beta version of 2.0 in another physical machine, running XP just like my main one, with no problems. (I have sent and received several emails with it, using the server I mentioned a couple messages upthread.) jim I am back to Ver 1.1.18 and no more Beta problems. I'll try again after version 2.5 is released ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: unable to send mail
jim wrote: On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:51:51 -0600, u...@domain.invalid in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: That's just it. I don't have any connection security listed (the box shows none) or the authentication box checked. So why am I getting this message and why won't my mail go out? See the last suggestion to me of about two days ago -- try turning security on. I am going to try that when moved. For now i have reinstalled 1.1.18. jim Smart move Jim. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Here is the fix #1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA #2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18 And the site is Viewable But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be released and try again . I get the problem with SeaMonkey 1.1.18. On the SeaMonkey 1.1.18 menu bar, select [Help About SeaMonkey]. Under the large-type link for SeaMonkey 1.1.18 at the top of the page, do you see the following: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 If you see anything different, please copy the entire string and paste it into a reply to this message. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/29/2009 5:40 PM, Bush wrote: Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ Here is the fix #1 uninstall seamonkey 2.x BETA #2 reinstall seamonkey 1.1.18 And the site is Viewable But wait for seamonket 2.5 to be released and try again . I get the problem with SeaMonkey 1.1.18. On the SeaMonkey 1.1.18 menu bar, select [Help About SeaMonkey]. Under the large-type link for SeaMonkey 1.1.18 at the top of the page, do you see the following: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 If you see anything different, please copy the entire string and paste it into a reply to this message. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Okay, you spoofed your 1.1.18 profile to Firefox. That is the sole reason it works for you in 1.1.18 and not 2.0. Spoof 2.0 as Firefox, and it works too, as I have found. Your fix is ludicrous. You are letting your anger get the better of you. Lets take a deep breathe here. Lee I spoofed Nothing ... What is Spoof ? I had seamonket 1.1.18 and uninstalled it then I installed 2.0 Found it was a piece of Crap. So I uninstalled it And now I installed 1.1.18 again . Copied over the files I saved to DVD's prior to installing 2.0. I am Not Angry ... I love trying to Get a piece of Crap up and Running... But 2.0 is out of my Class . So how does one Get rid of this So called SPOOF ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
donotcall.gov
Cannot view Donotcall.gov because of the following . And there are other sites that give me the same error What is causing this Seamonkey 2.0 or Win 7 pro _ donotcall.gov uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/27/2009 8:16 PM, Bush wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 11/27/2009 9:51 AM, JAS wrote: Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I am using Windows and XP PRO and SM2 and have browsed around the site with no problem. JAS This is an obvious case of faulty browser sniffing. When I go there with SM 2, I get a three-line display: Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a000d' Type mismatch: 'CDbl' /Frameworks\Classes\Browser.cls, line 134 When I go there spoofing Firefox 3.5.3, the page displays. This is bug #419907, submitted almost two years ago (27 Feb 08) and still not fixed. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419907. If you (JAS) can view this site okay with SeaMonkey, you are likely spoofing Firefox. If so, you are not helping to fix the problem because the server logs for that site do not indicate attempts to access via SeaMonkey. As I stated when I created this post . Win Xp Home Seamonkey 1.1.18 Was able to access this site. --- Upgraded to Win 7 professional Seamonkey 2.0 Cannot access the site ... Both are the Same computer With SeaMonkey 1.1.18, I see the same error as with SeaMonkey 2.0. Bush: With SeaMonkey 1.1.18, go to your menu bar and select [Help About SeaMonkey]. Under the large-type link for SeaMonkey 1.1.18 at the top of the page, do you see the following: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090825 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 If you see anything different, please copy the entire string and paste it into a reply to this message. [I'm sorry if this appears posted twice. However, after almost 10 hours, my original posting of this reply did not appear in this thread.] Win xp and seamonkey 1.1.18 are long gone on this computer . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: donotcall.gov
Bush wrote: Cannot view Donotcall.gov because of the following . And there are other sites that give me the same error What is causing this Seamonkey 2.0 or Win 7 pro _ donotcall.gov uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) found the fix on google http://www.smop.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/03/25/firefox-3-security-madness/ 1. take a note of the site name 2. edit - preferences 3. privacy tab (nope), security (nope), ah, _advanced_ tab 4. hunt around a bit more, oh encryption sub-tab 5. verification tab?, ah, no, strongview/strong certificates tab (we aren't viewing then, we are adding an exception) 6. server tab 7. click add exception 8. type in the address of the website 9. click get certificate 10. untick permanently store if desired 11. confirm security exception 12. close all those windows 13. reclick link ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: donotcall.gov
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Bush wrote: Cannot view Donotcall.gov because of the following . And there are other sites that give me the same error What is causing this Seamonkey 2.0 or Win 7 pro _ donotcall.gov uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. (Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) found the fix on google http://www.smop.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/03/25/firefox-3-security-madness/ 1. take a note of the site name 2. edit - preferences 3. privacy tab (nope), security (nope), ah, _advanced_ tab 4. hunt around a bit more, oh encryption sub-tab 5. verification tab?, ah, no, strongview/strong certificates tab (we aren't viewing then, we are adding an exception) 6. server tab 7. click add exception 8. type in the address of the website 9. click get certificate 10. untick permanently store if desired 11. confirm security exception 12. close all those windows 13. reclick link This is in SeaMonkey, right? Those confused directions are for Firefox on Linux. (EditPreferences as opposed to ToolsOptions.) EditPreferencesPrivacy SecurityCertificates Click the Manage Certificates button. I always did think the traditional Preferences window was far superior to the Firefox/Thunderbird version. However, I got right in with SeaMonkey, no cert warning, no exception stored. When you got the warning page, was there not a link to add an exception? NO... Only a OK button. The older version of seamonkey gave me a choice to accept or Not. I already used the info in Seamonkey . And did notice that the steps were different . But in the End I did the Exception. Now off to Fix the Blm error... I seem to think that there was an add-on to the Versios 1.1.1X that let me Emmulate IE for certain Sites from within Seamonkey . The pull down was VIEW IN IE . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: breitbart.com
ST wrote: Hello, Is anyone else having trouble viewing breitbart pages. Mine comes up with about 1/2 inch of the article visible on the right side of the page. I can see about two letters of an article showing below the h in the word Search at the top of the page. The top headings are in their correct positions, but not the stories?! It seems to be the only site I'm having that problem with. Thanks, Steve win 7 seamonkey 2.0 The whole page is Viewable ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
JAS wrote: Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I am using Windows and XP PRO and SM2 and have browsed around the site with no problem. JAS Win 7 Win 7 pro and seamonkey 2.0 and the site doesnot Work... I was able to view the site when I had Xp Home and seamonkey 1.1.18 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey and U.S. Government site does not work
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/27/2009 9:51 AM, JAS wrote: Bush wrote: A US A site is not accessible with Seamonkey 2.0 http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ I am using Windows and XP PRO and SM2 and have browsed around the site with no problem. JAS This is an obvious case of faulty browser sniffing. When I go there with SM 2, I get a three-line display: Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a000d' Type mismatch: 'CDbl' /Frameworks\Classes\Browser.cls, line 134 When I go there spoofing Firefox 3.5.3, the page displays. This is bug #419907, submitted almost two years ago (27 Feb 08) and still not fixed. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419907. If you (JAS) can view this site okay with SeaMonkey, you are likely spoofing Firefox. If so, you are not helping to fix the problem because the server logs for that site do not indicate attempts to access via SeaMonkey. As I stated when I created this post . Win Xp Home Seamonkey 1.1.18 Was able to access this site. --- Upgraded to Win 7 professional Seamonkey 2.0 Cannot access the site ... Both are the Same computer ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Quicktime
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:40:44 -0500, /Bush/: Cannot download Quicktime plugin Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ? swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) http://support.apple.com/downloads/#quicktime I don't have problems downloading and installing QuickTime, but as far as I know the latest QuickTime version doesn't have a browser plug-in (don't know the reason for this). Thanks for the info ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Quicktime
David E. Ross wrote: On 11/25/2009 6:40 PM, Bush wrote: Cannot download Quicktime plugin Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ? swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) http://support.apple.com/downloads/#quicktime Tryhttp://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/. It did not give me a certificate error. On the other hand, I removed Quicktime more than a year ago. I was tired of having to upgrade to correct security vulnerabilities. The capabilities of Quicktime are found in a number of other applications that don't seem to have so many dangerous bugs. IE 8 even tells me the Certificate has problems . The issuer IS NOT a Trusted site . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Quicktime
Cannot download Quicktime plugin Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ? swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) http://support.apple.com/downloads/#quicktime ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Quicktime
Bush wrote: Cannot download Quicktime plugin Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ? swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) http://support.apple.com/downloads/#quicktime add seamonkey 2.0 win 7 professional. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Quicktime
Arnie Goetchius wrote: Bush wrote: Bush wrote: Cannot download Quicktime plugin Is this a Seamonkey problem or a window 7 problem ? swdlp.apple.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is not trusted. Error code: sec_error_untrusted_issuer) http://support.apple.com/downloads/#quicktime add seamonkey 2.0 win 7 professional. Downloads and installs okay on SM 2 and Win XP SP3 IE 8 also has a problem with the Certificates at apple ( HTTPS is not configured properly ) . But it let me download quicktime, But I have not tried to install it, I want to fix the problem with Seamonkey 2.0 I reinstalled Seamonkey 2.0.. Now it Tells me that The Plugin Docs site certificate has problems, Just as seamonkey 2.0 completed the installation . There are other sites that give me the same error that I originally posted here . Must be a win 7 problem because IE 8 also doesnot like the Certificates or the Site Have Bad configuration . Looks like I made a Big mistake by going to Seamonkey 2.0 and Installing window7 professional . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . Sounds like you may have other issues besides ATT - here is the post from the previous: On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) the ATT U-Verse servers: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23373360-ATT-YAhoo-Email-Customers-servers-are-down Note the dates. And also note this post from an ATT tech: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376409?hilite=ssl You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse But seriously... Your post were the only post that Were Blank in the message area . post from others were Fine . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 12:11 PM, Bush wrote: Well today SSL works on all my computers . Very Very Strange... Tech suport says Mozilla products cannot use SSL on att yahoo servers ,,, I do a few Newsgroup Postings, And All of a Sudden SSL works with Seamonkey . Very Very Strange unless Tach support Read Newsgroups Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . Sounds like you may have other issues besides ATT - here is the post from the previous: On 11/21/2009 04:59 PM, Bush wrote: ... Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . This might be of interest suggests that the problem may have been (what else?) the ATT U-Verse servers: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23373360-ATT-YAhoo-Email-Customers-servers-are-down Note the dates. And also note this post from an ATT tech: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376409?hilite=ssl You might want to hang out here for awhile: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/uverse Great response links.. Too bad I could not read this Today. Been looking at all post all morning . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: Lee wrote: Bush wrote: Has everyone else on Att Who reported that ssl port 995 doesnot work on att Suddenly get SSL back?. Well it works for me after all those earlier problems. My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Forgot to Add .. Tech Support Said it Was a Thunderbird / Seamonkey Problem... ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Bush wrote: My question is WHY did ATT Tech Support LIE to Me . Probably like mine who did not know what in the heck was going on much less of any help. Took me to Web mail... and it Worked so they Said it was not their problem since Webmail worked .. pop.att.yahoo.com ... This could have been a Yahoo problem ??? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonky on win7 computer
u...@domain.invalid wrote: I installed seamonky 2 on a computer with win7 on it. I would like to copy the mozilla folder in the documents and settings\user\ folder. But on windows7 it dosnt have a documents and settings folder anymore. Where do I put the mozilla folder on win7 so I can keep all my bookmarks and my email and newsgroup settings. Thanx Bruce mine is in users/bill/application data/mozilla/seamonkey/profile/ biocvgtu.default Bill mean your nameDrop your files into The *.default directory My win7 professional Has a Documents and settings , And it Directory Structure is identicle as /user Documentand settings /Bill/application data/ mozilla/seamonkey/profiles/biocvgtu.default ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news server isn't responding or your connection to the news server times out. That is not necessary. It can happen when you have checked the box 'Don't delete any messages', which can lead to an increased load while looking for new postings. Can last several seconds. If you try to read a posting in that interval, the body will be empty. I've noticed this on more than a few instances w/2.0 haven't figured out what the issue is. The issue is gone since i use 'Delete messages more than 60 days old'. Infuriating, though, that this setting is needed. The behavior was caused by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774. More often than not, if you close the newsgroup reopen and/or restart the msgs will fetch and appear properly. Clearing the cache should suffice. At least it was so for me. Hartmut the previous mess from Noop was blank here ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: This post was Blank ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news server isn't responding or your connection to the news server times out. That is not necessary. It can happen when you have checked the box 'Don't delete any messages', which can lead to an increased load while looking for new postings. Can last several seconds. If you try to read a posting in that interval, the body will be empty. I've noticed this on more than a few instances w/2.0 haven't figured out what the issue is. The issue is gone since i use 'Delete messages more than 60 days old'. Infuriating, though, that this setting is needed. The behavior was caused by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774. More often than not, if you close the newsgroup reopen and/or restart the msgs will fetch and appear properly. Clearing the cache should suffice. At least it was so for me. Hartmut Interesting... thanks! something else shows up in the headers of your posts subject : re:att/seamonkey/ssl From: NoOp glgxg#sbcglobal.net.invalied Date 8:08 PM Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Reference 1, 2 ,3, 4, 5 Sorry for the non caps, But I have only one Hand it it gets tired of typing . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 04:14 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: NoOp: On 11/22/2009 12:19 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: Perhaps you missed my post this morning on Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE? most of your post this morning Were a Blank Page .. No info what so ever . That may sometimes happen when you try to load a msg the news server isn't responding or your connection to the news server times out. That is not necessary. It can happen when you have checked the box 'Don't delete any messages', which can lead to an increased load while looking for new postings. Can last several seconds. If you try to read a posting in that interval, the body will be empty. I've noticed this on more than a few instances w/2.0 haven't figured out what the issue is. The issue is gone since i use 'Delete messages more than 60 days old'. Infuriating, though, that this setting is needed. The behavior was caused by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774. More often than not, if you close the newsgroup reopen and/or restart the msgs will fetch and appear properly. Clearing the cache should suffice. At least it was so for me. Hartmut Interesting... thanks! something else shows up in the headers of your posts subject : re:att/seamonkey/ssl From: NoOp glgxg#sbcglobal.net.invalied Date 8:08 PM Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Reference 1, 2 ,3, 4, 5 Sorry for the non caps, But I have only one Hand it it gets tired of typing . ignor,, I see 1 2 3 4 5 6 on mine also ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
NoOp wrote: On 11/22/2009 05:04 PM, Bush wrote: NoOp wrote: This post was Blank What post? Your headers show no reference header: Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:04:19 -0600 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:04:29 -0500 From: Bushe...@elmie.uk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey Subject: Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID:sludnzwbspsoqptwnz2dnuvz_sji4...@mozilla.org Lines: 8 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.204.66.91 X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-eCS5uOiw1Tq3o/VPWkIZZLrFfhF2BlM5cmSk+0hIbxOdvnmOB/yxDoKY5xzUxuNhcxvR85iFnageE1U!MVg15ewpmrn6j12abc187TXz3wST9IbYwrYVDdu/Y66umsJizjQM0xqdHC+w+pLNHdbaCUP0n3yC!q8I1aKLCR4g= X-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 1215 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:45018 NoOp wrote: This post was Blank Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp only some post from you are Blank.. all other post from others in this newsgroup has Text in the message box . Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. If Harmut's suggestion does not help, try closing SeaMonkey and reopening. Can you view the message now? Lee I have the group set to Delete Read messages .so they are Gone.. Very weird that only some of his or her posts are Blank . my computer is win7 and seamonkey 2.0 my wifes computer is Winxp Seamonkey 1.1.18 I am going to use my wifes computer in the morning to View this Group and See if I can see his post that were Blank. except for NoOp said and this area would be blank ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Bush wrote: Sorry But I am not sending the Blank post from NoOp only some post from you are Blank.. all other post from others in this newsgroup has Text in the message box . Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? I see no blank posts from NoOp or anyone else, in this thread or elsewhere. All messages have content (some more than others, but none blank). The problem is at your end, not his. The post to which you appear to be replying reads as follows: On 11/20/2009 06:25 PM, Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . No issues with standard ATT DSL here; still 995 w/pop.att.yahoo.com and 465 w/smtp.att.yahoo.com many email accounts via ATT. [end quote] Have to say I was wrong .. I just unsubscribed to this Group, Then re subscribed and Now I can see his all the post From him. No Blank posts . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: Is anyone else seeing Blank post from NoOp ? hope we get a few answers to see who is Cracking up.. u or Me ? Try Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Clear Cache, then select another posting and then go back to the one without body. Does this help? Hartmut I already Cleared my Cache. But only some NoOp post from him are Blank.. No one else's post are Blank.. in this Group or in other groups. If Harmut's suggestion does not help, try closing SeaMonkey and reopening. Can you view the message now? Lee I fixed it By Unsubscribing to this Group. Then Re subscribing Without closing and restarting Seamonkey . But why the blank post picked on him only will not be known. Thanks for Helping me verify that it was on my Seamonkeys End . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. AMEN!!! The same happened to me , But With 4 computers thru the gatway and ONE wireless. Had to turn off SSL as I stated . About a year ago Att sent emails telling us to Change to port 995 or we would not be able to Get e-mail after a Certain Date, Now they Tell us to Use port 110 with NO SSL . Server is POP.ATT.YAHOO.COM . The Outgoing Server is Still ssl port 465 . Smtp.Att.yahoo.com. Computer #1 Seamonkey 2.0 #2 Seamonkey 1.1.18 #3 seamonkey 1.1.17 #4 Seamonkey 2.0 #5 Wireless Seamonkey 2.0 And as posted above All e-mails Worked Fine till Yesterday . Tech Support Guy ( Thru Supervisor) Said No Support Except for OUTLOOK . Then asked me if he could help me with Anything Else .. i Said Yes ... Then told him HOW DO I DISCONNECT FROM ATT and setup a New ISP ... He Hung up the phone . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Lee wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: I have an ATT WorldNet account (same company, different product) configured on port 995 as it has been for years, and it is unaffected. I can send and receive mail normally, no complaints. SM 1.1.16. Hi Paul Well I have to SM 2.0 and previously reported on problems with my mail program and again this morning it started up again not connecting to my ATT ISP. Sure enough I checked my setting and under Server Settings connection setting showed SSL/TL and I have not done anything to change it that I know of. Reset it to none and it connected immediately so that leads me to believe for some reason it is resetting itself thereby causing my problems connecting for mail. The newsgroups though are OK. Just thought I would pass it on in case others might have the same problem. It cannot be a Seamonkey problem , Since we have been using SSL since 2.0 Was released . And Then BANG it quits working with No 2.0 updates . Wonder if any Thunderbirds users Have the Same problem ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Newsgroup 2 copies
Cedar wrote: Why am I seeing at least 2 copies of every message in this newsgroup? Could not Resist Asking you When was the last time you had your Eyes Checked . Seriously I do not have an Answer for you ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Change the port to 110 No SSL looks as if Microsoft is up to Something Dominating Browers ... How much is Yahoo and Att making on this Deal ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl
Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. don't you Remember The E-mail you got From ATT that Said You MUST use port 995 Before a certain Date ? Only Big $$ from Microsoft who Void that E-mail . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Att/Seamonkey/ssl - UPDATE
Paul wrote: Paul wrote: Bush wrote: Att uverse Informed me tonight that Due to Compatibility issues , They No longer Support Seamonkey Mail configured to port 995 ( ssl) but they Say SSL port 995 will work with outlook . Seamonkey users must use port 110 ( No security). Which doesnot make any sense to me . This is True With this computer With 2.0 installed Same with my wife's omputer with ver 1.1.18 Same with my Daughters computer , Ver 1.1.17 None of the above can use SSL Anyone else running into this problem? I am in the Flint, Mi area . My ATT - yahoo email pop3 is not working this morning. SM 1117, pop.att.yahoo.com, port 995. I am going to spend hours on the phone now with clueless ATT tech support. I let ATT install ATTInternetInstaller.exe on my comp yesterday after a modem p/w change. Removed it and purged all its data last night after 5 techs did not know anything about it. It DID come from ATT. Problem solved. When I changed my ATT account p/w and ATT updated the modem, I forgot to change the smtp p/w. Outgoing Port 465, SSL =ON, smtp.att.yahoo.com, works again. Incoming Port 995, SSL =ON, pop.att.yahoo.com, works. Glad you got it Going I just Tried again with 995 No luck Had to go back port 110 None SSL Talking to the Gateway at http://192.168.1.254/ I see nothing wrong with the Built-in Firewall All settings are correct . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mail problem
norm wrote: Norvin wrote: Norvin wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Norvin wrote: Using SM 1.1.18 and XP home and for the past few days I have been getting the following message when trying get my mail: could not connect to server pop.att.yahoo.com the connection was refused. This will happen for a short period of time and hour or so later it will start working for whatever reason. It has been off and on for a few days and I am not sure where to even start looking for a problem or who to call. I have checked my yahoo home using the internet side of SM and I can get my mail there. Any suggestions or directions that I may try. Thanks This has been a problem, but, unfortunately, only those with that ISP can give specifics. I hae ATT Worldnet iservers set up, and they are working without issues. So you have SSL enabled on the account? Lee Yes, SSL is enabled Now its working again, for how long? Seems to be an att issue. For a work-around, switch the incoming port to 110, which will also uncheck ssl. The issue is intermittent, seems to be regional and affects more than just seamonkey, so you should use the work-around for now, until att gets whatever issue they have with pop.att.yahoo.com fixed. Switch back to ssl/995 on occasion. If the issue recurs, go back to 110. Not just a mozilla thing . Mailwasher cannot get the att yahoo mail with ssl enabled . As stated it is an area problem. Even outlook Gets rejected Now ! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0
Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ? I haven't tested much, but you could try these settings: http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091115.png (16 KB) Hartmut Same settings I have Here . Just maybe it is a Windows 7 thing? I never saw any Tabs since Netscape 1.1 until Mozilla 2.0. And Yes I still have the 1.44 Floppy that contained 1.1 setup. Netscape had tabbed browsing starting with 6.0, and continued to the end with 9. Mozilla Suite had tabbed browsing from the beginning. 1.0 had it, as dd every other version released, There was never a Mozilla 2.0, so I am not sure where you are coming from on that one. If you are talking about Firefox 2.0. well Firefox has also had tabbed browsing since its inception as Phoenix. The simplest answer is just don't use them. Maybe you could post an example of when a tab opens when you don't want it to, so we can advise you as to how to avoid it. Lee Now that screen shots is abandoned where do I send screenshot. send me your email address and I'll show where its not needed Phillip, you have a web site. Why not upload your screenshot to that space, and then link to it? Lee Okay: http://www.phillipmjones.net/NoTabs.png BTW: I've converted most of my html pages to XHTML (XML) 1.0.i Transitional and as far as I can tell those that have been converted do not have any errors. checked through DreamWeaver 8 (yes can't afford the price of update to CS 4, for now) and I've used the code error check built into iCab I am not say everything is perfect but I am working on it. What is this screenshot supposed to show? I see a Mail/News window with no tabs open. How does it relate to the problem of not wanting tabs in Mail/News? Lee I see a Tab Bar above the message , So why is Tabs available in MAIL ? and for What Reason. Yes there is a tab bar, but only one tab is open. From here, if I choose to hide the tab bar when only one tab is open, Mail/News honors that, so if tabs are not being used, it should not display. See other messages for possible uses of tabs in Mail/News. Actually, this has been a much asked for feature, and has great possibilities. Lee Here have all these request come from?? Of Course I've not posted her for nearly two years with a few minor exception until SM2 Final came out. I see no valid reason of tabs in email and news. I've pondered the idea and it just seem useless, I read and respond to one email /News post at a time. I just don't see the value. I find if I try to do too many things at one time, I tend to make more mistakes than usual. I will 2nd the motion... But Some user like Tabs. some Don't So why favor those who like Tabs and make it impossible to completely Remove seeing Tabs . As we were able to Do in previous Version of seamonkey . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0
Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ? I haven't tested much, but you could try these settings: http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091115.png (16 KB) Hartmut Same settings I have Here . Just maybe it is a Windows 7 thing? I never saw any Tabs since Netscape 1.1 until Mozilla 2.0. And Yes I still have the 1.44 Floppy that contained 1.1 setup. Netscape had tabbed browsing starting with 6.0, and continued to the end with 9. Mozilla Suite had tabbed browsing from the beginning. 1.0 had it, as dd every other version released, There was never a Mozilla 2.0, so I am not sure where you are coming from on that one. If you are talking about Firefox 2.0. well Firefox has also had tabbed browsing since its inception as Phoenix. The simplest answer is just don't use them. Maybe you could post an example of when a tab opens when you don't want it to, so we can advise you as to how to avoid it. Lee Now that screen shots is abandoned where do I send screenshot. send me your email address and I'll show where its not needed Have you tried to get a Free Photobucket Account? I started this post ( subject) And Have come to relize that a select Few like TABS and will defend the fact That 2.0 WILL NOT let you disable Tabs.. Prior to 2.0 Tabs could be Turned off. The 2.0 Tab Turn off in Preference Just Does Not Work, Is This A BUG to Report ? Is this A Bug only with Windows 7 users ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0
Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Bush wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ? I haven't tested much, but you could try these settings: http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091115.png (16 KB) Hartmut Same settings I have Here . Just maybe it is a Windows 7 thing? I never saw any Tabs since Netscape 1.1 until Mozilla 2.0. And Yes I still have the 1.44 Floppy that contained 1.1 setup. Netscape had tabbed browsing starting with 6.0, and continued to the end with 9. Mozilla Suite had tabbed browsing from the beginning. 1.0 had it, as dd every other version released, There was never a Mozilla 2.0, so I am not sure where you are coming from on that one. If you are talking about Firefox 2.0. well Firefox has also had tabbed browsing since its inception as Phoenix. The simplest answer is just don't use them. Maybe you could post an example of when a tab opens when you don't want it to, so we can advise you as to how to avoid it. Lee Now that screen shots is abandoned where do I send screenshot. send me your email address and I'll show where its not needed Phillip, you have a web site. Why not upload your screenshot to that space, and then link to it? Lee Okay: http://www.phillipmjones.net/NoTabs.png BTW: I've converted most of my html pages to XHTML (XML) 1.0.i Transitional and as far as I can tell those that have been converted do not have any errors. checked through DreamWeaver 8 (yes can't afford the price of update to CS 4, for now) and I've used the code error check built into iCab I am not say everything is perfect but I am working on it. What is this screenshot supposed to show? I see a Mail/News window with no tabs open. How does it relate to the problem of not wanting tabs in Mail/News? Lee I see a Tab Bar above the message , So why is Tabs available in MAIL ? and for What Reason. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0
I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0
Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ? I haven't tested much, but you could try these settings: http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091115.png (16 KB) Hartmut Same settings I have Here . Just maybe it is a Windows 7 thing? I never saw any Tabs since Netscape 1.1 until Mozilla 2.0. And Yes I still have the 1.44 Floppy that contained 1.1 setup. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: I want No Tabs in seamonkey 2.0
Jay Garcia wrote: On 15.11.2009 19:02, Bush wrote: --- Original Message --- Hartmut Figge wrote: Bush: I do not want any tabs in seamonkey 2.0 . How do I get rid of the TABS. I have unchecked every thing that pertains to Tans in Preferences . Do I have to Go back to ver 1.1.18 to Eliminate Tabs ? I haven't tested much, but you could try these settings: http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/sm091115.png (16 KB) Hartmut Same settings I have Here . Just maybe it is a Windows 7 thing? I never saw any Tabs since Netscape 1.1 until Mozilla 2.0. And Yes I still have the 1.44 Floppy that contained 1.1 setup. There wasn't any tabs in NS 1.1. Wasn't that what I wrote ? anyone remember the old winsocks Days ? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.0 is buggy as hell and I'm not going to use it anymore
Jim wrote: I'm extremely disappointed in Seamonkey 2.0. The mail program bugs are too severe to warrant continued use. I've come to expect better from Mozilla releases. I didn't use Firefox or Thunderbird because I didn't like the feel and they weren't integrated as a suite. Now Seamonkey has lost it's original feel. Things that I liked about Seamonkey are gone (quick launch, quick mail filter 'clear' button). I've reported two or three of the glaring problems (folder listings disappearing, compact related issues). Until the major bugs are fixed, I'll stick with version 1.18. I will 2nd the Motion ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 1.1.18 Security Release
Bush wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 9/4/2009 5:20 PM, stan wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Hi all, Today, the SeaMonkey project released a new version of its all-in-one internet suite. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 closes several security vulnerabilities and fixes a few smaller problems found in previous versions. With that, SeaMonkey stays at the same level of security as its sibling Thunderbird 2, which has been issuing updates for the same problems recently as well. The SeaMonkey team urges users of older SeaMonkey versions, including the SeaMonkey 1.0.x series, which no longer receives security updates, to upgrade. Additionally, the team continues to strongly urge people still using the old Mozilla Suite or Netscape 4, 6 or 7 to upgrade to the new SeaMonkey 1.1.18 version. All these older software packages suffer from a large and steadily increasing number of security vulnerabilities because they are no longer being maintained. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 is a modern drop-in replacement, providing the same familiar suite functionality with additional features and fully up to date security. SeaMonkey 1.1.18 is available for free download from the open source project's website at www.seamonkey-project.org. Full news article: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2009-09-03 Downloads for all available platforms and languages: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#1.1.18 Release notes: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey1.1.18/ Greetings, Robert Kaiser SeaMonkey Council member Sorry to contact you this way. You just responded to my post about 1.1.18 having problems. Because the View menu has disappeared from my screen (as well as File, Edit, and Help), I am not able to see my post and your response. Also, I cannot click on anything in the browser as nothing happens. Can't get to any sites. I did and have been deleting the old SeaMonkey before installing a new one. By the way, I had this problem in previous releases but somehow it went away. This time, I am almost out of business. I have tried going back to 1.1.16 and 1.1.17, and reinstalling 1.1.18. Any help is very appreciated. Stan Is the entire menu bar missing? Or just parts of it? If the entire menu bar is missing: 1. You might be in Full Screen mode. Try using F11 to exit that mode. F11 is a toggle for both entering and exiting that mode; you might have accidentally hit F11 while reaching for the Backspace key. 2. You might have accidentally clicked on the nubby area (name unknown to me) at the far left of the menu bar. If you see a small area beginning with a right-pointing triangle, click on it once. This too is a toggle. There is a toggle of this type for each bar at the top of the window. Because of anomalous motion of my cursor -- resulting from my use of a laser mouse -- I occasionally click on one of those toggles when I meant to click elsewhere in the window. This site Works http://www.walgreens.com/pharmacy/default.jsp I wrote Walgreens and Here is their Response Below = We apologize for the problems you encountered while trying to use our online service. Our website works best with a PC using Internet Explorer. We are aware that Mozilla FireFox, Safari browsers browsers in Beta testing, as well as some Mac users, are not able to use all of the features on the website. We hope to have these features available in the future. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Will Windows restore affect SM?
stan wrote: If I restore my system to a few days back, will it also restore SM to a few days back? Stan Yes ... The only problem I notice with Sysytem Restore is That It Does not Restore MY DOCUMENTS directory . At least this is my experience .My documents comes Back as an Empty Directory . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Site doesn't appear correct on SM 1.1.17
Phillip Jones wrote: Hello, it been a while I vowed never to come back to this forum except to ask a question. I remain true to my vow. I am asking a question I have a puzzle. examine this page with SM 1.1.17: http://villageelectronicsservice.com/VacationSchedule.aspx Now use: SM 2, FF3.0/3.5, Omniweb, Opera or iCab. In all of those All-in-ones and Web Browsers The page for me views as it should. In SM 1.1.17 after the side text is shown then the main text shows about an inch to inch and a half wide. using the w3c validator, typing the link above shows numerous items needing correction and several warning. yet the other applications appear to load correctly. If you go to any links other than vacation, the pages work even on SM1.1.17. Anyone have an explanation. Same results here with Sm 1.1.17 Another site is the Same .. Started with SM 1.1.15 http://www.co.genesee.mi.us/treasurer/pi.htm Click onAssessment and Tax Information in the search box Choose SMITH ( just because it is a Common Name ) Then click one of the Smiths listed and See the Resulting page . It's Garbage One paragraph Written over the other . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: CNN.com displayed incorrectly
bern...@nospam.com wrote: Anyone else having problems with cnn.com displaying properly with 1.1.16 It was fine but something changed. It displays correctly with Internet Explorer. Any ideas? Thanks Bernie No problems here . Win Xp ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Attachments with Mozilla
Henry wrote: I'm running Mozilla 1.8.1.11 on a Win XP Pro machine. Until yesterday when I got an email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip would show and I could open the attachment. Starting yesterday, when I got an email with an attachment, the attachment paper clip would show but the box would be blank. No attachment was there. What did I do to cause the attachment not to show please? I know my Mozilla is old, but I'm happy with it, and truthfully afraid to change because I'm one of those people that when I change something everything goes to pot. Thanks Henry View/ Display attachments inline ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Backspace
Ray_Net wrote: Bush wrote: For some reason Everytime I push the Backspace Key, Seamonkey 1.1.14 goes back to the previuos URL that I was viewing .. Anyone know how to turn this off.? When posting in web blogs I am not able to Correct typing mistakes. Once I try to BACKSPACE the mistake, I am LOGGED out of the Website . I never noticed this before untill ver 1.1.14 That's perhaps how the web blogs site is html writted he did not allow to go back. May be the site changed that the same day you upgrade to 1.1.14 ... I talked with the Webmaster And found out it was a Seamonkey problem, That with Help from this newsgroup, We corrected it . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Update Backspace
The Url I am Refering to is http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/index When I try to write a comment to one of the stories , and Make a Typo, And I use the Backspace Seamonkey CLoses the Blog. Internet Explore lets me USE the Backspace to Correct the Typo. I See ( In Seamonkey help) That the BACKSPACE is Used for a Shortcut to Back... IE also uses that Shortcut.. Why doesn't Seamonkeys version of Flashplayer Turn off the Backspace Key shortcut , Where The IE version Does? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update Backspace
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Bush wrote: The Url I am Refering to is http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/index When I try to write a comment to one of the stories , and Make a Typo, And I use the Backspace Seamonkey CLoses the Blog. Internet Explore lets me USE the Backspace to Correct the Typo. I See ( In Seamonkey help) That the BACKSPACE is Used for a Shortcut to Back... IE also uses that Shortcut.. Why doesn't Seamonkeys version of Flashplayer Turn off the Backspace Key shortcut , Where The IE version Does? first of all, its not a flashplayer box where you type your comments. Flash has nothing to do with it. Its just an ordinary text box. Second, the backspace works just like that in IE. I tried it and it works. Therefore, there is something wrong at your end. Close SM, then click on the windows start button, then run and enter: seamonkey.exe -p this will bring up the SM profile manager. Create a test profile. Start SM using that profile. Does the problem continue in this profile. Thanks ... Just creating a Default profile Worked . But now My original Profile lets me Use the Backspace to Correct the Typo's Also. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Update Backspace
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Bush wrote: Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Bush wrote: The Url I am Refering to is http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/index When I try to write a comment to one of the stories , and Make a Typo, And I use the Backspace Seamonkey CLoses the Blog. Internet Explore lets me USE the Backspace to Correct the Typo. I See ( In Seamonkey help) That the BACKSPACE is Used for a Shortcut to Back... IE also uses that Shortcut.. Why doesn't Seamonkeys version of Flashplayer Turn off the Backspace Key shortcut , Where The IE version Does? first of all, its not a flashplayer box where you type your comments. Flash has nothing to do with it. Its just an ordinary text box. Second, the backspace works just like that in IE. I tried it and it works. Therefore, there is something wrong at your end. Close SM, then click on the windows start button, then run and enter: seamonkey.exe -p this will bring up the SM profile manager. Create a test profile. Start SM using that profile. Does the problem continue in this profile. Thanks ... Just creating a Default profile Worked . But now My original Profile lets me Use the Backspace to Correct the Typo's Also. then its probably one of those little glitches that happens every so often, and it corrects itself with a restart of SM. Thanks for the Wonderfull Tip . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email help
Norvin wrote: Using SM .14 and just recently started getting the messages: The RETR command did not succeed. Error retrieving a message. Mail server pop.att.yahoo.com responded: problem retrieving message. I am still able to send emails, send/receive on newsgroups, just not receive emails. I checked the internet side of SM and my emails are at my homepage is look at, so that tells me that SM is retrieving email from the server. SM is just not transferring email to the mail/newsgroup side of SM. Not sure if I have explain this well enough, but any help would be great. Did you do the Server changes att has warning you about for over a Year Now pop.att.yahoo.com Port 995 ssl = smtp.att.yahoo.com port 465ssl Check use Name amd password Then fill in your e-mail address === ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: unicode/western
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote: Bush wrote: One other setting that may have an effect is View \ Character Encoding \ Auto Detect \ Off. That's my setting, does yours match? Auto is Off try selecting Universal. I had the same problem and when I selected that, all my problems went away. Seems to work right now . ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
