Re: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Biju,

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:15:41 -0800 GMT (31/01/03, 03:15 +0700 GMT),
Biju Nair wrote:

 1. The CC list of the mail that i am forwarding is not comming.

Do you use the macro %CC= in your forward template?

 2. When i am replying to mails, i want to change the color of some text
in my reply. [like some tet to be in RED color to show that i am
really angry .. ;-) ]

TB's editor cannot do this. Even if you used another mailer where you
actually could change the colour of the text or particular words, I
wouldn't see it, because I have HTML auto-view turned off. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Who the hell wants to hear actors talk? -- H.M. Warner, Warner
Brothers, 1927.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/2
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



turn off synchronization

2003-01-14 Thread Nikolay Cankoff
Hello tbudl tbudl,
  
I'm using 'The Bat' mail client v.1.62.
  Is it possible to turn off synchronization that performs when I'm
  turning off the mail client.  

-- 
Best regards,
Nikolay Cankoff
14 ßíóàðè 2003 ã.
10:54



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Biju Nair

Hello Thomas,

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 12:14:46 AM, 

,- [ you wrote ]

TF Hello Biju,

TF On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:15:41 -0800 GMT (31/01/03, 03:15 +0700 GMT),
TF Biju Nair wrote:

 1. The CC list of the mail that i am forwarding is not comming.

TF Do you use the macro %CC= in your forward template?

Correct me if i am wrong .. I understand that when we use the macro
%CC we have to submit the list along with the macro.. what i want is
BAT should automatically pick up the CC list when i am forwarding the
mail

 2. When i am replying to mails, i want to change the color of some text
in my reply. [like some tet to be in RED color to show that i am
really angry .. ;-) ]

TF TB's editor cannot do this. Even if you used another mailer where you
TF actually could change the colour of the text or particular words, I
TF wouldn't see it, because I have HTML auto-view turned off. ;-)

Hmm. this means there is no way in BAT we can achieve this...??
:-(
'-





Regards,
 Biju



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Lost Admin Rights

2003-01-14 Thread Barry Higginbottom
Hello Ed,

Monday, January 13, 2003, 10:47:37 PM, you wrote:

EF Q1: I've lost admin rights to User1 after setting up User2 as a
EF User.  No admins, both users...is there a way to manually change a User
EF to an Administrator short of reinstalling?

This is a known bug.

I have sent in a bug report to Ritlabs and they have acknowledged the
problem and told me it will be fixed.

If you change any user to 'User' privileges then you will lose the
default administrator from the list. The only way I found to get
things back was to have all users set with administrator privileges.

I don't think it is a problem per se, I think everything functions as
expected but to get the default user back into the list it is
necessary to set every user back to administrator privileges.

HTH

-- 
Best regards,
 Barrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



counting the chars in the subject...

2003-01-14 Thread Heiko Kuschel
Hallo tbudl,

since this program has so many options... maybe there's a way to do
this:

I'm sending SMS as Email regularly. (I send an Email to a server, and
this is sent to a cellphone as SMS) The text is in the subject field,
and I never know how many chars are left and where the text will be
cut off.

Maybe there's a way to count the chars in the subject and put the
result in the body of the mail?
Just asking, maybe someone has got an idea...

TIA

-- 
Schöne Grüße
Heiko Kuschel - http://www.kuschelkirche.de/
  - http://www.kuschelchaos.de/
Ev. Kirchengemeinde Gochsheim - http://www.stmichael-gochsheim.de/
AMIGAplus: alles für die Freundin - http://www.amigaplus.de/



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Biju,

@30-Jan-2003, 12:15 -0800 (20:15 UK time) Biju Nair [BN] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

BN 1. The CC list of the mail that i am forwarding is not
BN comming.

Use %CCLIST in your forwarding template to show a list of the CC
recipients. Use %OCCLIST to show a list of the addresses in the
original message's CC field.

BN 2. When i am replying to mails, i want to change the color of
BN some text in my reply. [like some tet to be in RED color to show
BN that i am really angry .. ;-) ]

Not possible. Not possible *anywhere*. Sure, you can do it in HTML,
but you have to be sure the recipient will read it that way. You
can't. Sure other software *say's* it can do it. It can't. It's
pretending. If the recipient doesn't want to read it in colour, your
red is wasted. _Much_ better to use /ASCII/ emphasis. Then you know
that _everyone_ will read it exactly the same.

There is no standard for email that allows colouring of text.
RFC822/2822 specifies a plain text ascii content.

Some MUA (mail user agent - client) software lets you do all sorts
of fancy formatting then sends your message as one of:

1) an HTML page
2) an RTF enhanced document
3) with a custom header that only someone with the identical email
   client can understand and decode meaning that anyone else sees
   redboldrubbish like this/red/bold in the message.

So, just to repeat for clarity - this is *not* possible. Anyone who
says otherwise has got it wrong g.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/2 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+JAEJOeQkq5KdzaARAl6CAJwM1ol4xt6B39A3pZ/HA5weiypnygCgvXGZ
FmW54lb8VxqSFA9+BBSC2+8=
=zlRg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: counting the chars in the subject...

2003-01-14 Thread Gerd Ewald
Hello Heiko Kuschel !

  
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 12:08:06 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was 14.01.2003, 12:08 (GMT+0100) where I live, you (Heiko Kuschel)
wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:


 Maybe there's a way to count the chars in the subject and put the
 result in the body of the mail?
 Just asking, maybe someone has got an idea...

KArin, who is not member of TBUDL, asked me to forward the
following info concerning your problem:

8

Hi Heiko,

 Maybe there's a way to count the chars in the subject and put the
 result in the body of the mail?

of course there is a way:
you need 2 Quicktemplates, I call them sms and sms1
-
sms:
%COMMENT=%SUBJ
%ORG=0%-
%QINCLUDE=sms1%-
-
sms1:
%CLEAR%-
%IF:%SETPATTREGEXP='(?is).(.*)'%REGEXPMATCH='%COMMENT':%-
%COMMENT='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is).(.*)%REGEXPMATCH=%COMMENT'%-
%ORG='%CALC=_%ORG+1_'%-
%QINCLUDE='sms1':%ORG='%CALC=_%ORG+1_'%-
%COMMENT='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is).(.*)%REGEXPMATCH=%COMMENT'%-

Number of Chars in Subject: %ORG%-
-
write your text into the subject field, type sms into the text field
and press |strg|spacebar| 
The number of chars in the subject field will appear, and you'll see
it in the field organization in the mail header as well.

HTH!
KArin
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


8

-- 
Best regards,
 Gerd 
===
Tutorial for using regular expressions with TheBat! www.regenechsen.de
---
Any technology distinguishable from magic is sufficiently advanced
Arthur C Clarke
---
now playing: WDR2 :-)



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: counting the chars in the subject...

2003-01-14 Thread Heiko Kuschel
Hallo Gerd Ewald,

am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2003 schriebst Du:



 Number of Chars in Subject: %ORG%-
 -

Thanks a lot.

This program is just fascinating. I think I will learn to use all it's
features within the next ten years. ;-))

-- 
Schöne Grüße
Heiko Kuschel - http://www.kuschelkirche.de/
  - http://www.kuschelchaos.de/
Ev. Kirchengemeinde Gochsheim - http://www.stmichael-gochsheim.de/
AMIGAplus: alles für die Freundin - http://www.amigaplus.de/



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Biju,

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:31:31 -0800GMT (30-1-03, 23:31 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:

BN what i want is BAT should automatically pick up the CC list when i
BN am forwarding the mail

Do you mean that you want to be able to add cc-recipients to your
message?
In the message editor menu:
 View - Check 'Carbon Copy'
This will cause the cc-box to be shown every time you're editing a
message. TB can't show it only when forwarding messages.

Do want your cc-list be shown in the message? Add %cclist to your
forwarding template.

Do you want to show the cc-list of the message when you received it?
Add %occlist to your forwarding template.

 2. When i am replying to mails, i want to change the color of some
 text
TF TB's editor cannot do this.
BN Hmm. this means there is no way in BAT we can achieve
BN this...?? :-( '-

That's right. If you're really into coloured texts etc, then you
bought the wrong client.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: turn off synchronization

2003-01-14 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Nikolay,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:54:22 +0200GMT (14-1-03, 9:54 +0100GMT, where I
live), you wrote:

NC Is it possible to turn off synchronization that performs when I'm
NC turning off the mail client.

TB doesn't do any synchronization unless you're giving a manual
command. Synchronization with what?

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Biju Nair

Hello Roelof,

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 6:52:26 AM, 

,- [ you wrote ]

RO Hallo Biju,

RO On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:31:31 -0800GMT (30-1-03, 23:31 +0100GMT, where
RO I live), you wrote:

BN what i want is BAT should automatically pick up the CC list when i
BN am forwarding the mail

RO Do you mean that you want to be able to add cc-recipients to your
RO message?
RO In the message editor menu:
RO  View - Check 'Carbon Copy'
RO This will cause the cc-box to be shown every time you're editing a
RO message. TB can't show it only when forwarding messages.

RO Do want your cc-list be shown in the message? Add %cclist to your
RO forwarding template.

RO Do you want to show the cc-list of the message when you received it?
RO Add %occlist to your forwarding template.

The macro %OCCList has solved my problem w.r.t CC ;-)

 2. When i am replying to mails, i want to change the color of some
 text
TF TB's editor cannot do this.
BN Hmm. this means there is no way in BAT we can achieve
BN this...?? :-( '-

RO That's right. If you're really into coloured texts etc, then you
RO bought the wrong client.


No!!! my pal i have not selected the wrong mail client. It is just
that colors help us me expressing my emotions in a better way. ;-)
'-





Regards,
 Biju



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: counting the chars in the subject...

2003-01-14 Thread Biju Nair

Hello Heiko,

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 6:43:00 AM, 

,- [ you wrote ]

HK Hallo Gerd Ewald,

HK am Dienstag, 14. Januar 2003 schriebst Du:

 Number of Chars in Subject: %ORG%-
 -

HK Thanks a lot.

HK This program is just fascinating. I think I will learn to use all it's
HK features within the next ten years. ;-))

'-

Subject to condition that BAT IS not getting updated with the new
requirements / features in the comming next 10 yrs..;-))



Regards,
 Biju



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Andy Holt
Hello all.

OK, assuming you've not filtered out my email completely because I'm
using Outlook 2000 :-), I have a question (or two).  I've just found The
Bat!, test-installed it (latest as of yesterday, 1.62 is it?), and it
looks good, but it seems to me that a move from one email client to
another will be a massive investment of my time.

1. Is it worth it? (OK, I know you're all going to say yes!)
2. (for ex-Outlook 2000 users)  Being honest, are there any things that
OL 2000 does that you cannot do in TB!, that you miss?

Some small examples seem to be that:
- I cannot open different folders at once in different windows
- I cannot save searches and thus make explorer short cuts to them
- I cannot import OL filter rules (OK that's a one shot problem, but I
do have loads)
- I cannot export folders back to OL .PST files - this makes a migration
more risky

I'd be glad of any workarounds to these, plus feedback on the questions
above.

I've also not been massively impressed with stability / quality.  The
uninstaller doesn't work, for a start, and I've had a few 'crashes'
(didn't bother recording the details...)  Thoughts on this?

cheers__Andy__



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: turn off synchronization

2003-01-14 Thread Spike
Hello Roelof Otten,

On or about Tuesday, January 14, 2003 at 15:55:11GMT +0100 (which
was 9:55 AM in the tropics where I live) Roelof Otten responded:


NC Is it possible to turn off synchronization that performs when I'm
NC turning off the mail client.

RO TB doesn't do any synchronization unless you're giving a manual
RO command. Synchronization with what?

I think he may be referring to the message database compression
that occurs when the program is closed.  In my case I have this
set for all folders, which can take as long as 2-3 minutes with
the hundred-odd thousand messages in the folders! ;-)

If he wants to eliminate this, he must turn OFF message database
compression on exit, I'm thinking.  This would be under;

Account-Properties-Options-Compress all folders on exit [Checkbox]

or

Individually checked options for each folder created;

Folder-Properties-Compress the folder [Checkbox]

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

--
Flying in the stratosphere with The Bat! V1.61 on
Windows 2000 Vers. 5 0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
--



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Andy,

@14-Jan-2003, 15:11 Andy Holt said:

 Some small examples seem to be that: - I cannot open different
 folders at once in different windows -

Double click on any message in the message list. You can open dozens
or even (given memory and resources) hundreds of separate Folder
view windows. Enable the message list (in the view menu) for
the first folder view window and you should be all set.

 I cannot save searches and thus make explorer short cuts to them -

No. TB does not become part of the Explorer as MS product does. You
can copy search results into a new folder within the system if you
need a separate copy of the results.

 I cannot import OL filter rules (OK that's a one shot problem, but
 I do have loads) -

A reasonable thought and not a lot that can be done about it.

 I cannot export folders back to OL .PST files - this makes a
 migration more risky

No, but you can export to other formats or (in-extremis) export the
folder contents as .eml or .msg files and drag them into Outlook
folders.

 The uninstaller doesn't work, for a start,

This was introduced in a recent update and is corrected in the next
release (1.62e).

 and I've had a few 'crashes' (didn't bother recording the
 details...) Thoughts on this?

Generally TB is acknowledged to be high on stability and on
standards support. It also has the most effective filtering system
there is and the fastest protocol transport capabilities. If you are
a power mail user, it is worth using in earnest for a week. If you
are a newbie anxious to make yourself completely immune from viral
infection, it is a godsend. If you are happy with the client you
have and TB would represent to bug a learning curve / wrench from
the familiar then it may not be for you.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/3 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+JCxxOeQkq5KdzaARApzpAJ4igJhLEVR7r3Ft4BxmdDfBzLduzgCg8gAU
7MOcz4rCWy1t/q3OTNPRgSE=
=BQ4J
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Jonathan Angliss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, Andy Holt wrote...

 OK, assuming you've not filtered out my email completely because I'm
 using Outlook 2000 :-), I have a question (or two).  I've just found The
 Bat!, test-installed it (latest as of yesterday, 1.62 is it?), and it
 looks good, but it seems to me that a move from one email client to
 another will be a massive investment of my time.

 1. Is it worth it? (OK, I know you're all going to say yes!)

I'd say 100% without a doubt. It may take you a little getting used to
at first, such as the editor, and filtering options... but once
everything is in your head, you'll wonder why Outlook never had half
the options.

 2. (for ex-Outlook 2000 users) Being honest, are there any things
that OL 2000 does that you cannot do in TB!, that you miss?

I couldn't comment. There are a lot of things I can say the other way
around that OL is missing that TB has.

 Some small examples seem to be that:
 - I cannot open different folders at once in different windows

Yes you can... it's just unusual how you do it. If you double click on
an email in a folder, it appears you have just opened an email... Well
that is almost correct. Now click on View - Message List. You now have
the folder listed in that 'email' window. You can open as many as you
want then.

 - I cannot save searches and thus make explorer short cuts to them

Save searches?

 - I cannot import OL filter rules (OK that's a one shot problem, but I
 do have loads)

This I've noticed... but TB's filtering is a lot more powerful, and
you could probably cut some of the filters out.

 - I cannot export folders back to OL .PST files - this makes a migration
 more risky

If you're not sure, you could set Outlook to leave mail on server, and
set TB to do the same. Then just play with both until you have made
that final decision. That way you don't lose any mail, and if you're
not sure, you can still jump back... if you wanted ;)

 I'd be glad of any workarounds to these, plus feedback on the questions
 above.

 I've also not been massively impressed with stability / quality. The
 uninstaller doesn't work, for a start, and I've had a few 'crashes'
 (didn't bother recording the details...) Thoughts on this?

Most curious. It depends on what you're doing I guess. Since I started
using TB! a while ago, I think I've had 3 crashes.

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQA/AwUBPiQtjSuD6BT4/R9zEQKM7ACdEFB7Mj0c/tSk9sNcjZ42uvAy6OwAoP+Z
C4jrIrLVDCAhKc5XFwt8ohzz
=Fith
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Same headers in Forward Reply, is this a bug?

2003-01-14 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello all,

I was re-reading a message that I had both replied to and also
forwarded to someone else. I wanted to see the reply I had written so
I hit CtrlBkSp but TB took me to the forwarded message and not to
the reply.

Looking at the headers I see the following:

,- [ Original message ]
| Subject: License Code Lombardia
| Message-ID: 3E106414.9505.15CB8BE@localhost
`-

,- [ Forwarded message ]
| Subject: Fwd: License Code Lombardia
| In-Reply-To: 3E106414.9505.15CB8BE@localhost
| References: 3E106414.9505.15CB8BE@localhost
`-

,- [ Reply ]
| Subject: Re: License Code Lombardia
| In-Reply-To: 3E106414.9505.15CB8BE@localhost
| References: 3E106414.9505.15CB8BE@localhost
`-

I am not familiar with RFCs but common sense (at least my common
sense) tells me that the forwarded message should not include an
In-Reply-To header. A forward is *not* a reply.

Does anybody know if this is a bug or WAD?

TIA.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Thomas,

 On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:15:41 -0800 GMT (31/01/03, 03:15 +0700 GMT),
 Biju Nair wrote:

What planet or galaxy is he writing from that it is already January
30th? ;-)

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Andy,

 - I cannot save searches and thus make explorer short cuts to them

No, you cant save them in the way you say. But the Message Finder
saves the last 9 searches you have done with all conditions (not
just the search strings). You can re-use any of them by opening the
Message Finder and going to Edit-Use previous conditions.

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Matt Thoene
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 @ 7:11:56 AM [-0700], Andy Holt wrote:

 2. (for ex-Outlook 2000 users)  Being honest, are there any things that
 OL 2000 does that you cannot do in TB!, that you miss?

Johnathan and Marck have answered your other questions but I wanted to
touch on this one. I used Outlook for several years. Due to Outlook's
susceptibility to virii, limited filter configuration, and poor poor
ability to view mail headers, I was always looking for a new mail
client. About a year ago I found The Bat! and have never looked back. I
can't think of one thing Outlook did that I cannot do in TB!. However, I
CAN think of many things TB! can do that Outlook could not. :] (Good ol'
F9)

--
Matt   



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 3:11:56 PM, Andy Holt wrote:

 2. (for ex-Outlook 2000 users)  Being honest, are there any things that
 OL 2000 does that you cannot do in TB!, that you miss?

I moved from Outlook 2002, and I cannot now think of anything that I
miss particularly, apart, maybe, from the ability of Outlook to track
shared documents, etc.  That is a theoretical issue, because in
reality I never used it anyway.  I still use Outlook for my contacts
and diary (I have not got round to finding a suitable replacement that
will work with my Palm), and there is no easy way of synchronising
address book entries, but this is not a major problem.

Some of the things that I can do with TB! out of the box, I had to
spend a lot of money on with Outlook.  For example, I used Email
Templates in Outlook (a costly add-on that cost more than TB!) which
had 1/2 the functionality and 1/4 of the ease of use of TB! templates
and filters.

 - I cannot export folders back to OL .PST files - this makes a migration
 more risky

As others have suggested, don't allow TB to delete mail from the
server.  You can then download it into Outlook as well, just in case
you want to go back.  I did this for a couple of weeks, although I
purchased the full version of TB a day after I downloaded it, because
I knew there was no going back!

 I've also not been massively impressed with stability / quality.  The
 uninstaller doesn't work, for a start, and I've had a few 'crashes'
 (didn't bother recording the details...)  Thoughts on this?

No problems here with crashes, and I haven't had to use the
uninstaller yet!

Julian

-- 
  Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Tmp files

2003-01-14 Thread Spike
Hello fellow tbudl'ers,

I have been exploring my drive for wasted file space and have
discovered 324 files in;

C:\WINDOWS\TEMP

The files are MOSTLY '0-byte' empty files, but there are 14 that
are between 21 and 45MB each, with the filenames such as
batA144.tmp.  What are these files and are they related to TB! or
not?  Can they be deleted safely?  The dates on them are all within
the range of time since I installed TB!, and seem to coincide
with dates that I may have upgraded versions, but I'm not
positive about that aspect.  None are newer (creation date) than
May 2002.  Viewing the smaller ones in Ultra-Edit reveals they
containg email addresses, subject lines and what appear to be
message ID's.

Comments?  Suggestions?  These files represent almost half a GB
of space being used (wasted?).  I run my mailer on a laptop so
that wherever I go I have ALL my messages, and I need to free
some space on the system.

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

--
Flying high with The Bat! V1.61 on Windows 2000
Vers. 5 0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
--



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Jonathan,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 09:32:25[GMT -0600](which was 15:32 where I
live) you wrote:

 Yes you can... it's just unusual how you do it. If you double click on
 an email in a folder, it appears you have just opened an email... Well
 that is almost correct. Now click on View - Message List. You now have
 the folder listed in that 'email' window. You can open as many as you
 want then.

I've never used this facility up until now when I thought I'd have a
go. It certainly is useful but where can you apply global settings
instead of having to reset each folder that is opened? For each folder
I open I have to reset the columns, window size and sort by Threading
and received time which is my preference.

--
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/3
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera.

In every walk with nature, one receives far more than he seeks.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: turn off synchronization

2003-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Spike,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:18:44 -0500 GMT (14/01/03, 22:18 +0700 GMT),
Spike wrote:

 I think he may be referring to the message database compression
 that occurs when the program is closed.  In my case I have this
 set for all folders, which can take as long as 2-3 minutes with
 the hundred-odd thousand messages in the folders! ;-)

This is exactly the reason why I don't compress on exit any more. I
purge  compress all folders (the menu item is still misnamed Purge
all folders) manually every couple of days.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS But it uses up a thousand  times
the memory.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Tmp files

2003-01-14 Thread jwayne
On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 11:27:30 AM, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

S I have been exploring my drive for wasted file space and have
S discovered 324 files in;

S C:\WINDOWS\TEMP

S The files are MOSTLY '0-byte' empty files, but there are 14 that
S are between 21 and 45MB each, with the filenames such as
S batA144.tmp.  What are these files and are they related to TB! or
S not?  Can they be deleted safely?  The dates on them are all within
S the range of time since I installed TB!, and seem to coincide
S with dates that I may have upgraded versions, but I'm not
S positive about that aspect.  None are newer (creation date) than
S May 2002.  Viewing the smaller ones in Ultra-Edit reveals they
S containg email addresses, subject lines and what appear to be
S message ID's.

S Comments?  Suggestions?  These files represent almost half a GB
S of space being used (wasted?).  I run my mailer on a laptop so
S that wherever I go I have ALL my messages, and I need to free
S some space on the system.

This has been an occasional topic.  Some people have experienced this and most
haven't. Don't think anyone every figured out why.

My 2 cents is that this is not a TB specific issue. Windows in general -
regardless of which version - does not clean up after itself very well. Nor do
many, many apps. Go to the average machine and you'll see tons of junk in temp.
Everyone should run an occasional cleanup routine to get rid of stuff in the
system temp and the user temp directories (latter is specific to W2K and Win
XP.) Also note that with W2K and XP you can delete files based on access OR
modified OR creation dates. Finally, it's often a good idea to run a
login/logoff script in an enterprise environment to automate this process.

jon
-- 
 jwayne  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Geoff Lane
On 14 January 2003, 15:11, Andy Holt wrote:

 1. Is it worth it? (OK, I know you're all going to say yes!)
---
This very much depends on your priorities. If you need all the bells
and whistles that Outlook provides (such as HTML, Outlook Forms, or
WordMail), then No.

If you need the security of an MUA that resolutely refuses to execute
malignant code or fetch offsite resources, then Outlook is a
non-starter. This is where I came in.

 2. (for ex-Outlook 2000 users)  Being honest, are there any things that
 OL 2000 does that you cannot do in TB!, that you miss?
---
- Built in calendar functions
- Notes (OK, you can fake notes, but it's not the same!)
But ... there are things in TB that Outlook can't match. For example,
TB's filtering is much more powerful than Outlook's rules; you can
attach templates to address book groups and contacts, to message
folders and to accounts.

 Some small examples seem to be that:
 - I cannot open different folders at once in different windows
---
Yes you can. Try this:
1. Double click a message. The folder opens with current message
   selected.
2. If required, from the View menu of the folder window, choose
   Message List.
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 for all other folders you want to view.


 - I cannot save searches and thus make explorer short cuts to them
---
Maybe not, but Edit-Use previous conditions in the Message Finder
lets you re-use the last nine searches.

 - I cannot import OL filter rules (OK that's a one shot problem, but I
 do have loads)
---
As you say, this is a one-off. You also have a bit of a learning curve
because the TB Sorting Office makes Outlook look pretty sickg

 - I cannot export folders back to OL .PST files - this makes a migration
 more risky
~~~
You can't. However, many of us use a relatively cheap shareware
product called Mailbag Assistant (http://www.fookes.com/) to manage
archives. This gives much of the benefits of multiple Outlook PST
files.

AFAIK, the only standard mail format that Outlook understands is
individual emails. This does make reverting to Outlook onerous. It's
easy to do (export from TB or MBA as individual emails), but
time-consuming.

FWIW, I've had a few crashes from TB. However, they only affect TB.
Contrast this with Outlook, which used to crash far more regularly and
take the OS with it, leaving an ungraceful shutdown the only option.

HTH,


-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
--
Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Richard,

@14-Jan-2003, 16:32 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

RW ... where can you apply global settings instead of having to
RW reset each folder that is opened?

I have Use the account default column settings enabled for all my
folders (well, most of them) and have no problem seeing them in that
consistent format.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/3 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+JD6KOeQkq5KdzaARAphvAKD7TbvDG22nwISGv29V5qNKdpLiOQCgjzft
R8VqblSHVKyYVEQIXptrBBU=
=z+DN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Tmp files

2003-01-14 Thread Jon Hall
I believe the tmp files are what TB creates when downloading pop
messages, because from time to time when my virus scanner picks up a
virus being downloaded, it locks the particular tmp file.
The reasons for it not cleaning them up could could be a variety of
things, including virus scanners, or TB just not cleaning up after
itself for some reason, like a crash.

They are safe to delete though. I delete mine on occasion.

-- 
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 11:27:30 AM, you wrote:

S Hello fellow tbudl'ers,

S I have been exploring my drive for wasted file space and have
S discovered 324 files in;

S C:\WINDOWS\TEMP

S The files are MOSTLY '0-byte' empty files, but there are 14 that
S are between 21 and 45MB each, with the filenames such as
S batA144.tmp.  What are these files and are they related to TB! or
S not?  Can they be deleted safely?  The dates on them are all within
S the range of time since I installed TB!, and seem to coincide
S with dates that I may have upgraded versions, but I'm not
S positive about that aspect.  None are newer (creation date) than
S May 2002.  Viewing the smaller ones in Ultra-Edit reveals they
S containg email addresses, subject lines and what appear to be
S message ID's.

S Comments?  Suggestions?  These files represent almost half a GB
S of space being used (wasted?).  I run my mailer on a laptop so
S that wherever I go I have ALL my messages, and I need to free
S some space on the system.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Andy,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:11:56 - GMT (14/01/03, 22:11 +0700 GMT),
Andy Holt wrote:

 1. Is it worth it? (OK, I know you're all going to say yes!)

Of course we are. ;-) In addition to what has been said already, let
me add the following:

The aspect that made me migrate to The Bat was the seperate handling
of multiple accounts. I know that Outlook can pop several accounts,
but all messages are put into the same inbox. This creates problems; I
have friends you have a private and a business email, and they want me
to use only their private mailbox, but when they reply to my messages,
the replies always come from their office email address. Luckily, this
can easily be overcome with TB's templates.

I myself never used Outlook but used to different email clients
(Netscape and Eudora), one for private and the other for business.
Equally inefficent.

TB solved the problem, and I have now 7 competely seperate email
accounts (at six different providers) within the same email client.
:-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

If God dropped acid, would he see people?

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Tmp files

2003-01-14 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Spike,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:27:30 -0500GMT (14-1-03, 17:27 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:

S I have been exploring my drive for wasted file space and have
S discovered 324 files in;
S C:\WINDOWS\TEMP

Those are all temporary files, that because of one reason or another
aren't deleted. You can delete everyone of them that's got a timestamp
older than your current Windows session.

S The files are MOSTLY '0-byte' empty files, but there are 14 that
S are between 21 and 45MB each, with the filenames such as
S batA144.tmp.  What are these files and are they related to TB! or
S not?

TB can create files with that nomenclature during the download of
messages and maybe while compressing.

S Can they be deleted safely?

Yep, as long as they aren't created in your current Windows session.
;-)

S Comments?  Suggestions?  These files represent almost half a GB of
S space being used (wasted?).

Delete them manually or go to the drive properties in the explorer and
select 'clean disk' (or whatever it's called in the English version),
you get a pop-up that lets you select what to clean: check 'temporary
files' and 'temporary internet files'

Other option is to add a line:
del c:\windows\temp\*.tmp
to your autoexec.bat, so that you're emptyinng the directory during
each startup, that ought to be a safe moment, since Windows hasn't got
the time to create them then. ;-)

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Tmp files

2003-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Spike,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:27:30 -0500 GMT (14/01/03, 23:27 +0700 GMT),
Spike wrote:

 I have been exploring my drive for wasted file space and have
 discovered 324 files in;

 C:\WINDOWS\TEMP

 The files are MOSTLY '0-byte' empty files, but there are 14 that
 are between 21 and 45MB each, with the filenames such as
 batA144.tmp.  What are these files and are they related to TB! or
 not?

The ones named bat*.tmp are related to TB. Whenever TB downloads mail,
it puts each into the tmp folder first, then imports it into the mail
database, and if everything is successful, deletes it from the tmp
folder. If there is a problem, the bat*.tmp file stays were it is, so
that you can debug (if you want to).

There can be two reasons why the files stay there regularly:

1.) Your connection is unstable. This was the case over here; at my
old appartment, the telephone conection was vut after 20 minutes, and
if that was during a mail check, such .tmp files stayed in the tmp
directory.

2.) There is a problem. Now, you mention that all these messages date
until May 2002. I remember there was a version that produced bat
droppings, but the problem has long been fixed (it could have been a
beta, I don't remember). Maybe you were running that version.

And yes, you can safely delete them.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Energizer Bunny arrested, charged with battery.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Tmp files

2003-01-14 Thread Spike
Hello Thomas Fernandez,

On or about Tuesday, January 14, 2003 at 00:03:18GMT +0700 (which
was 12:03 PM in the tropics where I live) Thomas Fernandez
responded:

TF The ones named bat*.tmp are related to TB.

Good to know!

TF There can be two reasons why the files stay there regularly:

TF 1.) Your connection is unstable. This was the case over here; at my
TF old appartment, the telephone conection was vut after 20 minutes, and
TF if that was during a mail check, such .tmp files stayed in the tmp
TF directory.

Not an issue here with ADSL :-)

TF 2.) There is a problem. Now, you mention that all these messages date
TF until May 2002. I remember there was a version that produced bat
TF droppings, but the problem has long been fixed (it could have been a
TF beta, I don't remember). Maybe you were running that version.

I believe this is the case.  They suddenly stop about the time I
did an upgrade to 1.6x.

TF And yes, you can safely delete them.

I like a good bottom line!  I deleted _everything_ in the TEMP
folder and recovered over 1.2GB of space!!

Thanks to all who responded so quickly.

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

Not everything that can be counted, counts. And not everything
that counts can be counted.  (Albert Einstein)

--
Flying in the stratosphere with The Bat! V1.61 on 
Windows 2000 Vers. 5 0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
--



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Marck,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 16:44:55[GMT +](which was 16:44 where I
live) you wrote:

 I have Use the account default column settings enabled for all my
 folders (well, most of them) and have no problem seeing them in that
 consistent format.

Hm, not here, well not everything. Some of my newer folders did not
have the default column setting selected (they do now) and I do at
least now get consistent window sizes an well as threading and
messages sorted by received date for View folders. However I still
get spurious columns that I don't want and that I do not have in the
main folders :-(

--
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/3
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera.

The fool who is silent can pass for wise



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: turn off synchronization

2003-01-14 Thread Gerard

ON Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 5:41:32 PM, you wrote:
TF This is exactly the reason why I don't compress on exit any more. I
TF purge  compress all folders (the menu item is still misnamed Purge
TF all folders) manually every couple of days.


Hi Thomas,

You might consider leaving the purge  compress option on for the Inbox
folder. All msg go through here before being filtered to other folders,
at least if you have it setup something like me.
This means that the inbox file will have the biggest amount of garbage
in it. A PC of the inbox would benefit the whole system performance.

--
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I catch fish in water that is more shallow than the rough here.

Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Gerard

ON Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 4:57:45 PM, you wrote:
MAU Hello Andy,

 - I cannot save searches and thus make explorer short cuts to them

MAU No, you cant save them in the way you say. But the Message Finder
MAU saves the last 9 searches you have done with all conditions (not
MAU just the search strings). You can re-use any of them by opening the
MAU Message Finder and going to Edit-Use previous conditions.


Hi Miguel,

Thanks for that. I was just repeatedly doing the same search and thought
what I great function this would be. Beaten by TB! again, you got to
love this baby :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Gerard 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Good players have the power to think while they are competing.  Most
golfers are not thinking even when they believe they are.  They are only
worrying.

Using The Bat! v1.62h on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: turn off synchronization

2003-01-14 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Gerard,

on Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:38:00 +0100GMT (14.01.03, 20:38 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :

TF This is exactly the reason why I don't compress on exit any more. I
TF purge  compress all folders (the menu item is still misnamed Purge
TF all folders) manually every couple of days.

G You might consider leaving the purge  compress option on for the Inbox
G folder. All msg go through here before being filtered to other folders,
G at least if you have it setup something like me.

You are right with that. I still prefer, not to have it automatically done
on exit, as sometimes, when I shut down my computer, I want it to shut down
as fast as possible, because I want to leave, and again have overestimated
the time left before my date... ;-)

So I do it like Thomas - purge and compress manually every now and then in
between my sessions, when there is some spare time. :-)

-- 
Cheers
Peter

Everybody repeat after me.We are all individuals.

Winamp currently playing: Gay  Terry Woods - Full Moon
  



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Anne
Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 3:11:56 PM,Andy wrote:

AH I've also not been massively impressed with stability / quality.  The
AH uninstaller doesn't work, for a start, and I've had a few 'crashes'
AH (didn't bother recording the details...)  Thoughts on this?


Andy,

I had to pick up on this as I've not had the problem you describe
despite using three different versions of TB! to date, including 1.62.
Crashes are very rare in TB! unlike Outlook Express which had a
tendency to fall over if you held you head at the wrong angle! I've
used the uninstaller as well and it does work fine - all it leaves
behind are the files which are created by you during the use of the
progran - e.g. your mail databases and address book, which is what any
decent software should do anyhow. Hope this helps :-)

-- 
Cheers,
 Anne  

Using The Bat! v1.62 Christmas Edition on Windows 98 4.10 Build  

Visit The Bat! Users' Unofficial Help Forum http://the-bat-forums.donzeigler.com



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Richard,

@14-Jan-2003, 19:28 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

RW However I still get spurious columns that I don't want and that
RW I do not have in the main folders :-(

The pop-up folder view is different from the Main window folder view
and stores and separate configuration. Just set the columns once and
they will be remembered for the pop-up folder too.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/3 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+JJmPOeQkq5KdzaARAraLAJ465mr9OygDHFc5QKc6zsbtSVZ07ACgzaOi
rKLTxiaPNFFMMQIzlpHH8BA=
=q2kO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Gerard,

 Beaten by TB! again, you got to love this baby :)

I do :)

-- 
Best regards,

Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Marck,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, at 16:44:55 GMT + (1/14/2003, 10:44 AM -0500
GMT here), you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I have Use the account default column settings enabled for all my
 folders (well, most of them) and have no problem seeing them in that
 consistent format.

Can you change the default column settings? If yes, how?

-- 
Best regards,

Greg Strong 
TB! v1.62 Beta/17 on Windows XP Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Marck,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 23:13:17[GMT +](which was 23:13 where I
live) you wrote:

 The pop-up folder view is different from the Main window folder view
 and stores and separate configuration. Just set the columns once and
 they will be remembered for the pop-up folder too.

Well that's very weird because, earlier on, I changed the columns in
one of the folders but it didn't take in the others. I have a horrible
feeling that I left that particular folder open and it didn't save the
settings and apply them to the other ones as I opened them. I have now
done it again and it works just fine thanks.

As has been said several times already today, this programme has
surprises round every corner and almost all of them are nice ones too
;-)

--
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/3
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera.

The harder you work the luckier you become.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Greg,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 at 18:04:57[GMT -0600](which was 00:04 where I
live) you wrote:

 Can you change the default column settings? If yes, how?

Yes I can. I right clicked on the toolbar and selected the columns I
wanted.

I think I've found out what I was doing wrong. I didn't shut the
folder that I made the adjustments in so they didn't take in the other
folders I subsequently opened. Now corrected and all working fine
thanks. Can't see the wood for the trees again ;-)

--
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/3
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera.

Power corrupts, but we need electricity



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Greg,

@14-Jan-2003, 18:04 -0600 (00:04 UK time) Greg Strong [GS] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 I have Use the account default column settings enabled for all
 my folders (well, most of them) and have no problem seeing them
 in that consistent format.

GS Can you change the default column settings? If yes, how?

Just change any folder that is configured to be one of those using
the settings. All other folder similarly set will be affected by the
changes.

- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
TB! v1.63 Beta/3 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1rc1-nr1 (Windows 2000)

iD8DBQE+JKqvOeQkq5KdzaARAqiPAJ9MYJH0lYJJLBq8lEGbFzLhM5qmfgCg94ei
QB5tq4Ri/Be5Q2qrJesz02M=
=YfSp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Julian,
On January 14, 2003, 11:09, you wrote:

JBL reality I never used it anyway.  I still use Outlook for my contacts
JBL and diary (I have not got round to finding a suitable replacement that
JBL will work with my Palm), and there is no easy way of synchronising
JBL address book entries, but this is not a major problem.

Try Time and Chaos  http://www.isbister.com/ I use it for a number
of years. It can be synchronized with Palm  (a separate program
available from isbister.cim. Both shareware (try it before buy), not
very expensive, all updates are free. Keeps Appointments, Todo's,
Address book, all linked together. Makes and accept v-cards. etc.

-- 
Peter


Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/3 on Windows 98



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Marck,

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 at 00:26:21[GMT +](which was 00:26 where I
live) you wrote:

 Just change any folder that is configured to be one of those using
 the settings. All other folder similarly set will be affected by the
 changes.

But only when you close the folder in which you made the changes first
as I found out this afternoon. Otherwise you will have to make the
changes in each folder separately as you open it.

--
Best regards,
Richard

| Using The Bat! version 1.63 Beta/3
| Windows 2000 (build 2195), version 5.0 Service Pack 3
| and using the best browser: Opera.

“Happiness is the reward we get for living to the highest right we
know.”



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Dave Gorman
Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 9:57:45 AM, Miguel wrote:

 - I cannot save searches and thus make explorer short cuts to them

 But the Message Finder saves the last 9 searches you have
 done with all conditions (not just the search strings). You can
 re-use any of them by opening the Message Finder and going to
 Edit-Use previous conditions.

Wow! 2 years of TBing for me, and I had no idea this existed!
Thanks Miguel!!

-- 
Dave
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Should I stay or should I go...?

2003-01-14 Thread Mike Alexander
Hello Andy,

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 3:11:56 PM, you wrote:

AH Hello all.

AH OK, assuming you've not filtered out my email completely because I'm
AH using Outlook 2000 :-), I have a question (or two).  I've just found The
AH Bat!, test-installed it (latest as of yesterday, 1.62 is it?), and it
AH looks good, but it seems to me that a move from one email client to
AH another will be a massive investment of my time.

AH 1. Is it worth it? (OK, I know you're all going to say yes!)
AH 2. (for ex-Outlook 2000 users)  Being honest, are there any things that
AH OL 2000 does that you cannot do in TB!, that you miss?

I can't tell you how to do all the things you're asking, because I
haven't used TB for long enough (How long is long enough? How long is
a piece of string  g).

What I can tell you is that I changed from OL/OE two months ago and
I've never regretted it. TB is far better as a dedicated mail client
instead of the how many functions can we cram into it Outlook, and
is more effective than OE.

I still use Outlook as my PIM, but I have no regrets that I no longer
use it for mail.

-- 
Best regards,
 Mike   




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Tmp files

2003-01-14 Thread Mike Alexander
Hello Spike,

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 4:27:30 PM, you wrote:



S Comments?  Suggestions?  These files represent almost half a GB
S of space being used (wasted?).  I run my mailer on a laptop so
S that wherever I go I have ALL my messages, and I need to free
S some space on the system.


.tmp files are created by the by programs for use in the current
session of Windows. The are *temporary* files which should be deleted
by the software. However, software doesn't always handle this well and
sometimes doesn't delete them all. This is most likely when the
software crashes or when you have just installed something (I find
installers are particularly bad at clearing out tmp files.).  .tmp
files are generic and not specific to any program and are a way of,
for example, having a back up of say, a Word document when you are
creating it.  Consequently, the best way to deal with them is to write
a short batch file which either a. deletes all files form that folder
on shutdown, or b. deletes all files in that folder not having the
same date as the current Windows session and using the Windows
Scheduler to run it every week or so.

-- 
Best regards,
 Mike   




Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-14 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
I am having problems with filters for my in-boxes.  I am using the
inbox-known for many of my contacts, but would also like to add a
filter identifying a few with a color group.  The transfer to the
inbox-known works fine, but the color group filters do not.

On the rule tab, the source folder is set as the in box and set to
move them to the inbox-known.  (I had no options available on the
source folder.)  The rule is active, and the string is set for the
sender.  On both the Actions and Advanced tabs I have set the color
group I want for these messages.  On the options tab, I have tried
both checking and unchecking continue processing with other filters.
I have also tried moving the filter ahead of the Known filter and down
to the bottom just in case sequencing was an issue, but there is no
difference.

I'm using TheBat! v.1.62 Christmas. (I'm sing an Interne account to
send, however, because I'm temporarily overseas and cannot send from
the account at which I'm subscribed, in case anyone wonders why TB!
doesn't show up in the headers.)

Obviously I'm missing something. Any advice?

Thanks, Rick



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Richard,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 21:43:03 -0500 GMT (15/01/03, 09:43 +0700 GMT),
Richard H. Stoddard wrote:

 I am having problems with filters for my in-boxes.  I am using the
 inbox-known for many of my contacts, but would also like to add a
 filter identifying a few with a color group.  The transfer to the
 inbox-known works fine, but the color group filters do not.

 On the rule tab, the source folder is set as the in box and set to
 move them to the inbox-known.  (I had no options available on the
 source folder.)  The rule is active, and the string is set for the
 sender.  On both the Actions and Advanced tabs I have set the color
 group I want for these messages.

OK, here is the confusion. Action and Advanced are two different
things. And I am not sure yet which of these you want to achieve.

Actions: This is used in order to set the message to a colour group.

Advanced: This is an additional condition, meaning the filter should
be triggered only if the message already has the colour group.

Pick your choice. I am not sure which one you mean, but certainly it
doesn't make sense to set the message to a colour group if, and only
if, it already has the colour group. ;-)

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Next Sunday a special collection will be taken to defray the cost of
the new carpet. All those wishing to do something on the new carpet
will come forward and do so.

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Biju Nair

Hello Miguel,

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 7:49:55 AM, 

,- [ you wrote ]

MAU Hello Thomas,

 On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 12:15:41 -0800 GMT (31/01/03, 03:15 +0700 GMT),
 Biju Nair wrote:

MAU What planet or galaxy is he writing from that it is already January
MAU 30th? ;-)

'-
Friends  I am composing the mails from the Planet called as
EARTH located in the milky way galaxy.

As 4 the dates.. Well i was just trying to peek in the Future...

Anyways now i am back  ;-)






Regards,
 Biju



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Free anti-trojan/spyware/adware/virus

2003-01-14 Thread M. Evans
In the free (for personal use) anti-trojan category, Backwork:

http://www.framework.nl/backwork/eng/index.html

M.



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: Issue with In-Box Filters

2003-01-14 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Richard,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, at 21:43:03 GMT -0500 (1/14/2003, 8:43 PM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I am having problems with filters for my in-boxes.  I am using the
 inbox-known for many of my contacts, but would also like to add a
 filter identifying a few with a color group.  The transfer to the
 inbox-known works fine, but the color group filters do not.

See Signal strings  Filtering actions in the help file.

Someone else can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think besides the
Known filter you will have to have an additional filter for each color
group. In the Known filter make sure you have Continue processing
with other filters checked.

For each additional filter associated with a color group you would use
the email address as the search string on sender. For each additional
address associated with the same color group go to the Alternatives tab,
and add a set. On the Action tab select and check Set the message's
colour group to.

Good luck!

-- 
Best regards,

Greg Strong 
TB! v1.62 Beta/17 on Windows XP Service Pack 1



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Biju,

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:52:53 -0800 GMT (15/01/03, 23:52 +0700 GMT),
Biju Nair wrote:

 Friends  I am composing the mails from the Planet called as
 EARTH located in the milky way galaxy.

I've heard about that planet. Third rock from the sun?

 As 4 the dates.. Well i was just trying to peek in the Future...

 Anyways now i am back  ;-)

Almost. Your computer is set to the right time, but you are in
GMT+0530 (India). Your computer thinks you are in GMT-0800 (US West
Coast). Therefore, you are still 13h 30mins in the future.

All you need to do now is go to MyComputer / Configuration /
Date and Time / set your time zone to India and click Apply.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.

Ist es nicht merkwuerdig, dass jeden Tag gerade so viel passiert, wie
in die Zeitung passt?

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 
using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html



Re[2]: How to add CC list in forward mails

2003-01-14 Thread Biju Nair

Hello Thomas,

Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 7:35:14 PM, 

,- [ you wrote ]

TF Hello Biju,

TF On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:52:53 -0800 GMT (15/01/03, 23:52 +0700 GMT),
TF Biju Nair wrote:

 Friends  I am composing the mails from the Planet called as
 EARTH located in the milky way galaxy.

TF I've heard about that planet. Third rock from the sun?


Yeah !!! bery bery true ;-)
 As 4 the dates.. Well i was just trying to peek in the Future...

 Anyways now i am back  ;-)

TF Almost. Your computer is set to the right time, but you are in
TF GMT+0530 (India). Your computer thinks you are in GMT-0800 (US West
TF Coast). Therefore, you are still 13h 30mins in the future.

TF All you need to do now is go to MyComputer / Configuration /
TF Date and Time / set your time zone to India and click Apply.

Eeks!!! I hope that now i have landed in your planet n showing the right
time and date...

'-





Regards,
 Biju



Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html