Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid:
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid:
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing
code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid:
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources.
For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Thank you Romain. :)
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
if you need help just ask, once set up it is just adding few missing
code (basically EE-CDI integration as far as i saw)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 17:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
I try. But, it doesn't like me. :(
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
CDI TCKs are just waiting few love ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 16:55 GMT+01:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
:
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list
and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
TomEE code is very simple and extensible, that's the reason :p
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 11:18 GMT+01:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
Roberto,
sometimes I don't believe that Romain is an human.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com;
users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
Hi Roberto.
you are right, will fix it quickly
Le 11 déc. 2014 03:05, Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid
a
écrit :
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton
Resources.
For
what I can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau
rmannibu...@gmail.com
:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit
:
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional
would
work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
This one is fixed :)
I was looking into some other errors, namely:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$singleton/#showFailuresLink
And appears that TomEE is not supporting REST Singleton Resources. For what I
can tell, it's relying on this implementation:
OpenEJBPerRequestPojoResourceProvider, created here
org/apache/openejb/server/cxf/rs/CxfRsHttpListener.java:533
Is this correct?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
It does yes Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : There is only one failing bug with transactions in CloudBees.javaee7-samples. Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ? -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
about @Transactional can be linked to the test:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=blob;f=container/openejb-core/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/cdi/transactional/TransactionScopeTest.java;h=d7f27c072ca1e4e99e418794b238dc7f3e0a871e;hb=ae8f512c5655dfd9024353c5a46340c6de07edf3
ensure the id is static and it should work, otherwise you surely just
read OWB proxy field (instance itself is destroyed).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 22:25 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto asot...@gmail.com:
it can help a bit
https://github.com/jayway/JsonPath/tree/master/json-path-assert
El Thu Dec 04 2014 at 10:21:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau (
rmannibu...@gmail.com) va escriure:
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-
samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,
age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{
age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-
Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-04 19:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work
now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4673135.html
Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev now Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : Hey all, First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. John On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi, Thank you John! I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests. Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev now Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : Hey all, First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. John On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these particular tests but hopefully it will Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, Thank you John! I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests. Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev now Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : Hey all, First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. John On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Great! Kicking out new builds. Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can help / guide me on something? Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these particular tests but hopefully it will Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, Thank you John! I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests. Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev now Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : Hey all, First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. John On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
On CDI entry points are: 1) AnnotationDeployer#getBeanClasses 2) CdiScanner Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-06 10:40 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Great! Kicking out new builds. Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can help / guide me on something? Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these particular tests but hopefully it will Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, Thank you John! I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests. Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev now Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : Hey all, First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. John On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Thanks! I'll have a look. From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@tomitribe.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 11:10 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 On CDI entry points are: 1) AnnotationDeployer#getBeanClasses 2) CdiScanner Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-06 10:40 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Great! Kicking out new builds. Anyway, I'm very interested in contributing with this effort. Maybe you can help / guide me on something? Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these particular tests but hopefully it will Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-06 9:52 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, Thank you John! I just added the dependencies for batch as well in https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/, so that took care of a few missing tests. Now it seems that a lot of tests are failing because there is no beans.xml, since on Java EE 7 the description it's optional. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev now Le jeudi 6 novembre 2014, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : Hey all, First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. John On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : Hi, We got our account back, so
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid: Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hey all, First, cudos to Roberto for taking on the TomEE support! It came to my mind after speaking w/ David @ JavaOne about EE7 status. So quick question. If we put in hibernate in the TomEE profile, that should deploy fine right? I'm not saying for you guys to put it in, but for the sake of the EE sample tests that might help with the JPA 2.1 tests. John On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Great! Thanks, I'll add it in the next run :) From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use tomee-remote with plus classifier configured): dependency groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId artifactIdbatchee-jbatch/artifactId version0.2-incubating/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.johnzon/groupId artifactIdjohnzon-core/artifactId version0.1-incubating/version /dependency Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:55 GMT+00:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: great, thks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 16:51 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com: Ok, Jenkins archiving was killing the machine disk space. I had to delete and create a new job. It's running now and should be accessible on the same url: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID To: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:38 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hello Roberto, is it broken again? I get 404 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-05 11:44 GMT+00:00 Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid : Hi, We got our account back, so the tests are now running in CI with the latest TomEE 2.0 SNAPSHOT: https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/ Cheers, Roberto From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com To: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
On Nov 2, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. Definitely a useful discussion as people are going on what's been documented, which is nothing in this area. For other readers, Romain is correct, we can't ship Hibernate due to licensing restrictions documented here: - http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x see Which licenses may NOT be included within Apache products? We already support/ship EclipseLink, so the question is really about what will happen with OpenJPA. I certainly hope OpenJPA can be brought up to JPA 2.1 compliance. Challenge for the readers is IBM was the main contributor and has simply tired of carrying the load alone: - https://developer.ibm.com/wasdev/2014/05/28/eclipselink-jpa-provider-liberty-profile we agreed it was better to join forces with the EclipseLink open source community than to be the primary (sole) developer in the OpenJPA community. This doesn't mean OpenJPA has to die, it just means if you believe in open source, now is the time to act on those beliefs. Three people in their spare time can do amazing things. -David
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
travis I guess? https://travis-ci.org/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/jobs/39782388 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-03 9:24 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi Romain, Yes, Travis was also setup as a backup plan. Let's see what's going to happen with Cloudbees. Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org Cc: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:41 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 travis I guess? https://travis-ci.org/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/jobs/39782388 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-03 9:24 GMT+01:00 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com: First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi David, Thanks for a warm welcome :) The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are looking into it. Cheers,Roberto From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :) We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track these. What CI are you using? We could set something up on the Apache side if needed. -David On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi David Thanks for the useful info about IBM decision on switching form OpenJPA to Eclipselink from JPA 2.1. I think that's exactly the point. I myself also prefer OpenJPA, but I can understand why IBM wants to stick with eclipselink from now on. [] Leo On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:13 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 2, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. Definitely a useful discussion as people are going on what's been documented, which is nothing in this area. For other readers, Romain is correct, we can't ship Hibernate due to licensing restrictions documented here: - http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x see Which licenses may NOT be included within Apache products? We already support/ship EclipseLink, so the question is really about what will happen with OpenJPA. I certainly hope OpenJPA can be brought up to JPA 2.1 compliance. Challenge for the readers is IBM was the main contributor and has simply tired of carrying the load alone: - https://developer.ibm.com/wasdev/2014/05/28/eclipselink-jpa-provider-liberty-profile we agreed it was better to join forces with the EclipseLink open source community than to be the primary (sole) developer in the OpenJPA community. This doesn't mean OpenJPA has to die, it just means if you believe in open source, now is the time to act on those beliefs. Three people in their spare time can do amazing things. -David
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi While nit running the 2.0 I dont expect them to work. Le 2 nov. 2014 21:39, Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid a écrit : Hi guys, I just subscribed to the list, so this is my first email here. I'm currently contributing to a Java EE 7 samples project here: https://github.com/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples, and I just added profiles to run the samples in TomEE and TomEE Embedded. Running the samples / tests we got the following results: batch - No Implementation Providedcdi - Failing a few tests. Most are related with the absence of a beans.xmlconcurrency - Failing a few tests. DefaultManagedExecutorService not binded to JNDI comp/DefaultManagedExecutorServiceejb - Failure in TimerServiceel - Missing Lambda Supportinterceptor - OKjacc - No Implementation Providedjaspic - No Implementation Providedjavamail - OKjaxrs - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like json-p and jpajaxws - OKjca - OKjms - Test Failuresjpa - No support for JPA 2.1 yetjsf - A few failuresjson-p - OKjta - Failing a few tests. Related with other specs, like jpaservlet - Failing a few tests. Related with security stuffvalidation - Test Failureswebsocket - OK These are only a preliminary results. I intent to look with more detail into the tests to make sure the problems are not in the samples side. Currently most of the test pass on other Java EE 7 servers. I'm also missing a CI build including TomEE. I'm having some issues with our CI environment, but it will be there. Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :) Cheers,Roberto From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com To: users@tomee.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7 Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit : See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA: http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0. I guess the Hibernate LGPL will be the candidate (not bundled in the tomee zip). This decision would speedup the release. Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay apache. Well stay openjpa i think. Btw this kind of discussion is generally useless. You would have had the same about bval...one week of work and we got it. -- View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4672719.html Sent from the TomEE Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi Jesse, Maybe you could contribute that to the project? You just need to create a root JIRA for Java EE 7 and add some subtask to it. Would be great. I can also create a page so that you can contribute a page on the website. Up to you. 2013/6/3 jieryn jie...@gmail.com Greetings, On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7: - CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans - EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB - JPA 2.1 - Apache OpenJPA - JSF 2.2 - Apache MyFaces - Servlet 3.1 - Apache Tomcat - Bean Validation 1.1 - Apache BVal - JAX-RS 2.0 - Apache CXF - JMS 2.0 - Apache ActiveMQ Is there a wiki that captures this? It would probably get a lot of use. Or perhaps a top level tracking issue for Java EE 7 enablement, with links to the dependent projects top level tracking issues for Java EE 7? It's kind of a lot of bookkeeping, but I would expect as Java EE 7 is officially launched, etc, this issue will come up quite a bit. -Jesse -- Jean-Louis
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Will be probably hard to get a JMS 2.0 compliant release from ActiveMQ. It may require additional work to switch to Apollo as it looks to be the product to rely on. JLouis 2013/6/3 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their Java EE 7 compliant versions. Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7: - CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans - EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB - JPA 2.1 - Apache OpenJPA - JSF 2.2 - Apache MyFaces - Servlet 3.1 - Apache Tomcat - Bean Validation 1.1 - Apache BVal - JAX-RS 2.0 - Apache CXF - JMS 2.0 - Apache ActiveMQ Effectively, the what is the timeline question spills over onto them as well making it near impossible for us to actually give an answer. I suspect the ones that will take the longest are JAX-RS 2.0 and JMS 2.0. -David -- Jean-Louis
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Wow, nice response David. A nice list that show impact and new/target versions and even mention of the time line. On Jun 3, 2013 12:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their Java EE 7 compliant versions. Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7: - CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans - EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB - JPA 2.1 - Apache OpenJPA - JSF 2.2 - Apache MyFaces - Servlet 3.1 - Apache Tomcat - Bean Validation 1.1 - Apache BVal - JAX-RS 2.0 - Apache CXF - JMS 2.0 - Apache ActiveMQ Effectively, the what is the timeline question spills over onto them as well making it near impossible for us to actually give an answer. I suspect the ones that will take the longest are JAX-RS 2.0 and JMS 2.0. -David
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Greetings, On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote: Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7: - CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans - EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB - JPA 2.1 - Apache OpenJPA - JSF 2.2 - Apache MyFaces - Servlet 3.1 - Apache Tomcat - Bean Validation 1.1 - Apache BVal - JAX-RS 2.0 - Apache CXF - JMS 2.0 - Apache ActiveMQ Is there a wiki that captures this? It would probably get a lot of use. Or perhaps a top level tracking issue for Java EE 7 enablement, with links to the dependent projects top level tracking issues for Java EE 7? It's kind of a lot of bookkeeping, but I would expect as Java EE 7 is officially launched, etc, this issue will come up quite a bit. -Jesse
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Let me play of the bet game and say jaxrs will be the fastest ;). It is almost already in the box and the easier to integrate (thks cxf). All projects are not linked excepted tomcat and websockets where we have to work at tomee level and not openejb. That s why i see it as the first step in our javaee7 dev. Le 3 juin 2013 06:36, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com a écrit : On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their Java EE 7 compliant versions. Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7: - CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans - EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB - JPA 2.1 - Apache OpenJPA - JSF 2.2 - Apache MyFaces - Servlet 3.1 - Apache Tomcat - Bean Validation 1.1 - Apache BVal - JAX-RS 2.0 - Apache CXF - JMS 2.0 - Apache ActiveMQ Effectively, the what is the timeline question spills over onto them as well making it near impossible for us to actually give an answer. I suspect the ones that will take the longest are JAX-RS 2.0 and JMS 2.0. -David
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Tomee is tomcat so we need at least a tomcat 8 release Le 1 juin 2013 05:13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a écrit : Of course, I saw the following blog post: Introducing Java EE 7: June 12 Kickoff[1] I think I heard some chatter about Java EE 7 on this list sometime recently, but I don't remember what was said. So, what are TomEE's plans for adapting Java EE 7 ? Is Java EE 7 on the schedule after TomEE 1.6.0 is released? Is it in the plans for TomEE to be Java EE 7 compliant/certified, 100% ? [1] https://blogs.oracle.com/java/entry/introducing_java_ee_7
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Understood, thanks Romain and John! On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Once tomcat is here we can branch, before dont even think of it Le 1 juin 2013 12:04, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : I think realistically you need all of the components to bump up to their Java EE 7 compliant versions. On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:16 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Tomee is tomcat so we need at least a tomcat 8 release Le 1 juin 2013 05:13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a écrit : Of course, I saw the following blog post: Introducing Java EE 7: June 12 Kickoff[1] I think I heard some chatter about Java EE 7 on this list sometime recently, but I don't remember what was said. So, what are TomEE's plans for adapting Java EE 7 ? Is Java EE 7 on the schedule after TomEE 1.6.0 is released? Is it in the plans for TomEE to be Java EE 7 compliant/certified, 100% ? [1] https://blogs.oracle.com/java/entry/introducing_java_ee_7
Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Can't wait for JSR 352 Batch Applications for the Java Platform. Looks very much like spring batch which i have used and thought was one of the best spring modules that had no equivalent in jee. -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-plans-for-Java-EE-7-tp4663386p4663402.html Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
