Re: [vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-23 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi,

most - if not all - of your requirements are met by my QMVC
(http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmvc.html).

At 14:14 22.09.04 -0500, you wrote:
Two issues:
1) Using qmail  vpopmail, what methods are available to log all inbound 
and outbound email PER VIRTUAL DOMAIN?

Inbound is trivial, outbound can be done via a 2nd Qmail instance.

2) We also need a way to notify the recipient of an email that contained 
a virus that the infected email was destroyed, and that it came from 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject line of whatever it was.

QMVC allows per-domain specific filter/configuratoin profiles and message
templates.

We have a law firm that wants to record all their communications in both 
directions. We are capturing inbound emails by appending 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to the end of everyones .qmail file. 
What's missing is a way to capture the outbound emails.

Texas courts are currently in the process of requiring attorneys to use 
email to file and update their cases. They are using email as though it 
was a guaranteed delivery mechanism even though we all know it isn't. 
This pilot project is expected to go nationwide soon.

When the courts send out an email containing a virus (they use Windows 
boxes), the normal thing for a receiving MTA's virus checker to do is 
silently throw that email away and not notify anyone. In this case 
however, that email has legal ramifications so that either we have to 
let the infected email pass thru the server, extract only the infected 
portion of the email leaving the rest intact (no idea how to do that), 
or throw it away but notify the recipient of what was done. The subject 
line of these emails contains a case number that could be used as follow 
up by the receiving clerk at the law firm.

We currently use qscanq to call clamav for the heavy lifting, but that 
approach doesn't offer a way to notify anyone of what happened to an 
infected email - at least not any way I know of.

clamav is is natively support by QMVC.

We'd like solutions that have per virtual domain granularity so other 
domains on the box don't have to do things the same way.

With QMVC you have 

- per virtual-domain configuration,
- per virtual-domain processing + logging, archiving of logfiles,
- per virtual-domain analysis, QMVC html'ized logfiles can be make public.

Suggestions?

See above.

regards.
--eh.

Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/
Wiener Weg 8, 50858 Cologne | T: +49 221 484 4923 | F: ...24


Re: [vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-23 Thread Kiril Todorov
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
most - if not all - of your requirements are met by my QMVC
(http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmvc.html).
Inbound is trivial, outbound can be done via a 2nd Qmail instance.
Umm.. Excuse me, but both inbound and outbound logging are already 
covered by stock qmail (http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#copies)

Whatever he will use as a MDA to check if the messages will be actualy 
stored to the logging account or just ignored is his choice, either it 
be procmail/maildrop/qmvc whatever  :)

And simscan 1.0 has support for per-domain avir/spam. yeah.
--
+---+
| Kiril Todorov  +  System::Network Administrator |
+---+
| /* waiting... dreaming... wishing... */   |
+---+


Re: [vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-23 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi,

At 11:43 23.09.04 +0300, you wrote:
Erwin Hoffmann wrote:

 Hi,
 
 most - if not all - of your requirements are met by my QMVC
 (http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmvc.html).
 
 Inbound is trivial, outbound can be done via a 2nd Qmail instance.
 

Umm.. Excuse me, but both inbound and outbound logging are already 
covered by stock qmail (http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#copies)

If you look again at the URL you mentioned and compare it with:

http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/qmvc/qmvclog_20030102.html

you will realize that logging != logging (sorry for the bad math).


Whatever he will use as a MDA to check if the messages will be actualy 
stored to the logging account or just ignored is his choice, either it 
be procmail/maildrop/qmvc whatever  :)

And simscan 1.0 has support for per-domain avir/spam. yeah.

Have to have a lookt at it.

regards.
--eh.


Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | FEHCom | http://www.fehcom.de/
Wiener Weg 8, 50858 Cologne | T: +49 221 484 4923 | F: ...24


Re: [vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-23 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Thank you to all that replied. I'll take a look at qmail-scanner, 
simscan and QMVC as suggested.

In case someone follows this thread in the future, I want to mention 
that I used the technique referenced via  
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#copies successfully for years. Then 
I decided to implement virtual domains via vpopmail, and couldn't make 
it work in the virtual environment, even to a single log for all 
domains. I don't recall all the tests I ran, but I eventually gave up 
trying to make it work. There's no logic that I can find to make it 
support a log per virtual domain in any case.

Because the sender of the infected mails is the Texas Court system, 
normal logic rules don't apply. If the courts have a record of sending a 
particular email, they record it as successfully contacting the 
attorneys for the case. If the receiving MTA trashes that email due to a 
virus, and some court date is missed or document isn't filed as a 
result, the courts are blameless. Therefore, only something that warns 
the recipient (clerk @ attorney's office) is of any value, and that 
warning MUST at a minimum contain the Subject: line as that's the only 
identifier for what case is involved.

If there were a way of eliminating only that portion of the email 
payload that was infected, and allowing the remainder to hit the 
recipients inbox, that would be the best solution. Rebuilding an email 
of only the clean portions isn't something that exists as far as I'm aware.

As an aside, how would you like being on the receiving end of this set 
up? Your case is before the courts, and a virus or anything else 
disrupts the flow of email. You are, in effect, guilty because 
something didn't happen as it should have because the courts have 
declared that email is a guaranteed delivery mechanism. This system is 
coming to your state, as Texas was used as the test site. This idea is 
so bad that foreign governments are also likely to pick it up.

--
Bill Gradwohl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ycc.com
SPAMstomper Protected email


[vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-22 Thread Bill Gradwohl
Two issues:
1) Using qmail  vpopmail, what methods are available to log all inbound 
and outbound email PER VIRTUAL DOMAIN?
2) We also need a way to notify the recipient of an email that contained 
a virus that the infected email was destroyed, and that it came from 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject line of whatever it was.

We have a law firm that wants to record all their communications in both 
directions. We are capturing inbound emails by appending 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to the end of everyones .qmail file. 
What's missing is a way to capture the outbound emails.

Texas courts are currently in the process of requiring attorneys to use 
email to file and update their cases. They are using email as though it 
was a guaranteed delivery mechanism even though we all know it isn't. 
This pilot project is expected to go nationwide soon.

When the courts send out an email containing a virus (they use Windows 
boxes), the normal thing for a receiving MTA's virus checker to do is 
silently throw that email away and not notify anyone. In this case 
however, that email has legal ramifications so that either we have to 
let the infected email pass thru the server, extract only the infected 
portion of the email leaving the rest intact (no idea how to do that), 
or throw it away but notify the recipient of what was done. The subject 
line of these emails contains a case number that could be used as follow 
up by the receiving clerk at the law firm.

We currently use qscanq to call clamav for the heavy lifting, but that 
approach doesn't offer a way to notify anyone of what happened to an 
infected email - at least not any way I know of.

We'd like solutions that have per virtual domain granularity so other 
domains on the box don't have to do things the same way.

Suggestions?
--
Bill Gradwohl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ycc.com



Re: [vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-22 Thread Matthew Walker
qmail-scanner can be configured to notify the sender and the recipient
of the infected email.


On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:14:29 -0500, Bill Gradwohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Two issues:
 1) Using qmail  vpopmail, what methods are available to log all inbound
 and outbound email PER VIRTUAL DOMAIN?
 2) We also need a way to notify the recipient of an email that contained
 a virus that the infected email was destroyed, and that it came from
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject line of whatever it was.
 
 We have a law firm that wants to record all their communications in both
 directions. We are capturing inbound emails by appending
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the end of everyones .qmail file.
 What's missing is a way to capture the outbound emails.
 
 Texas courts are currently in the process of requiring attorneys to use
 email to file and update their cases. They are using email as though it
 was a guaranteed delivery mechanism even though we all know it isn't.
 This pilot project is expected to go nationwide soon.
 
 When the courts send out an email containing a virus (they use Windows
 boxes), the normal thing for a receiving MTA's virus checker to do is
 silently throw that email away and not notify anyone. In this case
 however, that email has legal ramifications so that either we have to
 let the infected email pass thru the server, extract only the infected
 portion of the email leaving the rest intact (no idea how to do that),
 or throw it away but notify the recipient of what was done. The subject
 line of these emails contains a case number that could be used as follow
 up by the receiving clerk at the law firm.
 
 We currently use qscanq to call clamav for the heavy lifting, but that
 approach doesn't offer a way to notify anyone of what happened to an
 infected email - at least not any way I know of.
 
 We'd like solutions that have per virtual domain granularity so other
 domains on the box don't have to do things the same way.
 
 Suggestions?
 
 --
 Bill Gradwohl
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.ycc.com
 



Re: [vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-22 Thread Ken Jones
On Wednesday 22 September 2004 02:14 pm, Bill Gradwohl wrote:
 Two issues:
 1) Using qmail  vpopmail, what methods are available to log all inbound
 and outbound email PER VIRTUAL DOMAIN?
 2) We also need a way to notify the recipient of an email that contained
 a virus that the infected email was destroyed, and that it came from
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject line of whatever it was.

 We have a law firm that wants to record all their communications in both
 directions. We are capturing inbound emails by appending
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the end of everyones .qmail file.
 What's missing is a way to capture the outbound emails.

 Texas courts are currently in the process of requiring attorneys to use
 email to file and update their cases. They are using email as though it
 was a guaranteed delivery mechanism even though we all know it isn't.
 This pilot project is expected to go nationwide soon.

 When the courts send out an email containing a virus (they use Windows
 boxes), the normal thing for a receiving MTA's virus checker to do is
 silently throw that email away and not notify anyone. In this case
 however, that email has legal ramifications so that either we have to
 let the infected email pass thru the server, extract only the infected
 portion of the email leaving the rest intact (no idea how to do that),
 or throw it away but notify the recipient of what was done. The subject
 line of these emails contains a case number that could be used as follow
 up by the receiving clerk at the law firm.

 We currently use qscanq to call clamav for the heavy lifting, but that
 approach doesn't offer a way to notify anyone of what happened to an
 infected email - at least not any way I know of.

 We'd like solutions that have per virtual domain granularity so other
 domains on the box don't have to do things the same way.

 Suggestions?

simscan might be able to do it. It has per domain support for clamav
and spamassassin. A virus causes clamav-simscan-qmail-smtpd to
tell the sender MTA to send a bounce message back to the sender with a virus 
warning message. This is via the standard smtp protocol.

simscan would need some clean message code to send through the de-infected
message. ripmime will rip the message, if there is an un-rip message program 
we could problaby write the code.

We also might be able to cobble up some code to email a report to someone.

Ken Jones
Ken Jones


Re: [vchkpw] Log all email per domain antivirus that notifies recipients

2004-09-22 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 22 September 2004 02:14 pm, Bill Gradwohl wrote:
 Two issues:
 1) Using qmail  vpopmail, what methods are available to log all inbound
 and outbound email PER VIRTUAL DOMAIN?

http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#copies

 2) We also need a way to notify the recipient of an email that contained
 a virus that the infected email was destroyed, and that it came from
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject line of whatever it was.
[snip]
 When the courts send out an email containing a virus [...]

This never happens.

However, qmail-scanner can be configured for different notifications.  I, 
personally, use --notify admin, and the admin address is a virus notification 
dropbox that I check occasionally.  If you're using qmail-scanner, I highly 
recommend to NOT notify anyone other than 'admin'.. because if you notify the 
sender, you're just spamming an innocent party, and if you notify the 
recipient, since they have little to no knowledge about how internet mail 
works, they might freak out and think that someone has stolen their email 
address or whatnot.  Things such as virus notifications are best left to 
those with a clue.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
   GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ scriptkitchen.com/kitchen.asc


pgpc51TYLvJAl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote:
  I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? 
  Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for 
  scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
 
 I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our
 SpamAssassin installation.
 
 You can run:
 
 cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D

you should be using spamc and not spamassassin.

spamd/spamc is a much better combination, especially on heavily loaded
servers.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen
Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kitchen @ #qmail on EFNet - Join the party!
.
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
www.inter7.com
866.528.3530 toll free
847.492.0470 int'l
847.492.0632 fax
GNUPG key ID: 93BDD6CE



RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-28 Thread Tom Walsh
 On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:57, Tom Walsh wrote:
   I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ?
   Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for 
   scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
  
  I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning 
 performance of our 
  SpamAssassin installation.
  
  You can run:
  
  cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D
 
 you should be using spamc and not spamassassin.
 
 spamd/spamc is a much better combination, especially on 
 heavily loaded servers.

Jeremy,

While you are completely right spamc/spamd are a better combination for
performance, there are no debugging abilities in spamc/spamd where as
there are many debugging functionalities in the standalone spamassassin
script.

The purpose of my example was to help troubleshoot a slow spamassassin
installation, not to provide a working solution to the problem.

I stand by the fact that running spamassassin with the -D comamndline
switch is an effective method of testing spamassassin and the various
checks that SA performs.

Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/




Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-28 Thread Mark Woodson
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 08:07 am, Tom Walsh wrote:
[snip]
   You can run:
  
   cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D
 
  you should be using spamc and not spamassassin.
 
  spamd/spamc is a much better combination, especially on
  heavily loaded servers.

 Jeremy,

 While you are completely right spamc/spamd are a better combination
 for performance, there are no debugging abilities in spamc/spamd
 where as there are many debugging functionalities in the standalone
 spamassassin script.

 The purpose of my example was to help troubleshoot a slow
 spamassassin installation, not to provide a working solution to the
 problem.

 I stand by the fact that running spamassassin with the -D
 comamndline switch is an effective method of testing spamassassin
 and the various checks that SA performs.

While that is certainly true, telling spamd to run in the foreground 
(not adding -d), and to turn on debugging -D is an option, and I'm 
not sure that it differs at all from running spamassassin -D.

From man spamd:

NAME
   spamd - daemonized version of spamassassin

SYNOPSIS
   spamd [options]

   Options:

[snip]
-d, --daemonizeDaemonize
[snip]
-D, --debugPrint debugging messages
[snip]

-Mark



RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-27 Thread Tom Walsh
 If anybody is interested in some of the performance tweaks 
 we have made 
 to SA, please let me know.

Due to the response I got from this post... I have created a down and
dirty SA config page...

Please keep in mind these are only configuration tweaks... Not actually
changes to the SA software.

As always SA is limited by your CPU first, Memory second, and network
connection third.

Anyways here are the tweaks web page:

http://www.expresshosting.net/howto/sa.html

Tom Walsh




[vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-26 Thread knom
Hi people !

I want to install Spamassassin and Clam Antivirus with vpopmail !
Do you suggest any high speed scanning tool ?

I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? Meanwhile.. My
Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for scanning one message.
Is this the normal duration ?

My homegrown Mailserver uses vpopmail/qmail and has about 200 Mails per
day :)

Thanks very much,
knom.




Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-26 Thread Ken Jones
On Monday 26 January 2004 3:22 pm, knom wrote:
 Hi people !

 I want to install Spamassassin and Clam Antivirus with vpopmail !
 Do you suggest any high speed scanning tool ?

 I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? Meanwhile.. My
 Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for scanning one message.
 Is this the normal duration ?

 My homegrown Mailserver uses vpopmail/qmail and has about 200 Mails per
 day :)

 Thanks very much,
 knom.

I just tested qscanq about 1 hour ago and it's working great.
Written in C. 

http://budney.homeunix.net:8080/users/budney/software/qscanq/index.html

You can configure it the use clamdscan. Works great.

Ken Jones



RE: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-26 Thread Tom Walsh
 I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? 
 Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for 
 scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?

I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our
SpamAssassin installation.

You can run:

cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D

Review the output of this command to determine which processes are
taking so long.

More than likely you are making DNS calls to RBLs that aren't responding
in a timely fashion or are using another service (pyzor, which we have
had disabled since December) that is slow to return a response.

With proper tuning your SpamAssassin can be made to scan messages in
under .6 seconds with a full battary of external tests. (This is even on
a 1GHz 512MB AMD Athlon machine.)

If anybody is interested in some of the performance tweaks we have made
to SA, please let me know.

Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/





Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-26 Thread X-Istence
Tom Walsh wrote:

I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? 
Meanwhile.. My Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for 
scanning one message. Is this the normal duration ?
   

I use a known spam message as a test bed for tuning performance of our
SpamAssassin installation.
You can run:

cat /path/to/known/spam/message | spamassassin -D

Review the output of this command to determine which processes are
taking so long.
More than likely you are making DNS calls to RBLs that aren't responding
in a timely fashion or are using another service (pyzor, which we have
had disabled since December) that is slow to return a response.
With proper tuning your SpamAssassin can be made to scan messages in
under .6 seconds with a full battary of external tests. (This is even on
a 1GHz 512MB AMD Athlon machine.)
If anybody is interested in some of the performance tweaks we have made
to SA, please let me know.
Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/
 

I would be interested in that. I have been looking at ways to speed up 
SA's working speed.

X-Istence


Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin + Clamav Antivirus + vpopmail

2004-01-26 Thread Alex Martin
Hello,

qmail-scanner-queue.pl runs spamassassin, razor2, pyzor, clamav, and its 
own internal scanner, as well as doing rbl lookups, in under 1 second 
per message, usually about .8 seconds for me.

The 10 second delay as someone pointed out is the default timeout for 
rbl lookups.

I had this problem and I recently groomed my rblsmtpd list. I was using 
servers that were down.

The following list may use some services that are a little agressive, 
though I now have no (known) issues with valid mails being bounced, but 
in combination with spamassassin, as well as an address known to many 
spammers (used to get 80+ per day), a few spams make it into my inbox 
per week.

More info about these hosts can be found through their websites.

Also, by following /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current, you can follow 
rblsmtpd's actions, for debugging, etc.

FYI: (live, fast responding rbl hosts as of  1/26/03)

snip
/usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd \
-r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org \
-r blackholes.mail-abuse.org \
-r list.dsbl.org \
-r bl.spamcop.net  \
-r relays.ordb.org \
-r dnsbl.ahbl.org \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
snip
Regards,

Alex Martin
http://www.rettc.com


knom wrote:

Hi people !

I want to install Spamassassin and Clam Antivirus with vpopmail !
Do you suggest any high speed scanning tool ?
I know qmail-scanner.pl, but is this a fast method ? Meanwhile.. My
Spamassassin needs aproximately 10 seconds for scanning one message.
Is this the normal duration ?
My homegrown Mailserver uses vpopmail/qmail and has about 200 Mails per
day :)
Thanks very much,
knom.
 




[vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail

2003-09-14 Thread Tanmaya Anand



hi all,

I have qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail on my 
server.
i have downloaded panda antivirus for linux(Which 
is free ;-))
i want that all the mails should be scanned by the 
server.
Also, i want the vpopmail to have an option of 
online scan 
of attachments.

Does any one has similiar experience. Also, if 
anyone knows any 
other antivirus software for linux which is free to 
use  can be updated,
plz do mail me abt the same.

Thanks in advance 
Tanmaya


Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail

2003-09-14 Thread Tanmaya Anand
hi

Does ClamAV provides updated virus definitions for new viruses?

Regards,
Tanmaya
- Original Message - 
From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tanmaya Anand [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail


 Hi,

 ClamAV - http://clamav.sourceforge.net/
 Qmail-Scanner - http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/

 Oh and Panda is not free, or at least I do not see a free version on
 their website.

 Regards,

 Rick

 Tanmaya Anand wrote:

  hi all,
 
  I have qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail on my server.
  i have downloaded panda antivirus for linux(Which is free ;-))
  i want that all the mails should be scanned by the server.
  Also, i want the vpopmail to have an option of online scan
  of attachments.
 
  Does any one has similiar experience. Also, if anyone knows any
  other antivirus software for linux which is free to use  can be
updated,
  plz do mail me abt the same.
 
  Thanks in advance
  Tanmaya







Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail

2003-09-14 Thread QmailHELP
Yes,
here is the link for the freeware linux version:
http://www.pandasoftware.es/es/linux/linuxdown.asp

Damn, I've just realized it was in spanishif anyone need help with it
click on Acepto el acuerdo de licencia helps :)


- Original Message -
From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tanmaya Anand [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail


 Hi,

 ClamAV - http://clamav.sourceforge.net/
 Qmail-Scanner - http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/

 Oh and Panda is not free, or at least I do not see a free version on
 their website.

 Regards,

 Rick

 Tanmaya Anand wrote:

  hi all,
 
  I have qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail on my server.
  i have downloaded panda antivirus for linux(Which is free ;-))
  i want that all the mails should be scanned by the server.
  Also, i want the vpopmail to have an option of online scan
  of attachments.
 
  Does any one has similiar experience. Also, if anyone knows any
  other antivirus software for linux which is free to use  can be
updated,
  plz do mail me abt the same.
 
  Thanks in advance
  Tanmaya







RE: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail

2003-09-14 Thread Shane Chrisp
They sure do.

Shane

-Original Message-
From: Tanmaya Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, 15 September 2003 12:06 AM
To: Rick Macdougall; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail


hi

Does ClamAV provides updated virus definitions for new viruses?

Regards,
Tanmaya
- Original Message - 
From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tanmaya Anand [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail


 Hi,

 ClamAV - http://clamav.sourceforge.net/
 Qmail-Scanner - http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/

 Oh and Panda is not free, or at least I do not see a free version on
 their website.

 Regards,

 Rick

 Tanmaya Anand wrote:

  hi all,
 
  I have qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail on my server.
  i have downloaded panda antivirus for linux(Which is free ;-))
  i want that all the mails should be scanned by the server.
  Also, i want the vpopmail to have an option of online scan
  of attachments.
 
  Does any one has similiar experience. Also, if anyone knows any
  other antivirus software for linux which is free to use  can be
updated,
  plz do mail me abt the same.
 
  Thanks in advance
  Tanmaya











Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail

2003-09-14 Thread Trey Nolen
 If anyone is interested...even though this is offtopicthe english link
is here:
http://www.pandasoftware.com/download/linux/linux.asp

Trey

 Yes,
 here is the link for the freeware linux version:
 http://www.pandasoftware.es/es/linux/linuxdown.asp

 Damn, I've just realized it was in spanishif anyone need help with it
 click on Acepto el acuerdo de licencia helps :)


 - Original Message -
 From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Tanmaya Anand [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 5:48 PM
 Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Panda Antivirus + qmail


  Hi,
 
  ClamAV - http://clamav.sourceforge.net/
  Qmail-Scanner - http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
 
  Oh and Panda is not free, or at least I do not see a free version on
  their website.
 
  Regards,
 
  Rick
 
  Tanmaya Anand wrote:
 
   hi all,
  
   I have qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail on my server.
   i have downloaded panda antivirus for linux(Which is free ;-))
   i want that all the mails should be scanned by the server.
   Also, i want the vpopmail to have an option of online scan
   of attachments.
  
   Does any one has similiar experience. Also, if anyone knows any
   other antivirus software for linux which is free to use  can be
 updated,
   plz do mail me abt the same.
  
   Thanks in advance
   Tanmaya
 
 
 








Re: [vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Cream[DONut]
www.messagewall.org i use it as mail relay, and its very good, it has basic 
spam filter, and nativly reads openantivirus definition files. (check out 
the MW faq for AV updates, as openantivirus is a bit slow, MW hourly 
compiles a combined definition file from OpenAntivirus and ClamAV's databases)

Regards
Kris
At 03:37 PM 6/11/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi guys, do anyone know a good antivirus scanner that can be installed on 
linux
but not directly in the machine with the email server? and that works with
qmail+vpopmail?

eg:

Firewall---Antivirus Mail scanner---Qmail+Vpopmail Mailserver

Thanks again

--
Cream[DONut] - www.donut.dk
www.nethouse2000.dk - admin



Re: [vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Guillermo Villasana Cardoza
Thanks to everyone, I will check all the options. 

Your help is always appreciated :)

My configuration of the qmail-scanner is in the same machine, I wasn't aware it
could be separated too... still my boss wants something more.

Take care everyone.



[vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Guillermo Villasana Cardoza
Hi guys, do anyone know a good antivirus scanner that can be installed on linux
but not directly in the machine with the email server? and that works with
qmail+vpopmail?

eg:


Firewall---Antivirus Mail scanner---Qmail+Vpopmail Mailserver

Thanks again


-- 



Re: [vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Ron Culler
Qmail-Scanner works well and gives you the ability to incorporate SPAM
filtering


On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 11:37, Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:
 Hi guys, do anyone know a good antivirus scanner that can be installed on linux
 but not directly in the machine with the email server? and that works with
 qmail+vpopmail?
 
 eg:
 
 
 Firewall---Antivirus Mail scanner---Qmail+Vpopmail Mailserver
 
 Thanks again
-- 
Ron Culler





Re: [vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Guillermo Villasana Cardoza
Yes I know that, but I do need to have the scanner in one machine and the mail
program in another, and qmail-scanner although it does stop a lot of virus, it
is not enough for me. (which by the way I am also using)

I have seen the bitdefender, has anyone used that one? or also I have seen the
panda software. Still I am not sure that panda works with qmail.

Thanks

 Qmail-Scanner works well and gives you the ability to incorporate SPAM
 filtering
 
 
 On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 11:37, Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:
  Hi guys, do anyone know a good antivirus scanner that can be installed on
linux
  but not directly in the machine with the email server? and that works with
  qmail+vpopmail?
  
  eg:
  
  
  Firewall---Antivirus Mail scanner---Qmail+Vpopmail Mailserver
  
  Thanks again
 -- 
 Ron Culler
 
 
 
 




Re: [vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Trey Nolen
Don't know if it would work for you, but we use qmail-scanner to call
spamd/spamc for the spam tagging and have the spamd run on another machine.
For the virus scanning, it calls sophie (which uses the Sophos engine) and
it also supports networking, so we run it on another machine.


Trey Nolen



 Yes I know that, but I do need to have the scanner in one machine and the
mail
 program in another, and qmail-scanner although it does stop a lot of
virus, it
 is not enough for me. (which by the way I am also using)

 I have seen the bitdefender, has anyone used that one? or also I have seen
the
 panda software. Still I am not sure that panda works with qmail.

 Thanks

  Qmail-Scanner works well and gives you the ability to incorporate SPAM
  filtering
 
 
  On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 11:37, Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:
   Hi guys, do anyone know a good antivirus scanner that can be installed
on
 linux
   but not directly in the machine with the email server? and that works
with
   qmail+vpopmail?
  
   eg:
  
  
   Firewall---Antivirus Mail scanner---Qmail+Vpopmail Mailserver
  
   Thanks again
  -- 
  Ron Culler
 
 
 
 








Re: [vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi,

Clamav works great with QS and that is what we are using on our mail 
servers.  http://clamav.elektrapro.com/

Regards,

Rick

Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:

Yes I know that, but I do need to have the scanner in one machine and the mail
program in another, and qmail-scanner although it does stop a lot of virus, it
is not enough for me. (which by the way I am also using)


I have seen the bitdefender, has anyone used that one? or also I have seen the
panda software. Still I am not sure that panda works with qmail.


Thanks




Qmail-Scanner works well and gives you the ability to incorporate SPAM


filtering




On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 11:37, Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:


Hi guys, do anyone know a good antivirus scanner that can be installed on
linux


but not directly in the machine with the email server? and that works with


qmail+vpopmail?



eg:




Firewall---Antivirus Mail scanner---Qmail+Vpopmail Mailserver



Thanks again


--


Ron Culler













Re: [vchkpw] Antivirus Scanner

2003-06-11 Thread Dave Richardson - Lists
You can run an Anti-Virus and Anti-Spam gateway with a lower MX value 
than your real mail server.
The gateway filters, cleans, and deals with bounces.  Good mail is 
passed onto your mail server.
You can have multiple gateways at the same MX if you _really_ need to.

qmail-scanner with clam-av and spamassassin is a nice combo that has 
also been well documented.

Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:

Yes I know that, but I do need to have the scanner in one machine and the mail
program in another, and qmail-scanner although it does stop a lot of virus, it
is not enough for me. (which by the way I am also using)
I have seen the bitdefender, has anyone used that one? or also I have seen the
panda software. Still I am not sure that panda works with qmail.
Thanks

 

Qmail-Scanner works well and gives you the ability to incorporate SPAM
filtering
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 11:37, Guillermo Villasana Cardoza wrote:
   

Hi guys, do anyone know a good antivirus scanner that can be installed on
 

linux
 

but not directly in the machine with the email server? and that works with
qmail+vpopmail?
eg:

Firewall---Antivirus Mail scanner---Qmail+Vpopmail Mailserver

Thanks again
 

--
Ron Culler


   



 






antivirus + vadduser

2001-10-25 Thread adhitiyo k

how to install antivirus ... i already install amavis and change qmail-local
and qmail-remote with scanmails , but i can't send email :(  anybody can
tell me how to install amavis on qmail+vpopmail ?
how to execute vadduser with account nobody ? because i want to run adduser
via web with php

thank in advanced

./tio




Re: antivirus + vadduser

2001-10-25 Thread Bill Shupp


On Thursday, October 25, 2001, at 09:07 PM, adhitiyo k wrote:

 how to install antivirus ... i already install amavis and change 
 qmail-local
 and qmail-remote with scanmails , but i can't send email :(  anybody can
 tell me how to install amavis on qmail+vpopmail ?
 how to execute vadduser with account nobody ? because i want to run 
 adduser
 via web with php

I don't know about amavis.. but there are very straightforward 
instructions for using qmail-scanner here:

http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net

Many people on this list use it successfully with qmail.

Cheers,

Bill Shupp




Re: antivirus server software

2001-10-03 Thread Vladimir Kabanov

  What virus scanner app do you use, then? And on what OS? (I think
  the only one which is any good on FreeBSD would be Kaspersky AVP).
  The Linux version appears to have a demo (which only scans, but
  that would
  be enough on a server, but for FreeBSD, there doesn't seem to be
  any demo ;-)

oh, I should note that also DrWEB also works on Linux  FreeBSD.

At least, I'm now using it on FreeBSD  --  results good enough.
Price about $500 / year.





Antivirus scanning ~vpopmail/domains/xxx.com/$USER/Maildir/new/*

2001-09-12 Thread zyrtaf

Hi,
I am looking for an easy-to-use Antivirus for qmail running vpopmail. I
would like to scan mails stored in user's Maildir's.
Thank you





Re: Antivirus scanning ~vpopmail/domains/xxx.com/$USER/Maildir/new/*

2001-09-12 Thread Florent

Hi,

Try qmail-queue-scanner, it will scan mails (in addition to a virus scanner) before 
they reach the maildir's, which is more secure.

Florent

#-Hi,
#-I am looking for an easy-to-use Antivirus for qmail running vpopmail. I
#-would like to scan mails stored in user's Maildir's.
#-Thank you
#-
#-
#-



Re: Antivirus scanning ~vpopmail/domains/xxx.com/$USER/Maildir/new/*

2001-09-12 Thread vol

We're working on a filtering/virus scanning solution as we speak.
We believe it will be available Jan/Feb as a stable release.

Development is at http://www.inter7.com/eps.  The filtering/scanning
code has not been added to the development release just yet.

zyrtaf wrote:
 
 Hi,
 I am looking for an easy-to-use Antivirus for qmail running vpopmail. I
 would like to scan mails stored in user's Maildir's.
 Thank you

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
www.inter7.coom - 847-492-0470
Prices at http://www.inter7.com/prices



qmail-queue patch for Kaspersky Antivirus

2001-07-29 Thread Ondej Sur


I thought somebody could be interested in this.  And don't forget to allow
scanning /var/qmail/queue in defUnix.prf.  You don't have to recompile
anything but qmail-queue for scanning, (if you don't need more friedly error
message known viruses found) I hope somebody will find it usefull.
Copyright on avp-client.c is unknown since I heavily ripped
AvpDaemonClient.c example in AVP distribution which is without any
copyright explicitly written (I could rewrite it from scratch in case
somebody will need it ;-).

O.



// Program to test daemon scanning.
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include string.h
#include unistd.h
#include sys/stat.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
#include sys/un.h// struct sockaddr_un 
#include sys/file.h
#include time.h
#include stdarg.h
#include paths.h
#include errno.h

// ... Cfg pathnames 
#define AVP_NODE_DIR  /var/run
#define AVP_NODE_DIR_MODE 0777
#define AVP_NODE_PID  AVP_NODE_DIR /AvpPid
#define AVP_NODE_LOG  AVP_NODE_DIR /AvpLog
#define AVP_NODE_CTL  AVP_NODE_DIR /AvpCtl\0\0\0
char *NodePid=AVP_NODE_PID;
char *NodeCtl=AVP_NODE_CTL;

static int  AvpFile=-1;

struct sockaddr_un AvpAddr;

int AvpConnect(void) {
	if(AvpFile==-1)
	{
		bzero((char *)AvpAddr,sizeof(AvpAddr));
		AvpAddr.sun_family=AF_UNIX;
		strcpy(AvpAddr.sun_path,NodeCtl);
		if((AvpFile=socket(AF_UNIX,SOCK_STREAM,0))0)
			return -1;
	}
	
	if(AvpFile!=-1  connect(AvpFile,(struct sockaddr *)(AvpAddr),sizeof(AvpAddr.sun_family)+strlen(NodeCtl))=0) {
		return 0;
	}
	return -1;
}

void AvpClose(void) {
	(void)close(AvpFile);
	AvpFile=-1;
}

int AvpScan(const char *file)
{
	char buftoscan[2048];
	time_t now;
	long uintbuf=0; 
	int len;

	// build the message 
	(void)time(now);
	len = snprintf(buftoscan, 2047, 0%.15s:%s, ctime(now)+4, file);

	if(write(AvpFile,buftoscan,len+1)=0)
	{
		if(read(AvpFile,(char*)uintbuf,2) == -1) return -2;
		return (uintbuf0xff)-0x30;
	}
	return -1;
}


--- /usr/home/ondrej/Projects/qmail/qmail-1.03/Makefile	Tue May  8 15:29:43 2001
+++ /usr/home/ondrej/Projects/qmail/qmail-queue-avp/Makefile	Sun Jul 29 15:24:05 2001
@@ -1446,10 +1446,10 @@
 	nroff -man qmail-qstat.8  qmail-qstat.0
 
 qmail-queue: \
-load qmail-queue.o triggerpull.o fmtqfn.o now.o date822fmt.o \
+load qmail-queue.o avp-client.o triggerpull.o fmtqfn.o now.o date822fmt.o \
 datetime.a seek.a ndelay.a open.a sig.a alloc.a substdio.a error.a \
 str.a fs.a auto_qmail.o auto_split.o auto_uids.o
-	./load qmail-queue triggerpull.o fmtqfn.o now.o \
+	./load qmail-queue avp-client.o triggerpull.o fmtqfn.o now.o \
 	date822fmt.o datetime.a seek.a ndelay.a open.a sig.a \
 	alloc.a substdio.a error.a str.a fs.a auto_qmail.o \
 	auto_split.o auto_uids.o 
@@ -1463,6 +1463,10 @@
 alloc.h substdio.h datetime.h now.h datetime.h triggerpull.h extra.h \
 auto_qmail.h auto_uids.h date822fmt.h fmtqfn.h
 	./compile qmail-queue.c
+
+avp-client.o: \
+compile avp-client.c
+	./compile avp-client.c
 
 qmail-queue-log: \
 load qmail-queue-log.o triggerpull.o fmtqfn.o now.o date822fmt.o \
--- qmail.c~	Sun Jul 29 16:13:34 2001
+++ qmail.c	Sun Jul 29 16:07:30 2001
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
 case 115: /* compatibility */
 case 11: return Denvelope address too long for qq (#5.1.3);
 case 31: return Dmail server permanently rejected message (#5.3.0);
+	case 32: return Dknown viruses were found (#5.3.0);
 case 51: return Zqq out of memory (#4.3.0);
 case 52: return Zqq timeout (#4.3.0);
 case 53: return Zqq write error or disk full (#4.3.0);
--- /usr/home/ondrej/Projects/qmail/qmail-1.03/qmail-queue.c	Tue Nov 21 00:44:57 2000
+++ /usr/home/ondrej/Projects/qmail/qmail-queue-avp/qmail-queue.c	Sun Jul 29 16:12:02 2001
@@ -36,10 +36,13 @@
 char *messfn;
 char *todofn;
 char *intdfn;
+char *scanfn;
+int scanlen;
 int messfd;
 int intdfd;
 int flagmademess = 0;
 int flagmadeintd = 0;
+int scanres;
 
 void cleanup()
 {
@@ -58,6 +61,7 @@
 void die(e) int e; { _exit(e); }
 void die_write() { cleanup(); die(53); }
 void die_read() { cleanup(); die(54); }
+void die_virus() { cleanup(); die(32); }
 void sigalrm() { /* thou shalt not clean up here */ die(52); }
 void sigbug() { die(81); }
 
@@ -202,6 +206,16 @@
 
  if (substdio_flush(ssout) == -1) die_write();
  if (fsync(messfd) == -1) die_write();
+
+ if (AvpConnect() == 0) // Pokud se neprikonektime, budeme to tise ignorovat
+  {
+   scanlen = strlen(auto_qmail)+strlen(messfn)+8;
+   scanfn = alloc(scanlen);
+   snprintf(scanfn, scanlen, %s/%s/%s, auto_qmail, queue, messfn);
+   if ((scanres = AvpScan(scanfn)) != 0) die_virus();
+   alloc_free(scanfn);
+   AvpClose();
+  }
 
  intdfd = open_excl(intdfn);
  if (intdfd == -1) die(65);



-- 
Ondej Sur [EMAIL PROTECTED]Globe Internet s.r.o. http://globe.cz/
Tel: +420235365000   Fax: +420235365009 Plnikova 1, 162 00 Praha 6
GPG fingerprint:  CC91 8F02 8CDE 911A 933F  AE52 F4E6 6A7C C20D F273



Re: Antivirus

2001-05-03 Thread Ondej Sur

Kris von Mach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Ondrej,
 
 I use AVP from kaspersky's lab as well with vpopmail and qmail. But I
 didn't need a patch to accomplish this. They have included a qmail-queue
 daemon, in the package.

I was never really able to make supplied qmail-queue to work.  And it
seemed to me that this is not only my problem, so I wrote mine.

 What does this patch do? Does it replace the daemon they include?

Yes, it replace theirs qmail-queue program.  It is quite simple, but it
works ;-) (at least for me).  Thouse shell (perl, shell etc.) scripts using
external scanners was too much to handle (we are handling about 5k domains
with 20k+ mailboxes) and system was heavily overloaded, after using this
patch (it is not so configurable etc.) system is ok.

This patch will connect between linking file from tmp/ to new/, check the
file (via socket) and in case it found infection, it will delete message
and bounce it back (recepient is not notified).

-- 
Ondej Sur [EMAIL PROTECTED]Globe Internet s.r.o. http://globe.cz/
Tel: +420235365000   Fax: +420235365009 Plnikova 1, 162 00 Praha 6
GPG fingerprint:  CC91 8F02 8CDE 911A 933F  AE52 F4E6 6A7C C20D F273



Re: Antivirus

2001-05-02 Thread Kris von Mach

Ondrej,

I use AVP from kaspersky's lab as well with vpopmail and qmail. But I 
didn't need a patch to accomplish this. They have included a qmail-queue 
daemon, in the package.

What does this patch do? Does it replace the daemon they include?

__
Kris.

At 06:00 PM 5/2/2001 +0200, you wrote:

file://c:\eudora-dev\attach\Untitled.ems 
0880.00022f2a564.jpgfile://c:\eudora-dev\attach\Untitled.ems 
0880.0002 Untitled.ems


--
Ondøej Surý [EMAIL PROTECTED] Globe Internet s.r.o. http://globe.cz/
Tel: +420235365000   Fax: +420235365009 Plánièkova 1, 162 00 Praha 6
GPG fingerprint:  CC91 8F02 8CDE 911A 933F  AE52 F4E6 6A7C C20D F273

attachment: 2f2a564.jpg


Antivirus

2001-04-05 Thread Dimitri SZAJMAN

Hi,
I am looking for a good antivirus, working with vpopmail,maildir,...
I saw some but I think they only work with ~/Mailbox
Any URL would be really apreciated
thanks




Re: Antivirus

2001-04-05 Thread Roman Serbski

http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/


Ciao,
Roman Serbski 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: "Dimitri SZAJMAN" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:42 PM
Subject: Antivirus


 Hi,
 I am looking for a good antivirus, working with vpopmail,maildir,...
 I saw some but I think they only work with ~/Mailbox
 Any URL would be really apreciated
 thanks
 




antivirus

2001-03-23 Thread Ciprian Iftode

Hi,
Do you know an antivirus that will work with qmail in order to
scan all the emails that are going thru my server, incoming and outgoing.
10x


Ciprian Iftode,

Professional Systems Romania
str. Moara de Foc, nr.35, et.5, Iasi, 6600
tel/fax: +40-32-219907





AntiVirus

2000-12-01 Thread Visar Emini

Hi everybody...

I have qmail  vpopmail running on Linux machine and I was thinking on
installing an antivirus on my mailserver, does anyone have any suggestions
about this issue?!

Thanks for your time

V.




Re: AntiVirus

2000-12-01 Thread Dan Phoenix


anomy-sanitizer-1.28.tar.gz

look for that...it is free.




On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Visar Emini wrote:

 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:47:49 +0100
 From: Visar Emini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: AntiVirus
 
 Hi everybody...
 
 I have qmail  vpopmail running on Linux machine and I was thinking on
 installing an antivirus on my mailserver, does anyone have any suggestions
 about this issue?!
 
 Thanks for your time
 
 V.