Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Al Sparber

From: "Paul Dwyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Wierd...

killed half my own post with a bracket  :)

The rest should read "validates once it is removed".


much appreciated :-)

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Paul Dwyer
Wierd...

killed half my own post with a bracket  :)

The rest should read "validates once it is removed".

—pd—


Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Paul Dwyer
Little typo just before the  there Al:
 an extra [ lang="en"
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Michael Nelson
Ric Raftis wrote:It was interesting reading your post James because it seems that TAFEs 
across the country may vary widely despite courses supposedly being 
drawn from a national based syllabus and providing national 
accreditation.
Related to this, I reckon one of the biggest problems causing a lack of standards in Web design education is a lack of collaboration. Each facilitator/lecturor is re-inventing the wheel with activities and resources largely due to IP restrictions within their workplace. In reality, many facilitators just end up re-using the same resources that's been used for the last 5 years because on their own they don't have time to update both their own skills and the resources they use.
The ironic thing is that (nearly) all the best info on Web Design topics is being shared freely by professional designers on their blogs/sites! ... I mean, with excellent sites like 

http://webdesignfromscratch.com/ and http://maxdesign.com.au/ published by professionals, what is the role of an educator?
My take is that if lecturors and facilitators were able to collaboratively create and update flexible learning pathways from all the great free stuff out there, we'd be in a better position to help the uptake of standards in Web design education.
(Plug) : 'cause of this, I've started setting up a WebDesign Wikibook over at: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Web_Design
 Really it's just ordering and grouping all the great resources out there created by you professionals into some sort of learning pathway with ideas for activities... Feel free to contribute :)
-- Michael Nelsonhttp://liveandletlearn.net/




Re: [WSG] Target sued over non-accessible site

2006-02-13 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/13/06, Duckworth, Nigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stuart Sherwood wrote:
> > I believe there is no "right to access services".
> > Any such aberration of 'rights' that necessarily
> > violates the legitimate rights of others is
> > destructive to our liberty.
>
> I agree. There is no such thing as the "right" to force someone else to
> do anything. In a proper society rights exist precisely to prevent the
> initiation of physical force in social relationships.
>
> As this is more political philosophy than web standards, and a
> passionate topic for many, I'll post my thoughts later at
> nigelduckworth.com rather than here.

I never wanted this to turn into a political discussion but that's
where it's been taken. I thought there was no question about the legal
grounds of the whole case but since there have been then I hope I can
lay them to rest right here.

Legally courts can and will regulate companies. It's been happening
for years! We tell them the required minimum wage, the maximum working
hours, we regulate overtime, we tell them to put wheelchair ramps in
front of their doors, we zone their buildings, we make them get
permits, we do health inspections, etc. etc. etc. We have all these
laws in place to protect people. People are guaranteed freedom, not
companies.

No, the courts cannot force me to make my website accessible, but they
can force Target Inc. Co. TM (R) to make their website accessible,
just like they can force Target to do a lot of other things, because
Target is not a person. It is a seperate entity. It is subject to the
rule of the courts. And hopefully the courts are interpreting the laws
correctly and deciding what the people want, in applying it to their
decisions. I know it gets sketchy after that, but that is how things
are supposed to work.

We need to stop arguing with each other about the legal basis of this
case and just wait and see whether or not the courts will apply the
ADA to this website. It's that simple, and hopefully we can now get to
what we should be discussing here, that is, the technical reasons why
Target.com is not accessible and identifying other company websites
that are also making the same mistakes. That's all.

--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Derek

thx for the link...

I've had trouble before with three-column layouts; Will study the code

--


Sincerely,
Derek E. Land, Creative Director
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobile: 1-585-880-6513

the ideastreet media
www.theideastreet.com
1-585-728-2748
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Al Sparber

Christian Montoya wrote:

Yes, but if you don't use HTML 4.01 Strict, you will get quirks mode
from some browsers. I think that's what Ric was wondering.


Eh, not on that page - but if it's important, here you go:
http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent-strict.htm

--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that 
repairs

are scheduled for next Tuesday".




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/13/06, Al Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Ric Raftis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Al Sparber wrote:
> >
> >> We're compiling a folder of CSS layouts. Feel free to play.
> >> There'll be more.
> >>
> >> http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent.htm
> >>
> >>
> > OK, I'll be the silly bugger who asks.  Why is the layout using a
> > HTML 4.01 Transitional DTD?  Just curious.
>
> Because I don't see a practical purpose in using anything else :-)
> It's a sparse page, easily converted to xhtml syntax if one desires
> that.
>

Yes, but if you don't use HTML 4.01 Strict, you will get quirks mode
from some browsers. I think that's what Ric was wondering.

--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Al Sparber

From: "Ric Raftis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Al Sparber wrote:

We're compiling a folder of CSS layouts. Feel free to play. 
There'll be more.


http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent.htm


OK, I'll be the silly bugger who asks.  Why is the layout using a 
HTML 4.01 Transitional DTD?  Just curious.


Because I don't see a practical purpose in using anything else :-) 
It's a sparse page, easily converted to xhtml syntax if one desires 
that.


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling 
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that 
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday".





**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Ric Raftis

Al Sparber wrote:

We're compiling a folder of CSS layouts. Feel free to play. There'll 
be more.


http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent.htm


OK, I'll be the silly bugger who asks.  Why is the layout using a HTML 
4.01 Transitional DTD?  Just curious.


Regards,

Ric
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Derek

thx for the link...

I've had trouble before with three-column layouts; Will study the code

--


Sincerely,
Derek E. Land, Creative Director
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobile: 1-585-880-6513

the ideastreet media
www.theideastreet.com
1-585-728-2748
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] CSS Holy Gruel

2006-02-13 Thread Al Sparber
We're compiling a folder of CSS layouts. Feel free to play. There'll 
be more.


http://www.projectseven.com/tutorials/css/holy-gruel/juanpercent.htm


--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

"Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling 
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that 
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday".





**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: Recall: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Herrod, Lisa
Man you guys are tough! I've only had 3 hours sleep!

I was just trying to not flood the list with personal emails! Thanks for the
kind words James, as always, you know I'd love to come back into TAFE to
rally the troops!

> -Original Message-
> From: James Gollan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2006 11:09 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: Recall: [WSG] Web design education
> 
> 
> Mark Harris wrote:
> > Terrence Wood wrote:
> >> Herrod, Lisa wrote:
> >>> Herrod, Lisa would like to recall the message, "[WSG] Web design 
> >>> education".
> >> What does that mean and where does it come from? Someone 
> else sent me 
> >> one of those recently.
> >>
> >>
> > Generally, it means someone is using Outlook on an 
> MS-Exchange server 
> > as their mail set up. Exchange allows you to recall 
> messages on your 
> > local server if the recipient hasn't opened it yet. It doesn't work 
> > outside your local environment though.
> Of course it has a secondary effect of causing great interest in the 
> offending email, subjecting it to a level of scrutiny that it would 
> otherwise not enjoy!
> **
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
> 
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: Recall: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread James Gollan

Mark Harris wrote:

Terrence Wood wrote:

Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Herrod, Lisa would like to recall the message, "[WSG] Web design 
education".
What does that mean and where does it come from? Someone else sent me 
one of those recently.



Generally, it means someone is using Outlook on an MS-Exchange server 
as their mail set up. Exchange allows you to recall messages on your 
local server if the recipient hasn't opened it yet. It doesn't work 
outside your local environment though.
Of course it has a secondary effect of causing great interest in the 
offending email, subjecting it to a level of scrutiny that it would 
otherwise not enjoy!

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread James Gollan

Ric Raftis wrote:

James Gollan wrote:

I feel it is worth pointing out that not all educational institutions 
are still teaching table based design. As an educator I feel I am in 
a great position to make a difference at a 'grass roots' level. 
Students studying web design at our college (Ultimo TAFE) are exposed 
to about as much evangelism as they can take! 
..


It was interesting reading your post James because it seems that TAFEs 
across the country may vary widely despite courses supposedly being 
drawn from a national based syllabus and providing national 
accreditation.


As I mentioned - we work of syllabus documents based on industry 
developed training packages that are often close to 10 years old. In IT 
that is an absurd situation. If the individual is working in isolation 
based on these documents it would be possible (and 'valid' from an 
assessment point of view) to deliver frames and table-based layout. We 
typically stretch or reinterpret the outcomes to make them relevant to 
current industry practice, but for the aforementioned reasons there is 
no guarantee that each TAFE will deliver the same content - even if you 
do identical modules.


TAFE is working reasonably hard on the concept of assessment validation 
- the goal being that every student will be trained to to the same level 
and assessed to this level regardless of college location. This has been 
difficult to achieve without using centralised assessments - an 
expensive and cumbersome approach with many problems of its own, 
including a real lack of flexibility.


I am sorry to hear that your experience of TAFE was less that optimal, 
but it is great to hear that they were willing to listen, and that you 
achieved what you wanted through the course. In many ways this is part 
of the education process, with your tutor taking on the role of a 
facilitator for your learning rather than the more classical 
lecturer/teacher role.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Paula Petrik
FWIW. Here's an interesting item. Using the Syllabus Finder at the  
Center for History & New Media, I searched for "web design." The  
search returned about 189,000 results. As I looked through the first  
couple of pages of listings, I was struck by the range of departments  
in the web design ed biz and the number of web standards folks.  
Perhaps things are not as bad as first impressions might suggest. If  
you're interested, Syllabus Finder is available at:


http://chnm.gmu.edu/tools/syllabi/

Best,
Paula

Paula Petrik
Professor
Department of History & Art History
Associate Director
Center for History & New Media
George Mason University
http://www.archiva.net





On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Chris Taylor wrote:

A large university here in the UK offers web design courses. But I  
don't

hold out much hope for the future when they have things like this in
their syllabus:

"Without the use of tables, all web pages would have to be  
presented in
purely linear form. Many creative uses of the screen would be  
impossible

to achieve. Although tables are a little trickier than other effects
used in basic web design, it is mainly a matter of remembering that
HTML's first purpose is to structure the page; tables are just an
extension of this basic idea. Once you have mastered the basics,  
you can

get some very sophisticated effects with table tags."

(Taken from
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/acom/webdesign/materials/lesson4.html)

Has anyone attended this course? Is it really as bad as all that? To
what extent can students do it "the right way" without being penalised
from straying from the Official Course Documentation?

And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and  
apathy
towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's hope that  
the

recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.

Chris Taylor
www.stillbreathing.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] accessible drill-down into a nested list

2006-02-13 Thread Terrence Wood


Ian Anderson:

I think this would be immensely bad design for screen reader users. 
This is a site map. What you may be missing is that too many links are 
the bane of a screen reader user's life. They rely on using links as a 
kind of binary tree to navigate the site - the last thing they benefit 
from is hearing links again that they have already discarded as not of 
interest. They go back much more than sighted users in order to find a 
link they heard before.


The other interesting thing is that screen reader users build a mental 
map of a site that is nothing like the real architecture, based on the 
links they hear. If every link is on every page, all pages sound the 
same to them, because about half of a user's time on each page is 
spent listing the links. When the links on each page are mostly 
unique, screen reader users perform better in tasks.


This is great, I'd really like to send this as a reply every time 
someone asks about dropdown menus ;-)


The lack of uniqueness in link labels and too much navigation (e.g. the 
site map on every page) affects all users not just screen reader users.


I recently completed user testing for a navigation system with 165+ 
links in it. Most tasks were eventually completed though not without 
error(s). We observed a lot of backtracking, confusion over similar 
(i.e not unique enough) labels and false positives (where users were 
confident the task was complete but they were not in the prescribed 
location). Most users requested additional contextual information (e.g. 
tooltips, or deks). So indications are, IMO (based on this, and my 
recent reading of Spool on global navigation) that less global 
navigation, and more contextual navigation is generally better for 
content rich sites.


kind regards
Terrence Wood.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread James Gollan

Christian Montoya wrote:

On 2/13/06, James Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

Chris Taylor wrote:


And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and apathy
towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's hope that the
recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.

  

I feel it is worth pointing out that not all educational institutions
are still teaching table based design.



Yes, we know. I've told the list before that the classes I take at
Cornell teach standards based design with CSS, and it's exciting to
know that all my peers are standardistas like me. But it is very easy
for professors to go against change and keep teaching the same
methods... and if the sites they use are Google-Amazon-Ebay, they
might not even notice that anything has changed. 
Absolutely agree that the institution can provide a fairly protected 
environment for those who want to use it that way - the inertia 
generated by tenure and impending retirement is often insurmountable! 
Encouraging student feedback seems to be one of the only ways of change 
in this situation.

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: Recall: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Mark Harris

Terrence Wood wrote:

Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Herrod, Lisa would like to recall the message, "[WSG] Web design 
education".
What does that mean and where does it come from? Someone else sent me 
one of those recently.



Generally, it means someone is using Outlook on an MS-Exchange server as 
their mail set up. Exchange allows you to recall messages on your local 
server if the recipient hasn't opened it yet. It doesn't work outside 
your local environment though.


I think Lisa sent what was meant to be a private message to the list, 
because the default reply-to is to the list. Lisa was probably so busy 
being usable, she forgot to validate her mail ;-)


cheers

Mark Harris
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: Recall: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Samuel Richardson
It's an Outlook feature to recall emails once they've been sent, only 
useful if everyone in your organisation is running Outlook though.



Terrence Wood wrote:

Herrod, Lisa wrote:

Herrod, Lisa would like to recall the message, "[WSG] Web design 
education".


What does that mean and where does it come from? Someone else sent me 
one of those recently.



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: [WSG] [IE 6 Problem] -Container will not align centre to the page.

2006-02-13 Thread Andrew Brown
Thank you Hunt,

I hadn't even noticed I included that xml tag. I was playing around with SVG
shapes half of year ago and I grabbed the Doctype from that document without
thought. Thank you for the reminder.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lachlan Hunt
Sent: February 13, 2006 9:48 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] [IE 6 Problem] -Container will not align centre to the
page.

Omen King wrote:
> I have gone about creating this site for a class I have.
> I have been using in the past XHTML 1.0 strict but the doctype we must use

> is XHTML 1.1 Strict and it is giving me trouble.

Firstly, XHTML 1.1 Strict doesn't exist, it's just XHTML 1.1.  Don't 
confuse it with XHTML 1.0 Strict/Transitional/Frameset, there are no 
such variants for XHTML 1.1.  Secondly, is your teacher aware of the 
fact that real world browsers don't support XHTML 1.1 properly, and that 
some don't support it at all?  Most notably, no version of IE supports 
it - anyone who says (or tries to show) otherwise is lying.  Perhaps my 
recent article would be an enlightening read for both you and your teacher.

http://lachy.id.au/log/2005/12/xhtml-beginners

> I have already know the problem is some kind of rule issue. I am
researching
> the problem currently but if anyone already knows the anwser it would be
> greatly appericated.
> 
> Please view this page both in IE 6 and Firefox.
> 
> http://www.monsterboxproductions.com/hwk/thedigitallibary/index.html

It appears to work in Firefox, IE7 and Opera just fine (though, it 
really only "works" in IE thinks it's receiving HTML, not XHTML - it's a 
MIME type issue).  I don't have IE6 available to test in without 
uninstalling IE7.  However, you need to be aware that using the XML 
declaration triggers quirks mode in IE6 (they fixed that bug in IE7) and 
this may be the cause of your immediate problem.

Remove this line:  


To fix any other problems correctly, it requires using the correct MIME 
type.  The easiest way is to change the file extension to .xht or .xhtml 
and add this line to your .htaccess file on your server (create it if 
you don't have one, Google for ".htaccess files" for more info)

AddType application/xhtml+xml .xht .xhtml

(After doing this, you won't be able to view it in IE, only Firefox, 
Opera and other descent modern browsers, but you will learn a valuable 
lesson none-the-less)

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: Recall: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Terrence Wood

Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Herrod, Lisa would like to recall the message, "[WSG] Web design 
education".
What does that mean and where does it come from? Someone else sent me 
one of those recently.



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] Colour Contrast Analyser - Firefox Extension 0.2

2006-02-13 Thread Steven . Faulkner

Gez Lemon, of Juicy Studio has released a Colour Contrast Analyser -
Firefox Extension 0.2
[http://juicystudio.com/article/colour-contrast-analyser-firefox-extension.php]

  The Colour Contrast Analyser Firefox extension lists colour
  combinations used in the document in a table that summarises the
  foreground colour, background colour, luminosity contrast ratio, and
  the colour difference and brightness difference used in the algorithm
  suggested in the 26th of April 2000 working draft for Accessibility
  Evaluation and Repair Tools (AERT). Each element is also listed with
  its parent elements, and class and id attribute values when specified
  to make it easier to locate the elements.





with regards

Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
vision australia - information & library service
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong Victoria 3144
Phone: (613) 9864 9281
Fax: (613) 9864 9210
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.accessibleinfo.org.au | www.wat-c.org

Download the Web Accessibility Toolbar
[http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/ais/toolbar/]



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] print style question

2006-02-13 Thread Ted Drake
HI All
I've got a nagging issue. It's on a local directory, so I can't share the
url. 

I've got a page with two large tables. Each is in its own container div. I'd
like to get the second table to print on its own page. I've already made
both containing divs block level and applied the page-break-before style to
the second table. I've also tried clear:both and float:none to avoid any
descending behaviors. 

Does anyone have a suggestion for finding the printing conflict?

Thanks


Ted Drake
Front-end Engineer
Yahoo! Tech


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Minh D. Tran
At least we know now that that class "designing with tables" is not being taught as we're speaking..."Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Minh D. Tran wrote:> Great! Please keep us up to date as I am very interested in hearing > about it. Also, let me know if there's anything I can do. Thank you.I got an auto-reply telling me he left Leads to work at Manchester Uni. I forwarded the email to the two alternate contacts the email mentioned.Incidentally, the (C) at the bottom of the pages is 2004...this may or may not be old content that just hasn't been removed.P-- Patrick H. Lauke__re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]www.splintered.co.uk |
 www.photographia.co.ukhttp://redux.deviantart.com__Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Forcehttp://webstandards.org/__**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
		 Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars.

RE: Recall: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Peter Williams
> From: Herrod, Lisa
> 
> Herrod, Lisa would like to recall the message, "[WSG] Web 
> design education".

Lisa Herrod is funny :-)

-- 
Peter Williams
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Christian Montoya
On 2/13/06, James Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Taylor wrote:
> > And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
> > accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and apathy
> > towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's hope that the
> > recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.
> >
> I feel it is worth pointing out that not all educational institutions
> are still teaching table based design.

Yes, we know. I've told the list before that the classes I take at
Cornell teach standards based design with CSS, and it's exciting to
know that all my peers are standardistas like me. But it is very easy
for professors to go against change and keep teaching the same
methods... and if the sites they use are Google-Amazon-Ebay, they
might not even notice that anything has changed. And, unfortunately, a
professor like this one has far more influence than any
big-name-design-firm. Far more.

--
--
Christian Montoya
christianmontoya.com ... rdpdesign.com ... cssliquid.com
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Ric Raftis

James Gollan wrote:

I feel it is worth pointing out that not all educational institutions 
are still teaching table based design. As an educator I feel I am in a 
great position to make a difference at a 'grass roots' level. Students 
studying web design at our college (Ultimo TAFE) are exposed to about 
as much evangelism as they can take! ..


It was interesting reading your post James because it seems that TAFEs 
across the country may vary widely despite courses supposedly being 
drawn from a national based syllabus and providing national accreditation.


I recently completed a Certificate IV in Web Design at the Bendigo TAFE 
(BRIT) and my experience was anything but what you describe.  Students 
were permitted to design their final assignment, a total web site of 
their choosing, in any layout they wished, even Frames!  Yes, they were 
expected to validate both their xhtml and css, but only to low levels.  
Tables seemed to be the most popular layout used.  Personally, I did the 
course to learn more about css layouts and I achieved this.  Some help 
was achieved through contact with one particular lecturer who was 
enthusiastic, but out of date and teaching deprecated tags at times.  
However, to his credit, he was willing to do the research and admit his 
shortcomings.  Most of my learning regarding structure of css sites came 
from active participation in a forum at www.htmlforums.com where the 
moderators are certainly evangelists for css layouts.


Regards,

Ric

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Recall: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Herrod, Lisa
Herrod, Lisa would like to recall the message, "[WSG] Web design education".
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Herrod, Lisa
:) good work Jimmy G, and thanks for the good press!

looking forward to coming out there... you know if there was ever a chance
to teach the usability I'd jump at it!

lisa

> -Original Message-
> From: James Gollan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2006 8:00 AM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org; Russ Weakly
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Web design education
> 
> 
> Chris Taylor wrote:
> > And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
> > accessibility evangelists to do about the continued 
> ingorance and apathy
> > towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's 
> hope that the
> > recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.
> >
> >   
> I feel it is worth pointing out that not all educational institutions 
> are still teaching table based design. As an educator I feel 
> I am in a 
> great position to make a difference at a 'grass roots' level. 
> Students 
> studying web design at our college (Ultimo TAFE) are exposed 
> to about as 
> much evangelism as they can take! There is a brief mention of 
> tables for 
> design, but as a primer for what they may find themselves 
> working with 
> in industry. Every site that they design should validate to a strict 
> doctype (they choose between HTML and XHMTL after being 
> presented with 
> the arguments for and against) and use CSS for all aspects of layout. 
> They spend an hour and a half per week studying usability and 
> accessibility, they have access to multiple browsers, 
> operating systems, 
> and even JAWS (until recently :( ). First lesson they are directed to 
> join this list!
> Past teachers have been such luminaries as Lisa Herrod and 
> Roger Hudson, 
> and, at the end of semester when they are dizzy from this barrage of 
> evangalism, they get a good talking to from people such as 
> Russ Weakley, 
> Lindsay Evans, Peter Ottery, Lisa Herrod and Roger Hudson (not all on 
> the same bill, unfortunately).
> I know of other TAFE's (particularly Blue Mountains) that 
> have a similar 
> approach toward standards.
> Unfortunately it often comes down to the teachers at the educational 
> institution to promote this viewpoint, as syllabus documents are 
> normally vague and hopelessly out of date. We are currently 
> working of a 
> training package that was first developed around 1997 (may have been 
> 1999, but hell, it's old). It mentions tables for layout etc.
> I am sure that other institutions would be taking a similar 
> approach to 
> web design as us If not, hopefully the word will get out and 
> the course 
> will either drop off or modify its content. We do have 
> mailing lists for 
> educators in TAFE to try to disseminate the knowledge and facilitate 
> discussion.
> I agree that there can be an apathy in educational 
> institutions - often 
> as a result of the institutional structure - but it is not 
> necessarily 
> the case.
> Just wanted to point that out ;)
> **
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
> 
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

Minh D. Tran wrote:
Great! Please keep us up to date as I am very interested in hearing 
about it. Also, let me know if there's anything I can do. Thank you.


I got an auto-reply telling me he left Leads to work at Manchester Uni. 
I forwarded the email to the two alternate contacts the email mentioned.


Incidentally, the (C) at the bottom of the pages is 2004...this may or 
may not be old content that just hasn't been removed.


P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Minh D. Tran
Great! Please keep us up to date as I am very interested in hearing about it. Also, let me know if there's anything I can do. Thank you."Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Minh D. Tran wrote:> One of our responsibility as a member of the WSG is to "Promote "web > standards" within the development community," so here is our chance. If > we don't do anything about this, than that totally defeats the purpose > of WSG's existence. Where do we start?Well, as a start, I emailed Drew (course leader on that particular course) pointing at the web-based mail archive for this list. Small moves, small moves.P-- Patrick H. Lauke__re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see
 duke.]www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.ukhttp://redux.deviantart.com__Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Forcehttp://webstandards.org/__**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
		Relax. Yahoo! Mail 
virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

Re: [WSG] Target sued over non-accessible site

2006-02-13 Thread Stuart Sherwood

Jude Robinson wrote:
Only companies/institutions are required to comply with accessibility 
legislation (in the UK, and US as far as I'm aware). Accessibility 
legislation does not require individuals to comply with it, rightly so.


I thought individuals owned and worked in companies...
Companies might legally be entities, but then neither companies nor law 
exist outside the ideas and actions of individual men.


Please respond off list.

--
Regards,
*Stuart Sherwood*
RE-ENTITY DESIGN 
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread James Gollan

Chris Taylor wrote:

And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and apathy
towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's hope that the
recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.

  
I feel it is worth pointing out that not all educational institutions 
are still teaching table based design. As an educator I feel I am in a 
great position to make a difference at a 'grass roots' level. Students 
studying web design at our college (Ultimo TAFE) are exposed to about as 
much evangelism as they can take! There is a brief mention of tables for 
design, but as a primer for what they may find themselves working with 
in industry. Every site that they design should validate to a strict 
doctype (they choose between HTML and XHMTL after being presented with 
the arguments for and against) and use CSS for all aspects of layout. 
They spend an hour and a half per week studying usability and 
accessibility, they have access to multiple browsers, operating systems, 
and even JAWS (until recently :( ). First lesson they are directed to 
join this list!
Past teachers have been such luminaries as Lisa Herrod and Roger Hudson, 
and, at the end of semester when they are dizzy from this barrage of 
evangalism, they get a good talking to from people such as Russ Weakley, 
Lindsay Evans, Peter Ottery, Lisa Herrod and Roger Hudson (not all on 
the same bill, unfortunately).
I know of other TAFE's (particularly Blue Mountains) that have a similar 
approach toward standards.
Unfortunately it often comes down to the teachers at the educational 
institution to promote this viewpoint, as syllabus documents are 
normally vague and hopelessly out of date. We are currently working of a 
training package that was first developed around 1997 (may have been 
1999, but hell, it's old). It mentions tables for layout etc.
I am sure that other institutions would be taking a similar approach to 
web design as us If not, hopefully the word will get out and the course 
will either drop off or modify its content. We do have mailing lists for 
educators in TAFE to try to disseminate the knowledge and facilitate 
discussion.
I agree that there can be an apathy in educational institutions - often 
as a result of the institutional structure - but it is not necessarily 
the case.

Just wanted to point that out ;)
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Tom Livingston



On 2/13/06 3:23 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Minh D. Tran wrote:
>> One of our responsibility as a member of the WSG is to "Promote "web
>> standards" within the development community," so here is our chance. If
>> we don't do anything about this, than that totally defeats the purpose
>> of WSG's existence. Where do we start?

Any chance their course description has just not been updated since 1995?
Just going with the benefit of the doubt, you know?

-- 

Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

Minh D. Tran wrote:
One of our responsibility as a member of the WSG is to "Promote "web 
standards" within the development community," so here is our chance. If 
we don't do anything about this, than that totally defeats the purpose 
of WSG's existence. Where do we start?


Well, as a start, I emailed Drew (course leader on that particular 
course) pointing at the web-based mail archive for this list. Small 
moves, small moves.


P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Minh D. Tran
One of our responsibility as a member of the WSG is to "Promote "web standards" within the development community," so here is our chance. If we don't do anything about this, than that totally defeats the purpose of WSG's existence. Where do we start?Jay Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Minh D. Tran wrote:> I personally believe as "Accessibility Evangelists," part of our > responsibilities is to bring this to their attention. These are web > designing instructors, they are teaching more and more people to design > the "tables" way, which is the exact way that we are trying eliminate.> This is the exact same reason for my main argument in my thread on Calling for a scalable business case for web standards for small business. My point was, and still is, that groups like WaSP and WSG need to take more
 of an advocacy role on in the larger community. Yes it makes sense to convert the people who have gone through these programs but if business demanded that sites be standards based and accessible then schools who teach otherwise will stop graduating people into nested table hell.Don't tell me to join a WSG in my local area. Don't tell me that we should just keep doing the work. We need to get up on our soap boxes and convert business, thought leaders and educators that standards matter and that building a broken web is bad for everyone.I know that there are members of WaSP who are trying to get educators on board but there is still a bunch of people out there who are ex graphic designers or visual developers who know only Dreamweaver or StopDead (GoLive) who are asked to teach because they have won some prize or worked for a big company.All the best,Jay-- Jay GilmoreDeveloper /
 ConsultantSmashingRed Web & MarketingP] 902.529.0651E] [EMAIL PROTECTED]U] http://www.smashingred.comB] http://www.smashingred.com/blog**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list & getting help**__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

Re: [WSG] Target sued over non-accessible site

2006-02-13 Thread Jude Robinson

Stuart Sherwood wrote:


Any such aberration of 
'rights' that necessarily violates the legitimate rights of others is 
destructive to our liberty.


True when the "others" are people. But we're discussing a scenario where 
the "other" is a company, and that scenario has radically different 
requirements for the defense of individual liberty.


Only companies/institutions are required to comply with accessibility 
legislation (in the UK, and US as far as I'm aware). Accessibility 
legislation does not require individuals to comply with it, rightly so.


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Jay Gilmore

Minh D. Tran wrote:
I personally believe as "Accessibility Evangelists," part of our 
responsibilities is to bring this to their attention. These are web 
designing instructors, they are teaching more and more people to design 
the "tables" way, which is the exact way that we are trying eliminate.


This is the exact same reason for my main argument in my thread on 
Calling for a scalable business case for web standards for small 
business. My point was, and still is, that groups like WaSP and WSG need 
to take more of an advocacy role on in the larger community. Yes it 
makes sense to convert the people who have gone through these programs 
but if business demanded that sites be standards based and accessible 
then schools who teach otherwise will stop graduating people into nested 
table hell.


Don't tell me to join a WSG in my local area. Don't tell me that we 
should just keep doing the work. We need to get up on our soap boxes and 
convert business, thought leaders and educators that standards matter 
and that building a broken web is bad for everyone.


I know that there are members of WaSP who are trying to get educators on 
board but there is still a bunch of people out there who are ex graphic 
designers or visual developers who know only Dreamweaver or StopDead 
(GoLive) who are asked to teach because they have won some prize or 
worked for a big company.


All the best,

Jay
--
Jay Gilmore
Developer / Consultant
SmashingRed Web & Marketing
P] 902.529.0651
E] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
U] http://www.smashingred.com
B] http://www.smashingred.com/blog
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Minh D. Tran
I personally believe as "Accessibility Evangelists," part of our responsibilities is to bring this to their attention. These are web designing instructors, they are teaching more and more people to design the "tables" way, which is the exact way that we are trying eliminate.Stephen Stagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  That's a major reason why I didn't go to university, you don't learn nuffink(sic. :) ) useful. and have to pay around £10,000 for the privilegeStephenOn 13 Feb 2006, at 15:24, Chris Taylor wrote:> A large university here in the UK offers web design courses. But I > don't> hold out much hope for the future when they have things like this in> their syllabus:>> "Without the use of tables, all web pages would have to be > presented in> purely linear form. Many
 creative uses of the screen would be > impossible> to achieve. Although tables are a little trickier than other effects> used in basic web design, it is mainly a matter of remembering that> HTML's first purpose is to structure the page; tables are just an> extension of this basic idea. Once you have mastered the basics, > you can> get some very sophisticated effects with table tags.">> (Taken from> http://www.leeds.ac.uk/acom/webdesign/materials/lesson4.html)>> Has anyone attended this course? Is it really as bad as all that? To> what extent can students do it "the right way" without being penalised> from straying from the Official Course Documentation?>> And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and> accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and > apathy> towards this vital subject, especially in academia?
 Let's hope that > the> recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.>> Chris Taylor> www.stillbreathing.co.uk> **> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/>> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help> **>**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list & getting help**
	
		 Yahoo! Mail 
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Juergen Auer
Hello,

On 13 Feb 2006 at 15:24, Chris Taylor wrote:

> "Without the use of tables, all web pages would have to be presented in
> purely linear form.

thanks about such a sequence (or joke?). Ok, I read the same on the
'lesson4.html', there this is not a joke. But it's interesting to
read such a statement 2006 (or 2004).

I think, we should send them a lot of links with pages created
without any table and showing more non-linear elements.

Tables are excellent showing tabular data.

Regards,
Juergen Auer



Jürgen Auer, http://www.sql-und-xml.de/
Web-Datenbanken zum Mieten
Friedenstr. 37, 10 249 Berlin
Tel.: (030) 420 20 060
Fax: (030) 420 19 819
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Stephen Stagg
That's a major reason why I didn't go to university, you don't learn  
nuffink(sic. :) ) useful. and have to pay around £10,000 for the  
privilege


Stephen

On 13 Feb 2006, at 15:24, Chris Taylor wrote:

A large university here in the UK offers web design courses. But I  
don't

hold out much hope for the future when they have things like this in
their syllabus:

"Without the use of tables, all web pages would have to be  
presented in
purely linear form. Many creative uses of the screen would be  
impossible

to achieve. Although tables are a little trickier than other effects
used in basic web design, it is mainly a matter of remembering that
HTML's first purpose is to structure the page; tables are just an
extension of this basic idea. Once you have mastered the basics,  
you can

get some very sophisticated effects with table tags."

(Taken from
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/acom/webdesign/materials/lesson4.html)

Has anyone attended this course? Is it really as bad as all that? To
what extent can students do it "the right way" without being penalised
from straying from the Official Course Documentation?

And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and  
apathy
towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's hope that  
the

recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.

Chris Taylor
www.stillbreathing.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread standards
Chris,

I've conducted several courses in CSS at a local community college where
CSS-based designs are emphasized. The faculty and students embrace Web
Standards, and understand the inherit value of using standard's
technologies.

All is not lost :)

Respectfully yours,
Mario S. Cisneros

> A large university here in the UK offers web design courses. But I don't
> hold out much hope for the future when they have things like this in
> their syllabus:
>
> "Without the use of tables, all web pages would have to be presented in
> purely linear form. Many creative uses of the screen would be impossible
> to achieve. Although tables are a little trickier than other effects
> used in basic web design, it is mainly a matter of remembering that
> HTML's first purpose is to structure the page; tables are just an
> extension of this basic idea. Once you have mastered the basics, you can
> get some very sophisticated effects with table tags."
>
> (Taken from
> http://www.leeds.ac.uk/acom/webdesign/materials/lesson4.html)
>
> Has anyone attended this course? Is it really as bad as all that? To
> what extent can students do it "the right way" without being penalised
> from straying from the Official Course Documentation?
>
> And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
> accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and apathy
> towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's hope that the
> recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.
>
> Chris Taylor
> www.stillbreathing.co.uk
> **
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] Web design education

2006-02-13 Thread Chris Taylor
A large university here in the UK offers web design courses. But I don't
hold out much hope for the future when they have things like this in
their syllabus:

"Without the use of tables, all web pages would have to be presented in
purely linear form. Many creative uses of the screen would be impossible
to achieve. Although tables are a little trickier than other effects
used in basic web design, it is mainly a matter of remembering that
HTML's first purpose is to structure the page; tables are just an
extension of this basic idea. Once you have mastered the basics, you can
get some very sophisticated effects with table tags."

(Taken from
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/acom/webdesign/materials/lesson4.html)

Has anyone attended this course? Is it really as bad as all that? To
what extent can students do it "the right way" without being penalised
from straying from the Official Course Documentation?

And, a larger question for us all: what are we as web standards and
accessibility evangelists to do about the continued ingorance and apathy
towards this vital subject, especially in academia? Let's hope that the
recent Target website court case in the US highlights the cause.

Chris Taylor
www.stillbreathing.co.uk
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] [IE 6 Problem] -Container will not align centre to the page.

2006-02-13 Thread Lachlan Hunt

Omen King wrote:

I have gone about creating this site for a class I have.
I have been using in the past XHTML 1.0 strict but the doctype we must use 
is XHTML 1.1 Strict and it is giving me trouble.


Firstly, XHTML 1.1 Strict doesn't exist, it's just XHTML 1.1.  Don't 
confuse it with XHTML 1.0 Strict/Transitional/Frameset, there are no 
such variants for XHTML 1.1.  Secondly, is your teacher aware of the 
fact that real world browsers don't support XHTML 1.1 properly, and that 
some don't support it at all?  Most notably, no version of IE supports 
it - anyone who says (or tries to show) otherwise is lying.  Perhaps my 
recent article would be an enlightening read for both you and your teacher.


http://lachy.id.au/log/2005/12/xhtml-beginners


I have already know the problem is some kind of rule issue. I am researching
the problem currently but if anyone already knows the anwser it would be
greatly appericated.

Please view this page both in IE 6 and Firefox.

http://www.monsterboxproductions.com/hwk/thedigitallibary/index.html


It appears to work in Firefox, IE7 and Opera just fine (though, it 
really only "works" in IE thinks it's receiving HTML, not XHTML - it's a 
MIME type issue).  I don't have IE6 available to test in without 
uninstalling IE7.  However, you need to be aware that using the XML 
declaration triggers quirks mode in IE6 (they fixed that bug in IE7) and 
this may be the cause of your immediate problem.


Remove this line:  


To fix any other problems correctly, it requires using the correct MIME 
type.  The easiest way is to change the file extension to .xht or .xhtml 
and add this line to your .htaccess file on your server (create it if 
you don't have one, Google for ".htaccess files" for more info)


AddType application/xhtml+xml .xht .xhtml

(After doing this, you won't be able to view it in IE, only Firefox, 
Opera and other descent modern browsers, but you will learn a valuable 
lesson none-the-less)


--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Target sued over non-accessible site

2006-02-13 Thread Duckworth, Nigel
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
> I believe there is no "right to access services". 
> Any such aberration of 'rights' that necessarily 
> violates the legitimate rights of others is 
> destructive to our liberty.

I agree. There is no such thing as the "right" to force someone else to
do anything. In a proper society rights exist precisely to prevent the
initiation of physical force in social relationships. 

As this is more political philosophy than web standards, and a
passionate topic for many, I'll post my thoughts later at
nigelduckworth.com rather than here. I also think a proper case can't be
made (on either side) in email soundbites -- but maybe that's just me.
I've heard arguments on the other side but would be happy to hear more,
if you have the inclination please send thoughts/objections/hate mail to
nduckworth[at]gmail[.]com  

Thanks, over and out.

-Nigel


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] [IE 6 Problem] -Container will not align centre to the page.

2006-02-13 Thread Omen King
Hello WSG,I have gone about creating this site for a class I have. I have been using in the past XHTML 1.0 strict but the doctype we must use is XHTML 1.1 Strict and it is giving me trouble. The overall design would not be something I would use as a design but my hands are tied because of the assignment restrictions.
I have already know the problem is some kind of rule issue. I am researching the problem currently but if anyone already knows the anwser it would be greatly appericated.Please view this page both in IE 6 and Firefox.
http://www.monsterboxproductions.com/hwk/thedigitallibary/index.htmlThank you for reading.


[WSG] Feedback on ISO Standard Version of Access For All Metadata

2006-02-13 Thread Geoff Deering



 Original Message 
Subject:reminder about new standard...
Date:   Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:12:50 -0700
From:   ozewai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:   ozewai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



(Mailing List Information, including unsubscription instructions are 
located at the end of this message)


Time is running out for us with the ISO standard version of AccessForAll metadata. This is just a reminder that you could help by testing our forms and commenting - please --- 


See http://dublincore.org/accessibilitywiki/DiscussionOfFcd

Other's comments are also available for you to peruse on that page.

Liddy

http://www.ozewai.org/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] accessible drill-down into a nested list

2006-02-13 Thread Ian Anderson

Paul Novitski wrote:

Tell me if this would be a better scenario:  When you select a menu 
item, the page reloads with a set of breadcrumbs that spells out the 
history of selected menu items, such as:


I think you are correct to be concerned about the issue, but this may
not be the optimal solution. If you consider the requirements of a
screen reader user, their task is one of wading through immense amounts
of irrelevant stuff trying to find the thing of interest at that moment.

What's of most interest at the moment you're describing is hearing the
*new* options that are now available.

The breadcrumb (hierarchical location) is also hugely appreciated as a
means of keeping track of where they are in the site.

From user testing we've done with screen reader users, the most
important thing is that the page title and main heading on the page are
descriptive. The page title is read first as the page loads, and then
the behaviour depends on the screen reader in use. JAWS will typically
skip over stuff that has been seen before, and try to jump to the first
new content on the page. If the page title and heading don't change, 
this can be very destructive for these users, as they start trying to 
backtrack or reload the page to see what has gone wrong.


In the scenario you describe, is the page more or less identical except
that a new submenu has appeared in the navigation area? I think this
would be very harmful UI for screen reader users. The chances of them
locating the submenu are remote, and the chances of them realising that
it represents hierarchically subordinate options are too.

The best solution for these users may be to create menu pages that
contain the submenu links as primary content.

Ensuring that navigation links come after content links in the source 
order may also be very beneficial, as these "downward" or "onward" links 
are much more likely to be what the user is looking for.


Somewhere else on the page, perhaps last in the markup, would be the 
full menu including all menu items at each selected level.  A "jump

to navigation" link early on the page could get you there quickly.


I think this would be immensely bad design for screen reader users. This 
is a site map. What you may be missing is that too many links are the 
bane of a screen reader user's life. They rely on using links as a kind 
of binary tree to navigate the site - the last thing they benefit from 
is hearing links again that they have already discarded as not of 
interest. They go back much more than sighted users in order to find a 
link they heard before.


The other interesting thing is that screen reader users build a mental 
map of a site that is nothing like the real architecture, based on the 
links they hear. If every link is on every page, all pages sound the 
same to them, because about half of a user's time on each page is spent 
listing the links. When the links on each page are mostly unique, screen 
reader users perform better in tasks.


So, have a site map linked off each page, but don't include extra links 
on every page - these are bad for screen reader users, not helpful, in 
my opinion


Hope this helps

Cheers

ian

--
_
zStudio - Web development and accessibility
http://zStudio.co.uk

Snippetz.net - Online code library
File, manage and re-use your code snippets & links
http://snippetz.net

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



[WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

2006-02-13 Thread Felicity Farr
Title: Out of Office AutoReply: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org






I am currently out of the office and will return Wednesday 15th February. For any urgent enquiries please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Felicity Farr
National Project Officer
Flexible Learning Toolboxes

e - Works
| Level 25 | 150 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000
| t [03] 9661 8709 | f [03] 9661 8799
| e [EMAIL PROTECTED] | w www.eworks.edu.au