We have horses for stable.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/23/2015 9:02 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Well there's MT stable, Ubnt stable, stable stable, etc. Like
carrier class.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jan 23, 2015
We have a handful running the 5.6beta, and have not been having any
issues. If you have built any kind of SNMP library for the old SNMP
stack, it is toast. But I do like the more limited SNMP stack in the beta.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/23/2015 8:37 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
Any way to get inside? The LEDs probably run on something like 5 volts
or less, and the 68V is probably because they have a bunch in series.
if you could get inside you might be able to MacGiver something to work
on straight 12V.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/24/2015 10:17 AM, Nate
Right. As I recall, all of our Trangos have positive ground, and it's
tied to the chassis. Not good. Caused us grief when we started hooking
in a SiteMonitor. We had to be very careful about that.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/24/2015 9:37 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
But if he’s talking
Burke wrote:
The bulb comes apart easily. They are all in series, hence the high
voltage. Maybe I will try scraping off some traces and see what happens.
On 1/24/2015 12:39 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Any way to get inside? The LEDs probably run on something like 5
volts or less, and the 68V
A few of the licensed -48V backhauls we've seen (mostly Dragonwave) have
a floating ground on the power input. They didn't really care about
which side (if any) was grounded. So if we used power supplies with
isolated output, we were good to go.
However, if the SiteMonitor actually grounds
yup. Think it will be 13.3.1?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 9:31 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I think they said it is fixed in the March release.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:27 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject
Absolutely. We've been syncing PMP100 with PMP430 with PMP450. They do
play together.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 9:02 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
450 definitely syncs with pmp100.
The 450 couldn't so I doubt it.
Wifi modes been on the SM since at least 2.3
Josh Luthman
yeh. We've known about that for a few months now.
Only problem with 13.3 is that the alignment tone is inop.
Right George?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 9:23 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
hey bill prince! they're giving you your txt config file!!
Yes I do.
:-((
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 9:12 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Perhaps as much as 40 Mbps
Dontcha wish you were at Animal Farm
*From:* Chuck McCown mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:11 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
if you have to ask, you can't afford it.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 9:18 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Price?
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
From: Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net mailto:af...@ics-il.net
Reply-To:
All over again. And again. And again. And again
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/3/2015 10:45 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
deja vu
-Original Message- From: Travis Johnson Sent: Tuesday,
February 03, 2015 11:36 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
Everyone.Net
We ran our own
MMmmm bacon!
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 8:06 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Well and about 6k pigs.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
*From: *Josh Luthman
Would hope so. 350 ms would suck bronto.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 12:32 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
350us ?
On Feb 4, 2015 1:25 PM, Jaime Solorza losguyswirel...@gmail.com
mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep 9k, msrp per side. Several hundred deployed in Manhattan
So what's with the 3 antenna connectors on top? The little video only
shows using the two outside. What would the third one be for?
And what does HDD stand for? Hybrid Division Duplex? Hoaky Division
Duplex? Haquioktaha Division Duplex?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 3:58 PM,
Doh!
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/4/2015 5:25 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
The 3rd is for the GPS Antenna for Sync.
Luckily, this particular guy is on a dedicated 25x25 service. We don't
care how much he uses. Turns out his big thing is running Citrix all
the time, and it only requires 6 to 10 Mbps.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/30/2015 8:26 AM, Andy Trimmell wrote:
thats where the 300GB comes in.
We use all the above, depending on the POP.
We've found they are all reliable as long as the GPS antenna is in a
decent location. We have one syncpipe that loses sync about once a
month, but we're certain it's because of the poor location we're using
for the GPS antenna.
bp
At 10 Mbps, you're doing something like 100 GB per day if the rate is
sustained.
We have one individual on our network that is running Citrix at home for
his business, and he does approximately that rate sustained 24x7. His
data consumption is approximately 1/2 terabyte per week.
If you
Uber is now more than half the taxi business in San Francisco. When
they ask users, they say it's a more reliable ride than traditional
taxis. At least in SF, you can call a cab, but they don't always show up.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/2/2015 12:16 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
I find the
, and not necessarily on the total revenue.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/2/2015 12:22 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
You guys and your supporting unregulated public utility wannabees
what a bunch of pirates
Our infrastructure is going to go to hell in a handbasket.
*From:* Bill Prince
Puerto Rico is even further, and you would probably flood the engine on
your Yugo.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/2/2015 10:04 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Miami is pretty far from SLC.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Looks like some sort of dual polarity sector antenna. The coax leads
look like they go to something on the other side of the pole?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/6/2015 11:49 AM, Butch Evans wrote:
But you've all been tipped off now.
Just look around to make sure there isn't someone like David
Copperfield, Patrick Jane, or Penn Teller in the room.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/5/2015 8:28 AM, Jay Weekley wrote:
Now he's going to check our socks.
That One Guy wrote:
That sounds
Not true. I just signed up with one of our regular company accounts;
and they are not gmail.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/2/2015 9:25 AM, Andy Trimmell wrote:
Ive found that you have to sign up with a gmail account. Any other
email I tried just said Error.
*From:*Af
What's the X stand for? 10? 10 GHz? 10 Gbps? Or is it just the
unknown sort of like the X-files?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/2/2015 11:20 AM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
Is this being announced at Animal Farm???
We notice that any time we use NAT on UBNT we get a lot of login
attempts via SSH. Are any of you using the firewall built in? It's not
clear from the GUI interface whether this affects input or forwarding,
or both.
What I'd like to do is block any SSH logins that are not in one of our
That's my understanding. When the FCC switched broadcast TV to digital,
the upper part of the broadcast TV spectrum was auctioned off. Verizon got
most of it I believe that's what they are using for the bulk of their LTE
for now.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza
There is marketing, and then there is marketing. Heck, we're getting ~~
490 Mbps in 50 MHz on some HC+ units; and that's still only 256QAM. A
few more QAMs and I think it would go over 500Mbps per channel.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/14/2015 2:23 PM, Peter Kranz wrote:
What are the
/15, 8:09 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
This all sounds like nomenclature and smoke and mirrors.
If there are two antennas; one H and one V, then it would be 2x2 MIMO,
unless you are running more than one radio per polarity. Then it's still
not 4x4 MIMO, but more like 2x2 PLUS 2x2
This all sounds like nomenclature and smoke and mirrors.
If there are two antennas; one H and one V, then it would be 2x2 MIMO,
unless you are running more than one radio per polarity. Then it's still
not 4x4 MIMO, but more like 2x2 PLUS 2x2?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/14/2015 3:55
Getting this on the Ethernet stats with a couple of SMs running in NAT
mode. I thought the TCP/IP would self-throttle to a large degree. Is
the SM faulty, or is the customer's router just stuffing the pipe
without regard to anything? Anything I can do about it?
RxOverrun :
1628
I think I would call that 2x2 MIMO.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/14/2015 2:29 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
You need to add to the fact that you can get more 2x the bandwitdh by
adding a second ODU and antenna in a setup similar to spatial diversity
Using the same channel and polarity�
Next Shack
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ken Hohhof af...@kwisp.com wrote:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2015-01-15/radioshack-said-in-
talks-to-sell-stores-to-sprint-in-bankruptcy.html
--
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
Samsung makes commercial cell extenders (AKA femtocells) that will
handle a couple dozen simultaneous calls.
Haven't seen anything that will handle LTE yet, but they've been
announced almost a year now.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/16/2015 7:10 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
For over 30
Snakes don't bother me at all. But those dang 20 lb rats scare the crap
out of me...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/16/2015 8:05 AM, That One Guy wrote:
The mice dont bother me, unless theyre eating my cables. The rats on
the other hand, Unless theyre being fed to a snake, I dont have
swoll for the
Arnold Classic. :)
On January 16, 2015 7:59:34 AM AKST, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
wrote:
Snakes don't bother me at all. But those dang 20 lb rats scare the
crap out of me...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/16/2015 8:05 AM, That One Guy wrote
ouch.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
They broke it and sent out a release version. Not cool.
Mark
On Jan 16, 2015, at 1:58 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
I'm lost.. or slow. They took the alignment tone out or
A lot of people are tone deaf, but I think it's more rare than color
blindness.
The tone alignment has always worked very well for me.
I happen to be color blind, but it has not been a major problem for me.
I still see colors, but I think the intensity (or something) is
different. I
}com
On 1/16/2015 12:48 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Sure it wasn’t a muskrat?
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 11:19 AM
*To:* Motorola III mailto:af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] holy crap...
The big rat came when I was working on my brother-in-law's farm
I know you can run a combiner on Trango, Dragonwave, and Exalt for
sure. I'm certain you can run one on most of the others too, with some
restrictions. It's a nice option because it gives you some redundancy
along with doubling the throughput.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/16/2015
We have had failures on two different Dragonwave radios.
One ODU (AirPair) developed a problem where it would stop passing
traffic when the temperature dropped below 32°.
A second set of radios (Horizon Compact +) with an obscure problem that
was apparently triggered by some kind of
specify which
interface is the management interface. Don't route it out of your network.
On January 20, 2015 9:13:06 AM AKST, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
wrote:
My understanding of the UBNT VLAN is that it's all one VLAN? How
do you split management/sub traffic?
bp
part15sbs
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 1:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] UBNT firewall
Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/14/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We
My understanding of the UBNT VLAN is that it's all one VLAN? How do you
split management/sub traffic?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/20/2015 10:05 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Management. VLAN.
On January 20, 2015 8:51:22 AM AKST, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not the AP side
Nobody actually using the UBNT firewall?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/14/2015 11:25 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
We notice that any time we use NAT on UBNT we get a lot of login
attempts via SSH. Are any of you using the firewall built in? It's
not clear from the GUI interface whether
I remember working on an old Data General multi-user basic system.
Sure, it was only running a basic interpreter, but it supported 4
simultaneous users in a TOTAL of 16 KB of memory (core memory at that)...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/21/2015 7:42 AM, Jon Bruce wrote:
And we only
It's a way to package up everything that makes up an application and
make it uber portable. The program, the context, the storage,
everything. Once you have the container, it can be put it/run it anywhere.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/21/2015 10:22 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I thought
any VMs running in our office; those are all down in
the colo.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/21/2015 11:49 AM, Caleb Knauer wrote:
Sounds like the AP was re-provisioning? Did wifi come back up after a
minute or two?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
I
*From: *Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
*To: *Motorola III af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 12:58:54 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi for restaurant
I don't know if this is a bug or not... Our new Unifi AP has been
running about 24 hours without a hitch. I started up the controller
issue?
Not nice.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/20/2015 11:54 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
It runs like shit on windows. It's using Linux emulation libraries.
On January 20, 2015 10:48:12 AM AKST, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
The machine I first loaded it on is running Windows 8.1 (puke
a browser. Look how fast WInbox
is, even when it needs to download the plugins for the version of RoS
on a certain router. Or remember smartBridges and their
simpleMonitor? It was basically a small program that accessed the
radio via SNMP.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent
I generally figure about 10% loss for each conversion. Some inverters
and some power supplies will be better and/or worse.
So converting from DC to AC, you have roughly 90% of what you started
with. Going from AC to DC you'll end up with 80% of what you started with.
If you want 70 watts
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
*From: *Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:03:29 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi for restaurant
AP was not re-provisioned
We have always had the disclaimer in our service agreement that it would
include taxes/surcharges if/when required by the government. Doesn't
make it taste any better, but it covers the reality.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/21/2015 6:23 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 1/21/15 18:07, Rory
Do you monitor satellite status via SNMP? We don't show any
low-satellite periods in the last week, but you might be seeing issues
due to antenna placement.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/19/2015 4:57 AM, Gabriel Pike wrote:
I had something strange happen yesterday Sunday the 18^th
AKA Ceregon IP20...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/14/2015 5:51 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Cambium 820
to me...
- Original Message -
From: Bill Prince
To: af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Gas Prices
It's Saudi Arabia trying to squeeze out all the marginal
producers.
Initially
Yah. I've read about this a couple years ago. Guess there aren't too
many WISPs in the area...
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/14/2015 7:29 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/the-town-without-wi-fi/
Yep. Note the Transamerica tower in the background (tall pyramid
building). Only building like that on the planet.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/22/2015 3:23 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
Yepone slip...adios ese! ..btw. is that San Francisco?
What version of Android? Jelly Bean, Kit Kat, Lolly Pop?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/20/2015 11:13 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Galaxy S4 First released26 April 2013; 20 months ago
Isn't this right around the ePMP development time? Granted the phone
is a whole generation back but there's
interface will work the same.
But when doing NAT you'll be able to access the radio from its public
address as well. There really is no reason to NAT at the radio with
VLANs.
Any reason you'd do NAT at the radio?
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jan 20, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Bill Prince part15
{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/20/2015 11:40 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Depends on the hardware it's on, and the hardware you're using to manage it.
On January 20, 2015 10:18:31 AM AKST, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
With all the talk, we got some of these. Put one up in our office this
morning
Says positive voltage. That says to me that negative voltages need not
apply.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 1/22/2015 12:57 PM, Erich Kaiser wrote:
So I just want to verify this will NOT work with -48vdc licensed radios?
That's a Chicago/Illinois tradition (I know Springfield is the capital,
but the people in Chicago don't really understand that).
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/10/2015 6:57 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
must be your illustrious governor. I mean he did pay for tor the
position.
Jaime Solorza
So you have a sawtooth on the H-pol? Got a plot of it? The sawtooth
pattern on interference is a classic symptom of closely, but not exactly
synced interference (like an FSK system that is slightly off in sync
timing).
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/10/2015 7:51 AM, Dan Petermann wrote:
that would be funny
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/10/2015 8:08 AM, That One Guy wrote:
have you come across anybody who tried to splice their own fiber with
redcaps like they do with Ethernet?
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Chris Fabien ch...@lakenetmi.com
mailto:ch...@lakenetmi.com
.
The construction is not trivial.
It’s very equipment and labor intensive, I would never dream
of trying to do it myself.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Monday, February 09, 2015 7:20 AM
We have a friend that has moved up there and is looking for decent internet.
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
KPP,
assuming they have gone back to their original dish design instead of
the ill advised new design they foisted upon us last year. Not cheap
but work great.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:26 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com mailto:af@afmug.com
McMaster Carr has a good selection of clamping U-blots (AKA muffler
clamps). We've used these in a lot of places.
http://www.mcmaster.com/#u-bolts/=vvbzkc
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/11/2015 1:59 PM, Peter Kranz wrote:
These are the canopy stainless mounts for mounting j-arm
Suite1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Bill Prince
part15...@gmail.com mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
No one?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/17/2015 9:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Has anyone found
On 2/17/2015 3:50 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
This site is not ABAB. It's not even AB. It is merely A. One sector;
120° wide, with about 15 subs. About as low as you can go. The
problem is that most of the subs are near the outer edges of a 120°
sector. Dividing it into 2 sectors would be an option
I think you can. We went from 12.1 - 13.2 with no problems. Only have
13.2.1 on a handful of SMs at this point.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/15/2015 3:45 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
Can i go 12.1-13.2.1? or do I need to update in steps?
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Bill Prince part15
:36 AM, Bill Prince
part15...@gmail.com wrote:
Update to 13.2 or 13.2.1. There are circumstances
where an SM will lose connectivity, and the later
SW handles this better.
bp
part15sbs
As you may or may not know, California has been in a serious drought for
the last 3 years. Interestingly, we got about 30 of rain where I live
in just December. Didn't make much a dent in the drought, but it did
turn a lot of dust into mud that flowed into culverts that had not seen
action in
.
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
We got a Chromecast to test it out, and it has some interesting
behavior.
When it's connected to our home network, it registers with a MAC
of d0:e7:82:da:fa:2c
Almost as good as George's shrink tube solution.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/12/2015 12:48 PM, Dan Petermann wrote:
Does anybody use this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9fpx5xZz6I
What are your thoughts?
It should not work with a regular POE injector. 50 watts is too much
current for 4 pins; you need to supply power on all 8 pins. And that,
in turn, requires transformers to isolate the data lines.
So I would not expect it to work at all with a vanilla POE. Well, maybe
it might work for a
direct from Packetflux
Inline image 1
Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower Consulting
er...@northcentraltower.com mailto:er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804 tel:630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291 tel:630-777-9291
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Bill Prince part15
+1
So far the Telrad stuff looks mostly like PowerPointWare.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/17/2015 8:30 AM, That One Guy wrote:
I was all about the Telrad koolaid until I sat in on a webinar and saw
the plethora of smoke and mirrors. Im concerned when a company has a
product with
And I'm used to running a whole POP with less than 50 watts.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/17/2015 10:31 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
I think that’s just for one basestation, right? So imagine 3 of them
at a site.
*From:* Bill Prince mailto:part15...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 17
one of them.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
No one?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/17/2015 9:55 AM, Bill
/17/2015 9:45 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
No one?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/17/2015 9:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Has anyone found a decent TRUE 120° dual-polarity sector in 5 GHz?
We're using a KP on one of our POPs and the drop-off at the edge of
the 120° is just too much for our taste.
No one?
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/17/2015 9:55 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Has anyone found a decent TRUE 120° dual-polarity sector in 5 GHz?
We're using a KP on one of our POPs and the drop-off at the edge of
the 120° is just too much for our taste.
Has anyone found a decent TRUE 120° dual-polarity sector in 5 GHz? We're
using a KP on one of our POPs and the drop-off at the edge of the 120°
is just too much for our taste.
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
Wow. 90 watts? Gulp. Even 85 would be hard to swallow. I blanch with
AF24 at 50 watts.
Takes a lot of infrastructure to run that kind of stuff on a solar site.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/17/2015 10:14 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
If I recall correctly, the 1000 was the only choice that
crimp...
It doesn't seem to hurt most power supplies, but I always try to be
quick about it when I do it... it all depends on the situation though,
in some cases it isn't worth the risk even if it is small.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15
We have used those for a while. We also use DC4 in the coupler inside,
and then wrap the outside with silicon tape. They have lasted for years
without leaks/failures.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/19/2015 8:53 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Manufacturer: Bulgin PX0777/UTPCurrent Rating: 1.5
://www.mtesolutionsinc.com/11802-Ceramic-Scissors-5-p/11802.htm
-Original Message- From: Bill Prince
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 12:22 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cat5/6 POE splicing while live?
Gotta be careful. If you cut across all the pairs at the same time, you
Local phone guy was using something like that for keeping most of the
twist in his twisted pairs.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/19/2015 9:56 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Sounds like they are referring to this:
http://www.alliedelec.com/3m-u1r/70112963/
*From:* Nate Burke
I think I agree.
We've used the Bulgin jobs for a long time, and they work very well.
However, with the Bulgin you have to terminate the ends after you've
threaded the glands/nuts on.
This one looks like you can terminate the ends before assembly.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On
ePMP. I thought this would sync with the latest 450 software?
Also I have some Arc adjustable on the shelf if you would like to try one.
Adam
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2015 5:13 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG
Douglas Adams had the answer years ago.
42
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/16/2015 3:19 PM, That One Guy wrote:
Theoretically, based on current bits/hz maximums, and assuming there
was a radio capable, and an antenna capable, with no other
limitations. What is the maximum throughput of
Given a choice I would go to (1) Liz Creekmore, (2) Radyn, (3) Comsearch.
They all do good work, but Liz makes it more personal.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On 2/16/2015 1:14 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Who is the frequency coordinator of choice these days for licensed links?
Some Belkin routers do have a bridge mode. Check to see if it is set
for bridging or routing. Likewise, when Apple routers see a private IP
on the WAN interface, will by default go into bridging mode. Most other
routers that I know of just do routing.
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On
and never had an issue. Let us know how your testing goes.
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
mailto:part15...@gmail.com wrote:
AP was not re-provisioned. She had to re-connect to continue to
use it. She said the connection just went away
: *Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Wednesday, January 21, 2015 2:07:07 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] WiFi for restaurant
Run it where? The colo? That seems counter productive. We want a
more-or-less continuous VPN connection between our colo and the WiFi
AP in our office
.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
I see one thing that could be smoother. We set up a couple of Unifi APs;
one here in our office, and another in a large home. The controller was on
my traveling laptop. Now that each of them is running, I wanted to move
a bit too big and we are about to split it into multiple
pieces. It's an adventure.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Bill Prince part15...@gmail.com wrote:
I see one thing that could be smoother. We set up a couple of Unifi APs;
one here in our office, and another in a large home. The controller
1 - 100 of 2800 matches
Mail list logo
