ame
> Travis!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:37 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [AFMUG] Ammon City Fiber
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the new fiber network that has been developed over
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Ammon City Fiber
Hi,
Here is the new fiber network that has been developed over the last 6 years in
a suburb of Idaho Falls. A quick breakdown:
Fiber install = $3,000 to the homeowner, or financed at $15/month as a bond
against the property for 20 years.
Fiber
Hi,
Here is the new fiber network that has been developed over the last 6
years in a suburb of Idaho Falls. A quick breakdown:
Fiber install = $3,000 to the homeowner, or financed at $15/month as a
bond against the property for 20 years.
Fiber transport for 100Mbps = $25/month to the city
It kind of depends on what the majority of people in the entire country thinks
ought to be standard levels of infrastructure. If you live in the country,
which things are you willing to not have just because there aren't as many
people to distribute the cost for? Certainly street lights aren't
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> I rail against these types of projects not because they typically fail,
> which they do,
That's the second time you make that claim. Could you please back this up
with some sources?
>>>Do you mind enlightening us with all the tales of success and glory?
That only takes a little while when you very good at it
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016, 9:07 PM Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> Don't mayors keep busy groping, sextng, using private email servers ,
> building walls, servicing council members wives and collecting money from
> speed
Not yet, they're still in training. Have to work your way up from the speed
traps and voter polling place harassment.
On Oct 31, 2016 9:07 PM, "Jaime Solorza" wrote:
> Don't mayors keep busy groping, sextng, using private email servers ,
> building walls, servicing
Don't mayors keep busy groping, sextng, using private email servers ,
building walls, servicing council members wives and collecting money from
speed traps? How could you be bored Lewis?
On Oct 31, 2016 5:27 PM, "Lewis Bergman" wrote:
> I'll reply only because I'm
I'll reply only because I'm bored.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016, 5:15 PM wrote:
> Lewis Bergman wrote:
> >>> I rail against these types of projects not because they typically
> fail, which they do,
> >> That's the second time you make that claim. Could you please back this
> up with
-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 4:15 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Lewis Bergman wrote:
I rail against these types of projects not because they typically fail,
which they do,
That's the second time you make that claim. Could you please
Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>> I rail against these types of projects not because they typically fail,
>>> which they do,
>> That's the second time you make that claim. Could you please back this up
>>with some sources?
>Do you mind enlightening us with all the tales of success and glory?
Excellent
rted for leaving his dogs outside in the winter. Those
> dogs had never been in the house in their entire lives.
>
> Odd study in human behavior. I think it all boils down to selfishness and
> lack of empathy.
>
>
>
> *From:* Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2
. I think it all boils down to selfishness
and lack of empathy.
*From:* Jason McKemie
*Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2016 3:30 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Who cares? Really...who cares. They chose to live somewhere without
internet. You want internet,
down to selfishness and lack
of empathy.
From: Jason McKemie
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Who cares? Really...who cares. They chose to live somewhere without internet.
You want internet, move somewhere with it. Your
down to selfishness and lack
of empathy.
From: Jason McKemie
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Who cares? Really...who cares. They chose to live somewhere without internet.
You want internet, move somewhere with it. Your job isn't there
>
> Who cares? Really...who cares. They chose to live somewhere without
> internet. You want internet, move somewhere with it. Your job isn't there?
> OK, guess you get to use internet when you visit the kids in the big city.
> So you don't have internet. Who gives a damn? I am pretty sure oxygen
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:23 AM wrote:
> Lewis Bergman wrote:
> > I rail against these types of projects not because they typically fail,
> which they do,
> That's the second time you make that claim. Could you please back this
> up with some sources?
>
Do you mind
I believe so.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:53:31 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG]
Do they still have free WiFi from the streetlights in town?
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:48 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
RMU fixed wireless is largely dead. I tried picking it up when
No doubt, but I believe we were discussing public fiber networks.
Jared
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 at 6:26 PM
> From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> No doubt all the muni-wifi projects
" <af...@kwisp.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:45:29 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Municipal utilities are probably best off deploying fiber because it fits their
model of infrastructure that you can install and forget for 20+ years.
Something I think t
...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:27 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
No doubt all the muni-wifi projects failed.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 10:23 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re
No doubt all the muni-wifi projects failed.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 10:23 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Lewis Bergman wrote:
I rail against these types of projects not because they typically fail,
which
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> I rail against these types of projects not because they typically fail, which
> they do,
That's the second time you make that claim. Could you please back this up
with some sources?
Could you also shine some light on those federal bailout programs you say are
paying
31, 2016, 8:16 AM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>> In this case Lewis, I can assure you that Roger does indeed
>> comprehend/understand it. He is one of us when it comes to the technical
>> side of things.
>>
>> *From:* Lewis Bergman
>> *Sent:* Monday, O
hen it comes to the technical
> side of things.
>
> *From:* Lewis Bergman
> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2016 6:54 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> When does pricing get so high and service get so terrible that government
&
In this case Lewis, I can assure you that Roger does indeed
comprehend/understand it. He is one of us when it comes to the technical side
of things.
From: Lewis Bergman
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
When does pricing get so
When does pricing get so high and service get so terrible that government
has to step in to provide a service that is not integral to any life, limb,
or pursuit of happiness?
Don't get me wrong, if the citizens of whatever jurisdiction want to
succumb to the wiles of some huckster (yea kids, I
It is a very political discussion that will likely never result in any form
of consensus, especially among this group because of financial interests
involved, as to whether or not government should be involved in building
fiber networks. However, from my perspective (and UTOPIA Fiber's),
interest
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016, 6:19 PM wrote:
> Lewis Bergman wrote:
> > At the root is that you somehow believe government involvement is always
> good.
> Now don't you go putting words in my mouth!
> I never said such a thing.
>
You have made a case for it
I do not think
you need fiber? Everybody can get
> hughesnet.
>
>
> The county should run water and gas first.
>
>
> -Original Message- From: fiber...@mail.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 4:52 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> Chuck
Chuck writes:
> You have wireless internet why do you need fiber? Everybody can get
> hughesnet.
Have you actually used satellite internet?
The punishment for advocating that position is to have to use only satellite
internet u tik you cry uncle. :)
> The county should run water and gas
> Electricity costs 4 x NG.
Distribution costs money. New infrastructure costs money. The price of
commodities fluctuates.
Is it still four times cheaper when you factor in all that?
Don't ask me, I'm not a gas guy.
> What does more of the people, gas or fiber?
Any reason you can't
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> At the root is that you somehow believe government involvement is always good.
Now don't you go putting words in my mouth!
I never said such a thing.
I do not think government involvement is always good. Neither do I believe
that government involvement is always
You have wireless internet why do you need fiber? Everybody can get
hughesnet.
The county should run water and gas first.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 4:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Chuck wrote:
Why
Electricity costs 4 x NG. What does more of the people, gas or fiber?
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 4:52 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Chuck wrote:
Why should the county not choose to build out natural gas
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Chuck wrote:
> Why should the county not choose to build out natural gas to everyone?
> That would save them all lots of money, that would be a real benefit.
> Why fiber not gas?
Because gas can easily be substituted for an o
Chuck wrote:
> Why should the county not choose to build out natural gas to everyone? That
> would save them all lots of money, that would be a real benefit. Why fiber
> not gas?
Because gas can easily be substituted for an other form of energy, like
electricity? And everybody's already got
al Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 4:48 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Chuck writes:
Unless you chose the federal cost of money rate, it has been about 1% for
13
years and counting.
My bad. I've never taken RUS money so I wouldn't know.
Chuck writes:
> Unless you chose the federal cost of money rate, it has been about 1% for 13
> years and counting.
My bad. I've never taken RUS money so I wouldn't know.
Can you point me in the right direction?
Jared
] Ammon City fiber
Chuck wrote:
Why does it have to be open?
It does not have to be, but if one party offers dark fiber rental and the
other does not, then they are not competing directly on all levels. Open
access also opens up the market to a different level of competition, which
may or may
Unless you chose the federal cost of money rate, it has been about 1% for 13
years and counting.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2016 1:49 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Lewis Bergman wrote:
Chuck mentioned 1% rates
At the root is that you somehow believe government involvement is always
good. History doesn't back you up, especially where broadband is concerned.
Government, most any government, does a pretty poor job if what it should
be doing much less tasks it has no business doing.
You sound like someone
Chuck wrote:
> Why does it have to be open?
It does not have to be, but if one party offers dark fiber rental and the
other does not, then they are not competing directly on all levels. Open access
also opens up the market to a different level of competition, which may or may
not be a goal.
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> Chuck mentioned 1% rates for RUS. Definitely below market.
Here are the current RUS interest rates:
http://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/services/rural-utilities-loan-interest-rates#BaseRates
Looks like a 30 year bond rate is 2.6-4.425%.
> Are you saying that
ww.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ----------
> *From: *"Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:41:36 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> Compound question.
&
October 29, 2016 10:41:36 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Compound question.
They open up market to content providers and others that do not own
infrastructure in a given area. Similar to the whole CLEC idea 20 years
ago. But this time the facility owners are not forced to share,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 5:48 PM wrote:
> Lewis Bergman Wrote:
> > First, a subsidized rate below market is still cost.
> Who said anything about below market rates? Municipal bond rates are set
> by the market.
>
Chuck mentioned 1% rates for RUS. Definitely below market. If
Lewis Bergman Wrote:
> First, a subsidized rate below market is still cost.
Who said anything about below market rates? Municipal bond rates are set by
the market.
> I have seen the size of Comcast. And concatenation uses its own money not
> mine.
I beg to differ. It's not like Comcast
First, a subsidized rate below market is still cost. Maybe to those who do
accounting the way the government does it is zero cost. If the rate you
could get us 4% below the bond rate you just subsidized (or spent) 4%. I
really don'tunderstand why that is difficult to comprehend.
I have seen the
I am getting >80% and it is still growing.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 4:00 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Depends on how confident you are in your market projections. Some would say
build the temporary solut
Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Depends on how confident you are in your market projections.
True.
However, if we were to spend a trillion dollars on wiring the nation, I think
we could spare a few dollars to hire some guys with some applicable skills that
could get it right, on average.
Internet
; From: ch...@wbmfg.com
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> If big money is being spent, spend it on fiber. He who brings fiber to the
> home wins the whole game. Been saying that for years.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: fiber...@mail
?
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 4:48 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Bill Prince wrote:
> We are now debating this same thing with regard to internet service,
> and further w
Rory Conaway wrote:
> Long term, the result of the government proving any kind of service and
> destroying the free-enterprise or a
> competitive market
Hold up! Before we take the above as a given, we'll have to establish a few
facts.
- will government proving *any* kind of service
If big money is being spent, spend it on fiber. He who brings fiber to the
home wins the whole game. Been saying that for years.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 3:48 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Bill Prince
Bill Prince wrote:
> We are now debating this same thing with regard to internet service, and
> further whether it should or should not be provided over fiber.
>
> I sit firmly on the fence on that last one.
I'm not. I'm firmly in the NO camp.
Fiber is just a tool. There is nothing magical
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> Government is rarely small at the level where it competes with an enterprise,
> be it local or otherwise.
You are kidding me, right?
Have you seen the size of Comcast?
> My apologies. Railing against government as a solution instead of the pariah
> it normally
: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
It kind of depends on what the majority of people in the entire country thinks
ought to be standard levels of infrastructure.
If you live in the country, which things are you willing to not have just
because there aren't as many people to distribute the cost
It kind of depends on what the majority of people in the entire country
thinks ought to be standard levels of infrastructure.
If you live in the country, which things are you willing to not have
just because there aren't as many people to distribute the cost for?
Certainly street lights
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 3:18 PM wrote:
> Lewis Bergman wrote:
> > I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a problem.
> In all fairness, we are talking about fairly small projects done by
> local governments. It's not like there is a Big Bad Fiber Network
Ken Hohhof wrote:
> One issue is cherry picking, if a fiber deployment will only serve the
> easiest or most lucrative customers,
> that tells existing providers they should switch to differential pricing
> where the less desirable customers
> have to pay more. Or just shut down when the
can’t decipher “dem to be a touchy”.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman
*Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:49 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a
problem. It just
Lewis Bergman wrote:
> I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a problem.
In all fairness, we are talking about fairly small projects done by local
governments. It's not like there is a Big Bad Fiber Network being built by the
Feds.
> It just always that is a fairly
“dem to be a touchy”.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:49 PM
>
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
>
>
> I understand the attractiveness of the big government
OK, you need better auto correct. I can’t decipher “dem to be a touchy”.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:49 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I understand the attractiveness of the big government
a wedding cake, what happened to that nice bakery I used to buy
muffins at?
-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:48 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Chuck,
Thanks for taking
I understand the attractiveness of the big government to solve a problem.
It just always that is a fairly poor short term solution and an even worse
long term one that always serves to stifle innovationand extend the life of
entities that should already be out of business.
I live in a rural area
Chuck,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
> I am not wholly against muni fiber systems in concept. But harm to existing
> service providers must be mitigated.
A publicly funded fiber network is years in the making. It should not come as
a surprise to any local business. WISPs are
Sounds like someone should read Atlas Shrugged
>
> Why not. If the government wants to help commerce, it should help
> commerce.
> If they can pay farmers for not farming, they should pay WISPS they injure.
> If they wipe out service providers they should be forced to buy them out.
> Just like
> I'd just like to see how the whole cost structure comes out
$5 per MST port (12k MSTs total)
$100 per NAP port (2.6k NAPs total)
$3500 per bckbone fiber strand
Prices are 40% higher for small (<40k) or low density (<80 subs per mile)
deployments.
Google pays $208k per month.
, October 29, 2016 1:34 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I am not wholly against muni fiber systems in concept. But harm to existing
service providers must be mitigated. They must be allowed to connect for free
and be given some kind of pioneers preference such as no MRC
Message-
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 12:28 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
What's stopping the WISP from using the same government fiber to provide
service?
They've already got the advantage as they are established and have the
customers
-
From: Roger Timmerman
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Most of what Chuck says is true about the first phase of UTOPIA. It was a
disaster. Some of it was their fault, some of it wasn't.
For example, AT was actual
What's stopping the WISP from using the same government fiber to provide
service?
They've already got the advantage as they are established and have the
customers.
Cost to connect, MRC costs while you build to break even, loss of margin
and ARPU per customer.
But yes, they compete with
> Great if I am a provider of services, and then I can come into your area,
> compete with you wireless system, using guvmnt provided fiber...
What's stopping the WISP from using the same government fiber to provide
service?
They've already got the advantage as they are established and have
to everyone.
I see zero downside. The nation was just coming out of the great depression
when this program started. How is this any different than the SBA?
From: Lewis Bergman
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:48 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
A loan at sub market
11:33 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I think that the Rural Electrification Administration (REA, later
renamed the RUS) was probably the best government program ever
created. You could borrow at 1% or 2%, buil
turday, October 29, 2016 11:33 AM
>
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
>
>
> I think that the Rural Electrification Administration (REA, later renamed
> the RUS) was probably the best government program ever created. You could
> borrow a
Good thing they didn’t loan people money to build hotels or casinos.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 11:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I think that the Rural Electrification Administration (REA
t;
> *From:* Lewis Bergman
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2016 10:11 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
>
> I am confused. I don't know why anyone should get government money for not
> doing something or being unable to compete. Of course once the
29, 2016 10:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
I am confused. I don't know why anyone should get government money for not
doing something or being unable to compete. Of course once the government gets
involved in subsidizing anything it skews the whole market so it's
i and govt fiber systems
> should
> do the same thing for the WISPS they are hurting...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: fiber...@mail.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 7:34 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> C
.com
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 7:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Chuck,
Do you feel government built/owned last mile open acces dark fiber networks
are a detriment to the market and/or compete with private companies?
Jared
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 at 11:
Chuck,
Do you feel government built/owned last mile open acces dark fiber networks are
a detriment to the market and/or compete with private companies?
Jared
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 at 11:37 PM
> From: ch...@wbmfg.com
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fi
How much of the first bond is left to pay?
Jared
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 at 12:42 AM
From: "Roger Timmerman" <timmer...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
As far as the first bond, the cities are covering it for now. We could be
c
it then it pays for itself.
Of course airports receive huge amounts of federal money. Most do not stand on
their own.
From: Roger Timmerman
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 3:38 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
A couple of comments below from my perspective...
-Roger
On Fri
iday, October 28, 2016 at 8:37 PM
> From: "Roger Timmerman" <timmer...@gmail.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> Most of what Chuck says is true about the first phase of UTOPIA. It was a
> disaster. Some of it was their fault, some of it
A couple of comments below from my perspective...
-Roger
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:17 PM, wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
> > They honestly expected Qwest and Comcast to ride their network.
> What alternate reality do these people live in?
>
*That was never likely to happen because
From: fiber...@mail.com
by government. Arguably water and sewer. I have lived in cities with two
power companies. But all the rest should be done by commercial providers.
Why do you draw the line at the utilities and the infrastructure you
listed? What makes them so special?
Duplication
Chuck wrote:
> They honestly expected Qwest and Comcast to ride their network.
What alternate reality do these people live in?
> I personally am philosophically opposed to governments providing goods or
> services that private companies can do. Obviously streets are better done
> by
I was wondering the same thing. I am guessing the cities are eating it.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 2:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Thank you Roger for that detailed write up.
What happened to the first
essage- From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 2:08 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Thank you Roger for that detailed write up.
What happened to the first phase bond?
Jared
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 at 8:37 PM
From: "Roger Timmerman" <
Thank you Roger for that detailed write up.
What happened to the first phase bond?
Jared
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 at 8:37 PM
From: "Roger Timmerman" <timmer...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Most of what Chuck says is true about
t;
>
>
> -----Original Message- From: fiber...@mail.com
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 1:49 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
>
> Chuck McCown wrote:
>
>> Utopia tried that method in Brigham City and it didn't work so well (for a
>
unfair advantages.
-Original Message-
From: fiber...@mail.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 1:49 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Chuck McCown wrote:
Utopia tried that method in Brigham City and it didn't work so well (for a
variety of reasons).
Did UTOPIA
Well, the mayor and city council said it didn’t work so well. This was 4
years ago or so. I was there multiple times by invitation.
From: Roger Timmerman
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Not sure why anyone would say
Hi,
That is correct... all the providers bring their connections into the
main NOC for the city (brand new facility). So you have to get transport
there, but then you are billing the customer directly for whatever
services they want from you. It looks like 100Mbps residential will be
around
t;lists.wavel...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 8:47:41 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ammon City fiber
Can a WISP like us even compete in the city of Ammon? I assume that this fiber
all goes to some sort of Central Office building and any carrier that wants to
co
Can a WISP like us even compete in the city of Ammon? I assume that this
fiber all goes to some sort of Central Office building and any carrier that
wants to come into town can then run a line into this building and sell on
the FTTH plant. So in reality the only providers that can compete is
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo