Any chance your techs put a customer on the opposite facing AP?
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015, Paul McCall wrote:
> That’s kinda what I was thinking… that it seems GPS Sync related even
> though the stats looked normal.
>
>
>
> As for as a Beta product, we were an early adopter and find it pretty
Does a MIB exist for the Nanostation?
-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jan 23, 2015 11:28 AM, "Eric Muehleisen" wrote:
>
>> Does a MIB exist for the Nanostation?
>>
>
n
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jan 23, 2015 11:37 AM, "Eric Muehleisen" wrote:
>
>> Looking through the forum 5.6beta9 is the latest. You feel it's stable
>> enough to run production
an
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jan 23, 2015 11:50 AM, "Eric Muehleisen" wrote:
>
>> No SNMP reporting is a problem.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>
I've noticed in our wireless router testing that many router
manufacturers advertise 802.11ac wave2 support but are not certified
to operate in the UNII-2 bands. My understanding is wave 2 channel
bonds two 80mhz channels. Can UNII-1 and UNII-3 be bonded to create a
160mhz channel for wave 2 certif
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Eric Muehleisen
> wrote:
> > I've noticed in our wireless router testing that many router
> > manufacturers advertise 802.11ac wave2 support but are not certified
> > to operate in the UNII-2 bands. My understanding is wave 2 chann
We host a speedtest.net server and use the iphone app. Very accurate. If
you don't like the app, give their HTML beta test a try. It's been quite
accurate in our experience. http://beta.speedtest.net/
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:08 PM, D. Ryan Spott wrote:
> Are you doing heatmaps or just provin
Any idea if the TDWR band will be available on the 450 as well as 450i?
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Vlad Sedov wrote:
> We have it on a 450/450i cluster. No problems so far, though too early to
> tell. No bricks, thank Dog.
>
> This build enables the TDWR band (5600-5650) on the 450i, which
Here is a basic template I made a while back. Includes interface stats, RX
& TX power and data rates.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:53 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, she's a good girl, doesn't ask for much, not into spankings or
> anything, so no adventures, bu
CactiEZ. Couldn't be easier. http://cactiez.cactiusers.org/
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:49 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IT would be exceptionally valuable if there were a base vm with a wizard
> based initial setup provided with it. Every time ive gone to set up
We've been able to work things out with the local power company and don't
notice an issue. The radios that point back to the mothership chirp very
quietly unless they are receiving a software/firmware upgrade. We worked it
out that they only perform updates to their system during maintenance
window
We have a home with a Linksys 1900 router and they are having 2.4ghz AP
issues. They have 15 clients connected including a Vivint SkyControl
security panel. We noticed when we change the Linksys channel, the Vivint
panel will change with it, as does the SSID it broadcasts.
I believe the Vivint con
Has anyone done the work in Cacti to extract the AdaptRate into an integer
for easier graphing? The current output is "VC 19 Rate 8X/8X MIMO-B". This
makes me crazy that Cambium does it this way.
OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.2.2.20
> the SMs. And with ever changing LUIDs, it's not worth my time to make an AP
> session status template.
>
>
> On 4/5/2016 8:40 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
>
>> Has anyone done the work in Cacti to extract the AdaptRate into an
>> integer for easier graphing? The cur
[image: Inline image 1]
Downlink: 1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0
Uplink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.2.0
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sam Lambie wrote:
> I am looking through the MIBS file on 14.1.2 for Cambium 450 gear and
> don't see any OIDS for Frame utilization. Is it possible to gra
0
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Eric Muehleisen
> wrote:
>
>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>
>> Downlink: 1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0
>> Uplink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12
Interesting. The majority of our 900 subs are located in prime smart
meter territory. I've worked with several of the power companies
across western Kansas and they all run a version of Landis Gyr meters
with is FHSS 900 ISM (see pic here
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1578608/Public/smart_met
And free internet to look up the pharmacy phone number.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Christopher Tyler
wrote:
> And a free cell phone so they can call the pharmacy.
>
> --
> Christopher Tyler
> MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
> Total Highspeed Internet Services
> 417.851.1107
>
> - Original Mess
Netspot for MacOS is the best one I've used. I got the pro version for $20
during a promo last month.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:27 AM, David wrote:
> What is everyone using for in building heat mapping tools?
>
>
> --
>
Been trying to download the spec sheet from Cambium and it fails. Fed
up. Can anyone send it offlist please?
David, do you have a picture of the conduit on the tower? I'd like to
see how it looks. What size conduit do you typically run?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:27 PM, David wrote:
> I dont get the extreme cold that you get josh but I have delt with what you
> are talking about and
> Now that we have mo
Never heard of this and we have over a 1000 320 SM's in the air. There
was an issue with cold-snap on the AP that caused reboots (old
hardware rev). Is that not the same issue?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:06 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
wrote:
> did anybody ever find a resoltion that doesnt involve sw
I had the same question. I'm considering changing an AP from 2.5ms to
5ms. I'm aware of the doubled latency, but I'm more interested in the
additional 7mb/s downlink (according to 450 capacity planner).
We have an AP with ~50 subs and it reaches 100% downlink every
evening. I'm considering changin
e
> frame for just a little bit more speed. you'll end up back at 100% capacity
> in no time with the frame tweaks. with adding an AP that should solve the
> problem for at least a year.
>
> 2 cents
>
> -Sean
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Eric Muehleis
iding some breathing room.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
> is adding an AP physically tough (tower space, winter time etc.) or
> logically tough (not enough spectrum)?
>
> just curious
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Eric Muehleisen
> wrote:
Really, gotta fix those 1X and 2X subs.
>
> Can you add an AP in 5.1 GHz?
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Eric Muehleisen
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 1:42 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 5ms frame on 450
>
> All of the above. This particular
Looking into deploying 450i 900mhz at a site but wanted to do
comprehensive spectrum analysis first. Thought about using a Canopy
900 integrated SM and have it run in continuously. Has anyone done
anything like this before? Did you get the expected results?
If you leave spectrum analyzer running c
wrote:
> I have one of the old ubnt airview 900mhz USB sas hooked to a 11db yagi I
> like for this to do sweeps
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
>>
>> Looking into deploying 450i 900mhz at a site but wanted to do
>> comprehensive spectrum a
gt;
> -Sean
>
> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
>>
>> Looking into deploying 450i 900mhz at a site but wanted to do
>> comprehensive spectrum analysis first. Thought about using a Canopy
>> 900 integrated SM and have it run in continuously.
It would be a nice feature if you could click a button and temporarily
flood the RF link on all SM's so that 'link status' could be
accurately measured for uplink and downlink. This would be
particularly useful when trying to track down those SM's with poor
modulation that are a drag on the frame u
Our techs are instructed to contact the NOC before and after they
arrive onsite. The tech supplies the ETA to the NOC and the NOC
follows up at the given ETA.
Our NOC is staffed 24x7. YMMV.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Steve D wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I want to evaluate some different options
What's the rule on tower lights? If bulbs burn out, do you have a
grace period to fix it?
re.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
>>
>> What's the rule on tower lights? If bulbs burn out, do you have a
>> grace period to fix it?
>
>
I would expect that under certain circumstances the polarization could be a
difference of +/- 5dB. We've found that at 900mhz vpol is better when going
through a forest. YMMV
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Neil Smellie wrote:
> Gino, I have this from a older presentation
>
> Vegetation Loss –
We ask for exclusive rights to certain frequency bands when leasing
towers or structures. Nearly half of our sites are this way. Could
they have something in their lease verbiage to reflect this?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Ty Featherling
wrote:
> We have a co-tennant on a water tower sayin
Make sure to set your TX power and external gain correctly. I believe the
DFS detection algorithm takes into account external gain setting.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:34 PM, George Skorup wrote:
> What version are you running? I'd say that's a bug.
>
> As far as the DFS hits, there are lots of r
We still use it. Tons of it. However, we are not doing any new builds or
installing any new customers. Purely maintenance mode at this point. Hoping
something better comes along that we can migrate to.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:08 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Im
Uplink looks good. Does this only affect downlink? First thought would be
self-interference but that usually doesn't show up in the radio stats but
rather packet loss in the service flow stats. During a maintenance window,
shut down all your AP's and run a spectrum analysis one-by-one. I would
susp
Is it safe to say that upgrading a P8 SM remotely to 13.4 is ok as long as
you are not using NAT?
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> Chitrang - where do you want the bricks?
>
> Just for you we pulled the engineering.cgi from a 12.2 and a 13.1.3 P8 FSK
> radio and then bric
We do it with great success. We get ours from L-Com. They show in stock.
http://www.l-com.com/bandpass-filter-rf-splitter-2-way-35-ghz-signal-splitter-n-female-connectors
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Maybe the universe is telling you to stop doing that?
>
> *From:*
If the picture in the email ad is any indication, it looks more like a
nanostation form factor. Wouldn't that limit it's antenna size back down
into sub 5ghz land?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
> If not Streakwave, I would bet that you could find someone else that would
>
I believe this still works...
The Reboot Unit Tool in CNUT can be scheduled using the Windows Task
Scheduler or cron as follows:
The Command Line for launching the Tools is:
java -cp tools/CNUTResetUnit.jar ResetUnitTool.src.ResetUnit <
devicelist.txt
The devicelist.txt is a text file formatted
+1 on Wineskin. Very simple to wrap winbox.exe or STG.exe into Mac .apps. I
also use Parallels with Windows 7 and leave it constantly running in the
background. It gives my 16gb or RAM something to do. I game with my boys
and use Parallels for that. Excellent performance.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:
Are you saying that antenna patterns could have a significant difference
between 5740 and 5780 on some antennas?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
> And that plot is for one specific frequency. They frequently do not
> tell you the test frequency. I have had antennas have
Can anyone recommend a hand held spectrum analyzer that a novice could
operate effectively? Must be capable of connecting external antennas and
must support 2ghz up to 6ghz.
Look up 3M ScotchLok. Our guys use them all the time. I once used them to
splice together a 300ft. CAT5 cable running up the tower that was cut at
the base by a tower climber. Worked great for temporary use.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Jay Weekley
wrote:
> I was curious about that product
Jerry, do you have any personal experience with this unit?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Jerry Richardson
wrote:
> http://www.aaronia.com/
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 19, 2015 6:46 AM
&g
We had a 900mhz omni antenna with rusted elements spitting out 700mhz. We
were colo'd with Verizon on the same tower.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Peter Kranz wrote:
> Had an AT&T contractor show up at one of our datacenter sites today and
> claim that one of our radio systems was emitting a
Take a look at Homeplug or BPL devices. We recently reviewed a few Homeplug
v2 adapters with WiFi. They performed quite nicely. We are using them to
extend IPTV throughout houses that can't be wired. In most cases we could
perform 4 HD multicast streams. So between 40-60mb/s.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 a
Cisco speak:
Untagged:
switchport mode access
switchport access vlan 10
Tagged:
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 20
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
Mixed mode:
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20 (tagged)
switchpo
y 2
> cents.
>
>
>
> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc.
>
> den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:11 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
We run PPPoE and use PPPoE only filters and filter out Bootp server in all
CPE gear. To detect rogue clients spewing DHCP around, we uplink a Mikrotik
router to an untagged DHCP port in our switch and run the DHCP-Server Alert
feature. This way we get an alert when someone plugs their router in
bac
Has anyone conducted this test yet? 450 might be getting closer to the NLOS
capabilities of the 320 because of the recent added features like 5ms
framing and MIMO-A. A side-by-side comparison would be nice.
-Eric
So all things being equal between the two AP's, TX power, channel size,
antenna gain...the 320 still outperforms the 450 in NLOS?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> On 3/17/15 2:29 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
>
>> Has anyone conducted this test yet? 450
Thanks Mark! I suspect you're using 13.3 code and 5ms framing?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> On 3/17/15 2:29 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
>
>> Has anyone conducted this test yet? 450 might be getting closer to the
>> NLOS capabilities of the 32
There is shooting through trees. Then there is shooting through trees with
leaves on them. Then there is shooting through trees with leaves on them on
a windy day.
These numbers don't mean to me. Retest in mid-June and post those numbers.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Patrick Leary
wrote:
>
mean to say...don't mean *much* to me
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Eric Muehleisen
wrote:
> There is shooting through trees. Then there is shooting through trees with
> leaves on them. Then there is shooting through trees with leaves on them on
> a windy day.
>
> Thes
e, please make that known and I'll
> not share it.
>
>
>
> *Patrick Leary*
>
> *M* 727.501.3735
>
> <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 19,
+1 for Adam and David. We have a blend of CMM4 and CTM2's. My plant techs
love the CTM2's because of their simplicity and design. However, our CMM4's
just work. Never have blown ports. CTM2's are prone to port failure and
have management issues.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:43 AM, David wrote:
> I
Any ideas if UBNT will come out with a dualband version of their
picostationM ?
My techs love using pico's to extend wireless coverage in homes. I like the
idea of Unifi, but it must support stand-alone firmware, which doesn't look
like it's going to happen.
running a wire anyways right? The E900 linksys routers
>> that we get for dirt cheap have a bridge mode that can be configured
>> easily. They seem dependable and fast enough so far (we've been using them
>> for around a year I think)
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at
ffice: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Eric Muehleisen
> wrote:
>
>> Not a fan of that linksys design. We love the picostationM2HP's because
>> they have a 1000mw radio
ifi/unifi-cloud-key/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> MSRP I heard was 79$.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise.. your running a wire anyways right? The E900 linksys routers
>>>> that we get for dirt cheap have a bridge mode that can be configure
hat does not require controller...or the
> UniFi Cloud Key
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Eric Muehleisen
> wrote:
>
>> I love the unifi hardware, just not the software/controller idea.
>> Standalone software would give it much more flexibility IMO.
>>
>> O
Sent offline
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Lewis Bergman
wrote:
> Does anyone have the latest SW? I ought some used units and they have
> different versions on them.
>
We keep our equipment in enclosures so they are protected and not tampered
with.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> Any of you guys have bugs causing outages? Our boxes are all pretty well
> sealed, but our commercial tower site that we lease space on is packed full
> of Box Elder
We had an unusual issue with Trango 900 AP's not ARPing to the correct
gateway. This only happened on sites that aggregate back to our Cisco
7200 LACs. Our LAC would host several 192.168.x.x management networks
but only the Trango couldn't answer their gateway unless pointed to
the primary gateway
Kiwi syslog has tons of alarming options. Not free but it's a good option.
On Friday, October 30, 2015, Adam Moffett wrote:
> I have a vendor provided NMS that receives craploads of SNMP traps and I'm
> not super happy with it's capabilities for filtering and exporting that
> data. It also can'
m disclosure. Any review,
> dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by
> unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly
> prohibited.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
> Sent: Friday, No
omers with strong signals.
>
> On Nov 6, 2015 12:21 PM, "Eric Muehleisen" wrote:
>>
>> Tyson,
>> 1. We are using Cambium stock 65* dualslant antennas.
>> 2. Mix of routers. We have a BYOR (bring your own router) policy.
>> 3. All AP's are sync'd
>
> A better scenario if you can manage it is to hang the 450 alongside the FSK
> and then only move the heavy customers with strong signals.
>
> On Nov 6, 2015 12:21 PM, "Eric Muehleisen" wrote:
>>
>> Tyson,
>> 1. We are using Cambium stock 65* dualsl
I believe the very latest LMG CTM2 hardware revision will allow for
PTP600. None of my CTM2's have this capabiliy, even with latest
software.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Paul McCall wrote:
> Can a PTP600 be easily powered off a CMM3/CMM4 or CTM/CTM2 ?
>
>
>
> Any downside?
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
Cisco has a very broad operating temperature range. Never had a single
issue in our non-enviro cabinets. Not a cheap alternative.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, wrote:
> Need a hardened switch for mounting in an outdoor enclosure that will not
> have environmental controls over perhaps a fan.
Put the AP in a VLAN and mark 802.1p at 7 either in the AP at the switchport.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
> Anyone?
I do the same. You don't need to include the wine bottler files if you
have it installed already. That will cut down your file size quite a
bit. Also, the new winbox 3 will upgrade versions for you even if it's
bottled up.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:01 PM, D. Ryan Spott wrote:
> I just use winebot
We have a situation where an AirFiber is struggling to maintain a
gigabit ethernet connection. It's right next to a FM antenna. We've
replaced the ~75ft. patch cable with belden shielded CAT5 and shielded
ends. We've replaced the cable a couple time now. It will run gigabit
in good conditions, but
> loading bars to be a royal pain. I believe Best-Tronics uses exclusively
> Tyco/AMP plugs.
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Eric Muehleisen
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 8:51 AM
>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [AFMUG] CAT5e or CAT6 shielded outdoor patch
Kevin at Primus. We used it
>> for 300' runs successfully
>>
>> Rory
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:52 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>&g
om> wrote:
> Just curious, are there surge supressors anywhere in the circuit?
> On Nov 18, 2015 8:51 AM, "Eric Muehleisen" > wrote:
>
>> We have a situation where an AirFiber is struggling to maintain a
>> gigabit ethernet connection. It's right next to a FM a
https://winscp.net/eng/docs/guide_schedule
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Wireless Administrator
wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a quality FTP Client with the following features?
>
>
>
> Windows based
>
> Scripting
>
> Scheduling
>
> SFTP/FTPS
>
>
>
> Does not have to be Free.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
Aaron,
I know it's asking allot, but can the 450i be incorporated into your
capacity planner so operators that do have bottlenecks could see what
swapping to a 450i could actually improve over the 450?
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Aaron Schneider <
aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
+1000 on Ruckus. They are tanks. We have a similar setup and use 2
Ruckus R700's back to a ZD3000. It will load balance the AP and each
SSID/Frequency. The max users we've seen between both AP's is 89
users. Handled it without issue.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Three ruc
To view your CDN via netflix/silverlight on PC. Ctrl+Shift+Alt+D I think.
Ctrl+Shift+Alt+M – Menu; includes loading custom .dfxp sub-title files.
Ctrl+Shift+Alt+C – Codes; frame rate plus other (unknown to me) info. Also
makes the other overlays green.
Ctrl+Shift+Alt+D – Display A/V Stats on-scre
When, if ever, will the 450 be capable of 5.2 or 5.1?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> And 5.1 rocks.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Sean Heskett wrote:
>
>
If your switch is running IOS, then "write erase". If you have VLAN's then
"delete flash:vlan.dat"
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Larry Smith wrote:
> On Thu March 26 2015 13:36, Jaime Solorza wrote:
> > How do you resert a Cisco Catalyst 3560=CG to default?
> >
>
> Hmmm, simple answer "clear
Nevermind
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/Status-of-5-1Ghz-for-PMP450/td-p/37344
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
> When, if ever, will the 450 be capable of 5.2 or 5.1?
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Josh Luthman > wrote:
>
&
PPPoE auth is broadcast. This will require a L2 path back to you PPPoE
server (BRAS). This is a deal breaker for many. Overhead is minimal. There
will be a some broadcast chatter on your L2 subnet. This can be filtered a
number of ways and usually not a concern.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:05 AM, T
fference is when folks are using the immediate upstream router for DHCP.
> Depending on hardware, the immediate upstream could be a BRAS as well J
>
>
>
> So not sure why that would be a deal breaker really?
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric
A while back there was a thread about issues running CAT5 cables along the
entire length of solid steel tower legs.
We've run into a problem where we can't run 100baseT reliably on a couple
APs. CRC errors will go away if we force the switch port to 10baseT.
Interestingly enough, packet loss ampli
. The ends are
not corroded at all.
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Colin Stanners wrote:
> You've already checked for grounding issues and nearby 2-way transmitters
> around 100-150mhz?
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Eric Muehleisen > wrote:
>
>> A while back there
he legs and zip tied
> right onto the legs.
>
> Grab shielded cabling and do it again, I bet you have water in the line.
> Double check your connectors at the bottom for corrosion or water.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 W
600SSD's
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Matt wrote:
> > A while back there was a thread about issues running CAT5 cables along
> the
> > entire length of solid steel tower legs.
> >
> > We've run into a problem where we can't run 100baseT reliably on a couple
> > APs. CRC errors will go away i
Would that be blood on the handle?
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 11:44 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
> black tape works just as well
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Jaime Solorza
> wrote:
>
>> We had to use these on project. This is the gun which tightens and cuts
>> them. Careful. Some are very sharp a
We have a PTP650 18 mile link that suddenly dropped 9dbm RSSI. Lots of rain
and a little wind. I have a feeling it's out of alignment or has water in
coax. Is there a stat from the radio that would indicate bad coax jumpers?
Trying to determine what side of the link could be affected.
--
Sent via
We do it like this...
A = 3655
B = 3682
C = 3669
D = 3695
It'll give you at least 1mhz separation between sectors (which is required).
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Paul McCall wrote:
> Can the Cambium 320 radios operate in ABCD fashion (10 Mhz channels using
> covering from 3650 to 3700) w
Yes, but there is an extended range config parameter that overcomes that
limitation.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> at 10 mhz isnt the max distance dramatically limited over 7mhz?
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:53 AM,
We are seeing a similar issue when colocating a UBNT M900 and a Canopy 459i
900mhz. The extra noise created by the M900 makes the band useless, despite
generous channel separation.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> So you think the unit is emitting something just outside of
Subs at 1x or 2x can chew up your frame utilization faster than Netflix can.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Kurt Fankhauser
wrote:
> With the Cambium PMP450 I monitor the framelink utilization via SNMP to
> determine if an AP is oversubscribed or not. I have 25 subs on this ap and
> it peaks
rcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> at 10mhz we get 40 eirp correct?
>
> Anyone using the extended range know how much real world sector capacity
> loss we have? is the aggregate with loss on 10mhz going to be less than the
> throughput at 7mhz?
>
> On Wed, Jul 20,
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
