lumber & 1 stone
I transfer all my liquid assets to D. Margaux
~Corona
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:41 AM D Margaux wrote:
> No idea if I got this all correct. But here goes.
>
> I spend 1 apple to move to (0, 2).
> I spend 1 apple to move to (1, 2).
> I spend 1 apple to move to
Oh, and you'll want to pay upkeep for those building or at least collect
the materials that have piled up in there, as they would otherwise be
destroyed in two days' time.
~Corona
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:55 PM D Margaux wrote:
> Thanks Corona! And nice to meet you :-)
>
Oh, it's fine, nice to meet you too. Also, @H. Arbitor: if I'm still on the
Day Court, please remove me.
~Corona
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:55 PM D Margaux wrote:
> Thanks Corona! And nice to meet you :-)
>
> I feel bad now for blotting you earlier today. Sorry bout that.
> not, in the current or previous month, either won a land auction or
> been the master of a zombie when the zombie won a land auction".
>
> //
>
> I destroy 8 lumber and 4 stones to build a loom at (+5, -1). I transfer
> all my
> cotton to the loom at (+5, -1).
>
> -twg
>
--
~Corona
; > 1. 1 to move from one Land Unit to an adjacent Unit if
> their
> > > > > > Land
> > > > > >Types are the same and the destination is not Aether;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. 2 to move from one Land Unit to an adjacent Unit if
> their
> > > > > > Land
> > > > > >Types differ and the destination is not Aether;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 3. 2 to set the Land Type of a Land Unit which e owns to
> > > > > > either
> > > > > >Black or White.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 4. 3 to set the Land Type of a Land Unit that is
> adjacent to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >Entity's current location, is of type Aether, and is
> owned
> > > > > > by
> > > > > >Agora, to an alternating Land Type.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5. 4 to set the Land Type of a Land Unit that is
> adjacent to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > >Entity's current location, is of type Aether, and is
> owned
> > > > > > by
> > > > > >Agora, to either Black or White.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 6. 6 to set the Land Type of any Land Unit that is of
> type
> > > > > > Aether
> > > > > >and is owned by Agora, to an alternating Land Type.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Trigon
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> > --
> > Trigon
> >
>
>
--
~Corona
> [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
You mean G.A.N. Agora?
~Corona
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit the below argument on the third docket:
>
> Your Honor,
>
>
Possibly INVALID: not referring to Agora properly, though this is an
indirect speech quotation, so it may not count.
> error in the presentation of eir reasons for Agora's eksallance. In
>
This isn't related to this rule in particular, but isn't addressing you
"Your Honor" illegal, given #6: "The Right Honourable
Judge G. SHALL be referred to as such"?
~Corona
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> appears VALID (again,
Me too, if I can find the time I'm going to make the proposal.
~Corona
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, I replied to Discussion right after bidding closed to point them out
> clearly but it was under the very informative Subject Re:[Herald] W
1) and when you make it public I'll have a look to see if I can do 2).
~Corona
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in the _very_ early stages of looking into creating a new MU* for
> Agora. The codebase would
Isn't there a rule such that "arguments SHALL be sorted by docket by the
submitter or as being PROCEDURAL"?
~Corona
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Persons who haven't entered yet still have a few hours!
>
>
> #5 Publius Scrib
[...]
> I want players to enjoy playing the
> game. If elected, I will try to figure out what the players want, and use
> my power as Prime Minister to ensure that their will is carried out.
>
Well, my honorable competitor doesn't really need to be a Prime Minister
to carry out the will of the
2,3 and 4 have already ended, and it's INEFFECTIVE regardless (less than
minimum bid).
~Corona
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I bid:
> -17 Coins in auction 1.
> -17 Coins in auction 2.
> -17 Coins in auction 3.
> -17 Coins in auction 4
NTTPF.
~Corona
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 6:48 PM ATMunn wrote:
>
> > I vote as follows:
> >
> > > 8058* V.J. Rada 1.0 Medal of Honour Auctions V.J. Rada
&g
he one I tried didn't work), I just looted
and bid more often. And creating a monopoly should be handled by a
"lightning rod", see above.
~Corona
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> If we want to "fix" Arcadia, we need to figure out what the underly
What about just resetting the economy (to the same state as when it was
enacted) while implementing Trigon's planned reforms?
~Corona
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> And yeah, not to do with paper, but on the Coins side I'm done
> here.
Leaving the paper framework for a possible repurposing seems like a better
idea to me. Nobody would make paper while it would be useless, so the
economy would not be affected.
~Corona
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> This would be fine but it completely nullifies paper
The majority of people are not in danger of running out of paper, but sure,
I'll support this.
Paper _is_ rather difficult to manufacture, requiring two land units with
facilities (orchard+mill), preferably also a third one (mine) for
sustainability.
~Corona
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 7:57 AM,
I don't know if you're joking or not, but I'd say the land auction, better
auctions thread and cartographor report
~Corona
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:12 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> So it's been a little while since I've checked my email, and now my Agora
> folder looks
I don't think that what constitutes an "active" player is defined in the
rules.
~Corona
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I submit the following Proposal, Land Grants, AI=1:
> ---
Oh right, sorry. I misremembered the rule, thinking only non-Aether land
units counted.
~Corona
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Actually, we're not even close. 30 land units are currently owned by
> entities other than Agora out of 169.
>
> I bid 30 c
Yeah, I already paid.
~Corona
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I resolve the land auctions. Corona wins all of them for 21 coins. Total
> cost is a staggering 105 coins.
>
> I hate my life.
>
> AUCTION 1: the land unit at (-2, -1)
&
By the way, what's the point of the Prime Minister having two votes? If
it's to protect against an invasion, it's terribly ineffective compared to
festivals, as it's not that hard for the invaders to bring one more player
(whether a real person or a sockpuppet) to bear.
~C
> >> > > An advantage of blognomic's systems (channeling CB a lot here) is
> that
> >> > > a new player can rarely win while joining mid-dynasty but is totally
> >> > > level in the next dynasty, usually weeks off. By seeking to remove
> >&g
By the way, you don't need to specify sequential order as (R478):
Actions in messages (including
sub-messages) are performed in the order they appear in the
message, unless otherwise specified.
~Corona
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> I perform
Do you mean when I was Treasuror? I was already fined by G. for that,
you'll need to point out a specific week when I didn't publish a report and
for which I hadn't been fined yet. Also note that I can't be fined for
something that happened more than 14 days ago.
~Corona
On
That is a logical consequence of barring the players who are invested in
the auctions enough to already have purchased a zombie in past auctions.
You know, I think next time I will just get rid of my zombie before the
auction just so that I can purchase a new one and acquire its riches.
~Corona
nvm, zombies can't support
~Corona
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Corona wrote:
> I support that intent, and I act on behalf of 天火狐 to support that intent.
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Rebecca wrote:
>
>> I object to that intent.
>>
land, ever.
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> So I've been planning land purchases, upgrades, and production flow for
> the next month, it's been fun to do. It's a nice little resource
> management/placement game right now.
>
> But each
Sorry, didn't read it thoroughly, nevermind that.
"A facility has a number of Allowed Land Types not equal to 0." - makes it
sound like it's an integer. what about a nonempty set of land types
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:31 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Well, sinc
It did, it's just that nobody discussed it, I guess. Why did you change the
upkeep of the processing facilities to 5 coins flat in the second email?
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I think this email didn't get sent to you guys, so I'm just goi
lol too late, the auction has ended and I won everything
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 4:42 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> I bid 23 coins on 3.
>
> I have no idea where it is, by the way, I just want more land. lol.
>
>
> On 6/28/2018 4:56 PM, Corona wrote:
>
>> NTTPF
>>
Oh no, I forgot it had to make it 4 days before the birthday due to the
notice/intent. I apologize.
~Corona
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I deputize for the Herald to propose the following set of Regulations
> governing the Birthday Tournament for this y
|Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs|
> +-++++---+++++++
> |ATMunn | 6| 32| 1| 0| 7| 0| 64| 14| 0| 12|
> |Aris | 5| 30| 9| 0| 5| 0| 97| 7| 0| 11|
> |Coro
June 24, 2018 8:58 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Did you receive this?
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey m...@timon.red wrote:
> >>
>
via each public forum.'
Clearly, the _receiving_ player is responsible for making sure e can
receive messages, not the sender or the Registrar.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 8:09 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> I CFJ on the following statement:
>
>Before the sending of this message, ATM
Neither have I.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I have not received it.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:28 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> >
This was delivered to me from all three lists. Does Official work again?
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> Test
>
> --
> From V.J. Rada
>
e only way for their conditional vote to resolve as FOR all
proposals is for my conditional vote to resolve as FOR all proposals (if I
voted differently, their conditional vote would be indeterminate and
default to PRESENT).
~Corona
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Sat, 20
Getting into fractional reserve territory here, right?
~Corona
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 1:16 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> I bid 20 coins on each auction.
>
>
> On 6/22/2018 5:10 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
>> I bid 17 coins on auction 1.
>>
>> On 6/22/2018 2:59 PM, Coron
I want a hyperbolic world!
~Corona
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:58 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> I've noticed that I haven't made a proposal in a long time, so I decided
> to start working on one, and it's going to be a big one this time. Draft
> being worked on right now.
>
That's right. Sorry OscarMeyr, I was very tired when I wrote it.
~Corona
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:12 AM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> that cfj decided that the sillyness of an action is an inextricable
> conditional.
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Benjamin Schultz
> wr
False, what made you think that? Players are dissatisfied if reports are
missed; oh yes, persons missing reports will be punished with atom-clock
precision and a camel's perseverance. (and an impeachment will be attempted
if the person fails to respond for long enough)
~Corona
On Mon, J
the sum of satisfaction of the players, both
at the moment and in the future.
~Corona
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Are any referee candidates willing to share their planned blotting
> policies?
>
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> >
Great! But (2,2) is mine.
~Corona
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I was wrong about not pushing the new version. I did indeed push the
> changes, but I didn't update the link in the report. This is the real link:
>
> https://agoranomic.org/Cartograph
the incense, not the generic removing of
destructible assets at will in the Assets rule.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> The Police Blo
>
> > Corona, note that PSS was awarded a Welcome Package by Proposal 8051.
>
Noted,
> > As required by the new Rule Zombie Life Cycle:
> > - I announce my intent to flip Quazie's master switch to Agora,
> >with Notice. (Corona owns 2+ zombies). C
Me too
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Received
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>
> On June 15, 2018 9:00 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > If I have not previous resolved decisions to
I'm in the same situation.
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 1:48 PM Kerim Aydin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > >
>
>
> This new segment will be my place to make minor comments and/or
> announcements. For example, I want to note that I added new features to
> the interactive map as Corona mentioned I should.
>
I don't see anything new on the interactive map?
T.T I couldn't have acted on that intent any earlier than next Tuesday, and
the dynasty will definitely be over by then.
~Corona
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I object to Corona’s attempt, because the dynasty isn’t over just yet (will
> be soon though).
>
Nvm, it doesn't need to.
~Corona
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Corona
wrote:
> AI needs to be 3.1
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Aris Merchant gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Title: Anonymity Patch
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>> Author:
AI needs to be 3.1
~Corona
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Title: Anonymity Patch
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: Aris
> Co-authors: G.
>
> Amend Rule 478, "Fora", by appending
>
> "In
Why did we abolish actual monetary fines again? The way it's now, either
you have the incense (and suffer no ill effects whatsoever), or you don't
(and you cannot win the game for a month or more).
~Corona
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-14 a
ss, I think it's singular vocative
~Corona
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 2:51 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> Ah, ok.
>
>
> On 6/12/2018 7:46 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
>
>> Ancient Greek, not modern Greek. It's from the start of the Iliad. [1] In
>> fact, it's the first word
ot; (or it could be a bonus to isolated facilities, same thing)
-making the (immune to transfiguration) central square completely gray, so
that it doesn't support/encourage the 2 large groups
~Corona
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Excuse me, but have you seen how
It's off-topic, but it just occurred to me that it'd be nice if you
(Trigon) could, in the interactive Cartographor report, make some little
ownership flags or w/e display over the land units - clicking on them one
by one to find out who owns what is a little awkward.
~Corona
On T
Well, what would you think about reviving my suggestion to incentivize
"capturing" land units with a healthy financial reward?
~Corona
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> In compliance with rule 2004, I run land auctions (almost) every Agoran
> Week. Howe
I support this too.
~Corona
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 5:04 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> I like this idea and will use it if it gets enacted. +1
>
>
> On 6/12/2018 2:42 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Proto: Trades.
>>
>> [this might be a type o
ating
> type.
> > > > >
> > > > > I transfer the mine on that unit's resources to myself.
> > > >
> > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this fails, because (-2, -1)
> > > >
> > > > doesn't have a mine on it, and wasn't where you were standing
> anyway. I
> > > >
> > > > think you meant to reference the mine at (-1, -1), but I can't come
> up with
> > > >
> > > > a parsing where "that unit" refers to anything other than (-2, -1).
> > > >
> > > > -twg
> >
> > --
> >
> > From V.J. Rada
>
>
>
--
~Corona
Can you actually do that? I can't find anything that would allow
withdrawing nominations.
~Corona
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> > I become a candidate for Referee
>
> I withdraw my nomination for Referee. -G.
>
>
>
>
2 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> y'know, that was a silly reaction. I give 2 incense to Corona.
>
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I Object to the intent.
> >
> > I Levy a fine of 2 Blots on Corona (Summary Judgement) for this
> > abuse of o
days have passed since assets were created in the
facility most recently, e must not have taken any assets from
the inventory of another facility located on a preserved Land
Unit within this Agoran week.
~Corona
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:14 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
Ah, nevermind then.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> No, the whole thing just fails I'm afraid (Rule 2529/3):
>In the second Eastman week of an Agoran month, if there are any
>players who are eligible for a Medal of Honour
Oh yeah, I thought so, I just couldn't find the relevant paragraph. Well,
now I have to wait 7 days to resolve, I guess.
~Corona
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 22:26 +0200, Corona wrote:
> > I initiate an Agoran Decision on who is t
But it would self-ratify before the new report would and I was afraid
somebody would notice and I'd lose the Land Unit again...
~Corona
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Oh, come on. I was going to put out this week's report today. >:(
>
> On W
Oh I see, sorry.
~Corona
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> If you've paid, then you should havethe land unit already.
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018, 13:26 Corona wrote:
>
> > Nvm, I want 2. (By the way, Trigon, are you going to resolve that last
> &g
es to that.
~Corona
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Ok, I'll lay it out.
>
> 1. I'm after the currencies not the votes.
>
> 2. I plan to work with Aris to propose some version of the zombie nerf
> this
> week, that would limit
Oh ok, will fix
~Corona
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> CoE: Still off I'm afraid. Zombies should get the May salary (that
> includes
> 3 Incs) but not the initial 5. (then some people transferred the Incs from
> their zombies to themselve
G., stop trying to usurp dictatorship of Agora! ;) Or perhaps we could come
to an agreement - you get one, I get one, as we have the most coins.
I bid 11 coins in the zombie auction.
~Corona
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I bid 10 coins in the zombie auction
round & creating the
land units, and transfiguration occurs once per month - facilities are
infinitely more convenient than that.
The middle square IMO really ruins the Go aspect by anchoring those two
super-stable groups.
~Corona
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
e relevant to players is that it's annoying to have to pay 2 apples
when changing terrain types? That doesn't seem very Go-like to me...
Well, thanks for reviewing the proposal!
~Corona
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2018, Corona wrote:
>
&
stman week of each Agoran
Month.
This rule seems to plainly state that you CAN perform the actions at any
point in the second or third week, and SHALL do so at some point in the
second week, nothing more.
~Corona
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Comments inline
&g
On second thought, I'll change the reward to 3 coins, 3 apples/Land Unit,
as you can expend a lot of apples trying to capture even a single Land
Unit. Or maybe give a bonus for facilities destroyed (40% of total cost)?
~Corona
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Corona wrote:
> Well, nobo
I think it looks okay; the border between aether and non-aether is a bit
subtle, but it works.
~Corona
On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions! Here's what I came up with. I decided on the
> colon (:) character for non-aether land units
uot;build order": mine+orchard->refinery->farm+loom->temple+mill)
~Corona
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:26 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> Speaking of nichdel, however, it seems I get some more free stuff from em.
>
> I act on behalf of nichdel to transfer all eir assets to me.
>
> [A
| 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10|
0| 5| *
*|Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5|
0| 5| *
*|Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16|
0| 5| *
*|CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8
|Fabr|
*+---++++---++++++
|*ATMunn | 5| 15| 0| 0| 5| 0| 20| 3| 0|
*|*Aris | 5| 20| 4| 0| 5| 0| 50| 7| 0|
*|*Corona | 11| 14| 2| 4| 5| 0| 45| 6| 0|
*|*Cuddl
| 10| 0| 39| 10|
0| 5|
|Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5|
0| 5|
|Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16|
0| 5|
|CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8|
0| 5|
|G
(Or you can vote for entering the judgement into moot if you want)
~Corona
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Corona wrote:
> Sorry, G. judged that paying without recipient doesn't mean transferring
> to anyone but it means destruction (see below), so you didn't pay (you
> w
; > currency is created or destroyed as needed.
> so if "payment without destination" is a method in the rules for doing
> something, it happens via asset destruction only (not transfer).
>
~Corona
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Where
|Incs|
+---++++---+++++++
|ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10|
0| 5|
|Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5|
0| 5|
|Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16|
0| 5|
|Cuddl
I'm working on a report which will be ready tomorrow or the day after.
Y'all can feel free to post one earlier (or later) though, especially as
it's kind of a mess and I'm not 100% sure I'll have it right.
~Corona
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:23 AM, Aris Merchant <
though
(how do I always manage to press tab & enter to send a message prematurely?)
It should *be* mostly irrelevant though, I made sure *to* construct &
upgrade the buildings (to a lower level, however) even for the case the
scam didn't work.
~Corona
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:18 PM,
I believe this auction has ended, and Quazie's bid was withdrawn due to em
not having sufficient funds.
~Corona
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Corona wrote:
> I bid 4 and I act on behalf of Quazie to bid 9 in the ongoing land auction.
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 25, 2018, ATMu
*emself; e, sorry.
~Corona
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Corona wrote:
> Doesn't G. have 5 votes by himself? He is PM and has 3 zombies.
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Ned Strange
> wrote:
>
>> I think G and I with our 6 votes between us ca
Doesn't G. have 5 votes by himself? He is PM and has 3 zombies.
~Corona
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> I think G and I with our 6 votes between us can block anything, or at
> least anything with more than 1 AI. Funny.
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:45
Consent - Rule 2519, maybe?
Is that so? I can just destroy the assets myself tomorrow, I'm about to
hit the hay now.
~Corona
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
> > I give consent to Quazie to transfer... a
This is easily abused by flipping its ownership switch between you and
contract/zombie.
Couldn't an actual economic victory condition encourage building etc.?
~Corona
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I want to get land circulating and used. Therefore, I su
also in the
"
doesn't THIS apply to "pay" without a destination?
"
thread
~Corona
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Ned Strange
wrote:
>
> I call a CFJ with the statement "To "pay" assets is to transfer them to
anyone"
>
> many
I (unconditionally) looted the mine (1,1) an hour earlier, sorry.
~Corona
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Actually, I think those last actions failed due to undefined terms.
>
> I destroy a corn to travel from to (0, -1), and then to (0, 0), and then
> t
to anyone" interpretation,
since a "pretty strong implication" (see the "doesn't THIS apply to "pay"
without a destination?" thread) is not enough to warrant the other
interpretation.
~Corona
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I
Nothing in particular is specified in the rule, in practice it's for
scamming/passing a proposal to that effect.
~Corona
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> Alright. Am I eligible for one of those by the way? I forget what thing
> let people get them.
>
> On 4
Hmm, does this mean you can arbitrarily destroy indestructible assets by
attempting to transfer them to nobody in particular?
~Corona
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
>
>
> Ok I looked up competent authority and see how it works in this
> context. Back to
anything about rules needing to
"explicitly describe" methods?
If the CFJ is going to be called, I'd like it to be judged till the end of
the week if possible. It's frustrating having buildings or other assets in
an uncertain gamestate.
~Corona
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:28 P
, the Cartographor SHOULD
issue a humiliating public reminder to all those who have not paid
upkeep fees on any of eir facilities."
~Corona
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:00 AM K
could have been done (sorta)
> > with contracts too, right?
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > > It's clear that zombies are way to powerful and need to be weakened
> > > substantially. Proposed restrictions:
> > >
> > > - 1 zombie per player max
> > > - Zombies can be deregistered by announcement after a month as zombies
> > >
> > > -Aris
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
~Corona
So I can pay the assets to Quazie (or myself, though that would be more
legally contestable)? Awesome!
~Corona
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Corona wrote:
>
> I was about to build something, but then I noticed:
>>
>>A pl
ing? Is it actually possible to
upgrade facilities, or is it ill defined and thus broken?
~Corona
ed Rank 1 Orchard, owned by Agora
>>> (+1, -1): Preserved Rank 1 Farm, owned by Agora
>>> (+1, +1): Preserved Rank 1 Mine, owned by Agora
>>> ( 0, -2): Rank 2 Farm, owned by Trigon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LOCATIONS OF ENTITIES
>>>
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
