On 09/02/2010 08:05 PM, Warrigal wrote:
For that matter, what does Agora as a whole think, since FSCN
currently has no special power at all?
—Co-Founder Tanner L. Swett
My response was posted to #really-a-cow.
-coppro
On 09/01/2010 04:36 PM, ais523 wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 16:29 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
This announcement opens the voting period on the decision to adopt the
winning Website Submission. The Sysadmin is the vote collector; the
voting period is one week. Every active player and Taral
On 08/29/2010 12:07 PM, Sgeo wrote:
I don't think I have the willpower to be Chroniclor... I resign from
Chroniclor
You're not allowed to do that.
-coppro
On 08/29/2010 04:26 PM, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 00:24 +0200, Keba wrote:
TTttPP
Is this a synonym for TTttPF? If so (or if not), what does it stand for?
It's a secret agreement between em and the Distributor that it means NttPF.
-coppro
On 08/29/2010 06:52 PM, com...@gmail.com wrote:
AGAINST unless it's labour
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 29, 2010, at 8:28 PM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
Labour still means work, not worker. May I suggest Undergrad
or Intern?
—Tanner L. Swett
How about Labor?
-coppro
On 08/27/2010 02:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 26 August 2010 23:22, Kebaag...@kebay.org wrote:
I submit a Proposal Journey fix (AI=1, II=1, distributable via fee)
I'd personally prefer a fix that made the first wormhole explicitly a
Shuttle
On 08/27/2010 06:05 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2844
=== CFJ 2844 (Interest Index = 0)
I have CFJed on this exact statement, except with 'United' and
'City' exchanged.
On 08/27/2010 02:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
And, from the rulest of 5 years ago today:
Proposal: Church and State (AI=1, II=0)
{{{
Enact a new rule entitled Church and State reading
A cardinal is an active, ready player who is neither the current
Speaker nor the Associate
On 08/26/2010 04:08 PM, Keba wrote:
Well, what's about a scam like I change my name to Crown Prince (or
any other Courtier)? I don't know whether the voting limits are
increased by re-naming, but at least the special duties and powers
should apply, if coppro's (or the Robot's?) scam worked.
On 08/26/2010 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following 3-line public document, TheRobot.
10 PRINT I AM THE ROBOT. I DO THE ROBOT DANCE.
20 REM G. MAY MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT BY ANNOUNCEMENT
30 GOTO 10
I submit that this is the first entity within Agora that fits any
reasonable extent
On 08/26/2010 05:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 08/26/2010 11:11 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I submit the following 3-line public document, TheRobot.
10 PRINT I AM THE ROBOT. I DO THE ROBOT DANCE.
20 REM G. MAY MODIFY THIS DOCUMENT BY ANNOUNCEMENT
30 GOTO 10
On 08/25/2010 01:30 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Tue, 24/8/10, omdc.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case, the entity with the name The Robot will be
coppro *at the time of the enaction of the rule*. Also:
A document referring to an entity by name refers to the
entity that had that name when
On 08/25/2010 01:55 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Wed, 25/8/10, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I contest this NoV. I initiate a criminal CFJ regarding this NoV and
submit it to the Justiciar.
Who is the Justiciar, anyway? And is this the first time that power's been
used, since
On 08/24/2010 12:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Well, that's slightly more interesting, but the Proposal was a document
that predated coppro's name change, so there's a case to be made that
the Proposal's referent transfers to the Rules along with the actual
language. -G.
The language clearly says
On 08/24/2010 05:28 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
When Distributed Proposal 6808 is resolved and ADOPTED,
s/When/If/
It's 22-20 and the voting period is over.
-The Robot
On 08/24/2010 07:53 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Any of these that worked the first time fail here.
This distribution of proposals 6811-6821
initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible
voters are the active players at the time of this distribution, and
the vote collector
arrr
-coppro
I hope things are working now
sorry for spamming.
-coppro
On 08/23/2010 02:31 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
sorry for spamming.
-coppro
yep. I ain't done yet :( getting this to work is annoyinger than I thought.
-coppro
On 08/23/2010 02:35 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 08/23/2010 02:31 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
sorry for spamming.
-coppro
yep. I ain't done yet :( getting this to work is annoyinger than I thought.
-coppro
Okay, last go for now. I promise this will end, whether it works or not.
Hopefully using
On 08/23/2010 12:38 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Mon, 23/8/10, Sean Huntscsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I hope things are working now
I conclude on general principles that you're planning a timing scam, and am
wondering what it is.
I was testing email filters, actually. It's the first
On 08/23/2010 05:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, ag...@kebay.org wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:11:32 -0700 (PDT), Kerim Aydin
ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
This violates R101(vii). The only way I can think to get around it (it
has
come up before for other non-natural
-coppro
On 08/21/2010 02:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6808 P 1 1.0 coppro Super Robot Powers
AGAINST (I smell a scam consisting of an affordably short sub-message
within a 1000+ word container message)
I sure hope not; that's why I built the Robot rule and the recent
proposed amendment of
On 08/20/2010 02:01 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
Proposal: Barrel of Monkeys (AI = 1, II = 2)
Create a new power-1 rule entitled Barrel of Monkeys with the
following text:
The zookeepor is an office. Barrels are a currency, tracked by the
zookeepor. Monkeys are a currency, tracked by the zookeepor.
On 08/20/2010 04:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Alex Smith wrote:
--- On Fri, 20/8/10, Aaron Goldfeinaarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal: Barrel of Monkeys (AI = 1, II = 2)
Ugh, is Agora turning into BlogNomic?
Yeah, I'm disappointed people here think clever in
On 08/19/2010 04:06 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Uh, yeah, the shuttle is in a wormhole right now. It has been warped
and disappeared, but I think that was deemed to mean destroyed. So,
yeah, wooble probably just won. We have omd to thank for firing the
laser cannon whose recoil caused the shuttle
On 08/19/2010 04:58 PM, Keba wrote:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Uh, yeah, the shuttle is in a wormhole right now. It has been warped
and disappeared, but I think that was deemed to mean destroyed. So,
yeah, wooble probably just won. We have omd to thank for firing the
laser cannon whose recoil
On 08/17/2010 09:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
6800 P 1 1.5 coppro Distribution
Endorse Taral
While I support this vote generally, Taral is not an eligible voter and
so the vote will be PRESENT.
-coppro
On 08/17/2010 02:24 PM, ais523 wrote:
6794 P 0 1.0 coppro Restore White
Conditional: AGAINST if proposal 6794 passes/would pass, FOR otherwise
Uh...
If you meant 6795, it should be totally ineffective if 6795 does pass,
as White Ribbons won't be defined and will cease to
On 08/17/2010 05:59 PM, omd wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: comexcom...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:13 PM
Subject: Bridge
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
I push the Heavy Laser Cannon button harder.
Note: Per the headers, this message left omd's domain of
On 08/15/2010 10:46 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 13:31, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/15/2010 11:20 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw this proposal.
Proposal: Super Robot Powers (AI=1, II=1, coauthor)
{{{
Enact a new Rule reading
The Robot can, by announcement
On 08/16/2010 02:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, omd wrote:
So, what sort of disclaimers work?
Looking through all this, I think disclaimers should have no direct legal
effect other than to alert people that something might be wrong. Then, if
a truthiness case is brought, an
On 08/16/2010 04:28 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
3. Moved the office-tracking to the granulator (associated with
Leadership, I suppose, and I'm willing to get it started).
I think this belongs to the Herald and, honestly, Herald is currently in
On 08/16/2010 05:06 PM, Keba wrote:
Kerim Aydin wrote:
Proto: Reinventing The List v0.2 (AI-2)
AI should be 2.1 because of Create the following Rule, Leader
Bootstrap, power-2.1:, shouldn’t it?
I like most of the idea, but I don’t want DICE rolls here. The Rebbel
system should work
On 08/16/2010 05:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
waitwhat? This does nicely solve the rapid Court manipulation problem, I
think. I would give you a prop for this idea, but I'd end up taking it
from you for suggesting the current system, so it's a wash.
Hey
On 08/16/2010 05:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
[When multiple players win, they can cycle through speakership at
7-day intervals with order of winning not mattering]
7 or 14? I like that there may be a ratrace to crown other people so as to get
On 08/16/2010 11:05 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
Nah, Chamber doesn't work that well anyways.
What about that change that ehird suggested, where you got 5 votes
on some chamber other than your own?
I'm a fan. I suppose we could leave it in with this proposal - though it
would mean
It has come to my attention that, during a period in 2007, the title
First Speaker, borne by Michael, was dropped from the Herald's report.
Can anyone confirm if this was or was not, in fact, a Patent Title?
-coppro
On 08/12/2010 10:56 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 20:49, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com
mailto:ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Players MUST NOT make proposals submitted in accordance with this
rule Undistributable.
Why not? If someone wants to pay the 2 ergs
On 08/13/2010 02:08 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Keba wrote:
Hereby, I publish a Notice of Violation alleging that Murphy violated
Rule 2143, which has power 1, by failing to publish an Air Traffic
Controller's report in the week starting on 5th July 2010.
[It's not the point that they were no weekly
On 08/13/2010 05:21 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Because they are supposed to be an automatic part of the game. In
particular, the only reason someone would make an II=0 proposal
undistributable is to delay it a week, which
On 08/13/2010 01:49 PM, comex wrote:
I transfer all my assets to the bank and then deregister. There's
some precedents here, but unfortunately, those precedents were for when
assets were more strictly controlled and the rules came out and said you
had to be very specific. That's not in the
On 08/12/2010 11:36 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I create a Black ribbon in my possession.
--Wooble
Fails; I think you meant Blue.
-coppro
On 08/12/2010 12:31 PM, comex wrote:
Note: Some of these actions may fail.
Murphy gets a Green Ribbon.
Wooble gets a Blue Ribbon.
I get a Yellow Ribbon.
-coppro
On 08/12/2010 12:51 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 08/12/2010 12:31 PM, comex wrote:
Note: Some of these actions may fail.
Murphy gets a Green Ribbon.
Wooble gets a Blue Ribbon.
I get a Yellow Ribbon.
-coppro
Oh, comex also gets a Silver Ribbon.
-coppro
On 08/11/2010 10:37 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I submit a fragment:
While a player is Over a Barrel, e CANNOT
INEFFECTIVE; the timeout hadn't been met and no one had submitted one
after your first one of that message.
-coppro
On 08/11/2010 01:18 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 14:10, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
mailto:aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:57, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
mailto:geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I create 2
On 08/10/2010 04:05 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:00 -0500, agora-business-ad...@agoranomic.org
wrote:
Your mail to 'agora-business' with the subject
BUS: A History of Agoran Wins, 2009-Present
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The
On 08/09/2010 10:39 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
H. Distributor Taral, would you care to
On 08/07/2010 01:06 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Is this setting up for the return of power of attorney, and if so, why
not go ahead and propose (or at least proto) that too?
Yes, but I haven't added it in because there's no strong framework for
it right now.
-coppro
On 08/06/2010 04:30 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
I submit the following proposal (AI 2, II 1, coauthor=ehird, title=To
make chambers interesting, not yet distributable):
Create a new power-2 rule VLOD Bootstrapping:
{{{
A player's voting limit on an unresolved Ordinary decision that existed
before
On 08/02/2010 07:22 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
*6760 OP1 1.0 coppro Push From the Inside
*6761 OP1 2.0 coppro I Postulate an Assumption
*6762 OP0 1.0 Yally Clean Up Space
Also, to prevent
On 08/02/2010 07:20 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
*6759 OP1 1.0 coppro Ill-conceived
Rule 1698 may make this change not occur; we now have all decisions
Ordinary by default, with no defined voting limits on ordinary
On 08/02/2010 01:04 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
6779 P 1 1.0 coppro A Team Player
AGAINST [Will players who own the old (contestmaster) yellow ribbon
own this ribbon?]
No; Yellow Ribbons do not exist currently.
-coppro
On 08/02/2010 04:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
6779 P 1 1.0 coppro A Team Player
FPR
As opposed to AGAINT?
-coppro
On 07/31/2010 11:56 AM, comex wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
c) It causes at least one Winning Condition to be satisfied, as
defined by other rules.
For it to be a win announcement it must cause a Winning Condition to
be
On 07/29/2010 02:42 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, I'm suddenly unconvinced that Win Announcements work at all for
most defined win conditions.
A win announcement must be factually correct in announcing that
someone wins the game (R2186).
But most win conditions are not triggered until a win
On 07/24/2010 09:10 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
I change all sitting players to standing.
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2818
=== CFJ 2818 (Interest Index = 0)
Yally is a candidate for Ship Computor.
On 07/25/2010 04:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Proto: Reinventing The List (AI-2)
Create the following rule, The List of Succession, Power=2:
The List of Succession is an ordered list of all current
players except the current Speaker. The first (1st) position
is the
On 07/23/2010 01:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
6761 P None 2.0 coppro I Postulate an Assumption
AGAINST [just make it flip to Assumed when a player assumes an office, I say]
Your proposed fix a) breaks the MWoP and b) doesn't solve the problem
that when an officer goes on hold, the
On 07/26/2010 01:13 PM, comex wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydinke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
6765 P 1 3.0 comex Adoption Without Objection
AGAINST (Whether or not I like the idea in general - I haven't
decided - it doesn't give consideration to
On 07/23/2010 01:24 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
6761 P None 2.0 coppro I Postulate an Assumption
AGAINST [just make it flip to Assumed when a player assumes an office, I say]
what
On 07/15/2010 04:46 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I CFJ on the following sentence, II=1. A Captain, as defined by Rule
2287, has no fewer than 11 ergs created in eir possession at the start
of each week.
Evidence: Rule 2283
(c) For each player, that player is awarded 6 ergs if e is the
On 07/07/2010 10:19 AM, comex wrote:
That one could go either way, I think; I won't object to you Cleaning
it.
No, it couldn't.
Yes, it could. is can refer to the gamestate as a whole.
-coppro
On 07/01/2010 09:10 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
[Yally's favoring can't be honored at this time because e is
sitting, not standing.]
I thought e was leaning?
-coppro
On 07/01/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2805
=== CFJ 2805 (Interest Index = 0)
Tiger created a Fragment in the above-quoted message.
On 06/30/2010 03:27 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Happy 17th birthday, Agora!
I award myself a Magenta ribbon.
Ineffective; it was July 1 in New Zealand at the time.
-coppro
On 06/30/2010 09:51 PM, comex wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Aaron Goldfein
aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 16:27, Ed Murphyemurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Happy 17th birthday, Agora!
I wonder if Agora is older than any of its players.
ehird, apparently.
On 06/21/2010 04:25 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
[This file lists the contents of the proposal pool.
File generated at 2010-06-21T22:24:19Z. Not necessarily up to date as
of then; recent changes may be missing.
NOT A SOURCE FILE: automatically generated, do not edit.
okay
On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
Murphy E Wooble = Wooble
Wooble = Wooble
Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
CoE: Either it failed quorum or the voting period was doubled.
On 06/15/2010 12:16 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I thought about not appealing and doing a legislative clarification, but
codifying basic communications/ common administrative conveniences while
keeping them sufficiently flexible is nigh-impossible, versus maintaining
sensible precedents. -G.
I
On 06/13/2010 04:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
So if the fragment is all the text, including the delimiters, would
just the middle line constitute substantially the same text as
required for the D-proposal to work?
That's a SHOULD meant to be evaluated by the people, but I'd take no
issue
On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
Murphy E Wooble = Wooble
Wooble = Wooble
Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
CoE: Either it failed quorum or the voting period was doubled.
On 06/06/2010 01:55 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the
holder of the office of Registrar. For this Decision, the
eligible voters are all the active first-class players, each with a
voting limit of one. The Intergalactic
On 06/06/2010 10:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
* I think it's too late for admitting the CoE to nullify the
entire decision.
Notice of Violation: coppro violated Rule 2201 (b) by failure to
respond to a CoE asap after the expressed doubt. -G.
I contest this as distribution is not
On 06/01/2010 04:31 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 2 June 2010 00:14, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
List of Succession (no particular order):
You're right. I haven't been able to follow any particular order in
this list for a long time now. Could we please bring back that system
we had
On 06/01/2010 05:01 PM, comex wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
The Speaker is now woggle! All hail Speaker woggle!
I hail Speaker woggle.
I intend, without objection, to make
On 05/29/2010 02:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 May 2010 14:34, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I come off
On 05/24/2010 11:54 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
CoE: When Wooble voted for these proposals other than 6724, e had two
Rests and was Red, and the decisions were Purple. Therefore e had a
voting limit of 0. Since e did not specify a number of ballots to cast,
per Rule 2280, e cast 0 votes. Therefore
On 05/25/2010 01:21 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Finally, by common definition, being worthy of being a figurehead (a
head or chief in name only) is exactly what Andon is.
TRUE.
-G.
I wish I hadn't used up my prop transfer for the week.
-coppro
On 05/24/2010 11:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
8. Murphy (15 May 2010 08:29:52 -0700)
Mornington Crescent
CoE: I submitted another fragment yesterday in a message with the
subject 'More'
-coppro
On 05/23/2010 01:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
This distribution of proposals and the subsequent assigning of ID
numbers initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt proposals
6728-6730. The eligible voters for these proposals are the active
players as of this message; their voting limits
On 05/23/2010 04:37 PM, comex wrote:
I spend a fee to initiate an election for Registrar.
Fails; there is already an ongoing election.
-coppro
On 05/21/2010 12:05 PM, ais523 wrote:
I vote AGAINST each of those proposals. Wooble pointed out on IRC that
they stop non-senators voting.
This is by design; it's intended to be a new form of defense against
dictatorship scams, since it also makes the proposal 'democratic' (not
actually
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Alex Smith
callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/5/10, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
coppro wrote:
I sit up.
ITYM I stand up.
Last I checked, players couldn't stand by announcement;
has that changed? (However, given that we're
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:26 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
=== CFJ 2797 (Interest Index = 0)
If the proposal entitled Reassign the name passed, it would
successfully null
On 05/09/2010 10:28 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that, depending on the eventual judgement on
CFJ 2793, there are no judges well-qualified to be assigned to CFJ 2793,
as the only standing players are
ais523 (Justiciar)
comex (Chief Whip)
coppro (disqualified)
On 05/08/2010 08:41 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I retract this proposal.
Proposal: weird (AI=1, II=2, Distributable via fee)
{{{
Enact a new power-2 Rule entitled The Play-o-Matic with the follwing
text:
The Machine is a second-class person and a player. Its basis
is the set of all players.
Any
Can someone who is unambiguously a Senator (woggle, perhaps) please
end this Emergency Session if it is in progress, to reduce ambiguity?
Thanks
On 05/05/2010 05:18 PM, comex wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone who is unambiguously a Senator (woggle, perhaps) please
end this Emergency Session if it is in progress, to reduce ambiguity?
Thanks
I intend, with two Senate support, to call
On 05/04/2010 07:35 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
Voting results for Proposals 6713 - 6720:
H. Assessor, do you intend to resolve the Decisions for Proposals 6708-6712?
-coppro
On 05/04/2010 01:36 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
On 05/04/2010 07:35 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6713 OG0 3.0 Murphy Eliminate past repetitive wins
PRESENT
According to my records, you still have 2 rests from April 25,
so your voting limit is 0.
I only gave myself one.
On 05/03/2010 07:53 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
On 05/02/2010 06:43 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
If I'm not a player, I register and sit up.
This will fail in any case; there is currently an Emergency Session
Since when?
so your posture must be supine.
Since I started a coup last
On 05/03/2010 08:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I started a coup last week.
Care to provide a message-ID?
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2010-April/025537.html
-coppro
On 05/03/2010 04:30 PM, comex wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
Care to provide a message-ID?
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2010-April/025537.html
I'm still curious: what were you announcing about the Palace's
On 05/02/2010 03:12 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
On 26 April 2010 07:10, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
This distribution of proposals and the subsequent assigning of ID
numbers initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt proposals
6713-6720. The eligible voters for these proposals are
On 05/02/2010 06:43 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
If I'm not a player, I register and sit up.
This will fail in any case; there is currently an Emergency Session so
your posture must be supine.
-coppro
testing...
601 - 700 of 1518 matches
Mail list logo
