Re: PDML UK 2024

Doug Brewer wrote: >Keep in mind that felonies are out of my range. I assume that means financially, not morally. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the direct

Undeliverable: Where yourself nature outside little cell north. STP-7

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: ninje...@aol.com The email system had a problem processing this message. It won't try to deliver this message again. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: exchange2019.ionos.com ninje...@

[ceph-users] #1359 (update) Ceph filesystem failure | Ceph filesystem probleem

aanlopen, dus afwachten en duimen. Als we de data uit CephFS hebben gekopieerd op tijdelijke storage, kunnen we verdere oplossingen voor de toekomst verzinnen en implementeren. NB: neem contact op met postmaster (mailto:postmas...@science.ru.nl) als je een urgent verzoek hebt voor een *kleine

Re: Got myself a new lens

Henk Terhell wrote: >I have the PLM type of 55-300 which is always attached to my K-70. >However the PLM lens is not compatible with a K-5 II. My bad. Typo. My new camera is a K-3ii, not K-5. Works a treat with the new PLM lens. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: [mailop] Is forwarding to Gmail basically dead?

ring warnings with a critical eye, and I find it hard to blame users for this because they just want/need to be productive without having to decipher warnings filled with computer-industry jargon and require a lot of extra work on their part to parse-and-understand. -- Postmaster - postmas...@

Re: [mailop] Is forwarding to Gmail basically dead?

it to us in the first place. Mail server misconfiguration has been a problem since the dawn of the time of SMTP authentication. Are there any particular DKIM/ARC mangles you've seen that come to mind for you that are particularly noteable? =D -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter

Re: [mailop] Is forwarding to Gmail basically dead?

t check their spam folders and complain they > didn't receive certain messages. > > My opinion: Get rid of forwarding to external sites whenever possible. Some universities don't even provide a forwarding option for the eMail accounts they set up for their students, an

Re: [mailop] problem setting up open-dmarc

my intention is to contribute code updates to support using PostgreSQL for the back-end reporting database. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc. Vancouver, B

Re: [mailop] problem setting up open-dmarc

ir senders of the deadlines). I greatly value the SPF/DKIM/DMARC mechanisms because it means my clients don't get forgeries that look like they came from their co-workers. (In a few cases, some of those forgeries included attachments of old documents dated from times of past securi

Re: [mailop] problem setting up open-dmarc

have the milter configuration aspect covered in sendmail? > Thanks a lot, I am using sendmail as my mta. > > On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:39:41 -0500, > Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop wrote: > > > > Which mail server software and OS are you using? Are you recei

Re: [mailop] problem setting up open-dmarc

.covici.com > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inte

Re: [mailop] It's almost getting funny out there now..

s at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic > A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca > "LinuxMagic" a Reg. TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd. > > 604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada > ___

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus SBL listing fonts.googleapis.com

s, it's difficult to say, but since both the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses mentioned are owned by Google (according to WHOIS queries), I think it's reasonable to assume that, for their main domain names, Google doesn't intend to send eMail from the IPv4 address and may have included

Re: [mailop] Support contact for Shaw.ca

rward-software.com > > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer &

Re: [mailop] Hotmail blocks mail to postmaster in violation of 5321/2821/821

t; [ RFC 5321 ss. 4.5.1 and 6.3, to wit. ] > > If you are, or know, a postmaster at hotmail.com/outlook.com, > please take my white gloves and smack yourself/them across the face. > > Then tell them their error messages don't contain the codes listed > in their error table

Re: [mailop] Microsoft Outbound Spam Seemingly Has Morphed

FILTER > smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024; from= > to= proto=ESMTP > helo= We're seeing these since 2024-Feb-04. It looks like spam to us too. > We have banned the Bing subdomain above. > > Hope that helps. Yes, thank you. We just added them to our block-and-for

Re: [clamav-users] clamav now has a tempfail?

thanks On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 09:43:27AM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas (uh...@fantomas.sk) wrote: > On 23.11.23 15:06, Postmaster via clamav-users wrote: > > Running ClamAV 1.0.1/27101 on AlmaLinux release 8.8 with sendmail > > 8.15.2-34.el8 > > I have extra milters:

[clamav-users] Save a copy of the mail (quarantine=quarantined by clamav-milter)

Hi Setup ~ os: AlmaLinux release 8.9 sendmail: 8.15.2-34.el8 mimedefang: version 3.4.1 clamd: 1.0.1/27173 Problem: I have a few problems with emails sent by a couple of legimate senders, they are quarantined. I would like to save copies of the emails sent, but I cannot find out h

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL]Re: Spamfolder mini rant (Was: Contact Google Postmaster) --> "Junk (suspected)" as preferred folder nam

the years that this particular folder name has actually been a helpful yet subtle reminder to not completely ignore the Junk eMail folder. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.

Re: [mailop] Italian provider TIM.it (alie.it) contact postmaster

se Department addresses... For TIM.IT: ab...@tim.it ab...@telecomitalia.it ab...@business.telecomitalia.it For ALICE.IT: ab...@retail.telecomitalia.it I hope this helps. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com

Re: [mailop] Spamfolder mini rant (Was: Contact Google Postmaster)

it throws up security warnings > if you try and enable it. They´re pretty clear they don´t want their > customers using it, so why would they go out of their way to suppor tht usage? [sNip] Interestingly, Google's GMail allows access to external eMail accounts via POP3.

Re: [mailop] ebay postmaster contact

> Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop schrieb: > > Marco Moock via mailop wrote: > > > > > Is there any way to contact them so they can figure out > > > the source of those mails? > > > > Have you inspected the SMTP headers and grepped mail &g

Re: [mailop] ebay postmaster contact

___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc. Vancouver, British Columbia, Cana

Re: [mailop] Extortion spam from OVH-hosted *.sbs domains

> According to Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop > : > > I'm just chiming in here with some support for you because I know a > >few people who use OVH as well. > > > > Blocking on a case-by-case basis is the better approach so that > &

Re: [mailop] DKIM signed with parent domain

e that DMARC can control that, but how will Google handle it? > > > -- > kind regards > Marco > > Send spam to asdfasd...@cartoonies.org > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/li

Re: [mailop] [Phishtank-users] Phish report (registration is disabled)

[sNip] I apologize. I sent this to the wrong address. Please disregard. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada https://www.i

Re: [mailop] Extortion spam from OVH-hosted *.sbs domains

I'm just chiming in here with some support for you because I know a few people who use OVH as well. Blocking on a case-by-case basis is the better approach so that legitimate (non-spamming) hosts aren't penalized. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardso

Re: [mailop] [Phishtank-users] Phish report (registration is disabled)

; hxxps://prod[.]stpmex[.]com/spei > > You are providing services to the people operating the Website while it is > very obviously being used for fraud. > I'm writing to request that you take it down as soon as possible. > We attach evidence of the apocryphal site, wh

Re: [mailop] [External] seeking a spamtrap milter

> On 2024-01-23 12:35, Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop wrote: > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> I suspect this exists, but can't come up with the right search. > >>> > >>> I have domains that should never receive mail. I'

Re: [mailop] [External] seeking a spamtrap milter

quot;A" and "" records in the absence of an MX records (and sometimes in addition to the presence of an MX record when any or all of the defined MXes rejects their attempts with 4yz {temporary} or 5yz {permanent} SMTP error codes). -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.

Re: Impressed again

Rick Womer wrote: >Wow! > >My favorites of this =excellent= collection: > >- The house fronts reflected in the water ( # 75? A more viewer-friendly >numbering scheme would be nice.) >- The houses fronting on the canal, with reflections (#60) >- The roomful of bottles of beer, >- The church fr

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact?

to provide a bit more detail (e.g., a link to a Spamhaus listing) as I'd be happy to try to assist (as I'm sure others on this mailing list would be happy to as well). -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate C

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact?

> On 2024-01-19 at 15:42:49 UTC-0500 (Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:42:49 -0800) > Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop > > is rumored to have said: > > > Spamhaus makes the DROP data available (which I believe is also > > included in their SBL), which is useful

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact?

> On 2024-01-19 12:42, Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop wrote: > >> On 2024-01-19 06:47, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:31:19PM +0100, hg user wrote: > >>>> Ok sorry not "most" but "some may".

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact?

roviders including the same data from one source is that errors can unfairly penalize with major impact that DNSBL operators generally try to prevent. > A great believer in sharing, but we do all have to pay the bills. The entire open source software movement is probably one of the ver

Re: [mailop] Anyone else noticing an increase in spam from Office365 distribution lists?

o discover who actually reads and acts upon > messages to postmas...@microsoft.com or ab...@microsoft.com eventually > returned the answer "nobody, really". > > mdr They're no longer bouncing from those addresses? I guess that's progress of a sort.

Re: [mailop] Anyone else noticing an increase in spam from Office365 distribution lists?

> On 19/01/2024 00:33, Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop wrote: > > The blacklists seem to be blocking mostly the ones that send > > directly from @.onmicrosoft.com addresses, which > > should make filtering easy if we can confirm for certain that no > >

Re: [mailop] Anyone else noticing an increase in spam from Office365 distribution lists?

; xpfyc9f.onmicrosoft.com > xx31656.onmicrosoft.com > xxkm2i6.onmicrosoft.com > xyl9v2y.onmicrosoft.com > zeusshow.onmicrosoft.com > > > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinf

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact?

> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:19PM Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop < > mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > > You'll likely be interested in the reputation score, which is > > presently showing as "Poor" for that IP address (66.175.222.108):

Re: [mailop] Spamhaus contact?

ww.talosintelligence.com/reputation_center/lookup?search=66.175.222.108 If any of your lists don't satisfy the "confiremd opt-in" requirement, then correcting that will help over time. (If you need any assistance with this, feel free to contact me off-list.) -- Postmaster -

Re: [mailop] Samsung and SIZE

unications have improved tremendously over the past few deaces, and the availability of high-speed internet has also become widespread, so overall this isn't really a major issue anymore. > Best regards, Sebastian Nielsen > > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org >

Re: [mailop] Anyone else noticing an increase in spam from Office365 distribution lists?

felist from the > hypothetical block rule, and that would be it. > > - Mark Alley > > BQ_END > > > BQ_END > > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list

Re: [mailop] Samsung and SIZE ("Date:" header tampering)

ted, or it's delayed in one or more mail server queues for any number of reasons (e.g., prolonged network outages, awaiting manual inspection by overburdened staff, etc.), which is tracked by "Received:" headers. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand.

Re: [mailop] Displaying logos

idual" designation. > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop > Skickat: den 15 januari 2024 02:46 > Till: Mailop > Ämne: Re: [mailop] Displaying logos > > Let's Encrypt style automation will be necessary with a la

Re: [mailop] Displaying logos

; requires no manual or human check, be fully automated, and pose no security > consequences for the email world. > Since the validation data would be sourced from a instance that already is > vetted with a ICAO certificate, it could become a very secure solution, with > no risk of

Re: [mailop] Anyone else noticing an increase in spam from Office365 distribution lists?

ed for > > email. Domains should be added, verified and configured properly for > > outbound mail. > > > > I would personally say that you will lose practically no real email by > > rejecting those subdomains completely - and if you get complaints from > > actual M365 tenant customer

Re: [mailop] Displaying logos

> On Saturday 13/01/2024 at 3:59 pm, John Levine via mailop wrote: > > It appears that Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop > > said: > >> > >>> > >>> It might work to put a gold border around checked logos and a > >>

Re: [mailop] Displaying logos

eep changing their user interfaces (which drives some users absolutely bonkers to the point where they tend to become desensitized to user interface nuances). Your first idea is much better. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.c

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

.) > I favour the approach of indicating to the end-user somehow whether > a logo is certified with valid PEM data because, overall, this > generally leads to a better end-user experience. I actually think > this approach should be encouraged in the specfiication. -- Post

Re: [mailop] BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

> On 10.01.2024 at 21:59 Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop > wrote: > > > What's missing from BIMI in its current form? The option > > for mail server oparators to use the same TLS certificates that > > we're already using for our mail servers (and

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

ly leads to a better end-user experience. I actually think this approach should be encouraged in the specfiication. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Netwo

Re: [mailop] MUA images, avatars and icons (X-Face PBM image format)

have today" in the abstract. :D -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CNA - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada https://www.inter-corporate.com/

Re: [mailop] BIMI boycott?

rry to disappoint with the whole being an unreleased > proprietary email client part. Excellent, and no worries about the proprietary part -- I asked because I didn't know what the intended outcome is. > Groetjes, > Louis > > > Op donderdag 11 januari 2024 om 10:10, s

Re: [mailop] MUA images, avatars and icons

nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/01/why-does-it-feel-like-amazon-is-making-itself-worse.html > > [https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/01/why-does-it-feel-like-amazon-is-making-itself-worse.html] > > 3- > > https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/12/nope-this-isnt-the-https-

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

making it authenticated? A trademark check? > > > > Bastian > > > > -- > > Extreme feminine beauty is always disturbing. > > -- Spock, "The Cloud Minders", stardate 5818.4 > > ___ &

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

r on that because I forgot about that point. Thanks, Tim, for reminding me of this. > -Tim > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:11PM Marcel Becker via mailop > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:58AM Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop > > wrote: > > > >>

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:58AM Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop < > mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > > > > They could > > easily afford set up a company, get a Trademark, and then use a > > different logo image when sending their junk eMails. >

Re: [mailop] BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

ing > > your > > logo in an easily accessible and standard way :) > > > > Groetjes, > > Louis > > > > > > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop -- Postm

Re: [mailop] BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

ew, or a few dozen, as you need, and from a few different domains so you can see what different logos look like in an Inbox folder. > Groetjes, > Louis > > > Op woensdag 10 januari 2024 om 21:58, schreef Randolf Richardson, Postmaster > via > mailop : > > > We lo

Re: [mailop] BIMI boycott?

This was a bad idea from the beginning (I would even say, a crazy idea) and > > will still be a bad idea no matter how much work and effort you put into it. > > So maybe it's better not to waste that effort at all and direct it towards > > something actually useful. > >

Re: [mailop] BIMI boycott? Lookup tool, why we publish BIMI anyway, and intellectual property law considerations

ifferently? > Like accepting BIMI logos only depending on valid bog standard cert and > DMARC, boycotting the moneygrab scheme? > > Its also may be yet another reader-engagement tracker. Why do those things > always have to be out of band. > > I wish y'all a happy new

Re: [mailop] Any evidence of SMTP smuggling in the wild - yet?

pecial trust > relationship or allowed to relay to each other. As I understand it, such techniques can be automated, which means that spamware could be created that takes advantage of the SMTP Smuggling exploit. -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-c

Re: [mailop] SMTP dictionary attacks from 20.42.100.251 (one of Microsoft's IP addresses)

> Am 01.01.2024 um 01:46:44 Uhr schrieb Randolf Richardson, Postmaster > via mailop: > > > Is anyone seeing large numbers of dictionary attacks from > > 20.42.100.251 (which is owned by Microsoft)? I'm curious if they're > > engaging in large-scale targ

[mailop] SMTP dictionary attacks from 20.42.100.251 (one of Microsoft's IP addresses)

ing to the IP address yields only the default Ubuntu Linux web page from a fresh install of Apache HTTPd. P.S.: I don't bother reporting abuse directly to Microsoft anymore because in the past they just bounced every message sent to their postmaster@ and abuse@ accounts. I'm also not

Re: [mailop] Gmail now deferring email which meets their published reqs

it for about 10 > > years. Its inbound MX and outbound SMTP host is mail.simonandkate.net, > > which has a valid PTR associated with the IP address noted above (again, > > which has been in place for many years). > > > > howiesue.net has a valid hard-fail/rej

Re: [mailop] Malformed To: header

atmail.com / (312) 725-0130 (Chicago) > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson, CN

Re: [mailop] Malformed To: header

(@ char in it), thus > my MTA is right, but... > > Please, am i too strict with this syntax check or this ML is too > lax in that (or both)? > > regards > > -- > Slavko > https://www.slavino.sk/ > ___ > mailop maili

[mailop] Solution to SMTP Smuggling -- postfix smtpd update for Debian (Linux) v12/bookworm

*** A special note of apprecaition goes to the Debian developers, and the entire team of people who work on Debian and contribute to the project, for working on this over the holiday season -- your efforts are important and tremendously helpful. Thank you. *** -- Postmaster - postmas..

Re: [mailop] Gmail now deferring email which meets their published reqs

r help, because they ignore it > unless you attach valid and current mis-classified headers from within gmail. > Umm.. how can I do that when they're not accepting the email?  > > Simon Wilson > M: 0400 121 116 -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf

Re: [mailop] Office 365 spam is getting ridiculous (besmartforgoodlife DOT com)

ham. Our blacklist isn't an outright block, but > if Microsoft can't get their act together maybe a block is what we all > need to do collectively. This is worse than the last few years of Gmail > SEO spam. > ___ > mailop mailing list

[mailop] SMTP Smuggling, a short-term workaround for Postfix smtpd

d contribute to the project, for working on this over the holiday season -- your efforts are important and tremendously helpful. Thank you. *** -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services,

Re: [mailop] DKIM validity period (anti-forgery vs. anti-spying)

> In message <6585e535.11582.3a72...@postmaster.inter-corporate.com>, > Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop writes > > >> The most commonly seen method of tracking is probably inclusion of > >> specifically crafted links in the message, that refer to

Re: [mailop] DKIM validity period (anti-forgery vs. anti-spying)

> Dnia 22.12.2023 o godz. 10:54:54 Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop > pisze: > > > Tracking/spying elements in email messsages are usually intended to spy on > > > the *recipient* - did the recipient read the email at all, did he clicked > >

Re: [mailop] DKIM validity period (anti-forgery vs. anti-spying)

, >Jaroslaw Rafa >r...@rafa.eu.org > -- > "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there > was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub." > ___ > mailop mailing list &

Re: [mailop] Microsoft rejecting their own headers

stomer will realize soon that they are > > missing some mails and will, as usual, put the blame on us instead of > > microsoft. > > > > Regards, > > Laurent > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] 451-Reject due to policy restrictions from web.de and gmx.de

especially so close to Christmas. > > Kind regards > Andreas > > -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada https://www.inter-corporate.

Re: [mailop] Sendgrid phish of the day

.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly -- Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc. Vancouver, British C

Re: [mailop] Another very strange microsoft originated email??

te that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely > those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company. > ___ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop > -- Postmast

Re: [mailop] salesforce phishing emails

on this matter too. > Regards > Giovanni > > > -- > > Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards, > > Arne Jensen > > > > ___ > > mailop mailing list > > mailop@mailop.org > > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/

Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools data missing recently - anyone else?

I'm greeted by the message "No data to display at this time. Please come back later" for all reports, even when setting the duration to the maximum of 120 days. Hopefully it's only a temporary poroblem. > Is anyone else seeing data missing from Google

Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

Google. > > > > With Cloudflare, I've never see any of their outbound resolver IP > > addresses have any PTR records. I haven't ever seen Cloudflare document > > it like OpenDNS or Google. > > > > With the above possible ways to retrieve the OpenDNS and Goo

Re: [mailop] Outlook.com losing eMail messages and SNDS reporting failures

86d1-708d255c996d > > https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook_com/forum/all/email-accepted-by-hotmail-but-not-delivered/83621726-60f8-46ce-9416-daf2385acca3 > > I for one would love to see this topic validated, but all I find across > the internet seems to be gaslighting like "Is

[mailop] Outlook.com losing eMail messages and SNDS reporting failures

but now they're only presenting empty files (0 bytes). Does anyone know if this just a temporary problem with SNDS that occurs from time-to-time, or is there something more that we need to do to get meaningful results from SNDS? (The ChatGPT AI support bots have not been he

Rock 'n Roll, Rush and Pentax

Around the 1:24 :-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIAcVSSHJgc -- Mark Roberts - Photography and Multimedia www.robertstech.com 617-276-7369 -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directl

Re: [mailop] salesforce phishing emails

o be abuse. So, basically they want [potential] victims to come forward and do the job of their abuse desk and/or postmaster? That's awful. :( Salesforce: Please change your policies in ways that stop normalizing "opt-out.&

Re: [mailop] Convincing clients of the importance of eMail recipient consent for mailing list subscriptions

on messages. Even after THAT, I find > that maybe 25-50% of the folks who ask to subscribe never respond to the > confirmation email. > > A list of 100 validated and interested folks is worth far more than a list > of 1000 "average users". > > > > On Mon

Re: [mailop] Convincing clients of the importance of eMail recipient consent for mailing list subscriptions

> Am 27.11.2023 um 10:42:58 Uhr schrieb Randolf Richardson, Postmaster > via mailop: > > > Many marketing people seem to be terrified of the idea of > > users having to confirm their consent when subscribing to a mailing > > list (e.g., by following a unique

[mailop] Convincing clients of the importance of eMail recipient consent for mailing list subscriptions

ure that "every eMail recipient consented" without the begrudging "we do this because we have to" perspective. Thank you for your thoughts and ideas. Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com Randolf Richardson - rand...@inter-corporate.com Inter-Corporate Computer

[clamav-users] clamav now has a tempfail?

Hi Running ClamAV 1.0.1/27101 on AlmaLinux release 8.8 with sendmail 8.15.2-34.el8 I have extra milters: opendkim, mimedefang I see this in my maillog: Nov 23 14:55:16 korolev sendmail[870567]: 3AN3tFIF870567: Milter add: header: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 101.0.105.104 Nov 23 14:55:16 k

Re: Ubuntu 18 + PHP 8.2 + PDO: can't find drivers

Am 23.09.23 um 20:56 schrieb Chris Kelly: On Ubuntu "18.04.6 LTS (Bionic Beaver)": # apt-cache search pgsql | grep 8 pike7.8-pg - PostgreSQL modules for Pike pike8.0-pg - PostgreSQL modules for Pike # apt-cache search pgsql | grep php php-pgsql - PostgreSQL module for PHP [default] php7.2-pg

[pkg-go] Delivery report

-lists.debian.net Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 (undefined status) Remote-MTA: dns;alioth-lists-mx.debian.net (185.73.44.171) Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 This message has been identified as spam (scored 6.9). Please contact postmaster if you feel this is in error. X-PowerMTA-BounceCategory: spam-related

Delivery report

-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 (undefined status) Remote-MTA: dns;alioth-lists-mx.debian.net (185.73.44.171) Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 This message has been identified as spam (scored 6.9). Please contact postmaster if you feel this is in error. X-PowerMTA

Delivery report

: rfc822;pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 (undefined status) Remote-MTA: dns;alioth-lists-mx.debian.net (185.73.44.171) Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 This message has been identified as spam (scored 8.3). Please contact postmaster if you feel this is in error

Test for [arch...@jab.org]

This is a test to trace the subscriber currently generating spam. Apologies to the other subscribers for the noise.

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-2456) Support in-Keyword for Strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Postmaster updated GROOVY-2456: --- Attachment: deliveryreport.txt originalmail.eml This message was created

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-2456) Support in-Keyword for Strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Postmaster updated GROOVY-2456: --- Attachment: deliveryreport.txt originalmail.eml This message was created

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-2456) Support in-Keyword for Strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Postmaster updated GROOVY-2456: --- Attachment: deliveryreport.txt originalmail.eml This message was created

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-2456) Support in-Keyword for Strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Postmaster updated GROOVY-2456: --- Attachment: deliveryreport.txt originalmail.eml This message was created

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-2456) Support in-Keyword for Strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Postmaster updated GROOVY-2456: --- Attachment: deliveryreport.txt originalmail.eml This message was created

[jira] [Updated] (GROOVY-2456) Support in-Keyword for Strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-2456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Postmaster updated GROOVY-2456: --- Attachment: deliveryreport.txt originalmail.eml This message was created

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >