On 20 Jul 2014, at 00:16, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
James, you're not the only one that was confused by that. Please, Milos,
stay focused on being helpful and furthering the Wikimedia mission (as you
do
On 3 Jul 2014, at 12:14, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-03 14:12 GMT+03:00 James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com:
Can someone please explain to me why the Foundation can't give
User:Dispenser 24 TB on Tool Labs?
Context please?
There's been a discussion of this topic going on at:
I think this would be more factually accurate:
https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Wikimedian_in_Residence_2014_reviewdiff=58518oldid=58516
As a general comment: please consider including an executive summary along with
a review that is this long. It's very difficult to find the key
Please don't make personal attacks. :-(
Mike
On 1 Jul 2014, at 21:55, James Farrar james.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Andy, please don't be a tit.
On 1 Jul 2014 20:39, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 1 July 2014 20:12, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.com wrote:
All of you
On 1 Jul 2014, at 22:11, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
On 1 July 2014 21:57, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
I think this would be more factually accurate:
https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Wikimedian_in_Residence_2014_reviewdiff=58518oldid=58516
Hi Erik,
Thanks for sharing this update. It looks like a move in a good direction for
WMF's engineering.
I am worried by how short-term the current plans/goals are, though. I know that
a lot of work that the engineering department does, particularly with regards
software, which can only be
On 10 Jun 2014, at 17:12, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
We have smartened it up already through the support of UK Wikipedians but it
has its limits.
This is the bit I don't understand. What does the current proposal do that
*can't* be done on the wiki? Why do we *have* to
On 10 Jun 2014, at 20:16, Dan Garry (Deskana) djgw...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously for the more regular, hardcore WMUK volunteers, the wiki will
remain the primary resource, and if someone wants to become a hardcore
volunteer then they'll need to deal with that. But for other casual
Couldn't WMUK accept paypal/cheques/etc. through their standard donation
mechanisms (e.g. via a special page on donate.wikimedia.org.uk) and forward
them on to the Wikimania budget?
Thanks,
Mike
On 4 Jun 2014, at 20:54, Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl wrote:
Dear Stuart,
Stuart Prior
On 2 Jun 2014, at 13:27, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
So for trustee expenses: not all of the board went as trustees, as two (at
least) were invited as speakers - reporting that as a trustee cost wouldn't
be accurate. As to staff – I attended as the Chief Executive, but the
For info: the relevant Commons category for Wikimedia slide decks is at:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikimedia_presentations
... but that's a bit of a mess (e.g. no ordering by date, and videos are mixed
in with slide decks), so it may be tricky to find what you need there...
I believe she leaves at the end of this month.
Thanks,
Mike
On 21 May 2014, at 16:13, Michael Maggs mich...@maggs.name wrote:
Yes, I think that was probably her very last decision.
Michael
On 21 May 2014, at 15:11, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2014 14:39, rexx
On 15 May 2014, at 20:50, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 15 May 2014 12:29, Michael Maggs mich...@maggs.name wrote:
Andy, you mentioned that business cards were promised. So far as I can
recall, nothing along these lines has been brought to the board for at least
a year.
On 10 May 2014, at 19:43, Balázs Viczián balazs.vicz...@wikimedia.hu wrote:
You may also visit an overview of the financial information presented in
these proposals, which includes information for all proposals in this
round:
This is a test message to see if my email from this address gets through to the
list or not. If it does, then yay my problem with posting to this list is
fixed, and please accept my apologies for the spam. If it doesn't, then how did
you get hold of this message?!
Thanks,
Mike
Oh, cool, this came straight through. :-) I no longer need to use my work
address to send emails to this list - yay. :-) Apologies again for the spam!
Thanks,
Mike
On 8 May 2014, at 21:12, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
This is a test message to see if my email from this address gets
Hi all,
It's good to see the role of the WMUK committees being focused on - thank you
Michael for starting this.
However, I think it's a real shame that the committees are becoming much more
advisory than they were supposed to be when they were originally envisaged and
created just a few
Hi Ellie,
I've registered, but I found the form rather confusing when it came to saying
what information should be on the badge. There were three sections for this
that were required - first line/name, second line/username and third
line/affiliation. OK, name - Mike Peel. Erm, second
Jon, I think you're a week behind with reading the signpost, and meant to link
to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-04-23/WikiProject_report
...
Thanks,
Mike
On 1 May 2014, at 16:38, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
To the altar—Catholicism
I think I might have been the person that switched this list from per-email to
digest moderator emails - the list was certainly getting quite a bit of spam
back when I was a list admin, and I doubt the situation has improved since then.
I would support Fæ being taken off moderation here, but it
Hi Risker,
On 27 Apr 2014, at 16:01, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
However, having accepted the validity of the proposal, the FDC does not
have the authority to delegate its role.
I think you're misunderstanding what has been delegated here. The FDC is asking
WMDE to do the 'staff
On 27 Apr 2014, at 20:19, Bence Damokos bdamo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 April 2014 15:01, Bence Damokos bdamo...@gmail.com wrote:
What is currently stopping a community assessment from being carried
out? (If indeed the
of the analysis.
Thanks,
Nicole Ebber
International Affairs
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
http://wikimedia.de
On 24 Apr 2014 21:09, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Hi all,
This round of proposals to the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
presents a new and interesting challenge
Hi Risker,
Thanks for your thoughts.
Instead I suggest that the FDC seek authorization from the Board for an
independent third party review if it feels that there is not the necessary
ability for the FDC to produce its own assessment.
I'm personally curious to know whether you have any
Hi James,
On 21 Apr 2014, at 19:16, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Philippe and I have worked hard to try and make the 'staff' user group as
it traditionally stands a very 'as needed' right and so the default is now
to give out no rights or smaller, more focused, rights (meta
On 21 Apr 2014, at 19:35, James Alexander jalexan...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Right now it's on a google doc because it is a public view of the tracking
spreadsheet Philippe and I use (which includes staff whose rights requests
were denied or removed as well as some contact info and additional
Hi all,
Stephen, thanks for posting this. :-)
From my perspective, there's two items of particular interest here that I
haven't seen discussed on this list or elsewhere - namely Disrupting the
disrupters and Community council. The board minutes aren't really sufficient
to understand the
Forwarding per Fæ's request...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Fæ fae...@gmail.com
Subject: Fwd: [Wikimediauk-l] [Wikimedia-l] Rating Wikimedia content (was Our
next strategy plan-Paid editing)
Date: 17 April 2014 10:09:14 BST
To: Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net
Hi Mike, could you repost
On 17 Apr 2014, at 20:01, Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com wrote:
The WMF's position has been made clear, that it's Wikipedia's rules and
norms that should be followed.
It sounds like this is something that needs to be made clearer in the WMF's
staff handbook (presumably such a thing
Hi Erik,
I'd say 'maybe'. I think this sort of work is worth supporting in general, but
the question should be whether providing the support would improve the content
and/or provision of the Wikimedia projects. I'd like to see a good
community-driven process that would determine whether such
On 13 Apr 2014, at 19:32, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 13/04/14 16:16, Fæ wrote:
With regard to cooling it, I suppose it is hard to stop my experience
and long term frustration in being unable to follow through or have a
frank discussion on essential changes the charity needed
Many thanks to Bence for running this very useful service. :-)
I wish it could be based on-wiki, but that would require quite a lot of work to
import the posts and also to provide RSS feeds etc. - moving content between
Wordpress and MediaWiki is sadly very difficult! It would take a very
Hi Jon,
I'm confused - how can it be a 'small internal meeting' that also includes
people that aren't 'internal' to the WMUK office? And why, if it's an internal
meeting, did it take place on a weekend necessitating staff to give up their
Saturday?
Thanks,
Mike
On 7 Apr 2014, at 09:40, Jon
On 7 Apr 2014, at 15:12, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin victuall...@gmail.com wrote:
Bar liam.
Liam was the first WiiR, but not, I understand, in conjunction with WMUK.
That depends on what you mean by 'conjunction with'. He was
On 7 Apr 2014, at 16:21, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
On 7 April 2014 16:08, Michael Peel michael.p...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
On 7 Apr 2014, at 15:12, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 7 April 2014 13:11, Roger Bamkin victuall...@gmail.com
I'm not sure I want to be subscribed to this mailing list any more. :-( What
happened to the intelligent conversation that used to take place here?
Thanks,
Mike
On 7 Apr 2014, at 22:38, Carlos M. Colina ma...@wikimedia.org.ve wrote:
Look, there is too much drama in telenovelas to add another
Erm, no, it is standard (good) practice!
Mike
On 31 Mar 2014, at 12:28, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
It is not standard practice for a list of attendees to Wikimedia conferences
to be published. It is up to the individuals in question whether they want it
be known
Hi all,
I'm testing the idea of having a summer student here at my university who would
contribute to Wikipedia articles on physics/astronomy as a way of learning how
to write scientific publications (since there's such a good analogy between the
two). A possible issue is that they would get
This strikes me as an excuse rather than a reason. Fæ's questions/points here
don't seem to have been answered. :-(
Thanks,
Mike
On 31 Mar 2014, at 08:10, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Apologies for delay in replying but I have been away.
As previously stated our
On 29 Mar 2014, at 22:10, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
I'm not going to pitch it /as a session/ for Wikimania
Why not? It sounds like that would be an excellent use of time at the
conference that won't happen unless it's proposed as a session...
Thanks,
Mike
Hi Anasuya and Lisa,
I'm not sure I understand what is meant by fiscal sponsor here. I'd have
thought that would mean that the funding to the sponsored organisation is
analogous to a grant provided by the WMF, even thought the money is actually
provided (directly?) by another organisation.
On 19 Mar 2014, at 16:01, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
Perhaps something to be taken offlist with those interested, so we don't
break any confidences?
Or keep things on-list/on-wiki for transparency?
I'd be potentially interested in helping do something here.
Hi Yana,
That's a good change - thanks for making it. :-) Out of curiosity, is there a
reason why you're using v3 rather than v4 of the license?
Thanks,
Mike
On 19 Mar 2014, at 19:46, Yana Welinder ywelin...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
We've started changing the copyright status for the
On 18 Mar 2014, at 13:33, Edward Saperia e...@wikimanialondon.org wrote:
I'd be very keen to see a dedicated technical community manager as a paid
role, who would mostly spend their time going to London tech events and
representing the movement.
That would be really bad on multiple levels
Hi Stevie,
Thanks from me also for sharing this. Some points:
# The images you are using all appear to be copyright violations - not the best
move! Why not attribute the images, or link to where they're available on
Commons or elsewhere? For the image not covered by FoP, why not do something
I'm surprised to see this isn't on the WMUK wiki/list - maybe ask the WMUK
community what they think before sending it?
Thanks,
Mike
On 14 Mar 2014, at 09:28, Stevie Benton stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Thank you everyone for your thoughtful comments. These will be taken into
Probably not. How about 'archived'?
Thanks,
Mike
On 10 Mar 2014, at 22:22, User Mono userm...@outlook.com wrote:
Closed isn't the best word, but do most people know what 'read only' means?
From: peter.southw...@telkomsa.net
To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014
: It can only be read.
On 10/03/14 22:32, Michael Peel wrote:
Probably not. How about 'archived'?
Thanks,
Mike
On 10 Mar 2014, at 22:22, User Mono userm...@outlook.com wrote:
Closed isn't the best word, but do most people know what 'read only' means?
From: peter.southw...@telkomsa.net
On 10 Mar 2014, at 22:42, Michael Snow wikipe...@frontier.com wrote:
On 3/10/2014 3:36 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
Maybe. I worry that it is computer jargon - but perhaps what I suggested is
historian jargon...
It's not so much jargon that's the problem - it's that nearly all websites
On 6 Mar 2014, at 16:37, Michael Peel michael.p...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 16:30, Richard Nevell richard.nev...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
As a chapter we have run the Wikimedian in Residence (WIR) programme since
May 2012, when Andrew Gray started his residency
On 6 Mar 2014, at 16:30, Richard Nevell richard.nev...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
As a chapter we have run the Wikimedian in Residence (WIR) programme since
May 2012, when Andrew Gray started his residency at the British Library.
You've missed out a couple of years of history there - British
... so if it's no longer US-only, then can the currencies be geolocated so they
automatically show up in local currencies rather than USD?
Bug report: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62012
Thanks,
Mike
On 27 Feb 2014, at 17:06, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61917
Thanks,
Mike
On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:32, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
What the fuck are you doing?
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris
akosia...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi Andy,
That rationale makes sense, unless the image was of something more permanent,
or of something that's still there with no expectations of being removed? Is
there an enwp article here?
Thanks,
Mike
On 17 Feb 2014, at 20:42, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
Photographers
On 15 Feb 2014, at 20:43, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 February 2014 20:24, Michael Peel michael.p...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
Perhaps it would be worth WMUK thinking about purchasing such equipment,
either to be made available in the office (which would then require travel
Hi all,
On 11 Feb 2014, at 17:58, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
I'm very sorry about these decisions. Not only because I disagree with them
on the content (although there are one or two aspects I can live with) and
because I think this is very bad for the volunteers, but also
On 11 Feb 2014, at 20:18, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Frédéric, a quick comment:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Frédéric Schütz sch...@mathgen.ch wrote:
Your decision is not you should have a good track
record, it is you should have a good track record AND NOT have
Hi all,
Frank, congratulations on the new job. :-) Can I ask for a clarification on the
funding situation please?
(1) WMF grant money
The Wiki Education Foundation received a grant to get things off the ground
last year as part of the Projects and Events Grants process. The Wiki
Education
Hi Ed,
Thanks for the clarification. :-) Please could you comment on the privacy
issues here? It’s not obvious who has access to the information collected by
accessing the tinyletter page (there’s no privacy link on it, and it’s not
obvious that you’ll be taken to a non-Wikimedia page by
On 10 Feb 2014, at 16:18, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
As the nomination says, there’s no FOP in France, so pictures of modern
buildings in France can’t go on Commons without clear permission… I’m not
sure whether that should be an embarrassment for Commons or for the MEPs
On 10 Feb 2014, at 16:27, brian.mcn...@wikinewsie.org wrote:
I have here, still pinned to my jacket, a bright-yellow press accreditation
card from the EU Parliament. That, quite clearly, and within the guidelines
issued to us, covers permission to film, take photos, etc, etc both inside
Hi all,
When looking for the dates that registration would open for Wikimania 2014, I
was surprised to be asked at:
https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Registration
to join a separate mailing list to be informed when registration will open, at:
https://tinyletter.com/WikimaniaLondon
Is
:40, Michael Peel michael.p...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
...
Care to explain?
+1. If there's a good reason for the secrecy/lack of transparency, it
would be nice for members to have a clue as to why it is needed.
Fae
___
Wikimedia UK mailing
(Re-sending from my work address as emails from my personal address still don’t
get through to this list. :-( )
On 17 Jan 2014, at 17:18, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Hi Stevie,
That’s the first I’ve heard about it - has anything been posted about this
before on the wiki
On 17 Jan 2014, at 19:11, Andrew Lih andrew@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that hasn't come up in the debate is the relative importance of
Wikimedia's approach to video, given the existing video ecosystem. YouTube
enables
On 9 Jan 2014, at 14:32, Katherine Casey fluffernutter.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Add me to the list of people who are surprised the WMF has chosen to handle
this in so public and accusatory a manner. It is presumably their right to
sever business relationships with employees, of course, but they
On 26 Dec 2013, at 18:11, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
You may have got the wrong end of the stick on this one. Releasing on the OGL
is optional, though does appear to be a modern default for many government
agents.
Material released as Crown Copyright cannot be uploaded until expired (50
There’s been quite a lot of discussion of this on the cultural-partners mailing
list (https://intern.wikimedia.ch/lists/listinfo/cultural-partners). As a
result of that, Tom Morris has set up a working page on Commons at:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net
Date: 13 December 2013 18:12:49 GMT
To: UK Wikimedia mailing list wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] What next with QRpedia?
+1 on the leaflet idea. Sending a leaflet to every museum
Could there be a page on meta that documents this tool and its capabilities /
limitations / ways to report issues, please?
Thanks,
Mike
On 3 Dec 2013, at 21:42, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
Jan, please report the issues that you had to the maintainer of the
instance or directly to:
On 1 Dec 2013, at 03:01, Michael Maggs mich...@maggs.name wrote:
On 30 Nov 2013, at 22:01, Charles Matthews charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
Actually, I despair of the entire thread. There is all of £20 at stake here.
There is every reason to economise on staff time, on this
In general, Tom Morris’s email is spot on here.
Choice is always a good approach to take, so saying £X of book vouchers of
your choice would be good, although it would be best to set out a list of what
their choice is (a wiki page that can easily be linked to?) so they don’t ask
for one that
Very nice! It does need a lot of scrolling, though - it would be nice if it had
a simple collapse/expand function (the zoom function’s a bit clunky). A
human-friendly URL would be good too.
Thanks,
Mike
On 8 Nov 2013, at 18:24, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
FYI
--
, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
Very nice! It does need a lot of scrolling, though - it would be nice if it
had a simple collapse/expand function (the zoom function’s a bit clunky). A
human-friendly URL would be good too.
Thanks,
Mike
On 8 Nov 2013, at 18:24, Erik Moeller e
On 11 Oct 2013, at 20:52, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 October 2013 20:49, Strainu strain...@gmail.com wrote:
For this category of people we have OTRS:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/OTRS#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_OTRS.3F
:)
If you want to cut the queue, just
They look like they're linked into CentralAuth/global accounts/SUL to me…
Thanks,
Mike
On 3 Oct 2013, at 18:06, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note that it is especially important to change your passwords on the
Wikimania wikis where you have accounts. These are non-SUL wikis and
Hi Deryck,
It's great to hear that the parallel sessions were recorded. :-) As a
suggestion: those that are asking for these videos might also be willing to
help edit and upload those videos to Commons. Would you be willing to share the
raw recordings with interested individuals so that they
Hi Barbara,
The link doesn't seem to be working - the HTTPS link times out, and the HTTP
version leads to a protected google doc that people need permission to access…
Thanks,
Mike
On 10 Aug 2013, at 10:56, Barbara Fischer barbara.fisc...@wikimedia.de wrote:
Hi folks,
please note that
On 25 Jun 2013, at 22:29, Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 May 2013 19:02, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I believe it requires restarting Mailman, or at least this is how I read
The notice is also available on-wiki at:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiConference_UK_2013/Notice_of_Annual_General_Meeting
Thanks,
Mike
On 14 May 2013, at 14:26, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
All,
It appears that some of the AGM-related emails haven't been
Hi all,
The draft EGM minutes are now available at:
https://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/EGM_2013/Minutes
Sorry that these took so long to prepare. If anyone that was present at the EGM
wants to correct this record, then please let me know, or feel free to edit the
minutes directly before the end of
I'm not sure that the maximum rate is the best comparison to make here. I can
understand that for senior representatives of the US government on official
business, since prestige seems to be an issue there, but for individuals on
charity business?
I'm not saying outrageous, but I am saying
On 13 May 2013, at 22:03, Andrew Lih andrew@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
...Paris and London are both more expensive cities that Hong Kong, so I'd
expect the daily rate here to be closer to $130/night, and ideally less
than
On 28 Apr 2013, at 21:25, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
I'm ambivalent about whether it's appropriate to have staff members
(those who don't independently qualify as community members) voting
or not, but I think in principle Itzik has a very good point - either
*both* WMF and
.
People who don't edit but belong to the movement can have their influence
via the chapters and in future the thorgs.
On 30 April 2013 11:54, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
I'd like to +1 on this, as that only seems fair to me - either we have an
inclusive solution
Congratulations, Andy.
Just to avoid any potential misunderstandings here, can I point out that this
isn't a WMUK-supported WiR position, i.e. WMUK hasn't been involved in
establishing or running this WiR position, and there's no contract between WMUK
and the institution (as there is e.g. with
Indeed, at the 9th Feb board meeting. See the minutes (under 'tech committee')
at:
http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Minutes_9Feb13#Education_committee
Thanks,
Mike
On 12 Apr 2013, at 10:52, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
My recollection from a board meeting is that we
A reminder's now been sent to all members. If you haven't received a copy and
think that you should have, then please email members...@wikimedia.org.uk to
let us know.
Thanks,
Mike
On 10 Apr 2013, at 12:44, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
There'll be a reminder going
On 3 Apr 2013, at 23:38, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
FWIW, I got a renewal reminder on 15/3, renewed the same day, but
didn't get an email about the EGM on the 20th.
Andrew, could you check your spam folder please? I've just checked, and the
email was definitely sent to you
Hi all,
There's currently a proposal on the internal mailing list to close it, as well
as the internal wiki. Although I don't disagree with closing the internal-l
mailing list (it's definitely served its time), I would like us to collectively
reconsider using the internal wiki.
There is
On 3 Apr 2013, at 12:40, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, list of private wikis:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_wikis#Private_wikis
There are 27 private wikis hosted by the WMF, of which 15 for WMF internal
organisation (including committees) and 3 for more
On 3 Apr 2013, at 19:46, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 3 April 2013 03:34, Michael Peel michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
So, rather than close the internal wiki, I'd like to propose a radical
redesign and repurposing of it. Is there the interest and willingness
Hi all,
If you've done anything connected with WMUK recently, then please do take a few
minutes to add a couple of summary sentences about it to the monthly reports.
Stevie put the link to this month's below; there's also the March report that's
being collaboratively drafted at:
Hi Richard,
Many thanks for setting up the livestreaming for today's event. I don't know
how Awdio works - does it keep a copy of the broadcast, or does it just
live-broadcast the audio without keeping a record? If the former, would it be
possible to upload a copy of the record to Commons? It
On 10 Mar 2013, at 22:00, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 March 2013 14:40, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Weeks? the registration on qrpedia.org expires in 5 days. Just let it
expire and let WMUK pick up the domain.
3 days now (weekend? you are working to a deadline now). And usually I
Hi all,
There's a section of this month's Wikimedia research newsletter that might be
of particular interest: UK university lecturers still skeptical and uninformed
about Wikipedia:
Unfortunately it's on the same day as GLAM-WIKI and the EGM…
Thanks,
Mike
On 28 Feb 2013, at 14:39, Richard Symonds richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
Not at all - we're hopefully going to be sending someone along. Any
volunteers to contact the office please!
Richard Symonds
On 19 Feb 2013, at 19:57, Thehelpfulone thehelpfulonew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 February 2013 16:10, Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl wrote:
There will be a special list 'WCA-announcements. If you want to be
informed about Bulletins and discussions, join the list and you will
get
Install Gimp (http://www.gimp.org/) on the visitor laptops and take them along?
Thanks,
Mike
On 12 Feb 2013, at 13:52, Richard Nevell richard.nev...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
My laptop doesn't have image editing software, otherwise I'd bring it, but if
there will be laptops available I'd be
On 11 Feb 2013, at 20:02, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013 7:59 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
For example the next issue is how WMUK plans to pay for the upkeep of
QRpedia given that it wasn't in the budget.
There shouldn't be an issue there. The costs
201 - 300 of 759 matches
Mail list logo
