------------
> *From:* Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Sunday, August 13, 2023 2:00 AM
> *To:* Christopher Hawker
> *Cc:* Dilip Kounmany ; apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net <
> apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
> On Aug 12, 2023, at 10:02 PM, Lu Heng wrote:
>
> stop deformation and personal attack.
Yes, Mr Lu - take a break from your behavior and think about the consequences
of your abrasive attacks. Constituents are leaving apnic-talk.
If you goal is to influence policy - success - people are
> On Aug 13, 2023, at 6:28 AM, David Conrad wrote:
>
>
> it was a mistake to have 5 RIR instead of one, it was mistake to concentrate
> all the powers to single individual for past 25 years, it was mistake to even
> start distinguish difference in race, ethnic, or location on the internet
On Aug 11, 2023, at 9:59 PM, Lu Heng wrote:
> I understand you really like the dictatorship mode where first you then paul
> Wilson can change the bylaw without the membership just like recently
> demonstrated.
I would suggest it is unwise to presume understanding about that which you know
On Aug 10, 2023, at 11:22 PM, Lu Heng wrote:
> We (followed by a geographic region or ethnic group) are (better, capable,
> talented) compared to (rest of the world, other nations, etc).
>
> And this is exactly what me and my colleagues are fighting for here.
So, presumably, you and your
On Aug 10, 2023, at 8:09 PM, Hubert wrote:
> We are fine with the rules set out by the commission in prohibiting the usage
> of whoisdata found in the disclosure system, but our contention has always
> been,
>
> "what if, the data that is found in the disclosure system, which incidentally
>
Dear Mr. Hawker,
Just so you know, we (read: LARUS Limited) did provide consultancy services in
assisting the uninitiated to apply for memberships in RIR, and in fact for
numerous times acted pro bono for certain organisations for good cause,
enclosed herewith the embedded link
Dear Mr. Hawker,
If you can substantiate your statement with empirical data and solid proof, it
is best not to say anything at all.
You are getting delusional as we speak and getting too engrossed on spewing
baseless allegations and libellous statements without undergoing in-depth
research
ubject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
You mean any member who disagrees with you and supports me has integrity
problems?
Wasn't that exactly the same sentence as suggesting every member who voted for
me in the last election because of the bride?
This is
r H.
From: Lu Heng
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 7:19 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: David Conrad ; Dilip Kounmany
; apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
First you suggest members sh
;>>> member
>>>>>>> bases, it is more prone to happen within the APNIC region. And to think
>>>>>>> that it doesn't happen is simply ignorant. It's all about education,
>>>>>>> training and development to mitigat
ithout a member vote
>>>>>> twice in 25 years - once to expand the EC from 5 to 7 members, and to
>>>>>> require a super majority of 75% of all EC members to change the bylaws
>>>>>> without a member vote. This clearly demonstrates that the EC ac
t;
>>>>>> You cannot advocate for "decentralize the registration database so
>>>>>> members will truly own their registration", due to your sheer IP resource
>>>>>> holdings that you hold with an estimated secondary market value exceed
egistration database so
>>>>>> members will truly own their registration", due to your sheer IP resource
>>>>>> holdings that you hold with an estimated secondary market value exceeding
>>>>>> $240m USD. This is in itself, what defin
ines a conflict of interest. I don't
>>>>> think you quite grasp that concept. Further, decentralisation of RIRs will
>>>>> not work, as there needs to be some form of registry to manage
>>>>> allocations.
>>>>> This is what the RIRs are design
ceeding
>>>>> $240m USD. This is in itself, what defines a conflict of interest. I don't
>>>>> think you quite grasp that concept. Further, decentralisation of RIRs will
>>>>> not work, as there needs to be some form of registry to manage
>>>>
members. If you really wanted to get out there
>>>> and campaign for a position on the EC, you would be actively engaging with
>>>> the community like the current EC members have, not be hung up on APNIC
>>>> compiling a list of governance contacts for you to send
ins the same. It's designed to protect
>>> members' rights and allow them to have their voices heard as well as
>>> protect the interests of APNIC as a whole. Allowing individuals who feel
>>> the need to seek redress from APNIC through litigation, then join the EC,
>>> is not i
et" on the world stage, you
>> may want to start advocating to your clients.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christopher H.
>> --
>> *From:* Lu Heng
>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 12, 2023 5:43 PM
>> *To:* Christopher Hawker
>> *Cc:* David
ds,
> Christopher H.
> --
> *From:* Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 12, 2023 5:43 PM
> *To:* Christopher Hawker
> *Cc:* David Conrad ; Dilip Kounmany <
> dlilipk2...@gmail.com>; apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net <
> apnic-talk@lists.apnic
Hi Christopher,
The qualifications of Dr. Felter, while commendable in their own right, do not
preclude him from offering an informed opinion on APNIC's corporate structure.
His expertise in various legal domains reflects a versatile analytical mind,
well-suited to critically assess
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 5:43 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: David Conrad ; Dilip Kounmany
; apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
Are you suggesting every voter that voted for me in the last election is
because of monetary incent
ways held power within APNIC. 20% of its members can call
> for an extraordinary meeting to amend by-law changes, and to effect changes
> only two-thirds of all votes cast are required. This is a substantial
> amount of power that members hold.
>
> Regards,
> Christopher H.
>
_
From: Lu Heng
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 5:28 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
"Every RIR has a stipulation (and is written into their agreements) that
resources delegated by them are used in thei
gt;
> Regards,
> Christopher H.
> --
> *From:* Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 12, 2023 2:59 PM
> *To:* David Conrad
> *Cc:* Dilip Kounmany ; apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net <
> apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>
> *Subject:* [apnic-talk]
23 2:59 PM
To: David Conrad
Cc: Dilip Kounmany ; apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi David:
I understand you really like the dictatorship mode where first you then paul
Wilson can change the bylaw without the membership just lik
Christopher Hawker
Cc: Aftab Siddiqui ; apnic-talk
; m.ch...@larus.net
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
I am not quite sure what you refer to as financial interest here, if you refer
to a functional registry that is vital to every ISP's business
Hi David:
I understand you really like the dictatorship mode where first you then
paul Wilson can change the bylaw without the membership just like recently
demonstrated.
But I am afraid this is not how democracy works.
Just because under paul Wilson’s leader ship, APNIC’s lawyer put road block
come from.
>>>
>>> It's a principle so vital to the future of the internet, we must protect
>>> it not abandon it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 14:07, Christopher Hawker
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aftab, I
y
>>> demonstrated to the APNIC region but to the world, the value that some of
>>> these people bring to the EC.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christopher H.
>>> --
>>> *From:* Aftab Siddiqui
>>> *Sent:* Friday, A
:* Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 12, 2023 12:36 AM
> *To:* Christopher Hawker
> *Cc:* Aftab Siddiqui ; apnic-talk <
> apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>; m.ch...@larus.net
> *Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
>
> Hi
>
>
ts in these entities.
Regards,
Christopher H.
From: Lu Heng
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 12:36 AM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: Aftab Siddiqui ; apnic-talk
; m.ch...@larus.net
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi
None of your st
, 2023 12:11 AM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
The irritation arises from the apparent intention of someone to argue solely
for the purpose of arguing, rather than genuinely proposing ideas that could
gust 11, 2023 11:47 PM
> *To:* Christopher Hawker
> *Cc:* Aftab Siddiqui ; apnic-talk <
> apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>; m.ch...@larus.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
>
> Hi Chris:
>
> Leasing IP is part of internet ser
hristopher Hawker
Cc: Aftab Siddiqui ; apnic-talk
; m.ch...@larus.net
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
Leasing IP is part of internet service, what other service it could be? Food
and beverage? LMAO.
What an assumption, a simple fact, APNIC runs
H.
From: JJ
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 10:53 PM
To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Christopher,
It is with mounting frustration that I find myself addressing the same points
once again, as it seems my
litigation nonetheless is against an
RIR that in essence performs the same functions as APNIC. So it is indeed very
relevant.
Regards,
Christopher H.
From: Hubert
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 11:09 PM
To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedbac
;> *From:* Aftab Siddiqui
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2023 9:12 AM
>> *To:* m.ch...@larus.net
>> *Cc:* Christopher Hawker ; apnic-talk <
>> apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>
>> *Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
>>
>&
hat service region, thus causing a ripple effect for the millions that
> rely on their internet services...
>
> To think that I am "very interested in excluding all ISPs from APNIC
> governance", that I "don't want them to participate in the voting process"
> and tha
, August 11, 2023 10:53 PM
To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Christopher,
It is with mounting frustration that I find myself addressing the same points
once again, as it seems my intended message has yet to be fully grasped. My
August 11, 2023 10:43 PM
To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Dear Mr. Hawker,
Incorporating another new entity to act as corporate trustee is akin to adding
new wine to an old bottle, which does not really alter its original purpose.
r services
such as IP transit, international or domestic backhaul, etc).
Regards,
Christopher H.
From: Lu Heng
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 10:39 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: Aftab Siddiqui ; m.ch...@larus.net
; apnic-talk
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APN
Dear Mr. Hawker,
With all due respect you have let your ego gets in the way and digressed way
too far from our original topic, the goal that we strive to achieve here is to
make known to you all, higher up on the pedestal, what change does the member
truly yearn for in the community, in hoping
Hi Christopher,
It is with mounting frustration that I find myself addressing the same points
once again, as it seems my intended message has yet to be fully grasped. My
intention remains clear: I advocate for APNIC to disclose the corporate
documents or provide a comprehensive write-up
Dear Mr. Hawker,
Incorporating another new entity to act as corporate trustee is akin to adding
new wine to an old bottle, which does not really alter its original purpose. If
APNIC is truly about reinventing the whole wheel, the entire structure has to
be re-incorporated with a fresh board
othing you say will change my mind.
>
> Regards,
> Christopher H.
> --
> *From:* Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2023 9:46 PM
> *To:* Christopher Hawker
> *Cc:* Aftab Siddiqui ; m.ch...@larus.net <
> m.ch...@larus.net>; apnic-talk
> *S
.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Dear Mr. Harker,
Well that one insignificant Associate member that you are talking
condescendingly to, have succeeded in initiating calls for change and exert
enough pressures for the almighty board of APNIC to finall
Dear Mr. Harker,
Well that one insignificant Associate member that you are talking
condescendingly to, have succeeded in initiating calls for change and exert
enough pressures for the almighty board of APNIC to finally disclose the Deed
of Trust which has remained in obscurity for good 20
qui ; m.ch...@larus.net
; apnic-talk
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
I obtained a large portion of the IP address because my business needed it at
that time, just like any other ISP.
Since providing IP is also part of providing connectivity, I don
; m.ch...@larus.net <
> m.ch...@larus.net>; apnic-talk
> *Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
>
> Hi
>
> I think his language is clear, not excluding other people but only me.
>
> If that does not warrant CoC enforcement I don't w
Heng
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 9:27 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: Barry Raveendran Greene ; m.ch...@larus.net
; apnic-talk
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi
I think his language is clear, not excluding other people but only me.
If that does not w
Dear Mr. Hawker,
If all members were to just see APNIC at its face value, based on the ASIC's
search report, then APNIC EC would be nothing but just a mere department of
APNIC PTY LTD and whoever sitting on board would be puppets (for the lack of
better term) controlled by the sole director
To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Christopher,
I wish to reiterate my prior assertions (yet again) that our comprehension of
Paul's imminent designation as a non-voting director, aligned with the
imperative to fulfill Australia's
nsion, its Regional Internet Registries.
>
> Regards,
> Christopher H.
> --
> *From:* Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2023 7:37 PM
> *To:* Christopher Hawker
> *Cc:* Aftab Siddiqui ; m.ch...@larus.net <
> m.ch...@larus.net>; apnic-ta
-
> *From:* Lu Heng
> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2023 9:12 PM
> *To:* Barry Raveendran Greene
> *Cc:* m.ch...@larus.net ; apnic-talk <
> apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>
> *Subject:* [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
>
>
violation) is laughable.
Regards,
Christopher H.
From: Lu Heng
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 9:12 PM
To: Barry Raveendran Greene
Cc: m.ch...@larus.net ; apnic-talk
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Dear Barry:
You mean you
Hi Christopher,
I wish to reiterate my prior assertions (yet again) that our comprehension of
Paul's imminent designation as a non-voting director, aligned with the
imperative to fulfill Australia's resident directors stipulation, remains
steadfast. However, please take note that my current
Dear Barry:
You mean you want to exclude me as a community member?
APNIC secretary, can I have a code of conduct enforced here please.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 19:05, Barry Raveendran Greene
wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 11, 2023, at 21:52, Lu Heng wrote:
> >
> > You are exactly demonstrating the
> On Aug 11, 2023, at 21:52, Lu Heng wrote:
>
> You are exactly demonstrating the issue I am raising here, people like you
> will start to attack and exclude people from different ideologies and values,
> then we will start have divide in the internet, government will start to race
> to get
:37 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: Aftab Siddiqui ; m.ch...@larus.net
; apnic-talk
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Chris:
Your logic simply makes no sense.
All ISP's business depends on the IP address, NTT(or any national telecom)
would depend all i
, where you from, what race are
> you, where do you live, does not matter to serve in internet governance
> organization, APNIC is not a government, it should merely being a technical
> solution provider, and as a technical solution provider, it really does not
> matter where you come from.
&
.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Dear Mr. Hawker,
There is definitely more than it meets the eyes where one was to trace back its
origin, and certainly a search on the register would not reveal much in depth
details, especially when there was involvement
eng
> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2023 4:22 PM
> *To:* Christopher Hawker
> *Cc:* Aftab Siddiqui ; m.ch...@larus.net <
> m.ch...@larus.net>; apnic-talk
> *Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
>
> Hi Aftab and Chris:
>
> Just listen
; m.ch...@larus.net
; apnic-talk
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Aftab and Chris:
Just listen to what your guys are saying here, the exact same argument in the
past hundreds years fuels nationalism, separationism, and ultimately, wars.
We (followed by
]
<https://unitedcablecompany.com/video>
From: Lu Heng
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 8:22 AM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: m.ch...@larus.net ; apnic-talk
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Aftab and Chris:
Just listen to w
Dear Mr. Hawker,
There is definitely more than it meets the eyes where one was to trace back its
origin, and certainly a search on the register would not reveal much in depth
details, especially when there was involvement of Declaration of Trust which
governs the relationship between the
abase" is invalid.
Regards,
Christopher H.
From: Hubert
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 1:09 PM
To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Dear Mr. Conrad,
It is good to see your names popping out here in the
bert
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 12:49 PM
To: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Dear Mr. Siddiqui,
If you are unsure of the origin or the incorporation history of any
organization, it is best not to make any sweeping statement followe
s.apnic.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
>
> Hi Melvin,
>
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 07:00, Melvin Cheng
> wrote:
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Thank you for your detailed and thoughtful response to my viewpoint on
> APNIC's
of these people bring to
the EC.
Regards,
Christopher H.
From: Aftab Siddiqui
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 9:12 AM
To: m.ch...@larus.net
Cc: Christopher Hawker ; apnic-talk
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedback on APNIC proposed By-law reforms
Hi Melvin,
On Fri, 11 Aug
Dear Mr. Conrad,
It is good to see your names popping out here in the discussion as the last
time I came across the same would be the time where the old Deed of Trust was
publicized in the transparency page on APNIC website. If it weren't for your
constant participation and input in internet
Dear Mr. Siddiqui,
If you are unsure of the origin or the incorporation history of any
organization, it is best not to make any sweeping statement followed by IANAL
in public forum as it will create disinformation and lead to confusion for
uninitiated members.
Under the old structure, APNIC
On Aug 10, 2023, at 6:16 AM, Dilip Kounmany wrote:
> If candidates are reaching out to members during the election period, I don't
> see any issue with it.
Presumably you are familiar with the term “spam” as it applies to electronic
communication.
> I'm a bit unclear about what you're
Hi Melvin,
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 07:00, Melvin Cheng
wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> Thank you for your detailed and thoughtful response to my viewpoint on
> APNIC's proposed bylaw reforms. I appreciate the chance to engage in this
> conversation and to clarify my opinions further.
>
> I
Hi,
Imagine for a moment that you are working for a company in the process of hiring
a new employee. Any reasonable hiring process would involve performing some kind
of background check, verification of details etc.
Would you hire a person who is in active litigation with your company?
Of
Hello Chris,
Greetings to you. I'm an active "CD-room" member from the past, looks
today's discussion has been quite lively. I've noticed you're quite the
contrarian, and that adds an interesting dimension.
I couldn't agree more with the sentiment that “Being a member of an
association means you
Dear colleagues,
Below is my feedback for the proposed law reform.
While there are concerns and issues in most of the sections, I will focus on
the most problematic section 6. I have concerns over the legitimacy of the
so-called “election oversight”.
The situation here is like this:
The
Hi Christopher,
I appreciate your acknowledgment that the EC's decisions are geared towards the
collective benefit of all members and the overall advancement of the internet
across the APNIC service region. My suggestion is rooted in the desire to
fortify member protections in the event that
Hi Christopher,
Thank you for your detailed and thoughtful response to my viewpoint on APNIC's
proposed bylaw reforms. I appreciate the chance to engage in this conversation
and to clarify my opinions further.
I understand your perspective on restricting EC memberships to active
Dear APNIC Community,
Hope this email finds you in good health!
...i'm only commenting to thank Christopher
for standing at least for me; hoping that a
great part of the community would recognised
on its welcomed & much appreciated words.
Christopher, while reading your replies, i feel
as the
Hi hubert,
IANAL but IMO, APNIC is an Australian Pty Ltd and maintains whois data of
Australian organisations as well, please read the Spam Act. The unsolicited
calls your (alleged) sister concern NRS did last time were annoying and I
don't want to receive them.
Regards
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On
er:
https://asic.gov.au/for-business/registering-a-company/steps-to-register-a-company/minimum-officeholders/.
Regards,
Christopher H.
From: Melvin Cheng
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 9:31 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc: apnic-talk
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Re: Feedbac
Hi Chris:
Governance matters are an obligation of a membership, just like it is your
obligation as a nation's citizen to vote for your leaders, it's basic
democracy 101.
Governance matters are not marketing, don't confuse political discussion
with commercial operation, EC is a vunleary position.
Hi Lu,
Being contacted by candidates is not a membership obligation. Members do not
"default agree" to receiving unsolicited communications from EC candidates
using information from an operational database as a condition of membership.
There is no argument to be had.
It's not the RIR's
Hi Chris:
I would argue being contacted by candidates is part of your membership
obligation, if you wish to surrender your rights to vote, you are free to
do so and noted to APNIC nad rest of membership, but if you choice to vote
for candidates, in a democratic society, you in default agree to be
Hi Chris:
Your statement about LARUS and Cloud Innovation is simply
misinformation and it is not true. Cloud Innovation, like every other ISP,
obtains the IP address that fully complies with community made policy.
While due to sub judice rules I am not able to future comment on any
ongoing
Hello Hubert,
> the particular code of conduct where member is precluded from reaching
> out/communicate with members whose contact can be found in whoisdata, is
> simply archaic, rigid and over onerous.
I disagree. The Whois system is designed to be a platform in which network
operators can
Hello JJ,
> allowing members to file injunctions against APNIC is ... to provide a legal
> avenue for members to protect their rights in cases where decisions may
> adversely affect their interests.
The EC don't make decisions for the benefit of one member, they make decisions
that benefit
Dear Mr. Hawker,
the particular code of conduct where member is precluded from reaching
out/communicate with members whose contact can be found in whoisdata, is simply
archaic, rigid and over onerous.
In this day and age, a data could easily be replicated and reproduced elsewhere
in other
Dear colleagues,
I hope this email finds you well.
I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding the Proposed By-law Reforms.
In particular, proposal 6, which grants extensive powers to the APNIC EC with
regards to overseeing elections. While the intention may be to ensure fair and
Melvin,
I agree with proposal 1 in its current form. If someone wishes to run as a
candidate for the EC, they should reside within the service region and be
actively involved in APNIC's activities. I see no additional benefit in
allowing people from economies not within the APNIC service
Hi Christopher,
I appreciate the opportunity to further discuss the important matters I raised
regarding the governance and transparency of APNIC.
Pertaining to (1), I understand your perspective on the issue of restricting
the authority to amend bylaws within the jurisdiction of EC
Dear community
I trust this communication finds you all in good health.
I am writing to convey my perspective on APNIC's recently proposed bylaw
reforms. I commend the organization's dedication to improving its governance,
and I firmly believe that constructive dialogue is imperative for
Hello JJ,
(1) When you say that consideration should be given on "restricting the
authority to amend bylaws within the jurisdiction of EC members" are you
suggesting that the EC should not be able to make decisions that affect their
home economy? If this is the case, I don't believe that it is
94 matches
Mail list logo
