ler" <b...@tknow.com<mailto:b...@tknow.com
>> <mailto:b...@tknow.com%3cmailto:b...@tknow.com>>>
>> To: "owen" <o...@delong.com<mailto:o...@delong.com
>> <mailto:o...@delong.com%3cmailto:o...@delong.com>>>
>> Cc: arin-ppml
past 12 - 18 months?
>
> --
> Dani Roisman
>
>
> From: "Bill Buhler" <b...@tknow.com<mailto:b...@tknow.com>>
> To: "owen" <o...@delong.com<mailto:o...@delong.com>>
> Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin
On Sep 30, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Dani Roisman
> wrote:
That’s just billing buckets then, not really based on actual transfer activity.
Maybe it will help to look at more relevant data?
ARIN staff watching - could you point me to any published
On Sep 30, 2015, at 1:15 PM, John Curran
> wrote:
On Sep 30, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Dani Roisman
> wrote:
That’s just billing buckets then, not really based on actual transfer activity.
Maybe it will
rds,
Bill Buhler
From: Dani Roisman [mailto:drois...@softlayer.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:40 AM
To: Bill Buhler; arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Tha
gt;
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On Sep 30, 2015, at 1:15 PM, John Curran
<jcur...@arin.net<mailto:jcur...@arin.net>> wrote:
Unfortunately, we do no
.com%3cmailto:o...@delong.com>>>
Cc:
arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net%3cmailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>>
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 12:59:30 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2
ng.com>>>
> Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net
> <mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net%3cmailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>>
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 12:59:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
> evaluation f
[mailto:drois...@softlayer.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:52 AM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net; Bill Buhler
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Hi Bill,
I'm interested to learn how
ni Roisman <drois...@softlayer.com>; arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Based on the ARIN fee table of ISP classification:
/20 is the max allocation size of a
...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of Mark Mahle
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 7:36 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Bill,
Great compromise proposal.
Can you clarify
addresses for a
> year. Meanwhile the small end users and ISPs could obtain up to a /22 of a
> resource that with a lot of careful use of NAT would support a fairly large
> public network.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bill Buhler
>
> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net &l
, September 28, 2015 1:09 PM
To: Bill Buhler
Cc: Adam Thompson; arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:50 , Bill Buhler <b...@tknow.com<mailto:b...@tkn
,
>
>
>
> Bill Buhler
>
>
>
> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net <mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net>
> [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net <mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net>] On
> Behalf Of Steven Ryerse
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 11:48 AM
&
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 11:11 AM
To: Adam Thompson
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
I’m not going to support anything that provides a blanket exemption
o:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 1:09 PM
> To: Bill Buhler
> Cc: Adam Thompson; arin-ppml@arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
> evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
>
>
> On
, September 28, 2015 12:59:30 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
OK, how about this:
Small end users and ISPs are allowed to obtain IPv4 address blocks without a
needs test as long a
n
done based on the current model.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you wanted to speculate, you would need to spin-up dozens of
entities all with unique mailstops, and you would have to camp on the
addresses for a year. Meanwhil
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On Sep 28, 2015, at 11:50 , Bill Buhler <b...@tknow.com<mailto:b...@tknow.com>>
wrote:
Thanks Owen for your thoughts, it sounds to me li
On 25-Sep-15 14:33, Steven Ryerse wrote:
> Stephen Sprunk on Friday, September 25, 2015 3:26:
>> On 25-Sep-15 12:48, Steven Ryerse wrote: >>> It is time to fix this inequity
>> and removing needs tests would be
>>> a big help to small organizations who really need resources! >> >>
If they
On 9/26/2015 12:11 PM, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
> Owen,
>
> On 25/09/15 20:24, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Please provide the metrics on which you base this assertion. How was
>> RIPE-NCC accuracy measured prior to the policy change and to what
>> extent was it improved as a result of this policy
Owen,
On 25/09/15 20:24, Owen DeLong wrote:
Please provide the metrics on which you base this assertion. How was
RIPE-NCC accuracy measured prior to the policy change and to what
extent was it improved as a result of this policy change. What
mechanism was used to determine that the measured
t regards,
>
>
>
> Bill Buhler
>
>
>
> *From:* arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Ryerse
> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2015 11:48 AM
> *To:* Owen DeLong
>
> *Cc:* arin-ppml@arin.net
> *Subject:* Re: [
, Dani Roisman <drois...@softlayer.com> wrote:
> | Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:53:59 -0400
> | From: ARIN <i...@arin.net>
> | To: arin-ppml@arin.net
> | Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
> | evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4
ot exist!
>>
>>
>>
>> It is time to fix this inequity and removing needs tests would be a
>big
>> help to small organizations who really need resources!
>>
>>
>>
>> *Steven Ryerse*
>>
>> *President*
>>
>> *100 Ashfor
Hi Owen,
On 25/09/15 21:56, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Sep 25, 2015, at 04:23 , Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
Hi Owen,
On 25/09/15 09:23, Owen DeLong wrote:
It’s not ARIN’s mission to prevent profits nor did I say it was.
My point is that Elvis support for removing policy is
One more thing regarding the moving bits businesses..
On 25/09/15 21:56, Owen DeLong wrote:
Do you offer any services involving moving bits between your clients
and other organizations? Or are you strictly in the address
marketing/management business? From everything you have said to me,
I’ve
arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating
needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of
IPv4 netblocks
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9
Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4
transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council
Ryerse <srye...@eclipse-networks.com>; Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com>
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Having watched this for the last couple of years
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:48 , Steven Ryerse
> wrote:
>
> Owens comment from below:
> “2. To the extent that there is supply, anyone who needs addresses can get
> them already. Needs-based evaluation does not prevent those with need from
> getting addresses… It
25, 2015 3:03 PM
To: Steven Ryerse <srye...@eclipse-networks.com>
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
That’s an interesting take on the “inequity”…
H
-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On 25-Sep-15 12:48, Steven Ryerse wrote:
> Owens comment from below:
>
> “2. To the extent that there is supply, anyone who needs addresses
> can get them already. Needs-based evaluation does not prevent those
@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On 25-Sep-15 14:05, Steven Ryerse wrote:
> It’s pretty obvious that if needs testing goes away, Legacy blocks will
> become much more ava
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On Sep 25, 2015, at 04:42 , Elvis Daniel Velea
<el...@velea.eu<mailto:el...@velea.eu>> wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 25/09/15 06
Ryerse <srye...@eclipse-networks.com>
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:48 , Steven Ryerse
<srye...@eclipse-networks.com<mailto:sry
Ryerse
<srye...@eclipse-networks.com<mailto:srye...@eclipse-networks.com>>
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml@arin.net>
Subject: RE: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
T
: Friday, September 25, 2015 1:24 PM
To: el...@velea.eu
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On Sep 25, 2015, at 04:42 , Elvis Daniel Velea
<el...@velea.eu<mai
the transfer.
Regards,
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Dul
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
One
3:46 PM
> To: Steven Ryerse <srye...@eclipse-networks.com>
> Cc: Mike Winters <mwint...@edwardrose.com>; arin-ppml@arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
> evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
>
n
>>> certain sections of the NRPM to increase the database accuracy?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
>>> Behalf Of ARIN
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 201
24, 2015 4:37 PM
> To: el...@velea.eu
> Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
> evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
>
> Of course your position wouldn’t have anything to do with the pr
4, 2015 6:20 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
| Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:53:59 -0400
| From: ARIN <i...@arin.net>
| To: arin-ppml@arin.net
| Subject: [arin-
...@arin.net> on behalf of
> Dani Roisman <drois...@softlayer.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 6:20 PM
> To: arin-ppml@arin.net
> Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
> evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblock
f the NRPM to increase the database accuracy?
-Original Message-
From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of ARIN
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:54 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of Mike Burns
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:35 PM
To: Leif Sawyer <lsaw...@gci.com>; arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 net
; arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
- Original Message -
From: "Leif Sawyer" <lsaw...@gci.com>
Should ARIN begin the process of streamlin
On Sep 24, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Keeping needs basis in the NRPM will only drive the transfers underground.
> Some are already using all kind of financial tricks (futures contracts, lease
> contracts, etc) and are waiting for the needs basis
t; certain sections of the NRPM to increase the database accuracy?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
> Behalf Of ARIN
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:54 PM
> To: arin-ppml@arin.net
> Subject: [arin-pp
Hi John,
On 24/09/15 23:16, John Curran wrote:
On Sep 24, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
+1
Keeping needs basis in the NRPM will only drive the transfers underground. Some
are already using all kind of financial tricks (futures contracts, lease
contracts, etc)
-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:37 PM
To: el...@velea.eu
Cc: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Of course your position
n sections of the NRPM to increase the database accuracy?
-Original Message-
From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On Behalf
Of ARIN
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 12:54 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating n
r 23, 2015 12:54 PM
To: arin-ppml@arin.net
Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9
Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of
IPv4
IN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9
Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of
IPv4 netblocks
On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
"ARIN-prop-
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:51:29PM +0300, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
> +1
>
> Keeping needs basis in the NRPM will only drive the transfers underground.
> Some are already using all kind of financial tricks (futures contracts,
> lease contracts, etc) and are waiting for the needs basis criteria to
and remove "need" as a criteria in
>>> certain sections of the NRPM to increase the database accuracy?
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-boun...@arin.net] On
>>> Behal
- Original Message -
From: "Leif Sawyer"
Should ARIN begin the process of streamlining the IPv4 policy so that it
is
geared more toward the transfer market, and remove "need" as a criteria in
certain sections of the NRPM to increase the database accuracy?
Hi
arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9
Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of
IPv4 netblocks
On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC
8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
| Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:53:59 -0400
| From: ARIN <i...@arin.net>
| To: arin-ppml@arin.net
| Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
| evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
| Message-
Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9
Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4
transfers of IPv4 netblocks
On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
"ARIN-prop-223 Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3,
and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks" as a
59 matches
Mail list logo