Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18094

Looks like this will be another great release. Thank you. Notes / thoughts: 1) I'm really happy to see the addition of trustedAuthForwarders too. With so many users getting mailing list email, this will be a big help for those lists that support this. Do you think you could do something

Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject???

ed filenames. > > Normalization is done in sub normSubject. > > http://your.assp:5/edit?file=DB-SpamfileNames=1h > > will show all normailzed filenames and the related file numbers > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> >

[Assp-test] d= DKIM validation for WL/NP Addresses

The new DKIMWLAddress / DKIMNPAddress functionality is terrific, and I greatly appreciate you implementing it at my request. It's already helped significantly when senders sign with a i= in their DKIM signature. Great stuff. I know we've been round and round on the d= only messages last week,

Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject???

point in time is > normal. Over a long time range, this feature works like expected. > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge. > net>

Re: [Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject???

the duplicate file name limit? Here's an example of one with punctuation that is there many times and is not sent to collect addresses Subject: Ringing Ears? Eat This for Breakfast & Destroy Tinnitus Fast. Anyone else seeing anything like this? On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:13 PM, K Post <

[Assp-test] maxAllowedDups not working when punctuation is in subject???

I use subject names to store messages. maxSubjectLength: 0 maxAllowedDups: 3 It's been set this exact way for years and generally seems to work. However, having just completed going through the 15,000 spam messages in /spam (that was fun, I see that some) subjects are repeated many many times.

Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck

<thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > have a look at > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/ASSP%20V2% > 20multithreading/ASSP%20V2%20module%20installation/Xpdf/ > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:&q

Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck

are attached, especially if they're large. Thomas, might there be a way to limit text scanning of PDF's to only the first X bytes of >each< attachment? Any suggestions? On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:55 PM, James Moe via Assp-test < assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 03/25/2018 0

Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature

latest RFC for DKIM is > > > *RFC* 6376 *DKIM* Signatures September 2011 > > > And don't bother me again with this! > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <as

Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature

cka...@thockar.com> wrote: > again: > > ASSP uses the DKIM signature identity > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge. > net> > Datum

Re: [Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck

Hey James - I don't see any new content in your last reply. On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 1:55 PM, James Moe via Assp-test < assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 03/23/2018 07:38 PM, K Post wrote: > > > Mar-23-18 20:10:09 Info: Loop in Worker_6 was not active for 215 seconds

[Assp-test] No processing separate corpus??

Now that we're tagging a lot of messages as no processing, I'm wondering if it might be worth considering adding the option of having a separate NotProcessed folder to the messages folder. Here's my thinking: okmail holds mail that passed the filters, but messages that are noprocess didn't

Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature

. The i= tag is only one way (of > multiple) to define a DKIM identiy > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge. > net> > Datum:24.03.2

Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature

people know that senderbase matches will be put in okay mail (not in > notspam) > > Collecting HAM is done flag (no flag, whitelisted, noprocessing) based and > like configured. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail

[Assp-test] 18065 with OCR Plugin, Workers stuck

I'm seeing stuck workers this evening. I enabled the OCR plugin a couple days ago, but this is new. I did try an Windows OS restart just to give it a fresh start, but the stuck workers are still happening. Mar-23-18 20:10:09 Info: Loop in Worker_6 was not active for 215 seconds Mar-23-18

Re: [Assp-test] local user on whitelist

Checking in on this. Just happened again because of my copy/pasting too much of an email's header. I wound up whitelisting another local address. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:39 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just went to add users from an email's header to the whitelist. I

Re: [Assp-test] No processing based on envelope

e of a bug. The '+' in the address is > not escaped in the regular expression, it is instead processed as a > quantifier. This will be fixed. > > for now you can use the following in 'noProcessing': > > test.person*caf_=them=*ourcharity@gmail.com* > <ourcharity.

Re: [Assp-test] No processing based on envelope

lt;ourcharity....@gmail.com> > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge. > net> > Datum:21.03.2018 16:47 > Betreff:[Assp-te

Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines?

er configuartion options to find them. > More smart admin may use the IP analyzer (IP-action) and copy the IP from > the .eml file to the GUI. But most times the MaillogTail is used for > problem analyzing - and there it helps alot to have the IP available (and > the link as well). > &g

[Assp-test] No processing based on envelope

I've got a handful of users who forward their personal gmail.com addresses to their account here. When this happens google forwards along with an envelope from [userpartofgmailaddress]+caf_=[userpartofASSPaddress]=[hostnameofASSPaddress]@ gmail.com For example, if someone forwarded their

Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines?

that it found a match in data is > insignificant and only causes potential confusion (as in my case). > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:20 AM, Thomas Eckardt < > *thomas.ecka...@thockar.com* <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>> wrote: > >Summary: are IP's in noDelay checked against

Re: [Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines?

re IP's in noDelay checked against just the IP that's > connecting to ASSP or does it search all of the received headers? > > Delaying is done after the 'DATA' command is received. There is no header > available at this time. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K

Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature

at 3:24 AM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > >will this actually add the other non-local addresses to the whitelist > itself based on the NotGreedyWhitelist setting? > > No. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p..

Re: [Assp-test] Archive::Libarchive::XS versions

P%20V2%20module%20installation/ > > It contains all required modules and software parts. All perl modules are > at the latest possible level. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailin

[Assp-test] NoDelay matching previous received lines?

Summary: are IP's in noDelay checked against just the IP that's connecting to ASSP or does it search all of the received headers? I've got all of Office365's IPS addresses (which I extract from their SPF) set in NoDelay so that mail sent from Office365 is never delayed. That seems to work fine.

Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF

images to text, but that's awfully processor intensive (which is why I shied away from the whole plugin for years). On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:37 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Terrific. Thank you. > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:25 AM, Thomas Eckardt < > thomas.ecka.

Re: [Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature

at 2:22 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks again for implementing this. > > Question, if I have something like > u...@domain.tld > in the DKIMWLAddresses file > -- Check out the vi

[Assp-test] New DKIM Whilelisted Addresses Feature

Thanks again for implementing this. Question, if I have something like u...@domain.tld in the DKIMWLAddresses file -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!

Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF

OS components and perl modules. > > perl -e "use File::Which 'which';" > perl -e "use File::Spec;" > perl -e "use Thread::Semaphore;" > perl -e "use PDF::OCR2;" > > > > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K

Re: [Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF

Ah, I knew there had to be a way. Is it stable on Windows? I remember from YEARS ago, many of them, all sorts of imagemagic problems on win32. On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > ASSP_OCR can do this. > > Thomas > > > &

[Assp-test] Blocking specific content in PDF

We had a bunch of pdf's with links in them slip through ASSP today. There's not much content, in the pdf, but some of it is consistent. The body of the emails pass hmm/bayes and varies from message to message. Is there a way to scan incoming PDF files for specific words and remove the attachment

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18065

This is FANTASTIC! Fantastic fantastic fantastic. I can't wait to give this a go! And I love that you extended my idea to no processing as well. I already know how I'm going to use that one! Thank you On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Hi

[Assp-test] The recent CCchangeMSGDate changes

I posted this in the change notification email, but think it may have gotten buried. >if CCchangeMSGDate is used, only the value for the seconds will be randomly changed Thank you for this!! Any chance of having that be a selectable option though? Here's the deal: 1) Sometimes when a message is

Re: [Assp-test] Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain

el and the weight is > used. The second example calls a custom sub routine in CorrectASSPcfg.pm on > match. > > In the current version, this is forbidden by assp (even perl allows it) > and per default this will be also the case in future version. But the > future version will have a

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM] Re: Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain

, bit-2 > = set IP-score to zero - default is 7 (all bits set) > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge. > ne

[Assp-test] Allow DKIM signed mail through for a domain

Lots of our external contacts use Office365. Senderbase is obviously useless for them. If a sender is whitelisted, fine, but there are often large numbers of senders in an organization (known organizations where we cannot whitelist the domain or else spammers from another server would get

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18059

>if CCchangeMSGDate is used, only the value for the seconds will be randomly changed Thank you for this!! Any chance of having that be a selectable option though? Here's the deal: 1) Sometimes when a message is erroneously rejected, I need to insure that the intended recipient sees it and it

[Assp-test] Resend mail with different date

With exchange, if I want to be able to successfully resend an email that previously had an attachment stripped, I need to let ASSP change the date. Your code works wonderfully for this. Thank you. Would it be at all possible for you to add an option in the message GUI where we can resend to

Re: [Assp-test] Problems getting Dkim signing working

Maybe try splitting the DNS record? http://hack.limbicmedia.ca/how-to-split-dns-dkim-records-properly/ On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Simply use openssl to generate a RSA key pair of the length you need. Use > the privat key in the

Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored?

e to break this previously working functionality.. And ideas? Thanks On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:04 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > okay, thanks, something else must be going on on my end. No resent mail > seems to be going through. > thanks > > On Thu, Jan 25,

Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored?

ngeMSGDate = 30: > > original Date header: > > -Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:56:27 -0500. > > new Date Header after resent: > > -Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 12:09:35 +0100 > -X-ASSP-OriginalMailDate: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:56:27 -0500 > > Thomas >

Re: [Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored?

Can you check on this for me? Still a problem. On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:13 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > 18008. I'm having trouble with resends after our upgrade. I didn't change > anytnig in CorrectASSpcfg.pm > > I have: > our $CCchangeMSGDate = 30; >

[Assp-test] local user on whitelist

I just went to add users from an email's header to the whitelist. I simply selected a block of text and pasted it into the /lists URL to let ASSP parse and add to the whitelist. In doing so, I mistakenly included our local user (u...@ourcharity.org) in the copy. No big deal, I've done this lots

Re: [Assp-test] Senderbase domains

I can't believe I did that. Thanks! On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > >\bsparkpostmail\.com->-20 > > > \bsparkpostmail\.com=>-20 > > should work > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nnt

[Assp-test] Is hidden parameter $CCchangeMSGDate still honored?

18008. I'm having trouble with resends after our upgrade. I didn't change anytnig in CorrectASSpcfg.pm I have: our $CCchangeMSGDate = 30; but when I resend now, it doesn't arrive in exchange. If I edit the date in the msg file, it does. This wasn't happening previously.

Re: [Assp-test] Attachments stripped: MS Compound File Binary

. I do know that my users get a LOT of excel files and blocking them unilaterally just isn't an option. On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:26 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > We've seen a lot of regular seeming microsoft excel (XLS) files being > blocked with AFC 4.77 with "MS Com

[Assp-test] Attachments stripped: MS Compound File Binary

We've seen a lot of regular seeming microsoft excel (XLS) files being blocked with AFC 4.77 with "MS Compound File Binary" What does compound file binary actually mean? Is that the MSOLE new switch? Thanks -- Check out

Re: [Assp-test] Senderbase domains

, but also trigger a hit if the domain matches? On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:38 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my whiteSenderBase file, I have this line: > > \bsparkpostmail\.com->-20 > > I would expect this to add a negative 20 score (subtract 20 from the >

[Assp-test] 18008 still giving okmail for replies due to MSGID Signatures

I'll be the first to admit that maybe I'm not understanding the way this is supposed to work? With 18008: Changelog says: the 'valid_Message-ID_signature' check has overwritten other whitelisting and noprocessing reasons, this caused reply mails stored outside the corpus I thought this

[Assp-test] Senderbase domains

In my whiteSenderBase file, I have this line: \bsparkpostmail\.com->-20 I would expect this to add a negative 20 score (subtract 20 from the running score) of a message if senderbase detects that a message matches SparkPostMail.com in either the hostname, the domain or the network name. I

Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam

by 'valid MSGID Sig' and - at the end of the > mail-body processing the reason for the noprocessing flag is only this > detection (no other like: noprocessing, npRe, npIP ), > the mail will be stored like any other 'whitelisted or local' mail > (NonSpamLog). > > > > Thomas >

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18008

THANK YOU Thomas. On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Hi all, > > > fixed in assp 2.6.2 *Fortress* build 18008: > > - on some systems the maillog.txt OS buffer was not flushed and so the > file tail was not readable just in time > > - the perl

Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam

admins using it - but only one of them will remember after a > year, why these stupid noprocessing mails are stored wild araound. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test

Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines

>We strip other X-ASSP lines to the outside, why not this one? > > A - the strip.. - I'll have a look. This needs to be fixed > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing

Re: [Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam

to okmail from whitelisted people? On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 12:47 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been having degraded bayesian and HMM results, lots of false > positives recently, so I'm going through some mail manually in the corpus > to do some bulk re

[Assp-test] Some whitelisted sender mail going to OKmail instead of notspam

I've been having degraded bayesian and HMM results, lots of false positives recently, so I'm going through some mail manually in the corpus to do some bulk retraining. I do this periodically and find that it helps. One thing I noticed is some mail in OkMail that comes from a whitelisted @

Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines

assing reason for the mail - the connected IP is whitelisted and this > was detected before > > The header line shows both - noprocessing and the first passing reason. > > btw.: local IP's should not be whitelisted. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:&q

Re: [Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines

passing reason for the mail > > So, this is by design and OK. > > Thomas > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge. > net> > Datum:03.01.2018 17:22 > B

[Assp-test] No processing regex through relay port, X-ASSP lines

Happy new year all! I happened to catch in an email that I sent to a gmail account which is in my no processing RE file, that when the message was received on the gmail side, the no processing X-ASSP lines hadn't been stripped. I don't know if it matters, but I send via MS Exchange through

Re: [Assp-test] Log rollovers

FYI, I've run ASSP on various Windows boxes for the last 15+ years. I've never noticed this happening, not even back in the days of Windows 2000, I have always run ASSP's service as a separate user though. I don't know if this info is particularly helpful to you, but figured I'd share. It

Re: [Assp-test] UserAttach template review request

hecked for "good". > > *@* matches every recipient and sender - and will be used, if there is not > no a more exact match found > *@* => ~~StdBlockRule > will block for all senders and recipients according to the StdBlockRule ( > if not anything better is found) > re

Re: [Assp-test] NoScan group

not work! > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" <assp-test@lists.sourceforge. > net> > Datum:31.10.2017 17:58 > Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] NoScan group >

Re: [Assp-test] NoScan group

> > > > If you added a group to the file, you need to reload the GUI one time to > get all buttons. > > > 'NoScan' is a NOGO as long as you don't produce or deal with viruses > :):):) > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <n

[Assp-test] UserAttach template review request

I'm having an issue with certain very annoying outside vendors sending pdf files with javascript in them. I need to put in exceptions for these senders, so I figured now might be a good time to implement templates in UserAttach. I'd apprecite a quick review of my plan to make sure that I've got

Re: [Assp-test] Archive::Libarchive::XS versions

Thanks. hanging tight until you give further instruction. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > Don't try this. Currently there are too many bugs in the build environment. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:

Re: [Assp-test] Archive::Libarchive::XS versions

archive::XS(libarchive-version) shows the version of the > underlying libarchive library, provided by the perl module Alien::Libarchive > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing list" &

[Assp-test] Archive::Libarchive::XS versions

What's the difference between Archive::Libarchive::XS and Archive::Libarchive::XS(libarchive-version) Looks like I've got a slightly old Archive::Libarchive::XS(libarchive-version) Clicking the CPAN link brings me here - http://search.cpan.org/search?query=Alien::Libarchive I don't see versions

Re: [Assp-test] $CCchangeMSGDate request for scenarios where Exchange is NOT detected

er > / greeting. > ## To disable this feature > completely - set this value to 16. > > > Thomas > > > > > Von:"K Post" <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:"ASSP development mailing

Re: [Assp-test] Long filenames inside zip causing SEGV from unicode/dir/pm

> sure nothing is left unaccounted for. > > > > ASSP will still have to deal with the funky filenames. > > > > Good luck. > > > > -- > > Jose Dias > > jose "dot" dias "at" DiasLan "dot" net > -

[Assp-test] $CCchangeMSGDate request for scenarios where Exchange is NOT detected

Thanks for implementing the changes in 17261 to give us more options about how to change the date. The granularity is vastly improved, but I have a big favor to ask. All of our mail first goes through another SMTP server which is NOT exchange before then being forwarded to Exchange for most users.

Re: [Assp-test] Long filenames inside zip causing SEGV from unicode/dir/pm

I also just discovered that if ASSP is restarted when these long files exist in /tmp, Strawberry Perl dies when "Checking Directories" On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:40 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > and FYI, for you windows folks, I remembered how to get rid of crazy

Re: [Assp-test] Long filenames inside zip causing SEGV from unicode/dir/pm

sorry, this is with 17244 On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:22 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm getting errors like: > > Sep-26-17 23:00:19 Warning: got unexpected signal SEGV in Worker_1: > package - Win32::Unicode::Dir, file - > c:/strawberry/perl/site/lib/Win32/U

Re: [Assp-test] Long filenames inside zip causing SEGV from unicode/dir/pm

until there's a fix or other method to stop this from happening (like telling me what config switch I have set wrong in ASSP). On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:23 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > sorry, this is with 17244 > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:22 PM, K Post <n

[Assp-test] Long filenames inside zip causing SEGV from unicode/dir/pm

I'm getting errors like: Sep-26-17 23:00:19 Warning: got unexpected signal SEGV in Worker_1: package - Win32::Unicode::Dir, file - c:/strawberry/perl/site/lib/Win32/Unicode/Dir.pm, line - 80! Sep-26-17 23:00:29 Warning: try to terminate inactive/stuck Worker_1 Sep-26-17 23:00:29 msg81131-14259

Re: [Assp-test] ForceResend blocked PDF

eader on CC.. ForwardSpam and resend - > MS-Exchange may require this,* > *because duplicate mails may removed silently* > > > > > > > Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> &

Re: [Assp-test] ForceResend blocked PDF

vent this behavior > in windows!!) > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:15.09.2017 21:04 > Betreff:[Assp-test] ForceResend bloc

[Assp-test] ForceResend blocked PDF

I have a user who received an email that had a blocked PDF because of a link in it. The (external) user who created the PDF erroneously has a link in it to file:///C:/Users/Michele/Dropbox/Corresponding%20Secretary/Eblasts%202017%202018/ www.an-outside-domain.com/calendar when she meant to do

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17254

excellent. thanks On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Hi all, > > fixed in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17254: > > changed: > > - attachment blocking: > - If a file extension regular expression is wrong defined as (1) '*' > (leading asterix)

Re: [Assp-test] Questions on new UserAttach functionality, strategy in lieu of using Level defined Attachment Blocking

n.com is the first match > > for bfulln...@1.any-domain.com - * is the first match > > > In the example tree above, the entry 'NoExcel@*' may be removed - there > is no such email address, that will reach and match this entry. > > > Thomas > > > > > > >

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17247

ided the levels for some more > time, to make an upgrade to V2 more easy. > > Thomas > > > > > > > Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17247

Nice work! Your detailed descriptions will be quite helpful to many - especially me when occasionally having to remember exactly the order that things are processed. Thank you. I worry a little bit about the choice to use -+ as a switch. How about changing that to --- (3 dashes) or -_- or

Re: [Assp-test] AUTHerrors.sav access at startup

I'm toying with ditching the ramdisk idea at this point based on what you've said, but why after updating to 17244 to I get the warning about AUTHerrors.sav (and only that file) at initial startup after a reboot when I never did before? Related, is there any logic to leaving the tmpDB structure

[Assp-test] AUTHerrors.sav access at startup

When ASSP 17244 starts up, after a restart of the system, I get: Warning: can't open file 'c:/assp/tmpDB/files/AUTHErrors.sav' to load hash (in loadHashFromFile) Note that tempDB is a windows shortcut to a folder on a ramdisk. It was suggested long ago that I use a ramdisk to improve

Re: [Assp-test] Service hangs post 17244

Ah ha! Would you look at that, documented and all right there in the GUI! I've made the change. Keeping fingers crossed. Thank you. On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com> wrote: > check that 'IOEngine' is set to IO::select > > Thomas > &

[Assp-test] Service hangs post 17244

Since upgrading to 17244 and Strawberry perl (from your sourceforge download), twice ASSP seems to have hung. The service seems to be running. Using between 6 and 10% of processor and about 900MB of ram (both normal), however I cannot connect to SMTP nor the webui. The maillog (looking at the

[Assp-test] UserAttach wildcard rules triggering error

ASSP 17244 and AFC 4.60 This version combination is writing an error to the log when wildcard rules are matched. I've got a couple rules with a * wildcard file types. For example specialu...@domain.com => good => *(this user can get and send any attachment type) and

[Assp-test] Intended For Lines

The description of AddIntendedFor (since 17158) includes the line: The "X-Assp-Intended-For:" header will not be added for Blind Carbon Copy (BCC:) addresses in outgoing mails, to keep them hidden from external readers. BCC addresses are those listed in the BCC: header and - those that are

[Assp-test] Encrypted Zip Warning/Error

I just spun up a new installation of ASSP 17244 using Strawberry Perl 5.26 on windows. I ran install.cmd from the latest assp.mod.zip. everything installed except for Alien::Libarchive/0.27 Archive::Libarchive::XS/0.0901 I don't know why they failed. I manually downloaded these two modules

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortess* build 17244

It's time for me to get new glasses apparently!!! Fortress!! On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:05 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, then I've got to ask, what does "Fortess" mean? I'm assuming that's > German for "Fortress?" > > And short of just dis

[Assp-test] HTMLParser

It's good to see this option in the GUI! 2 things: 1) In my opinion, the option "buildin" should instead be "Built In" 2) the infostats page doesn't seem to show HTML::Strip or HTML::TreeBuilder -- Check out the vibrant

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 build 17243

s encryped zip files from and to this software vendor support > address - even this is not allowed for the envelope recipient per rule. > This can be done separately or in addition to the already working > > i...@sender-domain.com=>block-in=>:JSPDF > zip:i...@sender-domain.com=>

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortess* build 17244

ckar.com> wrote: > Its there for years now, but was rarly used. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum:02.09.2017 02:00 >

Re: [Assp-test] Windows ActiveState Perl 5.24

l modules except the NetSNMP::: are available at Strawberry Perl up > to 5.26. > Perl 5.26 is no longer experimental. > I no longer use Active Perl. > > Thomas > > > > > > Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> > An:ASSP development mai

[Assp-test] Windows ActiveState Perl 5.24

About a year ago, Thomas wrote: > > There are many modules not available for Perl 5.22 and 5.24 on windows. > All missing modules are available at the packages repository at > sourceforge. > ActiveState Perl 5.22 and 5.24 will be not useable. But StrawberryPerl can > be used, because the gcc and

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 *Fortess* build 17244

What's the purpose of the codename variable? On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Thomas Eckardt wrote: > Hi all, > > fixed in assp 2.5.6 *Fortress* build 17244: > > - a domain name in an URL that starts with number and dash like "2017-", > was wrong detected as strong

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 build 17243

ah, sorry, that was in 17244. On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:52 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, I think you missed that HTMLParser is now a configuration parameter. > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:37 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 build 17243

Also, I think you missed that HTMLParser is now a configuration parameter. On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:37 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > You sure do work fast! Questions and commends on the UserAttach > functionality: > > 1) You had previously mentioned inheritanc

Re: [Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.5.6 build 17243

You sure do work fast! Questions and commends on the UserAttach functionality: 1) You had previously mentioned inheritance, but I don't see reference to that here. That's fine, but say you've got something like *@Domain.com=>block=>~~commonRule specificu...@domain.com=>block=>doc I know you

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

y to skip inheritance will work > > ~Templates can only contain extension sets (exe\-bin|doc|.and 50 > other types) NOT policy sets > > This is the only way to get clear rules and processing. Otherwise it would > be (for example) possible to define policy set loops. > > &

Re: [Assp-test] More PDF Javascript catches

ection NOT matches a defined block rule > AND >the mail and flow direction matches a defined good rule > > > > >And then what happens with inheritance if an inherited policy has a > block only, line that inherits that has a good, etc. > > What a question ?? It ha

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >