To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Stat.pl needs updating?
Hill, Brett wrote:
Or does nobody use this anymore?
I'll try to get it updated before the next stable release.
I'm running ASSP 1.3.2(52) on my Windows server.
You might want to grab
Doug wrote:
And those who have the necessary tools to convert a txt file to a Perl
program.
Too funny :-)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now
Fritz.. I'm not running ASSP in scoring mode (at least not for all
the checks); one thing I can say.. I did NOT have that CPU issue with
previous version (only saw it for the clamd scanning) but I do NOT use
PB .. now, I dunno if this may be related but maybe you could have a
look at the PB code
I'm not sure I completely understand what you're saying, but I've had
almost half of mine come through with no body (until today...they must
have found new IP's to send from). And the spam reason (for the emails
without bodies) has almost always been:
X-Assp-Score: 100 (DNSBL-failed)
Assuming
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
If you only want to not collect certain messages - then use a Redlist
function to match against something in the message. Redlisted messages
do not get added to the Bayesian corpus.
Ok, I added your lines to my redre.txt file. I made sure that it's
being used under
Espinola Jr
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:31 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Latest greeting card spam
Hill, Brett wrote:
Is there a way to keep ASSP from collecting these messages and
corrupting the spam corpus besides setting DNSBL
If this type of spam is listed in the bombre.txt file and I've tried
using DoBombRE in mode 1 and 3, why does ASSP still catch and store
these emails? I am also using PB mode 3 for several things, but not all
of them.
ASSP is catching the emails under a DNSBL problem vs. a Bombre one. I
would
] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:19 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Latest greeting card spam
Hill, Brett wrote:
If this type of spam is listed in the bombre.txt file and I've tried
using DoBombRE in mode 1 and 3, why does
Graziano said:
What version are you running ?
1.3.3.2 (what was final)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration
Hill, Brett wrote:
The subjects didn't look too dangerous too me. Here's mine.
I'm nothing of an expression writer. Just used the examples we already
have:
(Funny|Greeting|Holiday|Movie-quality|Musical|Thank.You).(postcard|e-car
d|ecard|card|Card|)
Well, that's what I
I'm using Fritz's pre-populated bombre.txt and redre.txt. They're
configured to be used in ASSP. For the life of me, they don't work.
I look in the log and I almost never see Bomb Regex entries. I never
see Red Regex entries. I've added all of these Regular Expressions, but
ASSP never uses
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hill,
Brett
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 3:46 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] BOMBRE and REDRE not doing anything for me
As you can see, BombRaw is seeing the expression, but at what point does
RedRe?
Here's what
Yeah, that's probably because Doug asked me to send the message so he
could help me diagnose my problem. I should have changed part of it so
it wouldn't have been caught...my bad.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Tuesday,
I did join the list Monday the 13th when I first saw your email about
the new list (I don't make it a habit to check my work emails on
Saturdays).
So far, the only thing I've seen come across that email list is:
testing 1-2-3 (from Micheal Espinola Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED])
And as far as I'm
Does anyone know of any issues with version .61 like there were with
.59?
In the meantime, I'm giving it a spin.
Brett
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?
That is awesome!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti
Haack
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 5:15 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Creative spam
If I would be a spammer, I would
Have you tried making ASSP listen on different Ports? From what I see, It
looks like another version of ASSP is running.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Florian Krueger
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 8:26 AM
To: 'Questions and Answers
Have you looked in your BombRe file for casino? It's in mine.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian
Rehkopf
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 11:21 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Assp-user] False Positive
My spam folder still needs to fill up with files (about 2500 more).
What do I put in Files Distribution to give the files a higher number
instead of it overwriting existing emails (it's taking forever to fill
my spam folder up)?
Regards,
Brett
We've moved on to bigger and better. Try 1.3.4 at
(http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/S05F324B2?WasRead=1)
But, If you want to run development versions you must join:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With subscribe in the body
or go to:
Just make up a domain name (that doesn't exist). Add it to your Local
domains line under the Relaying section in ASSP. Your Exchange server
will know it's not local and will send it out just like any other email.
ASSP will pick it up knowing that it's a local domain. ASSP will take
care of it
, September 12, 2007 3:57 PM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Install Experiences?
ok
sorry
I wouldnt have thought non-exchange local domain would mean putting an
entry in local domains. silly me.
like spam.com?
Hill, Brett wrote:
Just make up a domain name
No matter what domain you decide to use, it has to be listed in Local
Domains. That way ASSP knows to pick it up when the keywords are used
(ie. Asspspam, asspnotspam, asspwhite, asspnotwhite).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bytehd
Sent:
I'm using Exchange 2003 SP2 with ASSP successfully. Remind me what your
setup is and I can help you straighten it out if you like.
Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bytehd
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 10:23 PM
To:
Anyone else seeing this new spam variant? Any ideas how to fight it.
Far as I can tell, RBL checks are catching most of them, but some manage
to get through. They look to be 4 lines long and they're in html
format. Also, none of them seem to be alike. Seems like they all start
out with a
From your remarks lately, it seems like you've been *schdoinking* the
attitude bucket as well.
Get over it. Play nice :-).
...Yo!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles
Marcus
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 6:33 AM
To: Questions
I've had problems with CCSpam in previous versions, but Fritz fixed it.
Since then, I've not really noticed any partial copies in my own CCSpam.
Fritz, you mentioned that the ccSpam feature was never intended for
copying the full message. But, I think it is something that several
people
Perhaps it was. I can't remember not ever getting the whole copy
though. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:18 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Do you have Only users with a local domain in mailfrom contribute to
the whitelist. checked in the Whitelisting section?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Bahrami
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 12:32 AM
To: Questions and
It's been known for a good while now that Net::DNS 0.59 has had
problems.
http://www.asspsmtp.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Common_Problems
I've been using Net::DNS 0.61 for some months now without any problems
though.
Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Put it in Bayesian Testmode. Add a Prepend Spam Subject such as
[SPAM].
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roberto
Pereyra
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 8:47 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] assp filters
I believe that was only a problem on Windows OS's not Linux. But
upgrading to .61 would be good in any case. It's stable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Houlbrooke
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 9:15 AM
To: Questions and Answers
I'm using the original bombre.txt (pretty much the stock version) file
before the smaller one was put up on Fritz's website. For the life of
me, I can't find 'Penalties' in this file. An email was getting caught
up and the log said (BombRaw: 'Penalties'). Chance anyone knows which
one this is?
Thanks for the info! It makes sense now. I'll put that in. I was
unable to compare in the mail analyzer because the message was redlisted
because of Regex:Red 'Mailer-Daemon'.
Out of curiosity, are regex's case sensitive?
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it's any consolation, my nightime spam emails went from 1200 to 45-78
for the past 4-5 days. [Knock on wood] They're probably taking a break
on me right now, and instead giving you a hard time...lol!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
That's right. I run mine twice a day. Takes 12-15 mins each time for
my build.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti
Haack
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:22 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Besides what the others have said, my first guess would be that you have
one, some or all of the options DNS, URIBL, SPF, or PTR validation for
whitelisted users turned on. But again turn the logging on to check.
There are some really agressive DNSBL providers out there blocking bulk
lists and
If you're on Windows (and the ActiveState Perl Package Manager doesn't
have what you need), I use CPAN to download the packages and then use
nmake.exe to compile...takes a few seconds to compile. The directions
to compile and install are almost always included with the downloads in
a readme file.
Dave,
Try using the ASSP Toolbar (If you use Outlook 2000+). It will allow
you to select multiple messages at once and it will forward them as
individual emails to ASSP. If you have Active Directory, you can also
globally configure all of the settings in the toolbar so individuals
don't have
X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 20 (not valid HELO: 'welcome')
X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 20 (invalid HELO: 'welcome')
Don't these both mean the same thing? They're both from the same email.
Should the first line have a different description?
Brett
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Scoring Question
Paul Houlbrooke wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/ValidHelo---InvalidHelo-t4231847.html
Hill, Brett wrote:
X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 20 (not valid HELO: 'welcome')
X-Assp-Message/IP-Score: 20 (invalid HELO: 'welcome')
Don't these both mean the same thing
You should try using the CC Messages - Copy Spam and Send to this
Address feature. It will (99% of the time) leave you a copy of the
email that you can play with in a separate mail account (ie. forward to
the notspam or spam ASSP addresses / whitelist or de-whitelist etc...)
Brett
-Original
There are other settings for that called Non Spam Collection Frequency
and Spam Collection Frequency.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micheal
Espinola Jr
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 1:53 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of
Your best bet, if you want to move anything, would be to move the files
from the spam folder to the notspam folder and vice-versa (and then run
the move2num utility [assuming you're using the subject as filenames]
and rebuildspamdb utility after you're done with that). You should only
really have
Do you have an example header?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L.
Thomson Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 11:53 AM
To: assp-user
Subject: [Assp-user] Email with spam prob 0.000 rejected as spam
I have been dealing with some
You only want to install 1 of those, not both. Use Net::Syslog if
you're using Windows. Use Sys::Syslog if you're running a flavor or
Unix or Linux.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk
Kulmsee
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Think outside the box guys.
Up until this point, ASSP has not had the ability to use another DNS
system because that feature was not built into it. How many years has
everyone been using this with their own DNS and not complained about it
(besides the occasional misconfigured DNS system someone
Ever consider renaming the sensitive info (ie: email addresses, IP info,
etc) in the header information? That's what I do when I post headers to
the forum.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William L.
Thomson Jr.
Sent: Monday,
What is the difference in functionality between:
1=Block and 2=Monitor/ing
Thanks,
Brett
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is
Monitoring will just add an event in the log indicating if the test
were in blocking it would have been blocked.
Ahh ok, thanks!
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell. From
William said:
That is spam directly from notspam folder. Less the email body which
was truncated due to the 10k limit. I am considering setting up a spam
drop email account and wading through that. But don't see the headers
being any different. Other than additional stuff to get the spam to my
Go here: http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/S05F324B2?WasRead=1
Download the zip file at the bottom of the list.
Fritz put it out there per your request since you needed a .zip file.
The URL is included (and has been included for a long time) in ASSP on
the Info and Stats page. Click Core
Says who?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti
Haack
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 9:01 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] OT Bottom posting context replies
Your Signature
My point is (even if it is a netiquette), How many people do you know in
the business world (that have email) that start their signatures with
-- ? (even less for people that stay at home on their computers)
Of all the people I know that do that, I can probably count them on 1
hand. (Not to say
Whats the problem?
My pffft was with Your Signature should alway start with -- , not
with Why can't email clients at least strip signatures in the quoted
content automatically
No one was saying that everyone used it, or even SHOULD use it (I wish
they would, but thats irrelevant)
An official
Unless you're having Bayesian problems I would just keep what you have.
Otherwise, keep your whitelist/redlist and start over with spam and
notspam.
Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GrayHat
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007
Um don't confuse this project with others. This project has had an
EXCELLENT reputation for stability. Not to mention from my use and
experience in the last 1205.055 days of running ASSP, mostly a bug free
history as well.
In the last email, all you complained about was that there was no
And I am NOT the only one effected or having problems.
Working great here! (Since v1.0.12)
If this were a money thing, no way. Work so far would hardly justify
the contract in the first place.
I really have to disagree. He has done an excellent job adding new
functionality and keeping us
Maybe an option to then remove that person from the whitelist. Also,
an option to attach the messages in question to the mail so they can be
reviewed as needed. That would be helpful for them, so when they see
they sent a message Enlarge your member!, they know there is something
wrong on
From: samaneh yousefnezhad
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 2:52 AM
To: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Assp-user Digest, Vol 20, Issue 23
Assp-user Digest? Your point?
-
SF.Net email is
Anyone here have a front-end / back-end Exchange 2003 setup with a relay
host for outbound messages? Everything is working for me except that
(from the Exchange front-end) my Public Folder sync replies back to my
back-end Exchange are hung in ASSP till the connection times out. My
outbound port
I have encountered some different suggestions on maintain the
errors/spam/notspam directories of email. Given the sensitive nature of
the mail in these, how does one deal with purging this? Is it ok to
purge them once you run the rebuild Perl script?
The rebuildspamdb perl script uses those
Grayhat said:
(it would be cool having a script to export/import the white/red lists
;D)
Out of curiosity, why can't you just copy the files (whitelist/redlist)
from old to new?
Brett
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net
the machine using this setup is the one I use for testing new versions
of ASSP, it serves a LAN and... well, sometimes the lusers may see some
glitches, but.. what the heck g :) I've other machines around running
ASSP on a separate box btw, but before screwing those I try to
experiment in a
Is there a defined upgrade path from the antediluvian version (1.0.9)
that I'm running to the latest? I had a copy of 1.2.4 which stated that
I could only upgrade from 1.1.1 (?) or later. So I guess the upgrade
procedure is likely to be multi-staged. Are all relevant versions
available in an
Is there a defined upgrade path from the antediluvian version (1.0.9)
that I'm running to the latest? I had a copy of 1.2.4 which stated that
I could only upgrade from 1.1.1 (?) or later. So I guess the upgrade
procedure is likely to be multi-staged. Are all relevant versions
available in an
Im not sure what people use for a FW.
Watchguard Firebox X1000
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
Watchguard iptables?
I guess I don't understand what you mean?
Brett
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Is there a way to see which words triggered the bayesian spam tag in
an email?
I see that an email message is tagged as spam and that it is because
of the bayesian words in it.
But I want to see which words triggered ASSP..
Have you tried using the Analyzer in ASSP? Copy the header/body of
in case of problems, setup the ASSP box to have two IPs, the first
one will be the one on which ASSP will receive external emails (on its
main port); the second one will be the one to use to bind the second
listen port and which exchange will use as a smarthost to deliver
external emails
The
X-Assp-Score: 20 (ValidHelo)
X-Assp-Score: 20 (InvalidHelo)
X-Assp-Score: 20 (PTRinvalid)
X-Assp-Spam-Level:
X-Assp-Tag: MessageLimit
X-Assp-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Assp-Version: 1.3.3.8()
X-Assp-Spam: YES
X-Assp-ID:
X-Assp-Spam-Reason: Message Limit
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Is it possible, to send text-mails to a mailing-list?
(!!Naively asking a question!!) Help me understand why a plain text
email is so much better than an html one? Is it because your mail
client doesn't view HTML? I've always been of the opinion that HTML
emails look
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
I don't know if I'd call it a trend, but its certainly a
carry-over from the days of keeping everything as
simple/small as possible because of crappy MUA's and limited
capacity on MTA's.
For some I think its a long-standing preference, and for
others I
I'm using Penalty scoring. Recently, I changed bayesian to Score from
Block because of some legit emails that were getting blocked from
bayesian detection. I thought this might be a better solution, but I've
been running into a lot of emails that are scoring bayesian 100% , but
the Senderbase
ASSP Proxy Uptime:1582 days 20 hours 6 mins
Messages Processed:31032613 (19605.7 per day)
Non-Local Mail Blocked:79.8%
CPU Usage: 51.98% avg
Concurrent SMTP Sessions: 171 max
since reset at Wed Feb 4 17:33:10 2004
You all have never had to reboot your machines?
Uptime doesn't reset when you reboot or upgrade.
Ahh, for whatever reason, I was thinking of the Current Uptime stat.
My longtime stats are as follows. It would be longer, but there was a
time when we were told to delete our existing stats file so that it
would be compatible with a newer
I am interested - who has the longest uptime for their ASSP stats?
Mine: (since reset)
ASSP Proxy Uptime: 432.749 days
Messages Processed: 657149 (1518.5 per day)
Non-Local Mail Blocked: 89.7%
Looks like the original poster did specify Since Reset despite the
uptime wording.
So, how about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Houlbrooke
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:54 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Note: DSBL offline
GrayHat wrote:
This note is
Maxime Frenette wrote:
We are doing some change over our exchange server and need to
stop the LDAP verification. Unfortunately, when I disable the
verification, all of my e-mails are being rejected as 550
5.1.1 User unknown.
Assp version : ASSP http://www.asspsmtp.org/scripts/stats/
Paul Houlbrooke wrote:
I thought ASSP would use the SMTP server if there was no flat
file or LDAP?
True. I forgot that when my ldap isn't working, it skips the check (but
it also tells you in the log that it is skipping the check). I'm using
1.4.1 currently. I can't remember if that was the
I have downloaded 5.10.0.1003 in the hope that this will get
around the problem but it won't install over the top of the
existing installation.
That version is not compatible yet with the ASSP requirements. Several
have tested it and it lacks certain perl modules needed in ASSP (as far
as
I think, that is a rumour (unverified).
fritz
I was only going off of a few posts back in April. Even Kevin said not
to go to 5.10. At one point in time, your website even said not to
install 5.10.
At any rate =), if it's ok to use now, I guess it's ok to use!
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Alex Davidson wrote:
Is there a way to hide it or should I just get over myself? :)
Did you disable Allow service to interact with desktop in the service
properties?
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your
Are you letting ASSP manage your spam/notspam folders? If not, you should be.
The default amount of emails to keep is maxfiles=14000. That means up to 14000
per each folder. You should at least try and even out your notspam folder with
your spam folder. That will help you save time on the
I still don't think you get the Big picture.
Here's what you need to do:
1. Disable Use Subject as Maillog Names.
2. Set MaxFiles to 14000 (or 2 if you really feel you need it).
3. Set MaxBytes to 4000.
4. Schedule Rebuildspamdb.pl to run.
MaxFiles=the amount of emails stored in each
ASSP will fill the folders up to the MaxFiles limit. After that, it will begin
to randomly replace emails in the folders (not from the oldest). Your
spam/notspam directories never empty once they've reached the MaxFiles limit
(unless you delete them yourself or you get a whole bunch that are
Charles Marcus wrote:
Your T-1 goes down for 3+ days at a time?? Man, I think I'd
have to fire them quick.
My smtp server is setup to try for 24 hours. After that it fails. My
endusers demand a 1 day turn around. They don't want to be sitting
around for 3 days waiting to find out an
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Mine is much lower than that. If a message didn't go through
- but users need to know about it.
Let me clarify. By saying 24 hours, I meant that it retries 12 times
(once every 15 mins), then there is a temporary fail message sent to the
enduser. Finally, it then
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
FWIW:
First retry: 5 min.
Second retry: 10 min.
Third retry: 15 min.
Subsequent retries: 30 min.
Delay notification: 1 hour
Expiration: 1 day
Thanks for the detail. I think I'll adopt the same retry strategy.
Getting back to the original discussion:
And
Resent: Didn't see it show up on list.
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
FWIW:
First retry: 5 min.
Second retry: 10 min.
Third retry: 15 min.
Subsequent retries: 30 min.
Delay notification: 1 hour
Expiration: 1 day
Thanks for the detail. I think I'll adopt the same retry strategy.
Getting
Dan M. Morgan wrote:
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 12:41 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user] Request for help blocking a particular
type of spam
Hello to the list,
I have a user whose inbox I have been monitoring for a couple
of
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 1:45 PM
To: ASSP User List
Subject: [Assp-user] rebuildspamdb.pl script running for donkeys' ages
Hello people,
I have an issue with an ASSP v1.2.6 on a Pentium Celeron box
There's your problem =). There's a lot going on during a
Nicole Hähnel wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to update my assp to the newest 1.4.1 version.
ASSP 1.4.1.zip contains all necessary files without assp.pl itself.
Ok, but where can I find assp.pl?
Thanks!
Nicole
It appears it has been removed from the site. It is normally in the list of
5th link on the page you posted a link for.
http://www.magicvillage.de/~Fritz_Borgstedt/assp/S0615ADC0?WasRead=1
Kind Regards,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Spyros Tsiolis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 12:43 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of
Have you tried the latest version 1.4.3.0.111614?
Kind Regards,
Brett
From: Barry Bahrami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 1:44 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP
Proxy'
You can get it here:
http://www.iworld.de/homes/fb/ASSP/S064ACFE3?WasRead=1
From: Barry Bahrami [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:47 PM
To: 'Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP
Proxy'
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
I wouldn't do that if I were you. I believe you think of
calender functionality. This is not part of the smtp
protocol, but just a microsoft addition to exchange. You can
accomplish calenders in many other ways. Such as plugins on
the client, confluence's calender
I think that is just an acknowledgement that it had been previously
delayed. And as a result, it is not delayed after that because that's
how delaying works. So, yes, it should have been successful.
-Original Message-
From: Wim Borghs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
I can only assume he was including the cost of the server hardware (which can
cost a bit depending on how many users you have), but that cost also applies to
any email server software chosen.
I agree on the Smartphone part...big plus! I also use ASSP and Exchange 2003
in my environment.
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
You have imap for that you know. :-)
Why would I use IMAP on my mobile phones when an OWA server is so much
more efficient (not to mention secure...SSL)?
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
