onal *SRTP*. If a device requests SRTP
and it's not possible, the call will fail.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com
ejabberd
The XMPP support is not tuned for Google Talk by any means, and the
voice part (chan_motif) supports the two Google derivatives and the
actual Jingle spec.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at
ge in the situation. The asterisk.org Debian
packages have not been updated. The debian.org packages are done by
others, so I can't speak on that.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.
erminated
your access.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provide
sean darcy wrote:
I have a call on gv over motif. I try to bridge it to another call over
motif, but a different gv account, and I get congestion.
motif only handles one 1 channel at a time??
Motif itself has no imposed limitations, but that's not to say Google
Voice doesn't.
Matthew J. Roth wrote:
Joshua Colp wrote:
If you set nat=no for that specific peer it should work as you need.
'rport' is forced on these days which works for most situations, except
with some platforms and Cisco phones.>_>
Joshua,
That sounds much easier than what I came
rced on these days which works for most situations, except
with some platforms and Cisco phones. >_>
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at:
l)
Call-ID: 705605f129adbf5a38b5a0ff72de8f39@70.10.163.44:5060
<http://705605f129adbf5a38b5a0ff72de8f39@70.10.163.44:5060/>.
The call id was changed twice Could this be a two part problem?
Yes. Until you can isolate it more it's all just a guess but it still
doesn't seem lik
races also illustrate
this, the BYE in the trace is from a completely different call than the
other messages. (You can see by looking at the Call-ID).
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digiu
user agent. Each leg is individual.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth
Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 01/04/13 22:06, Joshua Colp wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote:
Thanks for the fast reply. I agree backporting full support for AVPF
would not be justified for many use cases (including my own). What I
was more curious about is whether the F can be tolerated (in other
words
VP or SAVP."
and whether such behavior is possible even without setting avpf=yes on a
per-peer basis?
This is fine for incoming but what about outgoing to a device?
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check
owledge of AVPF, and since it's a new
feature it was only added to Asterisk 11. You could try to backport the
changes but chan_sip has changed quite a bit, so it could be rough.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check u
d the only option to make it go further is to use a hardware
transcoding solution.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com
f Asterisk
seems to clear it up for another day or so. Has anyone else noticed this?
This is fixed in Asterisk 11.3.0-rc1. The Google XMPP server has become
prone to disconnecting as of late, which triggers a bug in older
versions where chan_motif ignores XMPP traffic.
--
Joshua Colp
D
=> n(email),System(/usr/local/bin/emailme)
same => n,Answer() ; also tried without this
same => n,Hangup()
You need to Answer, Wait, send a DTMF of 1, wait a bit more, and then
hang up.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW -
7;t specified anything to call. You need to specify both an
endpoint and a target to call.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digiu
f the Google Talk XMPP server. No incoming connections occur.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
--
s
nothing that can be done to force them to.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandw
/display/AST/Calling+using+Google
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Coloca
and loaded. You can load it
explicitly using "module load app_senddtmf.so". If that fails then it
was not built and you will have to look into why not.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out
terisk dialplan with a combination of Answer, Wait, and
SendDTMF(1)
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 14/01/13 23:31, Joshua Colp wrote:
Daniel Pocock wrote:
I've set up a peer to use G.722 only and tried to make it talk to an
Asterisk box
Asterisk always rejects the call with the following error:
chan_gtalk was written to only support a limited number of codecs
does not have this
limitation.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation
Roy Abshire wrote:
What is the quickest way to apply this patch?
The quickest way is to probably just grab res_xmpp.c from
http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/11/res/res_xmpp.c - replace
the existing res_xmpp.c in your code with it - recompile - and install.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium
?r1=378411&r2=378917&view=patch
and apply it against your Asterisk 11 source code.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.
Roy Abshire wrote:
Could this be why incoming calls to voice do not ring asterisk
extensions too?
When the issue occurs, yes.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk
Joshua Colp wrote:
Kai-Uwe Jensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Roy Abshire mailto:r...@coopvr.com>> wrote:
I have the transport=google-v1 too but restarting Asterisk always
solves my problem for a day...so how do you know that fixed it?
I don't.
If any of you can
ebug like I previously mentioned then I
can see pretty quickly where the problem lies (chan_motif or Google Voice).
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & w
curs hang up and run "xmpp set debug off". Copy the contents of the
console to a file and put it somewhere for viewing.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.
k fixes it only for a day.
Without seeing an XMPP debug with the Jingle signaling it's impossible
to really investigate this. I will say I haven't heard of this happening
though from anyone else.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsv
in the configuration.
I would suggest you follow
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+WebRTC+Support since
there may be other things you have missed.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out
ence
bridge you can use ChanSpy to spy on a channel. It will provide a mixed
stream of the incoming and outgoing part of the channel. So essentially
use Originate to call your 3rd leg and then have it execute ChanSpy with
the correct criteria to get to the right leg.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
D
Jonas Kellens wrote:
On 09-12-12 19:49, Joshua Colp wrote:
As well - if the log you provided has not been altered then you are
attempting to add an interface "member3" to the queue. While this will
succeed it is ultimately not a valid interface and would not be
considered as avail
stable, it's
just a candidate for release put out there for testing. It helps to
uncover issues.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
provide some
further insight.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Coloc
. On a functioning system audio is generally received every
20ms, or higher if packetization permits it. This could be a NAT problem
or something else.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com
o from the log you have provided thus far, I
think you may have a phone specific issue.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & ww
? The only
thing that is remotely coming to mind is the SDK for the Digium Phones.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.ast
How is the call from your PSTN phone being delivered into Asterisk?
If coming in over SIP the configuration may be incorrect.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.
Jean-Denis Girard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 26/11/2012 04:26, Joshua Colp a écrit :
To others using chan_motif - are you experiencing the same issue?
I didn't use chan_motif since testing a few weeks ago, so I may I have
broke my configuration, but Google
little bit and caused the problem you heard (or didn't
hear, hehe). If you still want to allow GSM you can try moving the
allow=gsm to below allow=ulaw. This should change the priority.
Glad it seems to be working for you now, though!
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Sof
th phones and the desktop were in the same room).
Few suggestions:
1. Remove allow=gsm from your sip.conf and reload
2. Disable ZRTP in Jitsi by going into Options -> Accounts -> Selecting
account -> Edit -> Security -> Uncheck "Enable support to encrypt calls".
S
rk
topology in mind. That way a clearer picture of where it's saying media
should go to, where it's sending media from, etc can be gleamed. Once
that is figured out then the problem can be isolated.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Hunts
;SIP
or DAHDI->SIP (and directmedia is off).
Yeah this is so weird that packet captures are really needed. A working
call and a non-working call, along with what IP ranges are what.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
C
ulaw
allow=g729
allow=h264
What NAT settings are globally in use? Do you have directmedia turned
off or on?
This really does indeed feel like a weird NAT issue that is probably
configuration related (probably both in Jitsi and Asterisk).
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Develope
isr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
If were on this subject I'll throw in my question
Does named acl lists in asterisk 11 help for this or only for registrations?
ACLs don't control SIP peer matching, so no.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW -
d not recommend that as
it can pose a security risk.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.ast
e sure the
session initiation is proper. I'll see if I can reproduce this over the
next few days in my spare time.
To others using chan_motif - are you experiencing the same issue?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806
Chris Datfung wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Joshua Colp mailto:jc...@digium.com>> wrote:
I'm trying to get Incoming Google Voice calls to ring on my
Iaxy. I'm
using Asterisk 11.0.1. Based on the the following configurations can
someon
ed at any time.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provide
and
have it pass through a jitterbuffer (which by definition of being a
buffer introduces delay).
How much of a delay are you hearing?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out
s silent when it's called from something
on the other side of a PRI via DAHDI.
What's the configuration like for Jitsi in sip.conf? What version of
Asterisk? What does the SIP signaling look like?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW
fully load? If it didn't it would not attach
itself to your Google account, so incoming session creation attempts
would be ignored.
Are there additional parts to your configuration files?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville,
e now seeing above is actually the
internal "table cost" for choosing. I can certainly agree that this is
not ideal. The subject has been brought up a few times but nobody has
tackled making it reflect computational costs once again.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Softwar
"IAX trunk drops"?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Coloc
ar to have been smooth. Would you be willing to
provide the information I asked about from a running 11 instance?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com &am
houldn't happen but it would be useful to know exactly
what you are doing with the system. Answering my questions above is a
good start.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com
devices.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
ody has
responded to you until now. If you can provide that information I'm sure
we can all help to determine if there really is an issue at work here!
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL
post a short snippet of a phone calling
another and the bridge that occurs I could be more certain.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out
nce bridge first. This is what Page essentially does, with the
difference being that only the channel executing Page() can talk. If
that behavior is what you are trying to accomplish I suggest you use
that instead.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Dr
peers are registering to that queue.
is that the right path, or am i barking the wrong tree?
Is there any particular reason you don't want to do this or is it just
because you get the "Unable to create channel" message? There's nothing
really *wrong* with that message in y
172.16.10.1-172.16.10.255 range.
For cases where you may want to configure this in one place and share it
around Asterisk 11 has introduced what are called "Named ACLs".
You can find further information on those at
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Named+ACLs
Cheers,
--
J
ng way but
are still in a great state of flux. It's early for WebRTC.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com &am
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Joshua Colp [2012.11.07.1831 +0100]:
Peer names have to be distinct, this is just a fundamental design
element of chan_sip. What a lot of people end up doing is instead of
treating peers as people they treat them as devices. The peer name
becomes the MAC
er at sip.conf.sample - specifically the SIP DOMAIN SUPPORT
section and you'll see what I mean.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & ww
dentity:
Public Identity: sip:@of Asterisk>
Password:
Realm:
In the future please send emails of this type to the asterisk-users
mailing list so that everyone can see the conversation and learn. I've
copied my reply to it.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Sof
an issue within Asterisk. This is a problem with the SIP
destination you are dialing. Something is not configured properly with
it or it is experiencing issues.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at:
t,
and Google Talk/Google Voice don't use ICE-UDP candidates.
Sorry for the inconvenience!
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
___
problem knowing what Google Talk Login to use?
There's nothing explicit to prevent you from doing this but Google
decides what client gets incoming calls, so it may go to your desktop
when you don't want it to.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis
ng stands out immediately.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provid
dd icesupport=yes. I use my own rtp
port range that is opened on the firewall.
Yes, this is indeed a requirement.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www
ported branches (1.8, 10, and trunk).
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-commits/2012-February/053537.html
For the 1.8 fix if you are curious.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at:
se Asterisk would simply throw it into
the from-sip-external context as an unknown/unauthenticated call? And of
course, when the peer *is* registered, and a call is made, Asterisk on the
central system allows the call as authenticated due to the source IP/port being
known via the registration status
carries caller ID number information, with can
obviously change between calls.
That's my best guess without "sip set debug on" output for a non-working
call and the configuration.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Hu
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www
://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20611
Is there a good reason you'd release 11.0 today with this serious a bug
still in it?
Asterisk 11 was made available Thursday of last week before this was
known, the announcement was delayed due to AstriCon.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | S
rogress on solving it at
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20611
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
else they are mismatched and
like you have seen, the universe will explode.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.d
t people
want to do varies greatly.
I hope this helps!
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
you've created an issue for this, thanks! I took a quick gander at
the packet capture and it appears that the Jingle and RTP portion of
things is perfectly fine. This may actually end up being a transcoding
issue, but we'll see once the issue is assigned and researched.
Cheers,
.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.a
ogle Voice would not work due to
ignoring candidates.
Instead of ignoring parts of the message that are not known just
ignore the ones we know may be present and that would cause a problem.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davi
io working - issues were discovered that have
been fixed. These fixes will be in the next release candidate. We also
changed a default setting to no for ICE support, this needs to be set to
yes for chan_motif to operate and I have updated the wiki to reflect this.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digiu
your verbose level is at a certain
number or higher. It's nothing to be worried about.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.
t an error. Are you experiencing some issue that is causing you
to think it is?
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com &am
Mitch Claborn wrote:
At the end of the output for "core show channels verbose" is a line that
reads "4 active calls". Does anyone know how that number is formatted if
there are more than 999 active calls? Will it have a comma or not?
It will not have a comma.
Cheers,
-
of course.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Pr
Joshua Colp wrote:
asterisk asterisk wrote:
Dear all,
Hola,
I wish to ask a question of the new Motif Channel in asterisk 11.
I successfully compile the binary and run without error. However, when
dialing out, no external connection only ringing.
During testing some issues were uncovered
channel driver,
but unfortunately they did not make the last release candidate. My
suggestion is to get Asterisk 11 from SVN or if you are not comfortable
with that wait until the official Asterisk 11 release.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW
ntioned. In
the case of Asterisk it treats it as a SIP URI when promiscredir is
enabled and doesn't use a peer entry, so it has no idea how to authenticate.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us ou
authentication happen.
I haven't tested that though.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.ast
nfiguration option I mentioned. It won't hurt.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
--
sues
that have been discovered and expect that upon release it will work well
for things I can control.
I also personally will be extending it further so that in Asterisk 12
there will be additional features since it's a fun module to work on.
What will they be? I don't quite know yet.
sk remains in the media path but depending on the codecs this is
optimized to be as efficient as possible. In the case of different
codecs with transcoding occurring your performance hit would come from
that, not from the fact you are using chan_motif itself.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc.
, but is what
i see correct (on a 1.8 system)?
Yes, there is no capability for video transcoding in any version of
Asterisk.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk
ers in the Google network.
I know the rules about cross-post and before casting stones - I've been
around Asterisk and other platforms for a long time.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Ch
ed
before anyone can even come close to diagnosing your issue.
To answer your question though there is nothing explicit you configure
to have audio work. It should "just work".
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville,
d that to SIPADDHEADER or something?
Asterisk doesn't allow you to manipulate the SDP as such so I'm afraid
there is no way for you to change that value. Internally within
applications they just discard the media received under such circumstances.
Cheers,
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc.
601 - 700 of 981 matches
Mail list logo