Thanks Lonnie for the info.
Regards
Michael Knill
From: Lonnie Abelbeck
Date: Thursday, 1 May 2025 at 12:00 pm
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] [Astlinux-devel] Announcing AstLinux Release:
1.5.10
Hi Michael,
We have no plans on supporting ARM hardware. There
Hi Michael,
We have no plans on supporting ARM hardware. There are single NIC x86_64 boxes
[1] that cost about the same (or less) than Raspberry Pi systems (board, case,
power, etc.).
As for the old Qotom J1900 box, while it works, there are a lot of newer N100
boxes about the same price. Ad
Hi Lonnie
Some additional interesting hardware here.
We are looking at putting Astlinux back on hardware again for our Telephony
Gateway’s because its cost effective, we have already established the
management infrastructure and its so darn reliable (so many issues with OpenWRT
based systems).
Thanks Michael.
PS not sure if anyone has used the Asterisk Guru GPT for ChatGPT. Its excellent
so I may end up moving to PJSIP anyway.
Regards
Michael Knill
From: Michael Keuter
Date: Saturday, 19 April 2025 at 5:24 pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users
Yes, chan_sip is still built in AstLinux for Asterisk 20.
Sent from a mobile device.
Michael Keuter
> Am 19.04.2025 um 08:52 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
>
> Hi Group
>
> I’m reading that chan_sip is no longer built by default in Asterisk 19. Has
> this been added to Asterisk 20 in Astlinu
: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] [Astlinux-devel] AstLinux Pre-Release with S3
object storage support (s3fs)
Great suggestion Michael!
Lonnie
> On Nov 6, 2024, at 7:55 AM, Michael Keuter wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> you can easily add a "command" opt
Hi Michael,
The s3fs support is just another method for remote file system storage.
For call recording, you probably want to initially write the files locally, and
then you could move them to /var/s3fs/mnt/ via cron or possibly a call hangup
hook or such.
S3 object storage offers inexpensive,
Great suggestion Michael!
Lonnie
> On Nov 6, 2024, at 7:55 AM, Michael Keuter wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> you can easily add a "command" option to the MixMonitor app to automatically
> move the recorded file after the call has finished.
> Example:
>
>
> exten => 77,1,Set(CHANNEL(langua
Hi Michael,
you can easily add a "command" option to the MixMonitor app to automatically
move the recorded file after the call has finished.
Example:
exten => 77,1,Set(CHANNEL(language)=en)
same =>
n,Set(CALLFILENAME=MM_${CALLERID(NUM)}-${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},Europe/Berlin,%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)})
Hi Guys
Could this work for call recording? I could move files across which are picked
up by an external Quality Management server for analysis.
Regards
Michael Knill
From: Lonnie Abelbeck
Date: Saturday, 6 July 2024 at 11:44 PM
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Cc: AstLinux Developers Mailing
Great! Thanks for the note.
Lonnie
> On Jun 10, 2024, at 7:56 PM, Ionel Chila via Astlinux-users
> wrote:
>
> That was easy. Looks like it worked perfect under UnRaid VM. I will ne to
> document and take some screenshots for future installations. I need to now
> configure and do some test
Hi Lonnie,
And I hope things are good with you Sir. Thanks again for all the hard work.
I was thinking about keeping the DAHDI PCI but I guess not anymore :) If the
UnRaid VM works I may just buy me one of these PAP2 boxes and put the analog
line for the house on that box.
Will let you know a
Hi Ionel,
Do you use still use DAHDI PCI hardware? If so, that is a problem as the
AstLinux VM ISO does not include the DAHDI PCI firmware files. If you are still
using DAHDI PCI hardware I would keep your dedicated hardware.
On the other hand, if your setup is VoIP-only, I have not used UnRai
Hi,
I own a Mango as a travel router flashed with latest OpenWRT version instead of
stock firmware and are very pleased with it. Throughput is not very high but
that's normal given the SoC specs.
Regards.___
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@
> On Jun 9, 2023, at 9:54 PM, Michael Knill
> wrote:
>
> System Uptime: 989 days, 1:29
>
> Its on an APU2 in a hospital environment so never had a power failure.
> Yes I should have upgraded it long ago but pretty cool!
>
> Regards
> Michael Knill
Hey Michael,
Thanks for reporting!
Over
Thanks Ionel,
I also do astlinux backups via scp to a remote NAS that way.
What I've set up now are automated backups from local laptops into a disk
directly plugged to the Astlinux box.
The disk is powered on at specific times, then Astlinux mounts the disk, rsyncs
some folders in the laptops
Thanks David for your tips, I'll take a look on your scripts and try to make my
own.
Regards.___
Astlinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
Donations to support AstLinux
I wanted to do something similar a couple of years ago... in my case I
wanted to send notification over Pushover service. I ended up re-writing
the notification feature of AstLinux. Previously each service that
needs to send a notification did it on their own. I centralized it all
into a single
You’re correct PCI vs PCI-E :) my mistake
I actually do have a spare Digium AEX410 PIC-E which should do the trick for
that mobo. Will that work?
Cheers
> On Feb 5, 2022, at 12:26 PM, Ionel Chila via Astlinux-users
> wrote:
>
> That sealed the deal Lonnie. Why break a perfectly worki
That sealed the deal Lonnie. Why break a perfectly working thing LOL. I will
leave it alone for now. The SIP/ATA gateways won’t work with the automation
stuff I am doing.
Thank you all for continuing to support these analog TDM410 cards in all
astlinux releases. That’s a big ask and you g
> On Feb 5, 2022, at 11:50 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Ionel Chila via Astlinux-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> I had this dedicated box with a Digium Wildcard TDM410 running forever,
>> thanks for all the hard work that is put into this great project. I run
> Am 05.02.2022 um 18:50 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck :
>
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Ionel Chila via Astlinux-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> I had this dedicated box with a Digium Wildcard TDM410 running forever,
>> thanks for all the hard work that is put into this great project. I run few
>>
> On Feb 5, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Ionel Chila via Astlinux-users
> wrote:
>
> I had this dedicated box with a Digium Wildcard TDM410 running forever,
> thanks for all the hard work that is put into this great project. I run few
> SIP trunks on this home PBX with VOIP providers from Europe, Asi
Thanks Michael,
O. K. I don't know that.
I updated trough CLI both astlinux and RUNIX and get new release after
rebooted. The Webgui was still old, and after that I copied ower alternate
webgui tar and owerwrited files in www.
After copy I have new gui.
regards Nedi
Am 20. Apr. 2021, 22:42
The WebGUI is updated automatically when you update the AstLinux distro.
The tar.gz files are only needed if your want to use a custom WebGUI (or test
something).
Sent from a mobile device.
Michael Keuter
> Am 20.04.2021 um 18:50 schrieb nedi :
>
> Hi,
> i updated one PBX to the : astlinux-
Thanks for the advice Lonnie. Why do we want to keep it behind the
firewall? I ask from curiosity, not from spite. I plan on vlaning the
phones. Thank you for the starting point.
--
Kind Regards,
Jerry Gartner
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 7:50 PM Lonnie Abelbeck
wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2021, at 3:27 PM
On Feb 19, 2021, at 3:27 PM, Jerry Gartner wrote:
>
> I need to put an astlinux system that is currently acting as the network WAN
> firewall and gateway behind a new device that will be acting as the WAN
> firewall and gateway. What all is involved in doing this? After I disable the
> firewal
Hi,
Thanks, I try to explain full details:
I have 2 free DDNS providers: Changeip (configured from GUI) and Afraid.org
(configured in a custom script executed after boot from /mnt/kd/rc.local).
Apparently both are working fine and everytime there's an IP address change
both domains are updated
> On Dec 31, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Daryl Richards via Astlinux-users
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020-12-19 2:34 p.m., Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>> Announcing AstLinux Pre-Release: astlinux-1.4-4940-797713
>> ** Request for Testing
>> This pre-release replaces getdns/stubby with unbound for DNS-over-TLS
On 2020-12-19 2:34 p.m., Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
Announcing AstLinux Pre-Release: astlinux-1.4-4940-797713
** Request for Testing
This pre-release replaces getdns/stubby with unbound for DNS-over-TLS
functionality. The latest Unbound 1.13.0
adds TCP/TLS stream reuse and TCP fast open which
Hi Group
Sorry guys I think this was a config error. I had the same address in the
primary test and secondary route which I suspect broke things.
Regards
Michael Knill
Sent from my iPhone so please excuse my brevity.
> On 13 Nov 2020, at 9:07 am, Michael Knill
> wrote:
>
> Hi Lonnie
>
Hi Lonnie
Yes a weird one. It is a static IP Address on eth0.100 and the cable was out
for a while yet it did not fail over until I manually shut the interface. This
was even after I reset the box.
I looked at the routing table and the default route remained pointing to the
Default Gateway.
I w
Hi Michael,
If I understand correctly, your upstream internet worked for some destinations,
but had an outage for others, so one of your WAN Failover -> "Target IPv4
Hosts" still worked, so it did not automatically failover.
Unless this was a one-off fluke, you may want to consider "Target IPv4
Hi,
Just in case it helps, there seems someone was able to compile last dahdi
version v3.1.0 and make it work on a modern kernel with a few changes in code:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1090482-start-0.html
Regards.
Hi Gonzalo,
I quickly tried, it p
8 Aug 2020 23:49:49 +
From: Michael Knill
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Astlinux-users Digest, Vol 168, Issue 8
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Gonzalo
Unfo
x86_64
|
Thanks for your effort trying it.
Regards.
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 18:19:29 -0500
From: Lonnie Abelbeck
To: AstLinux Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Astlinux-users Digest, Vol 168, Issue 8
Message-ID: <256cc4b1-3043-4610-9
with Asterisk.
Regards
Michael Knill
From: Gonzalo Ibáñez
Reply to: AstLinux List
Date: Saturday, 29 August 2020 at 9:34 am
To: AstLinux List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Astlinux-users Digest, Vol 168, Issue 8
I really can't understand stopping dahdi support for these cards as they are
I really can't understand stopping dahdi support for these cards as they are
still easily found at low prices on AliExpress and others and the cheapest way
to connect an Asterisk box to PSTN lines/devices (even cheaper than ATA boxes
and without the need of an external device).
Regards.
___
Hi Gonzalo,
I quickly tried, it patched, but there were compile issues ... I'll look at it
a little more, but no promises.
Question, is your box running a x86_64 CPU ?
Lonnie
> On Aug 28, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Gonzalo Ibáñez wrote:
>
> Hi Lonnie,
>
> I still use wctdm driver on a TDM400P card;
Hi Lonnie,
I still use wctdm driver on a TDM400P card; would be great if a patch could be
added to keep support for these cards.
Regards.
___
Astlinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf
20 at 7:48 am
To: AstLinux List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] AstLinux Pre-Release: astlinux-1.4-4801-574be0
Just wanted to thank and congratulate Lonnie and the Astlinux dev team for this
significant milestone. Moving to kernel 4.19 LTS extends kernel support to at
least the end of 2024.
Well
Just wanted to thank and congratulate Lonnie and the Astlinux dev team for
this significant milestone. Moving to kernel 4.19 LTS extends kernel
support to at least the end of 2024.
Well Done. And Thank You.
David
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:45 AM Lonnie Abelbeck
wrote:
> Announcing Pre-Releas
Thank you Lonnie and Michael,
I will give it a try, I got the idea that all the services could only
be enabled on the LAN internal interface.
/Patrick
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:15 PM Lonnie Abelbeck
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 27, 2020, at 5:52 PM, Patrick Warichet
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
>
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 5:52 PM, Patrick Warichet
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I had to migrate my Astlinux appliance from being my
> router/firewall/SIP/etc. and hooked it up to a new router/firewall
> that I have to test. I like to keep using Astlinux for several
> services (DNScrypt, DHCP, SIP,
Hi Patrick
If its just a host, I think its best to turn off the firewall altogether on the
Network Tab and then add your route to rc.elocal.
Regards
Michael Knill
On 28/4/20, 8:53 am, "Patrick Warichet" wrote:
Hello,
I had to migrate my Astlinux appliance from being my
router/fi
Thanks for the pointers.
A good start!
-Graham-
Michael Knill wrote on 29/10/2019 01:51:
Not a large site but I don't see any issues.
Use a SIP based PA vendor that is Asterisk certified e.g.:
Cyberdata - https://www.cyberdata.net/
2N - https://www.2n.cz/en_GB/products
Regards
Michael Knill
Not a large site but I don't see any issues.
Use a SIP based PA vendor that is Asterisk certified e.g.:
Cyberdata - https://www.cyberdata.net/
2N - https://www.2n.cz/en_GB/products
Regards
Michael Knill
On 29/10/19, 11:28 am, "Graham S. Jarvis" wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have AstLi
So I did a quick search and it seems like my first use of Astlinux dates to
around 2008. I also started with a PC Engines WRAP board. I must credit
Astlinux for keeping me from getting rusty, having moved into a management
role I did less and less programming work. I learned Bash, Perl, PHP,
ipt
Happy birthday Astlinux!
I started with Astlinux on a PC Engines WRAP in 2006 I believe using 0.4 (I
found a post).
I moved away from Astlinux for a little while but saw the error of my ways and
now it's the core of my business.
Regards
Michael Knill
From: Lonnie Abelbeck
Reply to: AstLinux Li
> Am 01.09.2019 um 17:40 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck :
>
> Happy Birthday to AstLinux, which is 15 years old this month!
>
> AstLinux History:
> https://www.astlinux-project.org/about.html
>
> Personally I started using AstLinux 0.2.x about 6 months later, Darrick
> Hartman jumped in around the s
I think I started using astlinux somewhere around the 0.28 or so builds.. it
was real close to the beginning.. I had played with asterisk since about 02 or
03 around there.. my first astlinux was on a Net4801 board also.. that board
later became a MikroTik Router in my office until its flas
Cool.
May still test with AWS but will certainly test out Linode when its there. Yay
thanks for that!
Regards
Michael Knill
On 27/7/19, 10:29 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
Hi Michael,
Linode publicly announced April 30
"Keep an eye out for more announcements on our upcoming I
Hi Michael,
Linode publicly announced April 30
"Keep an eye out for more announcements on our upcoming India and Sydney data
centers"
Just recently Mumbai India went online.
https://blog.linode.com/2019/07/17/linode-mumbai-data-center-now-open/
Before that was Toronto
https://blog.linode.com/20
Hi All
As I will be building an Astlinux based Softswitch for my customers, I am
looking for a reliable hosting provider. Unfortunately there do not seem to be
many here that will allow me to build with a custom ISO other than using a
dedicated server on VMWare IaaS. Although this will be a goo
Sure thing. I will order some and let you know
Regards
Michael Knill
On 2/7/19, 7:40 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
Hi Michael,
I have not personally used an "apu4c2" (APU2 NIC x4) but expect it to work
fine.
The "apu4c2" has been around long enough to get any production b
Hi Michael,
I have not personally used an "apu4c2" (APU2 NIC x4) but expect it to work fine.
The "apu4c2" has been around long enough to get any production board tweaks
done if needed.
BTW, we "guessed" at the system-vendor string for the "apu4c2", it should
appear as:
Hardware: PC Engines AP
Thanks Lonnie. Just for reference, here are my numbers:
pbx ~ # system-vendor
Lanner FW-7525B NIC x4
pbx ~ # openssl speed -elapsed -evp aes-128-cbc
...
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes
aes-128
Thanks Lonnie for the info. Yes I hope to do some testing eventually as this
can overcome one of the big issues I have with mobile integration. Just wanting
to check that no one else had done any testing as I am EXTREMELY time poor ☹.
Already have a Vultr server! So quick to deploy and so cheap.
Hi Michael,
In general, for mobile devices, WireGuard is much more battery friendly since
no keepalive packets are required ... a mobile Wireguard client can establish a
tunnel to a server... sleep-disconnect-wake while the server endpoint maintains
the crypto-route state ... updates the Mobile
I'm certainly looking forward to Wireguard on IOS but I am interested in its
use for a VoIP softphone such as Bria.
Does having the tunnel up all the time drain the battery?
Regards
Michael Knill
On 2/2/19, 10:13 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
Announcing Pre-Release Version: astlinux-1.3-40
Hi Nedi
It would be better to find out the exact conditions when it fails rather than
the shotgun approach which could be risky and introduce other issues.
I would use Monit which checks every minute and is very flexible. E.g.
Check program Check-Script
path
Hi Nedi
I’m looking at doing something similar. I will be using Monit.
Regards
Michael Knill
Sent from my iPhone so please excuse my brevity.
On 14 Sep 2018, at 7:31 am, nedi mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi, i have trouble with one bx and message rejected after internet going down
for some tim
On 2018-09-10 9:24 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
No update for Wireguard? I know it's a pretty fast moving target but it would
be nice to see getting to the latest snapshot every astlinux release...
Thanks!
Yes, as per the Pre-Release ChangeLog
https://s3.amazonaws.com/beta.astlinux-project/ast
> On Sep 10, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Daryl Richards via Astlinux-users
> wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2018 11:01 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>> Announcing Pre-Release Version: astlinux-1.3-3888-523a33
>>
>> The AstLinux Team is regularly upgrading packages containing security and
>> bug fixes as well as addin
On 9/9/2018 11:01 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
Announcing Pre-Release Version: astlinux-1.3-3888-523a33
The AstLinux Team is regularly upgrading packages containing security and bug
fixes as well as adding new features of our own.
-- Linux Kernel 3.16.57, security and bug fixes.
-- genx86_64-vm
Wow thanks so much. Im looking forward to testing it out
Regards
Michael Knill
On 25/8/18, 7:31 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
Update,
Added virtio-blk block device system support
https://github.com/astlinux-project/astlinux/commit/7857ceccfd1434036e425dcbb4cbb5ef85104778
Update,
Added virtio-blk block device system support
https://github.com/astlinux-project/astlinux/commit/7857ceccfd1434036e425dcbb4cbb5ef85104778
Many thanks to Michael Keuter for testing and decision making.
Tested via Proxmox and Vultr (hosted).
Back to the original topic, AstLinux 1.3.4 and
Thinking about this more, I think it makes sense to add virtio-blk support.
Michael Keuter concurs as well.
I talked with the Vultr support, and they were crystal clear that they will
only support virtio-blk and not virtio-scsi in the predictable future.
There are pros/cons for either virtio-b
But Astlinux could be built with that. My own personal custom build I
have CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK=m set. I don't know if having it as a module would
be good enough. I do not build the install ISO however... is that
necessary for Vultr or can you start from the raw image?
David
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018
Sadly, https://www.vultr.com does not work with AstLinux since they require
virtio-blk disk driver support, while AstLinux uses virtio-scsi drivers.
Lonnie
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 2:16 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck
> wrote:
>
> For fun, I am testing Vultr, the web interface is nice and adding our VM IS
For fun, I am testing Vultr, the web interface is nice and adding our VM ISO is
very simple.
But, I can't get the base storage to mount, they say they use SCSI_VIRTIO,
which we support.
I'll report back when I learn more.
Lonnie
> On Aug 22, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck
> wrote:
>
Christopher, good points ... thanks for sharing your experience.
Michael, I ran across a Linode-like provider "Vultr", with a Sydney location.
Until today I have never heard of them (just my ignorance I suspect).
https://www.vultr.com/pricing/
Vultr looks like it should work with an AstLinux I
the big issue i have with AWS is no ability t ogain console access when needed
to get things working right. I have quite a few servers running on AWS, however
my Asterisk servers are not among them.. AWS doesnt do real well at limiting
someones Rogue instance and i had issues with latencies and
I have tried and failed with AWS and Google. The issue appears to be a
requirement for GRUB bootloader.
David
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Michael Knill <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Lonnie
>
> Not too good Im afraid. AWS is certainly the go for me:
>
> PING speedtest.to
Hi Lonnie
Not too good Im afraid. AWS is certainly the go for me:
PING speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com (139.162.65.37): 56 data bytes
--- speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 105.966/106.090/106.254 ms
PI
Hi Michael,
No I haven't, but it does look like you can import VMware images.
I really like Linode for AstLinux in the cloud, but sadly there is no Linode
locations in Australia (yet).
If you wouldn't mind, hows does the latency compare for you:
Linode - Asia Pacific (Tokyo)
ping -q -c10 speed
duplicate IP's.
>>>>
>>>> Are you using a numeric IP or DNS name ? Self-signed or ACME ?
>>>>
>>>> Lonnie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
t;> I have not seen such a thing. Does sound like a local network
issue.
>>>>
>>>> Are you accessing it via a LAN device ? If so, (ex eth1) try
"arp-scan -l -I eth1" to look for duplicate IP's.
>>>>
>>>
k issue.
>>>>
>>>> Are you accessing it via a LAN device ? If so, (ex eth1) try
"arp-scan -l -I eth1" to look for duplicate IP's.
>>>>
>>>> Are you using a numeric IP or DNS name ? Self-signed or ACME ?
>>>>
52 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have not seen such a thing. Does sound like a local network issue.
>>>>
>>>> Are you accessing it via a LAN device ? If so, (ex eth1) try "arp-scan -l
>>>> -I eth1" to l
If so, (ex eth1) try
"arp-scan -l -I eth1" to look for duplicate IP's.
>>>
>>> Are you using a numeric IP or DNS name ? Self-signed or ACME ?
>>>
>>> Lonnie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
for duplicate IP's.
>>>
>>> Are you using a numeric IP or DNS name ? Self-signed or ACME ?
>>>
>>> Lonnie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Aug 8, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Michael Knill
>>>> wrote
;
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 8, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Michael Knill
wrote:
>>>
>>> No its every transaction on any page and I am talking 20 seconds here.
Its like its waiting for a DNS timeout or something but I couldn't see anything
with t
PM, Michael Knill
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> No its every transaction on any page and I am talking 20 seconds here. Its
>>> like its waiting for a DNS timeout or something but I couldn't see anything
>>> with tcpdump?
>>>
>>> Regards
>> Michael Knill
>>
>> From: David Kerr
>> Reply-To: AstLinux List
>> Date: Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 10:54 pm
>> To: AstLinux List
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Astlinux Web GUI slow
>>
>> Every page or ju
or something but I couldn't see anything
>> with tcpdump?
>>
>> Regards
>> Michael Knill
>>
>> From: David Kerr
>> Reply-To: AstLinux List
>> Date: Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 10:54 pm
>> To: AstLinux List
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-
ate: Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 10:54 pm
> To: AstLinux List
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Astlinux Web GUI slow
>
> Every page or just one in particular? I have found that the status page
can be slow to display if you have enabled a lot of the sections. In that
Kerr
> Reply-To: AstLinux List
> Date: Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 10:54 pm
> To: AstLinux List
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Astlinux Web GUI slow
>
> Every page or just one in particular? I have found that the status page can
> be slow to display if you have enabled a
List
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Astlinux Web GUI slow
Every page or just one in particular? I have found that the status page can be
slow to display if you have enabled a lot of the sections. In that case one of
the culprits seems to be DNS lookups (e.g. to list hosts for NTP time sources,
Every page or just one in particular? I have found that the status page
can be slow to display if you have enabled a lot of the sections. In that
case one of the culprits seems to be DNS lookups (e.g. to list hosts for
NTP time sources, etc.). Lonnie and I did some work recently to speed up
that
Wow thanks Lonnie. High Availability for Astlinux is fantastic news.
Im very much looking forward to testing it out.
Regards
Michael Knill
On 28/7/18, 5:02 am, "Lonnie Abelbeck" wrote:
Michael, a follow-up,
Michael Keuter (per his suggestion) and I have been working on adding
kee
Michael, a follow-up,
Michael Keuter (per his suggestion) and I have been working on adding
keepalived http://www.keepalived.org/ to AstLinux.
Basically we have it all working, quite well actually, though we have not yet
tested enough to make keepalived part of standard builds.
keepalived adds
> Am 22.07.2018 um 09:35 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
> Thanks Lonnie
>
> Yes I agree totally. But there is also another factor which is restoration
> time and a broken Astlinux box have a much longer restoration time than all
> the others.
Yes, that's a valid point.
It seems it is much depen
Thanks Lonnie
Yes I agree totally. But there is also another factor which is restoration time
and a broken Astlinux box have a much longer restoration time than all the
others.
I have actually had a couple of storage issues and a lightning strike so it
certainly happens and I don't know the lon
Thanks Michael.
In my testing the phones reregistered quite quickly actually e.g. a couple of
seconds. The arping would have sorted out the ARP table on the phone.
I actually don't want auto failover at this time. Lots of testing required as
it could actually break a working system e.g. duplica
Hi Michael,
I don't have any experience to comment on your hot standby solution, but just
some birds-eye-view thoughts ...
1) Make sure your High Availability solution doesn't create more problems than
it solves.
2) Solve possible availability issues in order of likelihood.
For example, consi
> Am 21.07.2018 um 03:11 schrieb Michael Knill
> :
>
> Hi Group
>
> I have won a reasonable size customer (90 extensions) and Im currently
> testing Astlinux hot standby.
> This is what I am planning to do:
> • The Astlinux HS is in parallel to the primary Astlinux server with
> differ
Lonnie,
Found it. I must have originally misread that as referring to a subject
line instead of an email address though it plainly says email address. I
think my mindset was that there would not be a "from" email address and
only a "to" since it was originating from Astlinux. Now I am not
understa
Hi Cody,
The "From Email (Optional)" field defaults to the Network tab settings ...
SAFE_ASTERISK_NOTIFY_FROM, or if not defined then UPS_NOTIFY_FROM .
BTW, If the email address field is of the form: name
Then the resulting email address is stripped to be just: [email protected]
So, look at y
Part my error . . . I guess.
Did the second field of the Test SMTP Mail Relay used to be a subject line
and not a "From Email *(Optional)*" field? Mine is defaulting to fill in
"AstLinux On HP Thin Client" that I would have put in as a subject line not
as a "from" email address. Note that I had no
1 - 100 of 859 matches
Mail list logo
