Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] squeezebox setup for audiophiles

2011-03-18 Thread Pat Farrell
of it, but it will not last 100,000 miles. There is truth to the old can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear but sometimes, a few tweaks can make a serious difference. For me, stereo is about the music, not the gear, and I have no interest in tweaks other than properly positioning my speakers. YMMV -- Pat

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Mac Mini as server?

2011-03-14 Thread Pat Farrell
for high accuracy in either a studio or audiophile world. And its never going to meet the needs of either a recording studio or a serious audiophile. Look elsewhere. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why do things sound the way they do?

2011-03-11 Thread Pat Farrell
effects if you use them), but the sound you hear depends on that plus the way the guitarist plays it. In the 60s, there was graffiti all over London saying Clapton is God which might be a bit of an exaggeration, but the boy can play. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter $999

2011-03-10 Thread Pat Farrell
On 03/10/2011 02:26 PM, ralphpnj wrote: And what does OBE stand for? I always heard Overtaken By Events but in this case, perhaps Obsoleted By Europeans -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
love Lowthers and flee watt amps. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
canceled my subscription to The Absolute Sound in disgust, they are right one thing. The goal of music reproduction is to sound like un-amplified instruments and voices in real music halls. There are no crossovers screwing up the phase with a real singer in a real hall. -- Pat Farrell http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
. But if your kid calls mom or dad then you pick it out instantly. Everyone there answers to mom or dad, but they are all listening to something specific. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-27 Thread Pat Farrell
to the student. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-26 Thread Pat Farrell
on frequency. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Attacking the problem at the wrong end

2011-02-26 Thread Pat Farrell
, going to Interlochen Arts Camp, having private lessions for 5+ years, etc. I know very well what the sound of a trumpet is in my house. Playing Winton Marsalis on my very nice stereo is not the same. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] any ideas accepted

2011-01-22 Thread Pat Farrell
still more crossovers, it becomes more impossible to keep then phase correct. Get a Quad or Maggie instead, no stinking crossover. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What is a Transporter SE?

2011-01-17 Thread Pat Farrell
one of the first production Transporters. I was not in the beta program. I played with the knob the first days I had it. Its a cool technical tour-de-force, dynamically programmable force feedback. I've never touched the knob in the years since. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Beatles 24 vs 16 bits...

2011-01-11 Thread Pat Farrell
any signficant bits in the last 8 bits of any 24 bit sample made from it. Those machines barely had 70 dB of SNR. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hifi rack: wood or glass shelves?

2010-12-30 Thread Pat Farrell
On 12/30/2010 10:22 AM, konut wrote: Glass has the potential to vibrate. I stick with wood. The stuff that they use to make guitars and violins? -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] My perfect audiophile box

2010-11-12 Thread Pat Farrell
at audiophiles cost $1,000. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-11 Thread Pat Farrell
is important when the music room is also the living room. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-11 Thread Pat Farrell
of the old stuff gets sold. I'm even thinking of selling some of my 30+ microphones. I still have a pair of 70s vintage Large Advent speakers, my 40 year old 35mm film darkroom, . -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-10 Thread Pat Farrell
the one DAC, its not like I need a store. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Best place to see my Benchmark DAC1

2010-11-09 Thread Pat Farrell
you think is the best place to sell used audiophile gear? Thank Pat -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] High definition digital vs red book

2010-10-29 Thread Pat Farrell
. But too many are mangled by marketing, idiot producers, etc. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Stereophile Review II: What conclusion can be drawn from the Measurements?

2010-09-23 Thread Pat Farrell
not care. That folks won't pay for better quality. Its a market thing, not education. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Stereophile Review II: What conclusion can be drawn from the Measurements?

2010-09-23 Thread Pat Farrell
, he who has the gold rules. There are lots in the industry responsible, but its not because the engineers are uneducated. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Unbalanced Analog Cable Help

2010-09-22 Thread Pat Farrell
, whereas unbalanced are usually under 3 feet long, and get pretty wonky after 10 feet or so. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Unbalanced Analog Cable Help

2010-09-21 Thread Pat Farrell
, you can also send balanced signals down a 1/4 TRS jack (looks like a stereo headphone jack). This connection takes up less space in a rack than XLR connections. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Stereophile Review II: What conclusion can be drawn from the Measurements?

2010-09-17 Thread Pat Farrell
On 09/17/2010 02:46 PM, seanadams wrote: I haven't read the review yet but if the touch is resolving 17 bits that is probably the correct maximum capability of the DAC chip. All things have a noise floor... it is not realistic to expect that performance from a $300 device employing a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Sound quality between wav and flac

2010-08-17 Thread Pat Farrell
, but not a good description of what actually happens. There is no difference in sound quality, there is no difference in the decompressed files. Its easy to test for yourself. Any person who claims otherwise is blowing smoke. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Digital OUT encoding on TP, now AES S/PDIF together

2010-07-28 Thread Pat Farrell
' digital audio. For sure, and putting a digital signal through a TT patch panel is going to do wonderful things to the wave forms. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Confused between options - any advice welcome

2010-07-11 Thread Pat Farrell
Proper active speakers (not just speakers with amps inside them) are an expensive proposition... Yes, but IMHO, they are the future. I don't think you save money, but the amp engineer can deliver what the driver engineer wants, how, when, what flavor, etc. -- Pat Farrell http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-09 Thread Pat Farrell
accordingly.. Do you seriously think that replacing a $2 cap with a $50 cap will greatly change the sound? Does the term eye candy for rich people mean anything to you? -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-09 Thread Pat Farrell
On 07/09/2010 10:03 AM, michael123 wrote: So, you say that the audio design ends at 200$? No I am saying that if you expect significant improvements in audio quality by changing a $1 cap with a $200 cap, you are drinking All IMHO, YMMV, etc -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-07 Thread Pat Farrell
in any volume, and was too computer for the audiophile purists, and too high priced for consumers. Suppose someone wanted to make a TP-2, it would be what percent better than the initial TP, in what area would you put the engineering? He's dead, Jim -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] What's next or is this it?

2010-07-07 Thread Pat Farrell
of the parts. Its the engineering, NRE, non-recurring engineering expense. The only way to lower the impact of the NRE is to move more units. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Lossless download sites?

2010-07-03 Thread Pat Farrell
is so processed that lossless is not that important. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Lossless download sites?

2010-07-03 Thread Pat Farrell
doing for 5 or so years. No arguments possible from the evil goons at the RIAA, I have the cd, case, all that crap. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Lossless download sites?

2010-07-03 Thread Pat Farrell
On 07/03/2010 09:10 PM, Robin Bowes wrote: On 04/07/10 00:59, Pat Farrell wrote: No arguments possible from the evil goons at the RIAA, I have the cd, case, all that crap. ...except that is technically not legal in the UK. Well, here it is technocally illegal to talk about what goons

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Yet another Touch vs. Transporter thread

2010-06-22 Thread Pat Farrell
. And, IMHO, there will never be a Logitech TP 2. Perhaps a Sean's Garage TP 2, if he hasn't gone off to spend his retirement surfing. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Yet another Touch vs. Transporter thread

2010-06-22 Thread Pat Farrell
the physics. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Yet another Touch vs. Transporter thread

2010-06-22 Thread Pat Farrell
than 24. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Vintage equipment: Opinions?

2010-06-07 Thread Pat Farrell
for blowing up. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] The sound of jitter

2010-05-18 Thread Pat Farrell
audiophiles out of their money. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Hard facts supporting the quality of Touch digital out.

2010-05-12 Thread Pat Farrell
archives, and I hate using the Forum software, so I can't help you there. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-05 Thread Pat Farrell
is talking about a nearly trivial single multiply or shift function. DSP is more like dealing with quantum physics rather than Newtonian physics. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-03 Thread Pat Farrell
. Using the natural roll off of an analog tape was part of the art of audio engineering. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-03 Thread Pat Farrell
would think that it could be perfectly matched with enough DSP power. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-02 Thread Pat Farrell
are forcing distortion. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-05-02 Thread Pat Farrell
mswlogo wrote: You guys are clueless. Now you resort to personal insults. That lowers your SeanTrollScale to 0/10 You are still a troll Do not feed the trolls. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
could rebuild the four-barrel carb on my Pontiac 389 V8, as well as nearly anything else on the car. With modern fuel injection and mixture and spark advance systems, they are considered black boxes that are replaced. Even TVs have become like toasters, use and throw away. -- Pat Farrell http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
, while the TP is still for sale, its no longer a $2000 product and its not getting any press. Even audiophiles like their tail fins. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
like it. And it still sounds pretty darn good. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Display problems

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
mlsstl wrote: I didn't know they were interviewing candidates for the position of forum cop. Guess I need to watch my step from here on out and keep my opinions to myself 0/10 -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
mswlogo wrote: I work with analog and digital signals at data rates that would make your head spin. Specifics please? Replies like yours are priceless. I'm sorry that the clipping I'm referring to is beyond your grasp. 1/10 -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-30 Thread Pat Farrell
mswlogo wrote: We determine the speed at which IONS fly through a vaccum in order to determine their Mass. I did that in high school physics class, over 40 years ago. You are still a troll, and your score is no higher than 1/10 on the SeanTrollScale -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-27 Thread Pat Farrell
in the 70s. But they had two characterists that were not talked about nearly as much as their great performance: 1) they were amazingly inefficient, and needed serious power to drive 2) they sounded great when loud, but totally unimpressive at low volume (say background music levels). -- Pat Farrell

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-25 Thread Pat Farrell
of modern science. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-25 Thread Pat Farrell
. The value is calculated. The calculations are simple. I've got a write up on this page: http://www.pfarrell.com/prc/bits.html The calculation is driven by the number of bits in the signal. Each bit gives you about 6 dB of range. 16*6 is 96. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Resolution Test and Don't EVER use Digital Volume Control

2010-04-25 Thread Pat Farrell
were underground, but they were weird enough that I couldn't stand being in either for more than a few minutes. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Optical out;no optical in question.

2010-04-21 Thread Pat Farrell
are analog RCA, be happy. There are coax digital connections terminated with RCA, but they are pretty rare. I haven't looked at my Touch carefully recently, but I don't remember it having a coax digital output. Toslink, sure. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporters Future?

2010-04-13 Thread Pat Farrell
richardw wrote: sorry you struggle reading my lack of interest in the shift key. I share Robin's view that your words would be easier to read if you took a nanosecond to use proper capitalization. But then, perhaps you are not really interested in communicating. -- Pat Farrell http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] RC (Inguz etc.)

2010-04-11 Thread Pat Farrell
for megadollar interconnects. I probably have 30 suitable cables in lengths from 3 feet to 50 feet in my basement/studio. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Memristance in interconnect cables

2010-04-11 Thread Pat Farrell
holes, which flow for electrical current, don't know direction. Shields are good, which is why RCA connectors are lame. Use proper balanced connections, like the Transporter supports. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Memristance in interconnect cables

2010-04-11 Thread Pat Farrell
in the early 50s had access to a lot of war surplus gear with RCA connections. They were cheap and adequate for the time. Its not like they are actually a good connection. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] 7.5 Transporter

2010-04-08 Thread Pat Farrell
, and probably some features that I have not noticed, the heart of 7.5 is support for the Touch. Its been a non-event as far as the rest of my SlimDevices collection is concerned. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-05 Thread Pat Farrell
. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-04 Thread Pat Farrell
. But if the circumstances are different, and all the surgeon has is my pocket Swiss Army knife, I bet the surgeon will do better than an intern. Its about the music, not geeks claiming mine is bigger -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-04-03 Thread Pat Farrell
take five to ten years. The problem is that the music industry (and the RIAA) have no interest in music. They care only about sales and revenue. Its only the boutique folks that care at all about quality, accuracy, etc. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Switching to slow rollof filter in AK4396

2010-04-03 Thread Pat Farrell
that there is no business case for putting much effort into the Transporter. I have no idea what the suitable definition of much is, but I expect its close to zero. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-30 Thread Pat Farrell
expect that in time, there will be very little hardware differences in even high end audio equipment. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
michael123 wrote: Shall I continue? No You have become a troll. And your SeanTrollScore for these recent posts is 0/10. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76315 -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
claim, built your own. Otherwise, please, go away. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
have a longer time frame, anything computer related that is four or five years old is economically obsolete. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-29 Thread Pat Farrell
) have gotten so powerful that 99% of the buyers never use even a fraction of their capabilities. Pat -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-26 Thread Pat Farrell
slow. Accept it and move on with your life -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-26 Thread Pat Farrell
to be changed by anyone emplyeed at Logitech either. Give it up. You have become a troll. And your SeanTrollScore for these recent posts is 0/10. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=76315 -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-26 Thread Pat Farrell
?t=76315 You can't get a negative score on the SeanTrollScore, but we may have to change the rules just for you. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-23 Thread Pat Farrell
compiler and linker, and the license for that costs solid five figures. So they thought that no one would spring for a legal license, so there was no reason to release the firmware source code. I have worked on other embedded systems, and expensive tools are frequent in the business. -- Pat

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Why cannot you make Transporter support 176.4 and 192Khz/24?

2010-03-23 Thread Pat Farrell
, it makes far less. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] listening to HD Audio (24/96)

2010-03-09 Thread Pat Farrell
Even the tinySBS is stable and works well. In any event, you have both a Transporter and a Touch, are you experiencing problems with 24/96? Nope, no problems, but I don't have much 24/88.2 o 24/96 content. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] listening to HD Audio (24/96)

2010-03-08 Thread Pat Farrell
will see that 7.5.0 has been feature frozen as they beat down the last few high priority bugs. I'd be serious beers that it will be released by the end of March, this year. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Subwoofer for Active Speakers?

2010-03-01 Thread Pat Farrell
handle from reaching the main woofers.] I don't think you could easily connect my particular REL model to active speakers. There are no speaker-level connections on most (all?) active speakers to tap into. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter troubleshooting question

2010-02-19 Thread Pat Farrell
cosmopolous wrote: I'll try that tonight. fingers crossed. Is this something that's common? It happens. I've had it perhaps twice in the many years that I've had my Transporter. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] External DAC - does it make a difference?

2010-02-19 Thread Pat Farrell
Curt962 wrote: Of course the best equipment will be capable of resolving the smallest subtleties better than will lesser components. For some suitable definition of best equipment Perhaps. Maybe. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Upgrade. Weiss DAC202 (Minerva) or Berkeley Alpha?

2010-02-12 Thread Pat Farrell
in the An interesting video thread If you want to argue that we would be better off with 18 or 20 bit files instead of the RedBook's 16 bits, you would have at least a leg to stand on. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] DAC Upgrade. Weiss DAC202 (Minerva) or Berkeley Alpha?

2010-02-12 Thread Pat Farrell
. Weiss is definitely better than Transporter. The problem is that hooking up via SPDIF is not a good idea as it will introduce jitter :-( Weiss works the best via IEEE 1394, as Transporter prefers Ethernet This may be true, but I was commenting on your other paragraphs, which were pure hype. -- Pat

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-05 Thread Pat Farrell
. A standard jazz trio, of piano, drums and standup bass, has lots of the subtle stuff that MP3 does badly. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-03 Thread Pat Farrell
been told this, pay attention. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-03 Thread Pat Farrell
about TCP/IP can cause jitter in any SqueezeBox device. You have been told this, pay attention. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-02-03 Thread Pat Farrell
Kuro wrote: I'm (we're) your paying customers. You do not call your paying customers trolls. Sean is retired. You are not his customer. You are a troll. Do not feed the trolls. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Touch versus Transporter - beta testers chime in please

2010-01-31 Thread Pat Farrell
outputs, which are handy if your amp has balanced input. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter over ethernet

2010-01-31 Thread Pat Farrell
? That makes zero sense. And jitter is not going to vary due to the network wiring. The network has nothing to do with the DAC's clock. I'm all for you liking one way or the other, personal tastes being personal. But your claim makes zero sense from any technically accurate view. -- Pat Farrell

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Does the Transporter come with rackmount ears?

2010-01-26 Thread Pat Farrell
jtf wrote: looking at buying a Transporter and it said that rackmount ears are available. It didn't say that they actually came in the box. They do not come in the box. Someone more plugged into the retail channel will have to address if they are still available

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter or wait for Touch?

2010-01-26 Thread Pat Farrell
with only one SqueezeBoxen I have not done A/B comparison between my Touch and my TP, but the Touch is very nice. I have a TP, Touch, Boom, Radio, Duet, and have bought and used three plain SqueezeBoxen. So I'm a bit biased. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiophile portable player - with some conditions

2010-01-19 Thread Pat Farrell
. Then you can hear the soft parts without the loud ones damaging your ears. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiophile portable player - with some conditions

2010-01-19 Thread Pat Farrell
formats, or even three if you keep flac, MP3 and audio comppressed version, is not an issue. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Audiophile portable player - with some conditions

2010-01-19 Thread Pat Farrell
cores. Nearly all serious desktops these days are quad, and even most better than netbook laptops are at least dual core. Soon, all desktops will be at least 8 cores. Most of the time, if you use a cron job to make the parallel mp3 tree, you don't care how long it takes. -- Pat Farrell http

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Speaking of marketing flops.. Lexicon rip-off

2010-01-17 Thread Pat Farrell
. It would not surprise me that they accept the fee and the vendor's claims, since testing is actually work. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Simaudio's new 32 bit DAC

2010-01-15 Thread Pat Farrell
sampling makes far more sense. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Simaudio's new 32 bit DAC

2010-01-15 Thread Pat Farrell
with selling it. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Simaudio's new 32 bit DAC

2010-01-15 Thread Pat Farrell
is about 30 second. For every 3 dBs the permissible exposure time before possible damage can occur is cut in half. 118 dB ~ 15 second 121 dB ~ 7 seconds 123 dB ~ 3.5 seconds 126 dB ~ 1.7 seconds See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_range -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Simaudio's new 32 bit DAC

2010-01-15 Thread Pat Farrell
, there is no reason for more than 16 bits of width. Well, one could argue in theory that 18 bits would be a better number, but even 24 bits is wild overkill. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ ___ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >