[Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

Hello Barry fans, A new release just squeaking in for the month of February. This version adds better support for the BlackBerry Pearl, as well as support for password protected devices. An update to the LDAP LDIF code is also included, as well as general bugfixes, such as support of record size

[Barry-devel] Barry-devel now on Gmane

Hi, The barry-devel mailing list has been recently added to the Gmane mailinglist archival site, so Gmane is now one more way of keeping up with Barry news and development discussion. The URL is: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.blackberry.barry.devel Thanks to whoever initiate

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:32:12AM -0800, troy engel wrote: > I had the same problem with btool and CVS as of...looks like Feb. > 24th, whereas an earlier snapshot had been working. I'm afraid I > didn't get time to work on it further (or 0.6) to try and figure out > more, but I can concur that som

[Barry-devel] RPM spec file patch

Hi Troy, Thanks very much for your RPM spec file patch. I'm impressed that root is not needed, according to your patch notes. You seem to have a good handle on the RPM side of things. Would you be willing to create the RPM spec files for the full Barry release? This is something I'd really lik

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:54:16PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > Well, you know -- I try to at least save face first to make sure it > wasn't me doing something really stupid. :) I just happened to have > run out of free time this week. That's understandable. :-) > >Could both you and Miles send me

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:54:16PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > Bus 005 Device 008: ID 0fca:0004 Research In Motion, Ltd. > Device Descriptor: > bLength18 > bDescriptorType 1 > bcdUSB 1.10 > bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) > bDev

Re: [Barry-devel] RPM spec file patch

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:58:20PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > Surely -- when I get time I'll cook it up and submit, it will of > course be a bit more difficult since I'll be playing with the real > Makefiles, but nothing too bad. I've made a few hundred over the > years. ;) I'll try and whip it up

Re: [Barry-devel] RPM spec file patch

On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 12:49:35PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > OK I played around last night and took some notes; the short comment > here is that "btool/bcharge et. al are a no brainer, gui/ creates some > options how to do it". So I'd like to get some feedback on which way > you want to go before

[Barry-devel] udev and console owner permissions

Hi folks, I'm looking at Troy's recent patch for udev permissions, and it sets the ownership of your recently-plugged-in Blackberry to the current console owner. I'm not convinced this is the right approach, but am willing to be convinced. Some reasons I have against it: - it is not por

Re: [Barry-devel] RPM spec file patch

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:47:18PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > (sent using wrong email address, trying a resend. sorry if I break > your email client threading) It worked fine. First of all, Thanks! This is a great benefit, and should make version 0.7 the first release with binary RPM's included

Re: [Barry-devel] udev and console owner permissions

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:11:39PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > Given what I know people do (which, granted is solely from my > experience and contacts) when it comes to a device like a BB they > *will* be logged in as the console user. This device is user-centric, > it will be with the user ("crackb

Re: [Barry-devel] RPM spec file patch

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:58:51PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > I have a CentOS4 system (server parts only) and see that it's even > more dumb than I thought; a new patch is on the way, I made the > initial macro definitions as lowly basic as possible, which makes it a > lot more portable. Basically

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:27:33PM +, Miles Sabin wrote: > I've just tried the latest from CVS (which includes this patch), and I'm > still seeing the hang Troy and I reported last time, although this time > I get, > > Usb::Error caught: Timeout in usb_bulk_read > > on the console after a

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:29:40PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > I still have it sitting here in my ~/tmp, lemme know if you'd like it > again. To my extremely untrained eyes looking at it, it appears there > are two endpoints but you had mentioned a 'pair of endpoints', so... > all this is a foreign

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:49:51PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > Actually I am seeing both pairs of enpoints with a lsusb -v I just did > right now, here's the abbreviated mojo: > >Interface Descriptor: > bNumEndpoints 4 > bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class >

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:40:36PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > If I run it under strace, a little more info: > > open("/dev/bus/usb/005/064", O_RDWR)= 3 > ioctl(3, USBDEVFS_SETCONFIGURATION, 0xbfef2484) = -1 EBUSY (Device or > resource busy) > > That /dev/ entry does exist, it's owned by me (b

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:06:44AM -0800, troy engel wrote: > Yah ok, I dug around -- fuser and friends are all clean, but no matter > what options on the handset I configured (including disabling complete > media card support) it *still* presents itself to the laptop as a USB > storage device; the

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:40:22PM -0500, Chris Frey wrote: > This is good news that Barry doesn't have the problem, but bad news > that it requires a firmware update to fix. Just out of curiosity, does anyone know if RIM releases firmware updates with Changelog files detailing wha

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.6 (alpha) released

On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 06:39:37PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > On 3/11/07, Miles Sabin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > But, OTOH, this was more or less working for you a week or so ago with > > the earlier firmware, right? So even if the newer firmware solves the > > problem there ought to be a f

[Barry-devel] Calling all Pearl users

Hi folks, I need to double check something in the Pearl device numbers, in order to know whether I can rely on the iProduct code to tell me if it is a Pearl or not. So if you could report the following lines from your "lsusb -v" output, that would be most helpful: idVendor 0x0fca Res

[Barry-devel] bcharge update - Pearl mode switching

Hi again, I've updated CVS's copy of bcharge.cc, and reorganized the code to make it possible in theory to switch back and forth between Pearl Product ID modes 0004 and 0001 without unplugging it. I would greatly appreciate any testing you could give it. Thanks, - Chris ---

Re: [Barry-devel] bcharge update - Pearl mode switching

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 08:26:08PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > On 3/16/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would greatly appreciate any testing you could give it. > > CVS 2007-03-16 20:20 PST: > > creating ktrans > if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -

Re: [Barry-devel] bcharge update - Pearl mode switching

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:43:20PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > OK a good compile later and it goes into an endless loop: Whoops! I shouldn't reset if nothing changes. Fixed in CVS. Please try again. :-) If it works properly this time, you should be able to switch between 0001 and 0004 with and

Re: [Barry-devel] Calling all Pearl users

On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 09:43:48AM -0700, troy engel wrote: > Nope, when it's device 0x0006 it's iProduct = 4. From the newest > bcharge (I'll reply in that thread about this), I see: > > idVendor 0x0fca Research In Motion, Ltd. > idProduct 0x0006 > bcdDevice1.

Re: [Barry-devel] Calling all Pearl users

On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:01:01PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > You have to do this manually since the logic loop missing 0x0004 is > missing in older bcharge, so I renamed mine to bcharge.rpm. Starting > from a raw plugin (0x0006) the running ./bcharge.rpm -o, I get: > > idVendor 0x0fca

Re: [Barry-devel] bcharge: cpp vs c

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:55:10PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > (unplug and plug in device) > $ time ./bcharge-c > Scanning for Blackberry devices... > Found device #002...adjusting charge setting...not a Pearl...done > real0m0.003s > user0m0.001s > sys 0m0.002s > > (unplug and plug in d

Re: [Barry-devel] introduction from long-time berry developer

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 06:32:05PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > Hello Barry! I'd just like to introduce myself and see if I can > contribute to this project. I've been developing on the blackberry > since 2001, including the old C++ and new Java APIs. I've also been a > Linux user and develo

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry CVS (bcharge) on Pearl

On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:37:49PM -0400, Jamal wrote: > I'm trying to get bcharge to run on Ubuntu/edgy with a Pearl 8100. I got > it to run correctly but it says that my device is not a pearl. I started > looking through the code and noticed that the constant for > IPRODUCT_RIM_COMPOSITE is se

Re: [Barry-devel] New udev rules for Pearl in .deb

On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:54:50PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that the Pearl is not detected by udev in Debian/testing at the > moment. Attached patch should add the required lines to the udev-rules > (taken from udev/10-blackberry.rules). My apologies for taking so long to res

Re: [Barry-devel] No charging on 8700c

On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 05:53:35PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > In my initial experiments, bcharge doesn't work on the 8700 (which is > the only device I have at my house today). The charge indicator on the > device shows briefly but then disappears. The same charge indicator > blinks on any

Re: [Barry-devel] Calling all Pearl users

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 06:04:02PM -0400, Rick Scott wrote: > I've been quiet on this so far, but good things don't last forever :) > Greg has, or will, submit the power change part for the inclusion in the > kernel, so bcharge may become a non-issue. With a bit of luck, the whole > driver may beco

Re: [Barry-devel] btool LDIF output kinda broken

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:23:12PM -0800, troy engel wrote: > Alas, the space is not fixed. :-/ Using a basic commandline, it looks like: > > # Contact 0x5147561c, Goat Hill Pizza > dn: cn=Goat Hill Pizza ,dc=foo,dc=com > cn: Goat Hill Pizza > > Still a space after 'Goat Hill Pizza ' -- I checked

Re: [Barry-devel] berry_charge.c: kernel module 2.6.21!

Thanks for the heads up. It's cool to see it made it to the kernel. A while back I thought I heard that Greg was talking to some people at RIM... I hope he is able to hammer out some of the Pearl issues. If the driver is in the kernel, I'm sure he'll hear from Pearl users. :-) - Chris On Tue,

[Barry-devel] how to help Barry (was Re: hello)

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:15:07PM -0400, Peter Silva wrote: > Hello, > > I just started lurking a few days ago. I have a BB 8700R for the office. > It is configured to work with the exchange server there. I can play with > berry using my Debian Etch laptop. compiling from CVS is fine, everythi

Re: [Barry-devel] how to help Barry (was Re: hello)

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 11:59:30AM -0700, troy engel wrote: > Hiya Peter -- you can upload patches to the patch manager rather than > sending them out to the list. Either way is fine with me. Whatever people find easiest. :-) - Chris

[Barry-devel] 8800 Pearl, bcharge, and btool

Hi folks, I recently got my hands on a new 8800 Pearl, and tweaked the CVS version of bcharge to work better with the Pearl. The CVS version of bcharge has been broken for a while now, and I believe it is now fixed. There are 3 ways to run bcharge now, with the Pearl: bcharge

Re: [Barry-devel] how to help Barry (was Re: hello)

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:33:40AM -0400, Peter Silva wrote: > I??m fooling around with the packaging. It now installs with proper > udev setup on Debian etch. Debian seems to want us to use the > plugdev group, so did that. The package is also complete (installs > cli tools, lib, include, and

Re: [Barry-devel] task database format document

Thanks very much! I've added your document patch to the doc/ directory. I've also fixed all misspellings of the word recurrence. Oops. :-) Thanks for that, better to catch it now than later. - Chris On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:26:27PM -0400, Peter Silva wrote: >

Re: [Barry-devel] ubuntu feisty, 4.2.0.71 on cingular, timeout issues

On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:38:15PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Note that after a 'bcharge -o' the phone shows the charge symbol for > about 3 secs, then gives up and does not charge. Thanks for your feedback! This is interesting, since below, in your lsusb -v output, you have: > Max

Re: [Barry-devel] ubuntu feisty, 4.2.0.71 on cingular, timeout issues

On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 02:27:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Thanks for the quick reply. If you want me to turn on any more > tracing in the usb_snoop pkg, just let me know. See my responses, > with a new lsusb below. Are you able to: - compile your own kernel? If so, co

[Barry-devel] Barry version 0.7 (alpha) released

Hello Barry Fans, A long overdue version of Barry has finally hit the servers. This version includes RPM binary releases for Barry, including bcharge, btool, and the GUI backup program. Thanks to Troy Engel doing the main work on this. The Debian package rules have been updated for Etch by Pete

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.7 (alpha) released

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:00:39PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > Sweeet. I just installed the three RPMs on a FC6 system that's never Thanks for the report! - Chris - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.7 (alpha) released

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:27:36AM -0500, Jonathan Schneider wrote: > Open mouth insert foot. Was SELINUX (grumble). Fixed...so far so good, > testing PPP soon on FC6. I should warn you, that's not fully functional. Sorry. That command is where it will be implemented, but it's not finished yet

Re: [Barry-devel] FC6 + bcharge 0.7 = usb_storage weirdness

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:49:10PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > With bcharge 0.7 I have trouble getting any USB mounting action; I > removed the RPMs and plugged in the device and it instantly mounted. > Something's fishy in bcharge 0.7, methinks. Could you check if bcharge is running over and over?

Re: [Barry-devel] update record.cc and record.h

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:23:29AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > All, > > I've updated record.h and record.cc based on my 7100g <-> Outlook > combination. I can now parse 275+ records with no unknowns, and I think its > actually pretty accurate ;). Next this is to finish memos and add the ldap

[Barry-devel] What is the equivalent to byteswap.h on Mac OS X?

Hi folks, One user is attempting to build Barry on Mac OS X, and we're running into the problem where byteswap.h does not exist. This provides the following functions that Barry needs for byte order swapping: bswap_16() bswap_32() bswap_64() Anyone know what the equivale

Re: [Barry-devel] What is the equivalent to byteswap.h on Mac OS X?

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:15:00PM -0700, troy engel wrote: > On 5/11/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > bswap_16() > > bswap_32() > > bswap_64() > > I see numerous Google hits that it's GNU non-portable, and indee

Re: [Barry-devel] What is the equivalent to byteswap.h on Mac OS X?

ommit log, which looks > like it defines the functions inline... > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-commit/2007-January/010041.html > > > > On 5/11/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Hi folks, > > > >One user is attemptin

Re: [Barry-devel] FC6 + bcharge 0.7 = usb_storage weirdness

On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 09:58:24AM -0700, troy engel wrote: > I got a chance to mess with it on the same system here, the one 0.6 > worked fine on -- and 0.7 worked just fine as well, the lsusb was > identical save a power control mask. I'll have to mess around with it > more on that other machine

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.7 (alpha) released

On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:23:55PM +0100, Miles Sabin wrote: > I'm delighted to report that this release seems to have solved all my > Pearl problems too ... I don't know what you did, but it works > perfectly now (tho' I still need the rmmod usb-storage). > > Nb. this is without having updated

Re: [Barry-devel] Blackberry Pearl (8100) and bcharge problems

On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:39:30PM -0600, John Anderson wrote: > On 5/13/07, John Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Hey, I have the blackberry pearl (8100) v4.2.0.73 Platform 2.2.0.4 and > >> when I run bcharge -o I get: > >> > >> Scanning for Blackberry devices... > >> Found device #003.

Re: [Barry-devel] sync format for calendar

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:14:02AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > I briefly glanced at how sync works for calendars and it appears that it uses > RFC2445. Since I haven't looked at the details for barry is this correct? If > it is, when I add Class and FreeBusy to the records I'll convert to stri

Re: [Barry-devel] Barry version 0.7 (alpha) released

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 09:46:09AM -0400, raj wrote: > Thanks, I'll try that.. > > Meanwhile, on my desktop at work (fc6, 2.6.20-1.2948.fc6) - bcharge and > mass storage seem to work fine together.. I have the barry-util 0.7 rpm > installed, working on the -gui dependencies next. Troy is corre

[Barry-devel] [patch] berry_charge.c updated with Blackberry Pearl support, and other bugfixes

Hi, Below is a patch with the following changes to the berry_charge.c module: 1) kzalloc() is called, but memory is never freed Is this a memory leak? I'm not sure, but the buffer is only a dummy buffer to hold return data that is never used, so I suspect a stack variabl

Re: [Barry-devel] Blackberry Pearl (8100) and bcharge problems

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:56:00PM -0600, John Anderson wrote: > It doesn't charge and I was mistaken when I said btool finds it, btool > crashes with Usb:Error caught: Timeout in usb_bulk_reader I just got another report today of similar behaviour... hopefully I can test the device in person tomo

Re: [Barry-devel] Patch for Calendar and a little for Contact I missed

On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 05:58:11AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > Here is a patch to add FreeBusy and Class information to Calendar and add > some > of the clear() I missed in Contact. Thanks very much for your work on this. Some comments: > +/// > +/// Free Busy Flag > +/// > +

Re: [Barry-devel] Source of value for GetDefaultRecType() (in record.h)

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:19:25PM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > Where does this value come from? I can't see any real correlation between it > and any of the other information that gets dumped. You'll notice that each database-oriented class in record.h has a field called RecType, a uint8_t. T

Re: [Barry-devel] Patch for Calendar and a little for Contact I missed

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 08:00:18PM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > Sounds good. I struggled with this and probably moved them in and out of the > code a half dozen times. I think what finally made me pull them was the fact > that the ordering I was seeing didn't seem to follow my interpretation of

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] berry_charge.c updated with Blackberry Pearl support, and other bugfixes

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:20:51AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > 1) kzalloc() is called, but memory is never freed > > > > Is this a memory leak? I'm not sure, but the buffer is only > > a dummy buffer to hold return data that is never used, > > so I suspect a stack variable will suffi

Re: [Barry-devel] Blackberry Pearl (8100) and bcharge problems

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:55:17AM -0600, John Anderson wrote: > and for the uname -a > > Linux Inspidell 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 > GNU/Linux This seems to be a common item in this bug report. I saw this happen on a non-Pearl device, in person today, and it was

Re: [Barry-devel] Blackberry Pearl (8100) and bcharge problems

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:11:10PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > People report on the Ubuntu forums that it worked fine in edgy, > stopped working in fiesty, and then starts working (sometimes > only occasionally) in gutsy. That's "feisty" of course... better spell it correct

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] preliminary record refactoring patch

Hi Brian, I spent some time today splitting the records classes into separate files, just haven't committed it yet. Do you have a compile error that this patch fixes? It looks like it mainly changes the name from Record to RecordT. - Chris On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:14:23PM -0600, Brian Edgin

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] preliminary record refactoring patch

revious emails, you have a bunch of record parsing classes waiting to send, and I haven't been working on any of that side lately, so we're at least not duplicating work there. Thanks, - Chris On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:21:53PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I sp

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] preliminary record refactoring patch

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:34:51AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > > The hierarchy I've done before had virtual operator=() functions, which > > is probably most of the reason why it was so much work (you could > > copy any object correctly, even through a base pointer). But I still > > favour simp

Re: [Barry-devel] Fedora RPM conflict

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:30:10AM -0700, troy engel wrote: > On 5/25/07, Miles Sabin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just FYI, but the surfraw package in Fedora extras provides > > a /usr/bin/translate binary which conflicts with the one provided by > > barry-util. > > Personally I wouldn't sweat

Re: [Barry-devel] question on makefile/directory

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:40:45AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > What is the purpose for running the following Make rule and creating the > symlink barry? > > all-local: >rm -f barry >ln -s src barry It is so that when compiling the tools/ and examples/ directory, that code can

Re: [Barry-devel] updated memo and task patch

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:29:59AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > I've updated the pending memo and task patch (record.h and record.cc) to > include some of the information in Peter Silva's bb_task_format.txt. I'm going to rework these memo and task patches into separate files and apply them that

Re: [Barry-devel] updated memo and task patch

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:49:16PM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > > I'm going to rework these memo and task patches into separate files > > and apply them that way. > > Or I can once I see how you break out Contact and Messages. I've added Memo and Task classes, in separate files, based on your u

[Barry-devel] CVS commit policy

Hi folks, For those of you sending patches, this is probably good to know: In order to track copyrights properly, so I can go back in the history and see who sent what patch, I try, whenever possible, to commit the *exact* patch I receive, even if it temporarily breaks the tree, or if there are t

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch]

On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 05:01:38AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > Adds Tasks and Memos and some updates to Messages and Contacs to s11n-boost.h. Applied! Thanks! - Chris - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Down

Re: [Barry-devel] plugin compilation

On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:43:34PM +0100, Jacek Nykis wrote: > barry_sync.cc:28:39: error: opensync/opensync-context.h: No such file or > directory It appears you're compiling the CVS tree. If so, you need to use the latest SVN sources from the OpenSync project. Also, the CVS tree is in the mid

Re: [Barry-devel] plugin compilation

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:12:58PM +0100, Jacek Nykis wrote: > Thanks for answer. > I have just tried with SVN version of opensync and I get: [compiler errors] Yes, OpenSync went through some significant API changes between 0.2x and 0.30, and CVS is not fully ported to that yet. Sorry if I was un

Re: [Barry-devel] Blackberry Pearl (8100) and bcharge problems

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:42:35PM -0600, John Anderson wrote: > >> and for the uname -a > >> > >> Linux Inspidell 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 > >i686 > >> GNU/Linux > > I compiled my kernel and everything worked perfectly, Did you ever find out > what the issue with the

Re: [Barry-devel] Kernel Issue with Fedora7

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:04:11AM -0600, John Anderson wrote: > The kernel issue that is with Ubuntu Feisty is now present in Fedora 7, has > anyone solved this issue? > > -- The issue I'm talking about is where you bcharge -o and then it doesn't > charge. Not yet, unfortunately. You mentioned

Re: [Barry-devel] MemoPad & Tasks + newbie = ?

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:46:49PM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > I am mostly an end user. I have an 8100 and run Feisty and Debian > Testing. > > I don't need to sync, although it would be nice. What I want is to use > Barry to download my "writings" from the 8100 onto my computer - if a > s

Re: [Barry-devel] MemoPad & Tasks + newbie = ?

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:00:17PM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > I am sure there is a simple idea I am missing but when I issue > ~/barry/tools/btool -t > > Blackberry devices found: > No device selected > > The 8100 is connected but no matter if I choose "Mass Storage Mode" or > select "No" t

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] Adds PIN Message

On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:10:27AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > Here is a patch to add PIN Message and add some additional fields to Message. Thanks! I've applied it, as the bulk of it is just fine. I'm going through it more closely fixing small things. > Note that I had to make a change to

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] Adds PIN Message

In the patch: + // handle special cases + switch( field->type ) + { + case PNMFC_RECORDID: + MessageRecordId = field->u.min1900; // not really time, but we +need easy access to an int + return begin; + } Don't be afraid to add fields or

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] Adds PIN Message

On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:29:30PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > In the PINMessage class, you have a MessageRecordId. What does this number > represent? Is it the same as the value passed in to the SetIds() call? > > I should do some more experiments here, but thought I'd ask i

Re: [Barry-devel] MemoPad & Tasks + newbie = ? - take 2

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:15:11PM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > Can I somehow import my Evolution 2.10.1 contacts into my BlackBerry > (Pearl) 8100? > > I converted the address book in the Pearl to LDIF output and manually > imported it into Evolution. I found a perl script on line > (http://w

Re: [Barry-devel] MemoPad & Tasks + newbie = ? - take 2

On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 08:35:41PM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > I converted my contacts in Evolution to ldif using vcf2ldif > ( http://mills.zapto.org/projects/vcf2ldif/ ). > I am unfortunately stuck at using upldif. Cool, I didn't know such a tool existed. > 1. How can I use upldif, now

Re: [Barry-devel] MemoPad & Tasks + newbie = ? - take 2

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:12:19AM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > I downloaded BOOST via CVS but it looks really challenging to build. If you're going to build Boost from sources, grab their tarball. This is how I build version 1.33: (cd tools/build/jam_src && ./build.sh gcc) mk

Re: [Barry-devel] MemoPad & Tasks + newbie = ? - take 2

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:34:53PM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > Letting --with-boost=/usr fails. Are you sure? This is the make output for btool from your log, and it looks right: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/yigal/bb/barry/tools' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..-D__BARRY_BOOST_MODE__ -

Re: [Barry-devel] [PATCH] Compiling barry on Debian - libtar-dev missing

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hello, > > seems barry (gui?) needs libtar-dev for creating the Debian packages. > Here's the patch which adds this to the Build-Depends. Applied. Thanks! - Chris --

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] Saved Email Messages patch

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:29:25PM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > This adds Saved Email Messages and actually has the patch attached (duh). Applied, thanks! One of these days we'll need to refactor some of that message parsing code. It's ok for now though. - Chris ---

Re: [Barry-devel] bcharge dependency errors...

root,root) %{_datadir}/opensync/defaults/* %doc COPYING %endif %clean [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ] && %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} [ "%{barryroot}" != "/" ] && %{__rm} -rf %{barryroot} %post -n libbarry /sbin/ldconfig %postun -n libbarry /sbin/ldconfig %cha

Re: [Barry-devel] bcharge dependency errors...

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:44:17AM -0600, Mitchell Sherfey wrote: > Dude! You rock! I will try this this afternoon. Thank you very much. If you run through that process, you'll have a system that is capable of compiling the CVS tree someday (you'd need to install autoconf and automake), which wo

Re: [Barry-devel] Restore error

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 03:54:46PM -0600, Brad Bartholomew wrote: > Here is more information on the restore error. Anyone have thoughts as > to why it would have problems erasing a database? Is there a config > setting on the blackberry that would prevent a database from being > erased?? I'm ass

[Barry-devel] Possible solution to charge icon on recent kernels (was: Fw: [PATCH] Don't autosuspend Blackberry devices.)

Hi Jeremy, I saw this patch posted to the linux-usb-devel list, and while it seems it was rejected on the grounds that it should be done in udev, it looks like this could be the general solution to the problem we've been seeing with recent kernels, and bcharge. If you cook up a udev solution for

Re: [Barry-devel] Restore error

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:21:48AM -0600, Brad Bartholomew wrote: > Yes, I am using the Barry Backup GUI. > > My device is under control of a BES system. Since that is the case, > is there a way to not have it erase the database and just add to it? > Or is there a way to temporarily unassociate

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] fix for bugtracker 1673614

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 04:51:07AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > Here is a patch to configure.ac that fixes bug 1673614. Appled, thanks! - Chris - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] message header patch

On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 06:43:07AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > So, after crashing my hard drive and recreating all this info from notes > (backup!, backup!, backup!), here is a patch to the message databases to > parse out some of the information stored in the header, i.e. flags, priority, >

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] r_folder.patch

On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 10:54:13AM -0600, Brian Edginton wrote: > Here is a patch to include the "Folders" database. I hacked it up for > debugging the Messages header stuff, but it is a good starting place for > someone who wants to write a BB desktop for linux. Applied, thanks! - Chris ---

Re: [Barry-devel] explore the filesystem / ssh client

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 02:54:08PM -0400, Mark Leddy wrote: > I just downloaded today, I am running FC7. > > I too am seeing the charge light come on then go off, and I was only able to > find the device once. > Tried both the dev 0.7 and from cvs, I didn't do the RPM spec thing . According to t

Re: [Barry-devel] udev Debian (possibly Ubuntu)?

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:09:18PM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > I am so newbish that No matter what I do, I am thinking the wrong thoughts > etc.. However, I have found that if udev is down bcharge works > perfectly and when udev is working "#($)bcharge -{o,d,}" fails (Note {o,d,} > one > at

Re: [Barry-devel] strange behaviour under ubuntu feisty

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 01:45:20PM +0200, Dominik Feser wrote: > hi list! > i'm watching the barry project since a few weeks now. very interesting > things are happening here! Welcome aboard! > i tried to compile the whole thing and this worked. but i have some > problems because bcharge keeps m

Re: [Barry-devel] install issues in Ubuntu Fiesty

Welcome to Barry! On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:54:28PM -0600, Will Smith wrote: > I tried to install on Ubuntu Fiesty Fawn and everything went OK. but when I > plug in my device and try and run btool, it says that no device is found. > When I put in my PIN it says that there is no device by that pi

Re: [Barry-devel] udev Debian (possibly Ubuntu)?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:29:37PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There seems to be no kernel module berry_charge in 2.6.22? I attempted > to manually load this module using modprobe but modprone did not find > the module. Perhaps I must reconfigure the kernel. [EMAIL PROTECTED] tar tjvf linux

Re: [Barry-devel] blackberry emails

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:12:46PM -0700, Yigal Weinstein wrote: > This is really quite funny. I just sent an email for the 2nd time using > my BlackBerry 8100 - Pearl - and Sourceforge fails to decipher it on the > web interface. What the heck is going on. Perhaps I need to turn off some > fea

[Barry-devel] crashing Blackberries with udev and bcharge

Well, this email is about how *not* to crash them. :-) It seems that running multiple back-to-back instances of bcharge can cause some Blackberries to reboot themselves. And this is exactly what the current udev rules do, by running bcharge for every USB endpoint it finds. If you are experiencin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >