e why you disagree with the
implication. All PROVE-IT really demonstrated was
that Lipitor is better at doing something that _we
already knew statins do_ - save lives.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
___
r brain and is able to
differentiate between advertising and medical advice.
You can do it after all. I mean, you haven't gone to
your doctor for medicine for Social Anxiety Disorder
(unless you have it, of course), right? So why do you
think that other people can't?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[
id poorly in the study_.
Pfizer did not pay for PROVE-IT. BMS did. I have
helped design drug company clinical trial strategies,
and we don't rig them. Personally, Debbi, I'd prefer
taking a pill every day than the sort of
nanny-stateism that has the government dictating what
I eat ev
cal community. PROVE-IT was a
triumph for American medicine. The next time someone
tells you about dishonest drug companies, ask yourself
this. When was the last time a company designed a
test that proved its own products inferior and the
whole thing was still sent out to the public?
=
Gautam
he above. Freedom may not offer any
assurance that the press will report reality. Freedom
does, however, offer us the assurance that it will get
closer than anything else.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
_
-drezner/the-outsourcing-bogeyman.html
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/f
ot be as low as they seem.
They are often thought of as real interest rates -
the interest rate minus the inflation rate. Given the
extremely low inflation rate, real interest rates
aren't (I believe) at historically low levels.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTEC
the Nazis?" I don't see
Bush doing that yet...
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
--- "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 05:30 PM 3/17/2004 -0800 Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> >What do you mean by needs?
>
> I mean that if we were suddenly to get rid of the
> millions of illegal
> workers in the country, we would have a very
&
at's
certainly true. But the type of immigrant is at least
as important as the number of immigrants. An
economically and socially ideal immigration policy, it
seems to me, would look a lot different from what we
currently have.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED
hoose to
embody all the worst stereotypes of European cowardice
and fecklessness I have no idea but hey, there you go.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo
Edward Luttwak, an opponent of the Iraq war and an
accomplished scholar of international security, wrote
in the New York Times today on what happened in Spain.
It's worth reading.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/16/opinion/16LUTT.html
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom i
though he would have much better grounds to do so_.
That, even more than the importance and frequency
with which Democrats are making that claim, is what
makes their behavior far worse.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogs
second, when did he say it? Was it after the
"Baghdad Two" went off on their little junket?
Because if it was, then he was, you know, _right_.
Isn't that kind of a problem for your argument?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.bl
s. Al Gore claimed that
the President betrayed his country. John Kerry
claimed that all Republicans - and from the context
it's clear that he was talking about Republicans in
general - were crooks. You _don't see_ Republicans of
equal stature doing anything like that, and the
stature of the p
).
>
> Doug
I do know who Alex Castellanos is, and the bureaucRATS
thing is a proof of how desperate you are to find
something. Because, of course, that whole thing was
made up - a fictional tempest in a teapot over a
non-existent event created by a media desperate to
find something or any
tant Democratic Congressmen who _did_,
by most definitions, do exactly that. The
accusation's a lot more credible if it's, well, true.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you
gt; war of conquest.
In fact, I believe that Baghdad will be renamed George
Bush City next week, if my secret memo from the Vast
Right-Wing Conspiracy is correct.
I believe that my personal profit-sharing as a junior
member of the VRWC from the oil revenues comes to
$42.03, in fact.
=
ike this. He
might even agree.
I would also say, by the way - could you find a quote
from Bush or Cheney saying such things about their
opponents? You most certainly could not. Anyone who
has the gall to claim that Bush is questioning
people's patriotism or running a mean-spirited
campaign damn
ewish people. Well, by that definition I
am a Zionist, and I'm proud of that fact.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.y
pact than their pure numbers would imply.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
__
thought the war
shouldn't happen was okay, as long as you agreed on that?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.ya
Well, the attacks seem pretty clearly to have been
launched to achieve exactly this result.
1. Terrorists attack to get a certain result
2. Terrorists get the result that they want
I think that meets most reasonable definitions of a
victory for terrorists.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECT
Baseball Prospectus just published a freely-available
article on the state of what we know about clutch
hitting. Given the occasional discussions on the
topic on list, I thought people might find it
interesting.
http://premium.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2656
=
Gautam
top of the market. I further argue that this is a
bad thing, but I don't think you disagree with that
point of my argument. Where in that chain of
reasoning do you depart from me?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
's
a real danger in his program of creating a permanent
class of guest workers - exactly the program that the
Europeans have tried and that has failed miserably for them.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
___
thought, oh, the M-1
tank was a bad idea. That doesn't make it a violation
of your rights that the government built M-1s. It
might make it bad policy (although it was, in fact,
very good policy). But that's different from your
rights. The Constitution does not mean that you get
many times stated
your belief that conservatives actually _want_ to
increase that in the US, this poses you something of a problem.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sea
appropriating funds from the general budget to run ads
on its own behalf. I assume that is not okay with you?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do
--- Damon Agretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As someone who has served in the Army, this whole
> statement is more amusing than it should be...
>
> Damon "nothing says authority like 700 STEEL
> BALLS!!!"
Remember "Front towards enemy" :-)
=
Gau
Which is, of course, exactly what
happened. Furthermore, the large number of illegal
immigrants - people willing to work, effectively, for
below the minimum wage - creates a further downward
pull on low-skilled workers incomes, further
exacerbating the income inequality problem.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[
ployers - largely from low-skilled, low-wage
employees who have seen their wages driven down
relatively to employers.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you
penny if Halliburton goes into
bankruptcy or it becomes the most profitable
corporation in the world. One wonders how this could
then affect his decisions.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
D
want
to have a very high degree of confidence in these
companies before you award them a contract, and you
can only get that confidence by knowing them for a
prolonged period of time.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
but the average Hispanic is not. This is a
classic example of the principal-agent problem,
actually, because the interests of Hispanic leaders
(whose power is increased the more Hispanics there are
in the country) clearly conflict with the interests of
Hispanics in general (whose economic well-bei
ple) is indirectly going to
speech. But NPR money is direct. So it's coerced
speech. That's something that you, of all people on
the list, should be most opposed to.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
_
--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:23:00PM -0800, Gautam
> Mukunda wrote:
>
> > It's plausible. It _may_ even be true. The other
> big difference
> > between the European and American economies,
> though, is mass
> &g
everyone to give benefits to the
wealthy.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
_
ers of the United States civil service who work to
the best of their ability to award such contracts
fairly. Anyone who knows the government procurement
system (as I do) knows that it isn't even possible to
rig the bidding if you want to.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
ven have a right to be dishonest about it
(sort of). You do _not_ have a right to do it with
_my tax dollars_. Your opinions can't make it on
their own? That is not my problem. You don't have
the right to take money from me by force to support
_your_ opinions.
=
rder. The hijackers were able to
die, but not, I think, with courage.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search.ya
s in the US down, and creates a pool
of poor in the US who have no equivalent in Europe,
increasing inequality in two ways. It's at least
possible that the US could maintain higher economic
growth than Europe _and_ equivalent differences in
income without that factor. Or it might not - but
cert
A pretty classic example...
http://slingsnarrows.erudite-absurdity.com/archive/001447.html
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for f
--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:07:44PM -0800, Gautam
> Mukunda wrote:
>
> > But it's not a real parallel, because Halliburton
> wins those contracts
> > on a free market basis.
>
> I think he has a point, Gautam.
otections that you are claiming that they do (and in
the rare circumstances when they do, it's a very bad
idea, the product of political pressures that do a
great deal of harm to the United States as a whole).
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://
rton (a profitable corporation),
it's Halliburton's money, to do with as its
shareholders choose. NPR has no shareholders. It is
a creation of the government, not a private entity.
The rules for private and public entities are very
different, and NPR is a private entity.
=
Gautam Mu
r corporations to do that.
Unions, _as long as they operate under the open shop_,
can do so as well (closed shop unions are a different
situation). But I don't have a choice about my taxes.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.co
deral funding that
engage in political speech - although this is
something that should be viewed with _extreme_ caution
- but NPR crosses way over the line.
Note that PBS, which is still liberally biased but not
nearly as bad as NPR, doesn't draw my fire in the same way.
t;
>
> Dan M.
Note that it could be 50 cents, and I would still
think it's unconscionable, but I _believe_ that this
is a fudge on their part. Not a lie, per se, but I
think that some fairly substantial fractions of the
pie are "indirect" federal funding - money from local
ch is a violation of
the most fundamental principles of the United States.
It is ironic and revelatory that people who think
preventing flag burning is an atrocity are fine with NPR.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
_
- the
sheerest violation of the First Amendment.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
___
fund, but it
doesn't really matter to me. Nor does the percentage
matter (I believe it's around 40%, but say that with
no confidence). It's the principal of the thing. The
fact that _my tax dollars_ go to fund leftist
propaganda is an outrage. It's coerced speech - the
sh
taken by threat of force. And NPR
pretends to be unbiased, when it is in fact sheerest
partisan hackery most of the time. That's the
difference. Everything else is unimportant.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
_
ever
> else it may be, India is not the Singularity.
>
> Rich
Well, sort of. But it's already happened to
secretaries, right? That's what voicemail/PIMs has
done to that job. It's happened to a lot of
manufacturing jobs - that's what automation has done.
There'
ic way that calling the
> 911 terrorists cowards was inaccurate. He did not
> call them heros but no reasonable defintion of
> coward applies to those lunatics
True as far as it goes, but I believe that he called
_American_ soldiers cowards instead. That was not
exactly okay.
=
Gaut
shoring to India different _in its effects_ from
that invention?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
http://search
t if
they weren't going to Indians - that is, if they were
disappearing because of technology, or, on a darker
note, if they were going to Germans, say - there would
be no attention paid to it at all.
One other point. The _US_ is a primary offshoring
location. Every Japanese car factory in
you'd be honest about it if you admitted that you
already had one - it's called NPR - paid for with my
tax dollars. If you want to waste _your_ money on
such a thing, be my guest.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
_
nda
> >on the American public.
>
> You mean, moreso than making money?
>
> JDG
Now, now, John, you know that arguing with the
paranoid school of American politics is a lost cause...
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.c
ion troops passing through
Baltimore in an attempt to reinforce Washington in the
early days of the war. Everything about it is just atrocious.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yaho
es tax).
Or, of course, to shift the tax burden from investment
to consumption...
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looki
_ be a racist. That was, I think, pretty much
the default position in the North, actually. So it
really isn't that surprising that after the war and
abolition the North didn't make the efforts that it
should have to promote equality.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not
long time.
What do you think, robb? I'd be interested in hearing
your take on Foner and the historical dispute.
Gautam
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y
r the cultural
too much (about which I could be entirely wrong) I
don't know. I know I've read _something_ by Dunning,
but for the life of me I can't think what it was.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blog
e an important lesson for liberals
who feel that we should be flexible in interpreting
the Constitution. Not all change is progress. Civil
rights got _worse_ between 1877 and the 1920s or so,
not better.
So it seems a bit unfair that the "Radical
Republicans" are still vilified as r
ere a technological invention
that allowed you to use, say, 50% fewer American
programmers, would you have the government legislate
against it? If so, why did you not support (say) such
legislation against the roboticization of American
factories? If not, how is that different from sending
progra
could say that
the American Civil War was a product of technological
change, actually. Without the cotton gin, slavery
would probably have been economically unsupportable,
and the South might have been willing to agree to
compensated emancipation, or something like that, anyways.
=
Gautam Mukund
Civil
War. Gettysburg was the largest. Shiloh was the
worst at its time - unprecedentedly bad. It is
perhaps a sign of how incredibly bloody the Civil War
became that it would be surpassed over and over and
over again by the time the war was done.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTE
st _urban_ President from a
poor family? I don't know - can't think of who it
might be. Nixon is the first to spring to mind, but
there surely must have been others before that.
Anyone else on the list have an idea?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freed
like to study some
day). _But_. One reason the British were under less
economic pressure to intervene than they might have
been was record cotton crops in India and Egypt. Had
the climate been less favorable, the economic pressure
for Britain to intervene would have been much higher.
Luck once
lower middle class at best, and
Reagan's family was _poor_.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! M
my opinion) would
have settled for no less than the absolute censorship
of any anti-slavery views expressed anywhere in
America (something that was already the case in the
South) and quite possibly the extension of slavery
over the whole country (see Dred Scott). The North
would never accept eithe
t book I've read on this topic (in part) is
_America's Constitutional Soul_, a collection of
essays by Harvey Mansfield. Unfortunately it's
written with Mansfield's usual elegant but opaque
style, so I found that I had to read every paragraph
at least three times bef
s victory in the war made further
democratic reforms in Britain possible, and without
that victory they would not have happened. So not
only did the North's victory assure the survival of
American democracy - it had a pretty important impact
on the development of _British_ democracy as well.
=
mind that had Seward or Chase
been President of the United States, the North would
have lost the war in short order.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spa
again. Why did they
(finally) find the generals (Grant and Sherman) who
understood the war (not just tactics, but the war
itself) and what it took to win it? Lincoln. And
what are the odds of that?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
you understand?
It is _all our soil_.")
All of that just for starters. There's much more.
It's a fascinating topic that I have only begun to
scratch the surface of, and every President and
Defense Secretary (in my opinion) should be required
to study it before taking office in order to
ong many) of the
Civil War that perhaps the single most important
reason for the South's defeat - the genius of Abraham
Lincoln - could _only_ be utilized in the meritocratic
North, where a dirt-poor farm boy had the chance to
rise to the Presidency, something that would have been
inconceivable i
..state's rights. So while I think it was fair
to look with suspicion at people who made the claim
that they were important in the 1950s, or even the
1970s, I don't think it would be fair to do so today.
Had the claim of state's rights _always_ been about
race, it would b
ated_. I
can't speak for John, but I think it's unfair to state
as a blanket that he supports activism that he agrees
with and opposes activism that he disagrees with
without probing to see if there's a judicial
philosophy underlying those positions that makes them
consistent, i
niquely tolerant of homosexuality (as with most other things).
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the
ing to do about it? Better that they have the bare
minimum, with disagreements engaged in the
legislature, where people can decide on things and
accept the legitimacy of the decisions, not have them
made for them by the arbitrary and unrestricted power
of an appointed elite that has little or no
wasn't by much. The point is that
each of the three has _different_ powers, which act as
a check upon each other. It's the difference in the
nature of their powers that is crucial. The problem
with Rehnquist is that he has aggressively usurped
executive and (even more) le
p some more
articles on the topic when I get a chance. But
conservative judicial usurpation is no better - and
sometimes worse - than its liberal counterpart, and I
_must_ to oppose the one if I oppose the other.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.
y contrast, was
a model of judicial deference to the legislative
branch. The rot began with Burger, but it's Rehnquist
who has done the most damage. We certainly shouldn't
be amending the oldest governing document in history,
the blueprint of the most successful government in the
entire hi
of warning. Mark Prior was the most-abused
pitcher in the Majors last year. He has the best
mechanics of any pitcher of his age ever recorded, so
if anyone can survive that, he can. Nonetheless, that
would be my major concern if I were a Cubs fan.
=
Gautam Muk
ter http://www.erikreuter.net/
My theory has always been that The Fool is Howard
Dean, actually...
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Rea
and one of my professors in college
actually used it in a lecture - only to come back to
us next week and tell us that he was incorrect, that
this fact was not true.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
___
e sex
scandals and Republicans have money scandals, and I
don't really care about money, shouldn't I be a
Democrat? His answer was "Republicans have better
booze and better-looking women. That's all you need
to know."
Not sure if he was _right_, but that seems like a
n-in-fur, 3
> surrogate children-on-the-hoof...
>
> Debbi
Single as well. One of my best friends (gay) once
described me as "the straightest human being who has
ever lived." I don't think he meant it as a
compliment, but he's probably right :-)
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EM
ily aware of who edits The Nation? No,
not at all - but the tenor that they create is
perceived by the very perceptive American public.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Fin
--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 02:17:39PM -0800, Gautam
> Mukunda wrote:
> Not always. Some taxes provide services that
> increase freedom. For
> example, taxes that support schools that provide a
> good education
> for anyone, re
t that's the
equivalent of what you're doing to people who support
the PATRIOT Act. I'm willing to acknowledge that
reasonable people can differ on such opinions.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
ht
iable truths
- that regime change was a goal of the US government
before the Bush Administration (again, something that
we were legally committed to by a vote of Congress and
by many public statements from the Clinton
Administration) and that there was only one way to do
it (invading Iraq) - is why
e fence.
Before the Vietnam War that wasn't true. Today,
Michael Walzer rights essays asking if it is even
_possible_ for there to be a decent Left, and his
answer appears to be yes, but it doesn't exist right
now. If the editor of _Dissent_ is saying that, then
there is a problem, an
ted.
American conservatives are a lot of things. Many of
them are not particularly admirable. But I've never
met an American conservative who didn't _like_
Americans, and I've never met one who didn't respect
the extraordinary wisdom of the American public. The
question I would p
ite a few things as well, I
think. They just have a lower level of political
salience right now, so they don't come up in political
discussion much.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
tart. If John ever did the same
(and I don't think he ever would, because he's a _lot_
more polite than the people on this list who abuse him
constantly and then whine and whimper when he snaps
back) I'd call him on it.
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not
r why I'm
a conservative. But I can always rely on you to
remind me...
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by fili
u in any position to tell me that. Displacement
sound familiar to you, Doctor Z?
=
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http
501 - 600 of 1135 matches
Mail list logo
