- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: WTC Redux
Matthew and Julie Bos wrote:
On 7/19/06 11:47 AM, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the strength of your
Reggie Bautista wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: WTC Redux
Matthew and Julie Bos wrote:
On 7/19/06 11:47 AM, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Subject: Re: WTC Redux
On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 15/07/2006, at 10:44 PM, Dave Land wrote:
So /you're/ Gautam's liberal-democrat-female friend? Since you
presumed
to answer the questions I wrote to Dan for her, you must want
us to
think so.
Uh-huh. Yes, I'm clearly
On 7/19/06 11:47 AM, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the strength of your reasoning (as well as recent views of myself
in a mirror), I concede the point that I am nowhere /near/ as hot as
Sigourney Weaver, who would be significantly hotter regardless of
her mode of dress.
You may be
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Matthew and Julie Bos wrote:
On 7/19/06 11:47 AM, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the strength of your reasoning (as well as recent views of myself
in a mirror), I concede the point that I am nowhere /near/ as hot as
Sigourney Weaver, who would be
Matthew and Julie Bos wrote:
On 7/19/06 11:47 AM, Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the strength of your reasoning (as well as recent views of myself
in a mirror), I concede the point that I am nowhere /near/ as hot as
Sigourney Weaver, who would be significantly hotter regardless of
her
The question I'd love to see asked is are there really other videos
of the crash at the Pentagon? There are so many conspiracy sites
that talk about a surveillance video from a gas station across the
street. Do they really exist?
I don't know if this person would or would not have any
On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 15/07/2006, at 10:44 PM, Dave Land wrote:
So /you're/ Gautam's liberal-democrat-female friend? Since you
presumed
to answer the questions I wrote to Dan for her, you must want us to
think so.
Uh-huh. Yes, I'm clearly impersonating
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Land
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:58 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: WTC Redux
On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 15/07/2006, at 10:44 PM, Dave Land wrote
Dan Minette wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Land
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:58 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: WTC Redux
On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 15/07/2006, at 10:44 PM, Dave Land
Dave Land wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Land
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:58 PM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: WTC Redux
On Jul 15, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Charlie
Julia Thompson wrote:
Robert Seeberger wrote:
I hypothesize that the damage to the outer ring caused load
shifting,
with the inner core acting as a fulcrum. On the other parts of the
affected floor compressive forces became [the opposite of
compressive] forces or torsive forces beyond the
Excellent.
I welcome this opportunity.
Apologies for my own intermittent involvement on this. I don't mean to
throw argument bombs into the room and then exit - I just don't have
the spare cycles to weigh in as often as I would like, yet.
Mr Bell, if selective bloviating was enough then
On 16/07/2006, at 5:03 PM, Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Mr Bell, if selective bloviating was enough then this would be
resolved already. Your growling impatient diatribe doesn't appear
to add anything and I certainly resist bully-boy tactics even if
only verbal.
Like, um, I think we've
Gibson Jonathan wrote:
Excellent.
I welcome this opportunity.
Apologies for my own intermittent involvement on this. I don't mean
to throw argument bombs into the room and then exit - I just don't
have the spare cycles to weigh in as often as I would like, yet.
Understandable.
Mr Bell,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gibson Jonathan
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 9:04 AM
To: Killer Bs Discussion
Subject: Re: WTC Redux
Excellent.
I welcome this opportunity.
Apologies for my own intermittent involvement
On 16/07/2006, at 10:51 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
Using the same calculations, tower 2, the first to fall, would
collapse in
9.5 sec. Both of these numbers are consistent with the times
observed.
Bingo. Your Math-Fu is strong.
Finally, I'm trying to incorporate your questions, Charlie's
I'm perfectly happy to discuss my view, or whatever, further, if
you think it would help. Although, to be honest, I think your view,
Dan, and mine are close enough on all the details we've actually
thought about and discussed that I'd be perfectly happy for you to
substitute your own for
On 16/07/2006, at 11:16 PM, Dan Minette wrote:
Thank you. What I was thinking of was your view that there was a good
question to be asked about the WT7 collapse, but that Dave's
wording didn't
present it. I was sorta fishing for you to present what you
thought was a
good question when I
Robert Seeberger wrote:
Isn't Stockholm a form of PTSD?
I don't see why both propositions could not be true. I am sure there
are limitations to the applicability of such disorders, so it is a
matter of degree coupled with propensity.
Some poking around leads me to believe that no, they are
Robert Seeberger wrote:
I hypothesize that the damage to the outer ring caused load shifting,
with the inner core acting as a fulcrum. On the other parts of the
affected floor compressive forces became [the opposite of compressive]
forces or torsive forces beyond the rating of bolts and
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 14/07/2006, at 11:31 PM, Dave Land wrote:
For me, questions that compare the official report's explanation
of the
attack and its aftermath with the major common elements of the top
couple of conspiracy theories (how is it that WTC 1 2
On 15/07/2006, at 10:44 PM, Dave Land wrote:
So /you're/ Gautam's liberal-democrat-female friend? Since you
presumed
to answer the questions I wrote to Dan for her, you must want us to
think so.
Uh-huh. Yes, I'm clearly impersonating Gautam's friend.
Or maybe I'm pointing out problems
Dear All,
I IM'd with Gautam, and he said he'd be willing to ask a couple of questions
concerning 9-11 and the conspiracy theories of his friend who worked on the
report. But, he won't pepper her with a laundry list of questions, she's
rather sick of the various conspiracy theories.
As I
At 10:34 AM Friday 7/14/2006, Dan Minette wrote:
Dear All,
I IM'd with Gautam, and he said he'd be willing to ask a couple of questions
concerning 9-11 and the conspiracy theories of his friend who worked on the
report. But, he won't pepper her with a laundry list of questions, she's
rather
On Jul 14, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Dan Minette wrote:
Dear All,
I IM'd with Gautam, and he said he'd be willing to ask a couple of
questions concerning 9-11 and the conspiracy theories of his friend
who
worked on the report. But, he won't pepper her with a laundry list of
questions, she's rather
On 14/07/2006, at 11:31 PM, Dave Land wrote:
For me, questions that compare the official report's explanation of
the
attack and its aftermath with the major common elements of the top
couple of conspiracy theories (how is it that WTC 1 2 fell at very
near free-fall-in-a-vacuum speeds;
27 matches
Mail list logo
