Dear Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you for proposing these new carbon and nitrogen standard names for PMIP
and for the discussion. I think these proposals are looking good and I have
accepted many of them. I do have one question that relates to proposals 6-11
regarding 13C_dioxide and
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you for proposing this set of names and for the comments received so far.
The proposals look good - I have accepted a couple that seem straight forward
and I think we can agree the rest quite quickly. Please have a look through my
comments on the individual
Dear Martin,
Thank you for making these proposals for VolMIP names and for providing a
definition to explain the difference between volcanic ash and volcanic aerosol.
As you point out in the proposals, these names are analogous to existing ones
and to some that have been proposed for PMIP -
for Environmental Data ArchivalEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> On Behalf Of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent: 14 May 2018
Dear Sebastien, All,
I have just been reading through this thread and it raises some interesting
points.
When I made my original comments back in 2016 (that
ocean_integral_wrt_depth_of_sea_water_practical_salinity (i.e. integral over
the whole depth from sea floor to surface) is a special
Dear Roy et al,
Thank you for the standard name proposals relating to Trac ticket 99 and the
discussion of these. I have added all the proposals to the standard names
editor:
http://cfeditor.ceda.ac.uk/proposals/1?status=active==Lowry99+and+display=Filter.
Initially I made entries for
Dear Jonathan and Karl,
Thank you both for making suggestions to improve the isotope ratio in sea water
names. I think Jonathan's suggestion of
isotope_ratio_of_18O_to_16O_in_sea_water_excluding_solutes_and_solids is the
clearest. We do use 'excluding_X' in some existing names, so it is an
d Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
From: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
Sent: 04 May 2018 15:34
To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP) <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; 'Jonathan
Gregory' <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject
Dear Michael, Michaela and Martin,
Many thanks for checking on the units and definition of the PODy name. I think
we are all now agreed on:
integral_wrt_time_of_mole_stomatal_uptake_of_ozone (mol m-2)
'The phrase "integral_wrt_X_of_Y" means int Y dX. The data variable should have
an axis for X
Dear Martin,
Thank you for checking through these names again.
Martin wrote:
> I accept your suggestion for 1,2,5,6,7,8: I've highlighted in yellow the
> parts of the names which should be removed, and in blue parts I've added to
> bring the terms into the suggested form.
Thank you. It seems
Dear Jonathan,
Well spotted! I think they should all say 'mass_content'. So we should have
nitrogen_mass_content_of_forestry_and_agricultural_products (kg m-2) for
nProduct
soil_mass_content_of_nitrogen (kg m-2) for nSoil.
I will update them in the standard names editor. They will still be
Dear Martin,
Thank you for proposing these two C4MIP names. They both look good to me - I've
added some definitions.
1. CMIP6 sort name nppStem. Net Primary Production Allocated to Stem
> For the related variables nppOther and nppLeaf respetively, we have
>
Dear All,
The standard name and area type tables have both been updated. The standard
name table is now at Version 52 and the area type table is at Version 8, both
dated 16 May 2018. The standard name changes have also been published on the
NERC Vocabulary Server and the area type changes will
solutes_and_solids" means that the standard name refers
only to the chemical compound water and does not include material that may be
dissolved or suspended in the aqueous medium'.
regards,
Martin
____________
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent:
ear_sky
(W m-2)
4.6 surface_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_due_to_ambient_aerosol (W m-2)
4.7
surface_downwelling_shortwave_flux_in_air_due_to_dust_ambient_aerosol_assuming_clear_sky
(W m-2)
and the definitions would need to be adjusted accordingly.
Best wishes,
Alison
--
Alison Pamment Tel:
>> changes caused by aerosol through processes such as cloud seeding. Hence, I
>> suggest sticking with the "net_downward" formulation (it is required for
>> shortwave, and using the same approach for longwave looks neater to me), and
>> appending "direct_effect":
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you for the proposal and discussion of these LS3MIP names. A few can be
accepted straight away because they are based on existing names. I have
questions about the definitions of some of them, mostly regarding the phase of
water and inclusion of ice areas.
e else is happy with this and if all the integral_wrt_X_of_Y standard
names are updated accordingly, I will then encode my "surface to sea floor"
bounds by not specifying the bounds!
thanks a lot!
/Sébastien
- Original Message -
> From: "Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC"
Dear Martin, Karl and Jonathan,
I wrote most of this email late on Friday evening, before Martin and Karl's
comments over the weekend. However, I think it is largely consistent with the
later discussion. I have amended my comments on the evaporation (2.1, 2.2),
evapotranspiration (2.3) and
Dear Martin, Karl and Steve,
Thank you for the proposing these two names and the comments received so far.
fraction_of_rainfall_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
'The phrase "surface_snow" means snow lying on the surface.'
fraction_of_solid_precipitation_mass_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
'The
Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent: 01 June 2018 14:15
To: CF-metadata (cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu) ; 'Bernd
Funke'
Cc: Hideo Shiogama ; Gillett, Nathan (EC)
; Katja Matthes
Subject: [CF-metadata] New standard names proposed for DAMIP
Dear All,
I am proposing five new standard names on behalf of Bernd Funke
Many thanks, Jonathan.
I think all our comments are converging on a similar approach, so I expect
we'll be able to agree the rest of the LS3MIP names shortly.
Best wishes,
Alison
--
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data
ith the surface fields, i.e.
toa_longwave_dust_ambient_aerosol_particles_direct_radiative_effect_assuming_clear_sky
(W m-2).
For the surface fields we have both the direct radiative effect of dust in
normal sky (4.3, 4.6) and the clear sky equivalent (4.4, 4.7).
To answer your questions:
(1) 4
Dear All,
The standard name table has been updated. The current version is now Version
55, dated 12 June 2018. The changes have also been published on the NERC
Vocabulary Server. All changes are listed at the end of this message.
The next update of the standard name table is planned for 2 July
Dear Martin,
Many thanks for making these proposals. I have comments and questions about
some of them. In particular, these proposals have made me think that we can
make better use of area types than we currently do for surface properties and
fluxes such as albedo (1.2), water evaporation
Dear Martin, All,
Thank you, Martin, for proposing the new standard names and area type for SIMIP.
Firstly as regards the area_type for ridged sea ice, this was added to the area
type table in Version 7 as sea_ice_ridges.
Regarding the standard name proposals, there are actually two sets to
Dear All,
There have been some intermittent problems with mail delivery from the list
over the last few days. This was reported to the list owner and the problems
seem to be resolved now. The mailing list archive appears to be updating again.
I think we may have got a little out of sync with
Dear Martin, Jonathan and Daniel,
Thanks for the proposal and discussion of these names. I support the
introduction of these names and agree that 'minus_tendency' is a neat phrase to
describe how they relate to the existing ones of opposite sign convention.
Given that the names differ only in
Dear All,
Standard names were proposed some time ago for CMIP6 RFMIP and some of the
names received a small amount of discussion back in 2016. However, none of the
names were published at that time. Three names were proposed for GeoMIP as long
ago as 2015, but strangely, although I have a copy
Dear All,
The standard name table has been updated. We are currently at version 54, dated
31 May 2018:
http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/current/build/cf-standard-name-table.html.
The standardized region list has also been updated:
Dear All,
I am proposing five new standard names on behalf of Bernd Funke for the CMIP6
DAMIP.
1. CMIP6 short name jo2.
photolysis_rate_of_molecular_oxygen (s-1)
' "Photolysis" is a chemical reaction in which a chemical compound is broken
down by photons. The "reaction rate" is the rate at
diative effect of dust in
normal sky (4.3, 4.6) and the clear sky equivalent (4.4, 4.7).
To answer your questions:
(1) 4.5 should be the direct effect.
(2) Isn't there is some ambiguity in "radiative forcing", in that it can
include both the direct and indirect effects? The indirect effe
ky (4.3, 4.6) and the clear sky equivalent (4.4, 4.7).
To answer your questions:
(1) 4.5 should be the direct effect.
(2) Isn't there is some ambiguity in "radiative forcing", in that it can
include both the direct and indirect effects? The indirect effect is something
which cannot, as f
Dear Jonathan and Elisa,
Thank you, Jonathan, for commenting on the standard names proposed for Dynvar.
I have followed your suggestion and added a definition for
"boundary_layer_mixing": ' "Boundary layer mixing" means turbulent motions that
transport heat, water, momentum and chemical
Dear Jonathan and Martin,
Martin's request for the new region names appeared on the mailing list just as
I was updating the CF website with this week's standard name changes. I see no
reason why these two new entries shouldn't be added, so I did it straight away
and was going to post something
]
tendency_of_sea_water_conservative_temperature_expressed_as_heat_content units
Dear Alison
Yes, this looks fine to me, thanks. I like the simplification for consistency.
Best wishes
Jonathan
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:28:14PM +, Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC wrote:
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 15:28:14 +
> From: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
>
Dear Dirk,
Thank you to you and Bruno for looking at these definitions again. I willl make
the changes you have requested.
All three names are now accepted for publication in the standard name table and
will be added in the 2nd July update.
I am pleased to say that we have now agreed all the
uish between the two diagnostics.
Stephen
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>> wrote:
Dear Martin, Stephen and Jonathan,
We have seven existing
tendency_of_sea_water_conservative_temperature_expressed_as_heat_content
Dear Martin,
Thank you for the proposals for one new standard name and one new area type for
LUMIP.
1. Proposed area_type: herbaceous_vegetation
'Herbaceous plants are plants with very flexible stems. Their leaves and stems
die down to soil level at the end of every growing season. Herbaceous
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you for the proposal for four names for AerChemMIP and for the discussion.
1.
tendency_of_atmosphere_mole_concentration_of_nitrous_oxide_due_to_chemical_destruction
(mol m-3 s-1)
'The phrase "tendency_of_X" means derivative of X with respect to time. Mole
Dear Martin,
Thank you for proposing the new standard name land_ice_basal_temperature
[units: K]. We already have the area_types grounded_ice_sheet and
floating_ice_shelf, so that is fine.
The name and units look good and I have added the following definition:
' "Land ice" means glaciers,
Dear Martin,
Thank you for your reply. Please see below for my suggestions for resolving the
remaining names in this discussion. I think we are getting very close now!
1.1 canopy_albedo (1)
'Albedo is the ratio of outgoing to incoming shortwave irradiance, where
'shortwave irradiance' means
Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data ArchivalEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata On Behalf Of Alison
Pamment - UKRI
Dear Dirk,
Thank you for checking the names again.
>just a few minor replies:
>
> > Thank you, Dirk, for providing a better definition of sea ice. I've taken
> > your sentence and added a little more, in the hope of making the intention
> > as clear as possible: ' "Sea ice" means all ice
> >
--
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data ArchivalEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
___
Dear Andy, Jonathan and Roy,
Apologies for the delay in reviewing this thread and thank you all for the
considerable effort that clearly went into agreeing these names.
The discussion reached consensus in May, so all that remains is to accept the
following three names for publication in the
Dear Andy, Roy and Jonathan,
I have reviewed these proposals for new sea surface wave names. Thanks once
again for a clear and useful discussion. Consensus was reached in May, so the
following 16 new names are accepted for publication in the standard name table:
axis. The vertical/Z
axis, or yaw axis, is an imaginary line running vertically through the platform
and through its center of gravity.
A yaw motion is a side-to side movement of the bow and stern of the ship.
And we had something like this for heave:
platform_heave (m) = upwards vertical displacemen
al Message-
From: CF-metadata On Behalf Of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent: 25 July 2018 13:12
To: Hamilton, Steve ; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Platform Heave
Dear Steve, Nan, et al,
Thank you for proposing new standard names for platform_heave and improved
d
heers, Roy.
I have now retired but will continue to be active through an Emeritus
Fellowship using this e-mail address.
____________
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent: 25 July 2018 14:37
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Plat
IMIP: 5 standard names and one area type for CMIP6
>
> Dear Alison
>
> Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for considering it.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 01:41:23PM +, Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 28 Ju
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you both for the very useful discussion of these names. I agree with
Martin that the existing sensible_heat_flux names probably should become
turbulent_heat_flux names. There are only four of them, but I will address
those in a separate thread.
For the LS3MIP
___
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory
Sent: 01 July 2018 18:27
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard names for LS3MIP: 8 temporal changes + 1
feature depth
Dear Alison
These all look fine to me. Thanks very much
Jonathan
- Forwarded message
ted by the coordinate variable?
regards,
Martin
____
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent: 28 June 2018 16:50
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Precipitation fractions for LS3MIP
Dear Karl, Jonathan and Martin,
nd or onto the total grid area. What is the "domain" that is
intended to be represented by the coordinate variable?
regards,
Martin
From: CF-metadata <mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC <mailto:al
Dear Steve,
Thank you for your message and apologies for not having processed your
proposals as yet. I have been working on the CMIP names, but they are reaching
a conclusion and I will shortly be looking through the many other proposals
that have been waiting for attention.
A quick look
Dear All,
In an effort to wrap up the last few changes related to CMIP6 standard names I
have done another small update to the standard name table. The latest version
is now Version 57, dated 11 July 2018. The changes have also been published on
the NERC Vocabulary Server and are listed at the
Dear Martin,
After all the progress in recent weeks we have now reached the position where
there is just one CMIP6 name remaining to be agreed.
It is the PMIP name:
isotope_ratio_of_2H_to_1H_in_sea_water_excluding_solutes_and_solids (1)
'The phrase "ratio_of_X_to_Y" means X/Y. The phrase
Dear All,
The standard name and area type tables have both been updated. The standard
name table is now at Version 56 and the area type table is at Version 9, both
dated 4th July 2018. The standard name changes have also been published on the
NERC Vocabulary Server and the area type changes
reg...@ncas.ac.uk>
Sent: 01 July 2018 18:27
To: mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard names for LS3MIP: 8 temporal changes + 1
feature depth
Dear Alison
These all look fine to me. Thanks very much
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
<
__
From: CF-metadata <mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC <mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>
Sent: 12 June 2018 13:40:23
To: CF-metadata (mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)
Subject: [CF-metadata] Standard name table up
Dear Martin,
Okay, thank you. The vote is carried! The following aliases will be created in
the next standard name table update:
river_water_volume_transport_into_cell ->
incoming_water_volume_transport_along_river_channel
river_water_volume_transport_out_of_cell
Dear Sophie,
Thanks for contacting me about the remaining ISMIP6 names. I recall that much
of the discussion of these names had centred around the definitions, rather
than the names themselves. I've now looked back through our various
conversations from 2016 and 2017 and I think that most of
- UKRI STFC [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 April 2018 10:42
To: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>; Jones, Chris D
<chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: New standard names for C4MIP - part 2
Dear Chris, Alison,
These name
Dear Elisa, All,
I am proposing these new standard names on behalf of Elisa Manzini. They are
needed for the CMIP6 Dynvar experiment.
I am sure that Elisa will comment on the names and definitions in due course
and other comments and suggestions for improvement are always welcome.
1. (CMIP6
Dear Chris,
> Now agreed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 21.
Okay, thank you. These names are all now accepted and will be published in the
next update of the standard name table.
Only five left to go...
15. (CMIP short name fNdep)
We've discussed various solutions for this one, but now we seem to have
+0000
> From: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>
> To: "'Nowicki, Sophie (GSFC-6150)'" <sophie.nowi...@nasa.gov>,
> "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Cc: "h.goel...@uu.nl" <h.goel...@uu.
th System and Mitigation Science Team Met Office Hadley Centre,
FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, U.K.
Tel: +44 (0)1392 884514 Fax: +44 (0)1392 885681
E-mail: chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
-Original Message-
From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC [mailto:marti
Tel: +44 (0)1392 884514 Fax: +44 (0)1392 885681
E-mail: chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
-Original Message-
From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 05 April 2018 13:09
To: Jones, Chris D <chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk>
Dear All,
The standard name table has been updated to version 51, dated 17 April 2018:
http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/current/build/cf-standard-name-table.html.
The changes have also been published on the NERC Vocabulary Server:
http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P07/current/.
Dear Burkhardt, Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you Burkhardt for these proposals for hail and graupel names and thanks
to Martin and Jonathan for commenting.
The names themselves look fine. For the flux names graupel_fall_flux,
hail_fall_flux and graupel_and_hail_fall_flux I think the units should
Dear Burkhardt, Martin and Jonathan,
Thank you Burkhardt for these proposals for hail and graupel names and thanks
to Martin and Jonathan for commenting.
The names themselves look fine. For the flux names graupel_fall_flux,
hail_fall_flux and graupel_and_hail_fall_flux I think the units should
Dear Maarten and Martin,
Many thanks for these proposals and apologies for not having responded sooner.
There seems to be full agreement that four of the names are a straight forward
addition to the standard name table.
1. atmosphere_mole_content_of_methane (mol m-2)
' "Content" indicates a
Dear Martin, All,
Thank you for this proposal and the discussion of a standard name to describe
all types of solid precipitation. I have reviewed the thread and it seems
agreement has been reached on
solid_precipitation_flux (kg m-2 s-1)
'In accordance with common usage in geophysical
for polishing the definitions and spotting the error in the units for
the fluxes.
Your definitions look find to me. In the definitions for hail it may be added
that for sizes lower than 5mm the name „graupel" should be used.
Regards
Burkhardt
Am 18.04.2018 um 19:17 schrieb Alison Pamme
n behalf of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC <mailto:alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk>
Sent: 24 April 2018 18:37
To: CF-metadata (mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu)
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CMIP6 data request: Precipitation of solid phase
water
Dear Martin, All,
Thank you for this proposal and the discu
.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk;
Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
Subject: New standard names for C4MIP - part 2
Quick check before it is final. Do we really want the underscore between "soil"
and "pool" in "soil_pool_carbon_decay_rate" but not in "soilpool"
-- Ev
, EX1 3PB, U.K.
Tel: +44 (0)1392 884514 Fax: +44 (0)1392 885681
E-mail: chris.d.jo...@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
-Original Message-
From: Martin Juckes - UKRI STFC [mailto:martin.juc...@stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: 12 April 2018 15:53
To: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC <alison.
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
Just picking up on this thread again - this is the 3rd (and final) group of
LS3MIP names remaining to be resolved.
We have now received clarification of how various parts of the land liquid
water and ice budget are calculated, which I copy below so that we have a
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
This is just to follow up on my suggestion of using thermal energy content
instead of sensible heat flux for proposal 3:
change_over_time_in_thermal_energy_content_of_ice_and_snow_on_land (J m-2).
'The phrase "change_over_time_in_X" means change in a quantity X over a
On Behalf Of Alison
Pamment - UKRI STFC
Sent: 29 June 2018 10:41
To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP) ; 'Jonathan
Gregory' ; 'cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu'
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Final 17 terms for CMIP6 LS3MIP: Heat flux into
snowpack
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
This is just to follow up on my
would
like to have some explanation of the relationship between the two terms as I
feel that it contributes to the clarify of the definition.
11. The asymmetry refers to the scattering phase function asymmetry, so how
about scattering_asymmetry_factor_of_ambient_aerosol_particles ?
regards,
Martin
___
Dear Dirk and Martin,
Thank you, Dirk, for checking again about these names and to Bruno for
answering my questions!
> > (3a) sishevelMaximum shear strain rate of sea-ice velocity field (s-1)
> >
> > Maximum shear strain rate of sea-ice velocity field (second shear strain
> > invariant:
Dear Dirk and Martin,
Thank you both for looking through all the SIMIP proposals again.
Thank you, Dirk, for providing a better definition of sea ice. I've taken your
sentence and added a little more, in the hope of making the intention as clear
as possible: ' "Sea ice" means all ice floating
Dear Martin, Stephen and Jonathan,
We have seven existing
tendency_of_sea_water_conservative_temperature_expressed_as_heat_content names
(and seven existing
tendency_of_sea_water_potential_temperature_expressed_as_heat_content names)all
with units of W m-2. I think all of these were
Forwarding this message to the list.
--
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data ArchivalEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
-Original
Dear Jonathan,
Thank you for commenting on these names. If I understand you correctly, then
the two 'maximum' names and definitions would be rearranged as follows.
maximum_over_coordinate_rotation_of_sea_ice_horizontal_shear_strain_rate (s-1)
'"Sea ice" means all ice floating in the sea which
Dear Martin and Jonathan,
We are getting very close to agreeing all these names and I'd like to include
as many as possible in the standard names update next week. Unless anyone
objects I am going to accept and include the following proposals as written in
t; temperature (rather than heat content) because it allows us to specify
> whether we mean potential or conservative temperature.
>
> I agree that we could insert integral_wrt_depth_of, for both set of names.
> However this seems a bit surprising since the names are ge
uld be a
> reordering to
>mass_fraction_of_rainfall_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
>mass_fraction_of_solid_precipitation_falling_onto_surface_snow (1)
> We have many mass_fraction names, and consistency could be good.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Alison Pamment
Dear Andy and Jonathan,
Thank you for the proposal and discussion of these seven new names.
For the first five I have made some minor cosmetic tweaks to the definitions. I
have also added a reference (originally provided by Andy) to the Charnock
definition. It is fine, indeed useful, if we can
Dear Karl et al.,
Thank you all for the comments in this discussion, which I have been watching
with interest.
I think we can regard the three existing land ice area_types as nested:
ice_sheets= Grounded ice sheets + Floating ice shelves;
land_ice= ice_sheets + Glaciers + Ice caps;
n_land. Therefore I suggest that we made ice_on_land into an
alias of ice_and_snow_on_land.
Best wishes
Jonathan
----- Forwarded message from Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
-
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:05:06 +
> From: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
> To: Karl Taylor , Martin Jucke
Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/Centre for Environmental Data ArchivalEmail: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata On Behalf Of Alison
Pamment
Dear Rob,
Apologies that I haven't responded in this thread until today. I see from a
quick scan of the comments that the name is pretty much agreed. I need to check
through properly, and if all is in order then the name can be accepted and
added in the next update to the table. I'll have a
Dear All,
The standard name table has been updated today. The current version is now
Version 60, dated 16 October 2018. The changes have also been published on the
NERC Vocabulary Server. All changes are listed at the end of this message.
Paul Halloran has been added to the list of standard
Dear Andy and Jonathan,
Thanks for looking at these names again. In fact, I think Jonathan's email did
originally appear on the list on 5th October and the comments were taken into
account.
I have accepted all seven names and included them in today's update (see
separate posting for full list
://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Ice><http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Ice>*
> includes snow, which leaves the definition of "firn" a bit wanting.
>
>
> For the glaciologists, the transformation snow --> firn --> ice appears to be
> well established, but there are
Dear Jim, Roy, Nan, Jonathan, et al.,
I have drawn together what I hope is the final list for the platform names.
We seem to be agreed on the need to have triplets of names to cope with
opposite sign conventions and the case where the sign convention is unknown.
I've followed Roy's comment
.
From: CF-metadata on behalf of James Orr
Sent: 05 October 2018 14:26
To: Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC
Cc: 'Halloran, Paul'; mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] New name: fugacity of CO2
Hi Allison, Paul, Roy, et al.,
I would suggest to replace the 3rd
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
