On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote:
Unfortunately, it's nearly impossible to continue a forked process on
OS X if it uses any higher-level (above POSIX) APIs.
Nothing says we have to use fork(). Always having a renderer process
started and waiting for
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jens Alfke s...@google.com wrote:
Not on a cold launch, since the renderer uses a lot of code (like
WebCore) that the browser doesn't, and will be paging that stuff in.
We'll need to benchmark both scenarios.
Indeed. Proof of concept code that we can compare
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jickae Davis jick...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I agree with PhistucK. I think a progress bar may help though it's
not so accurate.
By the way, if I want to add such a bar with chromium, how should I start?
Is there a method that tells the size of the resources to
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:02 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, maybe I used a wrong term in asking my question.
I think I am looking for the code which chormium create a native UI
widget for each html input submit button in the html source. I assume
chromium needs to use 1 native UI
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Jickae Davis jick...@gmail.com wrote:
No--there is in fact no way to determine that in advance. Each resource
can reference other resources, and even for a single resource we often don't
know what size it is until we finish loading it.
We could provide a
Most awesome. Very good catch.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Julie Parent jpar...@chromium.org wrote:
For those of you looking into flaky tests -
I've found a surprising number of tests that are flaky because they use a
setTimeout to guarantee that a resource (usually an iframe) has
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm putting together a new computer and I'd like to optimize my chromium
build times :-) Is anyone currently building chromium using a solid state
drive? Have you noticed any compile or link time speed
Could you do some of this with a canvas (app/gfx/canvas.h)? It's supported
on all platforms, though it's not heavily used. The sad plugin code is an
example. Right now it only handles rects, images, and text, but adding path
drawing to it shouldn't be difficult...
--Amanda
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Do websites provide users with previous versions after overhauling their
UX? Some do (gmail seems to), but most do not. You just get to surf the
latest. Hopefully, the website changes for the better. That's our burden
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote:
This all means that we have to be a bit more diligent. We shouldn't be
paying these unnecessary costs. So, from now on, I propose a fairly
simple set of new rules:
1) if you write a Chromium patch for WebKit, you must
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
All software, and all browsers, change their UI and capabilities as they
release new versions. Look at how Firefox 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5 all had
different main window themes (and not just cosmetically; they moved
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
Oh, and, if your change turned the tree red for 3 hours, don't be mad at
the sheriff when he pings
you repeatedly about the status of the fix. His job is to keep the tree
green and running. He does
not care about
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jacob Mandelson ja...@mandelson.org wrote:
It was more surprised that I was expected to have built chrome at home
under multiple platforms.
I wouldn't say that we expect people to build chrome at home under
multiple platforms. We expect patches not to break
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
An external contributor was recently surprised that a change tested
on linux was reverted because it broke the build on windows.
(His mental model was that linux developers don't have to
worry about other platforms, that's what
I blogged about that when we kicked off the additional platform
efforts, though it's probably a good idea to say something about it on
the site as well.
--Amanda
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Nico Weber tha...@chromium.org wrote:
An external contributor was recently surprised that a
Sure. I'd run anything I write up past Ben, brian, etc. first before
posting anything.
--Amanda
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Nico Weber tha...@chromium.org wrote:
While you're on it, could you add something like
The main problem is that it doesn't work through NAT routers or
firewalls, since it relies on the remote end opening a connection back
to the client. There's no big advantage unless you're talking to an
old FTP server that doesn't support passive FTP.
--Amanda
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
I can't think of any. It would be nice to have active support. I'm not
sure how easy it is to auto-detect which one we should use (since all the
FTP clients I've ever used have forced me to specify manually).
It should
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Michal Zalewski lcam...@gmail.com wrote:
My reading of the bug is the former, since the latter would be fairly
astonishing. Passive FTP does not require any special inspection by
NAT, while active does.
Likewise, passive mode requires inspection on
client
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Michal Zalewski lcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Are we trying to solve the problem of the server having no passive FTP
support (how common would that be?), or of the server's firewall / NAT
device not having FTP traffic inspection helpers?
My reading of the bug is the
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Michal Zalewski lcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Err, the other way round obviously (passive requires server-side
support to rewrite IP and port data in FTP command responses behind
NAT, and punch a temporary hole in the firewall allowing the client to
connect back to
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Michal Zalewski lcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, let's say the server has an internal IP of 1.2.3.4, and along
with several other nodes in its cluster, is publicly NATed to 4.3.2.1.
The client says PASV, and the server, unless explicitly aware of its
current
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jóijoi.sigurds...@gmail.com wrote:
At least on Windows, the NPAPI plug-in would be loaded into the Chrome
process, so there would need to be a flag to select between 32-bit and
64-bit versions of the plug-in if Chrome starts being available as a
native 64-bit
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Aaron Boodmana...@chromium.org wrote:
Ok, but does it always have the same structure, and is there a naming
convention?
Yes. The top level folder is always named the plugin name +
.plugin, and always has a file Info.plist inside with all of the
metadata, names
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Aaron Boodmana...@chromium.org wrote:
Yeah, I am kinda curious whether this approach can work generically
without adding anything to the manifest. Particularly since there is a
naming convention for shared libraries on all platforms.
Plugins aren't even always
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jóijoi.sigurds...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, you're right, Chrome's multi-process architecture would let you
host the plug-in in a 32-bit process even if the rest of Chrome is 64-
bit. However, if the extension author wants to provide both 32-bit
and 64-bit
Great writeup. There's definitely too much going on in the UI thread. Even
after the page paints, I'm seeing multi-second pauses while additional stuff
comes in, where the browser process is unresponsive (example: iGoogle with a
bunch of gadgets). It's not clear to me why any http resource
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
HTTP resource loading shouldn't be on the browser's main thread. This
only applies to DOM UI resource loading, chrome: and chrome-internal:.
That stuff gets funneled through the browser's main thread for things
like
If you are running Chromium from inside Xcode, make sure that you turn
off the Stop on Debugger()/DebugStr() option in the Run menu. The
Flash plugin makes a call to Debugger() when it starts up--normally
this is harmless, but if you are running from Xcode instead of the
Finder, it will cause
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Ben Laurieb...@chromium.org wrote:
I'd be happy to do that. When I do, there's something that's already
puzzling me, and that's OS_POSIX.
I don't have a copy of the POSIX standard, at least not a recent one,
so its hard to know what is or isn't POSIX, and I
Oops, didn't see how long the thread was :-).
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Amanda Walkerama...@chromium.org wrote:
Safari does not. Single click sets the text caret where you click.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:36
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Drew Wilsonatwil...@chromium.org wrote:
I have to admit I'm somewhat fuzzy on the motivation behind our webkit API,
although I gather the plan is to eventually upstream it to WebKit, and use
it as our abstraction layer instead of using the (more mutable)
Being dismissive and sarcastic will do that, yes.
--Amanda
On Wednesday, August 19, 2009, codfather swcodfat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, have I touched a nerve.
On Aug 19, 5:32 pm, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to add the new features to a version, first, you have a (stable)
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:43 PM, bsmedbergbsmedb...@gmail.com wrote:
The most obvious problem is that both processes may send a synchronous
IPC message at the same time. Assuming that these don't deadlock, the
native stack for the two calls would end up interleaved.
While there may be a
While bot health is separate from tree health, I'm not sure we really
want to tolerate redness because a bot is sick--it'll still keep us
from noticing regressions or bustage in a timely fashion. However, a
way to visually distinguish between build failure and bot failure
would be nice. out of
I agree. Every clobber means we have a dependency bug. I would prefer that
we track and fix those bugs than get desensitized to them.
--Amanda
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Such a system does not help when people sync your change. We should
invest
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:32 AM, PhistucK phist...@chromium.org wrote:
Obviously, but since there is a website (what started this thread) and
people do run into issues (Help forums) with such a thing, is a specific
solution for Flash, at least, coming up soon? People getting infected while
We've already started to tackle the issue (see the existing code that is
turned on with --safe-plugins), we just haven't solved it. As several of us
have said in the thread, we'd welcome additional contributions towards a
robust plugin sandbox. However, if someone doesn't believe us when we (a)
Very much agreed. If anything is red, and it's not immediately clear
that someone's on it, close the tree. The burden should be on whoever
is explaining why the tree is open but red, not why it's closed,
especially for the sheriff.
--Amanda
On Wednesday, August 5, 2009, Peter Kasting
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Erik Kayerik...@chromium.org wrote:
In my use case, 80% of my tabs could easily be killed / suspended (or even
hidden altogether) without any downside to me. The problem is that there
isn't a way to automatically figure out which ones are which. Which ones
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Adam Barthaba...@chromium.org wrote:
Wow, there are even more on Mac:
Expected to fail, but passed (39)
If some of those are plugin related, it's because I didn't remember
last night that the --enable-plugins flag I checked in didn't affect
test shell, so many
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Adam Barthaba...@chromium.org wrote:
Expected to crash, but passed (9):
LayoutTests/fast/dom/offset-parent-positioned-and-inline.html
LayoutTests/fast/events/message-channel-gc-2.html
LayoutTests/fast/events/message-channel-gc-4.html
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think we should re-enable them ASAP unless there's some good reason why
you want to wait.
They've been stable and passing all morning, so that works for me.
--Amanda
And as soon as I took them out, they started failing again. We're reverting.
--Amanda
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Amanda Walkerama...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think we should re-enable them ASAP unless there's some
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
Given that there are a large number of ways to open the home page in a new
foreground tab (e.g. ctrl-t + click, shift-middle click, etc.), there are a
very large number of other places in the UI where middle-click opens a
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Avi Drissmana...@google.com wrote:
Two things. First, this doesn't happen on Windows. Second, how do you get an
image shifted one pixel to the right? On the Mac, ImageDecoder::Decode uses
the webkit decoders which on the Mac return a CGImage, and then
Sorry for the typos--I'm still working on my first coffee of the day :-).
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Amanda Walkerama...@chromium.org wrote:
There are no active plans at the moment, but it could be done if a
strong reason to arose.
to - to do so
code charing with Apple.
charing -
3.0.190 is the current developer channel build.
Its release notes are at
http://dev.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel/release-notes as
usual.
--Amanda
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives,
The Mac OS X port uses CoreGraphics to render page contents rather
than Skia (it shares most of the rendering code with Apple's mac port,
though Skia is used elsewhere in Mac Chrome for a variety of
purposes). If you are trying to learn more about Skia, I would
suggest trying the Linux version
This is a great overview! Thanks for writing this up.
I wonder if it's worth giving some more guidance about when to use
#ifdef vs. say splitting out a couple of methods into a
platform-specific file. For example: if you find yourself wrapping
the entire body of a function in platform #ifdefs,
It does not depend on scope. By default, every change that is uploaded by a
committer for code review gets built on all three platforms by Google's try
servers.
--Amanda
2009/6/7 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com
I forgot about the cross platform compiling stuff.
I do not think every change is
Anyone ccould set one up for their own use, or even public use if they
wanted to--the ones Google has set up are just a convenience provided to
committers that may not have a machine of each platform available.
--Amanda
2009/6/7 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com
A Try Bot is a machine that gets sent
TestShell does not use a separate renderer process.
--Amanda
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Lucius Fox lucius.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
I can build and debug TestShell project. But can you please tell me
how to attach appropriate renderer with Shark?
What is an appropriate renderer?
On Mon,
There is only one form of version control, which is the Subversion
repository. For convenience, we provide a few alternatives to checking out
a source tree from subversion and building it:
tarballs: a tarball is a tar format archive of a complete source tree that
has been checked out from the
Would an iterator method on CommandLine serve the same purpose? It seems
like that could work without having to make a copy...
--Amanda
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Book'em Dano daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have objections to including such a function? It would
just return a
Xcode can have problems properly setting breakpoints in subprojects. There
are two ways to work around this:
- Uncheck the Load *symbols lazily option in Xcode's debugging
preferences.*
- Open up the gdb console window and set breakpoints from the gdb command
line
--Amanda
2009/5/29 Lucius Fox
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
Don't bother doing an assertion when the next line will crash anyway:
DCHECK(foo);
foo-DoSomething();
will normally crash pretty obviously dereferencing a NULL pointer
(even though it will be inside DoSomething).
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I think if we require everyone to handle every failed DCHECK, then what we
will really do is compel people to write fewer DCHECKs, which means that we
will lose some of the documentation benefits. That seems undesirable
I'm pretty happy with it. It would be nice to polish things like the
missing shadow, but that shouldn't stop us from landing it or adding
it to GTM.
--Amanda
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Robert Sesek rse...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that Firefox's implemntation makes the most sense from a
usability perspective. Those long menus in Safari are next to
worthless if you have a decent-sized browsing history and really just
clutter things up.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Mark Larson (Google) m...@chromium.org
wrote:
Just so it's clear to me... why do we need a History menu?
There's a link to history from the wrench menu/Ctrl+H and also from the New
Tab page.
The
back button provides at least 12 entries from the back
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Marc-Andre Decoste m...@google.com wrote:
I don't think I can do the save/restore trick in
PlatformDeviceMac::LoadClippingRegionToCGContext(), because this a static
method with no context... But I noticed that it is only called at one place,
within
The mac build does something like this: the background color of all
the windows is actually magenta, which makes it very obvious when
something's not getting painted or the process isn't responding to
events.
--Amanda
2009/5/20 Linus Upson li...@google.com:
I think it would be great if I
, Amanda Walker awal...@google.com
wrote:
Hmm. Marc, your change looks OK to me at first glance--how does it
fail?
--Amanda
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote:
I'm view meister, not render meister. Amanda is IIRC backing
store/canvas
meister.
Avi
the host to only paint a set of
sub-rectangle from that bitmap.
Do I explain it clearly enough?
Thanks
BYE
MAD
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Amanda Walker awal...@google.com
wrote:
Hmm. Marc, your change looks OK to me at first glance--how does it
fail?
--Amanda
On Wed, May 13, 2009
Perhaps what we need is a companion to FilePath. For example:
FilePath: much as it is now, lightweight, alternative to string manipulation.
FileReference: heavierweight, can talk to the file system and have
carnal knowledge of platform specifics for things like resolving /
canonicalizing
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
Perhaps what we need is a companion to FilePath. For example:
FilePath: much as it is now, lightweight, alternative to string
manipulation
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org wrote:
It's why we have checkin notification emails.
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-checkins?pli=1
I also like the RSS feeds, especially on a mobile device:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-checkins/feeds
Yeah. And I have to say, the tab-modal file sheet is very, very cool.
It would be a shame to lose that capability.
--Amanda
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote:
The problem with that approach is that you can't cleanly close a sheet in
the general case. If
That's cleaner than I expected, and the behavior looks right. Nice
job! I vote for continuing with this approach.
--Amanda
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote:
OK, so attached is my proof of concept. The code is pretty clear, though if
you have questions,
2009/5/6 Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.org:
We'll ping WebKit to find out the reasoning behind passing in a
GraphicsContext. Probably for performance reasons and reducing extra
blits/copies, but still worth investigating.
Probably that and preserving any active transforms, as Brett
Hmm. Rather than an idle event, how about a general way to notify on
machine state changes? idle / busy, ac / battery, willsleep /
didwake, etc. all seem to have the same usage pattern. Apps could
then key off of the notification to start/stop workers or timers for
idle processing, etc.
to duplicate it.
--Amanda
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Никита Офицеров himi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry for the late response, I've been quite busy last week.
2009/4/27 Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org:
Hacky is fairly subjective: are there particular things about the
existing
I'd be worried about flashing/jankiness using a real sheet, but a
child window pinned to the top edge of the tab with the right
transitions might work nicely. There's also some stuff Jeremy was
doing in Gears that involved doing interesting things with login
prompts that may (or may not) be
That would be pretty clean--or perhaps wrap it in a PlatformCanvas
instead of a bare PlatformGraphicsContext? I haven't looked at the
media code yet, so I'm not familiar with what it's actually trying to
do.
--Amanda
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
On
Ah, I see. Hmm, going in that direction (from a GraphicsContext back
up to the PlatformCanvas that wraps it) is an interesting question
(the rest of our rendering code goes in the other direction). And as
Brett can attest, this isn't the first time that PLATFORM(CG) has
caused a headache--we
The Mac needs something morally equivalent to #2 (with plugins as the
current forcing function--there's no cross-process window handle we
can use, so we need to track them ourselves anyway). I also strongly
agree that the browser needs to be able to validate which window(s) a
renderer can ask
The only thing I can thing of that involves a
client-server-client-server-client world tour in X is selection
handling, but that's asynchronous. Querying window properties only
looks at server state (also true for the Mac's window server--there's
no such thing as a synchronous call from the
is, which sounds
similar to gtk_native_view_id_manager...
Adam
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
The Mac needs something morally equivalent to #2 (with plugins as the
current forcing function--there's no cross-process window handle we
can use, so we need
Hmm. Would it be even cleaner for nothing but the plugin host process
to care about the NativeViewId, since it's what has to provide it to
the plugin via NPAPI? For everything else, either we're windowless
and just shipping bitmaps around (no need for a window reference at
all except to keep
.
-Darin
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
Hmm. Would it be even cleaner for nothing but the plugin host process
to care about the NativeViewId, since it's what has to provide it to
the plugin via NPAPI? For everything else, either we're windowless
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Greg Spencer gspen...@google.com wrote:
1) I'd like to add some explicit routines for converting to/from UTF8 and
UTF16. While it's nice (and important) that FilePath uses the platform's
native string, we've found that many third party libraries have made
pinker...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
Application startup is one of the areas where we count every
millisecond, and try to touch the disk as little as possible. I don't
think it's safe to assume that the cost of creating
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Nikita Ofitserov himi...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently there are different implementations of ProcessSingleton and
ChromeBrowserProcessId() on Windows, Linux and Mac. Most of them are
quite hacky, so there should be a better way. I think current IPC
system with
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
The Mac implementation is wrong. On a single core machine, the renderer
could starve the UI thread of the browser, preventing any pixels from ever
being updated on the screen.
That seems wrong--the OS-prompted draw
2009/3/24 John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org:
Right, this is used so that if the user starts Chrome a second time, it
tells the currently running exe to open a new tab. This is the standard way
of doing it on Windows, but I don't know how Mac/Linux apps enforce
single-instance semantics.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
A lot of the code that touches databases/files in the user-data-dir assume
they're the only ones accessing them. If multiple instances use the data,
there could be corruption.
Makes sense. But multiple instances
, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Thomas Van Lenten
thoma...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
2009/3/24 John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org:
Right, this is used so that if the user starts Chrome a second time, it
tells the currently running exe
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
This issue is really quite serious for me as I am unable to use
chromium on certain websites. I have hacked my uxtheme.dll on Windows
XP so that I may apply third party visual themes to windows.
Chromium does not yet
with the code changes.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Robert Dailey rcdai...@gmail.com wrote:
This issue is really quite serious for me as I am unable to use
chromium on certain websites. I have hacked my uxtheme.dll on Windows
XP
Nicolas,
I like this a *lot*--it makes it much easier to see which build or
test failures resulted from a particular commit. Very nice job!
--Amanda
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org wrote:
Hello!
A lot of people told me that they did not like the
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I wonder if the situation is at all similar on Mac.
The Mac is pretty flexible in this regard--we can create arbitrarily
shaped windows that are grouped/stacked with existing windows however
we want (or put another way,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Thomas Van Lenten
thoma...@chromium.org wrote:
What happens when we want to paste into an html edit area?
Well, at least last time I looked at editable areas, they weren't
handled via NSStrings, so I don't think we'd run into this problem
there.
Do we need to
Do we know it's obj-c collision? Or is it C++ types that are
typedefed differently for us, but conveniently named-mangled the same
so they link?
--Amanda
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Mark Mentovai mmento...@google.com wrote:
Avi Drissman wrote:
4. Figure out why system WebKit doesn't
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Mark Mentovai mmento...@google.com wrote:
Binding C++ shouldn't be nearly as painful on the Mac: stuff is bound
into a two-level namespace at link time.
Ah, excellent point.
The smart money's on Obj-C
which binds at runtime every time, but in today's
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
Do you mean when you click on the menu, blocking the browser until the
renderer responds with whether the menus can be enabled? I would be
opposed to that.
So are we, but that's what WebKit currently assumes. That's why
Because we don't see the mouse click for the main menu bar the same
way we do for a context menu. Normally, we just get called back after
a menu item has been selected. It's possible to update state while
the menu is down, but that brings in the possibility of flashing/etc.
as the menu changes
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Alpha (Hin-Chung) Lam hc...@google.com wrote:
everytime I do a checkin I do a sync and send it
to the try server, which really takes me a lot of time, but still try server
is showing me green light to check in, am I suppose to not trust the try
server and rely
IMEs on the Mac even further decouple keystrokes from input
characters, and we're going to need explicit support for them (since
they will probably have to live in the browser process in order to put
up windows, etc.). There will probably be a level at which we'll have
to write some glue to feed
It is the Chromium application icon for the Mac.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Daniel dpc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know what is the app\theme\chromium\chromium.icns file is
used for?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
