Hi,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 07:10:24AM -0500, Jeff Bacon wrote:
What's an output drop mean, in a 3560 context?
Traffic too bursty, output buffers too tiny.
Is there a way to tell the 3560 to buffer more aggressively?
As far as our experience with 2960Gs goes, the only way to achieve that
is
Daer All,
I'm looking for utilities which allow to have ASN statistics, the
netflow tools I tried doesn't do that, any idea?
BR
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
take a look at:
https://neon1.net/as-stats/as-stats-presentation-swinog16.pdf
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM, RAZAFINDRATSIFA Rivo Tahina
r.tah...@moov.mg wrote:
Daer All,
I'm looking for utilities which allow to have ASN statistics, the netflow
tools I tried doesn't do that, any idea?
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:44:24 +0200, Gert Doering wrote
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 07:10:24AM -0500, Jeff Bacon wrote:
What's an output drop mean, in a 3560 context?
Traffic too bursty, output buffers too tiny.
Is there a way to tell the 3560 to buffer more aggressively?
There's a
dear team,
i want to check my bandwidth using file transfer please help how to do that.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
AFAIK this command is for eBGP only, no?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L
matlo...@exempla.orgwrote:
Router bgp AS
Neighbor AS ttl-security hops hops
?
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
-Original Message-
I'm looking for utilities which allow to have ASN statistics, the netflow
tools I tried doesn't do that, any idea?
take a look at NetQos ReportAnalyzer
--
Gustaf Hyllested Serve
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:59:55PM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
[...]
! Only output queue-set 1, queue 2 is used. Adjust all thresholds to
! 400% of default. (This is AFAIK the maximum even though the parser
! accepts up to 3200%.)
mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 400 400 100 400
So main
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 10:45 +0100, Mateusz Blaszczyk wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:59:55PM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
[...]
! Only output queue-set 1, queue 2 is used. Adjust all thresholds to
! 400% of default. (This is AFAIK the maximum even though the parser
! accepts up to 3200%.)
yes, only supported for ebgp. Would be interested about the very
specific design and why Manu requires this functionality?
oli
AFAIK this command is for eBGP only, no?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L
matlo...@exempla.orgwrote:
Router bgp AS
Neighbor AS
Silly (semi-related) question, but I (hope) you are not installing a
default to ppp0 on your *nix box when the session comes up, or if you
are, you have a static via your main nic to the l2tp endpoint address,
else you will cause the tunnel to fall down due to recursion.
Dave.
Hello,
My understanding is that this queueing mode can be based only on COS
field on GE and 10/100/1000 line cards. So what will be the router
behaviour if there is no 802.Q and therefore no 802.1p
During processing, PFC QoS represents the priority of all traffic (including
non-IP traffic)
I'm trying to figure out why i have this output:
++
12k2sh env power_supply
Failsafe power system
Slot # 48V AMP_48
(Volt) (Amp)
27 PEM153 10 Failsafe-PEM= Failsafe PS
this looks like
hi all
i have SCE 2020 with sca console 3.5.0
i installed RTM on it and all is working fine
now i have another SCE with SCA console 3.5.0 (the same console version) and
its 8000 series
but when i try to apply the ./rtmcmd.sh with the rest of the line , i get the
below error
Failed
to
Hello Oliver,
Any possibilities of 12.0(32)SY6 being affected too ?
12k2sh ver | inc IOS
IOS (tm) GS Software (C12KPRP-P-M), Version 12.0(32)SY6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
12k2
Because the Bug you mentioned is exactly what i have:
12k2sh diag
(...)
PEM 1 (AC_PWR_1): Failsafe PS
For all egress traffic, PFC QoS uses a configurable map to derive a CoS value from the final internal DSCP value associated with the traffic.
I understand, but what if your port is native? (ie. without 802.1p,
means without cos??) How does the router classify from unexisting cos?
Thanks for
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:10, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
oboeh...@cisco.com wrote:
yes, only supported for ebgp. Would be interested about the very
specific design and why Manu requires this functionality?
I'm not sure what Manu has in mind, but I had a need to use similar
feature to prevent
ttcp is also an option. It's a hidden command in most IOS
platforms/releases, and allows you to test TCP throughput. There's
also a UNIX version you can use to test between a router and a unix
box or between unix boxes. You can google for the code..
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Garry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Presence Denial of Service
Vulnerabilities
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20091014-cup
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 October 14 1600 UTC (GMT
Oli,
More detail:
I have a standard IP/MPLS backbone with MP-iBGP between PEs loopbacks with
IS-IS L2 or OSPF area 0 as IGP.
This IGP is extended to some non MPLS routers X.
In some backbone links failure, IGP allow MP-iBGP to stay UP via X links
(non MPLS).
This specific IGP design introduce
jeff,
at a previous employer, all the cisco 3750/3560 switches were scrapped
and replaced with 4948s or f10 s50n. the f10 had one of the worst
ncurses interfaces i've seen (but, now that they run sftos, the cli is
markedly improved). the buffer sizes on the small form-factor cisco
switches are
Manu Chao wrote:
Oli,
More detail:
I have a standard IP/MPLS backbone with MP-iBGP between PEs loopbacks with
IS-IS L2 or OSPF area 0 as IGP.
This IGP is extended to some non MPLS routers X.
In some backbone links failure, IGP allow MP-iBGP to stay UP via X links
(non MPLS).
I am running IS-IS :(
This feature is not yet supported but it is a good option
Thanks for your input
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:33 PM, David Freedman david.freed...@uk.clara.net
wrote:
Manu Chao wrote:
Oli,
More detail:
I have a standard IP/MPLS backbone with MP-iBGP between PEs
Manu,
More detail:
I have a standard IP/MPLS backbone with MP-iBGP between PEs loopbacks with
IS-IS L2 or OSPF area 0 as IGP.
This IGP is extended to some non MPLS routers X.
In some backbone links failure, IGP allow MP-iBGP to stay UP via X links
(non MPLS).
This specific IGP
How about explicit path TE with no autoroute announce (and only statics
for these dedicated iBGP loopbacks?)
Manu,
More detail:
I have a standard IP/MPLS backbone with MP-iBGP between PEs loopbacks with
IS-IS L2 or OSPF area 0 as IGP.
This IGP is extended to some non MPLS routers X.
Hi,
You can certainly have a look to the following page which
captures a number of NetFlow collector packages (free and
commercial) available around. I'm sure most of them are
supporting ASNs:
http://www.switch.ch/network/projects/completed/TF-NGN/floma/software.html
If you are looking at
Hi,
Has anyone successfuly configured the ASA5520 to accept VPN connections from
windows mobile 6.1 devices?
I can't figure out how to define a tunnel-group and google results aren't
helping much. I saw one example where you put the username/tunnel so
something like
Thank you Oli,
OSPF stub area or IS-IS Level 1 was the better option compared to ACL on the
non-MPLS router because routing control stay under MPLS backbone control
Increasing metric is useless because non MPLS path must NEVER be used
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
hi,
just wondered what folk did out there to monitor switch stacks
(eg stackwise+ switch stacks like 3750e, 2975gs etc (not the older
gigastack ones) ) - using the basic methods such as ICMP will
only show the presence of connectivity to the stack but not the
actual health of the stack - eg
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Alan Buxey wrote:
just wondered what folk did out there to monitor switch stacks
(eg stackwise+ switch stacks like 3750e, 2975gs etc (not the older
gigastack ones) ) - using the basic methods such as ICMP will
only show the presence of connectivity to the stack
Dale Carder-
Are you guys also monitoring queue drops on the interfaces too; if so
can you forward me the OID?
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0...@umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking Telecommunications Services
Dale W. Carder wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at
Hi,
I'm looking at the ES20+ cards for 7600s and I am confused by
the licensing options. There are two license options 76-ES+BASIC and
76-ES+ADVIP. Do I need to purchase one of these two options for each
ES20+ card or is it possible to run the card without either license? Is
each
Hey Ge!
We monitor for input queue drops on 6500's with this oid:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.276.1.1.1.1.10
Our alert for the NOC is drops 100/sec results in a
major alarm. Usually it's something stupid happening on
a given vlan that needs to be beat down. For SVI's, this
goes hand in hand with
Dale, are you guys monitoring queue drops on the edge switches like a
Cisco 3750? If so, I'm thinking the OID will be slightly different?
Thanks for the reply !
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0...@umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking Telecommunications
just wondered what folk did out there to monitor switch stacks
(eg stackwise+ switch stacks like 3750e, 2975gs etc (not the older
gigastack ones) ) - using the basic methods such as ICMP will
only show the presence of connectivity to the stack but not the
actual health of the stack - eg
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Webster, Andy
andy.webs...@illinois.gov wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at the ES20+ cards for 7600s and I am confused by
the licensing options. There are two license options 76-ES+BASIC and
76-ES+ADVIP. Do I need to purchase one of these two options
Dave,
Negative - the ppp doesn't even get to IPCP stage and defaultroute
is not turned on.
On another note, I tested a cisco and the LAC and it's working fine
with the same config so must be something with pppd/xl2tpd. I've
used this config before with l2tpns but never tried with IOS before.
I've got a customer that *needs* a 1-2 RU router that handles IPv6 in
hardware. I know the 3650/3750 can handle but I only need at most 4 SFP
ports. The ME-3400G-2CS-A is perfect. However I know IPv6 was just
added to this platform. Can anyone confirm the quality of IPv6
functionality on
I noticed the following on my cisco 6509E,
Switch02#dir ?
/all List all files
/recursive List files recursively
all-filesystems List files on all filesystems
bootflash: Directory or file name
const_nvram: Directory or file name
cwan1/0-disk0: Directory
On Oct 14, 2009, at 10:03 PM, ML wrote:
I've got a customer that *needs* a 1-2 RU router that handles IPv6
in hardware. I know the 3650/3750 can handle but I only need at
most 4 SFP ports. The ME-3400G-2CS-A is perfect. However I know
IPv6 was just added to this platform. Can anyone
Dale W. Carder wrote:
On Oct 14, 2009, at 10:03 PM, ML wrote:
I've got a customer that *needs* a 1-2 RU router that handles IPv6 in
hardware. I know the 3650/3750 can handle but I only need at most 4
SFP ports. The ME-3400G-2CS-A is perfect. However I know IPv6 was
just added to this
Thanks a lot Kevin, one more doubt pls, then what is the purpose of Flash in
Flexman?
Rgds/ Sony
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Kevin Graham
kgra...@industrial-marshmallow.com wrote:
My doubt are 1. whether these cwan1/0-disk0: and cwan1/1-disk0: are
builtin
flash modules on
On 2009-10-15 05:54, ML wrote:
Speaking of uRPF does anyone have it working at all on the ME3400. I've
yet to find a working configuration. Far as I can tell Cisco said they
had it but never delivered.
The hardware on ME3400 is not capable to perform uRPF check. Making
it in software would be
My doubt are 1. whether these cwan1/0-disk0: and cwan1/1-disk0: are builtin
flash modules on Flexwan module?
Yes.
2. if so can i upload my IOS in those modules
No. FlexWAN (as with all linecards) boots after the MSFC/Sup. Its devices
are inaccessible from either Sup or MSFC ROMMON.
44 matches
Mail list logo