It won't be on CCO until the first post 10.x release comes out. It FCS's in the
past month or so and stuff is showing up on PUT but isn't all there.
Upgrade is a refresh upgrade from any release b/c of switch to x64 Red Hat.
Otherwise upgrade process is like in the past.
Haven't done anything
| Facebook | Website | Email Support
From: cisco-voip [cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] on behalf of Matthew
Loraditch [mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 2:10 PM
To: Robert Kulagowski; Cisco VOIP
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip
So it may not be listed with version 10, but the v10 Attendant console IS
supported on 2012 server (not 2012 R2 though) ONLY in conjunction with CUCM 10
and that software still relies on the TSP...
Of course it wouldn't surprise me entirely if it was limited support only for
CUAC and thus
I know there is a license definition file for 10x CUCM and UCXN but I don't
believe it adds CER. For migration I think you just would rehost the ELM to the
PLM. I don't believe it's possible to restore a co-res ELM to standalone.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965
Well you can reorder edelivery in PUT, but I don’t think they ever ship SUs as
physical. Especially now with VMWare for everything half of the servers don’t
have DVD drives anymore. I have gotten a bootable SU from TAC in the past. I’d
open a case and say you need it and see what they do. It’s
Subs don't talk to ELM. Only the Pub talks.
You then have two possible setups, dedicated ELM/PLM and Colocated ELM/PLM with
CUCM or Unity Connection.
You also have one other scenario, rebuilding the Pub that you've mentioned.
If you have the VM Resources considering all the changes you are
Here is the scenario:
9951s are becoming un registered when we are on backup WAN Connectivity. Our
normal WAN is MPLS, backup is DMVPN over the internet. The 9951s randomly
unregister when the handset is picked up, when speaker phone is attempted to be
used, etc. The rest of the phones are
We use various combinations of MPLS, DMVPN, and Layer 2 WAN Services at our
clients. I have a very few dedicated Point to Point T1s left and no frame
relay.
I think I heard they actually took frame off of the latest R+S CCIE revision.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965
. 410.252.8830
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:33 PM
To: Erick Wellnitz; Wes Sisk (wsisk)
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SNR/Mobility Not Working for Transferred Calls with
User Control
DTMF
I enable alternate TFTP and then can't type anything in the fields??? The
selector goes down, but I hit the number keys and nothing types. New phone,
out of the box with 9.3.2 firmware. Any ideas? Of course this is the only
client where I can't just change DHCP myself...
Matthew G. Loraditch
|
Websitehttp://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email
Supportmailto:supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request
From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:47 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Is this essentially a question asking whether I want to do a true blind
transfer or not? Or is there more to it?
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
Why is this? I believe this was to replace that registry setting for direct
transfers, but when we set it, it is not staying. Am I missing something?
Very annoying.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:09 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Subject: RE: CUACA Advanced Settings for Transfer not Sticking
Hi Matthew,
Does the account that is logged in to the PC have permission to write to the
registry?
Cheers
Dana
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net
Is there a trick to this? Never deployed one, try hitting the hookflash and
instead of transferring lose the call.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [QUARANTINE] Re: Hookflash Transfer on 6901
its end of life
Regards
Andy
On 01/05/2014 15:49, Matthew Loraditch wrote:
Yes I read the directions, it's the timing of the hookflash press that is
messing us up, quickly isn't exactly a number
, 2014 11:31 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Digit Delay on 7 digit dialing
If you have only one 7-digit pattern to handle all the 7-digit calls, you are
right. If you have more, that changes things.
Any similar translation patterns?
Looks like CUCM is spending more
Doing some testing with 10.5 and seemed to come across something related to
this supposedly fixed bug. VMWare tools install doesn't fail, but tools aren't
running unless I do the install in permissive mode. Once installed and
enforcing mode is reenabled tools still works after a reboot.
Bug ID:
Everything I understand is that is still the case. It’s one of the reasons we
still have to run Lync internally.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
I know Unity Connection doesn't have dependency records, but is there a query
or a utility I don't know of, that can show what is referencing a mailbox? I've
got an account getting voicemails that it shouldn't but all the places that
I've looked aren't pointing to it... but something must be!
You can access them directly from the download page. I Know they weren't on the
regular doc page when I first looked, not sure about now.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
If they bought the correct BE6K server bundle it would have come with the right
RAM. It sounds like they got the wrong thing. I’d advise them to RMA and order
the BE6K-ST-BDL-K9= part as I’m guessing they purchased a build to order C220
M3 and it’s not going to have come with the right
We are having a regular but not always issue with a client, where they are not
hearing the ringing when dialing outbound on calls. These are SCCP 6945s to UCM
9.1.2 SIP Trunked to CUBE and then handoff to att's ipFlex service.
If anyone has some suggestions to look at before I spend time with
a 183 Session Progress, make sure the SIP Profile on the SIP Trunk has the
Rel1XX Options set to Send Prack if 18X contains SDP.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Loraditch
mloradi...@heliontechnologies.commailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
wrote:
We are having a regular
where did you access this from? doesn't pull up at all for me.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-V, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
There were issues rendering this gadget.
Unsupported scheme (must be http or https).
/cfadmin/gadgets/MediaPropertiesLayout.jsp
Every tab in the admin has the same type of error???
10.0.1SU1
Any ideas?
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:15 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Finesse Admin error
There were issues rendering this gadget.
Unsupported scheme (must be http or https).
/cfadmin/gadgets/MediaPropertiesLayout.jsp
9458 WRN 10:33:53.565705 CVM-http.ListenerHttpFailed: EMCC=true]
listener.httpFailed:
http://10.X:8080/emapp/EMAppServlet?device=SEP501CBFEMCC=true
9459 NOT 10:33:53.933852 CVM-XsiResponse::httpFailed: [thread=Extension
Mobility/1124995487 MQThread][class=cip.srvc.f] httpFailed:
Does one of these exist, I've seen one for Webex and ADFS, but I need one for
CUCM/UnityCxn/Jabber?
Looking for a step by step guide that includes everything on the ADFS side.
Google is failing me.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 8:34 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] SSO ADFS Guide?
Does one of these exist, I've seen one for Webex and ADFS, but I need one for
CUCM/UnityCxn/Jabber?
Looking for a step by step guide
UC Service Profile have the IMP server defined?
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-V, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296 |
Is there a way to push this setting out? Doesn't appear to be a reg key that I
can find.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
I'm trying 10.5 out a few smaller places and having no issues. My setups are
usually pretty vanilla, but most things are working ok. Did find a bug with
Single Inbox that is fixed in ES4 which won't be available until Friday.
CSCuo75357.
My single inbox isn't working and the bug is preventing
If you had to add Mime Types for .asp, etc, you probably don't all the proper
IIS components needed. I've never used the SDK but there are lots of optional
IIS items needed from the roles/features wizard that aren't there by default. I
would start there and check things involving ASP and
Has anyone seen something like this, Agents stay online and take calls, but
appear and disappear in Supervisor?
CCX 10.0SU1
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
From: Chris Ward (chrward) [mailto:chrw...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 7:50 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Video Greetings for Unity Cxn
Hi Matthew,
Can you let me know the versions of CUC and MS you are using? Also, does the
test button provide
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/68701/communications-manager-security-default-and-itl-operation-and-troubleshooting#Changing_Host_Names_or_Domain_Names
Take a look there, pretty much covers every scenario, I just did a multi-node
with ITL only for the same reasons as you and it worked
So apparently this is the new ATA model and 187s are End of Sale this year. Are
there any actual improvements between the 187 and this? Was it just a component
shortage, perhaps?
Thanks!
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice.
Does there exist a web front end developed by well anyone to access the
conversation logs? We are pretty much ready to switch from Lync to Jabber, but
the lack of client side logging is generating some angst. Lync's conversation
history was a great reference.
Matthew G. Loraditch -
All of the CUxAC except for Department have been merged to a single CUACA
(Cisco Unified Attendant Console Advanced) CUDAC migrates to CUAC Standard
which is more like the old Console. The 10.5 release of CUACA is 10.5
compatible. You are actually getting more features. CUACA is CUAC Premium
They are supported and the recommended scenario for SRSV now, but not supported
for CUCM fully yet. I believe there is DOD pilot going for on and Specs-based
may be supported, but the size thing Lelio mentions would come into play right
now for general use.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice,
https://communities.cisco.com/community/partner/collaboration/webex/webex_enabled_telepresence
If you've never done this before, take a look at the above. It's a bit of a
pain in the butt for the first one.
Not sure what the disti options are in Oz but here in the US, KBZ is certified
to do
When setting up your integration select the telephone number field to be used
as User ID.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
, August 28, 2014 10:54 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco voip
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM LDAP integration
Thanks Mathew for the tip.
The main reason behind the push for LDAP integration is to deploy Cisco Jabber
for everyone and I was thinking to use domain ID to login to jabber. The number
Are you saying they don’t show up in the search box or they don’t show up as
actual contacts?
If the former it appears you have a problem with your directory settings, what
are you using, UDS or LDAP?
If the latter, you could bulk import them in IMP but I’m not sure why you’d
want to do that.
I guess it depends on the size of the environment and does it involve an
upgrade at the same time.. I can tell you it takes me about 24 total hours of
work usually 3 business days to do a start to finish Physical to Virtual
migration of something physical to a BE6K environment. This is with
/Helion/252157915296 |
Websitehttp://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email
Supportmailto:supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request
Support Phone. 410.252.8830
From: Andrew Grech [mailto:agrec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 7:54 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Could I in theory run the cad configuration tool from a server with the same
version I want to use and just specify the IP info for the server I want to use
it on to generate a MSI that I could be deploying while I sit and sit and
sit... through the upgrade process?
Trying to think of a way to
You submit a manual case for all major upgrades now. Just like for 8 to 9.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
Pagan [mailto:dpa...@fidelus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:14 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: Received Call Logs for CCX Agents showing CTI Port
You might be referring to the CLI statement utils uccx icd clid enable. It
requires a restart of the UCCX
] On Behalf Of Anthony
Holloway
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: Daniel Pagan; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Received Call Logs for CCX Agents showing CTI Port
Is it possible they are receiving callback calls? Callback is designed in all
cases
I'm pretty sure this doesn't exist, but we had an issue yesterday and this
morning where a customer would have paid in gold if this was possible. Their
primary circuit was down in such a way that the normal backup routing was also
destroyed.
If it doesn't who wants to do a kickstarter?
Where do you see this? I don’t recall the step and didn’t do it on my test bed
and everything is working that I have tested. Now I’m curious.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Yes this is the bug, it is super fun… Migrated to a customer to 10.5 and
updated the certs.. spent a day finding out this was the bug.. I am eagerly
awaiting SU1.
Something to do with the sever being on multiple servers it continuously sends
the cert to the other servers which causes the change
Top Level Part: R-UCL-UCM-MIG-K9
Actual Part: MIG-9X-ESSTOENH
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
I have not had any problem with this. What exactly do you have license wise?
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitterhttp://twitter.com/heliontech |
Unity Connection 10.5SU1, trying to enable LDAP sync.. not working, no logs for
DirSync service, DirSync is activated and running.. just not doing anything..
Any hints on another log I can look at or am I calling TAC?
Thanks!
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring
: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 4:04 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: DirSync Not Generating Logs?
Utils network capture do you see traffic to ldap server?
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Wednesday
/252157915296 |
Websitehttp://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email
Supportmailto:supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request
From: Jason Aarons (AM) [jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:49 PM
To: Matthew
=Technical%20Support%20Request
Support Phone. 410.252.8830
From: Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 9:59 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch; Heim, Dennis; Jason Aarons (AM);
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5.1sr3 to sr4
You are using LDAP most likely. Kerberos would only come into play with SSO and
I doubt you are using that, it’s not fully baked until 10.5 and not even
present in 7.0.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax.
Looking for a sanitized copy of a config. Have a customer who is using them on
the existing PBX and now I need to get it onto CUBE. They have guides I think
for every open source type PBX on the planet and ye olde UC300/500 but nothing
for IOS. I found an old UC500 config on the support forums
You are supposed to select the drive to collaboration issue type for speedier
routing. I don’t think it does much at this point.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
I am having constant issues with the 10.5 editor. Sometimes it won't load, now
it won't open the repository. I've seen other various reports, does anyone have
any ideas?
Thanks!
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
I think this pretty much comes down to Josh is escalating because of customer
requirements for compliance. Once you are in Sev 2 you are going to get a
fairly quick response.
He is also doing the LCU cases and spending time on the frontend verifying what
his customer owns. This cuts down on
They have both existed since 10 but you were stuck with one or the other, with
10.6 you will be allowed to have both in production, there is a white paper
coming with details.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-V, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
We understand and solve your
technology challengers so
Wait and see, probably after the holidays
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-V, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
We understand and solve your
technology challengers so
you can sell and service cars.
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/HelionTech |
Maybe… I have something odd going on, but my pictures work? I added my internal
server to the http allow list and it works.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
Just shut down the controller.
Controller t1 x/x/x
Shutdown
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/HelionTech |
I had to open a TAC case because our wallboard stopped working. The ODBC
drivers in the 3.70 and 4.1 informix were not working. The TAC solution was to
somehow find me an ancient 3.0 version of the Informix SDK. It did start
working, but it just doesn't make sense and now our wallboard doesn't
://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home
| G+https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts
From: Justin Steinberg [mailto:jsteinb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 2:59 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Informix Drivers
I’ve seen it come two ways, riding your same MPLS circuit, in which case if you
have a dedicated VG you just default route that to your MPLS router and there
you go.
The other way is like you say and I’ve done that with att and I didn’t have to
route with them, they NAT’d everything on their
They have always done this. It's a bonus I suppose. Even when you buy a single
hostname cert they add www to it. A little lagniappe I suppose but a bit of
work in this case.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
When you are doing a rollout or adding new employee. do you do this if they are
completely new to IM ? Do you ask people for lists, do you have defaults groups
you provide based on depts., etc?
I've personally always liked just setting my stuff up myself, but wondering
what others do.
Thanks!
No CUIC is included and is just the replacement for HRC.
The included version is essentially the same as HRC but web based. There is a
premium option with more features available. That is, as expected, at a cost.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice:
Re: [cisco-voip] Consolidate two separate UCCX cluster and migrate to 9.x
Look for Abhirams email on 12/18/14 at 9:21PMEST
From that:
“The support for concurrent use of CAD and Finesse for UCCX is expected to be
announced in January (in all likelihood). Our internal testing has completed,
but
Were psychedelic implements involved? I’d have to guess the credit card machine
is also Ethernet or wireless and the user just didn’t know…
The aux port is only ever for headset peripherals in my understanding.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice:
This method doesn't work if you have the same hostname on the old and new
servers does it?
I'm trying and it's not letting me consolidate. It's a BE5K to 6K migration and
I want the same hostname for the CUCM for various reasons.
I guess I'm stuck with rollback, correct?
Matthew G. Loraditch -
FWIW the way I am reading that is it's only if your CCNP V is recent.
If you have an older one like me... well whatever year they make this a
requirement for partner stuff is going to suck.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-V, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
We understand and solve your
technology
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucmac/cuaca/10_5_2/install_admin_guide/CUACA1052WAG.pdf?mdfid=285974824
Page 28:
One of the following activated operating systems, with Windows regional
settings set to English:
- Windows Server 2008 R1 (32-bit)
- Windows Server 2008 R2
I believe it works like this:
The firmware updates immediately upon device package install, but isn't
available until TFTP is restarted. The device defaults are updated as well.
Just go into device defaults before you restart (since you do have to do a full
restart for new device models to
|
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296 |
Websitehttp://www.heliontechnologies.com/ | Email
Supportmailto:supp...@heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Sent
No need to activate SWSS. It is UCSS and ESW combined with all the behaviors
and attributes of Smartnet/ESW. I can't recall trying PUT with an ECMU yet, but
if it doesn't work you can submit a manual case and also ask why it's not
working for you.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-V, CCNA-RS, CCDA
You should have gotten another release key. Your BOM matches my BOMs and I get
3 PAKs, 2 release and 1 option key. For the RMS you may have gotten another,
I'm not sure, you will need the RMS license split though as 5 need to go on
each server. In the future you may want to split the RMS order
That would be amazing…
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/HelionTech |
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home
|
I'm not sure that interpretation is a correct description of the process. All
ssl certs indicate their issuer. As long as your device trusts that issuer, it
trusts certificates from that issuer.
For example if you go to https://www.cisco.com and look at their cert on a
window box you will see
Loraditch; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Expressway certificate advice required.
CUCM/Unity Multi-Server cert? Have you tried it recently with the
‘www.commonname” inserted as a SAN?
From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20
For what it’s worth, I use godaddy certs on our internal deployment and the one
customer I have done so far and they work fine without any issues.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
I'm not aware of a storage location. I don't know the internals, but you don't
manage files anymore, the entitlements are tied to your ELM/PLM instance
(whether dedicated or co-resident with on of your CUCM/UCXN boxes)
If you have a request you'd send TAC a license request along with whatever
I would please like the doc and the zip Andy and Dan!
Thanks much!
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-V, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
We understand and solve your
technology challenges so
you can sell and service cars.
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
A user being a CUWL user is based on the Owner User ID field alone. The user
could have 10 extension on 10 different phones. As long as the user is the
owner of all those phones you are legit.
From a completely technical standpoint the system calculates only on that field
and doesn’t care
As a guy with plenty of AD experience, I can tell you, you aren’t going to have
a problem with this. My internal systems were running this way at some point.
The Cisco BUs however are very cautious with this kind of thing and won’t list
it unless they test it.
The only time this could ever come
That is a bug you are hitting I believe. CSCup16883. There is a workaround of
running an SQL command to grant users correct perms, but it doesn't stick:
Identify users: run sql select * from Cuic_data:cuicuser
Set user with admin perms: run sql update cuic_data:cuicuser set cuicroles
='127'
He is saying Godaddy Certs have caused issues.
I have not seen that but others have, another thread somewhere in here
discusses what they were.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
It's due this summer. Watch for Rowan Trollope's keynote at Enterprise Connect
later this month.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+
-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip
Yes CUBE is a RTU license and honor based, as long as the UC license is active
you are good to go and the commands will be available.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
-technologies?trk=top_nav_home
| G+https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts
From: Bill Talley [mailto:btal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 3:46 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MediaSense Configuration
doh...
Make you set
Trying to setup a PoC for media sense internally to validate I can deploy at a
client for recording purposes... from what I can tell licensing is honor based?
Secondly from what I am reading this section of the documentation is all I have
to do:
://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home
| G+https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts
From: Chris Ward (chrward) [mailto:chrw...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 11:54 AM
To: Bill Talley; Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip
Expressway E should have a public cert on it.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-RS, CCDA
Network Engineer
Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl |
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/HelionTech |
1 - 100 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
