For routing based on ANI, Ryan Huff's suggestion will certainly help from the
perspective of CUCM. You can use this alongside CUC routing rules - route calls
from the 519 area code to a specific mailbox. If you know these callers from
area code 519 are dialing the same DNIS, then routing by ANI
It is a jump upgrade (we are moving from a pizza box to vmware), I am doing
the upgrade offbox to then import data to a 10.5.1 BE6K...
I have rebooted it dozens of times... there is just one server (I have
removed the other subs)...
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
>
Thanks Ryan
I have not done anything yet as the caller we want to route to the message is a
taxpayer so we need to get some approvals before we can implement.
From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Norm Nicholson; cisco-voip@puck.nether.ne
At the moment i have the same problem with a jump upgrade from 7.1.3.1-11
to 10.5.2. It also does not work to 10.5.1.
The same: Removed all subs, all network etc. is ok, NTP reachable and
synchronized and so on.
*arghl*
Von: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] Im Auftrag
Martin,
I have done a 7.1.3 to 10.5.1 before; I bit the bullet and setup PCD, and it
went off without a hitch.
Thanks,
Ryan
From: m...@bilobit.com
To: jonv...@gmail.com; ryanh...@outlook.com
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: AW: [cisco-voip] Upgrade 9.1.2 to 10.0 fails...
Date: Tue, 10
I would be interested in detailed CCM traces to answer a few questions... of
the top of my head:
Is an MTP being introduced into this call? Do you have bi-direction comm with
this MTP? I know you said other outbound calls are working but if the
destination/dialed party is on the same provider n
Martin,
In your case, it may also be worth checking, have you installed the refresh
upgrade COP file
(http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282204704/18582/ciscocm.refresh_upgrade_v1.5.pdf)?
Thanks,
Ryan
From: ryanh...@outlook.com
To: m...@bilobit.com; jonv...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:
Yeah, I a went thru the Cisco Live upgrade to 10 thing, it said PCD may be
the way to go... let me try it... see what it does...
J
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I have done a 7.1.3 to 10.5.1 before; I bit the bullet and setup PCD, and
> it went off without a
TO be honest, I have never gotten an upgrade to 10 to work... I always end
up doing an export, modifying the CSVs and importing to a clean 10.5 box...
it is kinda cool this doesn't work... made me learn a lot about Excel...
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Martin Schmuker wrote:
> A
HAH! Slick and cool... Two things I'm far, far from :) Unfortunately it took my
email below a full hour to be posted!
That's tricky if the desired behavior is to dial a UCCX trigger and, if the ANI
contains area code 519, only then should CUCM route the call to a specific
voicemail box. If this
I am pretty sure v8.6 is as far as you can go on a G5... just an FYI,
version 10 has no bare-metal installation...
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> OK, grasping at straws here, I know. I'm just trying to buy some (more)
> time before we dive into UC on UCS.
Doc on ANI-based call routing in UCCX:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/197424933/Cisco-UCCX-ANI-Based-Call-Routing#scribd
Norm can use this as a starting point assuming the call is routing into UCCX
already. But use the call redirect step instead of the set step specified in
the article. Use call red
Agreed.
CCM ANI call based routing is fantastic, works flawlessly once setup and then
you go a month and forget it was setup (because it works so flawlessly) and you
make an arbitrary change and BLAMO no ingress in the cluster.
Long story short, the CCM approach is great if you're committ
The G5 / H2 combo are listed as supported for version 9. We got it working on
others.
As it turns out, it is the firmware version. I found a lower rev card, put it
in, and it upgraded it fine. Trying to get a plan to downgrade the one we have
from 7.24 to 7.21 or lower.
And yes, painfully awa
Daniel,
There you go trying to make things slick and cool, lol! I like that approach!
So, it seems his need is that if only 1 particular DNIS dialed one particular
DN (a uccx trigger from my understanding) in ccm, that it then route the call
to a specific VM account; but that it would also allo
We are in the process of planning our upgrade from 8.6 to 10.5 which means we
need to plan for a conversion of our DLU’s to the new licensing model.
Does anyone know if a CUWL user license has to have the same extension on all
of their devices?
___
ci
No they don’t. It is all determined based on owner id for the most part. Be
prepared to find the Sales Order Numbers of your original order in order to
provide what you are entitled to. Depending how long those orders were made
determine how good of records Cisco has.
Dennis Heim | Emerging Tec
A user being a CUWL user is based on the Owner User ID field alone. The user
could have 10 extension on 10 different phones. As long as the user is the
owner of all those phones you are legit.
From a completely technical standpoint the system calculates only on that field
and doesn’t care about
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Does anyone has experience with VoIP system compliance with IRS Publication
1075 (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1075.pdf)? Specifically, IRS
requirements call for:
When FTI is in transit across the network (either Internet or state agency's
network), the VoIP traffic must be encrypted using a
Quick question...
vMotion of a shut down UCM between two hosts without shared storage using
vCenter. Is this supported? The virtualization document for UC platforms says
vMotion is supported on shared storage, so I figured to ask. Is this migration
method supported?
- Dan
___
Shutdown, yes. Running, no.
Thanks,
Ryan
Original Message
From: Daniel Pagan
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 05:06 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] vMotion w/o Shared Storage
>Quick question...
>
>vMotion of a shut down UCM between two hosts without share
If it's just for internally between 2 IP Phones, it's not too complicated
just putting the cluster into mixed-mode and pushing LSCs/using secure
profiles. It gets much more complicated when you need encryption for all
media resources/trunks/gateways.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Hunt, Fred -
Thanks - that’s what I figured and just tested with no issues. Seems the
non-shared storage caveat for vMotion is a non-issue in ESXi 5.1 and higher.
http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-51/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.vsphere.vcenterhost.doc%2FGUID-9F1D4A3B-3392-46A3-8720-73CBFA000A3C.html
I was als
Keep in mind that moving a VM from one host to another (whether the VM's
storage is being moved or not) is not considered a vMotion. That is why you
can do it even without enabling any NICs on the host for the vMotion
feature. Therefore, the VMWare feature you'd want to look for in the matrix
is pr
Thanks Dave. I also came across these details, but it too states shared storage:
“A Virtual Machine (VM) file on network/shared storage can be booted on any
physical server hosting ESXi that has access to that network shared storage.”
But perhaps my confusion was vMotion vs cold migration. My or
We loaded the gmail settings and we keep getting...
Test Result: Could not connect to SMTP host: smtp.gmail.com, port: 465
We can ping GMAIL from the CUE:
se-192-168-124-2# ping smtp.gmail.com
PING gmail-smtp-msa.l.google.com (74.125.193.109) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 74.125.193.109: i
Hi List,
I am working on to finalize the SBC vendor for one of our environments. I
have a couple of queries related to the SIP Trunk design and SBC vendor
choices(basically CUBE vs Acme Packet). I would really appreciate if anyone
with SIP Trunking/SBC expertise (Cisco/Acme Packet) can provide
Jonathan,
Have you applied any other cop or engineering special files besides the version
3 keys?
Is your cluster based on the unrestricted export version or the restricted
export version? Does the update your applying match (restricted versus
unrestricted)
Can you list out the specific versi
Check your NTP server’s status ‘utils ntp status’ – if any are inaccessible,
remove them. Also ‘utils diagnose test’ is good to run as well.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Charles
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:06 AM
To: Andrew Grech
Cc: Ci
I have been asked to send an outside caller to a voicemail box so when the DNIS
or ANI shows 519-XXX- I want that caller to go to a specific mailbox. Is
this possible ?
Thanks
Norm Nicholson
Telecom Analyst
City of Kitchener
(519) 741-2200 x 7000
Could you tell me what version of CCM you are dealing with? If you go under
Call Routing -> Translation Pattern and click "Add New", do you see "Route Next
Hop By Calling Party Number"?
Thanks,
Ryan
From: norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:43:
Anyone noticing problems on 7841 SIP phones when calling outbound with
a SIP provider?
When we call Microsoft Conference bridge it connects but we can't hear
the bridge.
It works fine from a SCCP phone on same Call Manager and same SIP trunk.
All other calls work on the 7841 outbound.
CUCM Versio
If you have a modern CCM version (8.x or above), which I'm guessing you are
indicating such by the subject line of the email, you can create a scenario
where CCM can perform routing decisions based upon the calling party number.
Please review this post:
http://ryanthomashuff.com/2014/11/call
is the MCB onnet or offnet?
Thanks,
Ryan
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:20:16 -0500
> From: erick...@gmail.com
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 7841 SIP Phone audio issues on some calls
>
> Anyone noticing problems on 7841 SIP phones when calling outbound with
> a SIP pro
Great info and one more question
Can we do this on specific CCX pilot # s ( they are DID's ) verses every call
this number makes to our call manager?.
Thanks
From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 9:26 AM
To: Norm Nicholson; cisco-voip@puck.nethe
I applied the RSA cop file... the version from is 9.1.2.11900-12
I have tried going to:
10.0.1.11900-2
10.5.1.1-7
Same errors every time.
All of them are the non-bootable ISO.
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Ryan Huff wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> Have you applied any other cop or
I'm not sure I correctly understand your question. Are you asking if instead of
routing the calling number directly to a VM account, route to a UCCX queue
trigger?
Thanks,
Ryan
From: norm.nichol...@kitchener.ca
To: ryanh...@outlook.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fo
In your email below it seemed you were trying an update from 10.0.1 to 10.5.1
If you are coming FROM 9.1.2, you may be hitting this bug
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCup45923
On page 3 of the 9.1.2 SU2 release notes
(http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074295/113937/cucm-readme-912su
OK, grasping at straws here, I know. I'm just trying to buy some (more) time
before we dive into UC on UCS.
I've got a pile of HP DL380G5s that I'm trying to retrofit into a 7845H2 swonly
equivalent. All the parts are the same as far as I can tell, I only had to swap
in two older XEON 5140 CP
There is on NTP server and it is accessible.
Everything passed on the utils diagnose test thing... (didn't run the
modules that needed to be run directly)
Jonathan
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Kevin Przybylowski
wrote:
> Check your NTP server’s status ‘utils ntp status’ – if any are
> in
Sorry the incoming phone number we want to route to a voicemail box, but only
when it calls in on a specific CCX pilot # . They should be allowed to call
all other numbers and DID's within our Call Manager.
Thanks
From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Yes you can do that, but it gets a bit more tricky, and since your dealing with
a CCX trigger, you could probably script something in uccx just as easy.
If you want to do this in CCM though, put on a hard hat and lets get to it ...
Assuming you've already read and deployed the previous example
43 matches
Mail list logo
