ou would like to start using DEMS,
> please email Doc2disk Ltd for prices (sa...@doc2disk.com).
>
>
>
> _______
>
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-use
Am 30.10.19 um 03:34 schrieb Paul Kosinski via clamav-users:
> I thought ClamAV unpacked TARs (and other archives) and looked at the
> contents. If it doesn't, it wouldn't be very effective in detecting
> viruses in compressed files.
Yes it does, but IIUC it matches signatures not only to the
Am 25.02.19 um 19:44 schrieb G.W. Haywood via clamav-users:
> Just as decimal strings are strings composed of decimal digits and can
> be any length, hexadecimal strings are strings composed of hexadecimal
> digits - and can also be any length. They usually present as an even
> number of digits
Am 28.01.19 um 18:02 schrieb G.W. Haywood:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> On 1/25/19 11:38 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
>
>> > ... I'd call it madness.
>>
>> Sometimes it is a management or compliance requirement.
>
> Are these not just synonyms?
Not quite, though often quite close.
Do not run clamscan over your entire filesystem.
It's a bad idea.
In your case clamscan found something looking like a virus in its own
signatures, which is hardly surprising and certainly not a sign of an
infection.
Am 04.01.19 um 13:28 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan:
>
> when i am running clamscan
Since yesterday, ClamAV started to report:
[clamAV_Log 20.12.2018 23:00:01]
[clamAV_Log 20.12.2018 23:00:01]
---
[clamAV_Log 20.12.2018 23:00:01]
[clamAV_Log 20.12.2018 23:00:01] /var/log/sid_changes.log:
Am 29.10.18 um 17:33 schrieb Kris Deugau:
> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
>>> For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
>>> *.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
>>
>> Surely
Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
> For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
> *.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
Surely you meant to write "*.docx,*.xlsx,*.pdf"?
*.doc and *.xls are the old, malware-prone MS-Office filetypes.
You don't want to
Am 23.08.2018 um 01:56 schrieb Michael Newman:
> What I didn’t understand was why using sudo caused dns and network
> errors but using freshcalm without sudo worked fine:
You wouldn't have SELinux active in enforcing mode on that machine by
any chance?
--
Tilman Schmidt
cardtech Card
Am 08.08.2018 um 10:40 schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
> Am 07.08.2018 um 22:24 schrieb Alain Zidouemba:
>> We do not have the sample. Please submit here, even though it's not
>> malicious: http://www.clamav.net/reports/malware
>
> Done.
Starting Saturday the file is now report
c (0 m 15 s)
Thanks,
Tilman
Am 07.08.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
>
> $ sha256sum .java/deployment/cache/6.0/6/41d72bc6-799a1944
> 97432da2d77d78872ececf4de2eef1c759e7846db85d4fb14eb02764b6bd02ad
> .java/deployment/cache/6.0/6/41d72bc6-799a1944
>
[...]
>>
>>
Am 08.08.2018 um 10:40 schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
> JFTR it did. Total runtime was
>
>> Time: 34574.821 sec (576 m 14 s)
>
> which is pretty much exactly 144*24ms
>
> Seems the default --bytecode-timeout is really much smaller than the
> 6ms mentioned in
Am 07.08.2018 um 22:24 schrieb Alain Zidouemba:
> We do not have the sample. Please submit here, even though it's not
> malicious: http://www.clamav.net/reports/malware
Done.
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Tilman Schmidt <mailto:tschm...@cardtech.de>> wrote:
>
&g
e already have it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Alain
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Tilman Schmidt <mailto:tschm...@cardtech.de>> wrote:
>
> The problem is back, this time with two bytecodes: 2 and 90.
> ClamAV version is 0.100.1.
> The last clamsc
have
> a bytecode signature could also cause the default timeout to be exceeded.
>
> Cheers,
> Micah
>
> Micah Snyder
> ClamAV Development
> Talos
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>
>
>> On Jul 9, 2018, at 4:51 AM, Tilman Schmidt > <mailto:tschm...@cardtech.de&
This morning, a bunch of RHEL6 systems greeted me with mails saying:
/etc/cron.daily/freshclam:
ERROR: During database load : LibClamAV Warning: RWX mapping denied:
Can't allocate RWX Memory: Permission denied
I found an old Red Hat Bugzilla entry (Bug 1172774) for Fedora 21 which
was closed as
gt;
> It isn't entirely surprising that a more complex file for which we have
> a bytecode signature could also cause the default timeout to be exceeded.
>
> Cheers,
> Micah
>
> Micah Snyder
> ClamAV Development
> Talos
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>
>
>> O
omit", "erase", "do not use".
Just change "-ri" to "-r" in your command line and try again.
You'll see that clamscan will print all files, whether infected or not.
It will even print "OK" after those that aren't.
> Tilman Schmidt napsal(a)
v|WMV|ts|TS|flv|FLV|mov|MOV|JPG|jpg|mp3|MP3|tc)
> that are very big, that may cause this, but I might forget something
> other big too.
>
> Thank you
> Pavel Kosina
>
>
>
> Tilman Schmidt napsal(a) dne 9.7.2018 v 10:27:
>> I've been trying in vain to get an ans
t; I suspect they would have figured it out by now.
>
> -Al-
> ClamXAV User
>
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 01:27 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> I've been trying in vain to get an answer on that one since 2018-06-20.
>> For me it's bytecode 73, otherwise the same.
>> Looks
I've been trying in vain to get an answer on that one since 2018-06-20.
For me it's bytecode 73, otherwise the same.
Looks like no-one knows or cares.
I ended up bisecting the scan and removing the file whose scan triggered
the message.
Luckily it wasn't needed for the operation of the affected
Just to let you know:
The daily messages have become too annoying so I cleared my Java cache
to get rid of the offending file.
Consequently I won't be available for testing a fix anymore, at least
until the problem reappears on some other file.
Am 25.06.2018 um 11:12 schrieb Tilman Schmidt
These are strange questions.
Am 05.07.2018 um 07:59 schrieb "조정환":
> Hello, I am using ClamAV for my organization, but I am using it only on
> the VM server.
I assume that by "the VM server" you mean a server which is running as a
virtual machine, or perhaps even several of them. If not, please
Am 04.07.2018 um 15:42 schrieb Walter H.:
> On 04.07.2018 15:00, Matt Vander Werf wrote:
>> This has been mentioned at various points in several threads over the
>> past week or two (sometimes off-hand), but just wanted to somewhat
>> consolidate them here and also add my +1 to getting this bug
; ___
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>
>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>
> http
-2cd5ef82
~/.java/deployment/cache/6.0/6$ file 41d72bc6-2cd5ef82
41d72bc6-2cd5ef82: Java archive data (JAR)
Any thoughts?
Am 20.06.2018 um 10:41 schrieb Tilman Schmidt:
> The last nightly ClamAV scan on one of my machines emitted a series of
> error messages I'm not familiar with:
>
> LibCl
Am 20.06.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Andrew McGlashan:
> This is an opportunity to fix things, such an opportunity should not
> lost, especially if it helps more people to understand the problems with
> having too liberal SPF rules (defeating the purpose of SPF).
I disagree. The purpose of
The last nightly ClamAV scan on one of my machines emitted a series of
error messages I'm not familiar with:
LibClamAV Warning: [Bytecode JIT]: Bytecode run timed out, timeout flag set
LibClamAV Warning: [Bytecode JIT]: recovered from error
LibClamAV Warning: [Bytecode JIT]: JITed code
Am 19.06.2018 um 04:17 schrieb Jobst Schmalenbach:
> Receiving the message: WARNING: Local version: 0.99.4 Recommended version:
> 0.100.0
[...]
> Listing epel shows:
>
> clamav-0.99.4-1.el6.i686.rpm 2018-03-02 17:32
> 4.4M
> clamav-0.99.4-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Am 23.05.2018 um 18:07 schrieb G.W. Haywood:
> My advice would be a more general "use your loaf". :)
Cute idiom. I had to google that. :-)
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
about the threat.
What is that signature trying to detect?
Is this a Known Problem?
What's the best way handle it?
--
Tilman Schmidt
Head of System and Network Engineering
Tel. 0221 / 95 64 95 .417
Fax 0221 / 95 64 95 .999
e-Mail tschm...@cardtech.de
cardtech
Card & POS Service GmbH
Ric
What definitely isn't fine is this endless griping about how people
should phrase their questions differently, know more than they do, have
read this and that (blindly assuming that they hadn't) and so on which
contributes exactly nothing to a solution.
What isn't fine either is rude language.
Am 26.01.2018 um 17:13 schrieb Martin Gagne:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> =20
>
> Can you please help me getting a copy of 24255 ?
> =20
> Thanks !
>
> =20
>
> =20
>
> Best regards, Martin Gagne
Don't go that way. It's much better to add the signature
Vbs.Downloader.Generic-6431223-0 which is causing
Ubuntu doesn't have 0.99.3 release yet.
You need to go to http://www.clamav.net/downloads
Am 26.01.2018 um 15:31 schrieb Chris:
> On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 19:18 -0800, Al Varnell wrote:
>> Are you sure you have the correct 0.99.3 download released late today
>> from
Try
# service clamav-freshclam stop
The exact command may vary depending on your OS and distribution which
you didn't mention.
Am 26.01.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Rajesh M:
> hi all
>
> even though i removed
>
> daily.cld
> main.cld
> bytecode.cld
> mirrors.dat
>
> all of these has been
Am 26.01.2018 um 11:36 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 26.01.2018 um 11:28 schrieb Andreas Schulze:
>>
>> just updated to 0.99.3 ( which is a 0.99.2 + Security fixes ) bit
>> still clamav don't work as expected.
>>
>> Fri Jan 26 11:23:10 2018 -> ERROR: accept() failed:
>> Fri Jan 26 11:23:10 2018 ->
Am 22.01.2018 um 15:08 schrieb Personal:
> I have a clamscan running once a week as:'clamscan -rv
> --exclude-dir="^/sys" / | grep FOUND >> filename.txt'
You should fix that grep pattern. It's too unspecific.
> I have gotten the following hits back for the last three weeks and
> wondered, if
ClamAV running on Ubuntu Xenial, package version
0.99.2+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.2, emits the following warning message when
scanning one of my Thunderbird IMAP mail folders:
LibClamAV Warning: Unsupported message format `http' - if you believe
this file contains a virus, submit it to www.clamav.net
or anyone in my virtual
vicinity. :-)
IOW, please don't claim you represent the majority without
substantiation.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build
to MacOSX.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Preferences.
where is it ?, apple is imho not worse then android when it comes to
control off spyware and poision of mobile phones, but how to make cvd
files would be nice to see in wiki, hopefully this is possible to make,
no ?
[...]
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
Am 16.03.2012 13:35, schrieb Andreas Schulze:
2.
Avira, a german antivirus vendor, may(*) classify the sourcecode tarball as
malicious:
clamav-0.97.4/test/.split/split.clam-pespin.exeaa PCK/PESpin ; packer ;
File has been compressed with an unusual runtime compression tool
A shot in the dark: is your freshclam really running as user clamav?
Fun story: not so long ago I encountered a CentOS system where automatic
update had switched to a ClamAV package from a different repo which had
been compiled to run as user clam instead of clamav. Took me a while
to spot ...
it kindly when virus scanners operate on their
innards.
HTH
Tilman
- --
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Yavuz Maşlak schrieb:
Is your proftpd running chrooted?
Yes I running proftpd as chrooted. when I remove chrooted, proftpd will
run with clamd.
Ok, that explains it.
In that case you'll have
to put clamd.sock somewhere inside its chroot jail, and
strip the chroot path from the
): No such file or
directory
Is your proftpd running chrooted? In that case you'll have
to put clamd.sock somewhere inside its chroot jail, and
strip the chroot path from the ClamLocalSocket parameter.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
/clamscan is not owned by any package
[...@gimli ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/sbin/sendmail
sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5
shows that ClamAV was installed from source on that machine,
while Sendmail came from the EL5 package.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description
gone, AFAICS there are also spurious characters in there. How do you
access that machine?
I did re-install 0.95.1 from source to no avail.
Did you make surer that the config files were re-installed too?
Normally the ClamAV installation will leave existing config
files alone.
HTH
--
Tilman
/sys, /proc, or /dev. Their contents
are not actual files, but portals to internal data structures of the
operating system, and reading or writing them may cause a wide variety
of side effects. Scanning these for viruses doesn't make any sense and
may cause system malfunctions.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman
***
*** ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio is DEPRECATED ***
*** ArchiveBlockMax is DEPRECATED ***
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ fgrep ArchiveMax /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Bug? Feature?
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
wasn't applied.
Did you verify that the line added by that hunk, which declares the
variable use_stderr, does appear in shared/output.h after applying
the patch?
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to Scanned files: 0 and add a new count to the summary
Not scanned: 1.
I'd like to support that suggestion.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV
it will by default permanently associate
with that suffix, and then it isn't unassigned anymore.
So no suffix you try to put aside will ever be safe from being assigned
to an application, either by the application's author or by individual
users.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
reluctant
to declare all IRC server based programs possibly unwanted.
Actual malware OTOH should be caught by the regular (non-PUA)
signatures already. Again, it all depends on the precise
definition of what would or would not go into that category.
jm2c
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
might flag as infected,
I cannot risk enabling it on a production system. So my answer to
these questions is nothing, none, and I don't know.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Steve Basford wrote:
I've knocked something quickly together, it won't be 100% accurate and is
very vague, but it might give you a few pointers:
Thanks a lot, that's very helpful already.
Perhaps this could be put on the Wiki, and over time, expanded.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
error
Sep 5 02:36:43 posthamster freshclam[14586]: Trying again in 5 secs...
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http
doing something wrong. But what?
Thanks in advance for any hints.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
. Blocking a customer's internet
connection based on such a check is inacceptable.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Adolf-Hombitzer-Str. 12
xargs.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Steve Wray schrieb:
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
[...]
So dropping mail into the bitbucket is not an alternative. I have to
either reject it or deliver it.
Wow.
So... the default, unpatched build of qmail is quite popular in Germany?
I won't enter that minefield. :-)
But unpatched qmail
German access provider. Their outgoing
mailservers do resend mail on a 4xx error - but only after a delay of
eight hours. That sort of delay is quite enough to upset many users.
But Arcor's tech support doesn't see a problem with that. They even
maintain it's RFC compliant.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix
in the fight against spam ...)
So dropping mail into the bitbucket is not an alternative. I have to
either reject it or deliver it.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us
David F. Skoll schrieb:
OK, look. I guess I need to spell it out for you.
End-user PC has virus. Virus does this:
telnet isps-smtp-server 25
In my experience that's very unusual behaviour for a virus.
The vast majority try to connect directly to the recipient's MX.
--
Tilman Schmidt
0.93, and indeed I haven't seen
it reoccur with 0.93 or 0.93.1.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
.
Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH, Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Eric Rostetter schrieb:
Quoting John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is not ClamAV's place to make policy decisions for
me.
And ClamAV does not. The milter is.
That distinction is immaterial. The milter comes as part of the ClamAV
package. s/ClamAV/clamav-milter/ throughout my posting if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 14.04.2008 16:30 schrieb Michael Brown:
The | character is not allowed in any e-mail address because it's a Unix
shell reserved character.
RFC 2822 disagrees with you. To begin with, there's no reason reserved
characters of any Unix shell or
. Please
don't do it.
Thanks,
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Adolf-Hombitzer-Str. 12Fax +49 228 97199 99
53227 Bonn, Germany www.phoenixsoftware.de
signature.asc
Description
Tarak Ranjan schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 18:18 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Tarak Ranjan schrieb:
Hi List,
How can i configure my clamd , that will scan all my incoming mails
attactments,...
Install the appropriate mail filter extension for your mail software,
and configure it to use
weren't either.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Adolf-Hombitzer-Str. 12Fax +49 228 97199 99
53227 Bonn, Germany www.phoenixsoftware.de
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Tarak Ranjan schrieb:
Hi List,
Has anyone got this virus Trojan.Maliframe!html. it's not detecting
in my clamd , for this any definition in clamav
AFAIK that's not a virus, but Symantec's generic name for their
malicious HTML code detection heuristics.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix
) still don't
have a 0.92 package. Are there any plans for providing one?
Thanks
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Geschäftsführer: W. Grießl
ClamAV 0.92 refuses being compiled with because of a compiler bug.
So I thought I'd take the easy way out and convert ClamAV on those
machines running Suse 10.0 from self-compiled to RPM installed.
Thanks
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH www.phoenixsoftware.de
?
Then you should be able to compile the ClamAV 0.92 your own.
Sure, if that's the only way then I'll do it that way.
Thanks,
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH www.phoenixsoftware.de
53227 Bonn, GermanyAmtsgericht Bonn HRB 2934
by default.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Geschäftsführer: W. Grießl Fax +49 228 97199 99
Adolf-Hombitzer-Str. 12
prone to false
positives than classic signature based virus detection.
But if you set the PhishingScanURLs configuration option to No
you should be fine - certainly better than staying with 0.88.
HTH
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
53227 Bonn, Germany
signature.asc
Description
Kelson schrieb:
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Also, OpenOffice on Linux is normally run from a non-privileged user ID,
heavily limiting the ability of any malicious macro to harm or propagate.
Huh? What difference does running as a non-privileged user make when
the method of infection
John Rudd schrieb:
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
(Remember the viruses ClamAV checks for
are *Windows* viruses. A unixoid OS doesn't run ClamAV for its own
protection but for the protection of Windows clients.)
OpenOffice isn't vulnerable to Office Macro viruses?
AFAIK, no. Kaspersky has claimed
.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Geschäftsführer: W. Grießl
owner hands you the correct fingerprint
and you check his/her ID, but depending on your security concerns (or lack
thereof), other more or less trusted channels such as a publication in a
printed magazine or book may be sufficient.
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL
2 rootroot 80 Oct 17 08:55 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 rootroot 232 Oct 17 06:56 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 justlgn users 69 Oct 16 10:56 eicar.com
The EICAR test file itself, however, is again owned by you.
What user are you running clamscan as?
HTH
T.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
to cause future problems on an rpm
based system.
I run a couple of RPM based systems here but always compile ClamAV from
source. Never saw any of those guaranteed problems. Should I ask my
money back? :-)
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Now that this dead horse has been beaten into pulp and is slowly seeping
into the gravel, can we please, pretty please leave that fruitless
discussion?
Thank you very much for your understanding.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
of this information.
Oh, PLEASE ...
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228 97199 0
Geschäftsführer: W. Grießl
platforms are affected? Which usage?
Do I understand correctly that using ClamAV via the clamscan command
isn't affected? What about access through the socket interface?
Thanks
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
.
Forgive me for being dense, but I still don't understand: what exactly
am I to achieve by not upgrading, if it's not the continued safety of
my servers?
Thanks
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Tilman Schmidt
was empty!br/Nah, your mailreader is
broken!/echo
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phoenix Software GmbH Tel. +49 228
anything, just configured it for compiling.
As a next step, type make - that'll start the actual compilation.
After that, type make install to have the compiled program copied
to a location where it'll be found when someone tries to run it.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Abteilungsleiter Technik
Steve Holdoway schrieb:
I'm trying to find the changelog for 0.91.1. Can anyone point me towards it?
I had to search a bit too but finally found them the SourceForge download area:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=523634group_id=86638
HTH
--
Tilman Schmidt
90 matches
Mail list logo
