On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:24:24PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Luca Berra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
magic wrote:
Which version did you install -1mdk or -2mdk?
-2mdk
When you do an ldd command on postfix, what does it show?
(This is with 9.1 install - postfix-2.0.6-1mdk):
[EMAIL
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4073
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-06 10:41 ---
Looks like it's trying to read the configuration file and fails. Could you
please try to remove your ~/.xine directory? Xine often has problems with it's
settings, so
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-06 11:34 ---
problem still exists.please someone find a solution quick cos it makes you
sometimes shutdown uncleanly which results a new installation after a few
times.it is my 4-5
andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 16 June 2003 11:18, François Pons wrote:
Another problably good approach would be using compssUsers file, as no lib
package are listed as only effective packages (for the user) are inside it.
François.
What about lib$something-devel and
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3558
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-06 11:46 ---
problem still exists.please someone find a solution quick cos it makes you
sometimes shutdown uncleanly which results a new installation after a few
times.it is my 4-5
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I find it weird though that RH has not even considered packaging
perl-URPM/urpmi (maybe they suffer from not-invented-here-syndrome?).
If you look at perl-URPM code, you will see a lot of imported rpm code due to
*really* weird things since 4.2 (compared
magic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this is the cooker, but is this package also be
considered as an upgrade for 9.1 (isn't this a base package)?
No, no cooker package are suitable for upgrading 9.1, or it's
unsupported. It breaks too much.
I am running a 9.1 base with db4.1
Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Lundi 16 Juin 2003 17:52, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
It would be better that rpmdrake also show already-installed software,
maybe greyed out or with a mention this software is already installed
on your machine.
No, it's a long
Hi.
Suddenly I get:
RPM build errors:
Could not open %files file
/home/oden/RPM/BUILD/httpd-2.0.46/debugfiles.list: No such file or directory
???
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3729
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3558
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-06 13:59 ---
I noticed that this happens when in addition to being logged in graphical mode I am
also
logged at the 1st text console (i.e. on the one available through CRL-ALT-F1
So, with current tools, a newbie may not find the software needed, only
because it is already installed. It happens. Isn't that sad ?
I think the vast majority of those cases are not happening
because those applications are so large they don't get unnoticed
by the user (e.g. whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne wrote:
Our local mirror mirrors off sunet.se, and is about a week behind (it
seems). It seems sunet.se is the problem:
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-devel/
No files newer than 6 June AFAICS.
Since this server
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task, isn't it? I launche installing
software when I want to install software..
Perhaps to see the description of current installed packages.
Even if
tisdagen den 17 juni 2003 13.26 skrev Buchan Milne:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne wrote:
Our local mirror mirrors off sunet.se, and is about a week behind (it
seems). It seems sunet.se is the problem:
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-devel/
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task, isn't it? I launche installing
software when I want to install software..
GC, we have talked
This SRPM is missing two patches:
815 kdebase-3.1.2-fix-mem-leak-kcontrols-keys.patch.bz2
816 kdebase-3.1.2-fix-konsole-mem-leak.patch.bz2.
Arn
tisdagen den 17 juni 2003 13.44 skrev Oden Eriksson:
tisdagen den 17 juni 2003 13.26 skrev Buchan Milne:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne wrote:
Our local mirror mirrors off sunet.se, and is about a week behind (it
seems). It seems sunet.se is the problem:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
GC, we have talked about this before. You are not easily convinced but
the
issue keeps coming up. If you really want to know, post a poll on
mandrakeclub (or do a telephone poll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Walser wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Why? I don't think anyone suggested that they wanted to package a
program which required perl-OpenGL, did they?
Look two messages back from me in this thread.
I searched on freshmeat for such a program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
magic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this is the cooker, but is this package also be
considered as an upgrade for 9.1 (isn't this a base package)?
No, no cooker package are suitable for upgrading 9.1, or it's
Le Tuesday 17 June 2003 14:08, AAW a écrit :
This SRPM is missing two patches:
815 kdebase-3.1.2-fix-mem-leak-kcontrols-keys.patch.bz2
816 kdebase-3.1.2-fix-konsole-mem-leak.patch.bz2.
Arn
Strange ...
It's right this two patchs is missing :(
So I will rebuild a kdebase to regenerate SRPMS/
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:15:51 +0200 (CEST)
Marcel Pol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Contrib-RPM]
Name: abiword Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.0.6 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk Build Date:
* Tue Jun 17 2003 François Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4.4-2mdk
- fixed parallel handler with removing.
- build transaction set just before starting downloading and
installing packages.
- fixed glitches with gurpmi.
- fixed bad test report.
- fixed bad transaction ordering and splitting on
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 14:55, Marcel Pol a écrit :
Also, abiword and abiword2 both provide abiword. Upgrading abiword works
fine. But when I urpmi abiword2, it deinstalls abiword (1). The packages
don't conflict, so apparently it has to do with both packages providing
abiword.
rpm bug explain
Olivier Thauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 14:55, Marcel Pol a écrit :
Also, abiword and abiword2 both provide abiword. Upgrading abiword works
fine. But when I urpmi abiword2, it deinstalls abiword (1). The packages
don't conflict, so apparently it has to do with both
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task, isn't it? I launche installing
software when I want to install
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Think a bit further, currently rpmdrake has an easy interface, but
not a
friendly one. (Look at some Mac software). rpmdrake has become quite
nice,
but it is sometimes not suited for the things many users want.
And of course, at present
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
magic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this is the cooker, but is this package also be
considered as an upgrade for 9.1 (isn't this a base package)?
No, no cooker package are suitable for upgrading 9.1, or it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Note the would install {null} instead of... lines.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cooker]# urpmi urpmi
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (2 MB):
perl-URPM-0.91-1mdk.i586
urpmi-4.4-1mdk.noarch
Is this OK? (Y/n) y
The
On 17 Jun 2003 15:17:08 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote:
Olivier Thauvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 14:55, Marcel Pol a écrit :
Also, abiword and abiword2 both provide abiword. Upgrading abiword works
fine. But when I urpmi abiword2, it deinstalls
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And of course, at present rpmdrake can only be run as root. If it were
Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've
said I would add it, I've added it on May 28,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ rpm --eval %_host
i686-pc-linux-gnu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ cat /home/users/bgmilne/.rpmrc
buildarchtranslate: i386: i586
buildarchtranslate: i486: i586
buildarchtranslate: i586: i586
buildarchtranslate: i686: i586
In current
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 11:57, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task, isn't it? I launche installing
software when I want to install software..
You are
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
But, I think especially in this mode it needs to search packages, since
the admin will know what he installed, users not.
Argh you're harsh on me.
BTW, menu options only start in user mode, I assume then for
installation, rpmdrake should be
Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 11:57, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task, isn't it? I launche installing
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ rpm --eval %_host
i686-pc-linux-gnu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ cat /home/users/bgmilne/.rpmrc
buildarchtranslate: i386: i586
buildarchtranslate: i486: i586
buildarchtranslate: i586: i586
buildarchtranslate: i686: i586
In
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 10:02, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 11:57, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task, isn't it? I launche
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4073
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-06 17:01 ---
I can confirm this bug. Also happens with gxine. Maybe it's gcc 3.3 related?
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
Guillaume Cottenceau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Kulagowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note the would install {null} instead of... lines.
I think it means the action would be to install, instead of
upgrading.
YES ! IANAGESM
François.
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've
^ haha, I think Buchan was a bit too annoying?
said I would add it, I've added it on May 28, but you didn't even
notice :(.
I didn't see it as well, thanks!
d.
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 16:26, Guillaume Cottenceau a écrit :
contacts with newbies and sometimes I feel a lack of patience with them !
But newbies are our new users and we have to take care of them.
Ask for some people in the street to test Mandrake 9.1. Experience this.
Sure you'll be
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4074
Product: gnome-db2.0
Component: packaging
Summary: mergeant needs gnome-db2.0 to function properly
Product: gnome-db2.0
Version: 0.12.2-1mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2822
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Sorry for the so long delay in answering..
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 16 May 2003 18:26, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
why not deciding on $kernel like you do for deciding if
bootsplash need be disabled?
It is needed anyway. It is impossible to just parse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've
^ haha, I think Buchan was a bit too annoying?
No, it's that other times he's right.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
More weirdness: it tried to install twice, with the second time
failing because it had already installed the first time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] docs]# urpmi linuxdoc
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (5 MB):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well RPM builds for %_target_platform, not for %_host -- but I'm
not sure that was your question :/.
Thanks, I think it's what I was looking for, and rpm --showrc|grep
mandrake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, I think especially in this mode it needs to search packages, since
the admin will know what he installed, users not.
Argh you're harsh on me.
Only because we want Mandrake
Le Mardi 17 Juin 2003 18:14, Buchan Milne a écrit :
Only because we want Mandrake to be the best :-)
s/Mandrake/gc/ here :)
--
Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer
une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL.
Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 19:42, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Sorry for the so long delay in answering..
this one is using awk. Frankly speaking I think it is much easier to just
add
Ouch it's long and extreme.. is this really needed?
probeall (and possible probe) to modprobe from
Robert Kulagowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
More weirdness: it tried to install twice, with the second time
failing because it had already installed the first time.
This is a somewhat problematic writing of perl code from me, but anyway this is
fixed now (urpmi-4.4-2mdk, as it is written,
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Tue Jun 17 2003 François Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4.4-2mdk
- fixed parallel handler with removing.
- build transaction set just before starting downloading and
installing packages.
- fixed glitches with gurpmi.
- fixed bad test report.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is a somewhat problematic writing of perl code from me,
but anyway this is
fixed now (urpmi-4.4-2mdk, as it is written,
perl-URPM-0.91-2mdk is out too).
OK, I'll wait until my local mirror has synced and try again.
Thanks.
-BEGIN
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4060
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-17-06 18:48 ---
David, are you sure you want to dupe this bug on 4059? The 4059 issue is about
xconfig not starting at all. This issue is about certain options not being
selectable
Robert Kulagowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a somewhat problematic writing of perl code from me,
but anyway this is
fixed now (urpmi-4.4-2mdk, as it is written,
perl-URPM-0.91-2mdk is out too).
OK, I'll wait until my local mirror has synced and try again.
Thanks.
You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Note the would install {null} instead of... lines.
I think it means the action would be to install, instead of
upgrading.
Just curious, but why is it telling me this in the first place? I've
got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mythtv]$ rpm -qa|grep kernel
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 09:35, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
I still fail to see why people start installing software to see
installed packages.. Typical scenario is to start the given
program for a given task,
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
mandrakeclub (or do a telephone poll for registered users, but that will
be more expensive).
I don't like mandrakeclub much.
why? This is ofcourse a bit oftopic. But club gives you an excellent few
of the (paying) user experience of the distro.
Teemu Torma [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Monday 16 June 2003 20:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you send me the patch and a diff -u comparing your spec file
and the original one?
sure :
[patches cut]
Of course, easier is to just add:
perl -pi -e s/^.*HAVE_INET6=.*$/HAVE_INET6=y/;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please note, this is a development list, if you want a list for
Mandrakesoft business strategy, maybe you can find someone to host
such as list, but this one is not for discussing Mandrakesoft business
strategy, and I am quite sure no posts to this
I don't like mandrakeclub much.
But you like their money, right? Maybe you don't like your mother,
but she gave birth to you, so you at least owe her a nod.
Well, I don't think that Mandrakeclub give birth to Guillaume, so, I
don't realy see the point. If I wanted to start a flame wars,
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gratuitously give money in return for a promise to be recognized with
their votes is exactly the problem that will be the downfall of the
Mandrake distro if it happens.
MandrakeClub users are people who
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scherer wrote:
Now, if you want someting more feature full, I will package synaptics
once apt-get will compile on cooker.
Then, just vote for someone to backport it in 9.1.
$ urpmq -i apt
extracting apt-0.5.5cnc4.1-3mdk.i586
Name:
On 17 Jun 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
about this before. There was also a post about the slow search (to which
didn't quite satisfactory answer IM0, why is kpackage quicker in searching
than rpmdrake? Do you think it can be optimized?)
what kpackage
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:39, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And of course, at present rpmdrake can only be run as root. If it were
Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've
said I would add it, I've added it on May 28, but you didn't
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 19:09, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
Which is a moot point since if you are not going to pay any attention to
users that have *purchased* a vote, what then convinces anyone that you
will put a priority on users that HAVE NOT purchased a vote? Who you are
*not* listening to anyway
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:32, Michael Scherer wrote:
I don't like mandrakeclub much.
But you like their money, right? Maybe you don't like your mother,
but she gave birth to you, so you at least owe her a nod.
Well, I don't think that Mandrakeclub give birth to Guillaume, so, I
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4052
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:32, Michael Scherer wrote:
To make it crystal clear the point is that the money flow from the
Mandrakeclub members is the most potent source of revenue that
Mandrakesoft has, which I don't hesitate to
It was never claimed that the MandrakeClub was an organization that would give its
members democratic control over MandrakeSoft.
Bottom line is no development process, commercial or open-source, is democratic.
They're all tyrannical, because that's the only way anything is ever going to get
On Tuesday June 17 2003 01:09 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
Which is a moot point since if you are not going to pay any
attention to users that have *purchased* a vote, what then
convinces anyone that you will put a priority on users that HAVE
NOT purchased a vote? Who you are *not* listening to
andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 15:39, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And of course, at present rpmdrake can only be run as root. If it were
Untrue! This time you suck.. you asked for that feature, I've
said I would add it,
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:53, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please note, this is a development list, if you want a list for
Mandrakesoft business strategy, maybe you can find someone to host
such as list, but this one is not for discussing Mandrakesoft
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4075
Product: gpm
Component: gpm
Summary: annoying messages in mc and w3m if not root in X
Product: gpm
Version: 1.20.1-5mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4076
Product: pcmcia-cs
Component: packaging
Summary: /etc/pcmcia/atmel.conf is missing
Product: pcmcia-cs
Version: 3.2.3-5mdk
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
Noted. But the topic is not really business strategy from my viewpoint;
it's the impact that the Club has or does not have on development.
I don't think it encompasses all aspects of club effects on development,
merely the
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:14, Tom Brinkman wrote:
Ya know LX, IMO, you're gettin way out'a line. First the prime
motivation for many join'n the Club was to support free (speech)
software, particularly MandrakeSoft. I know it was mine. That'n to
avoid being a freeloader. Many, as myself,
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 21:04, Buchan Milne wrote:
Michael Scherer wrote:
Now, if you want someting more feature full, I will package
synaptics once apt-get will compile on cooker.
Then, just vote for someone to backport it in 9.1.
$ urpmq -i apt
[ apt ]
No idea if it works on rpm-4.2
Can everyone just please stop replying to him? He has an axe to grind
which he's obviously exceedingly happy grinding, and if we keep playing
his game he's never going to shut up. So let's just ignore him and get
back to more productive matters.
--
adamw
François,
* Tue Jun 17 2003 François Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4.4-2mdk
- fixed parallel handler with removing.
- build transaction set just before starting downloading and
installing packages.
- fixed glitches with gurpmi.
- fixed bad test report.
- fixed bad transaction ordering and splitting on
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 22:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Argh. another addition to the GUI..
More like rpmdrake and rpmdrake-remove are just not the right tool for
non-root users to select rpms. I would remove your May 28 addition.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4047
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-06 00:10 ---
For some reason my nautilus version is 2.2.3.1. I will verify the when I can
upgrade Nautilus.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3926
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://nagoya.apache.org/bug
For what it is worth, I liked the interface of rpmdrake from 8.2
better than the 9.0 9.1 stuff. I did complain about 8.2 at that time
that I found the install/remove being on the same button confusing.
But I find the current rpmdrake more confusing, being 4 separate
programs with much related
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3754
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-06 01:15 ---
I guess the apache2-mod_ssl module cannot obsolete/upgrade the apache1 mod_ssl
module. You have to use urpmi apache2-mod_ssl in this particular case.
--
Configure
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3964
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3926
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-18-06 01:28 ---
this report isn't same as mine. as you can see, i reported that ldaps
connections isn't working too. reporters from your pasted bugreport say, that
only tls isn't
Yesterday I was at a client's. I was installing software using the 'drake' gui
tools while they watched. The clients remarked that they were sure glad they
didn't have to install software on linux. They went on to say the they were
use to a much easier install process. They are not stupid. They
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:37 pm, w9ya wrote:
Yesterday I was at a client's. I was installing software using the 'drake'
gui tools while they watched. The clients remarked that they were sure glad
they didn't have to install software on linux. They went on to say the they
were use to a much
Warly originally said end of June. Are we an track?
I am planning on spamming a link to the Cooker HOWTO page in the Cooker TWiki
to the usual ML hangouts coinciding with the release of the snapshot, I just
want to know how much more time there is to work on content.
--
Greg
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:16 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 09:37 pm, w9ya wrote:
Yesterday I was at a client's. I was installing software using the
'drake' gui tools while they watched. The clients remarked that they were
sure glad they didn't have to install software on
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 11:28 pm, w9ya wrote:
Well, I will disagree for two reasons;
1 - The original point I was commenting on was that the 'drake' installer
was getting more complicated by being broke into several sections. This is
a fundamentally flaw concept for newbies to take on. We
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:50 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 11:28 pm, w9ya wrote:
Well, I will disagree for two reasons;
1 - The original point I was commenting on was that the 'drake' installer
was getting more complicated by being broke into several sections. This
is a
3) rmmod still not working -Can't open 'analog': No such file or
directory. I presume this is fixed by Andrey's recent fixes.
As I have never seen it before I cannot be sure. Actually I have not
touched utilities themseves (only packaging).
You have compiled 2.5 with module unloading support,
98 matches
Mail list logo
