On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Any person has the same view of my
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 03:22, Steve Fox wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 22:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
In my estimation, you have completely misrepresented the discussion that was
going on here by substituting your own wishful thinking and by using out of
context comments by people committed to
On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 12:22 am, Steve Fox wrote:
The only thing in doubt is the reference
to 'Mandrake developers', which makes it sound like Mandrakesoft
employees were in this discussion, which they were not.
The article insinuates that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 03:15 am, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Stupid estimation! My name isn't Martin Schulze!!! I was sent a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the url of this thread, if you can read my
name isn't cited in the news.The DWN issue #6
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 12:22 am, Steve Fox wrote:
The only thing in doubt is the reference
to 'Mandrake developers', which makes it sound like Mandrakesoft
employees were in this discussion, which
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:41, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 03:15 am, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Stupid estimation! My name isn't Martin Schulze!!! I was sent a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the url of this thread, if you can
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 10:34, Guy.Bormann wrote:
On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox
this might be just the place to put a plug in for the mandrake-ot mail list,
something created by a mandrake user, to help keep S-N-R to the min.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the e-mail address, and it uses sympa so the
commands should be something most can handle, and if they need any further
help,
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
Just a lurker on this thread (since it's really gone awry), but I would
say definitely not. You've been a very good diplomat for the Debian
project.
--
Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
Just a lurker on this thread (since it's really gone awry), but I would
say definitely not. You've been a very good diplomat for the
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 18:05, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I was sent a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] talking about the topics discussed
here, this thread will be reported in the next issue of Debian Weekly
News(DWN) [1].
[1] = http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/Writing/DWN/dwn-2003-06.html
Brilliant! What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
Just a lurker on this thread
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 22:47, Greg Meyer wrote:
In my estimation, you have completely misrepresented the discussion that was
going on here by substituting your own wishful thinking and by using out of
context comments by people committed to making Mandrake successful. That is
not being a
On Saturday 08 February 2003 12:34 pm, John Goerzen wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In one months or two you're doing: apt-get update; apt-get -uy
upgrade.I can see :P
We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
cron), and it gives me more than
On Saturday 08 February 2003 18:34, John Goerzen wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In one months or two you're doing: apt-get update; apt-get -uy
upgrade.I can see :P
We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
cron), and it gives me more than
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 17:34, John Goerzen wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In one months or two you're doing: apt-get update; apt-get -uy
upgrade.I can see :P
We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
cron), and it gives me more than Debain
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 16:12, Steffen Barszus wrote:
On Saturday 08 February 2003 18:34, John Goerzen wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In one months or two you're doing: apt-get update; apt-get -uy
upgrade.I can see :P
We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The latest Debian release, called Woody doesn't supports XFS officially,
but you can use a solution[1] made by a developer.The reason is very
simple: Stability first, features[2] after.
If your choice is: Features first.Debian can solve your problems
John Goerzen wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In one months or two you're doing: apt-get update; apt-get -uy
upgrade.I can see :P
We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
cron), and it gives me more than Debain does, unless Debian has XFS+ACL
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 18:53, Buchan Milne wrote:
John Goerzen wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In one months or two you're doing: apt-get update; apt-get -uy
upgrade.I can see :P
We have 'urpmi.update -a; urpmi --auto-select --auto' (I have this in
cron), and it gives
You know, the best thing about Linux is that nobody forces you to use
anything that you don't want to. In other words, not one person is
forcing anybody to use or to contribute to Mandrake. If you feel that
you are not getting what you need from Mandrake, then for heaven's sake
please go find
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
useless and out of context...
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:28, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
You know, the best thing about Linux is that nobody forces you to use
anything that you don't want to. In other words, not one person is
forcing anybody to use or to contribute to Mandrake. If you feel that
you are not getting what you
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:28, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
useless and out of context...
Definitely, i agree.But some people are
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 22:28, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
useless and out of context...
Well, I think, for the good of all
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 19:51, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le Samedi 8 Février 2003 22:28, Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's the discussion here? It isn't useful for us!
please guys don't start a Debian vs Mdk-LNX threads it's completely
useless and
Any person has the same view of my messages as Lonnie?
ET, stands up waving both arms above head like a mad man who has been stuck on
a desert island for years, upon seeing his rescue ship.
Lonnie spoke for me too..
Le Vendredi 7 Février 2003 19:51, John Goerzen a écrit :
I would like to try to offer a bit of insight
on what Debian has done right, what Debian has done wrong, and perhaps
explore some areas Debian can work together with the Mandrake
community in the future.
You 're welcome.
I also like
29 matches
Mail list logo
