could think of providing CVS on marketplace.
What do you think about it?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
__
e EPP side only. The Eclipse
SDK could stay as the Platform developers wants it to be, since it's not
really a packge for end-users.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<ht
's
distributed doesn't have an impact on the ability to validate the Team
framework using CVS plugins at build-time.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Twee
On 06/26/2014 04:31 PM, Ed Willink wrote:
Except that of course we should replace CVS by GIT in at least the
EPPs and so add on a lot more MB.
Egit has already been embedded in most Eclipse Packages since Juno.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/to
from where we explicitly exclude the OTDT patch. And
since we consume this repository, we are sure we always get the JDT one.
https://github.com/jbosstools/jbosstools-download.jboss.org/blob/master/jbosstools/updates/requirements/luna/build.xml#L32
HTH
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss
.egit".
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-pr
the epp-dev list.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailin
roject? Still no way to
contribute to simultaneous release with Gerrit? :P
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
and EPP package and making sure we work well with
other projects of this same Mars site.
Can the Release Train (or in that case the aggregator only) process
handle the possibility of an unexpected release after M4 ?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat &l
EPP. But
since you ask, let's do it now ;)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=440809
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<htt
lieve such a picture would fit most actions related to deployment
better than the usual yellow disk/database icon we see everywhere.
If there is no such icon yet, then it would be could if someone could
contribute one (and attach it to bug 441253)
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at
with a
nice error in a pop-up or in console saying "Sorry, you need at least
GTK 2.18 to use SWT and Eclipse", then people know the reason of the
error and can react accordingly.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <htt
Hi,
I've recently contributed an entry for THyM in the aggregator.
Where can I find the output repository of continuous build in order to
test this stuff?
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria
lly
the latest snapshot from CI... That seems strange to me as I would
expect the build candidate/staging site to be immutable until build is
released, whereas I would expect the snapshot site to change
independently of the staging repository status.
Aren't we missing a step here?
--
Mickael Istr
as staging.
I'm more used to a Maven-like snapshot->staging->release model with
different URLs and manually controlled promotion between each step, and
which doesn't require to shutdown CI builds; that's why I got confused.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, b
dvanced on this topic (at least it has FTP/SFTP
support), I don't see the benefit on re-implementing the same thing in
other project, instead of just using what's already there.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http:
r patch is approved,
you get a message on the bugzilla asking you to update the N&N
(providing a Gerrit contribution), and when it's good, it gets merged.
Same tools and same process as usual, nothing new to learn, distributed
work... What else?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at J
ns? To be
honest, I think a N&N for the entire release train that isn’t managed
by a single person will be a disaster.
Ian (Bull)'s top 10 features for a release train are IMO a good global
N&N and give good visibility to the coolest new IDE features.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse develope
On 02/04/2015 04:04 PM, LORENZO Vincent wrote:
Hi everybody,
Hi,
It seems than build.eclipse.org is down, no?
I get this message :
ssh: connect to host build.eclipse.org port 22: Connection timed out
"ssh build.eclipse.org" works fine for me.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse de
t-defs/*.target admin/* .gitignore
$ git commit -m "Merge TM and TCF"
$ git push origin HEAD:master
HTH
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Twee
On 04/23/2015 09:37 PM, David M Williams wrote:
A) I do not know that anyone has connected this to Gerrit in anyway
Not yet, but hopefully soon:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=465281
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
M
r Simrel:
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Simrel/Contributing_to_Simrel_Aggregation_Build#Contribute_via_a_Gerrit_review
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://tw
://wiki.eclipse.org/Gerrit#Git_over_HTTPS
...
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-
one you see in
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/admin/projects/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build
when selecting HTTP ? Gerrit had an issue with some users in the past,
creating different Gerrit users for the same account.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss
clipse.org/EGit/User_Guide/Remote
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-i
get_branch
to make clear that this workflow doesn't trigger a Gerrit review.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
the
validation job starts ASAP.
https://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=Simrel/Contributing_to_Simrel_Aggregation_Build#Contribute_via_a_Gerrit_review
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com>
ld be best for most (committers, releng,
adopter projects, users) to have it as a regular update than a patch
feature.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitt
ter, you can apply your own patch via Gerrit UI, or
push without using a Gerrit review (and automated tests).
https://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php?title=Simrel/Contributing_to_Simrel_Aggregation_Build#Pushing_your_changes
HTH
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red
> I rather want the old style before Gerrit back (but then maybe I am alone in
> this) and then we use Gerrit for contributions which need to be reviewed.
This is not old-style, it's exactly the current behaviour for most Eclipse
projects using Gerrit, including Simrel. Just the URL of push has
If you have a SSH account to build.eclipse.org, use "ssh -x", and start
Eclipse from build.eclipse.org, you may be able to debug HIPP, or to use
vncviewer to watch tests running.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools&g
s not possible to
mix Jetty-websockets 9.2.10 with Jetty 9.2.13. And it's not the first
time we face such issue in JBoss Tools.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://
On 09/16/2015 04:46 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
More precisely: Jetty won't complain, but there will be ClassNotFound
at runtime.
s/Jetty/p2/
More precisely: p2 won't complain, but there will be ClassNotFound at
runtime.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red
On 09/16/2015 04:45 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 09/16/2015 04:39 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
Can your code not depend on an older version of jetty. Or is only one
version of jetty allowed in a given bundle stack?
Because of API inconsistencies, lack of conformance with semantic
versioning and
, thanks!
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-
/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=461919#c2
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-issues
per se, but one service providing the "osgi.service.registrar"
capability (that only Aries Spi-Fly is providing so far).
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://
ll most likely get advertised as part of Mars.1. So
we can expect that the bug will have a high exposure and will hurt many
users, giving an impression of "the only new thing in this release
causes a blocker bug". This is not something the Eclipse Community and
Eclipse IDE can afford
By the way, thanks to your user for finding this issue; and thank you
for fixing it promptly and letting us know.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.co
e
reasons mentioned in previous mail). Isn't it something the Architecture
Concil should decide?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<ht
On 09/23/2015 08:43 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 09/23/2015 08:35 AM, Etienne Studer wrote:
Dave Williams gave directions on how to proceed with this problem:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=478054
In short, there will be no respin of Mars 1.
I've read David's comments
ns are
doing a great job, shipping applications that seem mostly bug-free. If
we want Eclipse IDE to stay relevant we cannot ship applications with a
critical bug.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com
Hey,
Actually, the RC4 candidate contains BuildShip *1.0.2* which doesn't
seem to be affected with this blocker bug.
So if there is no blocker bug with BuildShip 1.0.2, I believe there is
no need to change anything on the SimRel/EPP side.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, b
the version shows
1.0.2.something was a mistake on our side to bump of the version in
time for the 1.0.3 release.
Ok, so we'll need steps to reproduce then. Since taking an EPP Java
Package (with BuildShip installed) and starting it prompts for workspace.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer
happening whenever BuildShip is installed. In
case it's happens with a low probability, then maybe it's not as
critical as I thought.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweet
this issue of missing workspace pop-up in JBoss
Tools, and in case one doesn't switch between workspaces, it's actually
easily un-noticed or noticed long after the issue is introduced.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools&g
I opened https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=478151 to track
the arguments, discussion, decision and actions.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<htt
Maybe it should simply be called "Aggregated release" and that's all.
Many projects create releases between aggregated ones, in order to
satisfy their users and "pick" one of those releases to get into the
aggregator. It's IMO a simpler and more efficient model.
--
Mick
/dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
Mars.1 !
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-
SWTBot will participate in Neon Simultaneous Release, probably with a
2.4.1 or a 2.5.0 version (time will tell) and targets to remain included
in the Eclipse RCP/RAP package.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog
a fix
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=477670 would be a more
important progress for toolbar than brainstorming about what to keep
in/move out.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wo
this record to 2.4.1 or 2.5.0 and create a new one for
the 2.4.0 then.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
to be able to point them to
a nightly build of Mars.2 and EPP packages, containing the latest build
of Eclipse 4.5.2. Then users could add this site to their available
software sites, and try a "Check for updates"/
Is such a site available? Would it be possible to create it?
Cheers,
--
ept of a true "nightly". It is simply rebuilt whenever
anyone makes a new contribution.
As always, caution is urged and these builds would not be for anyone
using them "for production". But, otherwise, it's great to get the
early testing.
Hope this helps,
[1] htt
ty for advanced
users who actually tweak that kind of thing to enable/disable it?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
nd permission to
merge via Gerrit if everything seems good. This workflow prevents from
breaking "production" branches.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http:
ibution is breaking the build.
What do you think?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-pro
to get a history of the SimRel builds
and to associate it with the actual commits that were involved. The CI
jobs on http://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel do not show easy to consume
data. Is there somewhere else I can look at to first get a list of
recent-ish failure of si
z] way.
The SimRel rules are very good, but here is an example of how they get
ignored. My idea with Gerrit is that by enforcing Gerrit reviews, we'll
make it easier to enforce such rules.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <
lidating (manually or automatically) the part of the
rule about a site containing statically only one version highlights the
fact that it might be preferable to always have fully-qualified
versions. I'll skip this part from my "scope of experiments" for the moment.
--
Mickael I
at what's on HEAD after the merge. As we expect the changes
to be "atomic" and relatively isolated at the time, and since we still
have a CI build to validate the actual HEAD, it seems to be a good
trade-off.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jb
On 01/08/2016 10:54 AM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Mickael Istria <mailto:mist...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 01/07/2016 07:40 PM, David M Williams wrote:
Yep. You have stated your desire to "test for that" ... so have
at it.
I'l
On 01/07/2016 07:40 PM, David M Williams wrote:
cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org wrote on 01/07/2016
12:30:21 PM:
> From: Mickael Istria
> To: cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org,
> Date: 01/07/2016 12:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Enforce Gerri
ms to me that the extra-cost of changing the version when
also changing the URL is not that high, is it?
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.co
traints on project's repositories layout.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-
So if the b3 model editor were providing that, would it suit you? Would
you specify fully-qualified versions to the aggregator? If it's the only
thing blocking you and others in using fully-qualified versions, I may
be able to raise the priority of this improvement in my todo-list.
--
Micka
e perceived as a redundant effort
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=485472
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets'
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_
Hi all,
A topic that would be nice to agree on tomorrow meeting, if we get
enough time, is the number of keynotes.
Do you prefer having 2 keynotes, or only 1. Please vote.
My vote goes to only one.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/to
Sorry, wrong mailing-list...
However, the conference in question is EclipseCon France. So since the
question is in the air, feel free to give your opinion if you have one.
(prefer sending emails to me directly over spamming this cross-project
list).
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at
On 01/08/2016 10:44 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
On 01/08/2016 07:13 PM, Eike Stepper wrote:
Am 08.01.2016 um 17:29 schrieb Marc Khouzam:
I also would not like to have to change versions.
Changing the URL only allows me to change one line quickly.
Changing each version of each feature group is
On 01/13/2016 11:04 PM, Matthias Sohn wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Mickael Istria <mailto:mist...@redhat.com>> wrote:
What do you think about https://vid.me/K3GV ? Would you set
fully-qualified versions with those 2 features?
this is awesome, when can I get thi
I'm using the same version on a Neon M4 without issue.
In your message it's not clear whether you're trying to open a b3aggrcon
file or the simrel.b3aggr file? As far as I can see, the editor can only
open the b3aggr file.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, b
o were simply automating
code-style as commit hook have stopped doing that because it was causing
more pain than fixing issue; imagine if the change is not only style but
an actual "payload" change (like it's suggested here)...
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by
On 01/14/2016 08:20 AM, Eike Stepper wrote:
Am 14.01.2016 um 07:54 schrieb Mickael Istria:
I'm using the same version on a Neon M4 without issue.
In your message it's not clear whether you're trying to open a
b3aggrcon file or the simrel.b3aggr file? As far as I can see, the
On 01/14/2016 08:27 AM, Eike Stepper wrote:
Am 14.01.2016 um 08:11 schrieb Mickael Istria:
Have you considered contributing to the B3 editor? Your experience
about Modeling would be highly welcome there.
Yes, I did. But then I concluded that it's probably a week of effort.
Mostly becau
On 01/08/2016 05:09 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:
Would a contribution that adds/sets the fully qualified version to all
current b3aggrcon files missing it be welcome? Projects contributing
volatile content fail the build next time they update their
contributed repo, so we'll know which pro
This is documented on
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Simrel/Contributing_to_Simrel_Aggregation_Build
, that seems up-to-date.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<htt
ect. On the next page you'll probably want to
select the ssh version of the repository URI and then your good to go...
Nice!
Maybe you can mention it on the wiki page?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mick
and I believe they may require a respin.
I assume if I want to test the JEE package, I should get the EPP build
from the link at [#1], correct ?
Yes.
And you can report your feedback on those to the epp-dev ML and/or on
Bugzilla ;)
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
9.0, which is one version
higher than what Neon M7 contains.
Thanks in advance,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://
Thank you Jeremie,
On 05/12/2016 10:31 PM, Jeremie Bresson wrote:
The discussion should probably continue on the Mylyn Docs Mailing List:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/mylyn-docs-dev/
I opened a bug for that:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=493599
--
Mickael Istria
/eclipse/news/4.6/M7/#Import-projects , which
aims at really simplifying the import story so that users don't have to
care much about what they're importing.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.
newsletter (to be published soon AFAIK), I guess those can be
reused as marketing content to promote the Neon release.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://
On 05/19/2016 11:06 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Is this captured in a project new and noteworthy document somewhere?
Not that I am aware of. The articles on the newsletter are the best
resource at the moment.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/to
ys be successful, it's also (and maybe mainly) to catch issues or
bad smells whenever they happen.
Let's consider such failed builds as a way to keep and raise
maintainability and quality of SimRel.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/to
in
individual projects.
Basically, I don't understand how this story and the initial Simrel
issue are related.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
&
a bit more than 1 hour I believe. And
it also affects Marketplace.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
_
that were tried and have some
feedback on this topic?
Does anyone know existing software doing that?
Would it be interesting for our community? Would it make it more
productive, more fun, more diverse, whatever...? Would it have
noticeable drawbacks on the community?
--
Mickael Istria
Eclips
d into anything of value out of the Eclipse Foundation
rewards. Not sure it makes it better legally speaking, but I've seen
system with points and rewards in multiple other organizations.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.o
er +1 point for every
comment.
We could also allow the bug assignee who receive the reward to
distribute the bounty as he wants, for example to reward a critical
comment. Or even let people reward comments (similarly to giving stars,
hearts, thumbs up...) even if there's no patch yet.
Hi all,
I've got a question about marketplace.eclipse.org.
When one adds an entry on behalf of an Eclipse.org project to
marketplace, should they set "Member Company" to true or false? What are
the advantage of being marked as a project from a Member Company?
Cheers,
--
y yet?
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-
it is a decent documentation if commit messages are
well written. With the rise of code-review, there are less "noisy"
commits, so reading the changelog just seems like a better documentation
than sorting out the right Bugzilla request.
HTH,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclips
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=EMFT.b3&component=editor
for the editor.
For the wiki, I believe you can directly fix the documentation.
HTH
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.
GSon 2.5.0.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
c
ms more pragmatic to put this hope in Orbit them.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria>
___
cross
ntegration builds for it.
EPP packages are built on any SimRel change, so what you're asking for
here is supposed to be available at
https://hudson.eclipse.org/packaging/job/oxygen.epp-tycho-build/ (when
there is a good build available).
Maybe the Platform doc can be updated to recomm
ould be to *not* reference EPP package
at all, but to reference the Platform SDK I-Build directly, in doc and
Oomph config.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com&
bset of the "for
RCP/RAP", merging them would just mean removing the "for Committers".
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat <http://www.jboss.org/tools>
My blog <http://mickaelistria.wordpress.com> - My Tweets
<http://twitter.com/mickaelistria&
1 - 100 of 477 matches
Mail list logo
