Bug#1016954: cdimage.debian.org: Installing from live system sets up LUKS1 partitions instead of LUKS2

Hi Markus! On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 02:20:08PM +, Legner, Markus wrote: >Package: cdimage.debian.org >Severity: normal >X-Debbugs-Cc: markus.leg...@siemens.com > >I've found some inconsistent installation behavior between the "normal" >installer and the installer from the live system on the

Bug#1016954: cdimage.debian.org: Installing from live system sets up LUKS1 partitions instead of LUKS2

Package: cdimage.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: markus.leg...@siemens.com Dear Maintainer, I've found some inconsistent installation behavior between the "normal" installer and the installer from the live system on the live image [1]: When choosing to encrypt the system, the

Re: Time to drop win32-loader ?

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:46:09PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >Hello there, >(please CC me on replies, I'm not on these lists) > >(live from the d-i/debian-cd BoF) > >as some of you likely remember, win32-loader is shipped on d-i and debian-cd >images, and is added in autorun.inf for

Re: [debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

Hey Raphael! On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:55:21PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >Hello, > >On mar., 09 août 2022, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Ah, sure, that seems quite likely. I did not have the issue in my >> tests, but I tested with a partial mirror as created by simple-cdd so I >> quite likely

Re: [debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

Hello, On mar., 09 août 2022, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Ah, sure, that seems quite likely. I did not have the issue in my > tests, but I tested with a partial mirror as created by simple-cdd so I > quite likely did not hit the problematic recursive dependency. > > Can you point me to the

Re: [debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

Hey Raphael On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 09:00:59AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >On lun., 08 août 2022, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> This weekly DVD run just tooke ~15h to run compared to the normal ~30m >> or so. Checking the stuff in the log here, I'm thinking that this >> "Deep recursion on

Re: [debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

Hi Steve, On lun., 08 août 2022, Steve McIntyre wrote: > This weekly DVD run just tooke ~15h to run compared to the normal ~30m > or so. Checking the stuff in the log here, I'm thinking that this > "Deep recursion on subroutine" message is very likely due to your > changes in commit

Re: [debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 07:56:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Hey Raphaël! > >This weekly DVD run just tooke ~15h to run compared to the normal ~30m >or so. Checking the stuff in the log here, I'm thinking that this >"Deep recursion on subroutine" message is very likely due to your >changes in

Re: [debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

Seems updated images are there now, thanks Sledge :) On 8/8/22, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 07:56:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>Hey Raphaėl! >> >>This weekly DVD run just tooke ~15h to run compared to the normal ~30m >>or so. Checking the stuff in the log here, I'm

Re: [debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 07:56:49PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Hey Raphaël! > >This weekly DVD run just tooke ~15h to run compared to the normal ~30m >or so. Checking the stuff in the log here, I'm thinking that this >"Deep recursion on subroutine" message is very likely due to your >changes in

[debian...@casulana.debian.org: testingcds 3sidamd64 (amd64 dvd) has failed; log included]

Hey Raphaël! This weekly DVD run just tooke ~15h to run compared to the normal ~30m or so. Checking the stuff in the log here, I'm thinking that this "Deep recursion on subroutine" message is very likely due to your changes in commit cc4e1fa450a074ef1428bf678a57cdf8b0d0f0e5. Could you take a look

Re: buster EOL (10.13) and 11.5 planning

On 07/08/2022 19:06, Ansgar wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - August 20 - [August 27 doesn't work for at least me and the Images Team, so nope] - September 3rd - September 10th All dates should still work for me. any opinions on whether we should do

Re: buster EOL (10.13) and 11.5 planning

Hi, On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > - August 20 > - [August 27 doesn't work for at least me and the Images Team, so nope] > - September 3rd > - September 10th All dates should still work for me. > any opinions on whether we should do them at the same time or >

Bug#601203: Released fix in git

Control: tags -1 + pending Hello, I fixed this issue in git now: https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/debian-cd/-/commit/8513b237afbdb59a4a59d1bc707d37f0aa9138f7 This was on top of a first cleanup where I turned $add_rec and $add_sug into global variables:

Processed: Released fix in git

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #601203 [debian-cd] debian-cd: Recommended packages should be included recursively for apt to find Added tag(s) pending. -- 601203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Re: Time to drop win32-loader ?

Salut OdyX, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2022-07-19): > That brings two sides of the question: > * should it still be shipped on amd64 netinsts, CD's, other images? > * should it still be offered on the mirrors ? > on https://deb.debian.org/debian/tools/win32-loader/stable/ > (where it lands via

Re: Time to drop win32-loader ?

Hello, On Tue, 19 Jul 2022, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I haven't checked (as I don't have access to Windows machines...), but I'm > quite confident that the Windows Bootloader fiddling is quite unlikely to > work > on modern (Secure Boot ?) machines. I think I had read some report that it

Re: Bug#1013079: installation-reports: GUI install option isn't visible on boot

Control: reassign -1 debian-cd Hi, * Holger Wansing : > > > - On Jun 17, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote: > > > > > > > > https://openqa.debian.net/tests/60553#step/_boot_to_debianinstaller/2 > > > > > > > > if you look closely in the highlighted box, you can just

Bug#1013079: installation-reports: GUI install option isn't visible on boot

Holger Wansing writes: > Hi, > >> > - On Jun 17, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote: >> > > >> > > https://openqa.debian.net/tests/60553#step/_boot_to_debianinstaller/2 >> > > >> > > if you look closely in the highlighted box, you can just about see >> > > "Graphical

Processed: Re: Bug#1013079: installation-reports: GUI install option isn't visible on boot

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 debian-cd Bug #1013079 [grub2] [UEFI] debian-installer: bad choice for background color of highlighted menu entry Bug reassigned from package 'grub2' to 'debian-cd'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1013079 to the same values previously

Re: buster EOL (10.13) and 11.5 planning

Hey Adam! On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:09:52PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > >Use of buster-security will pass from the Security Team to LTS in a few >days time, so we should get the EOL point release organised. We need at >least a couple of weeks to get things sorted, so as some suggestions: > >-

Re: buster EOL (10.13) and 11.5 planning

Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2022-07-28): > Use of buster-security will pass from the Security Team to LTS in a few > days time, so we should get the EOL point release organised. We need at > least a couple of weeks to get things sorted, so as some suggestions: > > - August 20 > - [August 27 doesn't

Re: buster EOL (10.13) and 11.5 planning

All dates works for me On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:11 PM Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > Use of buster-security will pass from the Security Team to LTS in a few > days time, so we should get the EOL point release organised. We need at > least a couple of weeks to get things sorted, so as some

buster EOL (10.13) and 11.5 planning

Hi, Use of buster-security will pass from the Security Team to LTS in a few days time, so we should get the EOL point release organised. We need at least a couple of weeks to get things sorted, so as some suggestions: - August 20 - [August 27 doesn't work for at least me and the Images Team, so

Re: Live System images and Pure Blends

El 24/7/22 a las 13:02, Stefan Kropp escribió: # Rescue Disk Image An image for a live system to rescues a broken system. It may have a set of useful tool, but may not have a X-Server. Powerful editor, maybe also gnu compilers and manpages and screen / tmux. This is not just a 'small' Rescue

Re: Live System images and Pure Blends

Hello Stefan, On 24/07/2022 13:02, Stefan Kropp wrote: I have been started to look into live system generation (live-build), Be honest, I have never been used a Debian Live CD. Few days/weeks back I looked into the live CD which are provided by Debian (live-wrapper). Your timing is rather

Live System images and Pure Blends

Hello Debian Project and CD-Team, I have been started to look into live system generation (live-build), Be honest, I have never been used a Debian Live CD. Few days/weeks back I looked into the live CD which are provided by Debian (live-wrapper). I also think, it is very important to provide

Re: Time to drop win32-loader ?

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:46:09PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hello there, > (please CC me on replies, I'm not on these lists) > > (live from the d-i/debian-cd BoF) > > as some of you likely remember, win32-loader is shipped on d-i and debian-cd > images, and is added in autorun.inf

Time to drop win32-loader ?

Hello there, (please CC me on replies, I'm not on these lists) (live from the d-i/debian-cd BoF) as some of you likely remember, win32-loader is shipped on d-i and debian-cd images, and is added in autorun.inf for automated launch on Windows machines, when USB/CDs are plugged in. What it does

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i added to merge_debian_isos the capability to burn the resulting ISO 9660 filesystem directly to optical media and to write it directly to storage device files. This removes the need for having substantial free disk space beyond the capacity to store the original ISO images. While burning

New Ukrainian Debian-CD mirror

Admin Name: Ivan Barabash Admin Email: s...@ukr.net RSYNC URL: rsync://fastmirror.pp.ua/debian-cd/ RSYNC allowed only for scans: YES HTTP URL: http(s)://fastmirror.pp.ua/ debian-cd Bandwidth: 1Gbps IPs: 93.126.105.202

Re: New unofficial Debian 11.4 release torrent files not registered in the bittorent tracker

Hi Steve, I can confirm it is now working. Thank you for the prompt action and glad to be of help at least with the reporting. Seeding the torrents now... :) On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 2:25 PM Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Hi Blaž! > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 01:24:30PM +0200, Blaž Zakrajšek wrote: >

Re: New unofficial Debian 11.4 release torrent files not registered in the bittorent tracker

Hi Blaž! On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 01:24:30PM +0200, Blaž Zakrajšek wrote: > >I am not sure if this is the correct address to report, but I would >just like to report that (at least some) new unofficial Debian 11.4 >torrent files are not registered with the bittorent tracker[1][2], >however the

New unofficial Debian 11.4 release torrent files not registered in the bittorent tracker

Hello CD-team, I am not sure if this is the correct address to report, but I would just like to report that (at least some) new unofficial Debian 11.4 torrent files are not registered with the bittorent tracker[1][2], however the official ones are[3]. Thank you for all your hard work and kind

Adding CD Mirrors

Hello, I'm already registered as a Debian mirror (http://mirror.johnnybegood.fr/debian) and I added the CD, CD Daily and CD Weekly mirrors, could you add them to the list?Here are the URLs: Debian CD: https://mirror.johnnybegood.fr/debian-cd/ Debian CD Daily:

Great day,

Great day, We are as yet holding on to hear from you about your lost amount. Answer for more info. Regard Director, National Security Agency

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Zhang Boyang wrote: > All OK! Thank you again :) So as far as we two are concerned, it seems we have a candidate for release. Currently it only goes into the GNU xorriso tarball, which is not src of any Debian package. I could put it into the libisoburn tarball. But as it is specific to

Bug#1013432: debian-cd: UEFI boot uses black text on dark blue background

Hi Roland! On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 04:11:07PM +0200, Roland Clobus wrote: >Package: debian-cd >Version: 3.1.35 >Severity: normal > >Hello, > >since grub version 2.06-3 entered sid, the UEFI menu of the daily netinst image >shows a black text on the dark blue background for the selected boot item.

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, On 2022/6/26 17:03, Thomas Schmitt wrote: New version: https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libburnia/libisoburn/commit/0e8227e76ae4c4f24097cfac2f415ef8e25ae4e7 Tested with: 1) Merge 17 DVDs, on Debian and Alpine Linux environment. 2) Merge 2 DLBDs, on Debian and Alpine Linux environment. 3)

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Zhang Boyang wrote: > Theoretically if both file is already sorted, we can use the `-m' option I like this idea. Just in case Debian grows to a million packages. But i understand that i would need two separate files for sorting. grep ' ./pool/' file1 fgrep -v ' ./pool/' file2 sort -k

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, On 2022/6/26 03:30, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Complexity-wise this replaces a slow O(n) algorithm by a faster O(n) and an additional O(n * log(n)) run. At some size of Debian the slow speed of the linear loop will be compensated by the sorting complexity. But there is still room: A sort of

Re: New Ukrainian Mirror

Cyril Brulebois (2022-06-25): > Thanks for reaching out to us, but according to [1], you should be using > a form [2] instead. > > 1. https://www.debian.org/mirror/ftpmirror#submit > 2. https://www.debian.org/mirror/submit Sorry, I failed to notice you were requesting the addition of a

Re: New Ukrainian Mirror

Hi Ivan, s...@ukr.net (2022-06-07): > Please add a new Debian CD mirror. > > Name: FastMirror > Site: https://fastmirror.pp.ua/ > Repo link: (http|https|rsync)://fastmirror.pp.ua/debian > and > (http|https|rsync)://fastmirror.pp.ua/debian-cd >

Re: bullseye CD/DVD for arm64

Hi, Wilhelm MOSER (2022-06-18): > Ja, das ist mir schon klar nur wenn debina das release macht dann muss doch > zumindest das notwendigste funktionieren. > Wenn in der LXDe dann bei XY die Maus nicht geht ist das eben ein bug wenn > ich das ding sber nich mal installieren kann dann setzt es

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Zhang Boyang wrote: > These experiments all succeeded. Thank you very much! Good Job! :) Thank you for testing and challenging. I wrote: > > For now i decided to take the 50 seconds with dash. > if you really want to reduce runtime I would suggest using > `sort -s -u -k 2

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Some good news, I tested: 1) Build my unofficial DVD set (17 DVDs), and merge them using the merge script on my Debian machine. 2) Build my unofficial DLBD set (2 DLBDs), and merge them using the merge script on my Debian machine. 3) Merge 2 DLBDs using the merge script under a Alpine

ASDA- Monthly Purchase Order

Dear debian-cd We are interested in having some of your hot selling product in our stores and outlets spread all over United Kingdom, Northern Island and Africa. ASDA Stores Limited is one of the highest- ranking Wholesale & Retail outlets in the United Kingdom. We shall furnish our detailed

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i explored two ways to get a correct and complete md5sum.txt after merging and sorting: - Generating the whole md5sum.txt from the emerging ISO's file tree is possible by help of xorriso, although there is no file tree yet where all regular files of the ISO can be found for checksumming.

Bug#1013432: debian-cd: UEFI boot uses black text on dark blue background

Package: debian-cd Version: 3.1.35 Severity: normal Hello, since grub version 2.06-3 entered sid, the UEFI menu of the daily netinst image shows a black text on the dark blue background for the selected boot item. https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/sid_d-i/arch-latest/amd64/iso-

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i wrote: > > > md5sum.txt Zhang Boyang wrote: > I think maybe we should just create the md5sum from scratch? Well, not from scratch, because the paths would come from the merged md5sum.txt. But indeed the merged file needs polishing: - Some files are listed multiple times because they

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi On 2022/6/21 04:17, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, Thanks for the detailed explanation! I think we can ignore minor differences, since creating a bit-for-bit reproducible image seems too hard for us. md5sum.txt Ouch. My script sorts the merged lines by the MD5 fields rather than by the

Upcoming stable point release (11.4)

Hi, The next point release for "bullseye" (11.4) is scheduled for Saturday, July 9th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: 11.4 planning

Hi Everyone! Following on Laura, we can do both dates though the 9th would be preferable as the July 2nd weekend falls on a Holiday week which is not ideal for my timezone. We can cover regardless, but the 9th is ideal . On 6/20/22 10:09, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: Hi I'm not sure about

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Zhang Boyang wrote: > 2) Create my own version of my-DLBD1.iso and my-DLBD2.iso from my private > mirror. This explains why a firmware package was missing which is in the official DLBD-1 but obviously on your my-DLBD2. With the new script version which merges /firmware trees: > This time

Re: 11.4 planning

Hi I'm not sure about Donald's preferences but I could do both dates, so count with press/webmaster in any case. Kind regards El 17 de junio de 2022 21:31:23 CEST, "Adam D. Barratt" escribió: >Hi, > >We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for >bullseye sorted, and I

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, On 2022/6/19 17:23, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, i tested merging of /firmware directories with barely sufficently complete debian-11.0.0-amd64-DLBD-[12].iso.tmp from aborted jigdo-lite runs. All files which are reported as being only in CUSTOM(all-in-one) by

Re: 11.4 planning

Hi Steve, On Sun, 2022-06-19 at 18:04 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey Adam! > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > > We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for > > bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the > > Deb{Camp,Conf} >

Re: 11.4 planning

Hi, On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 20:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > - July 2nd (means freezing next weekend, but so be it) > - July 9th Both would work for me. Ansgar

Re: 11.4 planning

Hey Adam! On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > >We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for >bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf} >period. I think the possible dates that make sense are: > >- July 2nd (means

Re: 11.4 planning

Adam D. Barratt (2022-06-17): > - July 2nd (means freezing next weekend, but so be it) > - July 9th Both would be fine d-i wise. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc

Re: 11.4 planning

On Fri, 17, Jun, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt spoke thus.. > Hi, > > We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for > bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf} > period. I think the possible dates that make sense are: > > - July 2nd

Re: 11.4 planning

On 17 June 2022 21:04:02 BST, "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote: >On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for >> bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf} >> period. I think

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i tested merging of /firmware directories with barely sufficently complete debian-11.0.0-amd64-DLBD-[12].iso.tmp from aborted jigdo-lite runs. All files which are reported as being only in CUSTOM(all-in-one) by https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011343#115 are listed by

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Zhang Boyang wrote: > I will definitely try it Meanwhile i got some insight into the riddle about diffs between merged.iso and CUSTOM-1.iso like Only in /groundtruth/firmware: arm-trusted-firmware-tools_2.4+dfsg-2_amd64.deb Only in /groundtruth/firmware:

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hello, Thanks for making this program! I will definitely try it as soon as I finished my current work! Thank you again :) Best Regards, Zhang Boyang On 2022/6/15 19:17, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, although it was not the final solution of this bug report, i beefed up my merger script for

Re: bullseye CD/DVD for arm64

Ja, das ist mir schon klar nur wenn debina das release macht dann muss doch zumindest das notwendigste funktionieren. Wenn in der LXDe dann bei XY die Maus nicht geht ist das eben ein bug wenn ich das ding sber nich mal installieren kann dann setzt es aus. Und ich hab null bock das Ding am

Re: bullseye CD/DVD for arm64

Das generelle Problem dürfte U-Boot sein #76 beschäftigt sich mit diesem Problem. Offensichtlich muß man sich den Loader selbst zusammenbasteln...? https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9744=110033#pid110033 Am 17.06.2022 16:52, schrieb Wilhelm MOSER: Hi, tried to do an install

Re: 11.4 planning

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for > bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf} > period. I think the possible dates that make sense are: > > - July 2nd (means

11.4 planning

Hi, We're (again) running behind in getting the next point release for bullseye sorted, and I know we're about to run into the Deb{Camp,Conf} period. I think the possible dates that make sense are: - July 2nd (means freezing next weekend, but so be it) - July 9th I think there's already a

bullseye CD/DVD for arm64

Hi, tried to do an install from usb like I did on amd64 (without any problems and WiFi support) and run  into several troubles: 1. it took 5 minutes to reckon that the LAN is not present why? 2. Wireless keyboard not detected - USB-Cord is OK. 3. grub installer - install and graphical -

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i followed David's advise to consider the warnings of shellcheck, to drop the demand for bash, and to check early whether all needed programs are available. xorriso gets now checked for being young enough for the job of replaying the boot related commands as detected with input ISO 1. (1.3.2

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 06:33, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > i wrote: > > > https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libburnia/libisoburn/raw/branch/master/test/merge_debian_isos > Nevertheless, it should be tested independently of me whether it can be > tricked into destroying existing data on disk or leaving

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i wrote: > > https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libburnia/libisoburn/raw/branch/master/test/merge_debian_isos Steve McIntyre wrote: > That might be a useful thing to include in a package. What do you think? Best would be if debian-cd would take it, so that it can be adapted when the repository format

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hey Thomas! On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 01:17:31PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >Hi, > >although it was not the final solution of this bug report, i beefed up >my merger script for Debian ISOs so that it can combine an arbitrary >number of ISOs (within the limits of /dev/loop* and mount(8)). >Maybe

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, although it was not the final solution of this bug report, i beefed up my merger script for Debian ISOs so that it can combine an arbitrary number of ISOs (within the limits of /dev/loop* and mount(8)). Maybe it can serve as answer for the next time this wish comes up. The script is uploaded

New Ukrainian Mirror

Hello. Please add a new Debian CD mirror. Name: FastMirror Site: https://fastmirror.pp.ua/ Repo link: (http|https|rsync)://fastmirror.pp.ua/debian and (http|https|rsync)://fastmirror.pp.ua/debian-cd Admin Name: Ivan Barabash

Re: Question - links included are on www.debian.org

On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 11:07:40PM -0400, Armando Zuñiga wrote: > I would like to know what form I should fill out if I want to be a seller > of debian netinstaller installer pen drives or if I qualify as a debian CD > seller. > > I would like to be a seller of official debian images in Chile,

debian-cd: doc/FAQ in bullseye CD is outdated

Hi, When I comparing self-baked CDs with official CDs, I found the doc/FAQ of current released bullseye media is outdated. It's version is 10.0 (12 August 2019) and should be 11.0 (January 2021). For example, it says 'testing' is 'bullseye'. root@usblinux:/mnt# grep Bullseye README.txt

Question

I would like to know what form I should fill out if I want to be a seller of debian netinstaller installer pen drives or if I qualify as a debian CD seller. I would like to be a seller of official debian images in Chile, but the controversy that the CD's are staying is added.

Re: Bug#1012117: Failed integrity check live-11.3.0-amd64-mate+nonfree.iso

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:48:54PM +0300, Mikko Viinamäki wrote: > Package: debian-cd > Version: 3.1.35 > > Downloaded > https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/11.3.0-live+nonfree/amd64/bt-hybrid/debian-live-11.3.0-amd64-mate+nonfree.iso.torrent > and

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hello, Finally I set up my own mirror and I'm able to build my unofficial discs with debian-cd. Thanks Andy Cater and Linux-Fan for instructions! == ABOUT MIRROR == Currently I'm using the recommended ftpsync.tar.gz scripts to set up my

syslinux is marked for autoremoval from testing

syslinux 3:6.04~git20190206.bf6db5b4+dfsg1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192

debian-cd is marked for autoremoval from testing

debian-cd 3.1.35 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192 https://bugs.debian.org/1011146

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, for now it looks like the merged ISO works as fat DVD-1. I installed a Debian 11.2.0 system from the merged DVD-1+ DVD-2 ISO in a qemu VM via option -cdrom. Installation went smoothly. During reboot i aborted the VM to next deface the El Torito boot sector of the ISO. I removed the -net

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i uploaded the first version of my merger script as https://dev.lovelyhq.com/libburnia/libisoburn/raw/branch/master/test/merge_2_debian_isos Please download and give x-permission. The need for sudo can be avoided by already mounting the two ISOs at the chosen mount points before running

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

On Tue, 24 May 2022 00:51:35 +1200 Mike Hosken wrote: > Hi Arne, > > Just fyi, archive.debian.org or a mirror site has a copy of the distros you > have lost a long with the rest of the official Debian releases. > > Mike Hosken > Sent via my iPhone Thanks alot Mike! Looks good! Soon I

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi Arne, Just fyi, archive.debian.org or a mirror site has a copy of the distros you have lost a long with the rest of the official Debian releases. Mike Hosken Sent via my iPhone > On 24/05/2022, at 00:09, sp...@caiway.net wrote: > > On Sat, 21 May 2022 13:33:02 +0800 > Zhang Boyang

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

On Sat, 21 May 2022 13:33:02 +0800 Zhang Boyang wrote: > Hi, > > Indeed, I admit super-big-iso is a crazy idea, and a local mirror is > more useful in most cases. I think there is a few special cases that a > super-big-iso might be more useful. > > 1) Computers / Virtual Machines isolated

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, On 2022/5/23 01:18, Thomas Schmitt wrote: How can i verify that the resulting ISO properly announces all its packages ? (If i install it to a VM, what must i do to challenge its completeness ?) I came up with a idea. Maybe you can use 'debian-cd' to create a DLBD set, say disc A1 and A2,

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, i wrote: > > I began to ponder about a shortcut in libisofs which would trust the > > checksum file (-checksum-list , -md5-list) enough to omit the reading of > > all the package files' content. Steve McIntyre wrote: > Cute idea (grin!), but it's a non-started - we wouldn't be able to >

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hey Thomas! On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 12:03:23PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> youre initial guess is correct. We don't generate the .iso files >> at all for the larger images [1]. This means we also don't have >> torrent files for them [2]. > >I began to ponder about a

Re: OT: Setting up a local mirror [WAS Re: Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?]

Hi, Thanks for this information :-) I will try it. Best Regards, Zhang Boyang > Quoting myself - which might be bad form > > http://flosslinuxblog.blogspot.com/2020/02/rebuilding-mirror-software-mirroring-of.html > > gives the full steps to set up a mirror by editing one script, more or

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Steve McIntyre wrote: > youre initial guess is correct. We don't generate the .iso files > at all for the larger images [1]. This means we also don't have > torrent files for them [2]. I began to ponder about a shortcut in libisofs which would trust the checksum file (-checksum-list ,

Processed: Re: Bug#1011261: The digest algorithm in SHA512SUMS.sign is SHA256

Processing control commands: > severity -1 minor Bug #1011261 [debian-cd] The digest algorithm in SHA512SUMS.sign is SHA256 Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal' -- 1011261: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011261 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#1011261: The digest algorithm in SHA512SUMS.sign is SHA256

Control: severity -1 minor On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 12:31:28PM +0800, Zhang Boyang wrote: >Package: debian-cd > >Hello, > >I downloaded debian iso and its SHA512SUMS file. However, when I use gpg to >verify authenticity of SHA512SUMS, I found the signature file use SHA256 as >its digest algorithm.

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hey folks, On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 04:59:27PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >Andrew M.A. Cater wrote to debian-cd@lists.debian.org: > >> I don't actually know how long it take to create the .jigdo and .template >> files - I don't think it's as long as generating the full .iso files Whether you

OT: Setting up a local mirror [WAS Re: Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?]

[Here for anyone else that may need it - probably offtopic for this list after that.] On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 12:19:27AM +0800, Zhang Boyang wrote: > > On 2022/5/21 22:54, Linux-Fan wrote: > > > > I admit a local mirror is more suitable for large set of computers. > > > But for a small set of

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

Hi, Zhang Boyang wrote: > I guess there is no ready tool can merge two ISOs together. Not directly. But xorriso can load the meta-data of an ISO, manipulate that loaded model, and write the result as new ISO with the same boot equipment as found in the loaded ISO. As said, that would be no

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

On 2022/5/21 22:59, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Is there documentation from which i could learn how the stuff in (i guess) /dists of DLBD-1 and DLBD-2 could be merged so that it properly describes a merged pool tree ? My rough idea would be: - mount both ISOs - derive merged /dists files - run

Bug#1011343: WISHLIST: Offical ALL-IN-ONE images?

On 2022/5/21 22:54, Linux-Fan wrote: I admit a local mirror is more suitable for large set of computers. But for a small set of computers, for example, 1-5 computers, setting up a local mirror might be too heavy. Actually I think this may be a misconception. Setting up a mirror for

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >