Any call to this.method() will not process @ActionEvent annotation. That is
expected after the spring changes that were done. There's no change that can
be done to change that behavior, it's just how spring AOP work because it's
proxy based.
If you want @ActionEvent to be processed you must
I'm sorry, I thought I did this weeks ago. Do you not see the commit in
master? I'll double check, maybe I forgot to push.
Darren
From: Suresh Balineni sbalin...@juniper.net
Date: 2014-02-24 19:19:57 +
To: Darren Shepherd darren.sheph...@citrix.com,dev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17337/#review34170
---
Ship it!
Commit c1cfaa2d1c553d86ae35443d15100b20c2d1b69f
- Darren
this is the version I attempted.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2014 5:53 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alex Huang; Darren Shepherd
Subject: RE: Upgrade to newer version of gson?
Oh, a minor upgrade should be enough:
https://code.google.com/p
The names are cases sensitive. Is there a reason you put the name as lowercase
in the global configuration?
Darren
On Dec 19, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Darren,
I am trying to add a new implementation of SecurityChecker interface which is
an
definition in
the order config?
Thanks,
Prachi
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:30 PM
To: Prachi Damle
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Loading order of Adapter components
The names are cases sensitive
Cc'ing dev list from the right email
Darren
On Dec 17, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.sheph...@citrix.com
wrote:
I'll look at it, but that util method that loads the log4j-cloud.xml is still
being called, I can't remember the api off the top of my head.
My first guess would
with Sheng and couldn't find any open file
handles to any log4j-cloud.xml, which if this was done, will always have an
open file handle.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:16 PM
To: Alex Huang
I'll look at it, but that util method that loads the log4j-cloud.xml is still
being called, I can't remember the api off the top of my head.
My first guess would actually be that the file is getting loaded from a
different place than /etc. ACS packages a lot of files twice and I often see
the
Alright, this is long….
I have to say after the 10+ years of struggling with JDBC, Hibernate,
JbdcTemplate, JPA, QueryDSL, and countless custom solutions, I've have
never found a database access solution that has impressed me as much as
jooq. If I was starting from scratch today I'd definitely
PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
140 characters are not productive.
What would be your idea way to do distributed concurrency control? Simple
use case. Server 1 receives a request to start a VM 1. Server 2 receives
a request to delete VM 1. What do you do?
Darren
, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
You bring up some interesting points. I really need to digest this
further. From a high level I think I agree, but there are a lot of implied
details of what you've said.
Darren
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:39 AM, John
alena.prokharc...@citrix.commailto:
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com
Cc: Darren Shepherd darren.sheph...@citrix.commailto:
darren.sheph...@citrix.com
Subject: Re: Enabling AMQP/RabbitMQ Events on master
CC Darren here, I am having the same question on current master.
Thanks
-min
On 11/21/13
What's the procedure for making changes to 4.3? Obviously commit to master
and then cherry-pick but at this point is there any other control around
it? If I need to commit something in 4.3 do I just do it myself?
Darren
/ ELB automation blocked due to this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5224
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:29 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Darren
that operation?
Darren
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
You bring up some interesting points. I really need to digest this
further. From a high level I think I agree, but there are a lot of implied
details of what you've said
away from it so we can leave db choice to the operator in
the future!?!?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done a lot of analysis on the data access layer, but just haven't had
time to put together a discuss/recommendation. In the end
, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I've done a lot of analysis on the data access layer, but just haven't
had time to put together a discuss/recommendation. In the end I'd propose
we move to jOOQ. It's an excellent framework that will be very natural
I've done a lot of analysis on the data access layer, but just haven't had time
to put together a discuss/recommendation. In the end I'd propose we move to
jOOQ. It's an excellent framework that will be very natural to the style of
data access that CloudStack uses and we can slowly migrate to
- Darren Shepherd
On Nov. 8, 2013, 8:48 a.m., Damodar Reddy Talakanti wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15344
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14605/#review28546
---
Ship it!
Laszlo can you commit this?
- Darren Shepherd
On Oct
:: getComponent() ?
I used to call getComponent() to get the current list of
AffinityGroupProcessors enabled by the admin. The injected processor list was
added later to the class, I think I can use that for this purpose.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd
Can you point me to the code that is failing. The short of it is that you
shouldn't use ComponentContext. If you show me the failing code I can offer a
better solution or if needed a work around.
Darren
On Nov 5, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
, Long,
String, String)
com.cloud.event.ActionEventUtils.publishOnEventBus(long, long, String,
String, State, String)
com.cloud.event.UsageEventUtils.publishUsageEvent(String, Long, Long,
String, String)
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
I can't get an environment setup on master, basically everytime it goes to
start the SSVM or CP it tries to stage the template, then that fails
because the command is routed to LocalHostEndpoint and my mgmt server can't
mount NFS. Isn't there some special logic somewhere that knows the system
VM
an environment from scratch using a XenServer host.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can't get an environment setup on master, basically everytime it goes
to
start the SSVM or CP it tries to stage the template, then that fails
because
...@citrix.commailto:edison...@citrix.com
Subject: Re: does master even work? Can't start SSVM/CP
For what it's worth, I rebased on top of master today and was able to
create an environment from scratch using a XenServer host.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph
PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
The last commit is eb9cfffd246267bbb5fe4befeb9afeaaf366874a
Thanks
-min
On 11/4/13 3:36 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is the commit?
Darren
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote
, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Pedro Roque Marques
pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
Darren,
On Oct 31, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is fixed now.
Maybe i'm doing something really dumb... but i still see the problem.
I do see the commit afaf637 in the branch
I just noticed that opencontrail is in master. There is some small work
that needs to be done to make
org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.EvenUtils.EventInterceptor
work in the new Spring model. Is somebody working on this? Additionally
the new spring config needs to be setup for
Edison, Min,
When creating a Zone and there is no SSVM so it sends to
LocalHostEndPoint. I always get the below error. Is there some fix
for this?
ERROR [o.a.c.s.r.NfsSecondaryStorageResource]
(pool-4-thread-1:ctx-fb095de0) Unable to create local folder for:
I'll fix that. Gimme ten mintues. I specifically looked at that code
and thought I didn't change the behavior, but I guess I screwed it up.
Just a general comment. There's too many ways to do the same thing in
CloudStack. Especially the database. The way databases are setup for
developers
, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll fix that. Gimme ten mintues. I specifically looked at that code
and thought I didn't change the behavior, but I guess I screwed it up.
Just a general comment. There's too many ways to do the same thing in
CloudStack
wouldn't, some
ignored if the file was not found, some would just throw a NPE. So I
consolidated all that code.
Darren
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Ugh, I see what I did now. When I tested that code I changed the code
I didn't do a mvn
a script to
pre-populate system vm template. The thing I don't get is: what scenario
are you trying to do to trigger DownloadCommand when SSVM is not up?
Thanks
-min
On 10/31/13 9:32 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, that's not the problem
register template more than 5GB
we use multipart upload to push the files to Riak. But this does not work
for snapshots and volumes. This will be fixed in CS4.2.1 . But for template
registration it should work fine.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd
is crashed? Directly reporting error instead
of trying anything.
Thanks
-min
On 10/31/13 10:18 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's happening when I first create the zone. I'll debug it further to
tell
you exactly what its happening. But I don't understand how
GB.
Have you tried to upload the file to Riak CS using s3cmd outside of
CloudStack?
Thanks,
-John
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
My template is less than 5gb and it still uses multipart. I actually
don't think this is a CloudStack issue
Why do we have the configuration system.vm.use.local.storage? Why would
somebody care if they systemvm is on local storage? I'm guessing the idea
here is if it's on local storage we can't bring it back in a host failure
situation? But don't we just recreate the systemvm?
Darren
/CLOUDSTACK-4759).
Thanks
-min
On 10/31/13 10:38 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
The behaviour should be to delay until there is a SSVM available. I don't
know if that is even possible in CloudStack, I don't want you to sleep().
Is there any way to delay
[1] project to build local instances for
development and testing.
Thanks,
-John
[1]: https://github.com/basho/vagrant-riak-cs-cluster
On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
My template is less than 5gb and it still uses multipart. I actually
The following code results in a NPE in bad situations
templatePoolRef =
_tmpltPoolDao.acquireInLockTable(templatePoolRefId,
storagePoolMaxWaitSeconds);
if (templatePoolRef == null) {
if (s_logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
s_logger.info(Unable to acquire lock
', or 'Started'/'Running' then no actions are taken.
In your scenario, the system VM would still be 'Started' in the database even
though communication is lost to the host, so no automatic action would be
taken.
- Original Message -
From: Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph
given the vagrant project a go (increase
the memory in vagrant-overrides.conf to 2 GB). In addition to be a known
good configuration, it is a common reference point for support.
Thanks,
-John
On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:14 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15108/#review27875
---
On Oct. 31, 2013, 12:18 a.m., Darren Shepherd wrote:
---
This is an automatically
I use it all the time with -T 1.5C and it makes my build twice as fast.
But I do it with the assumption that it may void your warranty.
Sometimes things blow up, and then I go back to single threaded. So it
kinda works, but it does blow up.
I wouldn't recommend most people use it. For people
This would be a great thing to try at the CCC hackathon. Docker poses
some interesting challenges and to do a useful integration is going to
take some careful design. There's two things to consider. First,
docker's #1 feature in my mind is that it is a paradigm shift. You
interact with docker
class that handles the basic cases of
traffic type, network type, etc.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
On 30 okt. 2013, at 02:09, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
First, I like the idea of consolidating logic. I could see also
. For example, whether a certain NetworkElement can work with
the L2-L3 technology deployed.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 10:11 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Huang; Chiradeep Vittal
Diffs
-
utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/MacAddress.java 15350c8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15108/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Darren Shepherd
, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a specific reason that in MacAddress it uses ifconfig or
other utilities to grab the Mac Address as opposed to the java API
java.net.NetworkInterface? There's a comment in that code that says
that code was copied
I'm neutral on this change. I don't care too much
either way as I think down the line this all needs to change.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Pedro Roque Marques
pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Pedro Roque Marques
pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
Why ? That seems to me the most obvious way to do it.
There are different networking solutions: e.g. VLANs and overlays such as
OpenContrail that assume an L3 switching topology. For a deployment one
Has anybody gotten CloudStack and Riak-CS to work together. No matter what
I try when it goes to download and save the template, after its posted a
series of multi part uploads it ends up sending a 403. The access log
looks like
127.0.0.1 - - [31/Oct/2013:05:41:11 +] PUT
+1
When you merge you will get a conflict in the spring configuration.
componentContext.xml and others are gone now in master. You will need
to update to the new style. The easiest will be to refer to XenServer
spring config for an example of how to do it. You can largely copy
and paste the
:49:35PM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote:
It would be really nice if the API failed if cloudmonkey exited with
!=0 exit code. I've been scripting some stuff with cloud monkey and
this makes it difficult. It would also be nice to somehow specific
which field you want printed. So when I do a create
First, I like the idea of consolidating logic. I could see also
implementing this as just an abstract base class that handles this
common logic. I'm not sure which approach I prefer. Exactly what is
the problem that you are trying to solve? Without more details, I'd
lean towards implementing
that comes with tests covers
enough of itself.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:00:46PM +0100, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Ok, makes sense, but that sounds like even more work :) Can you share the
plan on how will this work?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
I don't know if a similar thing has been talked about before but I
thought I'd just throws this out there. The ultimate way to ensure
quality is that we have unit test and integration test coverage on all
functionality. That way somebody authors some code, commits to, for
example, 4.2, but then
want to go deeper, then you need a bigger
effort testing the components.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if a similar thing has been talked about before but I
thought I'd just throws this out there. The ultimate way
It would be really nice if the API failed if cloudmonkey exited with
!=0 exit code. I've been scripting some stuff with cloud monkey and
this makes it difficult. It would also be nice to somehow specific
which field you want printed. So when I do a create command I can say
just echo id value
up again
and run the commands you sent me over the next couple of days.
Thanks,
Marty
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Well that wasn't very useful message. If you can find the cloud-utils
jar on your server run
java -cp PATH
, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Glad that helped. Seems that we should change CloudStack to ignore mac
addresses that are 00:..:00. If you want to put in a bug you can assign it
me and I'll look into changing that.
Darren
On Oct 26, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Marty Sweet
!
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll fix that.
Darren
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
wrote:
I'm getting this failing unit test when building with the latest
from
master
Is there a specific reason that in MacAddress it uses ifconfig or
other utilities to grab the Mac Address as opposed to the java API
java.net.NetworkInterface? There's a comment in that code that says
that code was copied from some public domain utility. So I'm guessing
its there just because
bitten me in the past. It doesn't
tolerate new NICs well, for example in development when a mgmt server is
also a host and a link local bridge is created. Seems bad form to just run
ifconfig and grab the first Mac you find.
On Oct 26, 2013 5:12 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote
, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I completely agree and part of why I want to change it. On my machine my
wifi and Ethernet devices sometimes swap as being first in the list and it
doesn't seem to like that at all. I don't know if it's because my
is FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF. So all packets leaving your VM go to
the same place and then EC2 magic ensues
Darren
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Hmm. Windows may not work then? Needs testing
On 10/24/13 5:04 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
I'll fix that.
Darren
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I'm getting this failing unit test when building with the latest from master.
Anyone working on it or know what it is already? From the stack, it looks
like it's a problem location the jdbc
PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll fix that.
Darren
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
I'm getting this failing unit test when building with the latest from
master. Anyone working on it or know what it is already? From
Whenever I use marvin on master I get
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 610, in module
deploy.deploy()
File ./tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 596, in deploy
self.loadCfg()
File
, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
The hashes that are on c.a.o for the releases have a format like
http://www.apache.org/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.2.0/apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2.sha
apache-cloudstack-4.2.0-src.tar.bz2: CC487DF3 7E7B6800 F9DC05A3
from master branch and used marvin to deploy few
cloudstack entities and it worked. Can you please provide the command you are
using to run marvin tests? or what command lead to the below trace?
Regards,
Santhosh
From: Darren Shepherd [darren.s.sheph
My guess, I don't really know, would be because its hard. The VR uses
link local for the control network so 169.254/16 is bound to the wrong
nic. To fix this you just need some ip routing magic in linux (credit
goes to Kris Lindgren who showed me how to do this). Add the below to
a file,
received this email in error, please immediately notify the
sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message
and its attachments.
On 10/24/13 9:12 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
My guess, I don't really know, would be because its hard. The VR
Let me clarify some terms first, this might be confusing. There is
instantiation and then there is initialization. Instantiation is
calling the constructor. Initialization is calling the
@PostConstruct. Beyond that there is what I've been calling
CloudStack Extended Lifecycle, This for bean
Yes avoid ComponentContext.inject() at all costs. It is really bad.
The problem with ComponentContext.inject(), besides that it is a bad
programming pattern, is that it doesn't know which spring context you
are in. So ComponentContext.inject() will inject only beans that are
defined in the core
– Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:08 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
So I'm saying if you want to disable a command you put myBadCmd=0 in
the commands.properties. So yes, a blacklist over a whitelist. For
people paranoid about maybe some
/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure
On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.commailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
But how does one validate it? I just wrote a dumb script to
concatenation, remove whitespace, lowercase and then pass to
sha512sum -c. I've
-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 8:13 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: klindg...@godaddy.com
Subject: Re: Metadata URL location
My guess, I don't really know, would be because its hard. The VR uses link
local for the control
Chris,
This change was simple enough I just put up a review for it
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14914/ You want to download the patch
and see if that works for you?
Darren
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently any new API extension
/StaticRoleBasedAPIAccessChecker.java
affcf91
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14914/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Darren Shepherd
to logging facility under marvin.
Thanks!
Santhosh
From: Darren Shepherd [darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 11:00 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: is marvin on master broken?
Traceback (most recent call last
Never seen that, but yeah that's an issue. It's possible given the
current initialization in ACS to somebody tries to lock something
before the lock manager is created. That should change let me
look at that. I can probably fix it on master.
Darren
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Mike
Is there a reason not to verify authenticity and validity of the
tarball with the gpg sig?
Nope, just laziness.
Darren
have to send another (169.254.0.0/16) route in
the DHCP response to point to the VR.
Additionally in basic zone the anti-spoof filters in dom0 would have to be
adjusted to let 169.254.169.254 addresses
On 10/24/13 8:51 AM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
So additionally
, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Never seen that, but yeah that's an issue. It's possible given the
current initialization in ACS to somebody tries to lock something
before the lock manager is created. That should change let me
look at that. I can
Refer to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Extensions
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Plug-ins%2C+Modules%2C+and+Extensions
In short your can either add/remove jars from the classpath or use the
*exclude properties to disable elements. Exclude
Just throwing this out there. We all know the maven build is slow.
It never donned on me until now that maybe maven would have a parallel
build option and it does [1]. I wouldn't recommend this for official
builds or jenkins jobs, but for developers use the parallel build
option. Basically add
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14823/#review27296
---
On Oct. 22, 2013, 3:34 a.m., Darren Shepherd wrote
Chris, Edison,
You guys just committed 'Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot.' At
the same time I was merging both my txn-refactor and
spring-modularization branches. They are really tricky merges and
each time I have to rebase it takes awhile to figure out. Anyhow,
your change + my changes
, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chris, Edison,
You guys just committed 'Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot.' At
the same time I was merging both my txn-refactor and
spring-modularization branches. They are really tricky merges and
each time I have to rebase it takes
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chris, Edison,
You guys just committed 'Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot.' At
the same time I was merging both my txn
.
--
Chris Suich
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
The transaction API was changed in the merge. I could have maybe
missed
chris.su...@netapp.com
NetApp Software Engineer
Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
Okay let me look at that. Are you 100% sure your looking at a clean version
of master?
Darren
:48 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
I fixed all the compilation errors in engine/storage/integration-test.
I don't know how to run those test though, so I can't validate the
changes.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
I fixed all the compilation errors in engine/storage/integration-test.
I don't know how to run those test though, so I can't validate the
changes.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM
Platforms – Cloud Solutions
Citrix, Cisco Red Hat
On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:39 PM, Darren Shepherd darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com
wrote:
So your asking to not use the sorting logic and instead do the style of
Priority highestPriority = Priority.CANT_HANDLE;
Priority priority = strategy.canHandle
Updated f3e968b9830a667cb3b55477f1fe8259e56ceffb
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, I don't really care, I'll just change it to how it was
before. I'll remove the get methods that return a collection.
Darren
On Wed, Oct 23
I've noticed that when I bring up my mgmt server theres a period of
time in which the storage capacity numbers are wrong. When the mgmt
server starts I deploy a VM and it fails because the below message
indicates storage is at 124% used
Checking pool 2 for storage, totalSize: 33808039936,
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
