ich could be my first touch
> point. I first have to get familiar with all the formal topics but I will
> try.
> So, I'm in.
>
> 2016-07-26 9:41 GMT+02:00 Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org>:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freem
the pen and also answer to the above.
>
> Pradeep.
>
> From: Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 11:59:34 AM
> To: Daniel Dekany
> Subject: Re: FM Online improvements (Was: Graduation issues)
>
> Monday, June 27, 2016, 8:24:21 AM, Daniel Dek
AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the pointer, I have sent an announcement to there (I
>> guess... haven't shown up yet.)
>>
>
> Daniel, annou...@apache.org requires subscription for posting.
> I guess your post would awaiting moderation.
file so that I do the copying.
The important thing is that it must not affect the jar that Ant
builds. That is, the metainfest generated by the Ant build must win.
> If you have ideas or tips, let me know.
>
>
> 2016-07-28 20:34 GMT+02:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>:
>
>&
>
> References:
>
> [*] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Cool, thanks!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@
thout that
>> 2. Fill blanks left on the status page
>> =
>>
>> into this one:
>>
>> =
>> Most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>
>> 1. Make sure that the project's status page is updated
&g
or Project logo as sign of affiliation". Since it's a "SHOULD" is
> fine; but I'd recommend to add the Incubator logo somewhere in the site
> template.
>
> Thanks!
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> How do you mean this to be combined with "Discuss the project's
>> graduation on the general list"?
>>
>
> Yes, besides simply say &qu
for open source
projects and for personal use, and it doesn't even miss any features
that we need: http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/download.shtml
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
he release
repository... but that's an old artifact there.)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
ocess have stabilized
> in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation
> status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of
> the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by
> the ASF."
>
> On F
LD" is
> fine; but I'd recommend to add the Incubator logo somewhere in the site
> template.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Wednesday, February 1, 2017, 9:36:41 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
> On 28/01/2017 18:08, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> So this meant to be kind of a survey, rather than a proper vote, and
>> for now we use the logo only on Twitter, and it can be changed
>> anytime. Here's what we hav
d
#include), and instead tell the users to build on
TemplateConfiguration-s if they have templates with various charsets
or have some non-parsed templates.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Tuesday, February 7, 2017, 7:40:18 AM, David E Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 23:47 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>
>> Should the TemplateResolver-s (the work name for the new interface)
>> still get the template name already resolved to absolute and
>> normaliz
In case you have missed it in the other thread, note that it seems
that there won't be a new alternative TemplateLoader interface in FM2,
so this will have to be solved with the existing TemplateLoader there.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Wednesday, January 25, 2017, 4:17:10 AM, Roberto Benitez
Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 1:14:37 PM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> Hi Daniel
>
> I understand your point and have included some responses inline.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 08/02/17 12:35, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 10:29:39 AM, Sharan Foga wr
weeks so, yeah,
I'm a bit behind with FM. Anyway, that will generate a few Tweets
too.)
> Thanks
> Sharan
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
;. Jacques, do you have the right to do
that?
Saturday, January 21, 2017, 6:48:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Le 21/01/2017 à 17:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:17:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Le 21/01/2017 à 16:11, Daniel Dekany a é
w that no <#ftl encoding=...> can come anymore, and
so you are safe. If <#ftl encoding=...> interferes, we will have to
reset() the stream, recreate the InputStreamReader, and parse again.
(We don't re-read from the TemplateLoader, we just re-parse.)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Sunday, January 22, 2017, 5:05:58 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>>
>> Though it's still a good point that we should say something to the
>> users... Right now, the best they can
ing names we should only support camel
>> case too (FM2 supports both). Those are used outside templates too,
>> like when you load the configuration from *.properties.
>>
>> Of course, if someone uses a snake case name, we would tell in the
>> error messages that names are camel case since 3.0.0.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel Dekany
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
, 3:00:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Any news about this? Somebody contacted them?
>
> It would help to push INFRA-13246
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 03/01/2017 à 13:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if
Saturday, January 21, 2017, 3:08:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Le 02/07/2016 à 10:29, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> Very long ago I have started using XMLmind XML Editor (XXE) free
>> edition for editing our Manual and other DocBook material (like our
>> web site). Others
>>> This is not mandatory, but I think that taking time to diligently complete
>>> the answers may be useful for this project both as an internal assessment
>>> and as a document that we will share to the Incubator PMC when they will
>>> be
>>> called to vote for the graduation.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>> Any volunteer to create a page in our wiki that we could use to work at
>>> the
>>> document together?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:17:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Le 21/01/2017 à 16:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> Nope (as far as I know)... I was hoping that INFRA-13246 will have
>> some kind of positive feedback first, but it seems it has to be the
>> other way around the
er}.
>> All rights reserved.<#t>
>> +http://schema.org/Organization;
>> itemprop="copyrightHolder" href="http://freemarker.org;>$
>> {copyrightHolder}<#t>
>> +<#if copyrightSuffix??>. ${copyrightSuffix}<#t>
>>
>>
>>
>
> This is minor but I think we should change the url of the "copyright
> holder" from freemarker.org to apache.org.
>
> Jacopo
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
g something?
I don't know, it's visible for me. Maybe you haven't waited for the
publishing commit, or it's a browser cache issue?
> Jacopo
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
> jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Da
Tuesday, January 24, 2017, 6:27:38 AM, Roberto Benitez wrote:
> I am working on a TemplateLoader implementation that loads from a
> database. From a previous e-mail with Daniel Dekany, he mentioned
> that this is something you still need, and may be interested in integrating.
> I hav
t;give me a template like this somehow" method, and
default implementation that delegates to TemplateCache.
> Hopefully this is helpful feedback, ie the need for and one approach I've
> found to a simple override for all Template loading.
>
>
>
> -David
>
>
&
hristoph Rüger: #1.5
Denis Bredelet: #2
Mauricio Nuñez: #3
Jacques Le Roux: #1 #2 (counted as two 0.5 votes)
Jacopo Cappellato (PPMC): #1.5
Piyush Mor: #3
Julien NICOLAS: #1.5
Barrie Selack: #3
David E Jones (PPMC): #3
Kirys: #1.5
Daniel Dekany (PPMC): #1.5
Thus the result:
#3: 5 total (2 PPMC)
#1.5:
Saturday, January 28, 2017, 6:08:16 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
[snip]
> I guess both the #1 and #2 votes would gravitate towards the more
> similar #1.5, rather than #1.
[snip]
I ment "rather than #3"...
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
lateLoader be that drastic?
It's a completely new interface.
> Sometimes it is feasible to deprecate old/non-conformant methods
> (perhaps provide defaults that rely on the new methods), which can
> later be removed completely.
> --Roberto
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
1, 2017, 8:58:29 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Wednesday, January 11, 2017, 3:50:50 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
[snip]
>>> (2) Unify freemarker.template and freemarker.core, under o.a.f
>>>
>>> In FM2 we have a separate freemarler.template package, which contains
>>&
ports the stuff like the "else", "sep", "items"
directives.
- Drop these long deprecated built-ins directives
(http://freemarker.org/docs/ref_depr_builtin.html):
"default", "if_exists", "exists", "web_safe".
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Tuesday, January 17, 2017, 1:46:53 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> FM2 traditionally uses a weird naming convention, where directive
> names are all-lower-case (like #elseif), and other names use snake
> case (like ?upper_case or date_format). For a while it also supports
> camel case (
ould say something to the
users... Right now, the best they can do is figuring out who the key
personal are, and write to them privately.
> Jacopo
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Tuesday, January 24, 2017, 9:27:37 PM, David E Jones wrote:
> On Jan 24 2017, at 10:25 am, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> Tuesday, January 24, 2017, 6:48:16 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
>>
>
>> > but all other Configuration.getTemplate() me
ecause the data-model
uses that anyway (as it comes from Java).
As you might notice, currently the focus is on removing stuff, because
doing that the earliest makes refactoring less expensive.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Friday, February 17, 2017, 3:16:28 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>> Friday, February 17, 2017, 6:52:15 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@f
at we have a DefaultTemplateResolver, not a generic
TemplateResolver), nor does it deal with the configuration aspects
discussed today. But it shows an idea for the main functionality.
Tuesday, February 7, 2017, 11:59:08 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Tuesday, February 7, 2017, 7:40:18 AM, David
Friday, February 17, 2017, 11:48:34 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>> Friday, February 17, 2017, 3:16:28 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:22 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek..
In case someone, especially PPMC members, want to follow this, note
this post from general@i.a.o:
This is a forwarded message
From: Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org <gene...@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 7:39:23 PM
Subje
://freemarker.org/sourcecode.html)
Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 3:32:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Done, good news :)
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 08/02/2017 à 15:03, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>> They say the are will to donate the freemarker-online source code to
>> ASF.
t;
>
>
> 
>
>
> On Feb 24 2017, at 9:18 pm, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> In FM3, I propose removing some
Friday, February 24, 2017, 10:42:46 PM, Barrie Selack wrote:
> I'd probably add something (like tester) as just -online doesn't seem to
> say what it is.
So then how about incubator-freemarker-online-tester? (I'm not afraid
of long names... :) )
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Dani
the time.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
radle (which would be strange), then only
FM3 will switch to Gradle.
> Am I correct in my conclusions so far?
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> Tuesday, February 14, 2017, 7:53:36 PM, Mauricio Nuñez wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
Saturday, February 25, 2017, 5:28:25 PM, Denis Bredelet wrote:
> Hi,
>> Le 25 févr. 2017 à 10:16, Christoph Rüger <c.rue...@synesty.com> a écrit :
>>
>> +1 for incubator-freemarker-online-tester
>>
>> Am 25.02.2017 11:10 vorm. schrieb "Daniel
ctory just
a builder? Then instead of set/getObjectWrapperFactory we had
set/getObjectWrapperBuilder, and that's one less class (no need for
XxxFactory).
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
r way around... they
are similar, that's my point). Both suppresses the LHO null, but in
one case you tell FreeMarker to do what a lenient language would do,
while in the other you tell FreeMarker to pretend that the value was
the value of the 2nd exp. (BTW, ${x!} would print nothing, and
${x!'none'} would print "none". Because ${varName} is the most basic
and frequent thing people do, it matters that this use case looks
quite natural: If you didn't tell what to print, it prints nothing,
and if you don't like that, you can add after the `!` what to
print.)
OK, so that's part of my plans regarding null handling. (There's more
to it, but I try to not overload a thread.)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
a committer enables easier contribution to the project since
there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should
enable better productivity.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Wednesday, February 15, 2017, 12:16:12 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>> I propose that in FM3 Configuration should only have two constructors:
>>
>> Configuration(Version incompatibleImpro
and a subclass that
adds setters... (That might will be necessary because that Template is
mutable with setters is not all right either. Or we can just throw
IllegalStateException there too.)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
now only handles this
>> target, I will try to deliver something soon but this work should really go
>> in baby steps ... it was overwhelming to try to do it all in one shot.
>> Perhaps I can put a skeleton and we can work together to improve it.
>>
>> Anyway, sit tight,
properties) should be enough,
and then, the user is forced to collect all the properties together
(coming form different source maybe, that's why he collects them), and
the we can do a proper ordering because we have all of them at once.
Thoughts?
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
teResolver=com.example.MyTemplateResolver(mySetting="foo")
there), then obviously templateResolver.mySetting wins.
And if we support the dotted notation in j.u.Properties, that should
work for the objectWrapper setting too, naturally.
Tuesday, February 7, 2017, 11:59:08 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Tuesd
e
> perspective on the difference this might be helpful ->
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24852219/android-buildscript-repositories-jcenter-vs-mavencentral#28457914
>
> Cheers,
>
> Taher Alkhateeb
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
t 1:42 PM Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache FreeMarker
>> (incubating) has invited Woonsan Ko to become a committer and we are
>> pleased to announce that he has accepted.
>>
>
> Please note - t
keep those setters in the Configuration, then they should forward to
the templateResolver, if it implements the interface that contains the
setter.
> -David
>
>
> On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 14:56 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> An interesting consequence of introducing the TemplateResolv
the
// default. Called isFooExplicitlySet() in FM2.
Any thoughts? Especially on what to do with those nested settings.
Wednesday, February 15, 2017, 8:54:52 PM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>> Wedn
Thursday, February 16, 2017, 5:33:01 PM, David E Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 15:56 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Thursday, February 16, 2017, 6:17:00 AM, David E Jones wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > This is cleaner, more obvious what
Friday, February 17, 2017, 6:52:15 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>> One other problem I see with builders is that they seem to be
>> difficult to work with when it comes to working out the Configurat
vote for your favourite! https://s.apache.org/UuC1
>
> What do people think?
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Monday, January 16, 2017, 10:58:18 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>
>
> On 14/01/2017 12:24, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Saturday, January 14, 2017, 12:06:07 AM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>>
>>> I'm agree that the is visually better and better for understanding
>>&
I vote for the 1st.
Monday, January 16, 2017, 12:11:18 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> We will replace our square logo at Twitter
> (https://twitter.com/freemarker), and probably will use the same logo
> in the future elsewhere too.
>
> Which one do you prefer from the *top* row (1,
DocumentBuilderFactory used by
> NodeModel.
NodeModel instances don't use the DocumentBuilderFactory.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
deal with those 12+ java.time classes
(otherwise the user had to copy-paste some long configuration
fragment). Also we should add a few variation of `.now` that returns
the value with Java 8 types.
What do you think about this approach?
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
doing this.
We might even want to require Servlet 3.0 and JSP 2.2, from Java EE 6
(December 10, 2009), just to make things easier in the future, though
at the moment we don't utilize that.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
ditional involvement from the
>> freemarker twitter followers. The proposed tweet is as follow:
>>
>> - Help us choose our new twitter logo. Check out the options and vote for
>> your favourite! https://s.apache.org/UuC1
>>
>> What do people think?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sharan
>>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
affect the names defined by FreeMarker, not the names
coming from the data-model.) That yet again simplifies tooling too.
Any thoughts?
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
che exists on the Configuration level, and each request
will have a different set of additional templates.
> Let me know if I am getting it wrong.
>
> Pradeep.
>
>
>
> From: Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 2:22 AM
> To: Pradeep
o my next question .. for the very first step, if I cut all the
> fat away, then the main focus of the compile target is the javac
> commands .. is this correct? Yeah I know you're patching and
> whatnot, but let's do this in baby steps if I may?
That was the plan, yes.
> Cheers,
>
&
gt; wrote:
>> +! for incubator-freemarker-online-tester
>
> +1. Me too.
>
> Regards,
>
> Woonsan
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>>
>>> Friday, February 24, 2017, 10:42:46 PM, Barrie Selack wrote:
request at latest when I get back to
FreeMarker (in November, I hope). That's also when I plan to start the
FM 3 branch, and then I can be more active in working out the
modularization and such too.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Thursday, September 22, 2016, 2:08:18 PM, Mauricio Nuñez wrote:
> Hi Dan
r wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
to be <#include 'foo.txt' parse=false>.
Tuesday, October 18, 2016, 4:03:15 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I have a local .txt file. Is there an easy way that I can import
> the contents of this file?
>
> John
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
Friday, January 13, 2017, 8:09:42 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Friday, January 13, 2017, 5:23:10 PM, Julien NICOLAS wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Here a new try with the egg logo for Apache Incubator ;)
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNdl
ouldn't be reasonably noticable without
scrolling.)
As of the "<#>", a bit less nice, but makes more sense semantically...
I think that's a good compromise (for a Twitter logo). Perhaps the
shape of the # and spacing around in could be tweaked to look better,
but I don't know.
> Julien.
back!
The point of this was to simplify legal things. At this point, we
don't include anything in freemarker.jar that was developed outside
the FreeMarker project.
BTW, this was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-17.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
r.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Looking for help to maintain/improve the graphics of Freemarker
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Here a new try with the egg logo for Apache Incubator ;)
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5BwTaGcWGtNdlVRWE42TklZM1U
>>
Friday, January 13, 2017, 1:07:36 PM, Christoph Rüger wrote:
> 2017-01-13 1:17 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>:
>
>> Friday, January 13, 2017, 12:08:12 AM, Christoph Rüger wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for everything.
>> >
se look good to me. Always feels good to clean out old and unneeded code.
>> :)
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:58 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>>> I have collected some further easy changes for FM3... Any comments?
>>>
&
Drop legacy XML wrapper (freemarker.ext.xml, not to be confused with
freemarker.ext.dom)
- Drop ant task (freemarker.ext.ant)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
legacy "utility" TemplateModel-s
which make `?new` rather dangerous.
> 2017-01-12 23:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>:
> I have collected some further easy changes for FM3... Any comments?
>
> - Drop FTL classic compatible mode option (Roughly emulates FM1
>
g/committer-howto.html
>>
>> Interested in a simple Freemarker UI? Share your ideas and collaborate with
>> us
>> https://s.apache.org/yQUr
>>
>> What's on your Freemarker wishlist? It might come true! Share your ideas on
>> our dev mailing list d...@freemarker.apache.org
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sharan
>>
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
to improve or change some
>> of its graphic elements e.g. a higher resolution logo for Twitter, some
>> design work to include the Apache Incubator "egg" and the beloved Apache
>> "feather" etc...
>>
>> Volunteers?
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
m the main site.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mauricio
>
>
> 2017-01-12 10:56 GMT-03:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>:
>
>> As far as I know these aren't used much anymore. So I suggest we drop
>> them from FM3 (which isn't compatible with FM2 anyway). They would be
>> include a brief one sentence description of the function of the software
>> product itself
This one at least doesn't hurt (much), so let's do it, and thanks for
noticing.
> What do you think? If there are no objections or better ideas I will submit
> a pull request.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
> [*] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#naming
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
later.)
Any objections/thoughts?
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
ila, was one of the developers of Nashorn at Oracle. AFAIK he did
most of the interaction between the JavaScript and Java word... pretty
hard core stuff.)
> Regards,
>
>
>
> 2017-01-12 11:50 GMT-03:00 Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>:
>
>> The question here me
At least now it stars the editor when I press Edit.
Wednesday, January 4, 2017, 7:26:55 AM, David E Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 10:26 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> I have added our report to
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017. PPMC members, please
>&
gt; project awareness to wider audiences.
>
> Anyway please let me know if you are interested, and if so then I'm happy to
> help.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
ws digest mostly?
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>> All in all, it would be nice to make some good noise about FreeMarker :-)
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>> [*] https://twitter.com/freemarker
>>
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
think? I would be happy to submit a pull request, but I will
> need some help to locate where the footer is defined.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jacopo
>
> [*] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#attributions
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
I have added our report to
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017. PPMC members, please
read it, and sign it off if you agree!
Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 8:53:12 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
>&g
ps://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online
>>
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for OFBiz
> I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this task.
>
> Jacques
>
>
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
ree with to keep it as is, not impacting
> users. I want to contribute my changes to FM3, but now, FM2 it's a good
> codebase to test, and to be more involved as developer.
>
> Btw, I've create a pull request to fix some Junit tests.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mauricio
&g
;> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
>> > jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I did and bravely publi
s" setting had to be added to docgen itself for
this.
> Thanks,
>
> Jacopo
>
> [*] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#attributions
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
101 - 200 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
