Den 17.08.2011 16:19, skrev Arnaud HERITIER:
Hi all,
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be done at Eclipse.org under EPL 1.0
license.
Before they were published under ASL or dual ASL/EPL licenses thus as
defined in our policy [1] this change put them in Category B [2] and we need
to
ok, you're right that it wasn't clear in vote options but I said it in the
first sentence.
It is effectively what I had in mind (EPL at Eclipse.org)
Others are agree to restart ?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
Den 17.08.2011 16:19,
yes, please restart with the clarified phrasing (as we already voted explicitly
against this very topic).
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 8/18/11, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Usage of Aether and Sisu as dependencies of
ok thus the vote is cancelled
I with relaunch it with the good options.
Nothing else to improve in it otherwise ( to not restart 4 times) ?
Arnaud
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
yes, please restart with the clarified phrasing (as we already voted
Hi all,
We're using the Maven Site to generate and publish to our intranet. The PMD
report provides valuable intel on project and code health and we've been using
it quite successfully for a long time. Recently we decided to introduce Sonar
to provide additional metrics, trend insight, etc.
Nah; with the change I think this is a nice vote, and it's about time we
have it!
Kristian
Den 18.08.2011 11:01, skrev Arnaud Héritier:
ok thus the vote is cancelled
I with relaunch it with the good options.
Nothing else to improve in it otherwise ( to not restart 4 times) ?
Arnaud
On Thu,
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a better
scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at Eclipse.org under EPL
1.0 license.
Before they were published under ASL or dual ASL/EPL licenses thus as
defined in
+1 binding
Kristian
Den 18.08.2011 11:23, skrev Arnaud Héritier:
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a better
scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at Eclipse.org under EPL
1.0 license.
Before they
Hello,
Done.
Thanks for the patch !
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend : http://talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
2011/8/18 Tjerk Stroband tstrob...@davincigroep.nl:
Hi all,
We’re using the Maven Site to generate and publish to our intranet. The PMD
report provides
Many many thanks!!!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Olivier Lamy [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Verzonden: donderdag 18 augustus 2011 12:32
Aan: Maven Developers List
Onderwerp: Re: [PATCH] Maven PMD Plugin / MPMD-127 - Report cannot correctly
handle external PMD ruleset as exported by Sonar
+1 (non-binding)
/Anders
2011/8/18 Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a better
scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at Eclipse.org under EPL
1.0 license.
Before
Hi Olivier,
the change
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1158917
while properly fixing the stuff mentioned in commit log, sneaks in
another change that is wrong.
The searchFlat can return empty results with multiple index if the
first used returns empty result fix is okay, and
Hello,
Thanks for the review, the use cases and the explanation !
1 beer for you ! :-)
2011/8/18 Tamás Cservenák ta...@cservenak.net:
Hi Olivier,
the change
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1158917
while properly fixing the stuff mentioned in commit log, sneaks in
Jason, Brian, Benjamin or any other person involved,
Before voting on this issue, I'd like to get an idea what it means for us. So
please allow me a few questions:
a.) how can appache maven committers anticipate on aether over at Eclipse? What
if someone (like me) likes to contribute, but
Mark, Can it possibly matter what the java package names are? There
are ton's of wierd historical package names floating around the
universe. There is no requirement for incubating Apache projects to
move package names just for the sake of moving them. I think that
'sonatype' in a package name is
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:17:49 AM Benson Margulies wrote:
Mark, Can it possibly matter what the java package names are? There
are ton's of wierd historical package names floating around the
universe. There is no requirement for incubating Apache projects to
move package names just for
Benson, I think you got this completely wrong.
I don't care about the eclipse policies. But IF eclipse says they like to
change the package names, then WE have to change all our aether imports and
retest all that stuff...
If it stays com.sonatype, then otoh we don't need to do much...
On Aug 18, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Jason, Brian, Benjamin or any other person involved,
Before voting on this issue, I'd like to get an idea what it means for us. So
please allow me a few questions:
a.) how can appache maven committers anticipate on aether over at
Sorry, all, I didn't realize you were asking about the *practical*
issues with the package names. I perceived a nonexistent ideological
dispute.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi Jason,
Txs 4 the answers.
Changing the package names would of course require some more work on both
sides, but at the end it might even be better for the long run. For example
using the sonatype name in a package might later cause your company
troubles/discussions with Trademarks and
No worries mate, no reason to excuse :)
The question was good, I just didn't think about any ideological at all so I
was a bit surprised as well :)
I just try to figure out what aether@eclipse means to the Maven project in
practice. What do we need to change over here, how to cope with changes
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Jason,
Txs 4 the answers.
Changing the package names would of course require some more work on both
sides, but at the end it might even be better for the long run. For example
using the sonatype name in a package might later cause
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Jason,
Txs 4 the answers.
Changing the package names would of course require some more work on both
sides, but at the end it might even be better for the long run. For example
Otoh it would require us to go through maven-core and all plugins to
change imports. So either way is ok, but we need to know the direction.
I wouldn't make client code have to change anything.
For any thirdparty lib we are using in core, on Maven APIs
(org.apache.maven) should be
Hello,
Perso the license question doesn't matter a lot as long we have a
compatible one with ASF.
Have a look at tomcat 7 or the cxf distribs which contains ecj and/or
jetty so the Eclipse license is not a trouble for ASF products (sure
at least for me).
My main point is more regarding the
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
Otoh it would require us to go through maven-core and all plugins to
change imports. So either way is ok, but we need to know the direction.
I wouldn't make client code have to change anything.
For any thirdparty lib we are
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
Perso the license question doesn't matter a lot as long we have a
compatible one with ASF.
Have a look at tomcat 7 or the cxf distribs which contains ecj and/or
jetty so the Eclipse license is not a trouble for ASF products (sure
at
c.) will the package names remain com.sonatype or will they get changed to
org.eclipse.*? This is important for us to know. If so, we can just cancel
the vote and wait for this stuff to be released at Eclipse.
Changing that should be like 20 minutes work, as long as they only
change
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a better
scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at Eclipse.org under EPL
1.0 license.
By staging a dual release of maven-archiver and maven-jar-plugin. So now
you have 3 days to fix the adding of
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/ or whatever to
hudson ;)
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
So I reformulate my question : 'how to be in the initial set of
committers ? too late ?
2011/8/18 Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
Perso the license question doesn't matter a lot as long we have a
compatible one with ASF.
Have a look at
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
c.) will the package names remain com.sonatype or will they get changed to
org.eclipse.*? This is important for us to know. If so, we can just cancel
the vote and wait for this stuff to be released at Eclipse.
Changing that should
Oki Kristian, and you will go on and do all the release cascade stuff - thanks
mate :D
Nah seriously, it will be a bit more work. The groupId will change too most
probably, and we would need to dig into maven and mojo plugins too ...
@Jason:
The difference between 'Hudson' and 'Sonatype' is
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
So I reformulate my question : 'how to be in the initial set of
committers ? too late ?
Just ask. As I posted previously, anyone who wants to be listed as a committer
I will add.
2011/8/18 Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org:
On Aug 18,
2011/8/18 Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
So I reformulate my question : 'how to be in the initial set of
committers ? too late ?
Just ask. As I posted previously, anyone who wants to be listed as a
committer I will add.
Oups I missed.
So
Me also, or should we ask on the eclipse aether list? (is there such a list
already?)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 8/18/11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
From: Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Usage of Aether and Sisu as dependencies of maven core
with EPL licenses -
I'll get Wayne Beaton to add yourself and Olivier to the proposal.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Me also, or should we ask on the eclipse aether list? (is there such a list
already?)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 8/18/11, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
From:
Hi,
The main intention of this release is to get java7 file attribute api's
in use, which can be a great performance improvment for java7 mac
linux users. There should also be some improvement for 1.5/1.6 users,
and this release is java 1.5+.
These are totally new apis and I appreciate java7
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Me also, or should we ask on the eclipse aether list? (is there such a list
already?)
Not until project provisioning, which happens when the project creation review
is over next week.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 8/18/11, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non-binding).
--
Baptiste
Le 18 août 2011 11:25, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a better
scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at Eclipse.org under
+1 (non binding)
Manfred
On Thu, August 18, 2011 7:08 am, Ralph Goers wrote:
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:23 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a
better
scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases
I'd like to be added as well please.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org wrote:
I'll get Wayne Beaton to add yourself and Olivier to the proposal.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Me also, or should we ask on the eclipse aether list? (is there
And me, please.
On 8/18/11 1:01 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
I'd like to be added as well please.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Jason van Zylja...@maven.org wrote:
I'll get Wayne Beaton to add yourself and Olivier to the proposal.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Me also, or
+1 binding
Hervé
Le jeudi 18 août 2011, Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a
better scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at Eclipse.org under
EPL 1.0 license.
Before
Here is my +1
Hervé
Le lundi 15 août 2011, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
Hi,
These are parent POMs for Maven projects: version 21 for Maven parent,
version 22 for Maven Plugins parent and version 17 for Maven Shared
Components parent.
We solved 11/7/7 issues:
You've all be added to the proposal:
http://eclipse.org/proposals/technology.aether/
On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:50 PM, John Casey wrote:
And me, please.
On 8/18/11 1:01 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
I'd like to be added as well please.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Jason van Zylja...@maven.org
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): John Casey, Mark Struberg, Stephen Connolly, Olivier Lamy,
Vincent Siveton, Brett Porter, Hervé BOUTEMY
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Hervé
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design Best Practices (24 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
48 matches
Mail list logo
