Re: drop ressources (stlport, maybe beanshell)

Hi guys; FWIW, I am involved in beanshell in my spare time, which is not plenty lately. As mentioned previously it is in github now and a much improved version will be released one day (no ETA). While looking for candidates to remove stuff, consider stax. It is included in Java since JDK5.

repository archeolo-git needed

Hi; Apparently the old mercurial repository that the OOo team did in bitbucket is no more, and we know that because the link in our sources page is not there. For those of you that were not around, Oracle wanted to transfer the history from the repositories but the process to convert everything

Re: System-provided Python 3 support now committed

Hello; For the record, I only did a small "scotch tape" fix, the heavy lifting was done by Damjan. My public thanks to him as this is likely to save AOO from deprecation (at least in FreeBSD). I think in the future we may move to tauthon, as an interim step before Python 3:

Re: Update to python-2.17

On 2020-01-10 13:24, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 10.01.20 um 07:14 schrieb Pedro Giffuni: >> Hi again; >> >> On 2020-01-04 05:16, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Unfortunately the b

Re: Update to python-2.17

On 2020-01-10 14:53, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 10.01.20 um 20:50 schrieb Pedro Giffuni: >> On 2020-01-10 13:24, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Am 10.01.20 um 07:14 schrieb Pedro Giffuni: >>>> Hi again; >>

Re: Update to python-2.17

On 2020-01-10 13:24, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 10.01.20 um 07:14 schrieb Pedro Giffuni: >> Hi again; >> >> On 2020-01-04 05:16, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Unfortunately the b

Re: Update to python-2.17

there will be a final 2.7.18? Yes, there will be a final release in a couple of months, but most linux distributions (and FreeBSD) are already deprecating py27 and anything that depends on it. Thanks for your patience! Pedro. > Regards, > >    Matthias > > Am 04.01.20 um 02:41 schrieb Pedro G

Re: Update to python-2.17

Hi Matthias; Sorry about that. I could've tested better the patch. I will fix the obvious issues and will let you guys know. Pedro. ps. It may take me a while though, I am getting busy very fast :( On 2020-01-01 21:30, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello AOO devs and best wishes for the New Y

Update to python-2.17

Hello AOO devs and best wishes for the New Year! Well ... time has passed and Python 2 is now deprecated! I have a patch here to update AOO 4.2's version of Python to the latest (perhaps last) release in that line: http://people.apache.org/~pfg/patches/patch-python-2.17.diff This is a remake

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

Hi; Some notes, which I don't expect will be particularly useful ... - I recall one of the reasons for using Boost and not the native STL was that the old MSVC compiler (the one AOO still uses) is poor on standards compliance. It may be that the internal Boost can be updated a bit more but

Python 2.7.16 update

Hello guys; I never had the time to test?? a minor update to Python. From the update notes it doesn't seem urgent, but feel free to give it a spin and commit if ready: http://people.apache.org/~pfg/patches/patch-python-2.16.diff Cheers, Pedro.

Re: get Revision from Git (short Hash)

Hello; Unfortunately including the date breaks reproducible builds: https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/timestamps/ I suggest to try using the the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable if/when it is defined. Thanks, Pedro.

Re: beanshell

Hi Sorry for noticing late. beanshell was relicensed under an Apache License starting with bsh 2.0b5. Apparently I had something to do with breaking the beanshell build (thanks for fixing): on FreeBSD we use the external (prepackaged) beanshell which is 2.0b6. Pedro.

Re: Future development discussion

Win64 is also making good progress behind the scenes. The uncommitted Win64 UNO bridge I've been coding (a lot of it in AMD64 assembly) should now be able to call arbitrary C++ methods from UNO and UNO methods from C++ (not tested yet), but the poorly documented internals of MSVC C++ exception

Future development discussion

Hi again; I just wanted to stop by and share some ideas of things that need to be done in AOO after 4.2. Easier things: OpenSSL has to be updated, yet again, and while the future versions will be under an Apache License, making things nicer for us, the API has been changing so we may need

Re: AOO 4.2.x development branch created

Hey guys! Thank you to everyone getting involved in the new release. It is very much needed and I was really tired of the continuous revamping of the 4.1 releases. It is now clear that we are also doing proper branching of the releases. Some of the issues off the top of my head that you may

[HEADS UP] Python update coming to trunk.

Hello guys; I have an update to the internal python 2.7.14 -->2.7.15 that will likely hit the tree later today.The change is not major but it is important due to security updates. So far it has only been tested on FreeBSD. I don't expect major adjustments for other platforms: In AOO we

Re: Memory management strategy

On 3/25/2018 10:44 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Somewhat related ... > > I have been considering the use of APR pools: > > http://www.apachetutor.org/dev/pools > > It would be great to have the memory managed by the same technology used > in Apache httpd. I need to th

Re: First steps in building with MSVC 14 / Visual Studio 2015

Hi again; On 03/13/18 13:10, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi Damjan; Glad to see this progress! To build python with newer versions of MSVC, you may have to change the BUILD_DIR to "PCbuild". Look at main/python/makefile.mk line 125. I committed a small adjustment in r1826694, to clar

Re: First steps in building with MSVC 14 / Visual Studio 2015

Hi Damjan; Glad to see this progress! To build python with newer versions of MSVC, you may have to change the BUILD_DIR to "PCbuild". Look at main/python/makefile.mk line 125. Cheers, Pedro. ps. As a reminder, the ASF has access to MSDN in case someone wants to help.

Re: Win64 port started, and how building 32 bit AOO on Win64 could break soon

Hi Damjan; I personally think it would be better to start by upgrading MSVC, but in any case... Here are some hints from LibreOffice: http://tml-blog.blogspot.com.co/2011/03/ Cheers, Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Ubuntu 14.04

Hi Jim, Playing around w/ building 4.1.5 and 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 14.04... Will update the wiki as required (already found 2 dependencies we were missing) This is good news, as this is the platform used by travis-ci: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/reference/overview/ Any chance you could get to

Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes

Hello everyone! Just my $0.02 Hi After days of failing to add a few new simple features to gbuild, I've now reached my limits, and have begun experimenting with the SCons build system instead. It's starting to work. Having ported some of gbuild.mk, LinkTarget.mk and platform/freebsd.mk to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 as GA

+1 (non binding) It’s about time ;). Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

report builder jar files

Hi Don; > I'm attempting to update the FreeBSD openoffice-devel port, which is a > snapshot of trunk, and add an option to enable the report builder > extension. That requires a whole bunch of .jar files. Where should I > get those? … Sometime ago I preventively copied them to our ooo-extras

Re: Increase minimum Java version from 5 to 7/8 ?

Hello guys; While updating the java requirements, please someone remove StaX API (main/stax) from the build. I recall it was only used for Java versions < 5. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Merge wish list for AOO 4.1.4

Hello; Well I haven't hidden my lack of love for AOO 4.1.4: it's been like two years of development in trunk with none of it finding it's way into the release. Last year I sort of went on with it because 4.1.4 was supposed to be inminent, but since it's taking so long I made a list of

Re: Please someone release 4.2.0 (or something else ...)

Hello; Testing on the Mac is specially welcome. I am not sure the gbuild changes have been tested well there, so that's something to look at. I think it may be a good idea to use "--with-alloc=system",and that applies to 4.1.x as well. Pedro.

Please someone release 4.2.0 (or something else ...)

Hi guys; It seems like the imminent release of 4.1.4 got stuck and it is not clear if it will happen or when. Sadly, I don't really see anything interesting that 4.1.4 will add to 4.1.3. I find it terribly demotivating to spend time on AOO's trunk when it's not clear if it will see the light

Re: OpenOffice Windows builds

FWIW, Porting OpenOffice to MSVC 2015 is not an easy task, porting to MSVC 2010, OTOH should be reasonably simpler and likely doable. I am not volunteering though :-P. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Access to the OpenOffice Buildbot boxes

Hello; Just IMHO.. it would be very valuable for our build experts to take a look at travis-ci (through github) and getting Coverity back up. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

Re: AOO now builds with Clang on Linux

Hi Damjan; Looking at the log I was wondering what exactly clang 1.8 was and I took the liberty of fixing the mismatch ;). FWIW, AOO should now work fine with clang 3.9.1. Clang 4 reveals allocation issues. If someone is wondering why we/you should be using clang, note that the FreeBSD buildbot

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Some misc. comments: In reply to Peter Kovacs; Would it be more wise to go for BSD as OS instead of one distribution FreeBSD? Or are BSD variants incompatible to each other? BSD variants are certainly incompatible with each other as the result of about 25 years of divergence. AFAICT, the

Re: svn commit: r1780202 - /openoffice/trunk/main/README

Hi Marcus; On 01/25/17 23:41, Marcus wrote: In general the addition is OK. However, there is not yet agreement what "supported" means. So, just to add FreeBSD to the list doesn't work as it's not the same as for Win, Linux, Mac where we have a different definition. Marcus I avoided making

Re: [lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

On 01/24/17 , Marcus wrote: Am 24.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Pedro Giffuni: Our README states that currently supported platforms include: Windows, MacOS X, Linux variants and OS/2. I would like to add FreeBSD to the list. I have no idea if such status requires some formal procedure so I

[lazy consensus] FreeBSD as a new supported platform?

Hello; Our README states that currently supported platforms include: Windows, MacOS X, Linux variants and OS/2. I would like to add FreeBSD to the list. I have no idea if such status requires some formal procedure so I will ask here: FreeBSD is AFAICT, the only OS that ships AOO in it's

Re: Google Summer Of Code 2017

BTW, JFYI ... Last time I tried to mentor for the ASF, I was told I had to ask the PMC and get their OK first. Pedro. On 01/22/17 20:38, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi Yakov; I have mentored previously for other organizations. I could consider mentoring this year if there is an interesting project

Re: Google Summer Of Code 2017

Hi Yakov; I have mentored previously for other organizations. I could consider mentoring this year if there is an interesting project. Regards, Pedro. Is it planned in this season participated Apache Open Office in Google Summer Of Code ?

Re: Jars for Report Builder: where to get them ?

Nevermind .. I found them. On 01/14/17 11:05, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi; Anyone has the jars required by the report builder [1]? I think we should upload them to a folder in ooo-extras. Regards, Pedro. [1] http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/About-reportbuilder-source-code-td4672788.html

Jars for Report Builder: where to get them ?

Hi; Anyone has the jars required by the report builder [1]? I think we should upload them to a folder in ooo-extras. Regards, Pedro. [1] http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/About-reportbuilder-source-code-td4672788.html

Re: future of OpenOffice

Quoted from the posting from Simon Phipps dated 12 Jan 2017: ... The Document Foundation takes much of the Apache OpenOffice AL2 licensed software and rebases LO on it. This allows integration of OpenSymphony code. Completely permissible under the AL2. They re-did the license of all the source

Re: svn commit: r1777198 - /openoffice/trunk/main/configure.ac

Hi Don; On 3 Jan, p...@apache.org wrote: > Author: pfg > Date: Tue Jan 3 18:37:15 2017 > New Revision: 1777198 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1777198=rev > Log: > Ignore the OS when checking for the ARM target. > > Linux is not the only ARM target - see i117017. Won't we also need

FYI: github mirror is broken

FWIW, The github mirror stopped updating the source tree over 10 months ago. Cheers, Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Reproducible builds ...

Hi; On 12/21/16 11:54, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; It would be important to work on Reproducible builds: https://reproducible-builds.org/ The first issue to be resolved is that the executable should NOT carry the date it was built. We could carry the SVN revision value instead. Perhaps

Reproducible builds ...

Hello; It would be important to work on Reproducible builds: https://reproducible-builds.org/ The first issue to be resolved is that the executable should NOT carry the date it was built. We could carry the SVN revision value instead. Perhaps someone may be interested in hunting down here

Re: OpenOffice on KDE 4 issues

Hello; Interesting (I use KDE but have never enabled the KDE option). FWIW, there is/was a KDE4 CWS in the archive: https://bitbucket.org/mst/ooo340/branch/default?head=4cb6c97c0ec77613a9501fca04793f23a982adbb Regards, Pedro.

Re: SVN broken and unable to revert bad commit

Hi Damjan; Strange ... I just made the revert for you, without any problem. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

-1 I doubt the "simplifications" are sufficient to make the code any more readable. Much better to spend time on something else, like updating hunspell. Pedro. On 06.12.2016 18:31, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all I'm going to the configure

Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

FWIW; I think OpenIndiana still ships an older version of AOO: https://www.openindiana.org/ You may ask Alexander Pyhalov: I did merge a bunch of his patches (with changes) into AOO so it may be easier to build nowadays although it is surely a bumpy road. Pedro.

Re: Meson: yet another build system

Objective C? Yacc? Cygwin? Custom compiler flags to disable C++ exception handling, build some files with optimizations disabled? Our build systems are not our biggest problem. Meson, or SCons, or others, could be good if we were starting a new project. We aren't. We are maintaining one we

Re: serf has wrong download link in the bootstrap

Fixed in r1772065. FWIW, I think it was not visible, as in breaking the build, because it was falling back to the sourceforge site. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Meson: yet another build system

http://mesonbuild.com/ Features * multiplatform support for Linux, OSX, Windows, Gcc, Clang, Visual Studio and others * supported languages include C, C++, Fortran, Java, Rust * build definitions in a very readable and user friendly non-turing complete DSL * cross compilation

Re: Building with the latest SDK on Windows

Hi Raphael; I would expect trouble building with the latest MSVC: at least python requires some changes in the build support and it may also involve losing support for Windows XP. I think it should be possible, and advantageous, to update to MSVC 2010 first. Note that Apache committers have

Re: Code signing available for OpenOffice

FWIW, I attended the code signing related talk at ApacheConEU 2014. While it only applied to Windows, I think it is important to sign binaries: AOO is a wide target for the wares sites and it's a matter of fact they may add spyware. I suspect the App Store won't be available to us since they

Discussion for ApacheConEU

Hello; At this time I can say I will very likely be at ApacheConEU, independently of my talk being accepted or not (thanks to TAC!). Depending on how many of us attend, I think we should take the chance to have a round-table discussion, similar to the one we had at ApacheconEU 2012. The idea

Re: Fwd: [Issue 125147] CRASH applying styles to text

Hello; I have no intent of getting in the way of 4.1.x (x >=3), I understand it is important for the project to show it's capacity to push out a new release in a short time. OTOH, we were caught unprepared, as we had abandoned the 41 branch completely about 11 months ago. Given this is

Access denied on bugzilla ...

FWIW ... I just tried to access BZ 127117, which I created in the first place, and now I got "You are not authorized to access issue #127117." It is only a very minor update to openssl, and I wanted to submit the patch to do it.(AOO bugzilla and I have never been in a good relationship). While

Re: 4.1.4 Release Manager?

Hi Patricia; I am rather amazed by the idea of 4.1.4, shouldn't we release 4.2.0 instead? I mean ... - I thought the idea behind 4.1.3 was to make a quick fix for 4.1.2 and to give more time for the 4.2.0 release process. - the code in trunk has over two years of development and is more

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

In response to truckman; > On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote: Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open to arguments. Have all of the necessary

Re: Differentiate or Die

Hi Jörg; ... > From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:p...@apache.org] > The thing about so-called "marketing gurus" is that their assumptions > about how the markets work may break down when we are talking about > software that has zero cost. > > I will simplify the m

Re: Differentiate or Die

Hi Phillip; The thing about so-called "marketing gurus" is that their assumptions about how the markets work may break down when we are talking about software that has zero cost. I will simplify the marketing issue making a bold statement: "We have millions of users because we do 80% of

Re: OOo extras

On 09/03/16 11:07, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; FWIW, the apache-extras.org site that carried the OOo extras tarballs has been redirected to the sourceforge site. The oooextras.mirror site at sourceforge has a circular reference to the OOO Extras Web Site that is now redundant. Someone

Re: Presence at ApacheCon Europe, November

Hi Andrea; Pedro Giffuni wrote: I had already submitted a talk for this year's ApacheConEU Ah, nice! An OpenOffice-specific talk or a generic one? I mean, would it fit into a (hypothetical, of course; everything depends on reviewers) OpenOffice track or not? It is about random number

OOo extras

Hello; FWIW, the apache-extras.org site that carried the OOo extras tarballs has been redirected to the sourceforge site. The oooextras.mirror site at sourceforge has a circular reference to the OOO Extras Web Site that is now redundant. Someone with access, please upload the Python-2.7.12

Re: Presence at ApacheCon Europe, November

> Hello guys; > > Before "the dramatic events of the last hours" I had already submitted a > talk for this year's ApacheConEU (Sevilla is such a nice city to have a > conference!). > > I understand that AOO people may feel discouraged now to attend but I > don't really believe any form of boycott

Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?

Hello; At this time I am unsure what the Board wants from the project. They probably want to see more activity and may recur to artificial numbers like number of commits, number of active developers, or releases. I very much doubt actions from the Board will solve anything, it's the PMC and

Re: [DISCUSS] What Would OpenOffice Retirement Involve? (long)

Hmm ... the discussion sounds a bit like Brexit ... With the important difference that it is now evident that Brexit didn't have a plan. Having a retirement plan is important for our users and for the ASF and while I think the discussion is sane and important I think we should focus now on the

Re: Python update for testing

On 09/01/2016 Kay Schenk wrote: On 09/01/2016 11:17 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; The python we are carrying for AOO 4.2.0 (2.7.8) has many security vulnerabilities which may or may not have an effect on AOO. In order to make future updates and particularly for Python 2.7.9, in fact, we

Python update for testing

Hello; The python we are carrying for AOO 4.2.0 (2.7.8) has many security vulnerabilities which may or may not have an effect on AOO. In order to make future updates and particularly for Python 2.7.9, in fact, we also needed to update OpenSSL, so now that Don updated OpenSSL the basic update

Re: Release 4.2: Regressions for investigation

Hello; FWIW, I fixed Issue 124091 a while ago. The commits are registered in Bugzilla. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Putting Windows First ( was RE: null)

Hi Patricia; I, for one, appreciate the idea: 80% of the users are Windows people and the project should be focusing on improving the experience on that platform. OTOH, most of the active developers work on UNIX variant (and I suspect FreeBSD is the majority lately). I conceptually

Re: dmake

On 28 Aug, Gav wrote: when did you try that last Don? That url comes up oops 404 I last tried that in the last few weeks, but have been using a cached copy since then. This page lists lots of mirrored copies: It looks like

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

Hi again; ... I did update most of the components you mention and even gave a talk about it ;). It looks like the others are: ucpp We are using the latest version. Hmn, I wonder why the FreeBSD port is using the bundled one. I think we just don't have an option in AOO to use an

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

Hi Don; On 24 Aug, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 08/24/16 10:34, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; ... * [low priority] Updated bundled CoinMP. There has been an API change, which prevents the FreeBSD port from using the system version. Difficulty unknown ... This is important, I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

On 08/24/16 10:34, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; ... * [low priority] Updated bundled CoinMP. There has been an API change, which prevents the FreeBSD port from using the system version. Difficulty unknown ... This is important, I was unaware of it. Sadly, I don't think I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

Hello; Here is my list: * Update bundled redland / rasqal / raptor to fix a CVE. This is currently in progress. The FreeBSD port has been using the system versions of the latest and greatest. This is difficult because of dependencies between the three and the way the configure

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 4.2: General Topics

First of all ... huge thanks to Kay for taking over as Release Engineer. On 8/23/2016 12:14 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: ... > 2. Update Java requirement from Java 1.5 to *at least* Java 1.7 > > I am rather adamant that we change our building requirement to Java 1.7 > for all platforms. I

Re: upgrading bundled openssl

Hi Don; Thanks for working on this! Two crazy ideas here: 1) Perhaps bundling libressl instead of openssl make sense? 2) It would be really nice if we were able to use encryption in other components: apr-utils and curl, for example. Pedro.

Buildbot wishlist ... Fwd: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has approved a third-party application that you use

Hello; This is interesting but I have no time to investigate it. There's also travis-ci which would be a nice-to-have alternative to the ASF buildbots and I think they also support MacOS X. Pedro. Forwarded Message Subject: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has

buildbot wish ... Fwd: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has approved a third-party application that you use

. Forwarded Message Subject: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has approved a third-party application that you use Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:39:46 -0700 From: The Apache Software Foundation <nore...@github.com> To: Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> An organizati

Re: Merge with LibreOffice?

On Aug 3, 2016 10:00 AM, "Christoph Reg" wrote: > Regardless of why or how, > when it comes to development, it's clear that LO has won. Hands down. > LO gets more commits in one or two days than AOO had since the > beginning of the year. The second part of the claim is probably

Re: FW: buildbot success in on aoo-win7

Congratulations to Damjan!! Now .. if we could just find a way to cut down the red tape and push out a new release we would be just fine. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

Hi Damjan; I am back to gbuild, have moved my Windows VM's disk to the faster ext3 filesystem, and have begun doing the only thing I can think of to debug this: manually "bisection testing" the gbuild-reintegration branch to try isolate which patch causes the build performance regression. There

GPL vs Apple Store (was Re: null)

Hi Damjan; ... GPL apps are apparently not allowed in the Apple App Store ( http://www.zdnet.com/article/no-gpl-apps-for-apples-app-store/), and if the source code is under the GPL, it doesn't stop being so in binary form, so I'd love to know how they get away with it. Damjan The GPL vs Apple

ApacheConEU 2016

Hello; There was already a Call for Papers but this year I have seen very little publicity around ApacheConEU, so let me point you directly to the site: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-europe November 16-18 Seville, Spain. It sounds like a wonderful place to discuss

Re: [QUESTION] Dependency on OpenSSL

Hi Dennis; I recall discussions of OpenSSL and updating our dependency on it to a better/patched version. What I don't know is whether the binaries that are built and distributed directly by the project incorporate OpenSSL in any manner? Can anyone clear that up? 1. Do our built binaries

Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing all tracking from AOO sites

Any news on this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Updating APR ...

e work and pretty much depends on my spare time. If the Java replacement plans advance sufficiently to get rid of SAL then ... great! Pedro. On 05/24/16 12:20, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; As part of some enhancements I am preparing to generate better random numbers, I took a look at the random n

Updating APR ...

Hello; As part of some enhancements I am preparing to generate better random numbers, I took a look at the random number generator in SAL and I found it's very limited. I think even the "regular" KISS PRNG I implemented in Calc does a better job generating random numbers but instead of moving

RE: svn commit: r1745006 [3/9] - in /openoffice/trunk/main

Hi Dennis; So you noticed such changes are burdensome ... The situation is more or less this so that you understand: - I have had those changes in my HD for a least a couple of months now, I was tired of them, - I considered dropping them but it was quite some effort (time), and the changes I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing all tracking from AOO sites

In reply to Kay; ... Ever heard of Big Data? This information will be correlated along with the latest searches and will be sold for commercial value to other companies and will also likely be available to the governments of the world at request. For whatever Mr. Trump may find it useful is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing all tracking from AOO sites

Guys, please ... I just wanted to give a short update into my investigation of our Google Analytics usage. ... * There IS general individual usage collection in some reports but the "user" information is translated into something called a "client id" -- so not by IP. Let's just not be naive

RE: images

FWIW; The Galleries are not produced and maintained by Apache OpenOffice. The catalog and collection of clipart downloads are maintained as a service between Apache OpenOffice and SourceForge. The images are from third parties. Gallery sets/extensions are offered under licenses specified

RE: [PROPOSAL] Removing all tracking from AOO sites

+1 I should note, I used to have access to the Google Analytics stuff when I was in the PMC. It was set up by Rob Weir under consensus. It is certainly a form of tracking and, at least I, have no idea what purpose it has served. From some time I have had no access it as it mysteriously

Re: Development updates

Hello Damjan; I have been focusing on my other favorite open-source project lately, which has been just fantastic but completely unrelated. I won’t get you guys bored with the details ;). Coincidentally, I do have a patch with the hsqldb2 update, based on the older CWS from SUN, and I have a

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

Thank you for the report Damjan :( Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

Hello; FWIW, I am preparing a second round of spelling fixes ... it's a quite big change. I would prefer to do such changes *after* the new build system is in place though. I can deal easily with any breakage caused by the spelling fixes but it may not be very fun to have to fix again the build

Re: 5. Any system which depends on human reliability is unreliable

IMHO, The affirmation is worthless BS. Computers are designed by unreliable humans and are therefore unreliable. Software is absolutely unreliable. We measure the laws of physics and science based on what we observe. but we cannot observe reliably so our conclusions are unreliable ... oh and if

Re: Release Manager for 4.2.0?

Hi Don; On 28 Mar, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > In reply to Don, >> The versions of openssl and curl badly need updating for the same >> reason, and there is one CVE for serf. > > FreeBSD casually keeps some backported updates for the same openssl > version AOO uses: > &

Re: Release Manager for 4.2.0?

In reply to Don, FWIW, On the topic of updates ... Some of the external software that is bundled has security issues. I put together a patch for nss here: . The version of libxml currently bundled also has a lot of known vulnerabilities. I'm

  1   2   3   4   >