optimizations apply nor do I see how LLVM rules apply. I
thought JIT behavior was only controlled by what the JLS said.
Still hoping to learn more…
david jencks
> On Sep 16, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 16/09/2015 06:38, David Jencks wrote:
>>
saying it ‘has
different logic” and “has a timing window” might be true but don’t directly
mean that if violates the ch. 14 semantics.
Hoping to learn more….
david jencks
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Yilong Li <yilong...@runtimeverification.com>
> wrote:
>
> Your argume
patterns like this consistently. I think that the only practical way
to detect these is through analysis tooling, so I’m glad to see it exists.
thanks
david jencks
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Yilong Li <yilong...@runtimeverification.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 201
we could investigate something like giving any other-project committer with
interest in working on a spec jar commit rights in geronimo. I don't think
spec jar releases have ever been a big timing/delay problem.
thanks
david jencks
On May 16, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
Geronimo's xbean-finder also supplies this functionality using asm.
david jencks
On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:55 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 June 2013 17:35, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
wrote:
Mark,
On 6/14/13 12:21 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/06/2013 16:57
On Apr 21, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Jeremy Boynes jboy...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 11:04 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
IMO you have misinterpreted roles in the ee specs. The specs including the
servlet spec define application roles and base the declarative security
are not roles and that you need a flexible
mapping between them. (see the sun-web-app snippet at the bottom).
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Currently, Tomcat only checks against security-role-ref elements if
there is a call to isUserInRole
Umm, a few years ago I was quite interested in implementing it for tomcat, but
couldn't raise any support over here. I still think the geronimo-tomcat-jaspic
integration could be adapted to tomcat standalone pretty easily, although I
don't think I'll have time to work on it.
thanks
david
/external/trunk/tomcat-archetype with
e.g an example of what you get from the script
underhttps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-parent-7.0.19
david jencks
On Dec 19, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/19/2011 07:04 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Exactly. Since any
Thanks for your brevity, Mark
On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/12/2011 18:47, David Jencks wrote:
Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
of tomcat svn and puts
On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:06 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
of tomcat svn and puts it in an appropriately structured
realized discussion was useless.
Maven prevents problems like this through the project structure. If this
situation is not a problem to the tomcat community, then the other possible
benefits of using maven are not likely to be interesting either.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 17, 2011, at 12:48 PM
/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-archetype with
e.g an example of what you get from the script under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/external/trunk/tomcat-parent-7.0.19
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 17, 2011, at 1:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'll try to keep it short because I
copy in
apache svn.
thanks
david jencks
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/10/2011 17:09, David Jencks wrote:
If using a non-tomcat groupId is the
only choice I'd keep the openejb copy in apache svn.
That is not an option that is acceptable to the ASF infrastructure team.
In this context, it's pretty much
Thanks for your response!
On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/10/12 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com:
I've been working with someone who has deeply nested SimpleTags (generated
from jsp source) that use a lot of regular Tags. By default the jasper
generated code
.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
-config.xml discovery that geronimo has more or less working solutions
for. If you run into these kinds of problems any solution will be proprietary.
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 6, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Misha Koshelev wrote:
Hi David and all:
Thank you for the reference to the Geronimo project.
http
Would you consider putting the time unit (seconds) in the param name or at
least in _all_ the javadoc? Without documentation I would expect the natural
time unit to be minutes.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:22 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Oct 29 23:22:35
added through
ServletRegistration. I added some hooks in one of my patches so the info got
to an appropriate class but only implemented the actual processing in geronimo.
see https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50015
thanks
david jencks
2. It does.
3. It does (as have all 7.0.x
that svn
history will be preserved. A patch just from svn mv won't result in proper svn
history (and I think also won't actually add the content to the files at the
new location)
david jencks
Wes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
is that checking them into svn usually
causes far more problems that it solves. Maybe you'll be lucky and solve more
than you cause. If I'm the only IDEA user I'd appreciate your not putting IDEA
specific files in svn.
thanks
david jencks
technology-compliant implementation. I guess this means that unless tomcat
implements web profile they don't have to support this? It still seems like a
good idea to me.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hello,
I want to bring this question again.
Why do
On Sep 15, 2010, at 10:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think this is how AsyncContextImpl creates async listeners (lines 228ff)
@Override
public T extends AsyncListener T createListener(ClassT clazz)
throws ServletException
;
throw new IllegalArgumentException(sm.getString(
applicationContext.addListener.iae.wrongType,
t.getClass().getName()));
}
which doesn't accept AsyncListeners. (of course it shouldn't do anything with
them).
Thoughts?
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think this is how AsyncContextImpl creates async listeners (lines 228ff)
@Override
public T extends AsyncListener T createListener(ClassT clazz)
throws ServletException {
T listener = null;
try
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:48 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/09/2010 00:54, David Jencks wrote:
I've recently rewritten the geronimo-jetty integration to work off the
servlet 3 *Registration classes. This works great except for servlets
backed by jsp files, since there's no way to tell
attribute?
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
to be remarkable reluctance on the part of users to consider
trying it. Do you have any idea why?
thanks
david jencks
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
this in error
to me as if all
the features in your brief description are now supported by ee specs, which
also offer the advantages of container managed authorization.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
Hello
On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/04/2010 23:40, David Jencks wrote:
I'd be curious how many of the features in securityfilter can be done with
servlet 3 (which includes the ability for an app to programatically force a
login) and jaspic (jsr 196) which provides for pluggable
application classes is reasonable. I'll try to come up with a patch
using this additional method in the next day or two.
thanks again!
david jencks
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
so
I'm assuming it's not really needed.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 5, 2010, at 9:41 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/01/2010 02:46, Tim Whittington wrote:
No need to re-post. A ping would have sufficed.
We've experienced similar issues
to find out if the split into catalina.jar and
coyote.jar works in osgi?
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 19, 2009, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
In the tomcat-7 geronimo/osgi integration we've run into a problem
when tomcat loads listener classes using Class.forName. Using the
InstanceManager
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4992
Many thanks!
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Mark,
I've verified that your fix in rev 890479 works great for this.
Many thanks for fixing it so quickly!
david jencks
On Dec 14, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/12/2009 03:58, David Jencks wrote:
I can verify by experiment that the 2nd solution fixes the problem
with
jspC
and confirmation that my
theories on what is wrong are reasonable.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 13/12/2009 09:50, David Jencks wrote:
It looks to me as if the problem is that no JarScanner is installed
in
the ServletContext used by JspC. (There definitely isn't one
installed,
and I think that is the cause of the problem). So
. Are you using a SPNEGO enabled
browser on a platform where it can recognize your (client side)
kerberos login? Do you have a link to a description of how SPNEGO is
supposed to work?
thanks
david jencks
Thanks and Regards
Ashish
On 11/13/09, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri
.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec/1.0-EA-SNAPSHOT/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 4, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi, anyone
On Aug 4, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
does it load all the classes?
IIUC no, it uses asm for byte-code inspection without loading classes.
thanks
david jencks
I think byte code check might make more sense if that is the case
Filip
On 08/04/2009 01:50 PM, David Jencks
not expect to be
providing any patches to tomcat for this. I'm happy to talk about the
code, but I'm more likely to see discussion on the geronimo dev list.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
the identity info including the principal but that trying to enforce
usage of a particular principal class is not a good idea. cf the
jaspic integration I mentioned the other day.
thanks
david jencks
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
as fallback for the remaining
dependencies.
I didn't mention this before either but I don't understand why tomcat
is rebuilding the eclipse code. The released eclipse jdt jar
available from maven central seems to work fine.
thanks
david jencks
Regards
--
^(TM
than
using a maven like project layout whether you use maven, ant, ivy, or
something else. Maybe an ant expert can come up with something.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
/plugins/tomcat/geronimo-tomcat6
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
think that was the intention.
I thought I made it pretty clear we need you to make a release
from trunk. Like I said its been more than 2 years since tomcat
accepted the annotations patch with no trunk release but general
agreement that the patch couldn't go into the 6.0.x branch.
david
platforms including java, .net, c++, etc.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 4, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
So in essence you have a new protocol but the sole
difference is how you describe
(as done in tomcat today) and
jacc based permission checking (as done in geronimo and presumably
other javaee integrations such as jboss)
thanks
david jencks
--
Sincerely yours and Best Regards,
Xie Xiaodong
for
dispatches. If you can arrange for this with a filter then the rest
of the jsr 196 implementation should not be too hard.
thanks
david jencks
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Rahul Saxena wrote:
If we derive several servlets form s generic servlet
auth thingy. The auth thingy
gets called once per request before the request gets to any filters or
servlets.
thanks
david jencks
--
Rahul Saxena
B.Tech Part III
Computer Science and Engineering
I.T. B.H.U. ,Varanasi
Contact No.-09452196645
umm, concatinate concatenate
david jencks
On Feb 20, 2009, at 10:17 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Feb 20 18:17:29 2009
New Revision: 746321
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=746321view=rev
Log:
Fix spelling
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/web
cf
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec
Is there a new draft of 3.0 or is this for the first public draft?
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 6, 2009, at 7:15 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Jan 6 07:15:32 2009
New Revision: 731967
Since you are putting this in a separate jar, what would you think of
using a package name appropriate for the tomcat project, since these
classes are tomcat/jasper specific and not a product of apache as a
whole?
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 27, 2008, at 2:17 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote
implementation although I
expect it to be a part of javaee 6, and I'm mostly interested in
trying to understand what you are trying to do rather than suggesting
an implementation strategy.
thanks
david jencks
There is a Microsoft “specification” (bug?) by which all LDAP binds
elegant solution IMO.
I'll try to find some time to remind myself of how this works and
comment on it but it may be a while.
thanks
david jencks
I'll try searching the mail archives - the comments in the submits
don't
seem to have more info than the javadocs or
comments... Again, sorry
. There is no standard API to install/uninstall/start/stop
a .war
umm, jsr-88??
david jencks
- but HttpService
is not that either. Runtime config changes ( adding/removing servlets
without web.xml changes
and re-deployment ) is not specified, but it's a whole different
discussion
of this being available is in haskell.
just my highly biased $0.02
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
of this kind of behavior that actually work under load?
thanks
david jencks
Paul
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
Did there is plans, ideas or interest around about OSGI-fing
Tomcat ?
I've put a note about
On Mar 7, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I wondered if there would be consensus that this is a bug
+1
and the proposed fix is appropriate?
+1
Please raise a BZ ticket so this doesn't get lost.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44562
I did
that it fixes the problem. I don't know if there would
be formatting issues applying the patch to tomcat's copy of the spec
classes.
I wondered if there would be consensus that this is a bug and the
proposed fix is appropriate?
thanks
david jencks
is
is to recognize duplicate rules.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 12, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
In that case - that would revert the functionality which caused the
issue to arrive in the first place.
The original bug had a problem because they had the same listener
class declared
jar you happen to pick would be desirable.
thanks
david jencks
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Would this be from trunk or from a previous 6.0.x branch? I seem to
recall some concerns about including the annotation processing
changes that are now in trunk in a 6.0.x release and some thought
that a version number more like 6.1 would be more appropriate.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 4
Sorry, this is my fault. I attached a patch to fix it to http://
issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44261.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 17, 2008, at 5:01 AM, Peter Rossbach wrote:
Why this message was logged?
17.01.2008 13:57:45 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO
I don't think this is relevant to the 6.0.x branch, it depends on the
new DefaultInstanceManager class which AFAIK is only in trunk.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pero
Date: Thu Jan 17 13:47:24 2008
New Revision: 612992
URL: http
injection. What did you have in mind?
thanks
david jencks
2. cluster JMX configurations
+1
3. any NIO improvements that haven't been ported
+1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
email I think you have replaced the
files Remy checked in with geronimo's copies of those files, so if
I'm correct you have not improved the legal situation.
thanks
david jencks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Nov 11, 2007, at 1:24 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 10, 2007, at 2:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Nov 10 14:12:54 2007
New Revision: 593815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593815view=rev
Log:
Add JSP schema fix
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS
not found any authority or reasoning that would let us do
so. I believe the apache policy now allows us to put small numbers
of CDDL schemas in apache svn and ship them but AFAIK we have not yet
done so.
thanks
david jencks
Mark
david jencks
Now we are in a technical debate between comet implementation
between Remy
and Filips designs. This has seemed to migrate into a personal
attack in
a subtle manner.
Such is life when coding. Disagreements occur, feeling are hurt and
email
is the worst method of communicating
version6.0.13-G543818/version
/dependency
/dependencies
/plugin
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 21, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working with mvn and the jetty jspc plugin for pre-compiling jsps
and I've come across
After a lot of discussion with the jetty devs I got them to implement
this, but I've never been able to understand the discussions about
the subject on the tomcat lists so I'm really not sure what the
expected behavior of tomcat is.
thanks
david jencks
Regards,
Joerg
[1] http://marc.info
On May 24, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I tend to agree that a new branch is more appropriate. However,
earlier versions of the patch had a compatibility layer so the old
api could continue to work. I'm happy to add that back in on
request.
I am
On May 17, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
As far as I know I've addressed all the issues that were raised,
but that might have a tenuous relationship to whether I actually
did :-). I'd certainly appreciate review by tomcat committers
before I completely
On May 16, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/
GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the
InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad
On Apr 12, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355273/
GERONIMO-3010-4.patch In addition, this one combines the
InstanceManager interfaces. I think this is a bad idea because it
forces jasper to use an interface
On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
big snip
Right now, it's mostly pita-win (it's a significant
refactoring) :D You should IMO offer some incentive as part of
this to justify the refactoring, such as support for web.xml
annotation overrides in standalone Tomcat (as you can
On Apr 6, 2007, at 2:54 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
i've worked on this some more and come up with a patch that I feel
more or less comfortable showing to tomcat :-) at https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3010 or directly https://
issues.apache.org/jira/secure
On Apr 3, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 4/3/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following Remy's suggestion I implemented web.xml overrides of
annotations but although the result compiles I have no very good way
to determine if it works. I looked around a bit but didn't
the geronimo javaee integration with the javaee
tck, but that doesn't use the code in question. If the standalone
tck is the normal test method, is there some way I could get access
to it?
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 25, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I personally think the AnnotationProcessor is a very questionable
idea and hope no one uses it. However, it is pretty common now.
The point of the adapter is to show that tomcat can still support
people who want
On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
compiled jsps
If you read the spec literally, they can't be annotated, but this
is quite arbitrary IMO (as soon as they're mapped in web.xml, they
can).
Doh! Of course you're right. I just haven't seen a jsp
instances of your choice.
Many thanks,
david jencks
Cheer's
Fabien
On 3/24/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yo,
I've been in touch with the folks at Geronimo.
They use dependency injection, and have a suggestion on how they
would
like the annotation processor to be able
.
There's certainly interest on the geronimo side.
Many thanks
david jencks
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
85 matches
Mail list logo
