I was wondering if someone could fill me in on the correct method/etiquette for creating a patch?I am working with DayTrader and am trying to create a patch for a small change to org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.direct.TradeDirect
.Just for reference, I am working in eclipse using the
... where possible one patch is
preferred if it can be done to solve the problem.--jasonOn Jul 20, 2006, at 7:48 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote: I was wondering if someone could fill me in on the correct method/ etiquette for creating a patch?
I am working with DayTrader and am trying to create
The EJB and Direct modes in Daytrader provide a good measure of how a pure EJB (Session/CMP Entity) application stacks up against a pure JDBC based app. However, one of the things I have felt Trade/Daytrader has always lacked is a middle ground. In my experience, I have neither seen nor heard of
I was just wondering how the logging that is already built into DayTrader can be directed to the geronimo log? I noticed that even when the options are enabled on the DayTrader config page, the log/trace statements are not written.
Does something need to be added to the server-log4j.properties
All,Here's a first pass at a new Web 2.0, AJAX-based, Web
interface for DayTrader! Take a look at and let me know what you think:
http://porky.hogstrom.org:8080/dojo_trader/daytrader.htmlFYI - I highly suggest using Firefox or Mozzilla to view this. Also, thanks to Matt Hogstrom for his
I was wondering if anyone out there has successfully used the wsapp and
streamer application clients that are packaged with Daytrader?
Using the 1.2 branch, I was able to start the wsapp client, but was unable
to perform any web services operations against the server due to the
following
On 12/7/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last time I checked these both worked great with the daytrader-
jpa plan I checked in. I could see everything in streamer and
perform all the operations I could find in wsapp.
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 7, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Christopher
Paul... you'll have to refresh my memory... what context does geronimo
provide the pre-packaged version of dojo at?
On 12/7/06, Paul McMahan (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-17?page=comments#action_12456563]
Paul McMahan commented on
Ran into the following while trying to build from the 1.2 branch today...
I'm a little new to this, so... any thoughts? I checked the target directory
and the XmlUtilTest class appears to be there.
[INFO]
[INFO]
I tried the Sun and IBM 1.5 JDKs? What should I be using?
On 12/8/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What JDK are you using?
On Dec 7, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Ran into the following while trying to build from the 1.2 branch today...
I'm a little new to this, so
Matt...
Everything I've been doing this far has been in the Daytrader 1.2 branch
running against Geronimo 1.1. Still trying to get Geronimo 1.2 built per my
other emails.
I specifically removed those methods in TradeJDBC remote interface so they
would not have to be implemented (in
I have run into some problems trying to run Daytrader 1.2 (branches/1.2) on
Geronimo 1.2 and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions or thoughts?
The application deploys successfully from the console. However, the
following is encountered while starting the application. I have tried to
Ran into the same thing... for both Geronimo 1.2 and 2.0 you need to add the
following to the dependency list in the daytrader deployment plans.
dep:dependency
dep:groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.configs/dep:groupId
dep:artifactIdj2ee-corba-yoko/dep:artifactId
All,
I think there may be some issues with SLSBs in Geronimo 1.2 and was
wondering if anyone had experienced anything similar or if this is already a
known issue.
- Built Geronimo from geronimo/sever/branches/1.2 (01/04/2007)
- Deployed Daytrader (built from geronimo/daytrader/branches/1.2)
-
Happy New Year everyone... is it just me or are there several others out
there having a hard time re-adjusting to a normal work schedule after the
holidays?
Anyway, to get the new year rolling, I was hoping to close out a number open
issues with Daytrader and push out a 1.2 release by January
of the html.
On Jan 5, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Happy New Year everyone... is it just me or are there several others out
there having a hard time re-adjusting to a normal work schedule after the
holidays?
Anyway, to get the new year rolling, I was hoping to close out a number
open
that are not implemented. I
believe you took the other approach in trunk and implemented stubs for
those. Need to get those synced back up.
Thanks...
Chris
On 1/18/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Already done. More of a heads up.
On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Matt...
Want me
Matt... minor typo... the patch is in DT-28...
Thanks...
Chris
On 1/24/07, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt...
Last week you mentioned that after applying the DT-17 and DT-22 patches to
the 1.2 branch, you could not deploy/start the application. I looked
Thanks Matt, et. al. I am really looking forward to this opportunity...
On 1/24/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome aboard Chris!
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
In recognition of Chris' contributions to DayTrader (new UI, new runtime
modes) and his sustained set of patches and nagging
I was double checking the messaging components in Daytrader and noticed that
the topic-based MDBs are not firing. The queue-based MDBs are working
correctly. I am currently running Daytrader 1.2 on Geronimo 1.1.1.
I was wondering if anyone could provide the following...
- tips on tracing MDB
lasantha...
piyush and myself have been trying to push in a lot of improvements lately,
especially regarding the database setup. one of the items we have added is
the ability to create the database tables within the application itself.
take a look at daytrader-14 (
All,
In an effort to close out Daytrader 1.2 (branches/1.2) and and sync up any
unwanted deltas between 1.2 and trunk, I am working my way through the open
JIRAs and applying those with outstanding patches.
Yesterday, I applied updates for the following JIRAs to trunk (since they
had already
Off to Breckenridge for a few days of skiing. I will commit the changes when
I return... or perhaps while I'm there if I have a momentary urge to work
(aka. lapse of judgment)!
On 2/7/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Feb 7, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All
Lasantha...
I just checked out the current revision of Daytrader from trunk and was able
to deploy on both Geronimo 1.2-beta and 2.0-M1. I placed the plan files I
used for each in the following location.
http://people.apache.org/~cjblythe/daytrader_plan_files/
Let me know if you still run into
Dain and David...
Took a swag at deploying Daytrader on Geronimo 2.0-M2... During deployment,
it complained about the openejb-jar.xml file missing from the EJB module. I
added the one you provided earlier in this chain, but for some reason it is
still complaining that the openejb-jar.xml file is
, at 1:59 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Dain and David...
Took a swag at deploying Daytrader on Geronimo 2.0-M2... During
deployment, it complained about the openejb-jar.xml file missing
from the EJB module. I added the one you provided earlier in this
chain, but for some reason it is still
.
As I recall, we have to explicitly grant him access and we often
forget to do this with new committers...
Can someone with necessary karma address?
--kevan
On Feb 7, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All,
In an effort to close out Daytrader 1.2 (branches/1.2
---
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openejb/trunk/openejb3/
container/openejb-core/src/test/resources/convert/oej2/cmp/daytrader/
daytrader-openejb-jar.xml
Thanks...
Chris
On 2/15/07, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David...
Here is the exception I get...
Currently
How old do you consider very old? I got this on the Geronimo 2.0-M2 release
that is out on the Geronimo website dated 1/30/2007.Deployed fine on M1
though...
On 2/16/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
David/Dain...
Did
Matt, et. al.
As part of the DayTrader 1.2/2.0 cleanup, I was looking through the src tree
and was wondering if the following directories need to be deleted, removed,
or revamped.
- images
Looks like this directory contains some Photoshop mock ups of the DayTrader
UI. Do we still need these?
-
a copy of the derby DDL somewhere under
bin.
Any objections?
On 2/21/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:37 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Matt, et. al.
As part of the DayTrader 1.2/2.0 cleanup, I was looking through the
src tree and was wondering
All...
Sorry for the delay in getting to this... Anyway, I put together something
to start with on the wiki (http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/daytrader.html).
I'm not exactly convinced this is the best place for it since we are tying
it to a geronimo version. I guess I'm left wondering what we
I had some additional thoughts as well...
- best practices and/or guidelines for constructing load driver scripts
- steps/guidelines for performing performance measurements
On 2/21/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 21, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All
+1
On 3/1/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 Let's move the authoring over Confluence.
Cheers
Prasad
On 2/28/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
this vote is for moving the authoring of Geronimo's web site over
Confluence. This mean that we will no longer use
Jencks, et. al.
Any idea if this was ever addressed?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3354
Thanks...
Chris
On 8/10/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgot my +1 (perhaps implied)
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have put together the release
All...
I'm working with DayTrader and one of the dev builds of GMO 2.0. I'm trying
to convert the Streamer client over to access an EJB3 based remote session
bean. From the server traces, it looks like the method is being executed
(see below).
19:21:33,125 INFO [OpenEJB] invoking method create
like
the corba specs classes are coming from the jdk rather than yoko/
geronimo.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 21, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All...
I'm working with DayTrader and one of the dev builds of GMO 2.0.
I'm trying to convert the Streamer client over to access
All...
I'm still working with the DayTrader streamer client and have run into
another issue I cannot explain. Both the streamer and ws app client create
Swing-based GUIs. I am in no way a Swing expert; however, all of the docs
that I have read indicate that the GUI thread should remain up and
strong opinions here?
On 8/22/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All...
I'm still working with the DayTrader streamer client and have run
into another issue I cannot explain. Both the streamer and ws app
client create Swing
All,
I finally have all of the EJB 2.1 components pulled from trunk and have
converted DayTrader 2.0 over to be Java EE 5 only. I have functionally
tested as many of the operational modes and primitives that I can think of
and am ready to commit the changes.
Here is a high-level summary of the
All...
Last night/this morning I tried out DayTrader 1.2 on Geronimo 2.0.1 to make
sure everything ran fine. During the effort, I ran into two subtle issues...
Anyway, just wanted to pass them along.
1) Geronimo and/or OpenJPA appears to process sun-ejb-jar.xml files. This is
a file used by Sun
Matt...
Here are a few minor things that come to mind.
- Ensure license files, etc. are up to snuff
- Review readme files to make sure instructions are correct. For the J2EE
client apps, there should be
some mention of setting the endorsed directory
- Make sure config changes are propagated to
Matt,
I was just wondering what processes must be followed for an app server
vendor to release a customized version of DayTrader? We are thinking about
replacing the Trade 6.1 download on the WebSphere site with DayTrader and I
wanted to make sure we cover all our bases from an Apache
send the right message if you ask me.
On 10/2/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Matt...
In summary, I guess I really just wanted to say that I feel the web
services modes in DayTrader should be removed at least until we can
PROTECTED] wrote:
Christopher Blythe wrote:
Actually, I'm suggesting we pull the web services out of DayTrader all
together and write another web services sample app. If DayTrader is
truly meant to be a performance benchmark, why would you leave
something in there that is in clear
:
Christopher Blythe wrote:
Jeff... I agree with you on both counts. Perhaps I should present
this
from another vantage point. If you were an application developer,
would
you use web services in the manner they are currently used in
DayTrader?
Or would you try to adhere to most documented best
the
discussion percolate and put it to a vote.
On Oct 3, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
ah now you're pointing out the distinctions between primitives and a
real application workload. currently, the web services within daytrader
are presented in the context of a workload
matt... just did an initial look. just a few comments for now...
- were there funcational/load issues with the daytrader 1.2 numbers that
were omitted?
- was really surprised by the slow down in the web container primitives
(probably has to do with the spec upgrade) and the jump in direct mode
ah... piyush raises a good point regarding the session 2 direct mode. this
is provided by both daytrader 1.2 and 2.0 and is one of the more common
patterns we see out in the j2ee community.
chris
On 10/23/07, Piyush Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
This is a great report .. thanks
you need a 1.5 JDK to compile the source in trunk because of the annotations
for EE5... if you want to use JDK 1.4.X and J2EE 1.4, i would suggest
looking at the 1.2 branch.
hope this helps...
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 12:57 PM, B.J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I've run into a problem with
saying that the script was
unresponsive, but telling it to continue eventually did display the UI.
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All,
Here's a first pass at a new Web 2.0,
AJAX-based, Web interface for DayTrader
too.
I like what your doing and was wondering when you thought you might have a patch to start layering this into DayTrader? Remember, it doesn't have to be totally complete and there are others in the community that would love to help out.
Cheers.On Oct 12, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Christopher Blythe
works perfectly.The interface is really cool. I'd like to see that patch get in soon, so the Geronimo world can
contribute. Stan. Paul McMahan wrote: On 10/12/06, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul...
Just read through the chain and the idea is sound... I like the idea
All...I'm a little confused about the Daytrader deployment plans riddled throughout the source tree and was wondering if someone could clear up my confusion?Under the tags/1.1.0 and branches/1.1 source trees, the
tomcat-plan.xml and jetty-plan.xml are located and I have been using these on
What is the best method for submitting a patch that contains new files? From what I have read and seen on my own, the cmd line based subversion diff command does not include them in the resulting patch file. Or, am I missing something?
Thanks...Chris-- I say never be complete, I say stop being
patch generated when you type svn diff.Best wishes,PaulOn 10/23/06, Christopher Blythe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the best method for submitting a patch that contains new files? From what I have read and seen on my own, the cmd line based subversion diff command does not include them
to the ASF. this provides a good trail for copyright info as well as visibility for people tracking the project.
On Oct 24, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
I know it has been a while since this thread has been visited; however, I finally got a chance to add a Session Direct mode
-streamThanks again...ChrisOn 10/24/06,
Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the response Paul... that makes sense. Why are the most obvious things the hardest to find? ;-)On 10/23/06,
Paul McMahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Chris,if you check out the src tree using svn then use svn add
David...Read through your notes late last week concerning the JPA mode additions and figured I would add my comments here. We definitely need to add support for JPA and EJB 3.0 into Daytrader; however, we also need to maintain the existing JDBC and EJB
2.1 operating modes in some way shape of
Matt...I've been looking into the de-coupling topic and have some ideas... will post a short explanation later today once I can put a diagram together.ChrisOn 11/13/06,
Matt Hogstrom (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote:
[
Matt, et al.
Thanks for getting this rolling...
I don't really have that much to say about the 1.1.1 release since I have
been putting most of my effort into the new 1.2 branch. However, I do have a
question... I have noticed there is a 1.1 branch and a 1.1.0 tag. Can you
explain the
All...
Thanks to the efforts of David Jencks, Daytrader 2.0 (trunk) already
contains a JPA-based implementation of the Trade services wrapped in an EJB
2.1 stateless session bean. As additional EJB3 and EE5 features are
delivered in Geronimo (and other appservers), Daytrader should follow suit
Frank...
Try using the daytrader-2.0-M2-jpa-plan.xml as the deployment plan. If that
doesn't help, it might be worth trying the SUN JDK.
Chris
On 3/13/07, FranK G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked out the source codes of daytrader from
Matt...
As I mentioned last week, I started working on a full EJB3 mode for
Daytrader 2.0 on Glassfish. I was able to get this up and running under load
late yesterday afternoon. So far, I have not seen any exceptions; however, I
have not had a chance to verify how much data I may be stomping
.
On 3/8/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 8, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All...
Thanks to the efforts of David Jencks, Daytrader 2.0 (trunk)
already contains a JPA-based implementation of the Trade services
wrapped in an EJB 2.1 stateless session bean
Welcome and congrats Jarek!!!
Chris
On 3/20/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Jarek!!!
Joe
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web
After working with Glassfish (Sun Server 9) as part of the DayTrader/EJB3
development effort, it dawned on me that our logging configuration might be
too tightly coupled to Geronimo and may not be that portable to other
application servers. The DayTrader Logger class depends on Apache
be a manual step for now if you really want to use the app
client. Anyway, I guess this approach will have to suffice for non-JCL based
app servers (which could possibly be just Glassfish).
Thanks again...
Chris
On 3/22/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Christopher
Congrats John!!! Best wishes and may the force be with you! ;-)
Chris
On 3/29/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations John!!! I wish you and your family the very best.
Anita
--- John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 27th of March at 11am I became the
of Exceptions thrown by TradeServices interface and impl classes
to adhere to spec
- Addition of SunServer 9 vendor-specific DDs
Chris
On 3/23/07, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I've been working with Glassfish (Sun Server 9) and NetBeans a lot
lately, I wanted to see if I
Dain... congrats!!!
On 4/2/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
congrats!
-sachin
On Mar 30, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Dain Sundstrom
has accepted an invitation to join the PMC.
Nuf 'said.
Welcome :-0
--
I say
Matt...
You mentioned that you deployed DayTrader 1.2... did you happen to run it
under load? JDBC/Direct mode looks good; however, I am still seeing
ConcurrentModificationExceptions while attempting to run more than 1 client
in Session Direct mode
external-rarorg.apache.geronimo.modules
/ge-activemq-rar/1.2/rar/external-rar
On 4/6/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of AMQ is DT using?
--jason
On Apr 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Gave it a shot... no luck. As soon as I started 2 clients, the same
are multithreading stateless session bean instances. I hope this isn't the
cause but IMO we need to find out.
Chris, how do you run the several clients? manually or with a tool?
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Gave it a shot... no luck. As soon as I
or classpath issue?
That could explain the difference in the exception during deployment
(and the problems during deployment could possibly explain the run time
problems).
Jay
Christopher Blythe wrote:
I use a commercial load driving tool... FYI, I'm fairly certain that
G-2.0 has the same issue
Surya... I really like the idea of adding security to DayTrader to assess
the performance impact of J2EE and Java 2 security. What changes would be
necessary to add this in? Would it involve changes to the code in any way,
or would it simply involve changes to properties and/or DD files? Also,
Check out GERONIMO-2708... Basically, anytime you run Session-to-JDBC mode
or Full EJB mode with more than 1 user under load (ie. using an HTTP load
driver), both 1.2-beta and 2.0 builds start throwing those exceptions. Ran
without an issue in 1.1 and 1.1.1 (at least in Session-to-JDBC mode).
Was wondering if there are any samples or tests for Geronimo that use
role-based authentication for EJB methods?
More specifically, I was wondering how to configure the role mappings in the
Geronimo deployment plan. Most of the samples out there revolve around the
war, but I have not found
Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Was wondering if there are any samples or tests for Geronimo that
use role-based authentication for EJB methods?
More specifically, I was wondering how to configure the role
mappings in the Geronimo
hernan...
took a quick look and like what i see... will take a closer look later. one
thing to mention... we added a feature on the config page to create the
database tables and indexes from within the application (should be a link
right above the populate link). might be worth adding that in
and will add it. I thought of covering the
script so the user can actually see how the script works. May help for
setting up on a different a database other than Derby.
Cheers!
Hernan
Christopher Blythe wrote:
hernan...
took a quick look and like what i see... will take a closer look later.
one thing
All...
Just wondering if anyone had any MDB samples working in Geronimo 2.0 (either
EJB 2.1 or 3.0 based). Thanks...
Chris
--
I say never be complete, I say stop being perfect, I say let... lets
evolve, let the chips fall where they may. - Tyler Durden
All,
As it currently stands, DayTrader 2.0 does not provide what I would consider
a viable showcase application for Java EE 5 technology. The JPA mode that
was added uses EJB3/JPA based entities; however, the mode still lacks a few
key elements...
- EJB 3 based stateless session bean providing
All,
Given Geronimo 2.0 and DayTrader 2.0's focus on Java EE 5, I was wondering
if it made sense to remove the old EJB 2.1 code? To be quite honest, I am
torn. One one side, it would be nice to have both the EJB 2.1 and 3.0 impls
at the same time for comparison purposes. However, keeping the old
PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Found another issue with DayTrader in Geronimo 2.0. It looks like
there is some issue with MDBs involved in XA transactions. If I
deploy DayTrader 1.2 or 2.0 and run in Direct mode with Async order
processing enabled (which uses MDBs to handle the complete order
, Christopher Blythe wrote:
David... it does look like the transactions are completing. We just get
this exception written to the console and log during each transaction (which
isn't good for a performance run). Even tough the transaction completed, I
would still imagine that we want the tx info
I was working on DayTrader 2.0 when I found that the resetTrade method for
all of the runtime modes (with the exception of Direct mode) would fail. I
went back and deploy DayTrader 1.2 on GMO 2.0 and noticed the same behavior.
I then went back and deploy DT 1.2 on GMO 1.1.1 and resetTrade worked
)
at
org.apache.openjpa.kernel.AbstractBrokerFactory.syncWithManagedTransaction(
AbstractBrokerFactory.java:684)
... 39 more
On 7/25/07, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt...
The new stateless session bean that I added does exactly what TradeJPA
used to do. It's just been
Found another issue with DayTrader in Geronimo 2.0. It looks like there is
some issue with MDBs involved in XA transactions. If I deploy DayTrader 1.2or
2.0 and run in Direct mode with Async order processing enabled (which uses
MDBs to handle the complete order operations), the following
:
I'd like to see the 2.1 code kept around so we can compare base EJB
performance against other servers. There is going to be legacy
code for a long time and this tool is our only way to see how
legacy code performs on our server.
-dain
On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Christopher Blythe
Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 25, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
I was working on DayTrader 2.0 when I found that the resetTrade
method for all of the runtime modes (with the exception of Direct
mode) would fail. I went back and deploy DayTrader 1.2 on GMO 2.0
Erik...
What version of Geronimo are you trying to install on? The plan files for
DayTrader 1.2 are specific to Geronimo 1.2-beta.
Chris
On 8/1/07, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I am having some issues while attempting to deploy Daytrader, both with
the latest trunk and
PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to get it to run on geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-beta
On 8/1/07, Christopher Blythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik...
What version of Geronimo are you trying to install on? The plan files
for DayTrader 1.2 are specific to Geronimo 1.2-beta.
Chris
On 8/1
tooverridethetransaction
attribute value explicitly or implicitly specified on the bean class.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 1, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
David...
Any idea how this will be handled in EJB 3 beans when the
transaction attributes are defined in the annotations
I'm not aware of anyone that has attempted to port DayTrader over to
Glassfish... chances are there specific items that we'll need to address as
you work your way through the deployment. For instance, in order to get
DayTrader up and running in JBoss, some of the queries had to be modified,
etc.
96 matches
Mail list logo
