Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 12/14/06, Deepak Bhole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why is offline behaviour useful? It is just the way Fedora does things to ensure that everything is traceable. It is to ensure that the entire application is built ground up from sources. All of the System installed jars that I am referring to

Re: The Future of the Release Process.

2006-12-14 Thread Graham Leggett
On Thu, December 14, 2006 1:46 am, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Disclaimer: I am not attempting to set policy, just to get discussion going, document it, and work towards the ideal toolchain that make the future of apache releases smooth, consistent, and resilient

Re: The Future of the Release Process.

2006-12-14 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 12/14/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, December 14, 2006 1:46 am, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: Disclaimer: I am not attempting to set policy, just to get discussion going, document it, and work towards the ideal toolchain that make the future of

Re: XMLBeans Plugin Release

2006-12-14 Thread David Jencks
None of the issues assigned to 2.0.1 are critical for geronimo. for geronimo the most important is http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ MXMLBEANS-19, but that requires xmlbeans to release a correct pom instead of the incorrect one that has no attribution or known origin and that the maven

Re: XMLBeans Plugin Release

2006-12-14 Thread Milos Kleint
from the IDE support perspective,it would be nice to have http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MXMLBEANS-28 fixed. Milos On 12/14/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The Geronimo folks need a release of the XMLBeans plugins, could someone help me look at the issues and see if the issues

Re: svn commit: r487139 - /maven/sandbox/plugins/maven-swizzle-plugin/pom.xml

2006-12-14 Thread John Tolentino
Hi Dennis, Thanks for the edits. Docck checks for the two reporting (javadoc and jxr) plugins though. Should docck exclude the two reporting plugins from the check/list of errors then? Regards, John On 12/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: dennisl Date: Thu Dec 14

Re: svn commit: r487139 - /maven/sandbox/plugins/maven-swizzle-plugin/pom.xml

2006-12-14 Thread Dennis Lundberg
John Tolentino wrote: Hi Dennis, Thanks for the edits. Docck checks for the two reporting (javadoc and jxr) plugins though. Should docck exclude the two reporting plugins from the check/list of errors then? No I don't think so. These two plugins had to be moved to a profile because of the

Re: Who should use SNAPSHOT when? RE: The Future of the Release Process.

2006-12-14 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, If I understand correctly, the problem is that a 'staged' release still contains a SNAPSHOT keyword in the metadata/filename? Also, how would you see snapshot 'releases' without a snapshot keyword? If there's no indicator (timestamp?) in the filename, you'll overwrite the previous deployed

Being able to modify HTTP headers for a request

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
Joakime, Do you think you could add something that would allow us to add to set of headers that are sent to a client, and set the client string? In Maven I would like to accurately keep track of what versions of Maven are actively in use and I think being able to send version information

maven-ear-plugin and dependencies

2006-12-14 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, Using the v2.3-SNAPSHOT version of the ear plugin, I am struggling to get the application.xml file built correctly. Between maven1 and maven2, the ejb plugin lost it's ability to bundle dependencies inside the ejb. This means (as I understand it) that it's now up to the ear plugin to

Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Carl Trieloff
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 13 Dec 06, at 10:26 AM 13 Dec 06, Carl Trieloff wrote: I don't see that there is a consistent view yet on this. It would be nice to get to a conclusion on whether the Maven community would like to work with the downstream distros teams so that we can provide a

Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14 Dec 06, at 9:46 AM 14 Dec 06, Carl Trieloff wrote: Suggestion: Would a good starting point be to maybe be to create a branch where some guys can work, and then we work item by item with the maven community. once we get an issue out the way, and agreed by maven team we merge the

Re: Tomcat failure

2006-12-14 Thread Stephen Pietrowicz
Has anyone had a chance to look at this, to see if there's something obviously wrong? If it looks ok, I'll start looking anywhere else you might suggest. I'm really at a loss at this point. On Dec 12, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Stephen Pietrowicz wrote: That didn't work. Here is my addition

Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Rafael Schloming
Just to clarify the building from source situation, the real requirement is that if we were in a concrete bunker somewhere with no connection to the outside world, and all we had was an installed fedora box + all the source rpms for fedora, we should be able to rebuild the entire OS. Note

Re: Tomcat failure

2006-12-14 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Look at this file : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-webapp-test/src/test/tomcat5x/conf/Catalina/localhost/continuum.xml We use it for our web-ui test and it works fine. Emmanuel Stephen Pietrowicz a écrit : Has anyone had a chance to look at this, to see if

Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14 Dec 06, at 10:30 AM 14 Dec 06, Rafael Schloming wrote: Just to clarify the building from source situation, the real requirement is that if we were in a concrete bunker somewhere with no connection to the outside world, and all we had was an installed fedora box + all the source rpms

Re: The Future of the Release Process.

2006-12-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 18:54, Tom Huybrechts wrote: 6) All source files in the sources.jar files will contain the following header. ---(snip)--- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE

Re: Being able to modify HTTP headers for a request

2006-12-14 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
I would like to have this optionally work across all current (and future) wagon wheels (providers). How about the following methods? for reference - http://maven.apache.org/wagon/wagon-provider-api/apidocs/org/apache/maven/wagon/Wagon.html Wagon.setClientProperties( Properties );

Re: Being able to modify HTTP headers for a request

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14 Dec 06, at 12:24 PM 14 Dec 06, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: I would like to have this optionally work across all current (and future) wagon wheels (providers). How about the following methods? for reference - http://maven.apache.org/wagon/wagon-provider-api/apidocs/org/apache/

Re: maven-ear-plugin and dependencies

2006-12-14 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Hi, This has been tackled a dozen of times and I am not sure it has anything to do with the EAR plugin, at least if we follow the spec. If I am wrong, please let me know. The valid way to bundle shared components/libs in a EAR is to define the Class-Path entry of the manifest in EJB module(s)

Re: maven-ear-plugin and dependencies

2006-12-14 Thread David Jencks
On Dec 14, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Stephane Nicoll wrote: Hi, This has been tackled a dozen of times and I am not sure it has anything to do with the EAR plugin, at least if we follow the spec. If I am wrong, please let me know. The valid way to bundle shared components/libs in a EAR is to define

Re: maven-ear-plugin and dependencies

2006-12-14 Thread Stephane Nicoll
On 12/14/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree that spec support is the way to go. the jee5 ear lets you specify a lib directory (default is lib) where all the jars inside get added to the classpath. We could work on jee5 support, that ought to keep everyone happy. Does the

Maven-timestamp-plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
In a #maven discussion, it was uncovered that a timestamp plugin was written for the geronimo project. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1659 Is there any interest in bringing this into maven-plugins for others to use? +1

Re: Maven-timestamp-plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14 Dec 06, at 3:22 PM 14 Dec 06, Brian E. Fox wrote: In a #maven discussion, it was uncovered that a timestamp plugin was written for the geronimo project. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1659 Is there any interest in bringing this into maven-plugins for others to use?

RE: Maven-timestamp-plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
I think the specific use case is to make it get into filtered resources. It would be better if it was just available without a plugin but in 2.0.x there isn't any other way apparently. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006

Re: Maven-timestamp-plugin

2006-12-14 Thread jason . dillon
I'm not sure this does anything useful. I recommend using antrun if you need timestamping. --jason -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:22:08 To:Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Maven-timestamp-plugin In a #maven

Re: Maven-timestamp-plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14 Dec 06, at 3:51 PM 14 Dec 06, Brian E. Fox wrote: I think the specific use case is to make it get into filtered resources. It would be better if it was just available without a plugin but in 2.0.x there isn't any other way apparently. It would be easy enough to put that in the

Re: Maven-timestamp-plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
FYI here you can find a similar plugin which can be used to set various properties for resource filtering (timestamp/date, a decorated version number...). This is actually only used for Magnolia builds but maybe it could be useful to someone else: http://svn.magnolia.info/svn/maven-plugins/

Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Rafael Schloming
Jason van Zyl wrote: On 14 Dec 06, at 10:30 AM 14 Dec 06, Rafael Schloming wrote: Just to clarify the building from source situation, the real requirement is that if we were in a concrete bunker somewhere with no connection to the outside world, and all we had was an installed fedora box +

Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14 Dec 06, at 4:07 PM 14 Dec 06, Rafael Schloming wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On 14 Dec 06, at 10:30 AM 14 Dec 06, Rafael Schloming wrote: Just to clarify the building from source situation, the real requirement is that if we were in a concrete bunker somewhere with no connection to

Maven Site Plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I have managed to get the site plugin working with 2.0.4 and it really wasn't a simple matter of rolling back some stuff. In order for the site plugin to work with 2.0.4 the version of doxia that is in MAVEN_HOME/lib must be used which is doxia-1.0-alpha-7. The version of doxia in

Re: Update: Re: [vote] maven release process ( gpg / javadoc / site / source / remote-resources ) plugins.

2006-12-14 Thread Brett Porter
We could add this to release plugin configuration in the parent POM. On 14/12/2006, at 2:08 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: It looks like the -Preporting flag wasn't used when deploying the sites. Some of the reports might not be missed, but apparently this also precludes the goal pages (ex:

RE: Update: Re: [vote] maven release process ( gpg / javadoc / site / source / remote-resources ) plugins.

2006-12-14 Thread Brian E. Fox
Does the release plugin deploy the site now? -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:58 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Update: Re: [vote] maven release process ( gpg / javadoc / site / source / remote-resources )

[m2] Dev help needed: Should multiple repositories be able to host an artifact, potentially with different versions

2006-12-14 Thread Barrie Treloar
See http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=7884079framed=yskin=177 for full discussion. The problem is that a plugin contains defects that have not yet been resolved in a release. The defect may be fixed in a snapshot version or there may be an unapplied patch available. The releases of

[jira] Subscription: Design Best Practices

2006-12-14 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design Best Practices (37 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques

Re: Update: Re: [vote] maven release process ( gpg / javadoc / site / source / remote-resources ) plugins.

2006-12-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 14 Dec 06, at 7:00 PM 14 Dec 06, Brian E. Fox wrote: Does the release plugin deploy the site now? By default it has for a while. There are default goals (deploy, site- deploy) if you don't specify any. Jason. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven Site Plugin

2006-12-14 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 12/14/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have managed to get the site plugin working with 2.0.4 and it really wasn't a simple matter of rolling back some stuff. ... Thanks for doing this. But... (you knew it was coming) I'm having trouble with it when site.xml contains

Re: Maven and Fedora

2006-12-14 Thread Ralph Goers
Jason van Zyl wrote: Yah, I don't buy it. I don't know anyone who uses RPMs to do anything with Java. Actually, if you'll recall our conversations at ApacheCon I mentioned something like that. RPMs make no sense because the ClassLoader can't use them. They also make no sense because the