Maybe ask LinkedIn, Zappos, Evernote, Living Social or Adobe if it's
prudent to assume that no one will ever get hold of your password hashes.
One researcher was able to recover 80% (~140 million) of passwords from the
LinkedIn breach in a single day, they were using unsalted SHA1.
Regards
Scott
+1 on binding status to InventoryItemDetail.
Regards
Scott
On 22 December 2016 at 21:50, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> Very interesting thread, thanks to you all for the valuable exchange of
> information.
>
> My two cents:
> * it would be great to refactor Se
I guess it depends on how this will be used but I think there is a big
difference between " // do not validate results with errors" and returning
false from an isValid method. IMO an error output response is perfectly
valid.
Regards
Scott
On 28 December 2016 at 21:47, wrote:
> Author: jleroux
cause it's used
>>>> before running the service.
>>>> I guess it's how it should be used (why running isValid() before
>>>> running?). So I guess we can simply use that
>>>>
>>>> public boolean isValid(Map context, String mode,
>>>> L
What's the plan for the hot-deploy folder? Remove it?
Regards
Scott
On 3 January 2017 at 08:26, gil portenseigne
wrote:
> +1
>
> Gil
>
>
>
> On 02/01/2017 17:45, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> In reference to earlier discussions and threads on the above subject, I am
>> here
nd prepare
> a mechanism for handling plugins. Perhaps we can start aanother thread to
> discuss the next steps moving forward.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Taher Alkhateeb
>
> On Jan 2, 2017 11:02 PM, "Scott Gray"
> wrote:
>
> > What's the plan for the hot-
e a massive amount of lib dependencies and some entanglements with
> core.
>
> On Jan 2, 2017 11:42 PM, "Scott Gray"
> wrote:
>
> > Ok thanks, it just wasn't clear to me.
> >
> > My only concern with renaming it just for the sake of renaming it is t
I prefer "Business" to "ERP" or "Enterprise" but I'm not sure about the
repeating syllables involved in saying "Apache OFBiz Business {thing}".
The biz biz doesn't flow well so I'm inclined to fall back to "Enterprise".
Another adjective to consider over "framework" might be "platform".
The frame
Did you check if the email in the body was subscribed? ad...@officefans.net
Regards
Scott
On 16 January 2017 at 20:52, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We receive a lot of the forwarded email (attachment) in the OFBiz dev ML.
> Since ad...@fcc-foshan.com is not registered they are moderated and
gt;>
>> Le 22/09/2016 à 14:07, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>
>>> Le 22/09/2016 à 13:22, Scott Gray a écrit :
>>>
>>>> This mostly to somehow battle test it, even if I know it works well
>>>>>
>>>> So does it need battle testing
wrote:
> OK, I'll answer your questions step by step. I just need time...
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 22/01/2017 à 22:01, Scott Gray a écrit :
>
>> 1. Ask for input
>> 2. Get no responses except a -1
>> 3. Wait for a few months
>> 4. Proceed anyway without fu
What comments are you looking for? It either works or it doesn't.
A couple of things to consider:
- Is there really a good reason to delete a WorkEffort record when changing
its status should be sufficient?
- Maybe it doesn't work now because the data model has changed since it was
introduced?
-
Hi Pierre,
It was disabled and it is still disabled, the only change relevant to
ebaystore is the means of disablement. I'm not sure what needs to be
re-thought? Eventually someone will decide that addressing the 3rd party
library issues in ebaystore is an itch they want to scratch, but until th
Scott
On 30 January 2017 at 09:54, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Maybe removing code that doesn't work from the code base?
>
> Best regard,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
Try and be patient Jacques, I'm also having trouble understanding what you
are saying.
Here's what I've been able to understand so far:
- Pre-gradle OFBiz tests run fine on buildbot
- Gradle OFBiz fails on buildbot with a complaint that the default ports
are in use
- The test framework in OFBiz ha
I've been using git-svn for years, I don't think my setup involved as many
steps as that document shows though. I think I just started from git svn
init.
The main advantages for me was to be able to stash works in progress and to
make multiple local commits before pushing to svn.
Regards
Scott
Well it's been a while since I worked on the trunk but yes, I would still
use git svn for the work.
Regards
Scott
On 19/02/2017 21:18, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote:
Thanks Scott,
Do you mean you are still using it, or?
Jacques
Le 18/02/2017 à 23:03, Scott Gray a écrit :
> I
setup who put it in place
more recently?
Regards
Scott
On 19 February 2017 at 22:22, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> OK thanks, so would you say that the steps in the document are too much
> and you could change them or it's OK and up to date as is?
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 1
I imagine it would be fairly simple to add another top level folder with
the same functionality as plugins if desired. Easy enough that we don't
have to include it out of the box.
On 5/03/2017 03:42, "Wai" wrote:
> Either way is fine for me. I'll name my components directories in 'plugins'
> wit
We seemingly couldn't agree on the best logo either, yet we have only one.
I think an instant run-off vote (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting) would probably be the
most appropriate way to come to a conclusion, given the large number of
themes and relatively small number of votes
I'm not familiar with the work Adrian did any subsequent work but I do
believe the basis of the idea has merit. While there are some similarities
between a form and a table, I think there are enough differences that it
would be easier to move forward with new features specific to one or the
other
I'm curious as to how it was ever added, when the birt component was first
introduced I'm pretty sure we agreed to not include this part of it because
of licensing concerns.
On 25 March 2017 at 02:34, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:01
I agree with Jacopo, these are very functional changes that shouldn't be
made without understanding the workflow. It's good to clean up the code
but it shouldn't be done blindly.
On 25 March 2017 at 02:13, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at
I agree with Jacques and Deepak. The code is an improvement on what was
there, end of story. A contributor is a volunteer who is free to do as much
or as little as they please so long as each contribution is a full step
forward.
Regards
Scott
On 3/04/2017 17:13, "Deepak Dixit" wrote:
> I agree
In the current project I'm working on I see a lot of developers making the
mistake of caching date filtered queries.
Why shouldn't you cache date filtered queries?
1. If you're filtering by the current moment in time then the results are
irrelevant within a few moments of them being retrieved. So
> it seems to be quite a specific workaround as opposed to a generic
> solution. Shouldn't we instead have something that works for all dates
> instead of just specific dates with the name "fromDate" when compared with
> current date / time?
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017
I think Google has a phone number library that could be put to use to take
the heavy lifting off our shoulders.
Regards
Scott
On 15/04/2017 00:53, "Pierre Smits" wrote:
> For (to be) OFBiz definitions, I suggest to review ITU and country policies
> regarding the various kinds of telephone defin
Having tests setup and teardown the data they need would possibly allow us
to run test suites in parallel which would dramatically decrease the
processing time.
I like having the tests depend on the database though, in the past it's
been helpful for spotting deadlocks.
Regards
Scott
On 24 April
Could you expand on that please Taher? The tests are run once all demo data
is loaded are they not?
Regardless, I appreciate this effort as it's long overdue.
Regards
Scott
On 28/04/2017 00:13, "Taher Alkhateeb" wrote:
> Does not work, it will fail tests if you put them in that order. Feel fre
I would prefer they were left assigned to the committer since the onus
tends to fall on them if there are any post closure issues.
My guess if that Pierre wants to track what tickets he contributed to
beyond being the reporter. Could you confirm Pierre?
Beyond what I've mentioned is there any ot
based solutions & services
>>
>> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
>> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Michael Brohl > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> thanks for trying to clarify and gi
).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Scott Gray
> wrote:
>
> &
ut if you feel that strong about it, I suggest you
> find out.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Wed, Ma
I've seen that error before when one of two things happened:
1. Apache timed out waiting for a response from OFBiz
2. The client (browser) cancelled the request before OFBiz was able to
respond. e.g. the user closed the browser or refreshed or navigated away.
So it isn't a bug as such, it's more a
+1
Regards
Scott
On 16 May 2017 at 20:11, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
> This is the vote thread to release a new bug fix release for the
> release16.11 branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 16.11.02" will
> supersede the 16.11.01 release.
>
> The release fi
Isn't a stacktrace pointless given that this would happen during finalize?
It wouldn't say anything about where the problem is.
Regards
Scott
On 10/06/2017 07:21, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote:
> Actually I just added "\n Please report by creating an OFBIZ-9297 subtask
> with the stack trace, thanks"
The project I'm currently on is actively using clustering (session
replication) and I know for certain this isn't the only project nor are we
the only vendor to use it. I'm using an older version of OFBiz though so I
can't confirm if the latest codebase has it working. It can be tricky to
set up
;>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Taher Alkhateeb <
> >>> slidingfilame...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> So the good thing is that the refactoring exercise surfaced this
> issue.
> >>>> Based on feedback from Sc
Hi Taher,
I can understand your frustration, but this:
> This commit is wrong and bad on multiple levels. Please revert
is an unproductive and unreasonable request. Whether you want to or not,
you have to justify the request. Obviously the developer doesn't know what
is wrong or they wouldn't
Hi Nicolas,
My first code review in a while so I apologize if I'm wrong on any points,
or if they've been discussed already.
1. It would be good if the services were converted one per commit, with the
empty minilang file removed at the end with a separate commit. That would
allow reviewers to co
I don't mind if the behavior changes, but it's never bothered me since the
information is only a few lines above the build's success/fail message. Or
at least, it was with the ant build system, I haven't tried with gradle
recently enough to recall.
Regards
Scott
On 10 July 2017 at 07:18, Taher A
+1 for logging a warning instead of an error
+1 for using an element to deprecate. Although I'd prefer "deprecated" for
the element name and I'd prefer "use-instead" for the attribute name.
Would keep us consistent with java conventions, @deprecated and the text is
often "use X instead". I think
Hi Vaibhav,
It's a good question and mailing list archives (that are available) don't
really answer the question clearly. At the moment as far as I can tell,
the quantityUomId and unitsIncluded field do nothing, they're display only.
I think SupplierProduct.unitsIncluded is the same as
Product.q
; the first release of the last freezed branch
>
> Opinions?
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 07/08/2017 à 00:02, Scott Gray a écrit :
>
>> Some additional nice to haves:
>> - Add a "since" attribute to the "deprecated" element that would contain
>> ei
Hi Vaibhav,
Comments inline.
Regards
Scott
On 11 August 2017 at 02:55, Vaibhav Jain
wrote:
> Thank you so much Scott for sharing these details, indeed they are really
> helpful.
> Kindly see my comments inline.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Scott Gray
> wr
It's also used for pricing rule and promotion capabilities.
Laybys/layaways, rainchecks and purchases on account also would benefit
from the order model.
If POS were extended to hospitality that would also rely on an order model.
Regards
Scott
On 29/08/2017 23:29, "Arun Patidar" wrote:
> Hello
Definitely changes the behavior, but the behavior wasn't good before (and
still isn't good now). If we can't return an accurate order item sub-total
then we should be throwing an exception IMO.
This is often why we can't just bulk fix the issues reported by static
analysis tools, because the fix
Since this is such a complex problem perhaps we better come up with a best
practice since we have so many Helper/Worker/Reader classes in OFBiz and a
bit of API consistency goes a long way.
If a GenericEntityException is thrown within a Helper/Worker/Reader class
method, how should we handle it?
I'm in favor of keeping them and adding the service definitions. As Taher
mentions, these are CRUD services and IMO if we have the table, we should
have the set of services allowing management of the data.
These implementations are quite synonymous with the FacilityContactMech
services, they're o
Hi Suraj,
I still haven't seen an example of a useful use case for adding
from/thruDate fields to the PartyRole table. Did you have anything in mind
that it might help with?
I'd honestly prefer to remove it rather than expand it.
Regards
Scott
On 29 September 2017 at 20:41, Suraj Khurana <
sur
Honestly I think the topic is generic enough that OFBiz doesn't need to
provide any information at all. Thread pool sizing is not exclusive to
OFBiz and it would be strange for anyone to modify the numbers without
first researching sources that provide far more detail than a few sentences
in our c
I think it's better to have for-update available for use for the majority
of use-cases than it is to exclude it altogether. I'd rather lose the
databases that don't support it than constrain the ones that do and are
used most by pretty much everyone. It would be nice to hear from anyone
using a d
Yeah I learned this one the hard way after boarding a 12 hour flight.
Fortunately I had a few old copies of OFBiz lying around from back in the
good old days.
Regards
Scott
On 15 November 2017 at 05:15, Michael Brohl
wrote:
> Reminder to self: update the (great) README.md for this switch :-)
>
I'm in favor of removing, it's been there since at least 2003 and is most
likely from a legacy search screen that has since been superseded.
Regards
Scott
On 15 November 2017 at 21:14, Suraj Khurana wrote:
> Thanks, Jacques and Michael for your inputs,
>
> I agree with both the points, either s
I agree with Paul that FinAccountTrans shouldn't reference orderId or
returnId. I have nothing to add, his reasoning is spot on.
Regards
Scott
On 21 November 2017 at 16:56, Paul Foxworthy wrote:
> Hi Vaibhav,
>
> I'm really uncomfortable about this.
>
> As Pierre said, FinAccountTrans is for a
auth="false" and a permission service are completely incompatible
scenarios. In what situation could you possibly have no userLogin and
successfully run a permission service?
What would you expect to happen instead of the current behavior?
Regards
Scott
On 3 November 2017 at 17:35, Suraj Khuran
You can treat each instance as a separate pool in serviceengine.xml, so
that instance A sends jobs and runs jobs from poolA and instance B uses
poolB.
Regards
Scott
On 3/01/2018 03:04, "Nicolas Malin" wrote:
When a job is created by an instance, there are no information on who will
be run it
I'm not familiar with commonext or exampleext, but the purpose of the
entity-ext component was to allow the entity engine to exist without the
service engine. That's why all the entity-related logic that relies on the
service engine is implemented there (EECAs, EntitySync, DCC). The
alternative w
I'm in favor of the status quo. It's useful to have them available out of
the box to be able to pick the one you need and proceed without having to
look elsewhere. The same goes for the fieldtype definitions.
Regards
Scott
On 8/01/2018 6:26 AM, "Pierre Smits" wrote:
We could consider having ex
The argument was that the configs weren't being used by default, so the
same would, in theory, apply to those files.
Regards
Scott
On 9/01/2018 5:14 AM, "Jacques Le Roux"
wrote:
Le 08/01/2018 à 01:36, Scott Gray a écrit :
> The same goes for the fieldtype definitions.
>
ity-core-impl.jar: entity engine available to
> > legacy applications (built from scratch)
> > 2) service-core-api.jar + service-core-impl.jar: service engine available
> > to legacy applications (built from scratch)
> > 3) entity-core-api.jar + entity-core-custom impl.jar: cus
t; >> If an service implements and do checks for the permissions then it must
> >>> have the auth set as true. If any occurrences found then it should be
> by
> >>> mistake and service definition should be fix to match.
> >>>
> >>> So I th
A little bit off topic but I recently wrote an EntityCondition converter
for use with the rsql-parser[1] library. Using it on an html client to
write free-form queries would need some javascript wizardry but it's worth
looking at if we ever wanted to implement something like Jira's JQL
capability.
Every code change is at a minimum an improvement. Our other tags are just
more specific improvements e.g. a fix is an improvement to something that
was previously broken.
Regards
Scott
On 9/02/2018 06:19, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote:
> I use completed for these cases because it's not really an impr
Jacques, as a first step, please consider not using "no functional change"
any longer. It used to be that it was simply used for basic formatting
fixes, but now that I look closer, I notice you've had a trend going for a
while now that you're using it for anything you consider to be minor.
Example
Hi Taher,
I'm not sure I understand or if something has changed in the last few years
but seed-initial should always expect to be loaded after seed data so it
shouldn't be a problem for seed-initial to depend on seed data. You would
never just load seed-initial into an empty database.
Regards
Sc
order of
> writing the readers in the command line. There are still some issues
> in other areas of loading, so I need to study it a bit further.
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:46 AM, Scott Gray
> wrote:
> > Hi Taher,
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand or if someth
It's easy to just search the log output for "JUNIT (failure)", which
reports this test failed:
2018-03-13 13:18:52,725 |main |TestRunContainer
|W| [JUNIT (failure)] -
auto-accounting-transaction-tests-purchase.testAcctgTransOnPaymentSentToSupplier
: Assertion failed: [acctgTr
Hi Rajesh,
It looks like the XmlRpcEventHandler class doesn't support this but it
could easily be modified to do so. I'd suggest filing a ticket, and
perhaps even providing a patch :-)
The tenantId just needs to be derived from the url and then passed into the
userLogin service in the OfbizRpcAu
request.getAttribute("delegator");
> if (report != null) {
> BufferedReader reader = null;
> StringBuilder buf = new StringBuilder();
> try {
> // read the inputstream buffer
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar
I guess what Michael is getting at, is that the demo server is for demos,
it's not intended for use as a development sandbox.
As far as I can tell you don't *need* to be using the demo servers for
this, it's just convenient for you. But the problem is, if you're
modifying the code on the demos an
mporary poor man solution. I have no other domain
> available.
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 16/03/2018 à 03:08, Scott Gray a écrit :
>
>> I guess what Michael is getting at, is that the demo server is for demos,
>> it's not intended for use as a development sandbox.
&
Something else must be wrong Jacques, I can't understand what you're saying
in the ticket description or in your reply above but I do know the
following:
OFBiz is perfectly capable of knowing that
org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade
implements the javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest and i
Scott
On 23 March 2018 at 07:36, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Did you try what I said?
>
> You can easily check by svn updating to r1819133 and removing the wrapper
> in ContextFilter.java.
>
> Maybe we need to revert Tomcat SSO then?
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
>
expensive.
I'm also not even sure if our custom ObjectType methods for checking this
type of thing are necessary any more with so many new java versions since
it was decided these were needed for performance reasons.
Regards
Scott
On 24 March 2018 at 10:59, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Le
side there.
e.g.
UtilValidate.isHttpServletRequest(Object request) {
// do the new test here
}
In the service definition:
That would solve the problem for now until the service engine is improved
and tested or the tomcat SSO login design is improved.
Regards
Scott
On 24 March 2018 at 17
s are discussed in the dev mailing list. It's also absolutely
critical that issues raised in review are discussed rather than ignored,
nothing should ever be committed when the only reviews are doubtful ones.
Regards
Scott
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Scott Gray (JIRA)
Date:
Yeah, I said exactly that elsewhere in the same email.
Regards
Scott
On 26 March 2018 at 21:17, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Le 24/03/2018 à 18:49, Scott Gray a écrit :
>
>> I'm also not even sure if our custom ObjectType methods for checking this
>> type of thing are nec
It would be good to leave it on somewhere in the system like the example
entities maybe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 22:13 Jacques Le Roux,
wrote:
> Le 04/04/2018 à 12:07, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
> > I'm not sure about the field in the entity component though! it
> > might be needed in some unit tests?
If there's an ongoing discussion on the dev list then I don't think it's a
good idea to try to move it to jira until there's some consensus on the
path forward.
Regards
Scott
On 4 April 2018 at 10:14, Taher Alkhateeb
wrote:
> I am a little lost in this JIRA and cannot follow the discussion. Can
then renaming
> the
> > SystemProperty entity to BusinessProperty is necessary. Having a specific
> > UI for DB access for these properties is also necessary. I foresee the
> > webtools as the best place for this UI. It should be accessible by
> tenants.
> >
> >
Hi Suraj,
I haven't reviewed the code in question so I don't have any comment at this
stage. But one thing I want to point out is that OFBiz has many years of
history available in commit logs, jira and mailing lists. It's often quite
a simple task to look back over that history and determine why a
Just to throw in my 2 cents, I don't think the naming is so confusing that
it warrants changing. The number of replies in this thread highlights that
it isn't a straightforward thing to change, and personally I don't think
the names are so bad that it's worth any of the pain that might come from
c
Hi Gil,
Maybe I'm missing something but crashed jobs are reset at the same time
that they're marked as crashed (during startup). I don't have the latest
code in front of me but it used to be in JobManager.reloadCrashedJobs().
Basically when an instance restarts, any jobs marked as running are move
issing to offer a way to reset it, i guess
> it was
> > no harm to commit it into trunk...
> >
> > I will look for an explanation of our issue soon, to check if there is
> > something to fix.
> >
> > Now that I understand better the crashed job mechanism, i&#
Another additional option we could consider at some point is to extract the
GL out to it's own component. It would simplify evaluation for people who
do want to use it, and removal for that don't or replacement for anyone who
wants to use something else.
Regards
Scott
On Thu, 3 May 2018, 18:12 Am
I think no matter what we use someone will always want something different.
I'm beginning to lose count of the number of custom APIs I've written over
the years to support custom UIs.
I think the bigger win would be to start providing APIs and rewriting our
existing screens to use them. From there
On Mon, 14 May 2018, 20:38 Taher Alkhateeb,
wrote:
> Hello Scott, thank you for your thoughts, inline ...
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Scott Gray
> wrote:
> > I think no matter what we use someone will always want something
> different.
> > I'm beginnin
would appreciate a bit more elaboration to get a better understanding of
> your point of view since this seems to be a critical architectural
> decision.
>
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018, 9:39 PM Scott Gray
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 14 May 2018, 20:38 Taher Alkhateeb,
> > w
Hi All,
I just noticed that the iText maven bundle is a bit tricksy and includes
iText 5.6.6 as a dependency, with the latter being GPL licensed. You can
see it by running "./gradlew -q dependencies":
+--- com.lowagie:itext:4.2.0
|\--- com.itextpdf:itextpdf:5.5.6
I haven't checked to see if
under the Affero General
> Public License
> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License> version
> 3.>>
> >>
> >> MPL being OK as binary
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >> Le 08/06/2018 à 03:57
; exclude 'com.itextpdf:itextpdf:5.5.6'
> }
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018, 11:40 AM Scott Gray
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Jacques,
> >
> > Maybe I wasn't clear, OFBiz is downloading 5.5.6 as a dependency of
> 4.2.0,
> > does it make sense?
> >
>
My first inclination is that taking legal advice from a company that is
trying to sell you a license, probably isn't a good idea. They have a
vested interest in trying to convince you not to use the MIT version.
Regardless, I think Taher's solution works in the short term and the other
alternativ
Are there any genuine doubts about 2.1.7? Or just a warning from the
company trying to sell the AGL licensed versions?
If we revert back to 2.1.7 then I don't think we need to ask legal anything.
Regards
Scott
On 14 June 2018 at 18:56, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Le 14/06/2018 à 07:2
I think it relates to the "context" variable that is frequently used in
groovy data prep scripts for the script output.
I'm not in front of a computer, but looking at it in that light may help.
Regards
Scott
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, 09:24 Taher Alkhateeb,
wrote:
> I didn't get into it before, but
FYI, I think this commit accidentally introduced a weird import into
GenericPK:
import org.apache.sis.internal.jdk7.Objects
probably intended to be java.util.Objects
Regards
Scott
On 28 October 2017 at 15:19, wrote:
> Author: mbrohl
> Date: Sat Oct 28 15:19:56 2017
> New Revision: 1813640
>
>
2018 at 17:12, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Hello Scott,
>
> Scott Gray writes:
>
> > I think it relates to the "context" variable that is frequently used in
> > groovy data prep scripts for the script output.
> >
> > I'm not in front of a comp
Thanks Michael!
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, 08:48 Michael Brohl, wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> thanks for spotting this, I will fix it!
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
> Am 26.07.18 um 23:40 schrieb Scott Gray:
> > FYI, I think this commit accidentally introduced a weird i
Hi Jacques,
Assuming I was looking at the correct patch, it looks like I could use this
feature to login as anyone. All I need to do is send any userLoginId to
getJwtToken and then I can login as that user with the token that comes
back. Am I missing something?
Regards
Scott
On 15 August 2018
See the note under the compression config here:
https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/http.html#Standard_Implementation
Regards
Scott
On 20 August 2018 at 07:38, girish.vasmat...@hotwaxsystems.com <
girish.vasmat...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/08/20 07:20:38, Michael Brohl
1 - 100 of 2973 matches
Mail list logo
